FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

Circumsized or not

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Yes, its not all about the cock the guy has to meet your other preferences inc size, stiffness, etc, etc.

My wifes only had a few circumsized cocks all years ago she said ther was no difference when comparing to uncut on a similar man.

However, I had noted from the feedback from the men that fucked my wife she appeared to be more excited.

Do women note a difference with a cut cock?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uitedSuitorMan
over a year ago

Halifax / Leeds

Tagging on to this thread...purely for research purposes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
over a year ago

Leeds


" I had noted from the feedback from the men that fucked my wife she appeared to be more excited.

"

You could also deduce from this that circumcised men are more likely to exaggerate when describing your wife's excitement ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornyfuckers66Couple
over a year ago

fife

Kinda attached to my foreskin

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I prefer uncut personally, not that I'm against circumsided or anything and it wouldent put me off or anything

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aughtycp1Couple
over a year ago

Leicestershire

Nope I love both. Shiny heads and long forskins that overhang x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

thanks - so by the few posts here makes no big difference.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amdenfunMan
over a year ago

London


" I had noted from the feedback from the men that fucked my wife she appeared to be more excited.

You could also deduce from this that circumcised men are more likely to exaggerate when describing your wife's excitement ? "

Interesting suggestion. Why would circumcised men be more likely to exagerate? Is that due to the represseed effect of the violation all those years ago?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
over a year ago

Leeds


"

Interesting suggestion. Why would circumcised men be more likely to exagerate? Is that due to the represseed effect of the violation all those years ago?"

How does OP know his wife was more excited with the circumcised men other than what they told him ? How could the circumcised men compare his wife's level of excitement to previos times when they hadn't been there ? It all spunds unscientific evidence to me !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm not a fan of foreskin so I would much prefer a circumcised man

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunky GentMan
over a year ago

Maldon and Peterborough

Mine is a bit tight so it looks circumcised when pulled back behind the glans.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uitedSuitorMan
over a year ago

Halifax / Leeds

Circumcised is best...

... completely impartial.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyGentMan
over a year ago

london

I’m circumcised. No complaints yet but people do have their preferences.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Mine is a bit tight so it looks circumcised when pulled back behind the glans. "

Ouch! Tight can be dangerous, especially if you get it caught in your coat zip!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ams12345Man
over a year ago

london

Can’t lie some foreskin looks weird, and some can’t even pull it fully back which is kinda gross cos your defo building up knob cheese.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Can’t lie some foreskin looks weird, and some can’t even pull it fully back which is kinda gross cos your defo building up knob cheese. "

Yep no one likes a cheesy smegma dip

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunky GentMan
over a year ago

Maldon and Peterborough


"Mine is a bit tight so it looks circumcised when pulled back behind the glans.

Ouch! Tight can be dangerous, especially if you get it caught in your coat zip!! "

Then can you please be careful when zipping me up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *anysicoMan
over a year ago

cork

Mine was very tight until a few months ago I had a partial circumcision, fantastic 100% easier to keep it spotless clean , not much heard about partial but it worked a treat for me , happy to talk to anyone about it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etwifeandhim69Couple
over a year ago

Darlington

I got cut for medical reasons about 11 years ago (commando related zipper accident...don't ask).

Absoutely do not recommend it to anyone unless medically required as it desensitised you. I'd say I lost at least 30% sensation.

I don't belive it's anymore or less more hygienic if you shower daily anyway so that's just a myth.

However it certainly does make you last longer. I was a long laster and repeater anyway but I suspect I can last too long sometimes.

As for reception from women...wife loved it and I've never had any complaints from anyone else bar one lady who refused a meet as she didn't like cut dicks. Sorry luv but I couldn't exactly grow it out for you. Met a couple of ladies who really really loved it

It though....they'd never had a cut dick before and they seemed quite interested in checking it out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Mine is a bit tight so it looks circumcised when pulled back behind the glans.

Ouch! Tight can be dangerous, especially if you get it caught in your coat zip!!

Then can you please be careful when zipping me up. "

Sorry hun, just had my nails done

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ussybagderMan
over a year ago

Salford

Uncircumcised =dirty

White stuff comes out when pulling it back

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunky GentMan
over a year ago

Maldon and Peterborough


"Mine is a bit tight so it looks circumcised when pulled back behind the glans.

Ouch! Tight can be dangerous, especially if you get it caught in your coat zip!!

Then can you please be careful when zipping me up.

Sorry hun, just had my nails done "

Best leave it hanging out then.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amdenfunMan
over a year ago

London


"

Interesting suggestion. Why would circumcised men be more likely to exagerate? Is that due to the represseed effect of the violation all those years ago?

How does OP know his wife was more excited with the circumcised men other than what they told him ? How could the circumcised men compare his wife's level of excitement to previos times when they hadn't been there ? It all spunds unscientific evidence to me ! "

Well indeed. This had occured to me too. I'd expected him to describe observed levels of excitement with objective tests as far as possible - e.g. volume of screams; time until orgasm; whether she wants to see the guy again.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hristopherd999Man
over a year ago

Brentwood


" I had noted from the feedback from the men that fucked my wife she appeared to be more excited.

You could also deduce from this that circumcised men are more likely to exaggerate when describing your wife's excitement ? "

All of them?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uitednbooted2Man
over a year ago

Berkshire

I have a foreskin but it fully retracts. Some people think I’ve been circumcised

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orkshrCplCouple
over a year ago

Ripon

Circumcised would be my preference but it's not a prerequisite x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hubby CoupleCouple
over a year ago

Essex

Nobodies mentioned DICK ROLL …for those who don’t know what it is, it’s where your foreskin rolls into itself

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andb69Couple
over a year ago

leeds

Cut or uncut doesn't make much difference to me while fucking (with a condom!) but for wanking and playing an uncut cock is much better, providing the foreskin is fully retractable - I love the feel of sliding back and forth over the helmet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Mine is circumcised - never had any complaints but it has been the cause of a few moans - OK, I'm leaving ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cut or uncut doesn't make much difference to me while fucking (with a condom!) but for wanking and playing an uncut cock is much better, providing the foreskin is fully retractable - I love the feel of sliding back and forth over the helmet. "

This

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Uncircumcised =dirty

White stuff comes out when pulling it back "

No it doesn’t.

Not washing = dirty

Happily uncircumcised, although it only goes about 1/3 down my helmet even fully soft

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Circumcised here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eus n EuropaCouple
over a year ago

warrinton


"Uncircumcised =dirty

White stuff comes out when pulling it back "

With respect that is load of old bow locks I can assure you and anyone else Zeus's cock is absolutly clean.

Whilst iv nothing at all against circumsion, Forskin is natural and if anyones stinks it is because they do not wash it.

Just saying

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *IG G77Man
over a year ago

GATLEY

Circumcised length and girth

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust_FlynnMan
over a year ago

St Neots

Flynns uncircumcised, i honestly can't tell the difference between him and a friend who's cut and very similarly sized when they're both hard. They look and feel identical and last similar times

I genuinely couldnt careless either way, a nice dick is a nice dick whether it's cut or not xx

Elle xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

a few here have mentined 'hygien' - nothing to do with that re cut cock ie if you bath/shower daily and wash properly you are clean cut or no cut and that is a fact

a lame bastard that worked at my place cited his cock was cut becuse its more "hygenic" BS i told him complete BS

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etwifeandhim69Couple
over a year ago

Darlington


"Uncircumcised =dirty

White stuff comes out when pulling it back "

If you can clean yourself properly, that's on you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eyupMan
over a year ago

Bridlington

I’m cut and was cut when I was 19 and yes it hurt lol. Ripped it while having sex before anyone ask, I love the look of it cut but have to admit you do lose the feelings round the tip of your cock but hey ho can’t change it back

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *outhsideGlasgowMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

Well, i aint gonna lie i can cum very quickly during intercourse....you think being circumsized could change that ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *xydadbodMan
over a year ago

Milton keynes

I've been circumcised since I was 4 for medical reason so I can't really say much as I can't really compare. Does it feel less sensitive? I think so

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wmboy22Man
over a year ago

cwmbran


"Well, i aint gonna lie i can cum very quickly during intercourse....you think being circumsized could change that ? "
following this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heeseandWineCouple
over a year ago

Berkshire and Hampshire


"Circumcised here "
And here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *IG G77Man
over a year ago

GATLEY

Circumcised here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *omb2244Man
over a year ago

NYC

Cut here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I prefer a circumcised cock especially for oral play

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *IG G77Man
over a year ago

GATLEY


"I prefer a circumcised cock especially for oral play"

Your welcome anytime

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Uncircumcised =dirty

White stuff comes out when pulling it back "

Hmm good observation, so booger comes out from eye, would help after removing eyelid? Genuinely curious to know

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Uncut here keep him clean is the answer never an issue for me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ungmagic10Man
over a year ago

Northampton


"Uncircumcised =dirty

White stuff comes out when pulling it back

With respect that is load of old bow locks I can assure you and anyone else Zeus's cock is absolutly clean.

Whilst iv nothing at all against circumsion, Forskin is natural and if anyones stinks it is because they do not wash it.

Just saying "

Thank you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rzuuMan
over a year ago

Norwich


"Uncircumcised =dirty

White stuff comes out when pulling it back "

So very wrong.

It's all about hygiene. If you wash properly, then there is no "white stuff".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uenevereWoman
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

[Removed by poster at 24/10/21 17:40:45]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uenevereWoman
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

I like my partners clean, other than that uncut is better for a hand job.

To be honest the whole concept of circumcision makes me uncomfortable. I cannot fathom why any loving parent would agree to an unnecessary operation on their child's penis

It should be illegal unless necessary.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ewey613Man
over a year ago

ottawa

Back in the 1970s-1980s all boys were circumcised automatically.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *reenline49Man
over a year ago

Melbourn

Definitely should be made illegal!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Knight is YoungMan
over a year ago

22 Acacia Ave, Preston-for now

Mine tends to slip back as I get hard

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Uncut for me please

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entakuruMan
over a year ago

Exeter

Mine was done at birth due to being born in a country where it's done to everyone and not even considered an option. I'd prefer to have been left intact but not much I can do about it after the fact.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ollydoesWoman
over a year ago

Shangri-La

Have no preference either way. Its not something ive ever asked. I couldnt even tell you, from who ive met who had and hadnt. I must notice but i can honestly say i cant think of one time ive thought consciously when looking at a cock, oh its cut or oh its un cut. I just see cock.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Circumcised here and prefere circumcised cocks when playing but that dont mean i wont play with guys with a foreskin

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Think n full skin here love it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Back in the 1970s-1980s all boys were circumcised automatically.

"

Not in the U.K. they weren’t.

In all the schools I went to, there were very few circumcised lads.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heDesiCandiTV/TS
over a year ago

Nairobi Kenya and NOT in

Prefer circumcised- I find they are just cleaner - but I won’t turn down a great sex with a fantastic man just because he is uncut

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ord MasonMan
over a year ago

longford


"I'm not a fan of foreskin so I would much prefer a circumcised man "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I like my partners clean, other than that uncut is better for a hand job.

To be honest the whole concept of circumcision makes me uncomfortable. I cannot fathom why any loving parent would agree to an unnecessary operation on their child's penis

It should be illegal unless necessary. "

Are you going to tell the Jews to put an end to thousands of years of tradition then or shall I? I’m sure they’ll stop doing it though as it makes you uncomfortable....

While we’re at it can we tell Christians to lift their ban on sex before marriage as well because I think that’s a weird concept...

And Muslims not being allowed to eat pork is cruel because pork’s so delicious and they’re missing out so that should be scrapped as well...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ames-77Man
over a year ago

milton keynes

Some blokes are uncut and don't have that much foreskin anyway some blokes have a lot ..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I like my partners clean, other than that uncut is better for a hand job.

To be honest the whole concept of circumcision makes me uncomfortable. I cannot fathom why any loving parent would agree to an unnecessary operation on their child's penis

It should be illegal unless necessary.

Are you going to tell the Jews to put an end to thousands of years of tradition then or shall I? I’m sure they’ll stop doing it though as it makes you uncomfortable....

While we’re at it can we tell Christians to lift their ban on sex before marriage as well because I think that’s a weird concept...

And Muslims not being allowed to eat pork is cruel because pork’s so delicious and they’re missing out so that should be scrapped as well..."

What absolute nonsense. So is female genital mutilation fine in the cultures that allow it just because it’s a tradition or ritual?

This is basically male genital mutilation if it is performed of an infant for any reason other than health grounds. If they can’t consent, it should not be done. End of

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Mr is circumised and having been together for 14 years, I'm very used to it.

In my experience, penetration doesn't feel much different, with or without a foreskin. I think that's more to do with girth, length and (most especially) technique.

It absolutely makes a difference to hand jobs and blow jobs because the difference in anatomy means a very slightly different technique is needed.

I prefer cut but I guess that could be 14 years of being intimate with Mr.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urulovesnylonMan
over a year ago

Harrow

Circumcised and not had any complaints so far.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I’m circumcised and never had a issue. Always had positive feedback

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I like my partners clean, other than that uncut is better for a hand job.

To be honest the whole concept of circumcision makes me uncomfortable. I cannot fathom why any loving parent would agree to an unnecessary operation on their child's penis

It should be illegal unless necessary.

Are you going to tell the Jews to put an end to thousands of years of tradition then or shall I? I’m sure they’ll stop doing it though as it makes you uncomfortable....

While we’re at it can we tell Christians to lift their ban on sex before marriage as well because I think that’s a weird concept...

And Muslims not being allowed to eat pork is cruel because pork’s so delicious and they’re missing out so that should be scrapped as well...

What absolute nonsense. So is female genital mutilation fine in the cultures that allow it just because it’s a tradition or ritual?

This is basically male genital mutilation if it is performed of an infant for any reason other than health grounds. If they can’t consent, it should not be done. End of "

They’re not comparable at all, female genital mutilation is a very dangerous procedure that leaves women with long term discomfort, infection, problems with giving birth amongst other things. Circumcision is a simple operation with no health risks at all. I’d never advocate female genital mutilation, even if it is considered a religious tradition, but you really can’t compare the two.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *J GeminiTV/TS
over a year ago

Northumberland

I am and that's the way I like it ,

Xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I like my partners clean, other than that uncut is better for a hand job.

To be honest the whole concept of circumcision makes me uncomfortable. I cannot fathom why any loving parent would agree to an unnecessary operation on their child's penis

It should be illegal unless necessary.

Are you going to tell the Jews to put an end to thousands of years of tradition then or shall I? I’m sure they’ll stop doing it though as it makes you uncomfortable....

While we’re at it can we tell Christians to lift their ban on sex before marriage as well because I think that’s a weird concept...

And Muslims not being allowed to eat pork is cruel because pork’s so delicious and they’re missing out so that should be scrapped as well...

What absolute nonsense. So is female genital mutilation fine in the cultures that allow it just because it’s a tradition or ritual?

This is basically male genital mutilation if it is performed of an infant for any reason other than health grounds. If they can’t consent, it should not be done. End of

They’re not comparable at all, female genital mutilation is a very dangerous procedure that leaves women with long term discomfort, infection, problems with giving birth amongst other things. Circumcision is a simple operation with no health risks at all. I’d never advocate female genital mutilation, even if it is considered a religious tradition, but you really can’t compare the two. "

Yet you can compare circumcision to all the nonsense you compared it to? Doing anything surgical that is physically uneccesary to an infant is abuse. Simple as.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I like my partners clean, other than that uncut is better for a hand job.

To be honest the whole concept of circumcision makes me uncomfortable. I cannot fathom why any loving parent would agree to an unnecessary operation on their child's penis

It should be illegal unless necessary.

Are you going to tell the Jews to put an end to thousands of years of tradition then or shall I? I’m sure they’ll stop doing it though as it makes you uncomfortable....

While we’re at it can we tell Christians to lift their ban on sex before marriage as well because I think that’s a weird concept...

And Muslims not being allowed to eat pork is cruel because pork’s so delicious and they’re missing out so that should be scrapped as well...

What absolute nonsense. So is female genital mutilation fine in the cultures that allow it just because it’s a tradition or ritual?

This is basically male genital mutilation if it is performed of an infant for any reason other than health grounds. If they can’t consent, it should not be done. End of

They’re not comparable at all, female genital mutilation is a very dangerous procedure that leaves women with long term discomfort, infection, problems with giving birth amongst other things. Circumcision is a simple operation with no health risks at all. I’d never advocate female genital mutilation, even if it is considered a religious tradition, but you really can’t compare the two.

Yet you can compare circumcision to all the nonsense you compared it to? Doing anything surgical that is physically uneccesary to an infant is abuse. Simple as. "

I compared them because they’re also religious traditions that I don’t necessarily agree with so if circumcisions should be banned because people outside the religion don’t agree with it then why shouldn’t the other things that I don’t agree with. Surely making young adults feel like sinners for having sex before marriage is a form of abuse too? Telling people what they are and aren’t allowed to eat is a way of controlling them and not allowing them the freedom to make their own choices which is also a form of abuse.

I’m not actually saying that I think circumcising infants is right and I believe it’s as much a form of abuse as the other ways religion controls and manipulates people of faith but what I am saying is that it’s not our place to tell an entire religion that they should stop doing something that’s quite an integral part of their beliefs just because we don’t like it.

I don’t actually believe it is a form of abuse, I was circumcised for medical reasons when I was a young child and it was unpleasant but it hasn’t had any lasting, long term negative affects on me like real abuse would have. To class it as abuse is actually doing an injustice to people who do suffer real abuse that will haunt them for the rest of their lives.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entakuruMan
over a year ago

Exeter

Religion is basically sanctioned delusion and in a secular society there should be absolutely no tolerance of cutting bits off children of any gender because of unproven 'beliefs' or 'faith' that it will somehow improve the life of said child. We have an age of majority for a reason. If an adult wants to alter their genitals or other body parts for reasons of faith then of course it should be allowed, but I would postulate the main reason that these 'traditions' are done to children is of course that by the time they reach adulthood, common sense has kicked in so of course they will die out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Religion is basically sanctioned delusion and in a secular society there should be absolutely no tolerance of cutting bits off children of any gender because of unproven 'beliefs' or 'faith' that it will somehow improve the life of said child. We have an age of majority for a reason. If an adult wants to alter their genitals or other body parts for reasons of faith then of course it should be allowed, but I would postulate the main reason that these 'traditions' are done to children is of course that by the time they reach adulthood, common sense has kicked in so of course they will die out. "

I’ve just done some quick research into why Jews circumcise infant boys and it seems that the reason is actually unknown, there is a story about God telling someone to circumcise all his children but the tradition pre dates this (on a side note...isn’t it weird how God used to talk to people a lot in biblical times but doesn’t do it so much in modern times....). I totally agree with your description of religions but the point still stands that it’s an ancient tradition that, although unpleasant, doesn’t cause any long term pain or suffering. When a priest pours water over a baby’s head during a christening the baby pretty much always cries and it’s obviously not a pleasant experience for them so should this be banned too? I appreciate it’s not the same level of discomfort for the baby but it’s still discomfort.

How do you feel about children having to take part in Ramadan? It’s obviously incredibly difficult for them to fast for so long so should this be banned too?

By the way, please don’t think I’m being argumentative and I hope I don’t sound aggressive at all, it’s hard not to sound aggressive when debating an opposing opinion with texts but I am genuinely just looking for a discussion and not an argument and do listen to other people’s opinions. I can see why people think it’s wrong and I don’t necessarily agree with the tradition but I also respect traditions and am trying to see it from the view of people that follow the tradition.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I still think performing surgery on an infant for no good reason is abuse and isn’t comparable in any way or for to putting water on a child’s head. Personally, I think religion has no place in the modern world, but fat chance of any of it disappearing.

You say it doesn’t cause any long term pain or suffering. What if it does? I’m sure there’s plenty out there with botched circumcisions. Even some of the guys commenting on here look pretty scarred to me, even if they’re not in any discomfort. I’ve seen on TV guys who’ve actually weighted what skin they had to, in effect, grow another foreskin as they felt they should have had the choice.

The whole thing is just weird, outdated and basically child abuse. Just because it’s been done for centuries doesn’t make it right and it should be against the law. You’ll never convince me otherwise no matter what reasoning you bring up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *1bttmMan
over a year ago

Shoreditch east London


"Back in the 1970s-1980s all boys were circumcised automatically.

"

Maybe the case in Canada as I notice that's where u are. But quite opp in UK. The majority where uncut with just a handful of guys I remember being cut.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *1bttmMan
over a year ago

Shoreditch east London


"Uncircumcised =dirty

White stuff comes out when pulling it back "

There's some people that consider having a hairy cock = dirty. The hair traps all the sweat and is unhygienic. Both very naive tbh.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I still think performing surgery on an infant for no good reason is abuse and isn’t comparable in any way or for to putting water on a child’s head. Personally, I think religion has no place in the modern world, but fat chance of any of it disappearing.

You say it doesn’t cause any long term pain or suffering. What if it does? I’m sure there’s plenty out there with botched circumcisions. Even some of the guys commenting on here look pretty scarred to me, even if they’re not in any discomfort. I’ve seen on TV guys who’ve actually weighted what skin they had to, in effect, grow another foreskin as they felt they should have had the choice.

The whole thing is just weird, outdated and basically child abuse. Just because it’s been done for centuries doesn’t make it right and it should be against the law. You’ll never convince me otherwise no matter what reasoning you bring up. "

I did say pouring water on a baby’s head was a much lesser discomfort for baby’s but it’s still a discomfort, where do you draw the line at what discomfort is ok to put a baby through in the name of religion and what isn’t? I do totally agree with you that there’s no good reason for doing it and it’s out dated but I still can’t accept that it’s child abuse, there’s no anger or hatred involved and the child is safe, it seems like an exaggeration to call it that. The fact that Jewish fathers allow their son’s to be circumcised shows that it’s not something they begrudge being done to them.

You’re obviously not a religious person but I bet you celebrate Christmas don’t you? It seems weird and outdated that we celebrate the birth of someone we don’t believe existed but we do it because it’s traditional. A bride wearing a white dress to her wedding to symbolise her virginity is weird and outdated but we still do it because it’s traditional. Having to go to work to provide a service to earn money to pay someone else who’s providing a service is weird and outdated but we still do it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entakuruMan
over a year ago

Exeter


"Religion is basically sanctioned delusion and in a secular society there should be absolutely no tolerance of cutting bits off children of any gender because of unproven 'beliefs' or 'faith' that it will somehow improve the life of said child. We have an age of majority for a reason. If an adult wants to alter their genitals or other body parts for reasons of faith then of course it should be allowed, but I would postulate the main reason that these 'traditions' are done to children is of course that by the time they reach adulthood, common sense has kicked in so of course they will die out.

I’ve just done some quick research into why Jews circumcise infant boys and it seems that the reason is actually unknown, there is a story about God telling someone to circumcise all his children but the tradition pre dates this (on a side note...isn’t it weird how God used to talk to people a lot in biblical times but doesn’t do it so much in modern times....). I totally agree with your description of religions but the point still stands that it’s an ancient tradition that, although unpleasant, doesn’t cause any long term pain or suffering. When a priest pours water over a baby’s head during a christening the baby pretty much always cries and it’s obviously not a pleasant experience for them so should this be banned too? I appreciate it’s not the same level of discomfort for the baby but it’s still discomfort.

How do you feel about children having to take part in Ramadan? It’s obviously incredibly difficult for them to fast for so long so should this be banned too?

By the way, please don’t think I’m being argumentative and I hope I don’t sound aggressive at all, it’s hard not to sound aggressive when debating an opposing opinion with texts but I am genuinely just looking for a discussion and not an argument and do listen to other people’s opinions. I can see why people think it’s wrong and I don’t necessarily agree with the tradition but I also respect traditions and am trying to see it from the view of people that follow the tradition. "

If developing a leathery glans due to the lack of the skin specifically designed to stop that from happening isn't a negative long-term effect, then what is?

I speak from the experience of having had my own removed as a baby. Honestly, I wish that that had not been done to me. The fact I have no experience of life as an 'intact' male shouldn't prevent me from holding a viewpoint that what was done to me would not have happened if I was able to exercise my own power of consent. If there are real, tangible benefits to having said procedure, it should be up to the adult to make that decision about their own body. Comparing pouring a bit of water over a baby's head to cutting functional parts of the anatomy with thousands of nerve endings and a direct result on sexual function as an adult is beyond asinine, sorry.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entakuruMan
over a year ago

Exeter

Religious tolerance is not tolerating adults abusing children and claiming a sky fairy said it's OK. It's allowing individuals to practise their own beliefs and rituals without being persecuted. As soon as it involves cruelty to children then it becomes a hard 'no'. If it were to be proven that total immersion baptism or even just a splash of water on the forehead of a baby could cause long term trauma and associated effects then absolutely it should be banned also.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I did say pouring water on a baby’s head was a much lesser discomfort for baby’s but it’s still a discomfort, where do you draw the line at what discomfort is ok to put a baby through in the name of religion and what isn’t? I do totally agree with you that there’s no good reason for doing it and it’s out dated but I still can’t accept that it’s child abuse, there’s no anger or hatred involved and the child is safe, it seems like an exaggeration to call it that. The fact that Jewish fathers allow their son’s to be circumcised shows that it’s not something they begrudge being done to them.

You’re obviously not a religious person but I bet you celebrate Christmas don’t you? It seems weird and outdated that we celebrate the birth of someone we don’t believe existed but we do it because it’s traditional. A bride wearing a white dress to her wedding to symbolise her virginity is weird and outdated but we still do it because it’s traditional. Having to go to work to provide a service to earn money to pay someone else who’s providing a service is weird and outdated but we still do it. "

Your logic and reasoning is getting even more bizarre. How can you not think cutting the flesh of a child with no good reason isn’t child abuse? I’m sure many child abusers have no hatred or anger when abusing a child, but it’s still abuse.

I’m done with arguing before you bring the Easter bunny into it. Almost all your arguments for tradition are things adults choose. Circumcision isn’t one

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I did say pouring water on a baby’s head was a much lesser discomfort for baby’s but it’s still a discomfort, where do you draw the line at what discomfort is ok to put a baby through in the name of religion and what isn’t? I do totally agree with you that there’s no good reason for doing it and it’s out dated but I still can’t accept that it’s child abuse, there’s no anger or hatred involved and the child is safe, it seems like an exaggeration to call it that. The fact that Jewish fathers allow their son’s to be circumcised shows that it’s not something they begrudge being done to them.

You’re obviously not a religious person but I bet you celebrate Christmas don’t you? It seems weird and outdated that we celebrate the birth of someone we don’t believe existed but we do it because it’s traditional. A bride wearing a white dress to her wedding to symbolise her virginity is weird and outdated but we still do it because it’s traditional. Having to go to work to provide a service to earn money to pay someone else who’s providing a service is weird and outdated but we still do it.

Your logic and reasoning is getting even more bizarre. How can you not think cutting the flesh of a child with no good reason isn’t child abuse? I’m sure many child abusers have no hatred or anger when abusing a child, but it’s still abuse.

I’m done with arguing before you bring the Easter bunny into it. Almost all your arguments for tradition are things adults choose. Circumcision isn’t one"

I did consider bringing Easter into it actually haha. I’m sorry you thought it was an argument, I wasn’t trying to be argumentative, I just wanted to discuss it. I can completely see where your coming from and I knew as I was typing the stuff about Christmas and wedding dresses it was a bit bizarre and I probably should have deleted but I was just trying to show that there are lots of things we do because of tradition that are pointless and outdated, I know we choose to do them but they’re still pointless.

I’ve never actually said that I think it’s ok to circumcise infants unnecessarily, I don’t think it’s on the level of child abuse but I certainly don’t think it’s right, I’ve just been trying to highlight that it’s a tradition that is sacramental to Jews and that shouldn’t be ignored and scoffed at.

I’m not religious at all but I respect people who are and I respect their beliefs and traditions, non of us actually know who’s right, maybe there is a God and I’m wrong for not believing in him/her/it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm circumcised and I think it looks so much nicer,, my personal opinion but everyone is different

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pertureTV/TS
over a year ago

New Ferry, wirral in stockings and sussies

I prefer cut cocks or at least those who can fully pull it back, was cut as a child for medical reasons dont miss it because i dont remember it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

these threads are getting pretty boring now almost weekly people saying guys with forskins are dirty and guys who are cut are too dry ...mines better than your puff chest out the fact is most of us women do give a shit as long as clean and working ... a cut cock can be dirty too those of you where the forskin dont pull back / painful need to see your drs ... a dirty cock is a dirty cock cut or not ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Totally agree personal hygiene is key whatever you have, personally love the feel of skin.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heDesiCandiTV/TS
over a year ago

Nairobi Kenya and NOT in


"these threads are getting pretty boring now almost weekly people saying guys with forskins are dirty and guys who are cut are too dry ...mines better than your puff chest out the fact is most of us women do give a shit as long as clean and working ... a cut cock can be dirty too those of you where the forskin dont pull back / painful need to see your drs ... a dirty cock is a dirty cock cut or not ... "

100%%%

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *triker0079Man
over a year ago

London

Had to get cut in adulthood for medical reasons, and can't complain.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *1c4yMan
over a year ago

stourbridge

Just like ASDAs prices my foreskin rolls back during sex with my partner so it gives the feel of cut anyway. With a condom it doesn't roll back.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Nope I love both. Shiny heads and long forskins that overhang x"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just like ASDAs prices my foreskin rolls back during sex with my partner so it gives the feel of cut anyway. With a condom it doesn't roll back. "

Don’t you pull your foreskin back when you put a condom on ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lyingcoloursMan
over a year ago

canterbury

I’d definitely much prefer having foreskin. Just don’t be grot bag and clean it regularly.. no one likes “Creme de helm” or “Bellendseydale”

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Still got mine and I'm happy with it.

It must help a lot with sensation because when it's pulled back fully it covers about a quarter of the length of my cock and it's by far the most sensitive part (sorry cut guys).

Helps with penetration too. If it's not pulled back it rolls back as it goes in so it makes a tight spot less of a tight spot.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ames-77Man
over a year ago

milton keynes

Am I

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *e 1812Man
over a year ago

Bargoed-ish.


"Back in the 1970s-1980s all boys were circumcised automatically.

I was born in 1971 & I'm not circumcised.

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onB373Man
over a year ago

Berkshire

I am not circumcised. The bell end is very sensitive and sometime you cum quicker than you would like.

I have been pulling the forskin back and slow making it less sensitive. I am at the stage where I can sleep some nights with the forskin back.

I am also able to push it back during the day... so getting there it has taken months to do this..... Do you have any tips to speed thing up

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *mma and ChrisCouple
over a year ago

Greater Manchester

I personally have no preference as I always ask the guys to wash their bits on arrival

If pushed I would say it’s slightly more enjoyable sucking a guy who’s circumcised esp when they cum

But for penetration and sex itself I can’t say I have noticed a difference. As another woman said earlier - I’m concentrating more at that point on how long and thick he is and how deep he is inside me tbh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top