Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So much for freedom of speech " Freedom of speech doesn’t apply in private venues or organisations, and it doesn’t mean freedom from consequences. You can’t say whatever you want and expect to avoid accountability. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So much for freedom of speech Freedom of speech doesn’t apply in private venues or organisations, and it doesn’t mean freedom from consequences. You can’t say whatever you want and expect to avoid accountability." Well said.  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"We are just astounded the way in which Glastonbury manages to wind so many people up year on year. It now become a full part of the offended calendar along with Christmas is being cancelled and Easter eggs don’t say Easter. Don’t people just relish being perpetually annoyed in life. If you genuinely think Glastonbury became shit and suddenly political you’re either not aging well or never really understood it. Kneecap went down a storm it’s a paid event and it’s what the punters wanted BBC or no BBC. " “Hitler went down a storm it’s what the punters wanted …..” etc etc. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So much for freedom of speech Freedom of speech doesn’t apply in private venues or organisations, and it doesn’t mean freedom from consequences. You can’t say whatever you want and expect to avoid accountability." Freedom of speech is protection from government interference as a consequence of speech. What the government are doing to Kneecap is the very definition of suppression of speech. Your definition of freedom of speech is incorrect and seems predicated on the US constitution interpretation that gets thrown around. It’s very clear that Kneecap are being hounded by the government, initially over their comments on drugs and the North of Ireland, now on their position on the hypocrisy of our government over Palestine. Kneecap come from a community that has dealt with government oppression for generations. Palestine and Ireland have been a common struggle against imperialism for a long time. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"We are just astounded the way in which Glastonbury manages to wind so many people up year on year. It now become a full part of the offended calendar along with Christmas is being cancelled and Easter eggs don’t say Easter. Don’t people just relish being perpetually annoyed in life. If you genuinely think Glastonbury became shit and suddenly political you’re either not aging well or never really understood it. Kneecap went down a storm it’s a paid event and it’s what the punters wanted BBC or no BBC. " The Glastonbury sheep doing their thing... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is clear to me that to make comment on the issue of Gaza is no longer allowed and to be ignored by all or else they will come get us. Even if the truth is looking us in the face, we are told the narrative that they want us to believe and we are not to sway from it. It seems anyone who makes a comment against the narrative will have their livelihood put at risk, threats of prison or prescribed a terrorist. Yeh free speech out of the window, dictator starmer is now in session. By the way Starmer has in the past defended plastine action, the jury found them not guilty due to their actions prevented a much larger crime (they had sabotaged a military fuel tanker bound to Iraq to fuel bombers in midair)." they locked people up last year for posting hurty words online,yet the usual suspects who support Palestine cheered it on thinking the same or worse wouldn't happen to them,people should be carefully for what they wish for | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite clearly, they aren't just nobodies any more and the government know they have a lot of sway, not just on social media but overseas too. Like someone said, they are being hounded because of their influence and they are incredibly well versed on the history. As far as I'm concerned, their set was class and the Eavis' family should be respected to not bowing to the pressure to remove them! If you're easily offended or can't stand to see evolving music genre's, Glastonbury isn't for you..." Glastonbury stopped being for me when they slung up a huge fence started charging extortionate prices and started putting pop acts on the bill | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is clear to me that to make comment on the issue of Gaza is no longer allowed and to be ignored by all or else they will come get us. Even if the truth is looking us in the face, we are told the narrative that they want us to believe and we are not to sway from it. It seems anyone who makes a comment against the narrative will have their livelihood put at risk, threats of prison or prescribed a terrorist. Yeh free speech out of the window, dictator starmer is now in session. By the way Starmer has in the past defended plastine action, the jury found them not guilty due to their actions prevented a much larger crime (they had sabotaged a military fuel tanker bound to Iraq to fuel bombers in midair).they locked people up last year for posting hurty words online,yet the usual suspects who support Palestine cheered it on thinking the same or worse wouldn't happen to them,people should be carefully for what they wish for" I do not think people should be locked up for saying hurry words, what are we coming to? If I am "allowed" to watch people starving and I do not believe the reasons given for starving a group of people, bombing them and killing them as they seemed a threat even though unarmed whist seeking aid. But I cannot comment on it to others. Imagine if we were not allowed to even have this conversation? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is clear to me that to make comment on the issue of Gaza is no longer allowed and to be ignored by all or else they will come get us. Even if the truth is looking us in the face, we are told the narrative that they want us to believe and we are not to sway from it. It seems anyone who makes a comment against the narrative will have their livelihood put at risk, threats of prison or prescribed a terrorist. Yeh free speech out of the window, dictator starmer is now in session. By the way Starmer has in the past defended plastine action, the jury found them not guilty due to their actions prevented a much larger crime (they had sabotaged a military fuel tanker bound to Iraq to fuel bombers in midair).they locked people up last year for posting hurty words online,yet the usual suspects who support Palestine cheered it on thinking the same or worse wouldn't happen to them,people should be carefully for what they wish for I do not think people should be locked up for saying hurry words, what are we coming to? If I am "allowed" to watch people starving and I do not believe the reasons given for starving a group of people, bombing them and killing them as they seemed a threat even though unarmed whist seeking aid. But I cannot comment on it to others. Imagine if we were not allowed to even have this conversation?" give it time I'm sure if they could see everything that's posted online a few on here would be getting a knock at the door,never trust goverment or the police they ain't your friends,I wouldn't piss on a politician or copper if they were on fire | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is clear to me that to make comment on the issue of Gaza is no longer allowed and to be ignored by all or else they will come get us. Even if the truth is looking us in the face, we are told the narrative that they want us to believe and we are not to sway from it. It seems anyone who makes a comment against the narrative will have their livelihood put at risk, threats of prison or prescribed a terrorist. Yeh free speech out of the window, dictator starmer is now in session. By the way Starmer has in the past defended plastine action, the jury found them not guilty due to their actions prevented a much larger crime (they had sabotaged a military fuel tanker bound to Iraq to fuel bombers in midair).they locked people up last year for posting hurty words online,yet the usual suspects who support Palestine cheered it on thinking the same or worse wouldn't happen to them,people should be carefully for what they wish for I do not think people should be locked up for saying hurry words, what are we coming to? If I am "allowed" to watch people starving and I do not believe the reasons given for starving a group of people, bombing them and killing them as they seemed a threat even though unarmed whist seeking aid. But I cannot comment on it to others. Imagine if we were not allowed to even have this conversation?give it time I'm sure if they could see everything that's posted online a few on here would be getting a knock at the door,never trust goverment or the police they ain't your friends,I wouldn't piss on a politician or copper if they were on fire" I really cannot disagree with you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is clear to me that to make comment on the issue of Gaza is no longer allowed and to be ignored by all or else they will come get us. Even if the truth is looking us in the face, we are told the narrative that they want us to believe and we are not to sway from it. It seems anyone who makes a comment against the narrative will have their livelihood put at risk, threats of prison or prescribed a terrorist. Yeh free speech out of the window, dictator starmer is now in session. By the way Starmer has in the past defended plastine action, the jury found them not guilty due to their actions prevented a much larger crime (they had sabotaged a military fuel tanker bound to Iraq to fuel bombers in midair).they locked people up last year for posting hurty words online,yet the usual suspects who support Palestine cheered it on thinking the same or worse wouldn't happen to them,people should be carefully for what they wish for I do not think people should be locked up for saying hurry words, what are we coming to? If I am "allowed" to watch people starving and I do not believe the reasons given for starving a group of people, bombing them and killing them as they seemed a threat even though unarmed whist seeking aid. But I cannot comment on it to others. Imagine if we were not allowed to even have this conversation?give it time I'm sure if they could see everything that's posted online a few on here would be getting a knock at the door,never trust goverment or the police they ain't your friends,I wouldn't piss on a politician or copper if they were on fire" This site has an algorithm to scan for certain words so just imagine how sophisticated the systems the government have in place are. I used to know a guy who worked in the legal department at EE. You wouldn’t believe some of the stuff he told me they were capable of | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is clear to me that to make comment on the issue of Gaza is no longer allowed and to be ignored by all or else they will come get us. Even if the truth is looking us in the face, we are told the narrative that they want us to believe and we are not to sway from it. It seems anyone who makes a comment against the narrative will have their livelihood put at risk, threats of prison or prescribed a terrorist. Yeh free speech out of the window, dictator starmer is now in session. By the way Starmer has in the past defended plastine action, the jury found them not guilty due to their actions prevented a much larger crime (they had sabotaged a military fuel tanker bound to Iraq to fuel bombers in midair).they locked people up last year for posting hurty words online,yet the usual suspects who support Palestine cheered it on thinking the same or worse wouldn't happen to them,people should be carefully for what they wish for I do not think people should be locked up for saying hurry words, what are we coming to? If I am "allowed" to watch people starving and I do not believe the reasons given for starving a group of people, bombing them and killing them as they seemed a threat even though unarmed whist seeking aid. But I cannot comment on it to others. Imagine if we were not allowed to even have this conversation?" Voicing support for a terrorist organization isn't having a conversation about it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is clear to me that to make comment on the issue of Gaza is no longer allowed and to be ignored by all or else they will come get us. Even if the truth is looking us in the face, we are told the narrative that they want us to believe and we are not to sway from it. It seems anyone who makes a comment against the narrative will have their livelihood put at risk, threats of prison or prescribed a terrorist. Yeh free speech out of the window, dictator starmer is now in session. By the way Starmer has in the past defended plastine action, the jury found them not guilty due to their actions prevented a much larger crime (they had sabotaged a military fuel tanker bound to Iraq to fuel bombers in midair).they locked people up last year for posting hurty words online,yet the usual suspects who support Palestine cheered it on thinking the same or worse wouldn't happen to them,people should be carefully for what they wish for I do not think people should be locked up for saying hurry words, what are we coming to? If I am "allowed" to watch people starving and I do not believe the reasons given for starving a group of people, bombing them and killing them as they seemed a threat even though unarmed whist seeking aid. But I cannot comment on it to others. Imagine if we were not allowed to even have this conversation? Voicing support for a terrorist organization isn't having a conversation about it" No it creates conversation like this thread, it spreads ideas and sparks the imagination, something the present government is clearly scared of. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"…it’s crazy how dangerous these words are compared to the heavy bombs being dropped on and subsequently burning babies to death in tents. Hard to say which is worse isn’t it tbh " Judging but the sentences handed out by the courts lately, hurty words are much more serious than causing actual physical harm to another person or persons. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"…it’s crazy how dangerous these words are compared to the heavy bombs being dropped on and subsequently burning babies to death in tents. Hard to say which is worse isn’t it tbh " 518 UK RAF sortees conducted on behalf of Israel identifying these targets Starmer wants kneecap off air for complaining about it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is clear to me that to make comment on the issue of Gaza is no longer allowed and to be ignored by all or else they will come get us. Even if the truth is looking us in the face, we are told the narrative that they want us to believe and we are not to sway from it. It seems anyone who makes a comment against the narrative will have their livelihood put at risk, threats of prison or prescribed a terrorist. Yeh free speech out of the window, dictator starmer is now in session. By the way Starmer has in the past defended plastine action, the jury found them not guilty due to their actions prevented a much larger crime (they had sabotaged a military fuel tanker bound to Iraq to fuel bombers in midair).they locked people up last year for posting hurty words online,yet the usual suspects who support Palestine cheered it on thinking the same or worse wouldn't happen to them,people should be carefully for what they wish for I do not think people should be locked up for saying hurry words, what are we coming to? If I am "allowed" to watch people starving and I do not believe the reasons given for starving a group of people, bombing them and killing them as they seemed a threat even though unarmed whist seeking aid. But I cannot comment on it to others. Imagine if we were not allowed to even have this conversation? Voicing support for a terrorist organization isn't having a conversation about it No it creates conversation like this thread, it spreads ideas and sparks the imagination, something the present government is clearly scared of." Quote "Now, footage from two previous gigs is being assessed by counter-terrorism police in the UK. In one, the band allegedly call for the death of Conservative MPs. Another seems to show a band member shouting "up Hamas, up Hezbollah". Both groups are banned in the UK and it is a crime to express support for them." This doesn't appear to encourage conversation, blatant hatred. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Palestine and Ireland have been a common struggle against imperialism for a long time. " The only imperialism in the Palestine territories is pan-Arabist ideology. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The only imperialism in the Palestine territories is pan-Arabist ideology." Yup, the IDF and the settlers are just tourists visiting the Palestinian territories. They are only there for friendly interaction and to learn more about the culture of the five million people who live there. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Who cares "Just my thoughts if you are there, there is lots to go people can vote with there feet, if you like the band I bet you can stream kt somewhere. So who cares. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The only imperialism in the Palestine territories is pan-Arabist ideology. Yup, the IDF and the settlers are just tourists visiting the Palestinian territories. They are only there for friendly interaction and to learn more about the culture of the five million people who live there." The IDF and the settler movement are not the same entity. Maybe look up the meaning of imperialism and then get yourself a lesson in the 7th century Islamic conquests. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is clear to me that to make comment on the issue of Gaza is no longer allowed and to be ignored by all or else they will come get us. Even if the truth is looking us in the face, we are told the narrative that they want us to believe and we are not to sway from it. It seems anyone who makes a comment against the narrative will have their livelihood put at risk, threats of prison or prescribed a terrorist. Yeh free speech out of the window, dictator starmer is now in session. By the way Starmer has in the past defended plastine action, the jury found them not guilty due to their actions prevented a much larger crime (they had sabotaged a military fuel tanker bound to Iraq to fuel bombers in midair).they locked people up last year for posting hurty words online,yet the usual suspects who support Palestine cheered it on thinking the same or worse wouldn't happen to them,people should be carefully for what they wish for I do not think people should be locked up for saying hurry words, what are we coming to? If I am "allowed" to watch people starving and I do not believe the reasons given for starving a group of people, bombing them and killing them as they seemed a threat even though unarmed whist seeking aid. But I cannot comment on it to others. Imagine if we were not allowed to even have this conversation? Voicing support for a terrorist organization isn't having a conversation about it No it creates conversation like this thread, it spreads ideas and sparks the imagination, something the present government is clearly scared of." The problem is that the easily led and gullible are usually the target audience. You could see that when the IDF chant was thrown out there, without any consideration a large amount of people began chanting it too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The IDF and the settler movement are not the same entity." I didn't say they were, I just characterized them both as tourists. "Maybe look up the meaning of imperialism and then get yourself a lesson in the 7th century Islamic conquests." I typed in imperialism and the first thing google came up with was... "a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means." I then googled colonization and it spat out... "the action or process of settling among and establishing control over the indigenous people of an area." I do already know a little about the 7th century but in case you hadn't noticed this is the 21st. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I typed in imperialism and the first thing google came up with was... "a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means." I then googled colonization and it spat out... "the action or process of settling among and establishing control over the indigenous people of an area." I do already know a little about the 7th century but in case you hadn't noticed this is the 21st. " Exactly. Arabs are not indigenous to the Levant, Palestine was never a nation, and returning to your native homeland is not the same as settler colonialism. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Arabs are not indigenous to the Levant, Palestine was never a nation, and returning to your native homeland is not the same as settler colonialism." You brought up the Palestine territories and pan-Arabism. Anyway, I don't want to hijack this thread so perhaps we can continue our conversation on another one some time in the future. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I typed in imperialism and the first thing google came up with was... "a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means." I then googled colonization and it spat out... "the action or process of settling among and establishing control over the indigenous people of an area." I do already know a little about the 7th century but in case you hadn't noticed this is the 21st. Exactly. Arabs are not indigenous to the Levant, Palestine was never a nation, and returning to your native homeland is not the same as settler colonialism. " That’s an interesting way of saying “this is mine mine and mine!” Even though you have been away from it for the best part of 1400 years… give or take! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" That’s an interesting way of saying “this is mine mine and mine!” Even though you have been away from it for the best part of 1400 years… give or take! " If a native people are forcibly ejected from their land by occupiers over the course of several centuries, does this mean they forfeit their right to that land? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I typed in imperialism and the first thing google came up with was... "a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means." I then googled colonization and it spat out... "the action or process of settling among and establishing control over the indigenous people of an area." I do already know a little about the 7th century but in case you hadn't noticed this is the 21st. Exactly. Arabs are not indigenous to the Levant, Palestine was never a nation, and returning to your native homeland is not the same as settler colonialism. That’s an interesting way of saying “this is mine mine and mine!” Even though you have been away from it for the best part of 1400 years… give or take! " At what point in history did Jews lose the right of return to Judaea? 75CE? 150CE? 700CE? 1200CE? 1948CE? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I typed in imperialism and the first thing google came up with was... "a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means." I then googled colonization and it spat out... "the action or process of settling among and establishing control over the indigenous people of an area." I do already know a little about the 7th century but in case you hadn't noticed this is the 21st. Exactly. Arabs are not indigenous to the Levant, Palestine was never a nation, and returning to your native homeland is not the same as settler colonialism. That’s an interesting way of saying “this is mine mine and mine!” Even though you have been away from it for the best part of 1400 years… give or take! At what point in history did Jews lose the right of return to Judaea? 75CE? 150CE? 700CE? 1200CE? 1948CE?" 2023 SM | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"and music isn't about politics " And that's the problem. . There isn't nearly nowhere near enough music about politics which there used to be growing up as a teenager in the late 70's/early 80's. . The punk movement for example. Or identify expression with new wave romanticism. Or any one of a number of scenes which arose in those times. . And it wasn't just limited to the 70's. The 60's in the US saw a massive political & musical movement re Vietnam. . Music may be many things to many people, but politics absolutely has a place in music and is welcomed. Regardless of whether I agree or not with the artist's message is irrelevant. . We need more artists to step forward and challenge the status quo (no pun intended). . Music IS about politics because music is about the human condition, and we all succumb to politics in one way or another. Music is people and people are politics. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"and music isn't about politics And that's the problem. . There isn't nearly nowhere near enough music about politics which there used to be growing up as a teenager in the late 70's/early 80's. . The punk movement for example. Or identify expression with new wave romanticism. Or any one of a number of scenes which arose in those times. . And it wasn't just limited to the 70's. The 60's in the US saw a massive political & musical movement re Vietnam. . Music may be many things to many people, but politics absolutely has a place in music and is welcomed. Regardless of whether I agree or not with the artist's message is irrelevant. . We need more artists to step forward and challenge the status quo (no pun intended). . Music IS about politics because music is about the human condition, and we all succumb to politics in one way or another. Music is people and people are politics. " These people aren’t exactly “challenging the status quo” are they? There views are bog standard Blob orthodoxy. Being “edgy” nowadays consists of regurgitating every belief that the State wants you to hold, on the economy, public services, trade unions, Gaza, Trump, and climate change. I’d get as much rebellion at Glastonbury as I would at a local Labour council planning meeting. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Kneecap’s Glastonbury set will not be broadcast live by the BBC Keir Starmer said they should be banned from the _estival after band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh has been charged with a terrorism offence So much for freedom of speech " Good they're a set of vile scumbags who are supporting a terrorist organisation. Dummies | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"and music isn't about politics And that's the problem. . There isn't nearly nowhere near enough music about politics which there used to be growing up as a teenager in the late 70's/early 80's. . The punk movement for example. Or identify expression with new wave romanticism. Or any one of a number of scenes which arose in those times. . And it wasn't just limited to the 70's. The 60's in the US saw a massive political & musical movement re Vietnam. . Music may be many things to many people, but politics absolutely has a place in music and is welcomed. Regardless of whether I agree or not with the artist's message is irrelevant. . We need more artists to step forward and challenge the status quo (no pun intended). . Music IS about politics because music is about the human condition, and we all succumb to politics in one way or another. Music is people and people are politics. These people aren’t exactly “challenging the status quo” are they? There views are bog standard Blob orthodoxy. Being “edgy” nowadays consists of regurgitating every belief that the State wants you to hold, on the economy, public services, trade unions, Gaza, Trump, and climate change. I’d get as much rebellion at Glastonbury as I would at a local Labour council planning meeting." Amazing. People actually want the government to work EVEN MORE in the favour of big corporations, the fossil fuels industry, whomever donates the most to their election fund, and be even harsher on workers rights, and to ignore climate science even more. What a time to be alive. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Kneecap’s Glastonbury set will not be broadcast live by the BBC Keir Starmer said they should be banned from the _estival after band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh has been charged with a terrorism offence So much for freedom of speech Good they're a set of vile scumbags who are supporting a terrorist organisation. Dummies" Agree here. I haven't paid my TV licence for a long time. The BBC is awful. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Being “edgy” nowadays consists of regurgitating every belief that the State wants you to hold, on the economy, public services, trade unions, Gaza, Trump, and climate change. I’d get as much rebellion at Glastonbury as I would at a local Labour council planning meeting." "Amazing. People actually want the government to work EVEN MORE in the favour of big corporations, the fossil fuels industry, whomever donates the most to their election fund, and be even harsher on workers rights, and to ignore climate science even more." Do you see the Labour government as ignoring climate science? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Given that housewife and mother Lucy Connolly continues to languish in prison for spouting off on social media to her ten followers following the Southport attack, presumably we can now expect these clowns and “Bob Vylan” (who?) to be sent down for a lot longer for their self-publicising rants to wider audiences and on national TV. I’m not holding my breath. The likelihood of being sent to prison for this sort of thing very much depends on whether your opinions accord with the Blob’s world view rather than any objective legal assessment. It’s a pretty sad reflection on the state of education in the UK that white middle class kids out partying think that shouting “Death to the IDF” is some edgy act of rebellion." Lucy Connolly was a Registered Child Minder and made her tweet (viewed by 300,000) on the day 3 little girls were murdered and 10 other people injured. Read the Judge's sentencing report and the one from the Court of Appeal to understand why her got the sentence she did. Whether the band today, and Kneecap have equally broken the law remains to be seen but as others have said the UK and Israeli governments response to terrorism isn't perfect... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. " When Bob and kneecap become political prisoners for their speech, then they will be the same. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I typed in imperialism and the first thing google came up with was... "a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means." I then googled colonization and it spat out... "the action or process of settling among and establishing control over the indigenous people of an area." I do already know a little about the 7th century but in case you hadn't noticed this is the 21st. Exactly. Arabs are not indigenous to the Levant, Palestine was never a nation, and returning to your native homeland is not the same as settler colonialism. That’s an interesting way of saying “this is mine mine and mine!” Even though you have been away from it for the best part of 1400 years… give or take! " I’m sure the Irish nationalists in Northern Ireland might have something to say about that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I typed in imperialism and the first thing google came up with was... "a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means." I then googled colonization and it spat out... "the action or process of settling among and establishing control over the indigenous people of an area." I do already know a little about the 7th century but in case you hadn't noticed this is the 21st. Exactly. Arabs are not indigenous to the Levant, Palestine was never a nation, and returning to your native homeland is not the same as settler colonialism. That’s an interesting way of saying “this is mine mine and mine!” Even though you have been away from it for the best part of 1400 years… give or take! I’m sure the Irish nationalists in Northern Ireland might have something to say about that. " What's that got to do with anything ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. " "Bobby Vylan, real name Pascal Robinson-Foster, is a 34 year old father of one from an affluent middle-class background in Ipswich. He is sole director of two registered entertainment companies, Ghost Theatre Ltd and Lavy Hill Ltd. He is a vegan and has previously performed poetry under the name “Nee Hi”. He once confessed in an interview with Tribune magazine that he started the band Bob Vylan in a bid to "wind people up", score some victories and alleviate boredom." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. " Well neither of the acts you mentioned have called for Israeli genocide. That's the first point. Secondly the usual crowd that back Tommy Robinson to do and say whatever he wants free on consequences now suddenly want anyone who speaks up against the genocide in Palestine to be silenced. For me personally, the difference is, TR wants to spread as much race-hate as possible. The others want the genocide to stop. Having said that, legally speaking, I don't know if what Kneecap said or Bob Vylan said are going to get them in trouble or not. And I personally wouldn't have said those things. The interesting point out of all this is the usual crowd moaning about cancel culture, are now suddenly enthused by cancelling these acts. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Calling for death is not about offence.thats incitement to violence." Additionally, other parts of his speech haven't been broadcast so widely. Like calling his previous Jewish manager a "bald Zionist cunt". | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Calling for death is not about offence.thats incitement to violence." Meanwhile, the UK sells F-35 parts so that the mass slaughter and genocide can continue. People are much more offended by someone chanting "death", than those facilitating actual death. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. " 'Robinson' has multiple convictions and has served three jail sentences, assaulting police, mortgage fraud, harassing and stalking journalists, using a false passport and contempt of court plus others.. He is diametrically opposed to knee cap and the other two I reckon but hardly a logical comparison nor exactly rocket science just who he is.. For the record I've said on here that knee cap have crossed a line and ditto the other two and they will be dealt with.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Meanwhile, the UK sells F-35 parts so that the mass slaughter and genocide can continue. People are much more offended by someone chanting "death", than those facilitating actual death. " It's only a genocide for people who can't do maths. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Meanwhile, the UK sells F-35 parts so that the mass slaughter and genocide can continue. People are much more offended by someone chanting "death", than those facilitating actual death. It's only a genocide for people who can't do maths." If you are suggesting that they haven't slaughtered enough innocent children yet for it to fit your definition of "genocide" fair play to you for shoehorning this in. Meanwhile the UN are saying that the IDF's tactics in Gaza are genocidal. My point stands. People are more offended by a chant than the mass killing of kids. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. Well neither of the acts you mentioned have called for Israeli genocide. That's the first point. Secondly the usual crowd that back Tommy Robinson to do and say whatever he wants free on consequences now suddenly want anyone who speaks up against the genocide in Palestine to be silenced. For me personally, the difference is, TR wants to spread as much race-hate as possible. The others want the genocide to stop. Having said that, legally speaking, I don't know if what Kneecap said or Bob Vylan said are going to get them in trouble or not. And I personally wouldn't have said those things. The interesting point out of all this is the usual crowd moaning about cancel culture, are now suddenly enthused by cancelling these acts. " Maybe look into the meanings behind phrases such as, from the river to the sea, it is calling for an end to Israel and its people. Meanwhile, calling for death of the IDF is a call to kill all Israeli soldiers and has been called out as antisemitism from all areas. Both of those are calling for the end of Jewish people. What I'm witnessing is a normalisation of hate towards Jews, and it obviously doesn't take too much effort to drill the message into the flag waving brain dead sheep at Glastonbury. They chant along to the tune of a dog whistle. The above is what I have seen aimed a Tommy Robinson and his supporters. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. 'Robinson' has multiple convictions and has served three jail sentences, assaulting police, mortgage fraud, harassing and stalking journalists, using a false passport and contempt of court plus others.. He is diametrically opposed to knee cap and the other two I reckon but hardly a logical comparison nor exactly rocket science just who he is.. For the record I've said on here that knee cap have crossed a line and ditto the other two and they will be dealt with.. " They are all at the far left and far right of their views, and have as far as I'm concerned merged into the same ugly thing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. Well neither of the acts you mentioned have called for Israeli genocide. That's the first point. Secondly the usual crowd that back Tommy Robinson to do and say whatever he wants free on consequences now suddenly want anyone who speaks up against the genocide in Palestine to be silenced. For me personally, the difference is, TR wants to spread as much race-hate as possible. The others want the genocide to stop. Having said that, legally speaking, I don't know if what Kneecap said or Bob Vylan said are going to get them in trouble or not. And I personally wouldn't have said those things. The interesting point out of all this is the usual crowd moaning about cancel culture, are now suddenly enthused by cancelling these acts. Maybe look into the meanings behind phrases such as, from the river to the sea, it is calling for an end to Israel and its people. Meanwhile, calling for death of the IDF is a call to kill all Israeli soldiers and has been called out as antisemitism from all areas. Both of those are calling for the end of Jewish people. What I'm witnessing is a normalisation of hate towards Jews, and it obviously doesn't take too much effort to drill the message into the flag waving brain dead sheep at Glastonbury. They chant along to the tune of a dog whistle. The above is what I have seen aimed a Tommy Robinson and his supporters. " What you're witnessing (and participating in) is the demonisation and censorship of anyone who speaks out against genocide. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. 'Robinson' has multiple convictions and has served three jail sentences, assaulting police, mortgage fraud, harassing and stalking journalists, using a false passport and contempt of court plus others.. He is diametrically opposed to knee cap and the other two I reckon but hardly a logical comparison nor exactly rocket science just who he is.. For the record I've said on here that knee cap have crossed a line and ditto the other two and they will be dealt with.. They are all at the far left and far right of their views, and have as far as I'm concerned merged into the same ugly thing." Except you think it appropriate to use Robinson as an adequate comparison.. That's a bit of a stretch given the current situation.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. Well neither of the acts you mentioned have called for Israeli genocide. That's the first point. Secondly the usual crowd that back Tommy Robinson to do and say whatever he wants free on consequences now suddenly want anyone who speaks up against the genocide in Palestine to be silenced. For me personally, the difference is, TR wants to spread as much race-hate as possible. The others want the genocide to stop. Having said that, legally speaking, I don't know if what Kneecap said or Bob Vylan said are going to get them in trouble or not. And I personally wouldn't have said those things. The interesting point out of all this is the usual crowd moaning about cancel culture, are now suddenly enthused by cancelling these acts. Maybe look into the meanings behind phrases such as, from the river to the sea, it is calling for an end to Israel and its people. Meanwhile, calling for death of the IDF is a call to kill all Israeli soldiers and has been called out as antisemitism from all areas. Both of those are calling for the end of Jewish people. What I'm witnessing is a normalisation of hate towards Jews, and it obviously doesn't take too much effort to drill the message into the flag waving brain dead sheep at Glastonbury. They chant along to the tune of a dog whistle. The above is what I have seen aimed a Tommy Robinson and his supporters. What you're witnessing (and participating in) is the demonisation and censorship of anyone who speaks out against genocide. " Aren't they calling for genocide against the Israeli Jews ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. 'Robinson' has multiple convictions and has served three jail sentences, assaulting police, mortgage fraud, harassing and stalking journalists, using a false passport and contempt of court plus others.. He is diametrically opposed to knee cap and the other two I reckon but hardly a logical comparison nor exactly rocket science just who he is.. For the record I've said on here that knee cap have crossed a line and ditto the other two and they will be dealt with.. They are all at the far left and far right of their views, and have as far as I'm concerned merged into the same ugly thing. Except you think it appropriate to use Robinson as an adequate comparison.. That's a bit of a stretch given the current situation.. " Explain how it is a stretch? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. Well neither of the acts you mentioned have called for Israeli genocide. That's the first point. Secondly the usual crowd that back Tommy Robinson to do and say whatever he wants free on consequences now suddenly want anyone who speaks up against the genocide in Palestine to be silenced. For me personally, the difference is, TR wants to spread as much race-hate as possible. The others want the genocide to stop. Having said that, legally speaking, I don't know if what Kneecap said or Bob Vylan said are going to get them in trouble or not. And I personally wouldn't have said those things. The interesting point out of all this is the usual crowd moaning about cancel culture, are now suddenly enthused by cancelling these acts. Maybe look into the meanings behind phrases such as, from the river to the sea, it is calling for an end to Israel and its people. Meanwhile, calling for death of the IDF is a call to kill all Israeli soldiers and has been called out as antisemitism from all areas. Both of those are calling for the end of Jewish people. What I'm witnessing is a normalisation of hate towards Jews, and it obviously doesn't take too much effort to drill the message into the flag waving brain dead sheep at Glastonbury. They chant along to the tune of a dog whistle. The above is what I have seen aimed a Tommy Robinson and his supporters. What you're witnessing (and participating in) is the demonisation and censorship of anyone who speaks out against genocide. " Poor argument, do you recognise the meaning of from the river to the sea? Calling for death, I mean, how can you use whataboutery to deflect and ignore that? I’m not going to get drawn into the usual semantics, you either support the use of phrase calling for death and the removal of Israel from the map or you don’t. You can’t have it both ways. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. 'Robinson' has multiple convictions and has served three jail sentences, assaulting police, mortgage fraud, harassing and stalking journalists, using a false passport and contempt of court plus others.. He is diametrically opposed to knee cap and the other two I reckon but hardly a logical comparison nor exactly rocket science just who he is.. For the record I've said on here that knee cap have crossed a line and ditto the other two and they will be dealt with.. They are all at the far left and far right of their views, and have as far as I'm concerned merged into the same ugly thing. Except you think it appropriate to use Robinson as an adequate comparison.. That's a bit of a stretch given the current situation.. Explain how it is a stretch? " I've laid out clearly above who you've chosen to use against at the moment people not yet charged nor convicted of allegations that your chosen one hasn't had yet to my knowledge.. Your bright enough to know the difference.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. 'Robinson' has multiple convictions and has served three jail sentences, assaulting police, mortgage fraud, harassing and stalking journalists, using a false passport and contempt of court plus others.. He is diametrically opposed to knee cap and the other two I reckon but hardly a logical comparison nor exactly rocket science just who he is.. For the record I've said on here that knee cap have crossed a line and ditto the other two and they will be dealt with.. They are all at the far left and far right of their views, and have as far as I'm concerned merged into the same ugly thing. Except you think it appropriate to use Robinson as an adequate comparison.. That's a bit of a stretch given the current situation.. Explain how it is a stretch? I've laid out clearly above who you've chosen to use against at the moment people not yet charged nor convicted of allegations that your chosen one hasn't had yet to my knowledge.. Your bright enough to know the difference.." I’m not following you here at all. Why does it matter what criminal records any of these people have? Is that your argument on how they are different? All 3 of them call for and promote hate and that is why I can’t see the slightest difference in them. There are right ways and wrong ways of expressing opinion and again all 3 of them would rather stir up mobs to make their points hit home. Their supporters are all the same too, shocking isn’t it, that behaviour can be compared with far right thugs and far left thugs who follow the call for hate. I expect the full weight of the law to be applied to kneecap calling for a riot in August, and for the other idiot who chanted antisemitic nonsense to jump on the bandwagon. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Kneecrap are just a wee sectarian band who feel edgy by supporting terrorism. They're not very good but are being bankrolled to promote their agenda. The irish/palestine links are, and have been, terrorist related for decades To the clown whinging about free speech , would you have objected to a racist band playing Glastonbury? All the wee lefties want free speech, but only if it's speech they agree with." Funny that as your people waving uvf and uda and Israel flags lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. 'Robinson' has multiple convictions and has served three jail sentences, assaulting police, mortgage fraud, harassing and stalking journalists, using a false passport and contempt of court plus others.. He is diametrically opposed to knee cap and the other two I reckon but hardly a logical comparison nor exactly rocket science just who he is.. For the record I've said on here that knee cap have crossed a line and ditto the other two and they will be dealt with.. They are all at the far left and far right of their views, and have as far as I'm concerned merged into the same ugly thing. Except you think it appropriate to use Robinson as an adequate comparison.. That's a bit of a stretch given the current situation.. Explain how it is a stretch? I've laid out clearly above who you've chosen to use against at the moment people not yet charged nor convicted of allegations that your chosen one hasn't had yet to my knowledge.. Your bright enough to know the difference.. I’m not following you here at all. Why does it matter what criminal records any of these people have? Is that your argument on how they are different? All 3 of them call for and promote hate and that is why I can’t see the slightest difference in them. There are right ways and wrong ways of expressing opinion and again all 3 of them would rather stir up mobs to make their points hit home. Their supporters are all the same too, shocking isn’t it, that behaviour can be compared with far right thugs and far left thugs who follow the call for hate. I expect the full weight of the law to be applied to kneecap calling for a riot in August, and for the other idiot who chanted antisemitic nonsense to jump on the bandwagon. " Why him though? It's almost like you chose someone to add to the pot.. The only example he should be perhaps used as is an awful person and not just a racist rabble rouser.. Apart from that I'm in agreement with the rest.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. 'Robinson' has multiple convictions and has served three jail sentences, assaulting police, mortgage fraud, harassing and stalking journalists, using a false passport and contempt of court plus others.. He is diametrically opposed to knee cap and the other two I reckon but hardly a logical comparison nor exactly rocket science just who he is.. For the record I've said on here that knee cap have crossed a line and ditto the other two and they will be dealt with.. They are all at the far left and far right of their views, and have as far as I'm concerned merged into the same ugly thing. Except you think it appropriate to use Robinson as an adequate comparison.. That's a bit of a stretch given the current situation.. Explain how it is a stretch? I've laid out clearly above who you've chosen to use against at the moment people not yet charged nor convicted of allegations that your chosen one hasn't had yet to my knowledge.. Your bright enough to know the difference.. I’m not following you here at all. Why does it matter what criminal records any of these people have? Is that your argument on how they are different? All 3 of them call for and promote hate and that is why I can’t see the slightest difference in them. There are right ways and wrong ways of expressing opinion and again all 3 of them would rather stir up mobs to make their points hit home. Their supporters are all the same too, shocking isn’t it, that behaviour can be compared with far right thugs and far left thugs who follow the call for hate. I expect the full weight of the law to be applied to kneecap calling for a riot in August, and for the other idiot who chanted antisemitic nonsense to jump on the bandwagon. Why him though? It's almost like you chose someone to add to the pot.. The only example he should be perhaps used as is an awful person and not just a racist rabble rouser.. Apart from that I'm in agreement with the rest.." Because I see the others as exactly the same, rabble rousers looking to incite a mob. We can't allow this to happen on any side of the political spectrum, it exposes our (royal) naivety in not being able to deal with far left wing aggression and hate speech, like we have come to deal with the far right. This split is real, it is the driving force behind the 2 tier policing comments, it is pulling the country apart, not just in this but many other areas. Saying that, I think the mood is turning, enough is enough and we should not be listening or supporting chants calling for death or the removal of whole countries and peoples. We should be arguing and presenting forceful debate when it comes to wrong doing but, not by inciting mob rule or supporting those who are using mobs to create the scene. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I typed in imperialism and the first thing google came up with was... "a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means." I then googled colonization and it spat out... "the action or process of settling among and establishing control over the indigenous people of an area." I do already know a little about the 7th century but in case you hadn't noticed this is the 21st. Exactly. Arabs are not indigenous to the Levant, Palestine was never a nation, and returning to your native homeland is not the same as settler colonialism. That’s an interesting way of saying “this is mine mine and mine!” Even though you have been away from it for the best part of 1400 years… give or take! I’m sure the Irish nationalists in Northern Ireland might have something to say about that. What's that got to do with anything ?" Ownership of land is a line drawing exercise. Northern Ireland has been under British rule for a very long time. Does that mean the nationalists don’t have a valid claim to return it to Irish rule? How long is too long? Who decides? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. Well neither of the acts you mentioned have called for Israeli genocide. That's the first point. Secondly the usual crowd that back Tommy Robinson to do and say whatever he wants free on consequences now suddenly want anyone who speaks up against the genocide in Palestine to be silenced. For me personally, the difference is, TR wants to spread as much race-hate as possible. The others want the genocide to stop. Having said that, legally speaking, I don't know if what Kneecap said or Bob Vylan said are going to get them in trouble or not. And I personally wouldn't have said those things. The interesting point out of all this is the usual crowd moaning about cancel culture, are now suddenly enthused by cancelling these acts. Maybe look into the meanings behind phrases such as, from the river to the sea, it is calling for an end to Israel and its people. Meanwhile, calling for death of the IDF is a call to kill all Israeli soldiers and has been called out as antisemitism from all areas. Both of those are calling for the end of Jewish people. What I'm witnessing is a normalisation of hate towards Jews, and it obviously doesn't take too much effort to drill the message into the flag waving brain dead sheep at Glastonbury. They chant along to the tune of a dog whistle. The above is what I have seen aimed a Tommy Robinson and his supporters. What you're witnessing (and participating in) is the demonisation and censorship of anyone who speaks out against genocide. Aren't they calling for genocide against the Israeli Jews ?" No | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. Well neither of the acts you mentioned have called for Israeli genocide. That's the first point. Secondly the usual crowd that back Tommy Robinson to do and say whatever he wants free on consequences now suddenly want anyone who speaks up against the genocide in Palestine to be silenced. For me personally, the difference is, TR wants to spread as much race-hate as possible. The others want the genocide to stop. Having said that, legally speaking, I don't know if what Kneecap said or Bob Vylan said are going to get them in trouble or not. And I personally wouldn't have said those things. The interesting point out of all this is the usual crowd moaning about cancel culture, are now suddenly enthused by cancelling these acts. Maybe look into the meanings behind phrases such as, from the river to the sea, it is calling for an end to Israel and its people. Meanwhile, calling for death of the IDF is a call to kill all Israeli soldiers and has been called out as antisemitism from all areas. Both of those are calling for the end of Jewish people. What I'm witnessing is a normalisation of hate towards Jews, and it obviously doesn't take too much effort to drill the message into the flag waving brain dead sheep at Glastonbury. They chant along to the tune of a dog whistle. The above is what I have seen aimed a Tommy Robinson and his supporters. What you're witnessing (and participating in) is the demonisation and censorship of anyone who speaks out against genocide. Poor argument, do you recognise the meaning of from the river to the sea? Calling for death, I mean, how can you use whataboutery to deflect and ignore that? I’m not going to get drawn into the usual semantics, you either support the use of phrase calling for death and the removal of Israel from the map or you don’t. You can’t have it both ways. " You either support the censorship of people who oppose genocide or you don't. You've added 1000% extra made up meaning to what was said, and trying to turn it into something it wasn't to demonise people who speak out against genocide. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. Well neither of the acts you mentioned have called for Israeli genocide. That's the first point. Secondly the usual crowd that back Tommy Robinson to do and say whatever he wants free on consequences now suddenly want anyone who speaks up against the genocide in Palestine to be silenced. For me personally, the difference is, TR wants to spread as much race-hate as possible. The others want the genocide to stop. Having said that, legally speaking, I don't know if what Kneecap said or Bob Vylan said are going to get them in trouble or not. And I personally wouldn't have said those things. The interesting point out of all this is the usual crowd moaning about cancel culture, are now suddenly enthused by cancelling these acts. Maybe look into the meanings behind phrases such as, from the river to the sea, it is calling for an end to Israel and its people. Meanwhile, calling for death of the IDF is a call to kill all Israeli soldiers and has been called out as antisemitism from all areas. Both of those are calling for the end of Jewish people. What I'm witnessing is a normalisation of hate towards Jews, and it obviously doesn't take too much effort to drill the message into the flag waving brain dead sheep at Glastonbury. They chant along to the tune of a dog whistle. The above is what I have seen aimed a Tommy Robinson and his supporters. What you're witnessing (and participating in) is the demonisation and censorship of anyone who speaks out against genocide. Poor argument, do you recognise the meaning of from the river to the sea? Calling for death, I mean, how can you use whataboutery to deflect and ignore that? I’m not going to get drawn into the usual semantics, you either support the use of phrase calling for death and the removal of Israel from the map or you don’t. You can’t have it both ways. You either support the censorship of people who oppose genocide or you don't. You've added 1000% extra made up meaning to what was said, and trying to turn it into something it wasn't to demonise people who speak out against genocide. " This is not about censorship, this is about the call to action for death and hate. I'm sorry Johnny but you are burying your head in the sand if you are arguing that they haven't over stepped the mark by calling for death and using a chant that is regarded as being antisemitic. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is sad that so many people can't recognise chants for Israeli genocide or support calls for violence, specifically call for riots on the streets of Westminster. What is the cause of this, not paying attention or something else? What is the difference between Bob Vylan, kneecap and Tommy Robinson, they all sound the same to me. Well neither of the acts you mentioned have called for Israeli genocide. That's the first point. Secondly the usual crowd that back Tommy Robinson to do and say whatever he wants free on consequences now suddenly want anyone who speaks up against the genocide in Palestine to be silenced. For me personally, the difference is, TR wants to spread as much race-hate as possible. The others want the genocide to stop. Having said that, legally speaking, I don't know if what Kneecap said or Bob Vylan said are going to get them in trouble or not. And I personally wouldn't have said those things. The interesting point out of all this is the usual crowd moaning about cancel culture, are now suddenly enthused by cancelling these acts. Maybe look into the meanings behind phrases such as, from the river to the sea, it is calling for an end to Israel and its people. Meanwhile, calling for death of the IDF is a call to kill all Israeli soldiers and has been called out as antisemitism from all areas. Both of those are calling for the end of Jewish people. What I'm witnessing is a normalisation of hate towards Jews, and it obviously doesn't take too much effort to drill the message into the flag waving brain dead sheep at Glastonbury. They chant along to the tune of a dog whistle. The above is what I have seen aimed a Tommy Robinson and his supporters. What you're witnessing (and participating in) is the demonisation and censorship of anyone who speaks out against genocide. Poor argument, do you recognise the meaning of from the river to the sea? Calling for death, I mean, how can you use whataboutery to deflect and ignore that? I’m not going to get drawn into the usual semantics, you either support the use of phrase calling for death and the removal of Israel from the map or you don’t. You can’t have it both ways. You either support the censorship of people who oppose genocide or you don't. You've added 1000% extra made up meaning to what was said, and trying to turn it into something it wasn't to demonise people who speak out against genocide. This is not about censorship, this is about the call to action for death and hate. I'm sorry Johnny but you are burying your head in the sand if you are arguing that they haven't over stepped the mark by calling for death and using a chant that is regarded as being antisemitic. " I haven't argued that they haven't overstepped the mark. I've been very clear. You've added on lots of additional meaning to what was said. That's quite frankly nonsense, and it's a repeat of what I've seen in the right wing media. It's specifically designed to demonise these people who speak up about the genocide. The net result is people are more outraged by some words, than they are about the mass slaughter of innocent kids and people. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Calling for death to people is wrong, but yesterday in the Gaza death camp,over 20 people were blasted to death in a sea side cafe including journalists " It could be up to 38 plus dozens critically injured.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Calling for death to people is wrong, but yesterday in the Gaza death camp,over 20 people were blasted to death in a sea side cafe including journalists It could be up to 38 plus dozens critically injured.. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Calling for death to people is wrong, but yesterday in the Gaza death camp, over 20 people were blasted to death in a sea side cafe including journalists " So calling for more deaths is probably not a good thing? I’ve not seen anyone in this forum advocating for more Palestinian deaths. Even those on the Israeli side of the larger debate would agree that the killing needs to stop. But killing Israelis is not going to bring that about and neither is calling for their deaths. The chants were neither helpful or lawful. Not everyone who breaks the law gets prosecuted tho. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Calling for death to people is wrong, but yesterday in the Gaza death camp,over 20 people were blasted to death in a sea side cafe including journalists It could be up to 38 plus dozens critically injured.. " Wondering if any Hamas in that cafe ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Calling for death to people is wrong, but yesterday in the Gaza death camp,over 20 people were blasted to death in a sea side cafe including journalists It could be up to 38 plus dozens critically injured.. Wondering if any Hamas in that cafe ?" Does it make any difference? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Calling for death to people is wrong, but yesterday in the Gaza death camp,over 20 people were blasted to death in a sea side cafe including journalists It could be up to 38 plus dozens critically injured.. Wondering if any Hamas in that cafe ? Does it make any difference?" It had a decent internet connection apparently.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Calling for death to people is wrong, but yesterday in the Gaza death camp,over 20 people were blasted to death in a sea side cafe including journalists It could be up to 38 plus dozens critically injured.. Wondering if any Hamas in that cafe ? Does it make any difference?" The Israeli lavender system tells them where to target irrespective of any other people there, whoever they may be. Hence the colossal number of civilians killed. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"In a death camp,no lives matter," No, but chants at a music _estival seem to. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"In a death camp,no lives matter, No, but chants at a music _estival seem to." The reality Vylan may get three years in hmp while our government have colluded with IDF and the RAF have conducted at least 518 sortees identifying targets in Gaza. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"In a death camp,no lives matter," 2 million people, half of them children. Bombed in their beds. For perspective 1.3 million were sent to Auschwitz | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. " There have been protests in Gaza against Hamas.. No doubt as is par for the course there are plans and resources available by powers opposed to Hamas to take that further if they can make the right connections.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There have been protests in Gaza against Hamas.. No doubt as is par for the course there are plans and resources available by powers opposed to Hamas to take that further if they can make the right connections.. " International pressure as well as local pressure. Egypt, Qatar, Iran and other Gulf states, why are they not doing more to bring this to a close? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why?" Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why? Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? " B. No, Benji has his next excuse for continuing the slaughter. The complete annihilation of Gaza population and its annexation is inevitable. The same will happen in the West Bank, give it 10 years. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why? Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? " Your response avoids the issue of joint accountability. Israel’s actions have caused immense suffering but that doesn’t remove Hamas’s role in this. Demanding action from both sides isn’t a denial of Israeli action it’s a valid ask to break the cycle. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why? Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? B. No, Benji has his next excuse for continuing the slaughter. The complete annihilation of Gaza population and its annexation is inevitable. The same will happen in the West Bank, give it 10 years." You have just made my point. If annihilation is inevitable, according to you, then why wouldn’t people challenge Hamas? The very group that you say gives Netanyahu the justification to continue the conflict? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why? Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? Your response avoids the issue of joint accountability. Israel’s actions have caused immense suffering but that doesn’t remove Hamas’s role in this. Demanding action from both sides isn’t a denial of Israeli action it’s a valid ask to break the cycle. " Your suggestion avoids responsibility from those currently engaging in genocidal activities. My reply highlighted that the slaughter won't abate if people protest against Hamas. Protesting against the British government fascinating genocide is vital. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Did Hamas not agree to the ceasefire,but Netanyahu wouldn't move to the 2nd phase,it is in his interest to keep the war going " Hamas and Israel both refused to move to phase 2, call it a trust issue... Your other point, hear this a lot, why is it in his interest to keep the war going? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why? Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? Your response avoids the issue of joint accountability. Israel’s actions have caused immense suffering but that doesn’t remove Hamas’s role in this. Demanding action from both sides isn’t a denial of Israeli action it’s a valid ask to break the cycle. Your suggestion avoids responsibility from those currently engaging in genocidal activities. My reply highlighted that the slaughter won't abate if people protest against Hamas. Protesting against the British government fascinating genocide is vital." No it doesn't I was very clear about Israel and accountability, but you are still giving Hamas the free pass, why specifically? Also you avoided the question, why other countries such as Egypt, Qatar, Iran and other Gulf states are not putting pressure on Hamas to bring this to an end. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why? Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? Your response avoids the issue of joint accountability. Israel’s actions have caused immense suffering but that doesn’t remove Hamas’s role in this. Demanding action from both sides isn’t a denial of Israeli action it’s a valid ask to break the cycle. Your suggestion avoids responsibility from those currently engaging in genocidal activities. My reply highlighted that the slaughter won't abate if people protest against Hamas. Protesting against the British government fascinating genocide is vital. No it doesn't I was very clear about Israel and accountability, but you are still giving Hamas the free pass, why specifically? Also you avoided the question, why other countries such as Egypt, Qatar, Iran and other Gulf states are not putting pressure on Hamas to bring this to an end. " I'm not giving Hamas a "free pass". I assume those country's aren't putting any pressure on Hamas because there's absolutely nothing Hamas can do to end the slaughter. Returning the hostages won't make any difference. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why? Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? Your response avoids the issue of joint accountability. Israel’s actions have caused immense suffering but that doesn’t remove Hamas’s role in this. Demanding action from both sides isn’t a denial of Israeli action it’s a valid ask to break the cycle. Your suggestion avoids responsibility from those currently engaging in genocidal activities. My reply highlighted that the slaughter won't abate if people protest against Hamas. Protesting against the British government fascinating genocide is vital. No it doesn't I was very clear about Israel and accountability, but you are still giving Hamas the free pass, why specifically? Also you avoided the question, why other countries such as Egypt, Qatar, Iran and other Gulf states are not putting pressure on Hamas to bring this to an end. I'm not giving Hamas a "free pass". I assume those country's aren't putting any pressure on Hamas because there's absolutely nothing Hamas can do to end the slaughter. Returning the hostages won't make any difference. " Returning the hostages certainly wouldn't hurt now would it ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why? Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? Your response avoids the issue of joint accountability. Israel’s actions have caused immense suffering but that doesn’t remove Hamas’s role in this. Demanding action from both sides isn’t a denial of Israeli action it’s a valid ask to break the cycle. Your suggestion avoids responsibility from those currently engaging in genocidal activities. My reply highlighted that the slaughter won't abate if people protest against Hamas. Protesting against the British government fascinating genocide is vital. No it doesn't I was very clear about Israel and accountability, but you are still giving Hamas the free pass, why specifically? Also you avoided the question, why other countries such as Egypt, Qatar, Iran and other Gulf states are not putting pressure on Hamas to bring this to an end. I'm not giving Hamas a "free pass". I assume those country's aren't putting any pressure on Hamas because there's absolutely nothing Hamas can do to end the slaughter. Returning the hostages won't make any difference. " You say you’re not giving Hamas a free pass, but you have argued that they have nothing they can do to stop the war. That’s simply not true. They could surrender, they could release the hostages, they could halt their military operations. Those are all options that could shift the outcome of this war and potentially save the lives of many Palestinians. Claiming they are powerless while ignoring they have choices is giving them a pass. Condemning Israel’s conduct is not an issue and Israel should be challenged when it is acting unlawfully or creating humanitarian suffering. However, I would also expect to see the same condemnation of Hamas, but where is the condemnation for their lack of accountability towards their people and the suffering they are having to endure? To bring about change, challenge both sides for keeping the conflict going. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why? Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? Your response avoids the issue of joint accountability. Israel’s actions have caused immense suffering but that doesn’t remove Hamas’s role in this. Demanding action from both sides isn’t a denial of Israeli action it’s a valid ask to break the cycle. Your suggestion avoids responsibility from those currently engaging in genocidal activities. My reply highlighted that the slaughter won't abate if people protest against Hamas. Protesting against the British government fascinating genocide is vital. No it doesn't I was very clear about Israel and accountability, but you are still giving Hamas the free pass, why specifically? Also you avoided the question, why other countries such as Egypt, Qatar, Iran and other Gulf states are not putting pressure on Hamas to bring this to an end. I'm not giving Hamas a "free pass". I assume those country's aren't putting any pressure on Hamas because there's absolutely nothing Hamas can do to end the slaughter. Returning the hostages won't make any difference. You say you’re not giving Hamas a free pass, but you have argued that they have nothing they can do to stop the war. That’s simply not true. They could surrender, they could release the hostages, they could halt their military operations. Those are all options that could shift the outcome of this war and potentially save the lives of many Palestinians. Claiming they are powerless while ignoring they have choices is giving them a pass. Condemning Israel’s conduct is not an issue and Israel should be challenged when it is acting unlawfully or creating humanitarian suffering. However, I would also expect to see the same condemnation of Hamas, but where is the condemnation for their lack of accountability towards their people and the suffering they are having to endure? To bring about change, challenge both sides for keeping the conflict going." I don't know what you're smoking if you think Hamas surrendering would some how end the slaughter. Surely the first port of call would be to ask those committing the atrocities to stop. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why? Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? Your response avoids the issue of joint accountability. Israel’s actions have caused immense suffering but that doesn’t remove Hamas’s role in this. Demanding action from both sides isn’t a denial of Israeli action it’s a valid ask to break the cycle. Your suggestion avoids responsibility from those currently engaging in genocidal activities. My reply highlighted that the slaughter won't abate if people protest against Hamas. Protesting against the British government fascinating genocide is vital. No it doesn't I was very clear about Israel and accountability, but you are still giving Hamas the free pass, why specifically? Also you avoided the question, why other countries such as Egypt, Qatar, Iran and other Gulf states are not putting pressure on Hamas to bring this to an end. I'm not giving Hamas a "free pass". I assume those country's aren't putting any pressure on Hamas because there's absolutely nothing Hamas can do to end the slaughter. Returning the hostages won't make any difference. You say you’re not giving Hamas a free pass, but you have argued that they have nothing they can do to stop the war. That’s simply not true. They could surrender, they could release the hostages, they could halt their military operations. Those are all options that could shift the outcome of this war and potentially save the lives of many Palestinians. Claiming they are powerless while ignoring they have choices is giving them a pass. Condemning Israel’s conduct is not an issue and Israel should be challenged when it is acting unlawfully or creating humanitarian suffering. However, I would also expect to see the same condemnation of Hamas, but where is the condemnation for their lack of accountability towards their people and the suffering they are having to endure? To bring about change, challenge both sides for keeping the conflict going. I don't know what you're smoking if you think Hamas surrendering would some how end the slaughter. Surely the first port of call would be to ask those committing the atrocities to stop." Exactly, that includes Hamas. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why? Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? Your response avoids the issue of joint accountability. Israel’s actions have caused immense suffering but that doesn’t remove Hamas’s role in this. Demanding action from both sides isn’t a denial of Israeli action it’s a valid ask to break the cycle. Your suggestion avoids responsibility from those currently engaging in genocidal activities. My reply highlighted that the slaughter won't abate if people protest against Hamas. Protesting against the British government fascinating genocide is vital. No it doesn't I was very clear about Israel and accountability, but you are still giving Hamas the free pass, why specifically? Also you avoided the question, why other countries such as Egypt, Qatar, Iran and other Gulf states are not putting pressure on Hamas to bring this to an end. I'm not giving Hamas a "free pass". I assume those country's aren't putting any pressure on Hamas because there's absolutely nothing Hamas can do to end the slaughter. Returning the hostages won't make any difference. You say you’re not giving Hamas a free pass, but you have argued that they have nothing they can do to stop the war. That’s simply not true. They could surrender, they could release the hostages, they could halt their military operations. Those are all options that could shift the outcome of this war and potentially save the lives of many Palestinians. Claiming they are powerless while ignoring they have choices is giving them a pass. Condemning Israel’s conduct is not an issue and Israel should be challenged when it is acting unlawfully or creating humanitarian suffering. However, I would also expect to see the same condemnation of Hamas, but where is the condemnation for their lack of accountability towards their people and the suffering they are having to endure? To bring about change, challenge both sides for keeping the conflict going. I don't know what you're smoking if you think Hamas surrendering would some how end the slaughter. Surely the first port of call would be to ask those committing the atrocities to stop. Exactly, that includes Hamas." Whatever gets the IDF to stop their genocidal activities. But let's be realistic. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"In a death camp,no lives matter, 2 million people, half of them children. Bombed in their beds. For perspective 1.3 million were sent to Auschwitz" Over 6 million Jews were killed in the holocaust. All civilians. No terrorists hiding amongst them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"In a death camp,no lives matter, 2 million people, half of them children. Bombed in their beds. For perspective 1.3 million were sent to Auschwitz Over 6 million Jews were killed in the holocaust. All civilians. No terrorists hiding amongst them. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"In a death camp,no lives matter, 2 million people, half of them children. Bombed in their beds. For perspective 1.3 million were sent to Auschwitz Over 6 million Jews were killed in the holocaust. All civilians. No terrorists hiding amongst them. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Terrorists hiding among the civilian population, don't give you a right to carpet bomb an area,If a ceasefire fire happens Netanyahu knows he has a court case to answer against him" Well quite. Would the IDF bomb hospitals in their own territory if they suspected Hamas had someone hiding in there. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Terrorists hiding among the civilian population, don't give you a right to carpet bomb an area,If a ceasefire fire happens Netanyahu knows he has a court case to answer against him Well quite. Would the IDF bomb hospitals in their own territory if they suspected Hamas had someone hiding in there." What surprises me most is why nearly 200 countries on the globe have not stepped in and taken the refugees out of the firing line. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Terrorists hiding among the civilian population, don't give you a right to carpet bomb an area,If a ceasefire fire happens Netanyahu knows he has a court case to answer against him" The court case within Israel ref corruption has begun with 60 witnesses having already testified. It is expected to finalise in 2026. Is there another court case you are referring to? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Terrorists hiding among the civilian population, don't give you a right to carpet bomb an area,If a ceasefire fire happens Netanyahu knows he has a court case to answer against him" This isn't going to go down well but the minute a terrorist group realises that you won't fire upon a group, area, or building because there are innocents located there, is the minute they'll put innocents in all their installations and you may as well give up | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"People should start openly challenging Hamas for their part in the continuation of war or there will be no change. There are 2 sides in this war ignoring one side over the other, why? Do you think that A. Protesting against Hamas is high on the agenda of Palestinians who are currently being bombed and starved to death by the IDF And/or B. Protesting against Hamas would slow down the slaughter of innocent civilians? Your response avoids the issue of joint accountability. Israel’s actions have caused immense suffering but that doesn’t remove Hamas’s role in this. Demanding action from both sides isn’t a denial of Israeli action it’s a valid ask to break the cycle. " Bo I haven't made your point. Your point is Hamas surrendering could stop this. My point it won't, because the world as decided to give Israel a free pass on anything, absolutely anything it does in Gaza and the West Bank now. October the 7th was a once in alife opportunity for Netanyahu to finally justify the Great Israel project, nothing is gong to stop them now. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Kneecrap are just a wee sectarian band who feel edgy by supporting terrorism. They're not very good but are being bankrolled to promote their agenda. The irish/palestine links are, and have been, terrorist related for decades To the clown whinging about free speech , would you have objected to a racist band playing Glastonbury? All the wee lefties want free speech, but only if it's speech they agree with." Looking forward to your comments on the annual "Ki*l all Taigs" and "Fu*k the pope" Hatefest. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Terrorists hiding among the civilian population, don't give you a right to carpet bomb an area,If a ceasefire fire happens Netanyahu knows he has a court case to answer against him This isn't going to go down well but the minute a terrorist group realises that you won't fire upon a group, area, or building because there are innocents located there, is the minute they'll put innocents in all their installations and you may as well give up " That is exactly why Hamas took so many hostages, to use as a human shield in the hope Isreal wouldn’t use the big guns. I don’t see anyone calling for Hamas to be brought to justice for their illegal acts that triggered this round of conflict. And don’t they still hold hostages? A cease fire is much more advantageous to Hamas than it is to Isreal. I think Isreal see this as an opportunity to get the job done permanently, or a least for a generation. Unfortunately even if they did, I think we’ll be discussing this very same topic again in 10 years time, if not sooner | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Kneecrap are just a wee sectarian band who feel edgy by supporting terrorism. They're not very good but are being bankrolled to promote their agenda. The irish/palestine links are, and have been, terrorist related for decades To the clown whinging about free speech , would you have objected to a racist band playing Glastonbury? All the wee lefties want free speech, but only if it's speech they agree with. Funny that as your people waving uvf and uda and Israel flags lol" Who are my people you mad sectarian, racist bigot? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Given that housewife and mother Lucy Connolly continues to languish in prison for spouting off on social media to her ten followers following the Southport attack, presumably we can now expect these clowns and “Bob Vylan” (who?) to be sent down for a lot longer for their self-publicising rants to wider audiences and on national TV. I’m not holding my breath. The likelihood of being sent to prison for this sort of thing very much depends on whether your opinions accord with the Blob’s world view rather than any objective legal assessment. It’s a pretty sad reflection on the state of education in the UK that white middle class kids out partying think that shouting “Death to the IDF” is some edgy act of rebellion." Did you read the Judges summing up on the Connelly case? How many times her post was shared, before it was removed? What was in her post? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Ordinarily yes Hamas handing over the remaining hostages should in theory end the conflict. In reality though, I really have my doubts. This Israeli government decided to invade & bomb Syria whilst it was in the midst of regime change, so Syria was hardly a threat at that point, but they went in invading & bombing regardless. Israel are ruthless." Our taxes have contributed to the killing 518 RAF sortees completed for the IDF. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Terrorists hiding among the civilian population, don't give you a right to carpet bomb an area,If a ceasefire fire happens Netanyahu knows he has a court case to answer against him Well quite. Would the IDF bomb hospitals in their own territory if they suspected Hamas had someone hiding in there. What surprises me most is why nearly 200 countries on the globe have not stepped in and taken the refugees out of the firing line. " look at what happend to lebenon when they took a load of Palestinians in,used to be a pretty stable country until then,think Jordan also had a lot of problems when they took a load in,that's why you don't see many countries including the Arab world offering to take them in,although I wouldn't be surprised if kier welcomes them with open arms,what people keep forgetting is the people of gaza voted hamas in knowing exactly what they were all about | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" what people keep forgetting is the people of gaza voted hamas in knowing exactly what they were all about" It's a little more complicated than that, the war between Fatah and Hamas with the former being backed by the CIA in order to wipe out the latter is relevant.. UK and the EU were also involved to a lesser degree in trying to prevent Hamas winning elections by taking them out but Hamas was one step ahead and did the same to Fatah.. As democracy goes the people literally had a choice between two sets of brutal terrorists backed by the west or Iran.. One lot took the other lot out so the choice was literally support them or as happened oppose them and pay the price.. Complete mess.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bob Vylan’s statement: “Not the first. Not the last,” the statement began. “Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band.” “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use ‘unnecessary lethal force’ against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza,” it added. “We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction.” “The government doesn’t want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren’t doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving? The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction,” it continued. “We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too. Free Palestine.”" If only he had said the above at the time and not called for death and violence. Bless him | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bob Vylan’s statement: “Not the first. Not the last,” the statement began. “Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band.” “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use ‘unnecessary lethal force’ against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza,” it added. “We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction.” “The government doesn’t want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren’t doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving? The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction,” it continued. “We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too. Free Palestine.” If only he had said the above at the time and not called for death and violence. Bless him" Would that have drawn the same attention to the actual death and violence that's actually happening? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bob Vylan’s statement: “Not the first. Not the last,” the statement began. “Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band.” “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use ‘unnecessary lethal force’ against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza,” it added. “We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction.” “The government doesn’t want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren’t doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving? The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction,” it continued. “We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too. Free Palestine.” If only he had said the above at the time and not called for death and violence. Bless him Would that have drawn the same attention to the actual death and violence that's actually happening?" A song about innocent people dying in Palestine maybe ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bob Vylan’s statement: “Not the first. Not the last,” the statement began. “Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band.” “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use ‘unnecessary lethal force’ against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza,” it added. “We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction.” “The government doesn’t want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren’t doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving? The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction,” it continued. “We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too. Free Palestine.” If only he had said the above at the time and not called for death and violence. Bless him Would that have drawn the same attention to the actual death and violence that's actually happening? A song about innocent people dying in Palestine maybe ?" Problem ...they can't fucking sing  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bob Vylan’s statement: “Not the first. Not the last,” the statement began. “Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band.” “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use ‘unnecessary lethal force’ against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza,” it added. “We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction.” “The government doesn’t want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren’t doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving? The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction,” it continued. “We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too. Free Palestine.” If only he had said the above at the time and not called for death and violence. Bless him Would that have drawn the same attention to the actual death and violence that's actually happening? A song about innocent people dying in Palestine maybe ?" Not sure it would gain as much attention. There are still people on here pretending there's no genocide, and one chap even advocated for ethnic cleansing. Must be what it was like around certain parts in the 1940s. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bob Vylan’s statement: “Not the first. Not the last,” the statement began. “Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band.” “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use ‘unnecessary lethal force’ against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza,” it added. “We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction.” “The government doesn’t want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren’t doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving? The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction,” it continued. “We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too. Free Palestine.” If only he had said the above at the time and not called for death and violence. Bless him Would that have drawn the same attention to the actual death and violence that's actually happening?" I think you are frustrated with the lack of action not attention. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bob Vylan’s statement: “Not the first. Not the last,” the statement began. “Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band.” “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use ‘unnecessary lethal force’ against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza,” it added. “We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction.” “The government doesn’t want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren’t doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving? The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction,” it continued. “We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too. Free Palestine.” If only he had said the above at the time and not called for death and violence. Bless him Would that have drawn the same attention to the actual death and violence that's actually happening? I think you are frustrated with the lack of action not attention. " Yes that's true. But it's not related to the point I made. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bob Vylan’s statement: “Not the first. Not the last,” the statement began. “Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band.” “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use ‘unnecessary lethal force’ against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza,” it added. “We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction.” “The government doesn’t want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren’t doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving? The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction,” it continued. “We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too. Free Palestine.” If only he had said the above at the time and not called for death and violence. Bless him Would that have drawn the same attention to the actual death and violence that's actually happening? I think you are frustrated with the lack of action not attention. Yes that's true. But it's not related to the point I made. " You don't think there is enough attention? What does more attention look like? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bob Vylan’s statement: “Not the first. Not the last,” the statement began. “Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band.” “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use ‘unnecessary lethal force’ against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza,” it added. “We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction.” “The government doesn’t want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren’t doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving? The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction,” it continued. “We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too. Free Palestine.” If only he had said the above at the time and not called for death and violence. Bless him Would that have drawn the same attention to the actual death and violence that's actually happening? I think you are frustrated with the lack of action not attention. Yes that's true. But it's not related to the point I made. You don't think there is enough attention? What does more attention look like? " I don't know if there is enough attention. Why do you think that I think there isn't enough attention? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bob Vylan’s statement: “Not the first. Not the last,” the statement began. “Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band.” “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use ‘unnecessary lethal force’ against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza,” it added. “We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction.” “The government doesn’t want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren’t doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving? The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction,” it continued. “We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too. Free Palestine.” If only he had said the above at the time and not called for death and violence. Bless him Would that have drawn the same attention to the actual death and violence that's actually happening? I think you are frustrated with the lack of action not attention. Yes that's true. But it's not related to the point I made. You don't think there is enough attention? What does more attention look like? I don't know if there is enough attention. Why do you think that I think there isn't enough attention?" Why do you think that I think that it's a shame you're back and posting your usual nonsense? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bob Vylan’s statement: “Not the first. Not the last,” the statement began. “Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band.” “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use ‘unnecessary lethal force’ against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza,” it added. “We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction.” “The government doesn’t want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren’t doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving? The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction,” it continued. “We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too. Free Palestine.” If only he had said the above at the time and not called for death and violence. Bless him Would that have drawn the same attention to the actual death and violence that's actually happening? I think you are frustrated with the lack of action not attention. Yes that's true. But it's not related to the point I made. You don't think there is enough attention? What does more attention look like? I don't know if there is enough attention. Why do you think that I think there isn't enough attention? Why do you think that I think that it's a shame you're back and posting your usual nonsense?" Because you have some kind of beef with me, even though the other chap got confused and asked me about something I didn't say. Is that about right? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
" " You say it best when you say nothing at all?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Two attacks, lightweights. Gaza completely destroyed and two million homeless " Thanks for putting it into perspective. Nothing to see here, then. Hey... Want to set fire to just ONE mosque later, and beat up only two hijab-wearing women? We can say it's in retaliation for [insert some random act or war here], and possibly burn down a Chinese restaurant for... Uighurs? Seems lightweight enough. Maybe vandalise a Russian shop for Ukraine? Just one. Oh, and let's also find some random black dude (just one) and break his legs for the white African genocide. Barely a drop, considering the true extent of the crimes of these "groups". They mustn't complain, it could be so much worse, as it is for people that they don't know in countries they've never been to... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia." It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia." Correction: protestors. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism." Reap what they sow. Don’t expect to bomb women and children and not get a backlash somewhere else. The IDF are Hamas with a different flag. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Reap what they sow. Don’t expect to bomb women and children and not get a backlash somewhere else. The IDF are Hamas with a different flag. " So when do we go after the mosques for being Hamas? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism." I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. " Do you support the actions of the thugs in Australia, or have I misunderstood your whataboutery? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. " Are you suggesting that the Melbourne attacks were not anti-Semitism? Or are you suggesting that the Melbourne attacks were justified? Or are you referring to something else altogether? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. Do you support the actions of the thugs in Australia, or have I misunderstood your whataboutery? " Of course I don't support any kind of violence. What a stupid thing to say. Iam against all violence, especially the genocide in Palestine. Glad to be on the right side of history instead of buying into the disgusting cover up attempt by the British government and American government. Like I said very sickening and scary. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. " your not seeing a genocide your seeing ethnic cleansing, if you were watching a genocide the Israelis would of had it all wrapoed up in the first year its not even close to a genocide | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. your not seeing a genocide your seeing ethnic cleansing, if you were watching a genocide the Israelis would of had it all wrapoed up in the first year its not even close to a genocide" Are you playing down the slaughtering of innocent people? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. your not seeing a genocide your seeing ethnic cleansing, if you were watching a genocide the Israelis would of had it all wrapoed up in the first year its not even close to a genocide Are you playing down the slaughtering of innocent people?" nope just pointing out its ethnic cleansing not even close to a genocide are they being cunts yea without a doubt but when you keep calling it genocide you are just making the word worthless bit like wen peoole throw facist around all the time, if it was a genocide there would be a lot lot more people dead, personaly i think we should stay well out of it and let both sides off each other | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. your not seeing a genocide your seeing ethnic cleansing, if you were watching a genocide the Israelis would of had it all wrapoed up in the first year its not even close to a genocide Are you playing down the slaughtering of innocent people?nope just pointing out its ethnic cleansing not even close to a genocide are they being cunts yea without a doubt but when you keep calling it genocide you are just making the word worthless bit like wen peoole throw facist around all the time, if it was a genocide there would be a lot lot more people dead, personaly i think we should stay well out of it and let both sides off each other" OK, so yes, you are playing down the slaughtering of innocent people caused by British and American weapons. What is wrong with people today? Is absolutely stomach churning. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" OK, so yes, you are playing down the slaughtering of innocent people caused by British and American weapons. What is wrong with people today? Is absolutely stomach churning. " Funny, how you mention American, but not Iranian, weapons. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" OK, so yes, you are playing down the slaughtering of innocent people caused by British and American weapons. What is wrong with people today? Is absolutely stomach churning. Funny, how you mention American, but not Iranian, weapons." No I mentioned British and American weapons. Being launched by Israel. It's quite simple. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" OK, so yes, you are playing down the slaughtering of innocent people caused by British and American weapons. What is wrong with people today? Is absolutely stomach churning. Funny, how you mention American, but not Iranian, weapons. No I mentioned British and American weapons. Being launched by Israel. It's quite simple." And what was that about people not knowing what antisemitism is? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" OK, so yes, you are playing down the slaughtering of innocent people caused by British and American weapons. What is wrong with people today? Is absolutely stomach churning. Funny, how you mention American, but not Iranian, weapons. No I mentioned British and American weapons. Being launched by Israel. It's quite simple. And what was that about people not knowing what antisemitism is?" I can see you're trying. People don't seem to know the difference between antisemitism and antizionism. Anything else??? You can use the Internet to educate yourself on these topics if you want too, but I fear you won't. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. your not seeing a genocide your seeing ethnic cleansing, if you were watching a genocide the Israelis would of had it all wrapoed up in the first year its not even close to a genocide Are you playing down the slaughtering of innocent people?nope just pointing out its ethnic cleansing not even close to a genocide are they being cunts yea without a doubt but when you keep calling it genocide you are just making the word worthless bit like wen peoole throw facist around all the time, if it was a genocide there would be a lot lot more people dead, personaly i think we should stay well out of it and let both sides off each other OK, so yes, you are playing down the slaughtering of innocent people caused by British and American weapons. What is wrong with people today? Is absolutely stomach churning. " not playing it down at all i said Israel are being cunts was just pointing out its not a genocide,like i said, i reackon we should let both sides go at it winner takes all, and whats wrong with people today nothings wrong with people today just the majority of us dont give a fuck about what israel and palestine do to wach other same way most people dont give a fuck what the russians and ukrainians do to each other what most peole have a problem with is wasting tax payers money on aid and weapons there shit show let them sort it out | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. your not seeing a genocide your seeing ethnic cleansing, if you were watching a genocide the Israelis would of had it all wrapoed up in the first year its not even close to a genocide Are you playing down the slaughtering of innocent people?nope just pointing out its ethnic cleansing not even close to a genocide are they being cunts yea without a doubt but when you keep calling it genocide you are just making the word worthless bit like wen peoole throw facist around all the time, if it was a genocide there would be a lot lot more people dead, personaly i think we should stay well out of it and let both sides off each other OK, so yes, you are playing down the slaughtering of innocent people caused by British and American weapons. What is wrong with people today? Is absolutely stomach churning. not playing it down at all i said Israel are being cunts was just pointing out its not a genocide,like i said, i reackon we should let both sides go at it winner takes all, and whats wrong with people today nothings wrong with people today just the majority of us dont give a fuck about what israel and palestine do to wach other same way most people dont give a fuck what the russians and ukrainians do to each other what most peole have a problem with is wasting tax payers money on aid and weapons there shit show let them sort it out" You would certainly give a fuck if you where living in fear of being blown to bits and shot by soldiers while you wait for aid to feed your staving kids! This thread has shown people's true colours. Sickening. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. your not seeing a genocide your seeing ethnic cleansing, if you were watching a genocide the Israelis would of had it all wrapoed up in the first year its not even close to a genocide Are you playing down the slaughtering of innocent people?nope just pointing out its ethnic cleansing not even close to a genocide are they being cunts yea without a doubt but when you keep calling it genocide you are just making the word worthless bit like wen peoole throw facist around all the time, if it was a genocide there would be a lot lot more people dead, personaly i think we should stay well out of it and let both sides off each other OK, so yes, you are playing down the slaughtering of innocent people caused by British and American weapons. What is wrong with people today? Is absolutely stomach churning. not playing it down at all i said Israel are being cunts was just pointing out its not a genocide,like i said, i reackon we should let both sides go at it winner takes all, and whats wrong with people today nothings wrong with people today just the majority of us dont give a fuck about what israel and palestine do to wach other same way most people dont give a fuck what the russians and ukrainians do to each other what most peole have a problem with is wasting tax payers money on aid and weapons there shit show let them sort it out You would certainly give a fuck if you where living in fear of being blown to bits and shot by soldiers while you wait for aid to feed your staving kids! This thread has shown people's true colours. Sickening. " It certainly does, the amount of sheep like do gooders on here talking Palastine because that's all they know. Meanwhile in the Sudan 30% more deaths in similar time period but silence from the virtue signallers. Why? No Jews involved. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. your not seeing a genocide your seeing ethnic cleansing, if you were watching a genocide the Israelis would of had it all wrapoed up in the first year its not even close to a genocide" In fairness, the UN have said it is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. your not seeing a genocide your seeing ethnic cleansing, if you were watching a genocide the Israelis would of had it all wrapoed up in the first year its not even close to a genocide Are you playing down the slaughtering of innocent people?nope just pointing out its ethnic cleansing not even close to a genocide are they being cunts yea without a doubt but when you keep calling it genocide you are just making the word worthless bit like wen peoole throw facist around all the time, if it was a genocide there would be a lot lot more people dead, personaly i think we should stay well out of it and let both sides off each other OK, so yes, you are playing down the slaughtering of innocent people caused by British and American weapons. What is wrong with people today? Is absolutely stomach churning. not playing it down at all i said Israel are being cunts was just pointing out its not a genocide,like i said, i reackon we should let both sides go at it winner takes all, and whats wrong with people today nothings wrong with people today just the majority of us dont give a fuck about what israel and palestine do to wach other same way most people dont give a fuck what the russians and ukrainians do to each other what most peole have a problem with is wasting tax payers money on aid and weapons there shit show let them sort it out You would certainly give a fuck if you where living in fear of being blown to bits and shot by soldiers while you wait for aid to feed your staving kids! This thread has shown people's true colours. Sickening. It certainly does, the amount of sheep like do gooders on here talking Palastine because that's all they know. Meanwhile in the Sudan 30% more deaths in similar time period but silence from the virtue signallers. Why? No Jews involved. " Because the western world is not involved in Sudan. You probably should have know that before posting such a silly comparison. Thanks for blocking me too. I've obviously upset you with the truth. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. your not seeing a genocide your seeing ethnic cleansing, if you were watching a genocide the Israelis would of had it all wrapoed up in the first year its not even close to a genocide Are you playing down the slaughtering of innocent people?nope just pointing out its ethnic cleansing not even close to a genocide are they being cunts yea without a doubt but when you keep calling it genocide you are just making the word worthless bit like wen peoole throw facist around all the time, if it was a genocide there would be a lot lot more people dead, personaly i think we should stay well out of it and let both sides off each other OK, so yes, you are playing down the slaughtering of innocent people caused by British and American weapons. What is wrong with people today? Is absolutely stomach churning. not playing it down at all i said Israel are being cunts was just pointing out its not a genocide,like i said, i reackon we should let both sides go at it winner takes all, and whats wrong with people today nothings wrong with people today just the majority of us dont give a fuck about what israel and palestine do to wach other same way most people dont give a fuck what the russians and ukrainians do to each other what most peole have a problem with is wasting tax payers money on aid and weapons there shit show let them sort it out You would certainly give a fuck if you where living in fear of being blown to bits and shot by soldiers while you wait for aid to feed your staving kids! This thread has shown people's true colours. Sickening. " i wouldnt be living in a country where my goverment decided to attack a much better armed neighbour, whats that saying ah yea dont take a knife to a gunfight,and as for this thread has shown peoples true coulours no its just shown you not everyone has the same thoughts as you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Melbourne rioters chant "Death to the IDF" at a pro-Palestinian really in Melbourne today. It looks like this thing is really taking off in Australia. It is quite remarkable the amount of people on this forum who couldn't see the cause and effect of a call to violence, I would imagine that is equatable to the general public. I never thought in a period of my life I would witness such antisemitism. I never thought in my lifetime I'd see genocide being covered up by America and Britain who fund the genocide. And never thought I'd see such evil in normal people supporting the genocide and even laughing at Palestine getting wiped out. Also didn't realise the number of people who dont know what antisemitism is. A sickening time to be alive. your not seeing a genocide your seeing ethnic cleansing, if you were watching a genocide the Israelis would of had it all wrapoed up in the first year its not even close to a genocide Are you playing down the slaughtering of innocent people?nope just pointing out its ethnic cleansing not even close to a genocide are they being cunts yea without a doubt but when you keep calling it genocide you are just making the word worthless bit like wen peoole throw facist around all the time, if it was a genocide there would be a lot lot more people dead, personaly i think we should stay well out of it and let both sides off each other OK, so yes, you are playing down the slaughtering of innocent people caused by British and American weapons. What is wrong with people today? Is absolutely stomach churning. not playing it down at all i said Israel are being cunts was just pointing out its not a genocide,like i said, i reackon we should let both sides go at it winner takes all, and whats wrong with people today nothings wrong with people today just the majority of us dont give a fuck about what israel and palestine do to wach other same way most people dont give a fuck what the russians and ukrainians do to each other what most peole have a problem with is wasting tax payers money on aid and weapons there shit show let them sort it out" When you say we should let both sides go at it. "Both sides" seem to be masss slaughtering innocent people. So for this to make sense, should we remove the innocent people first? Second question, should we allow them the same weaponry, like in a duel? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
