FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Trumps peace plan for gaza.

Jump to newest
 

By *hagTonight OP   Man
31 weeks ago

From the land of haribos.

Have you also followed the latest of it and what is happening with it, do you think it is a good plan?

Trumps plan have been accepted by netanyahu, whilst hamas is yet to issue an offical response, trumps propsal is 21 points, have you seen it? Here are some of them:

Gaza will be a deradicalised terror free zone.

Gaza willl be redeveloped.

If both sides agree to this proposal the war will immediately end.

Within 73hrs of israel publicly accepting this agreement, all hostages will be retrurned.

A special ecomonical zone will be established.

What is your view of it and why do you think hamas havent replied yet? Trump said that they have 3 to 4 days to do it.

I think that the palestinian authority is unlikely to agree to a lasting peace setlement with israel, it will be interesting to see what will happen after the 4 days too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rFilthMan
31 weeks ago

Rossendale

Do you think bringing the butcher of Baghdad in to help with pease talks is for peace?

Netanyahu will take Palestine and keep the troubles going in the Middle East as long as possible, it’s what they want he doesn’t care about the hostages!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otlovefun42Couple
31 weeks ago

Costa Blanca Spain...

It will fail.

The destruction of Israel is Hamas's sole reason to exist. If they agree to Trump's deal then it would be the end of Hamas.

Turkeys don't vote for Christmas.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otMe66Man
31 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"It will fail.

The destruction of Israel is Hamas's sole reason to exist. If they agree to Trump's deal then it would be the end of Hamas.

Turkeys don't vote for Christmas. "

That assumes Hamas abide by the rules. Why wouldn't they allow the rebuild to begin and profit from that, whilst rebuilding their own forces.

Even if a deal required Hamas to be dismantled, how would that be managed or measured? At best Gaza will end up with Hamas 2.0 under a different name.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
Forum Mod

31 weeks ago

Central

It's obviously done with Israel in power and without sufficient input from Palestine, which isn't the right foundation for peace.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otMe66Man
31 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"It's obviously done with Israel in power and without sufficient input from Palestine, which isn't the right foundation for peace. "

Who would be at the table from the Palestinian side?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ennineTopMan
31 weeks ago

York

So far the best coverage I've read on this is by The Times of Israel (a centrist media organisation in Israel terms).

They go into more detail than most other sources and seem to have a good feel for what's happening on the ground.

if you google times of israel on gaza peace plan you should come across several articles.

The one titled "Revealed: US 21-point plan for ending Gaza war, creating pathway to Palestinian state" explains the plan, others report on reactions, developments and obstacles.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otlovefun42Couple
31 weeks ago

Costa Blanca Spain...


"It will fail.

The destruction of Israel is Hamas's sole reason to exist. If they agree to Trump's deal then it would be the end of Hamas.

Turkeys don't vote for Christmas.

That assumes Hamas abide by the rules. Why wouldn't they allow the rebuild to begin and profit from that, whilst rebuilding their own forces.

Even if a deal required Hamas to be dismantled, how would that be managed or measured? At best Gaza will end up with Hamas 2.0 under a different name."

You mean Hamas speaking with forked tongue?

Who'd have thought?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ennineTopMan
31 weeks ago

York


"You mean Hamas speaking with forked tongue?

Who'd have thought?"

Point 17 of the plan is interesting...

"17. If Hamas delays or rejects this proposal, the above points will proceed in terror-free areas, which the IDF will gradually hand over to the international stabilization force.

This is the first mention of the possibility that the deal could be at least partially implemented, even if Hamas doesn’t agree."

Source: Times of Israel

This seems to have been neglected in most reports and provides a mechanism for some progress to be made even if Hamas rejects the plan outright or asks for modifications. So providing that Netanyahu really does agree with the plan there shouldn't be a cliff edge failure and a gradualistic approach could take place.

Also Trump has said that he won't allow Israel to annex the West Bank, so that takes some pressure off the situation if he means it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *its_and_TiramisuCouple
31 weeks ago

North Somerset

The Israeli government don't want peace. Especially Netanyahu.

Also from the Times Israel. 26/4/24

“We later found out that Hamas had offered on October 9 or 10 to release all the civilian hostages in exchange for the IDF not entering the Strip, but the government rejected the offer."

Did Benny Gantz and Gadi Eisenkot support your effort or were they not active on that front? (Five days after the war began, the centrist opposition National Unity party joined the emergency government, with its leader Gantz getting a spot on the three-member war cabinet and MK Eisenkot becoming an observer in the key decision-making panel. Both Gantz and Eisenkot are former IDF chiefs of staff.)

“We worked with them all the time. Any time we wanted to meet with them, they agreed. They pressured Netanyahu to make a deal, but Netanyahu sidelined them. The families are still asking Gantz not to leave the government” — as many government critics have increasingly been urging them to do.”

“The main reason is the prime minister’s refusal. On the one hand, Netanyahu has told the families that the price” — likely the release of countless Palestinian terror convicts — “isn’t a factor. On the other hand, he’s holding onto all sorts of security excuses to prevent a deal.”

How do you explain Netanyahu’s ostensible lack of effort to bring the hostages home?

“The main reason is conflict of interest. He knows that the moment the hostages are released, Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir will leave the government because they’ll think the price was too high.” (Finance Minister Smotrich, leader of the Religious Zionism party, and National Security Minister Ben Gvir, head of the Otzma Yehudit party, are far-right leaders essential to Netanyahu’s coalition and have been pushing for stronger military action in Gaza.)

“There is no doubt that Netanyahu is preventing a deal. Netanyahu knows that if he goes to elections at this time he won’t be able to form a new government, and he is motivated by cold political considerations.”

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ingdomNightTimePleasuresMan
31 weeks ago

nearby

Reading the latest on this it appears Trump

has been successful.

Israel have been told to stop bombing and Hamas agree to release the hostages

Who would have believed it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *its_and_TiramisuCouple
31 weeks ago

North Somerset


"Reading the latest on this it appears Trump

has been successful.

Israel have been told to stop bombing and Hamas agree to release the hostages

Who would have believed it "

From the BBC (similar reporting on other media channels).

"The Hamas statement did not specifically mention or accept Trump's 20-point plan but says it "renews its agreement to hand over the administration of the Gaza Strip to a Palestinian body of independents (technocrats), based on Palestinian national consensus and Arab and Islamic support.

However the statement makes no mention of one of the key demands of the plan – that Hamas agree to its disarmament and to playing no further role in the governance of Gaza.

The peace plan proposes an immediate end to fighting and the release within 72 hours of 20 living Israeli hostages held by Hamas - as well as the remains of hostages thought to be dead - in exchange for hundreds of detained Gazans.

There are believed to be 48 hostages still being held in the Palestinian territory by the armed group, only 20 of whom are thought to be alive.

The plan stipulates that once both sides agree to the proposal "full aid will be immediately sent into the Gaza Strip".

Under the US plan, Hamas would have no role in governing Gaza, and it leaves the door open for an eventual Palestinian state.

However, after Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu announced the plan together on Monday, Netanyahu reinstated his longstanding opposition to a Palestinian state, saying in a video statement shortly after the announcement: "It's not written in the agreement. We said we would strongly oppose a Palestinian state."

Hamas's statement on Friday said that the part of the proposals dealing with the future of Gaza and the rights of Palestinian people was still being discussed "within a national framework", of which it said Hamas will be a part."

Not sure Trump can claim the credit he is. And as Netanyahu is still 100% against a Palestinian state how successful any peace deal will be given he's not showing any signs of compromise. 🤔🤷‍♂️

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxq7zp7002o

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
31 weeks ago


"Reading the latest on this it appears Trump

has been successful.

Israel have been told to stop bombing and Hamas agree to release the hostages

Who would have believed it

From the BBC (similar reporting on other media channels).

"The Hamas statement did not specifically mention or accept Trump's 20-point plan but says it "renews its agreement to hand over the administration of the Gaza Strip to a Palestinian body of independents (technocrats), based on Palestinian national consensus and Arab and Islamic support.

However the statement makes no mention of one of the key demands of the plan – that Hamas agree to its disarmament and to playing no further role in the governance of Gaza.

The peace plan proposes an immediate end to fighting and the release within 72 hours of 20 living Israeli hostages held by Hamas - as well as the remains of hostages thought to be dead - in exchange for hundreds of detained Gazans.

There are believed to be 48 hostages still being held in the Palestinian territory by the armed group, only 20 of whom are thought to be alive.

The plan stipulates that once both sides agree to the proposal "full aid will be immediately sent into the Gaza Strip".

Under the US plan, Hamas would have no role in governing Gaza, and it leaves the door open for an eventual Palestinian state.

However, after Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu announced the plan together on Monday, Netanyahu reinstated his longstanding opposition to a Palestinian state, saying in a video statement shortly after the announcement: "It's not written in the agreement. We said we would strongly oppose a Palestinian state."

Hamas's statement on Friday said that the part of the proposals dealing with the future of Gaza and the rights of Palestinian people was still being discussed "within a national framework", of which it said Hamas will be a part."

Not sure Trump can claim the credit he is. And as Netanyahu is still 100% against a Palestinian state how successful any peace deal will be given he's not showing any signs of compromise. 🤔🤷‍♂️

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxq7zp7002o

"

There are some parts of that statement that admit war crimes, but that's no matter we will have peace and no responsibility.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ennineTopMan
31 weeks ago

York

This news looks very promising but there are multiple hurdles ahead.

Trump deserves praise for his efforts. Biden never put this kind of pressure on Netanyahu.

It looks like Netanyahu could survive this change in Israeli position even if Smotrich and Gvir pull the plug as I think parties on the left may step in to hold together a coalition.

It's going to be a bumpy road but at least there is more hope now than there's been for a long time that the situation will improve for all involved.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *its_and_TiramisuCouple
31 weeks ago

North Somerset


"This news looks very promising but there are multiple hurdles ahead.

Trump deserves praise for his efforts. Biden never put this kind of pressure on Netanyahu.

It looks like Netanyahu could survive this change in Israeli position even if Smotrich and Gvir pull the plug as I think parties on the left may step in to hold together a coalition.

It's going to be a bumpy road but at least there is more hope now than there's been for a long time that the situation will improve for all involved.

"

Netanyahu shouldn't survive. He should be arrested.

His aim of clinging to power has cost thousands of lives simply for his own benefit and to appease the likes of Smotrich and Gvir.

Without them the hostages would have been released in a matter of days.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ennineTopMan
31 weeks ago

York


"Netanyahu shouldn't survive. He should be arrested.

His aim of clinging to power has cost thousands of lives simply for his own benefit and to appease the likes of Smotrich and Gvir.

Without them the hostages would have been released in a matter of days."

We have to deal with the real world. Netanyahu has the power whether we like it or not. So if the left step in to bolster his position and this make peace possible then that's a good thing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *its_and_TiramisuCouple
31 weeks ago

North Somerset


"Netanyahu shouldn't survive. He should be arrested.

His aim of clinging to power has cost thousands of lives simply for his own benefit and to appease the likes of Smotrich and Gvir.

Without them the hostages would have been released in a matter of days.

We have to deal with the real world. Netanyahu has the power whether we like it or not. So if the left step in to bolster his position and this make peace possible then that's a good thing. "

It's not that long ago since someone else was in power and people chose to 'deal with him.

Remember the 1938 Munich Agreement?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ennineTopMan
31 weeks ago

York


"It's not that long ago since someone else was in power and people chose to 'deal with him.

Remember the 1938 Munich Agreement?"

If Smotrich and Gvir can be sidelined then that's potentially a big step forwards.

I'm not naive. I know there are huge problems ahead and that the behaviour of the Israeli government (and Hamas) should be condemned but I hope these latest developments bring an end to the bombing and deprivation of two million desperate people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *he National ThrustMan
30 weeks ago

Out standing in my field, Sussex

Would it be cynical to say that someone just wants a large seaside resort with a big gold letter 'T' on it.

The poor sods in Gaza could definitely do with some humanity, though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top