FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Elections U Turn

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
11 weeks ago

Breaking news that Starmer has done a u turn on the local elections and they will now go ahead

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ineteen89Man
11 weeks ago

Swindon

Starmers campaign song should be U-turn by Usher

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otlovefun42Couple
11 weeks ago

Costa Blanca Spain...

This isn't a U turn. This a full blown World Rally Championship screaming handbrake turn.

Really, how incompetent can a government be?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
11 weeks ago

Excellent news 👏👏👏

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
11 weeks ago


"This isn't a U turn. This a full blown World Rally Championship screaming handbrake turn.

Really, how incompetent can a government be?"

It is extraordinary. Last week the Spectator ran a long article about No 10 based on insider sources - it was pretty dynamite stuff !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eroy1000Man
11 weeks ago

milton keynes


"Breaking news that Starmer has done a u turn on the local elections and they will now go ahead "

It appears that the government are to pay Reform for their legal fees relating to the legal case they submitted. Going to be some busy people now getting this organised as they thought they were going to get away with not bothering with elections

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ingdomNightTimePleasuresMan
11 weeks ago

nearby

Another few buckets in labours sinking ship

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
11 weeks ago

Amazing how Britain's former top lawyer knows so little about the law.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exyornotMan
11 weeks ago

halifax

Socialists don't really like democracy especially if they think it's going to be a desaster.........

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oubleswing2019Man
11 weeks ago

Colchester

I may despise Reform and everything they stand for, but as a legitimate party they should have the democratic opportunity as much as everyone else has, as is right and proper.

.

If it means they royally screw up, then that's on them. The point is, in a democracy we give others enough rope so that we may see them by their actions.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
11 weeks ago

Looking forward to all the lefties in here who’ve been defending Starmer cancelling elections to now defend him reinstating them. I could do with a good laugh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otlovefun42Couple
11 weeks ago

Costa Blanca Spain...


"Looking forward to all the lefties in here who’ve been defending Starmer cancelling elections to now defend him reinstating them. I could do with a good laugh "

Cue 30,000 face book posts about breakfast clubs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *an123Man
11 weeks ago

Faversham

I presume that record voting numbers will be recorded for local elections as all the people who demanded their right to vote turn out. Or will it be about the same numbers as always?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ingdomNightTimePleasuresMan
11 weeks ago

nearby

Nearly 8k comments on bbc hys, general consensus agrees with the decision.

Guardian not opened up comments, unsurprisingly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
11 weeks ago


"I presume that record voting numbers will be recorded for local elections as all the people who demanded their right to vote turn out. Or will it be about the same numbers as always?"

Those damn people demanding a right to vote!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *an123Man
11 weeks ago

Faversham


"I presume that record voting numbers will be recorded for local elections as all the people who demanded their right to vote turn out. Or will it be about the same numbers as always?

Those damn people demanding a right to vote! "

Indeed. So hopefully they will use it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
11 weeks ago


"I presume that record voting numbers will be recorded for local elections as all the people who demanded their right to vote turn out. Or will it be about the same numbers as always?

Those damn people demanding a right to vote!

Indeed. So hopefully they will use it."

Should people who don't vote lose that right ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
11 weeks ago


"I presume that record voting numbers will be recorded for local elections as all the people who demanded their right to vote turn out. Or will it be about the same numbers as always?"

I thought Starmer had said hardly anyone had objected, that everyone understood the reasons and were very supportive?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ie n MashCouple
11 weeks ago

Back in Malice


"

Should people who don't vote lose that right ?"

Great question. Much as I want to say YES, some people actively choose to not visit the ballot box if they wish to show their dissatisfaction with the choices on offer. Also, some might be disinterested at one election and engaged another. As such, I come down on the NO side on this one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *an123Man
11 weeks ago

Faversham


"I presume that record voting numbers will be recorded for local elections as all the people who demanded their right to vote turn out. Or will it be about the same numbers as always?

Those damn people demanding a right to vote!

Indeed. So hopefully they will use it.

Should people who don't vote lose that right ?"

I believe that voting should be compulsory. At the bottom of the ballot paper the option to tick a box marked none of the above should be available. There is no excuse not to vote with the availability of postal votes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acktopervMan
11 weeks ago

Stourport-On-Severn

Yesterday lunchtime Jeremy Vine was interviewing Starmer on his radio show. Vine pointed out to him that the government had done 13 policy u-turns since coming to power. He also asked Starmer the direct question "will there be any more government u-turns", to which Starmer replied "No". Less than 2 hours latter the government announces this election u-turn.

You really couldn't make this shit up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arry and MegsCouple
11 weeks ago

Ipswich

Starmer must be getting close to TACO trump with the number if u turns

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eroy1000Man
11 weeks ago

milton keynes


"Yesterday lunchtime Jeremy Vine was interviewing Starmer on his radio show. Vine pointed out to him that the government had done 13 policy u-turns since coming to power. He also asked Starmer the direct question "will there be any more government u-turns", to which Starmer replied "No". Less than 2 hours latter the government announces this election u-turn.

You really couldn't make this shit up."

So he U turned on his U turn comment.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wosmilersCouple
11 weeks ago

Heathrowish


"Yesterday lunchtime Jeremy Vine was interviewing Starmer on his radio show. Vine pointed out to him that the government had done 13 policy u-turns since coming to power. He also asked Starmer the direct question "will there be any more government u-turns", to which Starmer replied "No". Less than 2 hours latter the government announces this election u-turn.

You really couldn't make this shit up.

So he U turned on his U turn comment. "

It wasn't a U turn at all.

It was a strategic reappraisal of the prevailing conditions to flexibly react to ......

Bollocks, it was a U turn.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
11 weeks ago

Story now that Labour threatened Councils with funding cuts if they didn't ask for elections to be postponed. Another resignation on the cards...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oubleswing2019Man
11 weeks ago

Colchester

Reading some comments, ministers argued that due to local government changes in certain areas, holding expensive elections for councils that would not exist in a few years would be a waste of public money.

.

Now said councils are in a rush to print ballot papers and prepare polling stations.

.

Rush jobs tend to be more costly affairs than normal planned jobs.

.

Ultimately, the delay and then the reversal will be more costly in the long run.

.

Still, it's the right thing to do and let democracy and people have their say when they are supposed to have that chance. Kicking things in to the long grass is not a good look.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ingdomNightTimePleasuresMan
11 weeks ago

nearby


"Story now that Labour threatened Councils with funding cuts if they didn't ask for elections to be postponed. Another resignation on the cards..."

That’ll be funding cuts using tax payers money, that would have benefited communities.

Labour the enemy of workers and savers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *regoniansCouple
11 weeks ago

Oundle

Cue the next U turn: 2TK's choice for Cabinet Secretary is now in serious dog do. Turns out what Liebour said was 3 complaints from a single person were actually multiple complaints from multiple complainants. Rest assured, 2TK was never told about them. The bloke collects banana skins faster than Fyffes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
11 weeks ago


"Cue the next U turn: 2TK's choice for Cabinet Secretary is now in serious dog do. Turns out what Liebour said was 3 complaints from a single person were actually multiple complaints from multiple complainants. Rest assured, 2TK was never told about them. The bloke collects banana skins faster than Fyffes."

Haha 🍌🤣

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otMe66Man
11 weeks ago

Terra Firma

We should have known a u-turn was coming when he started to "imply" the UK would spend more on defence.

Playing the markets....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
11 weeks ago

On Talk Radio, a former Labour adviser Paul Richards has told the nation that it’s Nigel Farage’s fault that the money that could have been used to fix pot holes and on social care is now being spent on elections.

What are these people smoking?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
11 weeks ago


"On Talk Radio, a former Labour adviser Paul Richards has told the nation that it’s Nigel Farage’s fault that the money that could have been used to fix pot holes and on social care is now being spent on elections.

What are these people smoking?

"

Haha 🤭

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top