Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And the apparent Muslim on Muslim attack in Quebec has proved just how right he was. It has also made those people signing petitions, and protesting against him look like complete idiots." How? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage" Does he upset you op? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When even Piers Morgan thinks you've gone too far, you know you're a cunt. "  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And the apparent Muslim on Muslim attack in Quebec has proved just how right he was. It has also made those people signing petitions, and protesting against him look like complete idiots. How?" The attack wasn't by muslims...it was against muslims at a mosque! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When even Piers Morgan thinks you've gone too far, you know you're a cunt. " This. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the gunmen who has been arrested was a Moroccan. Do you really believe that he was not a Muslim? From Morocco?" I'm from England. Can you guess what religion I am without knowing me too? I don't know the story your referí g to. But just pointing out how quick you jumped to that conclusion.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage" He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's quite simple, whether you agree with his policies or not... He stated what he was going to do when he was campaigning. He was elected on those promises. He's doing what he said he would do. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK ".. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK "How come the "majority" didn't vote for him? 3 million more votes for Clinton; wasn't it? And, as far as I'm aware, no one in the UK has been asked whether they "back" him so you've just pulled that one out of your arse too. Asking your little friends down the pub doesn't count. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
How come the "majority" didn't vote for him? 3 million more votes for Clinton; wasn't it?
And, as far as I'm aware, no one in the UK has been asked whether they "back" him so you've just pulled that one out of your arse too. Asking your little friends down the pub doesn't count. "you do understand how the voting system in USA works ? or do you wish to change it 
65 million in UK only one million can be arsed to press a button to say they are against his actions, shows me, the majority don't give a fuck and are happy with him, don't you agree
.
my little friends down the pub don't eat crisps, they know what is good, and what is bad for them | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK "So Trumpfans are just going for outright lies, now. Following their hero, I guess. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's quite simple, whether you agree with his policies or not... He stated what he was going to do when he was campaigning. He was elected on those promises. He's doing what he said he would do. " And? I see people saying this a lot, but so what? The fact that a politician gets elected doesn't mean you can't criticise or protest what they're doing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
How come the "majority" didn't vote for him? 3 million more votes for Clinton; wasn't it?
And, as far as I'm aware, no one in the UK has been asked whether they "back" him so you've just pulled that one out of your arse too. Asking your little friends down the pub doesn't count.
you do understand how the voting system in USA works ? or do you wish to change it
"I understand how the voting system in the US works. Regardless of that, he is not supported by the majority. The majority of the votes were not cast for him. He now has the highest disapproval rating in the Gallup polls of any president polled. And he has managed to reach majority disapproval in the ratings in a record 8 days. Smashing Clinton's record of taking 573 days to reach majority disapproval. -Matt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage" Not many men around like Donald, not these days. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage Not many men around like Donald, not these days." ....you're right. .most of them are in jail  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
How come the "majority" didn't vote for him? 3 million more votes for Clinton; wasn't it?
And, as far as I'm aware, no one in the UK has been asked whether they "back" him so you've just pulled that one out of your arse too. Asking your little friends down the pub doesn't count.
you do understand how the voting system in USA works ? or do you wish to change it
65 million in UK only one million can be arsed to press a button to say they are against his actions, shows me, the majority don't give a fuck and are happy with him, don't you agree
.
my little friends down the pub don't eat crisps, they know what is good, and what is bad for them"Well they sound like a barrel of laughs, not that I'm sure what the fuck crisps have to do with anything. I haven't signed that petition, because I don't think we should fete the likes of China and the Saudi Royal family but ban Trump. And I think he should get the state visit and be subjected to endless tirades from Prince Charles about climate change, the cold shoulder from William and Harry after he said he could have fucked their mother, and maybe Kate might allow her children to vomit over one of his delightful suits, after he said it was fair game that the topless sunbathing photos of her were published. That doesn't mean I don't think he is an absolute raging arsehole of incompetence but according to your logic I "back" him and am "happy" with him. And yes, I do understand how the US electoral system works. Which is why I understand that the majority of the popular vote didn't go to him. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
He is saying there is voter fraud, so that's given him the majority then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the gunmen who has been arrested was a Moroccan. Do you really believe that he was not a Muslim? From Morocco? I'm from England. Can you guess what religion I am without knowing me too? I don't know the story your referí g to. But just pointing out how quick you jumped to that conclusion. "Alexandre Bissonette...... that's a really Muslim sounding name (I don't think) but as the attack was in Quebec then maybe French might be a better guess....? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's quite simple, whether you agree with his policies or not... He stated what he was going to do when he was campaigning. He was elected on those promises. He's doing what he said he would do. " Totally agree with you. Trump is a total knobhead.....but this was known before he was elected. He was elected on the basis of being a total knobhead and now he is acting like a total knobhead. People may wish to protest...but let's not pretend we are surprised by any of it! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The majority
He is saying there is voter fraud, so that's given him the majority then?"....and one of his top aides (Steve bannon) was registered to vote in two states,not that he did of course. Donald said he never received any illegal votes. Not one. Ever. And we all know he never lies | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And the apparent Muslim on Muslim attack in Quebec has proved just how right he was. It has also made those people signing petitions, and protesting against him look like complete idiots."  There are millions of muslims live in the US anyway,his actions will probably increase terrorism within the country | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump confuses me. He's a politician who, as they all do, promised things. But he actually appears to be attempting to deliver on his promises. WTF?! "He is not a politition thast maybe why he keeps promises,he was never in politics before he became president | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!!" And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt" Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. " Same tired response from someone of the Jewish faith...... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt" ...but surely no religion stones people to death in this day and age..do they...? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt...but surely no religion stones people to death in this day and age..do they...? " No...they use bullets and bombs instead, they have just evolved. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. Same tired response from someone of the Jewish faith...... " l'm non religious and The New Covenant is Christian. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt...but surely no religion stones people to death in this day and age..do they...? No...they use bullets and bombs instead, they have just evolved." Who's they? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. Same tired response from someone of the Jewish faith...... l'm non religious and The New Covenant is Christian." Your various previous posts regarding your religion prove otherwise..... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt...but surely no religion stones people to death in this day and age..do they...? No...they use bullets and bombs instead, they have just evolved." ...oops.. My mistake.. They do still stone people to death. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. Same tired response from someone of the Jewish faith...... l'm non religious and The New Covenant is Christian. Your various previous posts regarding your religion prove otherwise....." You do know you that ethnicity and religion aren't the same thing don't you? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!!" If it's Quebec you're on about, that was a shooting. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! If it's Quebec you're on about, that was a shooting." l know. l was being glib. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. Same tired response from someone of the Jewish faith...... " Same nauseating response from one of Fabs resident grovelling islamophiles. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. Same tired response from someone of the Jewish faith...... l'm non religious and The New Covenant is Christian. Your various previous posts regarding your religion prove otherwise..... You do know you that ethnicity and religion aren't the same thing don't you?" You do realise what a hypocrite you appear to be on here don't you? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. Same tired response from someone of the Jewish faith...... Same nauseating response from one of Fabs resident grovelling islamophiles." Yet another nauseating response from one of the most bigoted members of Fab..... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. Same tired response from someone of the Jewish faith...... l'm non religious and The New Covenant is Christian. Your various previous posts regarding your religion prove otherwise..... You do know you that ethnicity and religion aren't the same thing don't you? You do realise what a hypocrite you appear to be on here don't you?" No. Do explain. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! If it's Quebec you're on about, that was a shooting. l know. l was being glib." Ok cool. I think it's relevant though, as I don't think mass shootings on the North American peninsula are restricted to Muslims. Or maybe the Christian ones just shoot school children. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt...but surely no religion stones people to death in this day and age..do they...? " They do its called Islam. Isis have stoned women to death, beheaded non believers and infidels and thrown LBGT people off rooftops, drowned people in sealed cages underwater, and also burnt someone alive in a sealed cage, all in the name of Islam in the modern world we live in today. For those who say Isis are not a true representation of Islam then look at what goes on as a rule of law in the hard line Islamic country of Saudi Arabia.....Public state sponsored beheadings for various crimes, people have their hands chopped off for stealing, and women treated like 2nd class citizens, women not even allowed to drive a car. And people signing this ridiculous petition to ban Trump think Donald Trump is bad? It's laughable! Trump is a pussy cat compared to Saudi Arabia's leaders. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. Same tired response from someone of the Jewish faith...... Same nauseating response from one of Fabs resident grovelling islamophiles. Yet another nauseating response from one of the most bigoted members of Fab....." And what's your favourite Islamic atrocity of the week...I know, so many to choose from but have a go anyway? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt...but surely no religion stones people to death in this day and age..do they...? They do its called Islam. Isis have stoned women to death, beheaded non believers and infidels and thrown LBGT people off rooftops, drowned people in sealed cages underwater, and also burnt someone alive in a sealed cage, all in the name of Islam in the modern world we live in today. For those who say Isis are not a true representation of Islam then look at what goes on as a rule of law in the hard line Islamic country of Saudi Arabia.....Public state sponsored beheadings for various crimes, people have their hands chopped off for stealing, and women treated like 2nd class citizens, women not even allowed to drive a car. And people signing this ridiculous petition to ban Trump think Donald Trump is bad? It's laughable! Trump is a pussy cat compared to Saudi Arabia's leaders. " Is that why Trump hasn't included them in his list of nasty muslims? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. Same tired response from someone of the Jewish faith...... l'm non religious and The New Covenant is Christian. Your various previous posts regarding your religion prove otherwise..... You do know you that ethnicity and religion aren't the same thing don't you? You do realise what a hypocrite you appear to be on here don't you?" The poster doesn't appear to be a hypocrite at all. Speak for yourself as you're obviously not qualified to speak for others. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt...but surely no religion stones people to death in this day and age..do they...? They do its called Islam. Isis have stoned women to death, beheaded non believers and infidels and thrown LBGT people off rooftops, drowned people in sealed cages underwater, and also burnt someone alive in a sealed cage, all in the name of Islam in the modern world we live in today. For those who say Isis are not a true representation of Islam then look at what goes on as a rule of law in the hard line Islamic country of Saudi Arabia.....Public state sponsored beheadings for various crimes, people have their hands chopped off for stealing, and women treated like 2nd class citizens, women not even allowed to drive a car. And people signing this ridiculous petition to ban Trump think Donald Trump is bad? It's laughable! Trump is a pussy cat compared to Saudi Arabia's leaders. Is that why Trump hasn't included them in his list of nasty muslims? " We all know. lt's the oil. lt's a disgrace. The Saudi's punishment of choice for treason is Crucifixion. Yes literally. This is why the UN is now a joke. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump confuses me. He's a politician who, as they all do, promised things. But he actually appears to be attempting to deliver on his promises. WTF?! "Trump is not a politician. The reason he won the Presidency is precisely because he is not a politician. People are sick and tired of career politicians who always break their promises. Trump is a businessman who gets things done, and it looks like he keeps his promises too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! If it's Quebec you're on about, that was a shooting. l know. l was being glib. Ok cool. I think it's relevant though, as I don't think mass shootings on the North American peninsula are restricted to Muslims. Or maybe the Christian ones just shoot school children. " lf you can show me that those shootings were scripturally inspired from the New Testament and from the Nazarene, then l will happily agree with you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. Same tired response from someone of the Jewish faith...... l'm non religious and The New Covenant is Christian. Your various previous posts regarding your religion prove otherwise..... You do know you that ethnicity and religion aren't the same thing don't you? You do realise what a hypocrite you appear to be on here don't you? The poster doesn't appear to be a hypocrite at all. Speak for yourself as you're obviously not qualified to speak for others. " Thank you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Muslims blowing things up??? NEVER!! l mean, the Qu'ran does tell them to subjugate the unbeliever and to slay them wherever they hide, but lslam is peacful!!! And the bible has half a dozen verses advocating stoning people to death.... your point being? -Matt Which book? Pre New-Coventant? Mosaic Law or Getile law? The level of violence in the OT is nothing on the Qu'ran. Same tired Western response. Same tired response from someone of the Jewish faith...... l'm non religious and The New Covenant is Christian. Your various previous posts regarding your religion prove otherwise..... You do know you that ethnicity and religion aren't the same thing don't you? You do realise what a hypocrite you appear to be on here don't you? The poster doesn't appear to be a hypocrite at all. Speak for yourself as you're obviously not qualified to speak for others. " I am speaking for myself,....where exactly have I claimed to speak for anyone else? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump was elected for all the things he's now acting upon, so why the feigned surprise? Perhaps cos he isn't a politician and therefore bypasses the diplomacy and machinations of politics that he gets right down to doing what he was elected for, and thats whats rubbing the establishments back up." .. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump was elected for all the things he's now acting upon, so why the feigned surprise? Perhaps cos he isn't a politician and therefore bypasses the diplomacy and machinations of politics that he gets right down to doing what he was elected for, and thats whats rubbing the establishments back up." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump confuses me. He's a politician who, as they all do, promised things. But he actually appears to be attempting to deliver on his promises. WTF?!
Trump is not a politician. The reason he won the Presidency is precisely because he is not a politician. People are sick and tired of career politicians who always break their promises. Trump is a businessman who gets things done, and it looks like he keeps his promises too. "But is Trump corrupted? There have been business men presidents in the past in other countries. I know one is facing trials for fraud at The Hague. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage" typical of news channels in UK | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Let's face it, he's a wealthy, white male - those 3 reasons alone are sufficient for the stupids to hate him. If he was a black, disabled lesbian we'd all be slipping in lefty pre-cum on the streets of Britain "Male lesbian? Is that possible? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump was elected for all the things he's now acting upon, so why the feigned surprise? Perhaps cos he isn't a politician and therefore bypasses the diplomacy and machinations of politics that he gets right down to doing what he was elected for, and thats whats rubbing the establishments back up." Or maybe, just maybe, in his rush deliver a set of promises he's ignoring the legal and constitutional issues....which is fantastic of course. Who needs that sort of outdated nonsense eh? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Let's face it, he's a wealthy, white male - those 3 reasons alone are sufficient for the stupids to hate him. If he was a black, disabled lesbian we'd all be slipping in lefty pre-cum on the streets of Britain "LOL! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage" Trump then added the 3 month ban (90 days) on entry until correct paperwork was put in place, what is wrong with that? the main problem is "Visa Waiver" travel, it is up to every single one of us traveling to a country to ensure our entry paperwork is in order. Entry to any country is a privilege which people think is now an expected right, . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The pollsters that attribute him with the worst 'approval ratings' make me laugh. Are these the pollsters that stated he wouldn't be the Republican Nominee? That he wouldn't then be President? This travel ban stuff is all hysteria anyway and nothing to do with the UK. How the USA sees fit to control its borders is the business of the USA. This people calling it the 'Muslim ban' and the social justice 'award wining' journalists should try reading the executive order first." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The pollsters that attribute him with the worst 'approval ratings' make me laugh. Are these the pollsters that stated he wouldn't be the Republican Nominee? That he wouldn't then be President? This travel ban stuff is all hysteria anyway and nothing to do with the UK. How the USA sees fit to control its borders is the business of the USA. This people calling it the 'Muslim ban' and the social justice 'award wining' journalists should try reading the executive order first. "another thumbs up here | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The pollsters that attribute him with the worst 'approval ratings' make me laugh. Are these the pollsters that stated he wouldn't be the Republican Nominee? That he wouldn't then be President? This travel ban stuff is all hysteria anyway and nothing to do with the UK. How the USA sees fit to control its borders is the business of the USA. This people calling it the 'Muslim ban' and the social justice 'award wining' journalists should try reading the executive order first." .... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump isn't the problem.. It's his supporters and people who say things like "Muslim on Muslim" that are lol.. " pretty sure Muslim on Muslim violence is a thing though lol.don't get me wrong most Muslim family's in the UK are good people and I admire there strong family unit they have but go to the middile east and there has been Muslim on Muslim violence for hundreds of years all over clear bullshit written in a book.dosent help there countries are rich in natural resources hence why the west love to rile the country's up and cause more death by arming a side they randomly pick to keep the war and money flowing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is publicity. A chaotic execution of the order to maximise disruption and protest. He appears to be "delivering" on his promise but even a cursory comparison between the list of countries under the suspension and those where terrorists have travelled to the USA makes it clear that it has nothing to do with making the country safer. Just showboating. Do any of those supporting him disagree? It's the same strategy that brought him to power. Outrage and publicity. No surprise. No use either." People who have the right to say; http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38804462 . The UK has no voice | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who have the right to say; http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38804462 . The UK has no voice" So why are you posting?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who have the right to say; http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38804462 . The UK has no voice So why are you posting? "posted the _iews of the American People, didn't you watch the link | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage" strange how this poll is kept well hidden online "Donald Trump should make a State Visit to the United Kingdom" . lawmakers will also debate a second petition calling for the state visit to go ahead, , you really need to search hard to find the above petition | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the gunmen who has been arrested was a Moroccan. Do you really believe that he was not a Muslim? From Morocco?" He was probably a very nice boy who was full of life and loved by all in his community Bit like the drug dealer with the gun who got shot by the police in London | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Let's face it, he's a wealthy, white male - those 3 reasons alone are sufficient for the stupids to hate him. If he was a black, disabled lesbian we'd all be slipping in lefty pre-cum on the streets of Britain " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK "No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit. "He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?"My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign. "You just now criticised the process | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process "If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator. "And that is definately a good thing; the Right Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing! "Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you! "
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?"Do-nuffing-bama? Is this a charming new variation on dindu nuffin? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
Do-nuffing-bama? Is this a charming new variation on dindu nuffin? "Whats yours? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
Do-nuffing-bama? Is this a charming new variation on dindu nuffin?
Whats yours?"I don't have one. Because I'm not a massive racist. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you!
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to"I'm educated at masters level, read very, very widely, try to have conversations which don't use regurgitated, unoriginal and well-versed ad-hominem attacks like 'looney lefty', and try to keep my mind open to all points of _iew, so I'm doing just fine. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
Do-nuffing-bama? Is this a charming new variation on dindu nuffin?
Whats yours?
I don't have one. Because I'm not a massive racist."Neither am I; so f**king suggest that I am | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you!
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to
I'm educated at masters level, read very, very widely, try to have conversations which don't use regurgitated, unoriginal and well-versed ad-hominem attacks like 'looney lefty', and try to keep my mind open to all points of _iew, so I'm doing just fine. "If you say so | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you!
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to
I'm educated at masters level, read very, very widely, try to have conversations which don't use regurgitated, unoriginal and well-versed ad-hominem attacks like 'looney lefty', and try to keep my mind open to all points of _iew, so I'm doing just fine. "And that isn't an 'alternate fact' it's plain truth. Haha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
Do-nuffing-bama? Is this a charming new variation on dindu nuffin?
Whats yours?
I don't have one. Because I'm not a massive racist.
Neither am I; so f**king suggest that I am "So what exactly is "do-nuffin-Bama" supposed to mean then? I assume if you wanted to (perhaps legitimately) criticise his lack of policy success during his presidency you'd have said "do-nothing" instead. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you!
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to
I'm educated at masters level, read very, very widely, try to have conversations which don't use regurgitated, unoriginal and well-versed ad-hominem attacks like 'looney lefty', and try to keep my mind open to all points of _iew, so I'm doing just fine.
And that isn't an 'alternate fact' it's plain truth. Haha "Glad to see some endorsing your _iews; even if it is yourself doing it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you!
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to
I'm educated at masters level, read very, very widely, try to have conversations which don't use regurgitated, unoriginal and well-versed ad-hominem attacks like 'looney lefty', and try to keep my mind open to all points of _iew, so I'm doing just fine. "well done, you just need to get a job now, pay off your student dept and find your way in the world wishing you well | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
Do-nuffing-bama? Is this a charming new variation on dindu nuffin?
Whats yours?
I don't have one. Because I'm not a massive racist.
Neither am I; so f**king suggest that I am
So what exactly is "do-nuffin-Bama" supposed to mean then? I assume if you wanted to (perhaps legitimately) criticise his lack of policy success during his presidency you'd have said "do-nothing" instead."I could have; but I didn't; you chose to draw a parallel which I had not suggested, indeed, didn't even know about until I googled it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you!
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to
I'm educated at masters level, read very, very widely, try to have conversations which don't use regurgitated, unoriginal and well-versed ad-hominem attacks like 'looney lefty', and try to keep my mind open to all points of _iew, so I'm doing just fine.
And that isn't an 'alternate fact' it's plain truth. Haha
Glad to see some endorsing your _iews; even if it is yourself doing it "That is completely fine, I don't need affirmation from anybody. Like I say I'm open to different _iews when people have something to say that is worth listening to and they say it with respect. I look forward to the day when the cycle of being a decent human being is cool again. Until then I am more than happy to alone in a very bitter crowd. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
Do-nuffing-bama? Is this a charming new variation on dindu nuffin?
Whats yours?
I don't have one. Because I'm not a massive racist.
Neither am I; so f**king suggest that I am
So what exactly is "do-nuffin-Bama" supposed to mean then? I assume if you wanted to (perhaps legitimately) criticise his lack of policy success during his presidency you'd have said "do-nothing" instead.
I could have; but I didn't; you chose to draw a parallel which I had not suggested, indeed, didn't even know about until I googled it"Well now you've googled it, I assume you see why I reached the logical conclusion I did. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
Do-nuffing-bama? Is this a charming new variation on dindu nuffin?
Whats yours?
I don't have one. Because I'm not a massive racist.
Neither am I; so f**king suggest that I am
So what exactly is "do-nuffin-Bama" supposed to mean then? I assume if you wanted to (perhaps legitimately) criticise his lack of policy success during his presidency you'd have said "do-nothing" instead.
I could have; but I didn't; you chose to draw a parallel which I had not suggested, indeed, didn't even know about until I googled it
Well now you've googled it, I assume you see why I reached the logical conclusion I did. "I can now see why you reached that conclusion Can you see that not everyone knows every racist term or connotation that there is on the bl**dy planet? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you!
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to
I'm educated at masters level, read very, very widely, try to have conversations which don't use regurgitated, unoriginal and well-versed ad-hominem attacks like 'looney lefty', and try to keep my mind open to all points of _iew, so I'm doing just fine.
well done, you just need to get a job now, pay off your student dept and find your way in the world
wishing you well "Thank you Steve. The masters is fully paid off, and already working | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you!
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to
I'm educated at masters level, read very, very widely, try to have conversations which don't use regurgitated, unoriginal and well-versed ad-hominem attacks like 'looney lefty', and try to keep my mind open to all points of _iew, so I'm doing just fine.
And that isn't an 'alternate fact' it's plain truth. Haha
Glad to see some endorsing your _iews; even if it is yourself doing it
That is completely fine, I don't need affirmation from anybody. Like I say I'm open to different _iews when people have something to say that is worth listening to and they say it with respect. I look forward to the day when the cycle of being a decent human being is cool again. Until then I am more than happy to alone in a very bitter crowd. "Ofcourse you don't need any affirmation from anyone; everyone already knows that your _iew or opinion is the only correct one because you got your MA in flower-arranging from the Open University | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
Do-nuffing-bama? Is this a charming new variation on dindu nuffin?
Whats yours?
I don't have one. Because I'm not a massive racist.
Neither am I; so f**king suggest that I am
So what exactly is "do-nuffin-Bama" supposed to mean then? I assume if you wanted to (perhaps legitimately) criticise his lack of policy success during his presidency you'd have said "do-nothing" instead.
I could have; but I didn't; you chose to draw a parallel which I had not suggested, indeed, didn't even know about until I googled it
Well now you've googled it, I assume you see why I reached the logical conclusion I did.
I can now see why you reached that conclusion
Can you see that not everyone knows every racist term or connotation that there is on the bl**dy planet?"Yes, I can, but I thought that one was pretty well known to people who use the internet. It just seemed a bizarre thing to come up with independently, but I see it's just a coincidence. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you!
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to
I'm educated at masters level, read very, very widely, try to have conversations which don't use regurgitated, unoriginal and well-versed ad-hominem attacks like 'looney lefty', and try to keep my mind open to all points of _iew, so I'm doing just fine.
And that isn't an 'alternate fact' it's plain truth. Haha
Glad to see some endorsing your _iews; even if it is yourself doing it
That is completely fine, I don't need affirmation from anybody. Like I say I'm open to different _iews when people have something to say that is worth listening to and they say it with respect. I look forward to the day when the cycle of being a decent human being is cool again. Until then I am more than happy to alone in a very bitter crowd.
Ofcourse you don't need any affirmation from anyone; everyone already knows that your _iew or opinion is the only correct one because you got your MA in flower-arranging from the Open University "Nope, still waiting to hear back about that one. My MA is in being a smart arse. Came out with excellent results  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you!
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to
I'm educated at masters level, read very, very widely, try to have conversations which don't use regurgitated, unoriginal and well-versed ad-hominem attacks like 'looney lefty', and try to keep my mind open to all points of _iew, so I'm doing just fine.
well done, you just need to get a job now, pay off your student dept and find your way in the world
wishing you well
Thank you Steve. The masters is fully paid off, and already working "You are most welcome, and hopefully in a position which makes use of your degree, so many students today gain a degree and end up doing an unsuited job what work are you in, if you don't mind me asking? age of 30's is a good time in life | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you!
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to
I'm educated at masters level, read very, very widely, try to have conversations which don't use regurgitated, unoriginal and well-versed ad-hominem attacks like 'looney lefty', and try to keep my mind open to all points of _iew, so I'm doing just fine.
well done, you just need to get a job now, pay off your student dept and find your way in the world
wishing you well
Thank you Steve. The masters is fully paid off, and already working
You are most welcome, and hopefully in a position which makes use of your degree, so many students today gain a degree and end up doing an unsuited job
what work are you in, if you don't mind me asking?
age of 30's is a good time in life"I'd rather not say but it's an academic job and I love it, but I feel older than 30 for it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage He is backed by the Majority in USA and in UK
No he isn't. Three million more people voted for HRC- not that she isn't a shower of shit either, and the petition to stop the state visit over here has a significantly larger base than the one supporting his visit.
He won by the same rules as do-nuffing-bama did. Wasn't a problem then; why has it become one now?
My response was to the statement that he has majority support which he clearly doesn't. Where did I criticise the process? There has never been a larger margin than the one between trump and HRC, so there is definitely something not working. Anyway, they're two cheeks of the same arse! On his Inauguration Day, he was up her and old Bill's arses, telling his audience to applaud them, saying he 'respected and admired them'. Far different from what he said during his campaign.
You just now criticised the process
If the margin gets bigger and bigger with each election and the popular vote doesn't count then I think it's something worth looking at. But again, I reiterate that both candidates are two cheeks of the same arse. Donny T and the Clintons have been pals for years. Even the Democratic Party is pretty far to the right by our party's standards so it doesn't make much of a difference. I do think he's a cock though. He crumbles around other leaders- he looked weak as fuck on his first meeting with Obama and he's an absolutely terrible public orator.
And that is definately a good thing; the Right
Look what the hand-wringing looney lefties have done; yes; exactly that; nothing!
Oh deary me, the hyperbole. The Sun newspaper has definitely done a number on you!
I don't read newspapers; but it does seem that you do And look at where reading all that rubbish has got you to
I'm educated at masters level, read very, very widely, try to have conversations which don't use regurgitated, unoriginal and well-versed ad-hominem attacks like 'looney lefty', and try to keep my mind open to all points of _iew, so I'm doing just fine.
And that isn't an 'alternate fact' it's plain truth. Haha
Glad to see some endorsing your _iews; even if it is yourself doing it
That is completely fine, I don't need affirmation from anybody. Like I say I'm open to different _iews when people have something to say that is worth listening to and they say it with respect. I look forward to the day when the cycle of being a decent human being is cool again. Until then I am more than happy to alone in a very bitter crowd.
Ofcourse you don't need any affirmation from anyone; everyone already knows that your _iew or opinion is the only correct one because you got your MA in flower-arranging from the Open University
Nope, still waiting to hear back about that one. My MA is in being a smart arse. Came out with excellent results "Smart is good; even if it your a*se  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the gunmen who has been arrested was a Moroccan. Do you really believe that he was not a Muslim? From Morocco?" The gunman was not from Morocco. This is a fact. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of the gunmen who has been arrested was a Moroccan. Do you really believe that he was not a Muslim? From Morocco? The gunman was not from Morocco. This is a fact." We know. But this is what happens when you jump to conclusions without waiting for the facts. It's just the usual shower of fucktards and bitter little fascists on the politics board showing us once again what idiots they are. It'd be funny if it wasn't sad. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage" Seems his balls has got a SEAL killed... The US military analysis makes for sobering reading, and I notice donny the nonce isn't claiming ownership of this clusterfuck. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/30/quebec-mosque-shooting-two-students-arrested-gun-attack-mosque/amp/
That was a beautiful display of prejudice and racism in this thread. Quite difficult to claim anything else this time. Have a good, hard think | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not sure I should read this or not before I post but I do wonder how the born into money,married immagrants twice, bankrupted six times supossedly rascist fuckwit ever got this far . the rest of us must be some wankers.... I also can not spell" ...The man is a smart enough to fool so many fuck wits it is a terrible slur on ours and the American education systems that so many are fooled by this hokum .....It will end in tears for the workers and poor, Funnily the rich and vested interests will prosper | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not sure I should read this or not before I post but I do wonder how the born into money,married immagrants twice, bankrupted six times supossedly rascist fuckwit ever got this far . the rest of us must be some wankers.... I also can not spell...The man is a smart enough to fool so many fuck wits it is a terrible slur on ours and the American education systems that so many are fooled by this hokum .....It will end in tears for the workers and poor, Funnily the rich and vested interests will prosper" So the people you feel sorry for and who voted him in you class as fuckwits | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not sure I should read this or not before I post but I do wonder how the born into money,married immagrants twice, bankrupted six times supossedly rascist fuckwit ever got this far . the rest of us must be some wankers.... I also can not spell...The man is a smart enough to fool so many fuck wits it is a terrible slur on ours and the American education systems that so many are fooled by this hokum .....It will end in tears for the workers and poor, Funnily the rich and vested interests will prosper So the people you feel sorry for and who voted him in you class as fuckwits" I wouldn't agree with that assessment either. However, people now choose to believe what suits them, true or not and can tune their news to reinforce their opinions. This is being exploited more and more. Did you have a look at Factcheck.org? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage Seems his balls has got a SEAL killed... The US military analysis makes for sobering reading, and I notice donny the nonce isn't claiming ownership of this clusterfuck." Well, he wasn't in the situation room was he, which I think is unusual for a president in the circumstances. Then again he'd no doubt start barking orders thinking he knows best. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not sure I should read this or not before I post but I do wonder how the born into money,married immagrants twice, bankrupted six times supossedly rascist fuckwit ever got this far . the rest of us must be some wankers.... I also can not spell...The man is a smart enough to fool so many fuck wits it is a terrible slur on ours and the American education systems that so many are fooled by this hokum .....It will end in tears for the workers and poor, Funnily the rich and vested interests will prosper So the people you feel sorry for and who voted him in you class as fuckwits I wouldn't agree with that assessment either. However, people now choose to believe what suits them, true or not and can tune their news to reinforce their opinions. This is being exploited more and more. Did you have a look at Factcheck.org?" Although it will be the poor who suffer and the rich who prosper. That said, there will be a short term economic boost with tax cuts and infrastructure spending (which the Republicans pre rented Obama from doing). However there will be a huge debt to be paid. Trump doesn't pay his debts. The US will have to. That said, the Chinese have been dumping huge amounts of U.S. debt. I don't think the Donald's current rhetoric will encourage them to help fund him... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not sure I should read this or not before I post but I do wonder how the born into money,married immagrants twice, bankrupted six times supossedly rascist fuckwit ever got this far . the rest of us must be some wankers.... I also can not spell" I thought I would never get involved in politics on Fabswingers, but then I read this post. Why didn't any of my Northern friends tell me Willy Mcfuckbucket exists!? I clicked on posters profile and literally got out of bed to go downstairs and get phone charger so I can continue reading. Yes the profile is that good! Then I checked posters previous posts and Willy Mcfuckbucket really is a psychopath/sociopath. This is insane, but I would love to reply to post and share my opinion on Trump's rise to power... Just not right now because it is 4:20am and I can't keep my eyes open any longer. When I come in here next time and if the thread has not closed I will continue this post. Oh don't tell Willy Mcfuckbucket I was in here! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not sure I should read this or not before I post but I do wonder how the born into money,married immagrants twice, bankrupted six times supossedly rascist fuckwit ever got this far . the rest of us must be some wankers.... I also can not spell I thought I would never get involved in politics on Fabswingers, but then I read this post. Why didn't any of my Northern friends tell me Willy Mcfuckbucket exists!? I clicked on posters profile and literally got out of bed to go downstairs and get phone charger so I can continue reading. Yes the profile is that good! Then I checked posters previous posts and Willy Mcfuckbucket really is a psychopath/sociopath. This is insane, but I would love to reply to post and share my opinion on Trump's rise to power... Just not right now because it is 4:20am and I can't keep my eyes open any longer. When I come in here next time and if the thread has not closed I will continue this post. Oh don't tell Willy Mcfuckbucket I was in here!" Almost forgot about this! Here it goes... The following is a mixture of actual real facts and a few of my own opinions. Trump is a very succesful business man not by his own skills to start with because he had failed, but the banks bailed him out. His name had become more valuable to the banks so they had to bail him out otherwise they would have incurred huge losses. Donald realised he can't make money from buildings or any of his other projects, but he can sell his name 'Trump' thus the brand was created. He quickly learned Trump brand combined with TV exposure will make him more money... Over the years the more he failed the more skills he gained on how to beat the 'system' e.g avoiding tax. At the same time there is a financial war going on between wealthy groups and Trump wants to be at the top. So his plan began over a decade ago. Using TV exposure, making contacts and as a business man doing market research. He waited for the right moment to launch his bid for the white house. He used 'fear' tactics, he knew his statistics and targeted certain parts of the country as he knew those votes were up for grabs. As an outsider he was perfectly positioned to pick off his rivals one by one... he took advantage of the fact that the country was divided, hurting and people did not trust mainstream politicians. In other words he saw a gap in the market... Trump knew if he obtains the title 'president' he will get more exposure like never before his brand will grow worldwide. Trump likes his fans/supporters, but he loves the critics because he knows they keep him in the news... that is the reason he is constantly winding people up on social media. In other words he is a master in playing the numbers game... Trump is not racist, he is a business man looking to grow his empire. In his own words 'it's nothing personal, it's just business' He is having the time of his life and will do anything to grow the Trump brand. He has the entertainment and comedy factor. He is target driven and highly motivated to be the best president in the first 100 days... He needs to use shocking tactics such as 'the wall' 'banning countries' 'putting countries on notice' he knows which statement to say and when to get maximum effect including topics on China and Russia. It's not all bad news... pockets of resistence is growing. He can't sack everyone who speaks up against him. Right now Trump is winning and the world is loosing... Let's hope the American people have fastened their seatbelts because they are in for one hell of a rollercoaster and ultimately only they can stop him... As for me if you never hear from me again it's because Trump's organisation or his 'people' have taken me to place far far away... not because I am close to the truth, but because I may attempt to be cheeky and contact Melania Trump to ask her is Willy Mcfuckbucket as funny as people say he is... I know your thinking why would I take such a risk... in the wise words of Mr Trump himself: 'What do I have to loose...' After all he is President Donald Trump. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But don't forget all the Russians in the story too. There is a very convincing narrative that they funded much of his campaign. There are a number of deals that all seem a bit too good to be true. Selling mansions for twice their value to Russian mobsters, etc. Look up Adam Khan (@Khanoisseur) on Twitter for a lot of the things he has managed to uncover... when you put it all together it is quite convincing. -Matt" Pass. Putin is funding all of the nationalist parties in Europe though. No threat though. Lovely chap. Strong leader. Misunderstood. His sexuality certainly is I think | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump confuses me. He's a politician who, as they all do, promised things. But he actually appears to be attempting to deliver on his promises. WTF?!
Trump is not a politician. The reason he won the Presidency is precisely because he is not a politician. People are sick and tired of career politicians who always break their promises. Trump is a businessman who gets things done, and it looks like he keeps his promises too. "Is he keeping his promise to ban ALL Muslims from entry to the US until 'we know what the hells going on'. Because he says he's not. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump was elected for all the things he's now acting upon, so why the feigned surprise? Perhaps cos he isn't a politician and therefore bypasses the diplomacy and machinations of politics that he gets right down to doing what he was elected for, and thats whats rubbing the establishments back up." We're not surprised and we did expect it because it is what he said he'd do. But we're still going to oppose it because we believe it to be illegal, unconstitutional, unhelpful, wrong and more likely to increase the terrorist threat and put us all in more danger, not less. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The pollsters that attribute him with the worst 'approval ratings' make me laugh. Are these the pollsters that stated he wouldn't be the Republican Nominee? That he wouldn't then be President? This travel ban stuff is all hysteria anyway and nothing to do with the UK. How the USA sees fit to control its borders is the business of the USA. This people calling it the 'Muslim ban' and the social justice 'award wining' journalists should try reading the executive order first." Are you saying, contra to what he promised, that he's not going to try and have a complete shutdown of Muslims entering the US? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so glad to see he has balls....may upset a few but will get the job done ....well done Donald and fuck sky ,bbc ,,etc for all the negative coverage Trump then added the 3 month ban (90 days) on entry until correct paperwork was put in place, what is wrong with that? the main problem is "Visa Waiver" travel, it is up to every single one of us traveling to a country to ensure our entry paperwork is in order. Entry to any country is a privilege which people think is now an expected right, . " Their paperwork was in order and, for those with a visa or green card, it can take 18 months or more of vetting to get that paperwork. As far as I am aware there is no "visa waiver" for any of the seven countries on the list. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's perfectly possible to be right wing and still know that Trump is a shower of shite. " this | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But don't forget all the Russians in the story too. There is a very convincing narrative that they funded much of his campaign. There are a number of deals that all seem a bit too good to be true. Selling mansions for twice their value to Russian mobsters, etc. Look up Adam Khan (@Khanoisseur) on Twitter for a lot of the things he has managed to uncover... when you put it all together it is quite convincing. -Matt" For crying out loud Matt, please stop spreading fake news! I am meant to be in hiding after my previous post. There is a reason why Trump will cause chaos amongst anything and everything apart from Russia... It is soo obvious sometimes don't know if should laugh or cry. Deals are done at the highest levels we will never know about. Let's not get started on Trump's and Putin's bromance. What they do behind closed doors is non of our business. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
