Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Swingers Chat |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was only delayed by a twat of an MP who blocked it at the last reading - will still come into effect when it's next heard though. If there's consent it's hugely different from the disgusting practice of doing so without - personally if pics are being taken with consent there are a lot more eye catching pics I'd rather see "Yes, there is still no specific offence for the reason you've mentioned but the government are quite rightly going to get this as an offence asap. In the meantime there is still sect. 5 of the public order act and I'm amazed that police haven't used this on occasions.
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was only delayed by a twat of an MP who blocked it at the last reading - will still come into effect when it's next heard though. If there's consent it's hugely different from the disgusting practice of doing so without - personally if pics are being taken with consent there are a lot more eye catching pics I'd rather see " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve taken some of myself using a selfie stick. Hehe "Hilarious  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Such an oddly specific law, the publishing is already an offence. I wonder what would happen to the owners of all the security cameras covering town on a weekend night capturing this and more on a regular basis. Is this for intended for paparazzi or is this actually a 'thing'?" It's the intent that matters. Unintentional recording falls outwith the scope of the legislation. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Taking any pics without permission is a violation, if it does become illegal then the punishment will still be pathetic " Two years in prison is the term being put forward - not that pathetic really even if it is the max that can be given | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Such an oddly specific law, the publishing is already an offence. I wonder what would happen to the owners of all the security cameras covering town on a weekend night capturing this and more on a regular basis. Is this for intended for paparazzi or is this actually a 'thing'? It's the intent that matters. Unintentional recording falls outwith the scope of the legislation." I haven't read the bill but would imagine that would be quite a pointless law with that get out clause. Just strikes me that with all the violence around there are more important things to spend parliaments time on right now. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was only delayed by a twat of an MP who blocked it at the last reading - will still come into effect when it's next heard though. If there's consent it's hugely different from the disgusting practice of doing so without - personally if pics are being taken with consent there are a lot more eye catching pics I'd rather see Yes, there is still no specific offence for the reason you've mentioned but the government are quite rightly going to get this as an offence asap. In the meantime there is still sect. 5 of the public order act and I'm amazed that police haven't used this on occasions.
"That’s why in thought, found it hard to believe there was no existing legislation the police could or would be able to use. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was only delayed by a twat of an MP who blocked it at the last reading - will still come into effect when it's next heard though. If there's consent it's hugely different from the disgusting practice of doing so without - personally if pics are being taken with consent there are a lot more eye catching pics I'd rather see "My understanding is that the highly principled MP (not a twat at all) was brave enough to actually object to a bill being passed without any examination or debate, which could see people going to jail for 2 years. Did the proposed bill properly exclude consent? Or accident? Or, as mentioned elsewhere, security cameras? In my opinion, he was quite right to insist that this should be properly examined before becoming law, and not just waved through. Janet xxxxxx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" My understanding is that the highly principled MP (not a twat at all) was brave enough to actually object to a bill being passed without any examination or debate, which could see people going to jail for 2 years. Did the proposed bill properly exclude consent? Or accident? Or, as mentioned elsewhere, security cameras? In my opinion, he was quite right to insist that this should be properly examined before becoming law, and not just waved through. Janet xxxxxx " As far as I could tell he was protesting about the process by which laws are waved through in general, rather than as applied in this case. Might have been wise to pick a less sensitive subject though. It was obvious that certain sections of the media and certain politicians would spin it as "Tory mp believes upskirting should be legal". | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Taking any pics without permission is a violation, if it does become illegal then the punishment will still be pathetic " Any pics whatsoever? Or upskirt. Taking pictures in a public place of anyone with or without permission is totally legal. And should remain so. You'd end up with very bland newspapers and TV news otherwise... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was only delayed by a twat of an MP who blocked it at the last reading - will still come into effect when it's next heard though. If there's consent it's hugely different from the disgusting practice of doing so without - personally if pics are being taken with consent there are a lot more eye catching pics I'd rather see
My understanding is that the highly principled MP (not a twat at all) was brave enough to actually object to a bill being passed without any examination or debate, which could see people going to jail for 2 years. Did the proposed bill properly exclude consent? Or accident? Or, as mentioned elsewhere, security cameras? In my opinion, he was quite right to insist that this should be properly examined before becoming law, and not just waved through.
Janet xxxxxx "Good answer, food for thought. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was only delayed by a twat of an MP who blocked it at the last reading - will still come into effect when it's next heard though. If there's consent it's hugely different from the disgusting practice of doing so without - personally if pics are being taken with consent there are a lot more eye catching pics I'd rather see "You can guess what that MP does in his spare time... It's wrong on so many levels and should be classed as sexual assault and have a suitable prison sentence. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
