Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would really like to know the actual legal position on this; not anecdotal or hearsay. If an employer found out you were on this site could they sack you?" Depends on your contract I imagine. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would really like to know the actual legal position on this; not anecdotal or hearsay. If an employer found out you were on this site could they sack you?" The answer is far more complex than yes or no. There are way too many variables. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would really like to know the actual legal position on this; not anecdotal or hearsay. If an employer found out you were on this site could they sack you? The answer is far more complex than yes or no. There are way too many variables. " I agree with this, should have said same in the above | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It would depend on what your job is and what your contract of employment was. In theory, possibly yes, if your being here was like to put you in breach of contract, by say, bringing your employer into disrepute. As with all things I guess, discretion is the key ." So if being on fab and bringing your employer into disrepute for people having sex with other people would that be the same for being on other apps where folk look for sex Tind** for example? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would really like to know the actual legal position on this; not anecdotal or hearsay. If an employer found out you were on this site could they sack you?" This isn’t easy to answer, but here goes. If you are using a corporate device and based in the U.K. then yes there is a high chance you will be violating their privacy and HR policies. However you would need to check. If you are in a government role and or a private role that involves being vetted above DBS then as long as you are transparent and honest you will learn during the vetting process. If you fail to disclose and something happens there is a high chance of dismissal due to anti-bribery act. This all said employers are more diverse now than ever before hence LGBTQI+ community | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why do people sign up to such ridiculous controlling contracts, who the hell do they think they are Surely it would never ever feature in a contract though ?" It's not that specific, it's about bringing the company, or in some cases, the professional body in to disrepute. At the moment we still have human rights legislation that gives us a legal right to a private life which gives everyone some security. But if yiu are on a free and public swingers site arguably yiu have already made your private life public. It's complex. If soneone outed yiu. No you probably couldn't be sacked. If yiu went to a club, no you probably couldn't be sacked. Be easily identifiable on a swingers site or even worse make your profession known you're potentially on very thin ice | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why do people sign up to such ridiculous controlling contracts, who the hell do they think they are Surely it would never ever feature in a contract though ?" Because I need a house over my head. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why do people sign up to such ridiculous controlling contracts, who the hell do they think they are Surely it would never ever feature in a contract though ?" What's ridiculous? I signed a contract with a reputational disrepute clause once. Swinging wasn't specifically mentioned but examples given included d*unken behaviour at work/networking events, mis-use of social media (sharing of extreme views, inflammatory statements etc), and indiscreet communications such as third party heresay about individuals or rival companies that could be classed as libellous or unprofessional. If your job is dealing with individuals and contracts worth millions to a business they want you to be seen as professional and respectful at all times, including when not at work. Likewise teachers or anyone working with children would be in a tricky situation should angry parents start withdrawing their offspring from a school childcare business or playgroup because your lifestyle offended their personal beliefs. Fair? Probably not. But it doesn't need to be specifically worded for it to become an issue with employers. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have it that any company device used to access adult, dating, gambling or gaming sites can lead to dismissal " I dubt there are any employers who don't | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know that, if you work for any of the security services (like MI5) your internet activity and contacts will be regularly monitored -- you'd be forced to sign away your privacy as part of your work contract. Potentially it'll cause them concern -- but whether they'd consider it as a security risk, I'm not sure." Depends upon your clearance level. As to the original question, too many factors to give a categorical answer, but probably. Or they’d find another excuse. Bringing the company into disrepute, probably. Using company equipment would be an open goal, and a really stupid thing to do. If you do this, they already know. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve been pulled up for Fb before. And my mate didn’t get hired because his public Fb had a photo of someone spark out d*unk with a sausage roll jammed up his arse at a party. " Was he interviewing for Gregg's and it was a competitors sausage roll? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve been pulled up for Fb before. And my mate didn’t get hired because his public Fb had a photo of someone spark out d*unk with a sausage roll jammed up his arse at a party. Was he interviewing for Gregg's and it was a competitors sausage roll?" Thanks. Coffee on the keyboard again..... A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve been pulled up for Fb before. And my mate didn’t get hired because his public Fb had a photo of someone spark out d*unk with a sausage roll jammed up his arse at a party. Was he interviewing for Gregg's and it was a competitors sausage roll? Thanks. Coffee on the keyboard again..... A" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It would depend on what your job is and what your contract of employment was. In theory, possibly yes, if your being here was like to put you in breach of contract, by say, bringing your employer into disrepute. As with all things I guess, discretion is the key . So if being on fab and bringing your employer into disrepute for people having sex with other people would that be the same for being on other apps where folk look for sex Tind** for example?" fairly sure yes, if it was seen to bring employer into disrepute, i.e. company name on clothing in pics etc | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve been pulled up for Fb before. And my mate didn’t get hired because his public Fb had a photo of someone spark out d*unk with a sausage roll jammed up his arse at a party. " Was he surprised he didnt get the job? i am not!!! lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was he surprised he didnt get the job? i am not!!! lol " Silly sod didn’t think they’d look at his social media as it was not a high level position. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was he surprised he didnt get the job? i am not!!! lol Silly sod didn’t think they’d look at his social media as it was not a high level position. " They probably thought even for a road sweepers job he would not be sober enough!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve been pulled up for Fb before. And my mate didn’t get hired because his public Fb had a photo of someone spark out d*unk with a sausage roll jammed up his arse at a party. " Dud they actually tell him that was the reason? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dud they actually tell him that was the reason? " They told me. I was annoyed at not getting my hiring fee. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve been pulled up for Fb before. And my mate didn’t get hired because his public Fb had a photo of someone spark out d*unk with a sausage roll jammed up his arse at a party. " One of things my kids told at uni was before thinking of looking at jobs. google your self look at what sites you on or linked to etc be it Facebook or other think how things you said or pics your in make you look to a future employer. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why do people sign up to such ridiculous controlling contracts, who the hell do they think they are Surely it would never ever feature in a contract though ? What's ridiculous? I signed a contract with a reputational disrepute clause once. Swinging wasn't specifically mentioned but examples given included d*unken behaviour at work/networking events, mis-use of social media (sharing of extreme views, inflammatory statements etc), and indiscreet communications such as third party heresay about individuals or rival companies that could be classed as libellous or unprofessional. If your job is dealing with individuals and contracts worth millions to a business they want you to be seen as professional and respectful at all times, including when not at work. Likewise teachers or anyone working with children would be in a tricky situation should angry parents start withdrawing their offspring from a school childcare business or playgroup because your lifestyle offended their personal beliefs. Fair? Probably not. But it doesn't need to be specifically worded for it to become an issue with employers. A" What’s ridiculous to me might not be to you! But funny how you mentioned swinging alongside d*unken behaviour, what a shame people see it as something disreputable,this no doubt leads to the majority of profiles hiding face pics which is understandable | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they find you accessing the site at work or using work equipment then it would be treated as Gross Misconduct. If you posted the name of your employer or images of you wearing company branded items then that could also be treated as Gross Misconduct if they argue you have brought the company into disrepute. If you used a company office or vehicle for sexual activities then that would be gross misconduct. If you simply have a profile here and nothing to identify your employer then probably not. You are entitled to a private life. There might be some specific jobs that if it became public knowledge you were on here then you might be fired." I believe are specific jobs where just being on here might get you fired - usually under a “brining the company, career or position under disrepute”. Usually jobs in the public eye or where the key stakeholders might be the public, or where you hold a position of trust - teacher, social worker, care worker etc. Also, using your uniform or your position as a uniformed service, (military, police, emergency service etc) for anything other than the duty you’re employed to do can get you fired. This is one. as ex forces myself, I particular endorse, and truly hate seeing people on here using theirs for swinging - I find it entirely disrespectful to the service - but that’s an entirely different debate | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If Im standing on my bosses desk jizzing on her face while Terry from servicing is rubbing oily hands on her tits as he does her from behind… how great is it where I work?? " Have they got any vacancies? When can I start , don’t care about the pay | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It would depend on what your job is and what your contract of employment was. In theory, possibly yes, if your being here was like to put you in breach of contract, by say, bringing your employer into disrepute. As with all things I guess, discretion is the key . So if being on fab and bringing your employer into disrepute for people having sex with other people would that be the same for being on other apps where folk look for sex Tind** for example?" FAB and Tinder and any adult site are okay to use BUT no one should mention where they work ..... The bosses do not concern themselves with who individuals have sex with but they do concern themselves with their names being used on such sites and are even more strict about their equipment being used to access sites. In fact ....... anything that can be traced back to the company is a no no . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have it that any company device used to access adult, dating, gambling or gaming sites can lead to dismissal " thats a fair one n cant argue with it ,your employed too work | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would really like to know the actual legal position on this; not anecdotal or hearsay. If an employer found out you were on this site could they sack you?" yes | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In answer to the specific question the Op asked in their opening post... There isn't an employer in the land who would risk dismissing you simply for being a member of this site for fear of being taken to the cleaners in an employment tribunal. " Don't agree. As long as they follow the correct procedure and are not discriminating they would face very little risk at an Employment Tribunal. Also worth remembering that ET's are open to the public and media. A case involving a swinger might just make the news and result on the individual being "outed". | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"yes, it is one of the protected classes in discrimination law.. sex or sexual orientation so this cannot be given as a reason for sacking you.. unless they wanted to give you a big payout as well from the courts." You wouldn't be getting sacked for your sex or sexual orientation though... I doubt you could find an employment case that shows that swinging is a protected characteristic particularly if the employer can argue you brought the company into disrepute or breached trust and confidence. To assume protection for swinging under the Equality Act is niaive. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"yes, it is one of the protected classes in discrimination law.. sex or sexual orientation so this cannot be given as a reason for sacking you.. unless they wanted to give you a big payout as well from the courts. You wouldn't be getting sacked for your sex or sexual orientation though... I doubt you could find an employment case that shows that swinging is a protected characteristic particularly if the employer can argue you brought the company into disrepute or breached trust and confidence. To assume protection for swinging under the Equality Act is niaive. " Above is absolutely correct, sexuality and gender are protected characteristics; if an employer dismissed you with any whiff of this then they wouldn’t even go to tribunal, any decent KC would tell them to settle; doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen because it does. Swinging is a lifestyle choice no matter who you are, what you identify as or what sexuality you are; it’s about gross misconduct which opens the door to every sanction including summary dismissal - the sack !! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It would make a good test case.. The Equality Act 2010 says you must not be discriminated against because: you are heterosexual, gay, lesbian or bisexual someone thinks you have a particular sexual orientation (this is known as discrimination by perception) you are connected to someone who has a particular sexual orientation (this is known as discrimination by association) In the Equality Act, sexual orientation includes how you choose to express your sexual orientation, such as through your appearance or the places you visit." You’re talking about sexual orientation not sexual choice or behaviours related to sex; these are totally different things and it’s dangerous to conflate them as the same. Be careful boys and girls | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would really like to know the actual legal position on this; not anecdotal or hearsay. If an employer found out you were on this site could they sack you?" Theres usually a clause in employment contracts about bringing the company into disrepute. So possibly in certain circumstances... But id imagine very unlikely.having said that im no lawyer. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve been pulled up for Fb before. And my mate didn’t get hired because his public Fb had a photo of someone spark out d*unk with a sausage roll jammed up his arse at a party. Was he interviewing for Gregg's and it was a competitors sausage roll?" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would really like to know the actual legal position on this; not anecdotal or hearsay. If an employer found out you were on this site could they sack you?" I would of thought if the job one did would attract black-mail, if one was discovered swinging. But In this day and age would it really matter. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It would make a good test case.. The Equality Act 2010 says you must not be discriminated against because: you are heterosexual, gay, lesbian or bisexual someone thinks you have a particular sexual orientation (this is known as discrimination by perception) you are connected to someone who has a particular sexual orientation (this is known as discrimination by association) In the Equality Act, sexual orientation includes how you choose to express your sexual orientation, such as through your appearance or the places you visit." Swinging isn't a sexual orientation. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why do people sign up to such ridiculous controlling contracts, who the hell do they think they are Surely it would never ever feature in a contract though ?" Many employers have terms in their contract that can terminate your job for bringing company into disrepute, misusing work equipment or offending colleagues. It would fiercely narrow your job opportunities if you avoided all employers who did so. A good example is the number of people on here with pictures in identifiable work uniforms (construction, NHS, police). One screenshot and that could be your p45. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It would depend on what your job is and what your contract of employment was. In theory, possibly yes, if your being here was like to put you in breach of contract, by say, bringing your employer into disrepute. As with all things I guess, discretion is the key . So if being on fab and bringing your employer into disrepute for people having sex with other people would that be the same for being on other apps where folk look for sex Tind** for example?" Yes definitely if your pictures happened to identify your workplace or you were accessing from work equipment and messages were explicit. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One answer to the question might be; "Would you contest this in a court of Law"?? Another answer might be; "Is being a member of swingers site an illegal activity"? " Probably as relevant . "does it contravene your contract of employment?" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If an employer found out you were on this site could they sack you?" How would they find you? Depending on the answer to this could be significant. Photos in company clothing, uniforms, etc. could be deemed to be “bringing the company into disrepute” which covers a wide range of sins. You could be bragging about where you work, and this could get back to your employer. Reputational damage is big news at the moment. Just ask the CBI. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would really like to know the actual legal position on this; not anecdotal or hearsay. If an employer found out you were on this site could they sack you?" If you were browsing Fab while you should be flying a plane...? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If using company laptop or phone, then they probably have rules against personal use, which they can enforce in situations like this. If it’s using a private device you access then it depends if you were overseen and the content was described as explicit, then that too could be a issue with misconduct. If you told people at the workplace or it became known, that you indulge in a swinger lifestyle, then unless you are a catholic priest (for which you may earn a promotion), it shouldn’t be a problem. " lol haha love the sense of humour haha xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve been pulled up for Fb before. And my mate didn’t get hired because his public Fb had a photo of someone spark out d*unk with a sausage roll jammed up his arse at a party. Was he interviewing for Gregg's and it was a competitors sausage roll?" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve been pulled up for Fb before. And my mate didn’t get hired because his public Fb had a photo of someone spark out d*unk with a sausage roll jammed up his arse at a party. Having a sausage roll up your arsenal? It's a free country, whatever turns you on. Having that photo on a public FB page - I wouldn't want to line manage someone who thought this was OK " Arse, not Arsenal | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would really like to know the actual legal position on this; not anecdotal or hearsay. If an employer found out you were on this site could they sack you?" Personally no... I'm self employed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And for clarity I’m speaking from experience." Shit that must have been hard for you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know that, if you work for any of the security services (like MI5) your internet activity and contacts will be regularly monitored -- you'd be forced to sign away your privacy as part of your work contract. Potentially it'll cause them concern -- but whether they'd consider it as a security risk, I'm not sure." I have DV clearance and they are fine as long as you are honest about it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Depends on your employers social media policy, but alsoif nothing involves your work place then no you cannot be sacked for it." If you’re employed then whatever you do outside of work “involves your workplace”, it’s naive to think otherwise. Any employer who thinks you’ve embarrassed the organisation is likely to reprimand you or even dismiss for gross misconduct; saying “it’s nothing to do with work” won’t save you if an employer thinks differently! Might seem unfair/unreasonable and it arguably is, that said, once you’re fired then try and prove otherwise at tribunal. My experience and counsel is to keep Fab entirely away from the workplace, remove any risk; as others have suggested, workplace clothing etc is a total ted flag! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only incident I have come across of anyone actually being sacked for being on Fab was a police officer a few years ago who, naively, posted pics of himself in his uniform but also, I seem to recall crucially, his badge numbers. Again, if memory is correct this was a gross breach of police officer protocol. Whether he was indulging in Fab (or even just accessing the site) whilst on active duty I can't remember. But it certainly cost him his job. Other than that I've not heard of anything. I do know a university lecturer on here and they have to "vet" anyone they communicate with as they can't be a student of theirs. Any contact, albeit even innocent, they have to declare to their colleagues, which could get a tad awkward of course. Like others have commented there are often rules on using company phones and laptops etc... but I have not, to date, ever heard of anyone actually being sacked for that. " If this is accurate. Am i the only one to see the irony of a police officer being canned for being on fab when the 100s of racist, misogynist etc others remain. Slightly off piste i know. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only incident I have come across of anyone actually being sacked for being on Fab was a police officer a few years ago who, naively, posted pics of himself in his uniform but also, I seem to recall crucially, his badge numbers. Again, if memory is correct this was a gross breach of police officer protocol. Whether he was indulging in Fab (or even just accessing the site) whilst on active duty I can't remember. But it certainly cost him his job. Other than that I've not heard of anything. I do know a university lecturer on here and they have to "vet" anyone they communicate with as they can't be a student of theirs. Any contact, albeit even innocent, they have to declare to their colleagues, which could get a tad awkward of course. Like others have commented there are often rules on using company phones and laptops etc... but I have not, to date, ever heard of anyone actually being sacked for that. If this is accurate. Am i the only one to see the irony of a police officer being canned for being on fab when the 100s of racist, misogynist etc others remain. Slightly off piste i know. " He posted a photo in full uniform, number showing, alongside his car (jam sandwich not personal) and was asking women to meet him for 'outside fun' in his uniform. Not sure if he got sacked for gross misconduct or just pure, unadulterated stupidity! A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only incident I have come across of anyone actually being sacked for being on Fab was a police officer a few years ago who, naively, posted pics of himself in his uniform but also, I seem to recall crucially, his badge numbers. Again, if memory is correct this was a gross breach of police officer protocol. Whether he was indulging in Fab (or even just accessing the site) whilst on active duty I can't remember. But it certainly cost him his job. Other than that I've not heard of anything. I do know a university lecturer on here and they have to "vet" anyone they communicate with as they can't be a student of theirs. Any contact, albeit even innocent, they have to declare to their colleagues, which could get a tad awkward of course. Like others have commented there are often rules on using company phones and laptops etc... but I have not, to date, ever heard of anyone actually being sacked for that. If this is accurate. Am i the only one to see the irony of a police officer being canned for being on fab when the 100s of racist, misogynist etc others remain. Slightly off piste i know. He posted a photo in full uniform, number showing, alongside his car (jam sandwich not personal) and was asking women to meet him for 'outside fun' in his uniform. Not sure if he got sacked for gross misconduct or just pure, unadulterated stupidity! A" I think thats helped answer the ops question. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only incident I have come across of anyone actually being sacked for being on Fab was a police officer a few years ago who, naively, posted pics of himself in his uniform but also, I seem to recall crucially, his badge numbers. Again, if memory is correct this was a gross breach of police officer protocol. Whether he was indulging in Fab (or even just accessing the site) whilst on active duty I can't remember. But it certainly cost him his job. Other than that I've not heard of anything. I do know a university lecturer on here and they have to "vet" anyone they communicate with as they can't be a student of theirs. Any contact, albeit even innocent, they have to declare to their colleagues, which could get a tad awkward of course. Like others have commented there are often rules on using company phones and laptops etc... but I have not, to date, ever heard of anyone actually being sacked for that. " Yes your memory is pretty much accurate. I too remembered reading about this in the local news and have found this article from the Yorkshire Evening Post. This article most definitely answers the OP's question... . Former West Yorkshire Police officer ‘ashamed’ after posting indecent photo on swingers’ website A former West Yorkshire Police officer said he was “ashamed, embarrassed and disgusted” after he posted an indecent photo of himself on a swingers’ website. By Georgina Morris Published 19th Jul 2021 Former PC Andrew Bell uploaded one image to the Fab Swingers website of himself in uniform, with his warrant card, and another of him naked. On Monday, an independent panel at a police misconduct hearing in Wakefield found gross misconduct proven against PC Bell and said he would have been sacked if he had not already resigned. The panel found PC Bell to have breached professional standards of behaviour for authority, respect and courtesy, and discreditable conduct. The hearing was told that the pictures on the swingers’ website were discovered after they were seen and reported in an anonymous message from a member of the public in June 2020. PC Bell, who did not attend the hearing, previously admitted that the Fab Swingers account was his and that both the photographs were of himself. Mike Percival, a solicitor for West Yorkshire Police, said: “He repeatedly said that he was ashamed, embarrassed and disgusted by his behaviour.” | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only incident I have come across of anyone actually being sacked for being on Fab was a police officer a few years ago who, naively, posted pics of himself in his uniform but also, I seem to recall crucially, his badge numbers. Again, if memory is correct this was a gross breach of police officer protocol. Whether he was indulging in Fab (or even just accessing the site) whilst on active duty I can't remember. But it certainly cost him his job. Other than that I've not heard of anything. I do know a university lecturer on here and they have to "vet" anyone they communicate with as they can't be a student of theirs. Any contact, albeit even innocent, they have to declare to their colleagues, which could get a tad awkward of course. Like others have commented there are often rules on using company phones and laptops etc... but I have not, to date, ever heard of anyone actually being sacked for that. Yes your memory is pretty much accurate. I too remembered reading about this in the local news and have found this article from the Yorkshire Evening Post. This article most definitely answers the OP's question... . Former West Yorkshire Police officer ‘ashamed’ after posting indecent photo on swingers’ website A former West Yorkshire Police officer said he was “ashamed, embarrassed and disgusted” after he posted an indecent photo of himself on a swingers’ website. By Georgina Morris Published 19th Jul 2021 Former PC Andrew Bell uploaded one image to the Fab Swingers website of himself in uniform, with his warrant card, and another of him naked. On Monday, an independent panel at a police misconduct hearing in Wakefield found gross misconduct proven against PC Bell and said he would have been sacked if he had not already resigned. The panel found PC Bell to have breached professional standards of behaviour for authority, respect and courtesy, and discreditable conduct. The hearing was told that the pictures on the swingers’ website were discovered after they were seen and reported in an anonymous message from a member of the public in June 2020. PC Bell, who did not attend the hearing, previously admitted that the Fab Swingers account was his and that both the photographs were of himself. Mike Percival, a solicitor for West Yorkshire Police, said: “He repeatedly said that he was ashamed, embarrassed and disgusted by his behaviour.” " Well hopefully the shag he had was worth it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From another angle also depends on the strength of you Trade Union if you do get into hot water, especially if the grounds are a little tenuous. I know of many accounts of where my Trade Union and the legal firm that works on its behalf have successfully defended others when the company has tried to get rid of them. It's times like these your Union membership pays for its self and makes employers think twice." I had an instance where a troll emailed the company y I worked for telling them I was on here and also sent links to it all, got pulled in an questioned an said it’s fcuk all to do with the company what I do in my private life as long as I don’t use anything or take pics on company property, police got involved and the troll was in court for sending revenge porn, the company were ok an said just be careful in the future | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would really like to know the actual legal position on this; not anecdotal or hearsay. If an employer found out you were on this site could they sack you?" Probably just a warning if your are browsing with work phone or PC, or using company wireless. Otherwise, not their business. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would really like to know the actual legal position on this; not anecdotal or hearsay. If an employer found out you were on this site could they sack you?" Not really, unless 1. You access Fab from work on a work device 2. Wear your uniform or show your work logo in Fab pics 3. You pursue someone on Fab who also works at the same place and you KNOW he/she works at your company (would be construed as harassment). This is, of course, only if he/she lodges a complaint with HR 4. If you use the workplace wifi to access Fab even if it's on your phone or own laptop. Most likely Fab will be blocked but not every company will 5. If someone "outs" you and you have naked pics with face showing you MAY have some problems Out of all of these, only (3) is the one that poses a REAL risk of you getting fired. For the rest, HR will have a fair bit of work to do to show that you brought into disrepute. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes it does feature in many contracts of employment; including who you can and can’t have a relationship with. To be fair, these restrictions are typically in “service agreements” which most (not all) Directors sign, in effect, they make all entitlements under employment legislation virtually null and void unless it’s a protected characteristic. Typical employee contracts talk about gross misconduct and typically bringing the company into disrepute covers a multitude of good practice behaviours as well as untold sins if your employers thinks you’ve acted unprofessionally. Only way around such instances is to resign and cite constructive dismissal, it’s usually incumbent on an employer to prove this wasn’t the case at tribunal; if you get caught and wait to be fired then you’ve got to prove it was unfair dismissal which is nigh on impossible at tribunal if an employer has followed process. Argue the narrative all you want on here but the above is stone cold facts, I do this shit for a living " this is incorrect and following your advise is veey high risk and you clearly do t do "this shit" as you put it in the UK , firstly when you resign you put yourself out of work ,you cant claim benifits for 6 months , if you resign and go str8 into another job then there would be no compensation awarded as ETs deal in loss .. thats if you win .. with constructive dissmisal cases the onus is on the claimant to demonstrate that the issuse over which they resigned went to the heart of the contract of employment ... resigning to avoid potencial disciplary action would not be sufficent to bring a case for constructive dismissal . The company does not not have to prove or demonstrate anything .. the first line of the ET3 (responce) would simply state .. the claimant resigned of their own free will .. secondly .. you will in almost all cases be expected to raise a greivance first to reslove any matter in dispute .. if not a tribunal can reject any application .. thirdly when someone is dismissed them employer has to demonstrate that the dismissal was resonable in all circumstances .. your post is irresponsable and inaccurate when talking about UK ET applications and NO ONE should follow this advise | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |