Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What are your biggest turn offs/red flags from other Fabbers? " Anyone who refers to themselves as 'alpha' | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Spectacles on cocks. Or goggly eyes." Yes lol !!! Why???? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Status updates announcing various stages of their hornyness or disappointment with fab, men, women or human kind in general." Runs away and quickly changes status… | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Basically anyone who clearly hasn't read our profile but still message anyway. " Oh the irony, subject line is "What about a profile gives you the ick?" yet you post about people not reading your profile. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Couples profiles who regularly post statuses, allegedly from the wife, asking for someone to come and fuck her man. Clearly a single bloke. Lou x " This and the "couples" profile where the husband messages to get a meet, or basically using a couples profile to circumvent couples only blocks. Always report as a singles profile. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What are your biggest turn offs/red flags from other Fabbers? Anyone who refers to themselves as 'alpha' " Aye..someone's over compensating lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Spectacles on cocks. Or goggly eyes." I can’t stop thinking about spectacles on cocks now haha x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me it’s not a red flag just ick… Men in womens undies" I have to agree, it’s a turn off for me too. Lou x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Status updates announcing various stages of their hornyness or disappointment with fab, men, women or human kind in general. Runs away and quickly changes status…" Noooo! I’m only on Fab for your status updates | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Declarations of being 'straight' and putting down others in the process. Also capital letters, why are you shouting." I get a lot of messages from 'straight' men. If we had sex it wouldn't be straight sex... Green flag though, openly bi guys. The confidence in their sexuality is hot | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'White swingers only, not racist just a preference ' " I don't think it is. Spoke to a girl who tried and said her reasons why she didn't want BBC.. Nothing racist in her words plus she had tried be saying she didn't like.. Plus it's a predominantly white site.. Plus works both ways. There's women saying only black cock. Are they not racist because they are white??? Or again just preference. Only racist if they've never been with what they decline. So yh maybe a high percentage but not all. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'White swingers only, not racist just a preference ' I don't think it is. Spoke to a girl who tried and said her reasons why she didn't want BBC.. Nothing racist in her words plus she had tried be saying she didn't like.. Plus it's a predominantly white site.. Plus works both ways. There's women saying only black cock. Are they not racist because they are white??? Or again just preference. Only racist if they've never been with what they decline. So yh maybe a high percentage but not all. " Only racist if they’ve been with what they decline? How does that work?! There are physical attributes we all find attractive or unattractive in people, your theory would mean we would all have to shag people we’re not attracted to so we’re not deemed as prejudiced in any way. I.e. Can a man only say he doesn’t want a bigger lady if he’s been with bigger ladies? Can a woman only say she doesn’t want a short man if she’s been with short men? If you’re not attracted to certain hair colours/sizes/races/heights/ages etc. that’s your preference. Lou x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'White swingers only, not racist just a preference ' I don't think it is. Spoke to a girl who tried and said her reasons why she didn't want BBC.. Nothing racist in her words plus she had tried be saying she didn't like.. Plus it's a predominantly white site.. Plus works both ways. There's women saying only black cock. Are they not racist because they are white??? Or again just preference. Only racist if they've never been with what they decline. So yh maybe a high percentage but not all. Only racist if they’ve been with what they decline? How does that work?! There are physical attributes we all find attractive or unattractive in people, your theory would mean we would all have to shag people we’re not attracted to so we’re not deemed as prejudiced in any way. I.e. Can a man only say he doesn’t want a bigger lady if he’s been with bigger ladies? Can a woman only say she doesn’t want a short man if she’s been with short men? If you’re not attracted to certain hair colours/sizes/races/heights/ages etc. that’s your preference. Lou x " The thing I find interesting about the specific no on certain races is for example not all black people look the same, so what is it specifically about black people that does not turn you on? I feel there's something deeper there that people aren't willing to discuss because they know they will get criticised for it. No bald/hairy/short/fat etc I can understand because they are specific things, but how do you say a whole race or races or people are not your bag? I'm not accusing people of being racist, nobody is obligated to find anyone attractive but there's definitely more to it than 'it's just what I like'. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'White swingers only, not racist just a preference ' I don't think it is. Spoke to a girl who tried and said her reasons why she didn't want BBC.. Nothing racist in her words plus she had tried be saying she didn't like.. Plus it's a predominantly white site.. Plus works both ways. There's women saying only black cock. Are they not racist because they are white??? Or again just preference. Only racist if they've never been with what they decline. So yh maybe a high percentage but not all. Only racist if they’ve been with what they decline? How does that work?! There are physical attributes we all find attractive or unattractive in people, your theory would mean we would all have to shag people we’re not attracted to so we’re not deemed as prejudiced in any way. I.e. Can a man only say he doesn’t want a bigger lady if he’s been with bigger ladies? Can a woman only say she doesn’t want a short man if she’s been with short men? If you’re not attracted to certain hair colours/sizes/races/heights/ages etc. that’s your preference. Lou x The thing I find interesting about the specific no on certain races is for example not all black people look the same, so what is it specifically about black people that does not turn you on? I feel there's something deeper there that people aren't willing to discuss because they know they will get criticised for it. No bald/hairy/short/fat etc I can understand because they are specific things, but how do you say a whole race or races or people are not your bag? I'm not accusing people of being racist, nobody is obligated to find anyone attractive but there's definitely more to it than 'it's just what I like'." My point was you don’t need to have sex with people you’re not attracted to in order to say you’re not attracted to them. Me? As a short fat person, I’ll take what I can get. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Basically anyone who clearly hasn't read our profile but still message anyway. Oh the irony, subject line is "What about a profile gives you the ick?" yet you post about people not reading your profile. " Yes so their profile immediately gives us the ick as if they can't manage that then they aren't for us... not hard to understand but maybe irony is for some. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'White swingers only, not racist just a preference ' I don't think it is. Spoke to a girl who tried and said her reasons why she didn't want BBC.. Nothing racist in her words plus she had tried be saying she didn't like.. Plus it's a predominantly white site.. Plus works both ways. There's women saying only black cock. Are they not racist because they are white??? Or again just preference. Only racist if they've never been with what they decline. So yh maybe a high percentage but not all. Only racist if they’ve been with what they decline? How does that work?! There are physical attributes we all find attractive or unattractive in people, your theory would mean we would all have to shag people we’re not attracted to so we’re not deemed as prejudiced in any way. I.e. Can a man only say he doesn’t want a bigger lady if he’s been with bigger ladies? Can a woman only say she doesn’t want a short man if she’s been with short men? If you’re not attracted to certain hair colours/sizes/races/heights/ages etc. that’s your preference. Lou x The thing I find interesting about the specific no on certain races is for example not all black people look the same, so what is it specifically about black people that does not turn you on? I feel there's something deeper there that people aren't willing to discuss because they know they will get criticised for it. No bald/hairy/short/fat etc I can understand because they are specific things, but how do you say a whole race or races or people are not your bag? I'm not accusing people of being racist, nobody is obligated to find anyone attractive but there's definitely more to it than 'it's just what I like'." I really think it’s how people word it in their profiles that can make it appear racist rather than preference. I generally find I’m more attracted to darker skin upon first impressions but personality is way more important regardless of race. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too much negativity - A long list of what they’re not looking for and don’t like rather than simply saying what they do want…. " This! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Aggressively negative profiles with a long list of what they're not looking for or which hoops need to be jumped in the first message." Yes, this -- although when you realise the enormous amount of junk that some women get, it's hardly surprising they end up cynical. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Aggressively negative profiles with a long list of what they're not looking for or which hoops need to be jumped in the first message. Yes, this -- although when you realise the enormous amount of junk that some women get, it's hardly surprising they end up cynical. " Thing is, many don't read profiles, so how much difference will it make? and those that do read and also fit their criteria may well be put off with the lack of friendliness. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone who specifies clean/smells good. This does not need saying." Sadly, it sometimes does -- not from this site, but over the years I've had some bad experiences with this. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone who specifies clean/smells good. This does not need saying. Sadly, it sometimes does -- not from this site, but over the years I've had some bad experiences with this. " I agree but it doesn’t always work. I had a social with a guy who had “impeccable hygiene” on his profile and demanded the same. Sadly I had to keep edging away from him in the cafe as he had terrible bad breath. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'White swingers only, not racist just a preference ' I don't think it is. Spoke to a girl who tried and said her reasons why she didn't want BBC.. Nothing racist in her words plus she had tried be saying she didn't like.. Plus it's a predominantly white site.. Plus works both ways. There's women saying only black cock. Are they not racist because they are white??? Or again just preference. Only racist if they've never been with what they decline. So yh maybe a high percentage but not all. " Agree with the above poster. I like white men but I already have a regular BBC and I have slept with all races in my time, more than just once or twice. Its not about racism at all. It annoys me when people pull that card and become abusive, especially as I am from a very mixed heritage myself. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh and a couple's profile with no male pics. Mrs" Yes! This... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Basically anyone who clearly hasn't read our profile but still message anyway. If they spent 2mins having a look they would know they are way off what we would be interested in. Just why The ones who we can tell actually have read it we always try and reply even if it's a polite no thanks." This. Also when they say they've read it and say something in their message which states on your profile you're not into or not looking | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[original quote] 'White swingers only, not racist just a preference" [follow up quote] I don't think it is. Spoke to a girl who tried and said her reasons why she didn't want BBC.. Nothing racist in her words plus she had tried be saying she didn't like.. Plus it's a predominantly white site.. Plus works both ways. There's women saying only black cock. Are they not racist because they are white??? Or again just preference. Only racist if they've never been with what they decline. So yh maybe a high percentage but not all. " Well there's so much to pick through here .. " Spoke to a girl who tried and said her reasons why she didn't want BBC.. Nothing racist in her words plus she had tried be saying she didn't like.. " Right .... so a girl told you something so that must be right. And did she try all non white swingers or just one BBC? Did she also dislike big white cocks or big asian cocks? What was it that she explained that was so reasonable I'd love to hear it. "Plus it's a predominantly white site.. " So you only go for the group that's predominant? Does that mean you only go with white guys. It's a predominantly white male membership isn't it? "Plus works both ways. There's women saying only black cock. Are they not racist because they are white??? " Let me get some clarity here. Are you saying it can't be racist because other people do something similar? The original quote is highlighting that they see "white swingers only" as a red flag. Why are you so keen to say they are wrong? Genuine questions and I'm interested in your thoughts on this. Thanks, Gbat | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Men with thier tongue stuck out ! Spunk pics , yuk ! Men bending over showing Thier hole " oh and any sign of smegma is a total no go too !!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What are your biggest turn offs/red flags from other Fabbers? " Scruffy dirty house | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I should add that I despair when I see those cut and paste stupid legal warnings. A few things " ... take legal action." No they won't. "Publicly traded entity" No it isn't. You can't buy shares here. "Facebook is publicly traded entity" It's not even this fucking site! And even if it were, it's still not traded publicly. "[a list of numbers]" What do they think those numbers even stand for? Get a grip. Gbat " Love this! Goes to show people really follow things blindly without asking themselves why they are doing it, doesn’t it? A few of mine: Shouty entitled profiles from women, who have lost sense of reality because of the oversized attention they get from men who want sex. It’s never “I am this person and this is what I am looking for” but instead “you should be this, this and this and this is not what I am looking for”. Then you look at their pics and what they are asking and what they look like doesn’t even add up. I tend to read profiles in detail before I look at the pics to see if it adds up and often times it doesn’t. Like how are you looking for muscular, 6ft plus only, when you are 5’3””, overweight, 420 friendly [often (not always)a signifier of laziness] and in a bed sit. Just because men want you for sex doesn’t mean you have to lose all sense of logic and reality. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shouty entitled profiles from women, who have lost sense of reality because of the oversized attention they get from men who want sex." I think this happens on vanilla dating sites too -- but I also blame the men for creating this warped sense of reality. I've been around the Internet since 1995 and have seen the way men behave -- copy and paste messages, persistence in spite of zero interest, telling average women how stunning they are, plus lying about their own societal status etc. Men really can be like dogs begging for a crumb of attention like they've never been fed. If they behaved themselves a bit better, things would be a lot more balanced. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Single male accounts, with countless photos of him shagging other women. So you know where to stick it, well done. Next....." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Men really can be like dogs… If [men]behaved themselves a bit better, things would be a lot more balanced" Meh! Chicken/Egg. Gbat | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |