
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
| Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is uk doing wrong ?" Increasing taxes on business. Increasing the cost of doing business, too many petty rules from the past. The new employment rights bill is the final straw. Increasing public sector wages above inflation drove inflation up. Fanatical drive to “net zero”. Historical closures of nuclear power and the stupidity of the “dash for gas”. Combined with net zero this means our power is some of the most expensive in the world. Too much state spending. Building up debt which costs over £100bn a year in interest. Much of this spending is due to inefficiency in public services and the NHS. Way too much is due to the bloated and unsustainable welfare budget. I could go on, there would have been a much shorter answer if the question was “what is the uk doing right”. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is the UK doing wrong? What most are doing wrong, pandering to the rich, not taxing the rich, scared of the rich and allowing the rich to buy up our assets to rent them back to us. But its the migrants fault for coming here in small boats, but just a thought do you think that those migrants or some of them are fleeing from the grip on free speech, the fear of being locked up for a social media post, fleeing war etc, in there countries?" How does that help inflation? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have a look at food inflation. That is only going in one direction." 37% uk farms closed since 1973 (defra) Half our food imported laden with sugar and preservatives contributing to obesity Farmers receive 8% of all food sold in uk (Soil 2025) Farmers hit with 20% iht on break even business models Annual uk fruit and vegetables retail spend £2.25bn (confectionary £4.7bn) Junk food spend £56bn ( 20 times that of fruit and vegetables). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The near constant "WE ARE ALL DOOMED!" messaging is getting a bit tiresome. Certainly the UK economy is in poor shape but it's not the end of the world. People need a bit of perspective. UK CPI is now 3.8%. It was 11.1% in Oct 2022. It was 5.2% in Sept 2011. It was 5.2% in Sept 2008. It was 8.4% in Apr 1991. OK, so you supermarket bills keep going up. Tesco made £2.76 billion profit last year and for just the first six months of this accounting period £1.56 billion profit. You might be feeling poor but they aren't." Tesco is a poor example - arguably they have done the most to keep food inflation down (at the expense of producers), and their profit is modest, considering their size. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The near constant "WE ARE ALL DOOMED!" messaging is getting a bit tiresome. Certainly the UK economy is in poor shape but it's not the end of the world. People need a bit of perspective. UK CPI is now 3.8%. It was 11.1% in Oct 2022. It was 5.2% in Sept 2011. It was 5.2% in Sept 2008. It was 8.4% in Apr 1991. OK, so you supermarket bills keep going up. Tesco made £2.76 billion profit last year and for just the first six months of this accounting period £1.56 billion profit. You might be feeling poor but they aren't." Also... Cherry-picking high rates from the past few decades isn't really indicative of very much. One could arguably cherry pick the lowest four. That said, you're right that it's not all doom and gloom. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A Third of Food Inflation: The LSE's Centre for Economic Performance (CEP) found that Brexit accounts for about one-third of UK food price inflation since 2019. Billions in Extra Costs: The total cost of these trade barriers on food imports from the EU was estimated at £7 billion between December 2019 and March 2023. Impact on Prices: Studies show a noticeable relative increase in prices for goods more exposed to EU imports after Brexit, continuing into recent years. ….Yay, another Brexit win!" But, but passports.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The near constant "WE ARE ALL DOOMED!" messaging is getting a bit tiresome. Certainly the UK economy is in poor shape but it's not the end of the world. People need a bit of perspective. UK CPI is now 3.8%. It was 11.1% in Oct 2022. It was 5.2% in Sept 2011. It was 5.2% in Sept 2008. It was 8.4% in Apr 1991. OK, so you supermarket bills keep going up. Tesco made £2.76 billion profit last year and for just the first six months of this accounting period £1.56 billion profit. You might be feeling poor but they aren't." MPC summary (admittedly they are often wrong): “Core consumer goods price inflation had been 1.6% in August, with an increase in food price inflation to 5.1%. Intelligence from the Banks’ Agents pointed to higher global and domestic commodity prices as having accounted for much of the increase over the past year, with higher wholesale prices for beef, cocoa beans and coffee in particular. Labour costs and costs associated with new packaging regulation had also accounted for some of the increase in food prices”. No mention of Tesco profits. Tiresome! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also... Cherry-picking high rates from the past few decades isn't really indicative of very much. One could arguably cherry pick the lowest four." Yes, the defendent was found to be doing 73 mph for a brief period in a 30 mph zone but on average he was only doing 26 mph and at one point the vehicle came to a complete halt. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No mention of Tesco profits. Tiresome!" Like the MPC are going to mention Tesco. If the economy is tanking and business costs are rising then wouldn't we expect company profits to be decreasing rather than increasing? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also... Cherry-picking high rates from the past few decades isn't really indicative of very much. One could arguably cherry pick the lowest four. Yes, the defendent was found to be doing 73 mph for a brief period in a 30 mph zone but on average he was only doing 26 mph and at one point the vehicle came to a complete halt. " Exactly...? Those high years point to big issues at the time, so people should be concerned now? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Exactly...? Those high years point to big issues at the time, so people should be concerned now?" But not as concerned as people should have been in 2022, 2011, 2008 and 1991 because things were considerable worse then. My point is that when you step back a little, the current situation isn't particulaly unusual nor particularly bad and the contemporary near constant state of panic amongst some on the right is a bit naive or just plain disingenuous. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Increased tax on businesses. My local and popular cafe is closing because of this. I am sure there are other examples. Net Zero obsession contributes to huge amount of cost." The increase in employer NI contributions from 13.8% to 15% shouldn't be sufficient to close down your local cafe. Besides although the Secondary Threshold was reduced the Employment Allowance was increased in order to protect small businesses from this change so if the cafe has employer NI contribution liabilities of less that £100,000 a year I doubt that's why they are closing down. Also how much more do net zero plans contribute to the cafe's running costs? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Exactly...? Those high years point to big issues at the time, so people should be concerned now? But not as concerned as people should have been in 2022, 2011, 2008 and 1991 because things were considerable worse then. My point is that when you step back a little, the current situation isn't particulaly unusual nor particularly bad and the contemporary near constant state of panic amongst some on the right is a bit naive or just plain disingenuous. " Ah. So we should focus on the average speed, not the over-the-limit times. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah. So we should focus on the average speed, not the over-the-limit times." No. what I'm saying is pretty easy to understand. We should look at reality - the entire picture over a period of time including all the detailed ups and downs. 3.8% CPI is well above the 2% BofE target but it's not disastrous. Just like the 11.1% inflation we had three years ago, it won't sink the UK beneath the waves. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah. So we should focus on the average speed, not the over-the-limit times. No. what I'm saying is pretty easy to understand. We should look at reality - the entire picture over a period of time including all the detailed ups and downs. 3.8% CPI is well above the 2% BofE target but it's not disastrous. Just like the 11.1% inflation we had three years ago, it won't sink the UK beneath the waves. " Inflation in Venezuela is 172%. Britain has never had it so good! Crisis, what crisis? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah. So we should focus on the average speed, not the over-the-limit times. No. what I'm saying is pretty easy to understand. We should look at reality - the entire picture over a period of time including all the detailed ups and downs. 3.8% CPI is well above the 2% BofE target but it's not disastrous. Just like the 11.1% inflation we had three years ago, it won't sink the UK beneath the waves. " Agree with your sentiment and conclusion. Just pointing that your previous example argued with your own point. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Agree with your sentiment and conclusion. Just pointing that your previous example argued with your own point. " It's trivial but I'm intrigued, which example argued with which point? Was it just me pointing out that previously inflation was higher than it is now? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Agree with your sentiment and conclusion. Just pointing that your previous example argued with your own point. It's trivial but I'm intrigued, which example argued with which point? Was it just me pointing out that previously inflation was higher than it is now?" Yes, the defendent was found to be doing 73 mph for a brief period in a 30 mph zone but on average he was only doing 26 mph and at one point the vehicle came to a complete halt. The analogy, not example (sorry). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also how much more do net zero plans contribute to the cafe's running costs?" Quite a bit. About 20% of energy prices is down to Net Zero, and cafes use a lot of energy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes, the defendent was found to be doing 73 mph for a brief period in a 30 mph zone but on average he was only doing 26 mph and at one point the vehicle came to a complete halt. The analogy, not example (sorry)." But that doesn't conflict with my argument. You said " Cherry-picking high rates from the past few decades isn't really indicative of very much. One could arguably cherry pick the lowest four." In a argument against the proposition that CPI being 3.8% CPI is worryingly high, pointing out that CPI was 11.1% a few years ago isn't cherry-picking. Ignoring the fact that it was 11.1% to pretend that 3.8% is high would be cherry-picking by omission. Thus my joke about playing down the fact that the defendent was doing 73 mph in a 30 mph zone. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes, the defendent was found to be doing 73 mph for a brief period in a 30 mph zone but on average he was only doing 26 mph and at one point the vehicle came to a complete halt. The analogy, not example (sorry). But that doesn't conflict with my argument. You said " Cherry-picking high rates from the past few decades isn't really indicative of very much. One could arguably cherry pick the lowest four." In a argument against the proposition that CPI being 3.8% CPI is worryingly high, pointing out that CPI was 11.1% a few years ago isn't cherry-picking. Ignoring the fact that it was 11.1% to pretend that 3.8% is high would be cherry-picking by omission. Thus my joke about playing down the fact that the defendent was doing 73 mph in a 30 mph zone." It's a matter of perspective, probably. Still, your general observation is correct. 3.8% is unpleasant (in a recent history context), but not a reason to panic. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Quite a bit. About 20% of energy prices is down to Net Zero, and cafes use a lot of energy." So what percentage of the cafe's overall running costs would you estimate was down to the net zero initiative? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Quite a bit. About 20% of energy prices is down to Net Zero, and cafes use a lot of energy. So what percentage of the cafe's overall running costs would you estimate was down to the net zero initiative? " Easy. 3-5%. That's pure net zero, not energy in general. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The focus is on Nov 26th, not Nov 1990. This Treasury’s policies have been unpredictable..." Actually, somewhat predictable, unfortunately. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Easy. 3-5%. That's pure net zero, not energy in general." Let's go with 5% to emphasize the "huge" cost of net zero. And you said that the net zero component of energy bills was 20% so the energy bill would be five times higher than that, this would mean that you think that energy bills make up a quarter of the cafe's costs. Are you sure that's anywhere near a realistic estimate given the cost of the premises, staff, food and drink supplies, other utilities, business rates, capital investment in furniture and equipment etc? But just for the sake of argument let's imagine that net zero really was a 5% cost, would that close down an otherwise viable business? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Easy. 3-5%. That's pure net zero, not energy in general. Let's go with 5% to emphasize the "huge" cost of net zero. And you said that the net zero component of energy bills was 20% so the energy bill would be five times higher than that, this would mean that you think that energy bills make up a quarter of the cafe's costs. Are you sure that's anywhere near a realistic estimate given the cost of the premises, staff, food and drink supplies, other utilities, business rates, capital investment in furniture and equipment etc? But just for the sake of argument let's imagine that net zero really was a 5% cost, would that close down an otherwise viable business?" 2 things to note. 5% is the upper end of net profit for a SME. It is not 5% in isolation it compounds. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"2 things to note. 5% is the upper end of net profit for a SME. It is not 5% in isolation it compounds." I've run a couple of businesses where net profits were about twice the running costs. Any business that can't survive a 5% increase in costs is toast. Especially if it's a cafe selling toast. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"2 things to note. 5% is the upper end of net profit for a SME. It is not 5% in isolation it compounds. I've run a couple of businesses where net profits were about twice the running costs. Any business that can't survive a 5% increase in costs is toast. Especially if it's a cafe selling toast. " Nice | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not forgetting the 3.8% figure is fudged beyond belief. Check the so called basket of goods they use to calculate the figures and see how many do not apply. Pop to the supermarket or any shop and see how much more you are actually paying compared to last year." I understand your point but the basket of 752 different items gives us a reasonable measure. We all of course buy different things so each of us will have our own individual inflation profile. The methodology and the list of items and their weightings is published on the ONS website and I don't think it's subject to political manipulation. It's not perfect but it's difficult to imagine how one could design a measure that was perfect. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not forgetting the 3.8% figure is fudged beyond belief. Check the so called basket of goods they use to calculate the figures and see how many do not apply. Pop to the supermarket or any shop and see how much more you are actually paying compared to last year. I understand your point but the basket of 752 different items gives us a reasonable measure. We all of course buy different things so each of us will have our own individual inflation profile. The methodology and the list of items and their weightings is published on the ONS website and I don't think it's subject to political manipulation. It's not perfect but it's difficult to imagine how one could design a measure that was perfect. " One word. Hamsters. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not forgetting the 3.8% figure is fudged beyond belief. Check the so called basket of goods they use to calculate the figures and see how many do not apply. Pop to the supermarket or any shop and see how much more you are actually paying compared to last year." Rents have increased 6.7%(inc cpi data) Mortgage payments increased 28% in 2024 ( down from 61% in 2023) - this probably the single biggest expenditure and largest increase in costs affecting 10 million households. CPI inflation data apparently does not include mortgage costs. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One word. Hamsters." Section 09.3 Other Recreational Items, Gardens and Pets includes a subsection called Pets, Related Products and Services... Cat and dog food and dog treats, Pet collar, Small pet - eg hamster, Animal cage, Dog kennel boarding fees, Annual booster injection and Wild bird seed. If you think inflation is inaccurately skewed by sales of hamsters then there's nothing I'll be able to say to convince you otherwise. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"CPI inflation data apparently does not include mortgage costs." That's what CPIH is for, although CPIH doesn't look directly at mortgage interest costs but instead estimates how much a house owner would have to pay to rent a similar property. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |