FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Quantum Theory & Death & multiverse theory

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Okay, not as morbid as the title sounds :') but just read a study that proves after death the consciousness lives on, just moves to another universe (parallel universe/multiverse).

Any sciencey buffs here? Would love your thoughts. ^_^

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

How did they prove it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What journal was the study published in?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•

there's no proof, but if every action also causes other possible actions to branch off an create other universes then yeah of course this is possible coz every time you die you also live...

one thing though. how many of these alternate universes are you personally aware of?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 15/02/17 23:29:59]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What journal was the study published in?"

I've heard quite a bit of hypothesizing about multiverse theories, but I've yet to see scientific proof. So knowing the title of the article with the study and the journal of publication would be helpful for a further analysis.

Although a lot of mutiverse science gets really mathematical, so it's a bit lost on me in that sense.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I believe anything is possible. They are always discovering new theories or planets or dinosaurs or historical coins that disprove history.

Erratic thoughts I know, but my point is they can't prove it either way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ysnomiaMan
over a year ago

Preston


"How did they prove it?"
a friend told me years ago that if you weigh people upon death they would lose a small yet measurable amout upon death, which (from einsteinian thinking that energy cannot be created or destroyed) must have gone somewhere assumptions can be made that there is a 'life force'.

But as with most things it's just an assumption, and even then using our best science or some spiritual notions...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How did they prove it? a friend told me years ago that if you weigh people upon death they would lose a small yet measurable amout upon death, which (from einsteinian thinking that energy cannot be created or destroyed) must have gone somewhere assumptions can be made that there is a 'life force'.

But as with most things it's just an assumption, and even then using our best science or some spiritual notions..."

I read that once too. Wondered if it was just the weight of air that escaped from their lungs. Also weird that the person was on some scales just as they died.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

Science may pose many theories and help produce lots of evidence but I think op that you may be mistaken about proof. But feel free to post links to reputable journals, so that ee can see what the literature reveals

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"Science may pose many theories and help produce lots of evidence but I think op that you may be mistaken about proof. But feel free to post links to reputable journals, so that ee can see what the literature reveals "

he can't post links that else he'll get a forum ban for spamming.

could mention the titles of the files and who wrote them though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"How did they prove it? a friend told me years ago that if you weigh people upon death they would lose a small yet measurable amout upon death, which (from einsteinian thinking that energy cannot be created or destroyed) must have gone somewhere assumptions can be made that there is a 'life force'.

But as with most things it's just an assumption, and even then using our best science or some spiritual notions...

I read that once too. Wondered if it was just the weight of air that escaped from their lungs. Also weird that the person was on some scales just as they died. "

See I thought that also, but air doesn't weigh as much as the study states. And this is also before the body started to deficate all waste so other than the air in the lungs. There is no other weight moved. Accourdingly to that study but it was like 1900 so it's skeptical of course

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ishopstippleMan
over a year ago

Purley

Lots of quarky brains on here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eus n EuropaCouple
over a year ago

Runcorn


"Okay, not as morbid as the title sounds :') but just read a study that proves after death the consciousness lives on, just moves to another universe (parallel universe/multiverse).

Any sciencey buffs here? Would love your thoughts. ^_^ "

I dont see a direct connection to Quantum Mechanics or am I missing somthing?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

It's actually a book called Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe

Which has these findings in, you can Get it on amazon.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•

well this is more boring and pointless than i ever imagined.

anyone fancy a fuck?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's actually a book called Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe

Which has these findings in, you can Get it on amazon. "

I'll take a look. But books aren't peer reviewed in the same way as academic journals, so I'm very sceptical.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"Okay, not as morbid as the title sounds :') but just read a study that proves after death the consciousness lives on, just moves to another universe (parallel universe/multiverse).

Any sciencey buffs here? Would love your thoughts. ^_^ "

Eff eff ess.

It's flim-flammery, mummery and thrusting poppycock and we'll all be long-dead before it happens.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

As Richard Dawkins said:

"Science: it works, bitches."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Energy cannot be destroyed, merely transformed. Newton.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"Energy cannot be destroyed, merely transformed. Newton. "

Yeah...?

So is that for or against the proposition, 'cos it can read both ways...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think we transform into something new. So for.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The weight of the human soul according to that study is 27g

It was the same amount in every single body.

When you look at religions from countries that wouldn't have been linked in many of them there is a sort of heaven, and other planes of existence so maybe the theory of a multiverse is possible and it has mearly been forgotten as a conscious belief

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"I think we transform into something new. So for."

Ok.

Well, sadly when you die you start losing your energy very fast, it dissipates into your surroundings/the universe and turns to heat... all energy turns to heat, as you say.

But your energy does not contain thoughts or feelings once you die.

The neurons die and the thoughts die.

People came up with all this garbage back in the 70 to prove there was life after death.

Once the heart stops you have about 4 minutes to get it pumping. or you will be brain dead. Once your brain dead you don’t come back.

I'm afraid.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"The weight of the human soul according to that study is 27g

It was the same amount in every single body.

When you look at religions from countries that wouldn't have been linked in many of them there is a sort of heaven, and other planes of existence so maybe the theory of a multiverse is possible and it has mearly been forgotten as a conscious belief "

Nahh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•

can someone define the soul for me as well, so i know what we're weighing?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"can someone define the soul for me as well, so i know what we're weighing?"

Prove to me there is a soul

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 16/02/17 00:19:27]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

there are lots of theories going around, by recognized scientists, even the 'matrix' type theory.

I think it would really take an advanced self aware being(a physical body is not really needed as such),to perhaps understand or see things we just cannot do as humans.

on another plane, lets say microscopic life...its doubtful they will ever see any further than their plane allows...it is the very same thing I believe for humankind(though it is probably really not that far away when humans will gain some capabilities as machines mentally and physiologically).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *razyhorse58Man
over a year ago

West Midlands

Read this theory a few weeks back,

"What if when we die the light at the end of the tunnel is the light to another hospital room, there we are born and the only reason you come out crying is because you remember everything from your past life and you’re crying at the fact that you died and lost everything, as you grow you start to forget your past life and focus on the life you have now, but patches of memory stay behind and that memory causes deja vu. Think ’bout that for a second.."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"can someone define the soul for me as well, so i know what we're weighing?

Prove to me there is a soul"

idk what one is yet, as nobody has defined it in physical terms.

got a feeling it's something we can explain neurologically.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Who says we need to stay the same? If I become energy, can I not be wind or sunlight or waves in tbe ocean? Must I retain my consciousness? No. Energy cannot be created or destroyed. It just IS.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Do not be afraid.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *razyhorse58Man
over a year ago

West Midlands

Aren't we just made up of atoms, that were once something else and in time become something different, eternal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"Who says we need to stay the same? If I become energy, can I not be wind or sunlight or waves in tbe ocean? Must I retain my consciousness? No. Energy cannot be created or destroyed. It just IS."

Yeah, energy, sure. We've established that.

But kinetic energy is not the same as saying there's 'life force' or a 'soul' or whatever it is that philosophers, doctors and psychiatrists have failed to find for hundreds of years.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Aren't we just made up of atoms, that were once something else and in time become something different, eternal "

Exactly!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"Aren't we just made up of atoms, that were once something else and in time become something different, eternal "

We ARE all made of star dust, which is cool

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *razyhorse58Man
over a year ago

West Midlands


"Aren't we just made up of atoms, that were once something else and in time become something different, eternal

We ARE all made of star dust, which is cool

"

Very cool

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ade_of_StarsCouple
over a year ago

Whitburn


"Aren't we just made up of atoms, that were once something else and in time become something different, eternal

We ARE all made of star dust, which is cool

"

"We are made of stardust harvesting starlight" is a quote i have on my wall

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ade_of_StarsCouple
over a year ago

Whitburn


"well this is more boring and pointless than i ever imagined.

anyone fancy a fuck?"

There is a universe where you're getting purposely fucked right now!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I very much doubt that the article PROVES the sole lives on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *razyhorse58Man
over a year ago

West Midlands


"well this is more boring and pointless than i ever imagined.

anyone fancy a fuck?

There is a universe where you're getting purposely fucked right now!"

Lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"well this is more boring and pointless than i ever imagined.

anyone fancy a fuck?

There is a universe where you're getting purposely fucked right now!

Lol"

There is no universe where I am getting fucked right now! OrJ would be there

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"well this is more boring and pointless than i ever imagined.

anyone fancy a fuck?

There is a universe where you're getting purposely fucked right now!"

and i have no knowledge of it and am not there personally to enjoy it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"Energy cannot be destroyed, merely transformed. Newton. "
.

So after you die you go on to boil my kettle! It's not exactly the pearly gates

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

To be honest,I think that thinking you know everything about science is as bad as not wanting to know anything about science.

I would not discount life after death, or an idea like eternal energy...

the universe could really be a big cyclic thing, rather than just a 'big bang'

While I am in no way religious,there can sometimes be some rather weird reasons why we even have value on rare materials like gold,diamonds etc...when in fact, these things have been important in improving modern technology...perhaps ancient ones werent as daft as we thought...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *razyhorse58Man
over a year ago

West Midlands


"Energy cannot be destroyed, merely transformed. Newton. .

So after you die you go on to boil my kettle! It's not exactly the pearly gates"

But something lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I wonder if animals , birds , insects and fish believe they may come back as humans ?

Gotta feel sorry for them if they do , life must be so much simpler without all the soul searching .....

I often think there must be some kind of life after death , otherwise what's the point ?

Then I figure that as I don't know for sure that there will be , it's best to cram as much into this life as possible .

So dream as if you'll live forever , live as if you'll die tomorrow comes to mind

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So there isa universe where we are all getting fucked. Not in a creepy, nasty or based-on-workissues way but in a good way. Why the fuck am I still here?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"I wonder if animals , birds , insects and fish believe they may come back as humans ?

Gotta feel sorry for them if they do , life must be so much simpler without all the soul searching .....

I often think there must be some kind of life after death , otherwise what's the point ?

Then I figure that as I don't know for sure that there will be , it's best to cram as much into this life as possible .

So dream as if you'll live forever , live as if you'll die tomorrow comes to mind "

The point of life IS death, so you are correct in the assertion to live it well while you can.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"I wonder if animals , birds , insects and fish believe they may come back as humans ?

Gotta feel sorry for them if they do , life must be so much simpler without all the soul searching .....

I often think there must be some kind of life after death , otherwise what's the point ?

Then I figure that as I don't know for sure that there will be , it's best to cram as much into this life as possible .

So dream as if you'll live forever , live as if you'll die tomorrow comes to mind

The point of life IS death, so you are correct in the assertion to live it well while you can.

"

i've already died inside so that's me sorted.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So, how does it happen?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"So, how does it happen?"

How does what happen?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wonder if animals , birds , insects and fish believe they may come back as humans ?

Gotta feel sorry for them if they do , life must be so much simpler without all the soul searching .....

I often think there must be some kind of life after death , otherwise what's the point ?

Oh no! Dont say that. There is always a point.

Someone loves you.

Life itself loves you. Energy persists.

Then I figure that as I don't know for sure that there will be , it's best to cram as much into this life as possible .

So dream as if you'll live forever , live as if you'll die tomorrow comes to mind

The point of life IS death, so you are correct in the assertion to live it well while you can.

i've already died inside so that's me sorted. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"I wonder if animals , birds , insects and fish believe they may come back as humans ?

Gotta feel sorry for them if they do , life must be so much simpler without all the soul searching .....

I often think there must be some kind of life after death , otherwise what's the point ?

Oh no! Dont say that. There is always a point.

Someone loves you.

Life itself loves you. Energy persists.

Then I figure that as I don't know for sure that there will be , it's best to cram as much into this life as possible .

So dream as if you'll live forever , live as if you'll die tomorrow comes to mind

The point of life IS death, so you are correct in the assertion to live it well while you can.

i've already died inside so that's me sorted. "

Sounds like a counsel of despair?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"I wonder if animals , birds , insects and fish believe they may come back as humans ?

Gotta feel sorry for them if they do , life must be so much simpler without all the soul searching .....

I often think there must be some kind of life after death , otherwise what's the point ?

Oh no! Dont say that. There is always a point.

Someone loves you.

Life itself loves you. Energy persists.

Then I figure that as I don't know for sure that there will be , it's best to cram as much into this life as possible .

So dream as if you'll live forever , live as if you'll die tomorrow comes to mind

The point of life IS death, so you are correct in the assertion to live it well while you can.

i've already died inside so that's me sorted.

Sounds like a counsel of despair? "

you have to die to kill off everything unreal about yourself. i think so anyway.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"i've already died inside so that's me sorted.

Sounds like a counsel of despair?

you have to die to kill off everything unreal about yourself. i think so anyway."

Very Zen

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Died inside?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wonder if animals , birds , insects and fish believe they may come back as humans ?

Gotta feel sorry for them if they do , life must be so much simpler without all the soul searching .....

I often think there must be some kind of life after death , otherwise what's the point ?

Then I figure that as I don't know for sure that there will be , it's best to cram as much into this life as possible .

So dream as if you'll live forever , live as if you'll die tomorrow comes to mind "

well most of them dont 'think' like we do...our sense of 'time' is what guides us...most animals are more of a react and behave accordingly to events. Thats why I hate fucking stories in papers about that 'evil' beast alligator or 'demon shark and so on...

projecting our own weaknesses onto the beings mostly incapable of thought processes like ourselves, always smacks of stupidity.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wonder if animals , birds , insects and fish believe they may come back as humans ?

Gotta feel sorry for them if they do , life must be so much simpler without all the soul searching .....

I often think there must be some kind of life after death , otherwise what's the point ?

Then I figure that as I don't know for sure that there will be , it's best to cram as much into this life as possible .

So dream as if you'll live forever , live as if you'll die tomorrow comes to mind

well most of them dont 'think' like we do...our sense of 'time' is what guides us...most animals are more of a react and behave accordingly to events. Thats why I hate fucking stories in papers about that 'evil' beast alligator or 'demon shark and so on...

projecting our own weaknesses onto the beings mostly incapable of thought processes like ourselves, always smacks of stupidity."

Very well put

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

Is this philosophy or physics?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wonder if animals , birds , insects and fish believe they may come back as humans ?

Gotta feel sorry for them if they do , life must be so much simpler without all the soul searching .....

I often think there must be some kind of life after death , otherwise what's the point ?

Then I figure that as I don't know for sure that there will be , it's best to cram as much into this life as possible .

So dream as if you'll live forever , live as if you'll die tomorrow comes to mind

well most of them dont 'think' like we do...our sense of 'time' is what guides us...most animals are more of a react and behave accordingly to events. Thats why I hate fucking stories in papers about that 'evil' beast alligator or 'demon shark and so on...

projecting our own weaknesses onto the beings mostly incapable of thought processes like ourselves, always smacks of stupidity."

Animals are not human. Making them appear so is pointless.

They live in the world in ways that we cannot comorehend. Despite that we do attempt to understand.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"To be honest,I think that thinking you know everything about science is as bad as not wanting to know anything about science.

I would not discount life after death, or an idea like eternal energy...

the universe could really be a big cyclic thing, rather than just a 'big bang'

While I am in no way religious,there can sometimes be some rather weird reasons why we even have value on rare materials like gold,diamonds etc...when in fact, these things have been important in improving modern technology...perhaps ancient ones werent as daft as we thought..."

.

There no more important than silver or hydrogen or helium, where would we be without argon or uranium or oxygen, were all atoms? So what atoms don't last forever, everything decays, it's the only natural order, to decay and die.

Now rebirth is another story, do we hold some memory created by a biological organism called a brain, Sadly I very much doubt it!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Is this philosophy or physics?

"

both have been combined...from the very idea of the anthropic principle joe..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"Is this philosophy or physics?

both have been combined...from the very idea of the anthropic principle joe.. "

Fuckin' hippies

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"I wonder if animals , birds , insects and fish believe they may come back as humans ?

Gotta feel sorry for them if they do , life must be so much simpler without all the soul searching .....

I often think there must be some kind of life after death , otherwise what's the point ?

Then I figure that as I don't know for sure that there will be , it's best to cram as much into this life as possible .

So dream as if you'll live forever , live as if you'll die tomorrow comes to mind

well most of them dont 'think' like we do...our sense of 'time' is what guides us...most animals are more of a react and behave accordingly to events. Thats why I hate fucking stories in papers about that 'evil' beast alligator or 'demon shark and so on...

projecting our own weaknesses onto the beings mostly incapable of thought processes like ourselves, always smacks of stupidity."

.

Ten minutes ago you said you were open minded now you know for certain that animals (err that's humans) don't think like "we" do?.

Any evidence for that hypothesis or is that just you instilling your own beliefs of what you think you'd like to be true

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Fucking hippies? Lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"To be honest,I think that thinking you know everything about science is as bad as not wanting to know anything about science.

I would not discount life after death, or an idea like eternal energy...

the universe could really be a big cyclic thing, rather than just a 'big bang'

While I am in no way religious,there can sometimes be some rather weird reasons why we even have value on rare materials like gold,diamonds etc...when in fact, these things have been important in improving modern technology...perhaps ancient ones werent as daft as we thought....

There no more important than silver or hydrogen or helium, where would we be without argon or uranium or oxygen, were all atoms? So what atoms don't last forever, everything decays, it's the only natural order, to decay and die.

Now rebirth is another story, do we hold some memory created by a biological organism called a brain, Sadly I very much doubt it!"

diamonds and lasers:

https://phys.org/news/2013-08-diamonds-laser-scientist-friend.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/01/03/e6s-diamond-sculptors-push-envelope-lasers-quantum-realm/

nahhh useless arent they?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•

so what's the soul exactly? i got a feeling it's made up of electrical impulses, that our brains (and DNA possibly) stores these experiences and that makes us who we are.

how's that gonna live on once our body stops firing neuron connections and chemicals and shit?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'll be dead therefore wont care as long as beasties aren't eating me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ed wineMan
over a year ago

Where the streets have no name

Joining Quantum Theory & Death & multiverse theory is just launching philosophical speculations (at the moment...).

However, there are serious currents of research in Near-Death Experiences and Global Consciousness (noosphere), both with astonishing evidences.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wonder if animals , birds , insects and fish believe they may come back as humans ?

Gotta feel sorry for them if they do , life must be so much simpler without all the soul searching .....

I often think there must be some kind of life after death , otherwise what's the point ?

Then I figure that as I don't know for sure that there will be , it's best to cram as much into this life as possible .

So dream as if you'll live forever , live as if you'll die tomorrow comes to mind

well most of them dont 'think' like we do...our sense of 'time' is what guides us...most animals are more of a react and behave accordingly to events. Thats why I hate fucking stories in papers about that 'evil' beast alligator or 'demon shark and so on...

projecting our own weaknesses onto the beings mostly incapable of thought processes like ourselves, always smacks of stupidity..

Ten minutes ago you said you were open minded now you know for certain that animals (err that's humans) don't think like "we" do?.

Any evidence for that hypothesis or is that just you instilling your own beliefs of what you think you'd like to be true"

You think I dont know that humans are animals?...did I say ALL animals? nope...not at all.Of course...we could point out that there aren't that many species that have carried out feats of amazement or destruction.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"To be honest,I think that thinking you know everything about science is as bad as not wanting to know anything about science.

I would not discount life after death, or an idea like eternal energy...

the universe could really be a big cyclic thing, rather than just a 'big bang'

While I am in no way religious,there can sometimes be some rather weird reasons why we even have value on rare materials like gold,diamonds etc...when in fact, these things have been important in improving modern technology...perhaps ancient ones werent as daft as we thought....

There no more important than silver or hydrogen or helium, where would we be without argon or uranium or oxygen, were all atoms? So what atoms don't last forever, everything decays, it's the only natural order, to decay and die.

Now rebirth is another story, do we hold some memory created by a biological organism called a brain, Sadly I very much doubt it!

diamonds and lasers:

https://phys.org/news/2013-08-diamonds-laser-scientist-friend.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/01/03/e6s-diamond-sculptors-push-envelope-lasers-quantum-realm/

nahhh useless arent they?"

.

No more important than carbon!.

My personal thoughts is that modern day life has created and moulded us in a way of thought structure that makes us say diamonds amazing, carbon errr oh.

Oh wait diamonds are carbon, silly me, in fact all the elements are made from hydrogen and helium anyhow, born from stars and decaying down the ladder of death, were no different than sharks or alligators, in fact the five main elements in your body are the same five elements in the universe, what is in essence in you is in me and in sharks and alligators and the universe, were all one.

The only difference I perceive is humans have the ability to contemplate our momentarily existence in this oneness, to imagine were something special and separate is stupidity

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"

You think I dont know that humans are animals?...did I say ALL animals? nope...not at all.Of course...we could point out that there aren't that many species that have carried out feats of amazement or destruction."

.

That's exactly my point about modem day thought structures!.

Why in your mind does a "feat of amazement" or "destruction" mean anything better?, you've clearly been conditioned by life to believe that?.

In reality nobody or nothing else gives a right royal shit about your feats of amazement, your just another brick in the wall only one with a superiority complex

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"To be honest,I think that thinking you know everything about science is as bad as not wanting to know anything about science.

I would not discount life after death, or an idea like eternal energy...

the universe could really be a big cyclic thing, rather than just a 'big bang'

While I am in no way religious,there can sometimes be some rather weird reasons why we even have value on rare materials like gold,diamonds etc...when in fact, these things have been important in improving modern technology...perhaps ancient ones werent as daft as we thought....

There no more important than silver or hydrogen or helium, where would we be without argon or uranium or oxygen, were all atoms? So what atoms don't last forever, everything decays, it's the only natural order, to decay and die.

Now rebirth is another story, do we hold some memory created by a biological organism called a brain, Sadly I very much doubt it!

diamonds and lasers:

https://phys.org/news/2013-08-diamonds-laser-scientist-friend.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/01/03/e6s-diamond-sculptors-push-envelope-lasers-quantum-realm/

nahhh useless arent they?.

No more important than carbon!.

My personal thoughts is that modern day life has created and moulded us in a way of thought structure that makes us say diamonds amazing, carbon errr oh.

Oh wait diamonds are carbon, silly me, in fact all the elements are made from hydrogen and helium anyhow, born from stars and decaying down the ladder of death, were no different than sharks or alligators, in fact the five main elements in your body are the same five elements in the universe, what is in essence in you is in me and in sharks and alligators and the universe, were all one.

The only difference I perceive is humans have the ability to contemplate our momentarily existence in this oneness, to imagine were something special and separate is stupidity"

despite the elements etc..

I've already pointed out further above that I think humans will no longer be humans in the future,biotech and further on into AI will undoubtedly make us a bit 'special'.So I disagree it is stupidity that we are not special on this earth anyway for now..it might be for some of the wrong reasons..but I have hope.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's actually a book called Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe

Which has these findings in, you can Get it on amazon.

I'll take a look. But books aren't peer reviewed in the same way as academic journals, so I'm very sceptical."

Is it published by the a Church of Scientology?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•

sources for the book might have been peer reviewed?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

You think I dont know that humans are animals?...did I say ALL animals? nope...not at all.Of course...we could point out that there aren't that many species that have carried out feats of amazement or destruction..

That's exactly my point about modem day thought structures!.

Why in your mind does a "feat of amazement" or "destruction" mean anything better?, you've clearly been conditioned by life to believe that?.

In reality nobody or nothing else gives a right royal shit about your feats of amazement, your just another brick in the wall only one with a superiority complex"

why are you being so aggressive?-I dont think this is the first time you have not centered on me...and you clearly have been here.

superiority complex?..I adore the natural world, as a lover of all nature and photographer of nature..I'm at my happiest within it.

you can think what you like, I dont really care...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"To be honest,I think that thinking you know everything about science is as bad as not wanting to know anything about science.

I would not discount life after death, or an idea like eternal energy...

the universe could really be a big cyclic thing, rather than just a 'big bang'

While I am in no way religious,there can sometimes be some rather weird reasons why we even have value on rare materials like gold,diamonds etc...when in fact, these things have been important in improving modern technology...perhaps ancient ones werent as daft as we thought....

There no more important than silver or hydrogen or helium, where would we be without argon or uranium or oxygen, were all atoms? So what atoms don't last forever, everything decays, it's the only natural order, to decay and die.

Now rebirth is another story, do we hold some memory created by a biological organism called a brain, Sadly I very much doubt it!

diamonds and lasers:

https://phys.org/news/2013-08-diamonds-laser-scientist-friend.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/01/03/e6s-diamond-sculptors-push-envelope-lasers-quantum-realm/

nahhh useless arent they?.

No more important than carbon!.

My personal thoughts is that modern day life has created and moulded us in a way of thought structure that makes us say diamonds amazing, carbon errr oh.

Oh wait diamonds are carbon, silly me, in fact all the elements are made from hydrogen and helium anyhow, born from stars and decaying down the ladder of death, were no different than sharks or alligators, in fact the five main elements in your body are the same five elements in the universe, what is in essence in you is in me and in sharks and alligators and the universe, were all one.

The only difference I perceive is humans have the ability to contemplate our momentarily existence in this oneness, to imagine were something special and separate is stupidity

despite the elements etc..

I've already pointed out further above that I think humans will no longer be humans in the future,biotech and further on into AI will undoubtedly make us a bit 'special'.So I disagree it is stupidity that we are not special on this earth anyway for now..it might be for some of the wrong reasons..but I have hope."

.

Hope is a terrible thing, it brings nothing but despair, no other creature on this earth gives a shit about "our" feats of achievement.

The only truism I know is to fear death but not to live your life afraid of dying.

If anyone figures out how to do that feel free to message me the answer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"

You think I dont know that humans are animals?...did I say ALL animals? nope...not at all.Of course...we could point out that there aren't that many species that have carried out feats of amazement or destruction..

That's exactly my point about modem day thought structures!.

Why in your mind does a "feat of amazement" or "destruction" mean anything better?, you've clearly been conditioned by life to believe that?.

In reality nobody or nothing else gives a right royal shit about your feats of amazement, your just another brick in the wall only one with a superiority complex

why are you being so aggressive?-I dont think this is the first time you have not centered on me...and you clearly have been here.

superiority complex?..I adore the natural world, as a lover of all nature and photographer of nature..I'm at my happiest within it.

you can think what you like, I dont really care..."

.

I didn't know we were taking about you?. And why are you concerned what a stranger on a website thinks of you?.

Are we really so self obsessed that everything's about us? .

Goodnight

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's actually a book called Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe

Which has these findings in, you can Get it on amazon.

I'll take a look. But books aren't peer reviewed in the same way as academic journals, so I'm very sceptical.

Is it published by the a Church of Scientology?"

That will be about making money for them then.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ola cubesMan
over a year ago

coatbridge


"To be honest,I think that thinking you know everything about science is as bad as not wanting to know anything about science.

I would not discount life after death, or an idea like eternal energy...

the universe could really be a big cyclic thing, rather than just a 'big bang'

While I am in no way religious,there can sometimes be some rather weird reasons why we even have value on rare materials like gold,diamonds etc...when in fact, these things have been important in improving modern technology...perhaps ancient ones werent as daft as we thought....

There no more important than silver or hydrogen or helium, where would we be without argon or uranium or oxygen, were all atoms? So what atoms don't last forever, everything decays, it's the only natural order, to decay and die.

Now rebirth is another story, do we hold some memory created by a biological organism called a brain, Sadly I very much doubt it!

diamonds and lasers:

https://phys.org/news/2013-08-diamonds-laser-scientist-friend.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/01/03/e6s-diamond-sculptors-push-envelope-lasers-quantum-realm/

nahhh useless arent they?.

No more important than carbon!.

My personal thoughts is that modern day life has created and moulded us in a way of thought structure that makes us say diamonds amazing, carbon errr oh.

Oh wait diamonds are carbon, silly me, in fact all the elements are made from hydrogen and helium anyhow, born from stars and decaying down the ladder of death, were no different than sharks or alligators, in fact the five main elements in your body are the same five elements in the universe, what is in essence in you is in me and in sharks and alligators and the universe, were all one.

The only difference I perceive is humans have the ability to contemplate our momentarily existence in this oneness, to imagine were something special and separate is stupidity

despite the elements etc..

I've already pointed out further above that I think humans will no longer be humans in the future,biotech and further on into AI will undoubtedly make us a bit 'special'.So I disagree it is stupidity that we are not special on this earth anyway for now..it might be for some of the wrong reasons..but I have hope..

Hope is a terrible thing, it brings nothing but despair, no other creature on this earth gives a shit about "our" feats of achievement.

The only truism I know is to fear death but not to live your life afraid of dying.

If anyone figures out how to do that feel free to message me the answer"

the one certainty in life is death so why fear it.

if you accept it you live well thats my theory.

we as people are consumed with conditioning you must be clothed..... use bits of paper or metal for food we are at odds with nature so the problems we have are own creations.

As for an afterlife yeah or nay I will find out when I get there thats enough

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've been here before......numerous times, how do I know? I just do.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not necessarily on fab lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscentTonyMan
over a year ago

Kent


"Okay, not as morbid as the title sounds :') but just read a study that proves after death the consciousness lives on, just moves to another universe (parallel universe/multiverse).

Any sciencey buffs here? Would love your thoughts. ^_^ "

Burt Reynolds

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's quite strange that the last fart of every corpse weighed is about an ounce, but yeah I will buy it.

Got into string and membrain theory for a while, could only read what others had done, so it kind of moved out of my focus.

But there is some discussion in there of other dimensions we can't see, I was particularly fond of diagrams of 7 dimensions represented on paper in 2 dimensions... kind of cool.

As for after life etc. nah not buying you got today, and if you are lucky tomorrow you will have today as well.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 16/02/17 02:18:26]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I quite like this film.. Einstein's God Model

Its based on string and membrain theory

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How did they prove it?"
I'm sure you thought about this question before you typed it?...well science still can't prove what a thought actually is ...does that mean you didn't think it ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"How did they prove it?

I'm sure you thought about this question before you typed it?...well science still can't prove what a thought actually is ...does that mean you didn't think it ?"

maybe.

what if someone else is controlling my thoughts?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•

quantum science where anything is possible, so long as you can make an equation.

so, who is controlling our thoughts? i've seen the matrix, do you think that's air your breathing now?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfJoc4wcDAE

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eryCuriousCouple2012Couple
over a year ago

Funville

[Removed by poster at 16/02/17 12:14:01]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eryCuriousCouple2012Couple
over a year ago

Funville

Regarding the weight loss after death, there is something interesting in Snopes, if you look for soul weight

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Okay, not as morbid as the title sounds :') but just read a study that proves after death the consciousness lives on, just moves to another universe (parallel universe/multiverse).

Any sciencey buffs here? Would love your thoughts. ^_^ "

I'd love to be proven wrong but I think it's balderdash ......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eryCuriousCouple2012Couple
over a year ago

Funville


"Okay, not as morbid as the title sounds :') but just read a study that proves after death the consciousness lives on, just moves to another universe (parallel universe/multiverse).

Any sciencey buffs here? Would love your thoughts. ^_^

I'd love to be proven wrong but I think it's balderdash ...... "

I agree, it's pretty simple to me...there's no such thing as magic. It would be great if our consciousness could carry on after death but I just don't see it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I tire at the impertinence of any science founded on none-binary facts.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"I tire at the impertinence of any science founded on none-binary facts.....

"

"We have alternate science facts, OK?!"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I tire at the impertinence of any science founded on none-binary facts.....

"We have alternate science facts, OK?!""

Wot you mean like fake facts?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Quantum mechanics. A case of too many grease monkeys spoil the service?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester

What perplexes me is this notion that this all exists because or for us, because we're intelligent, because we're human?.

It strikes me as the height of superiority, why not for this lovely early butterfly that I'm currently watching, why is not all created for it and we're merely the observers.

It seems to always come back to this main argument that we're intelligent but then we abandon reason, logic and intelligence to just make shit up when discussing our own demise?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What perplexes me is this notion that this all exists because or for us, because we're intelligent, because we're human?.

It strikes me as the height of superiority, why not for this lovely early butterfly that I'm currently watching, why is not all created for it and we're merely the observers.

It seems to always come back to this main argument that we're intelligent but then we abandon reason, logic and intelligence to just make shit up when discussing our own demise?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *100Man
over a year ago

Essex

Omg that's a bit serious you made me loose my mojo.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We live,we die,we live again

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No interest in pseudoscience and guesswork.

I have a funny feeling that the 'proof' in the book is far from proof at all

I'm also excellent at presenting convincing logical arguments but it doesn't mean I'm presenting the truth, just the version of the truth I want you to believe in so that I get my own way

Ruby

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Read the snopes account, only 1 out 6 lost 21 grams, measured inaccurately on crude scales, dissapointing I thought the weight of a fart had been measured... more work needed in this important area.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Okay, not as morbid as the title sounds :') but just read a study that proves after death the consciousness lives on, just moves to another universe (parallel universe/multiverse).

Any sciencey buffs here? Would love your thoughts. ^_^ "

Do men get meets in other universe's

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Okay, not as morbid as the title sounds :') but just read a study that proves after death the consciousness lives on, just moves to another universe (parallel universe/multiverse).

Any sciencey buffs here? Would love your thoughts. ^_^

Do men get meets in other universe's "

No.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igbikercMan
over a year ago

Southport

Have you seen the studies that have been done on DMT.

Apparently lots of people experience the same effect and it sounds like an after death experience. Very interesting approach

Have a read http://littleatoms.com/science/psychedelic-drug-could-explain-our-belief-life-after-death

But we all know the earth is flat right? It's water thats up there, and beyond the artic other lands lay haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eus n EuropaCouple
over a year ago

Runcorn


"What perplexes me is this notion that this all exists because or for us, because we're intelligent, because we're human?.

It strikes me as the height of superiority, why not for this lovely early butterfly that I'm currently watching, why is not all created for it and we're merely the observers.

It seems to always come back to this main argument that we're intelligent but then we abandon reason, logic and intelligence to just make shit up when discussing our own demise?"

Can anyone define Intelligence? Cos I forone have never met anyone who can

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Errm, suck and fuck

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"Can anyone define Intelligence? Cos I forone have never met anyone who can "

Yes, viz.;

The ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills, surely?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence

(cut n' paste being a prime example )

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Can anyone define Intelligence? Cos I forone have never met anyone who can

Yes, viz.;

The ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills, surely?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence

(cut n' paste being a prime example )"

The ability to think logically/to reason is more the root meaning to me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!""

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )"

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless. "

I have no reason to think a soul exists

I think we could illustrate far more data illustrating nothing that could be defined as a soul leaves or enters the body or brain

Science when understood does work

It claims to know nothing it is merely a method employed to ensure data that can be used logically is as robust as practically possible at the time , done correctly it will acknowledge what it does not or cannot know and it's assumptions. Just because the daily mail can't report science and just because some dishonest people call themselves scientists does not affect what science actually is

I am unaware of a Dawkins strawman argument , perhaps share one ?

I am aware of many strawman style arguments against the scientific method and those of us who understand it and respect what it can achieve xx

The 21 grams con is old and nonsense

The brain dies all that survives of the person are memes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•

say there was a soul, and the point in living was to obtain one via physical experiences within the universe. what would be the point in losing that body eventually?

really do feel this stuff i made up to stop people being scared of dying. when you won't even be aware of it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch


"say there was a soul, and the point in living was to obtain one via physical experiences within the universe. what would be the point in losing that body eventually?

really do feel this stuff i made up to stop people being scared of dying. when you won't even be aware of it.

"

In fact turning that on its head slightly , if a number of stories regarding the actives and capabilities of so called ghosts were to be believed why would any one want to be inhibited by an earthly body ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"say there was a soul, and the point in living was to obtain one via physical experiences within the universe. what would be the point in losing that body eventually?

really do feel this stuff i made up to stop people being scared of dying. when you won't even be aware of it.

In fact turning that on its head slightly , if a number of stories regarding the actives and capabilities of so called ghosts were to be believed why would any one want to be inhibited by an earthly body ? "

too physically experience things, including chemicals.

but yeah would be better to be a ghost, floating around and being creepy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless. "

.If a scientist???

He's one of the world's most eminent evolutionary biologists!.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I'm disappointed that this has originated from a book, rather than some good high quality published research etc. Ok, maybe that is what may have inspired the book, there's just no sign of it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester

I can feel,nay sense, some alternative facts coming soon

#areyoutheresidney

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"I can feel,nay sense, some alternative facts coming soon

#areyoutheresidney "

Good thing we're not dealing with the Trump administration - he's just included an Education Secretary who thinks creationism should be allowed to be taught in class.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I can feel,nay sense, some alternative facts coming soon

#areyoutheresidney

Good thing we're not dealing with the Trump administration - he's just included an Education Secretary who thinks creationism should be allowed to be taught in class. "

You... you mean to say that there is another explanation than an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent entity that made everyone and everything?!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"I can feel,nay sense, some alternative facts coming soon

#areyoutheresidney

Good thing we're not dealing with the Trump administration - he's just included an Education Secretary who thinks creationism should be allowed to be taught in class.

You... you mean to say that there is another explanation than an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent entity that made everyone and everything?!! "

Here you go...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_Evidence_Museum

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless. .If a scientist???

He's one of the world's most eminent evolutionary biologists!.

"

Don't give a damn - he has too strong a bias in his personal opinion for my liking.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"I can feel,nay sense, some alternative facts coming soon

#areyoutheresidney

Good thing we're not dealing with the Trump administration - he's just included an Education Secretary who thinks creationism should be allowed to be taught in class. "

.

Delusional behaviour, from a human, well I never

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I can feel,nay sense, some alternative facts coming soon

#areyoutheresidney

Good thing we're not dealing with the Trump administration - he's just included an Education Secretary who thinks creationism should be allowed to be taught in class.

You... you mean to say that there is another explanation than an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent entity that made everyone and everything?!!

Here you go...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_Evidence_Museum"

The things you know Joe

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless. .If a scientist???

He's one of the world's most eminent evolutionary biologists!.

Don't give a damn - he has too strong a bias in his personal opinion for my liking."

.

He doesn't have to be likable to be right, facts don't care about your feelings, I know, life's a bitch!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unandbuckCouple
over a year ago

Sheffield

Multiverse is a theory. By accepting it you can say anything happens in the other ones, because there is an infinite number of them, so all possibilities can and do happen.

You can't argue against it and it can't be proven either.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"I can feel,nay sense, some alternative facts coming soon

#areyoutheresidney

Good thing we're not dealing with the Trump administration - he's just included an Education Secretary who thinks creationism should be allowed to be taught in class.

You... you mean to say that there is another explanation than an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent entity that made everyone and everything?!!

Here you go...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_Evidence_Museum

The things you know Joe"

That shit is crazy - they have displays with early humans wandering the earth with dinosaurs (that all got wiped out in the Flood).

Couldn't make this shit up... oh, wait a mo'...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless.

I have no reason to think a soul exists

I think we could illustrate far more data illustrating nothing that could be defined as a soul leaves or enters the body or brain

Science when understood does work

It claims to know nothing it is merely a method employed to ensure data that can be used logically is as robust as practically possible at the time , done correctly it will acknowledge what it does not or cannot know and it's assumptions. Just because the daily mail can't report science and just because some dishonest people call themselves scientists does not affect what science actually is

I am unaware of a Dawkins strawman argument , perhaps share one ?

?"

Someone called Michael Ruse apparently said "The God Delusion makes me ashamed to be an atheist.....Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion would fail any introductory philosophy or religion course. Proudly he criticizes that whereof he knows nothing."

There would be many, many false arguments he makes like 'All Christians believe the world is only 4,000 years old' or 'Religion teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.' or 'Everyone has the same religion as their parents'....it's just all venomous, pompous bullshit and that is NOT science, I have no respect for such a man!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I can feel,nay sense, some alternative facts coming soon

#areyoutheresidney

Good thing we're not dealing with the Trump administration - he's just included an Education Secretary who thinks creationism should be allowed to be taught in class.

You... you mean to say that there is another explanation than an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent entity that made everyone and everything?!!

Here you go...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_Evidence_Museum

The things you know Joe

That shit is crazy - they have displays with early humans wandering the earth with dinosaurs (that all got wiped out in the Flood).

Couldn't make this shit up... oh, wait a mo'...

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless. .If a scientist???

He's one of the world's most eminent evolutionary biologists!.

Don't give a damn - he has too strong a bias in his personal opinion for my liking..

He doesn't have to be likable to be right, facts don't care about your feelings, I know, life's a bitch!"

I have no comment on his work, but his opinionated personal bigotry makes him a man of low value in my eyes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

Oh and the spirit is not physical, so why would it be subject to a physical death?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"Oh and the spirit is not physical, so why would it be subject to a physical death? "

Prove. It.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Oh and the spirit is not physical, so why would it be subject to a physical death?

Prove. It.

"

I have no need to, lol! When the student is ready the teacher will appear....

If you want to know, you could ask a horse.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless.

I have no reason to think a soul exists

I think we could illustrate far more data illustrating nothing that could be defined as a soul leaves or enters the body or brain

Science when understood does work

It claims to know nothing it is merely a method employed to ensure data that can be used logically is as robust as practically possible at the time , done correctly it will acknowledge what it does not or cannot know and it's assumptions. Just because the daily mail can't report science and just because some dishonest people call themselves scientists does not affect what science actually is

I am unaware of a Dawkins strawman argument , perhaps share one ?

?

Someone called Michael Ruse apparently said "The God Delusion makes me ashamed to be an atheist.....Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion would fail any introductory philosophy or religion course. Proudly he criticizes that whereof he knows nothing."

There would be many, many false arguments he makes like 'All Christians believe the world is only 4,000 years old' or 'Religion teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.' or 'Everyone has the same religion as their parents'....it's just all venomous, pompous bullshit and that is NOT science, I have no respect for such a man!

"

A person calling themselves atheist criticising Dawkins does not a straw man him make

However you show yourself to be a straw woman

He does NOT say all Christians are flat earthers but he does lament that some Christians want to teach this

He does not say ALL people follow the religion of their parents yet he does make an astute observation regarding the strength of the correlation across the world

He does suggest that religion blunts the need or desire to probe our origins , with this I'd say he is correct

In this case we refer to a religion meaning it's followers belive a creator exists, other religions exist but as this is the GOD delusion and the only thing God believers seem to agree about their delusion is they believe it created everything (if not it is not a God concept only a powerful alien )

Thus by default the believer already knows what the origins of everything is thus is not inspired to look beyond x that's fair logic not a straw man

And yes I talk to horses every morning

And

"Oh and the spirit is not physical, so why would it be subject to a physical death? "

It isn't the second a brain is smushed a none detectable force is beamed from Saturn to neutralise all that was ever the essence of spirit and that of course proves your theory on spirit totally wrong

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

The multi dimensional multi verse is a model created by mathematicians to satisfy outcomes of quantum physics equations... and as for god .. we created him in our image

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

And when I die .. I'll be dead .. that is all ..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


"I think we transform into something new. So for."

Yeah, soil.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless.

I have no reason to think a soul exists

I think we could illustrate far more data illustrating nothing that could be defined as a soul leaves or enters the body or brain

Science when understood does work

It claims to know nothing it is merely a method employed to ensure data that can be used logically is as robust as practically possible at the time , done correctly it will acknowledge what it does not or cannot know and it's assumptions. Just because the daily mail can't report science and just because some dishonest people call themselves scientists does not affect what science actually is

I am unaware of a Dawkins strawman argument , perhaps share one ?

?

Someone called Michael Ruse apparently said "The God Delusion makes me ashamed to be an atheist.....Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion would fail any introductory philosophy or religion course. Proudly he criticizes that whereof he knows nothing."

There would be many, many false arguments he makes like 'All Christians believe the world is only 4,000 years old' or 'Religion teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.' or 'Everyone has the same religion as their parents'....it's just all venomous, pompous bullshit and that is NOT science, I have no respect for such a man!

"

You haven't read it, have you?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"

A person calling themselves atheist criticising Dawkins does not a straw man him make

However you show yourself to be a straw woman

He does NOT say all Christians are flat earthers but he does lament that some Christians want to teach this

He does not say ALL people follow the religion of their parents yet he does make an astute observation regarding the strength of the correlation across the world

He does suggest that religion blunts the need or desire to probe our origins , with this I'd say he is correct

In this case we refer to a religion meaning it's followers belive a creator exists, other religions exist but as this is the GOD delusion and the only thing God believers seem to agree about their delusion is they believe it created everything (if not it is not a God concept only a powerful alien )

Thus by default the believer already knows what the origins of everything is thus is not inspired to look beyond x that's fair logic not a straw man

And yes I talk to horses every morning

"

But do you connect with their spirits?

Two of the Dawkins generalisations were direct quotes, the third I heard him say myself. Regardless - he makes many erroneous claims about what other people believe in order to belittle them, but in doing so merely belittles himself.

You are incorrect in your assumptions, like Dawkins - you need to check the facts!!

Believers do not cease to question, on the contrary, many of those I know excitedly study modern science to find out more about HOW the universe was created and functions - when science and spirituality work together with truly open minds they can fill in the blanks for each other.

But of course if you prefer Dawkins ignorance and dogma then fill your boots

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Haven't read all the previous posts - too many, can't be arsed

I believed in reincarnation & that's why you don't remember your first few years as your sole is trying to find the perfect shell to fit in to ..Just my beliefs x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless.

I have no reason to think a soul exists

I think we could illustrate far more data illustrating nothing that could be defined as a soul leaves or enters the body or brain

Science when understood does work

It claims to know nothing it is merely a method employed to ensure data that can be used logically is as robust as practically possible at the time , done correctly it will acknowledge what it does not or cannot know and it's assumptions. Just because the daily mail can't report science and just because some dishonest people call themselves scientists does not affect what science actually is

I am unaware of a Dawkins strawman argument , perhaps share one ?

?

Someone called Michael Ruse apparently said "The God Delusion makes me ashamed to be an atheist.....Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion would fail any introductory philosophy or religion course. Proudly he criticizes that whereof he knows nothing."

There would be many, many false arguments he makes like 'All Christians believe the world is only 4,000 years old' or 'Religion teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.' or 'Everyone has the same religion as their parents'....it's just all venomous, pompous bullshit and that is NOT science, I have no respect for such a man!

You haven't read it, have you? "

I have heard him speak, that was more than enough to see how dogmatic and ignorant he is on the subject of spirituality. I see no conflict between science and the spiritual. My background was scientific and atheistic, I was just open minded enough to ignore the dogma and go find some evidence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless.

I have no reason to think a soul exists

I think we could illustrate far more data illustrating nothing that could be defined as a soul leaves or enters the body or brain

Science when understood does work

It claims to know nothing it is merely a method employed to ensure data that can be used logically is as robust as practically possible at the time , done correctly it will acknowledge what it does not or cannot know and it's assumptions. Just because the daily mail can't report science and just because some dishonest people call themselves scientists does not affect what science actually is

I am unaware of a Dawkins strawman argument , perhaps share one ?

?

Someone called Michael Ruse apparently said "The God Delusion makes me ashamed to be an atheist.....Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion would fail any introductory philosophy or religion course. Proudly he criticizes that whereof he knows nothing."

There would be many, many false arguments he makes like 'All Christians believe the world is only 4,000 years old' or 'Religion teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.' or 'Everyone has the same religion as their parents'....it's just all venomous, pompous bullshit and that is NOT science, I have no respect for such a man!

You haven't read it, have you?

I have heard him speak, that was more than enough to see how dogmatic and ignorant he is on the subject of spirituality. I see no conflict between science and the spiritual. My background was scientific and atheistic, I was just open minded enough to ignore the dogma and go find some evidence. "

Dawkins is anti-dogma, that's kind of the point.

If you are going to comment on a book, perhaps try reading it first.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless.

I have no reason to think a soul exists

I think we could illustrate far more data illustrating nothing that could be defined as a soul leaves or enters the body or brain

Science when understood does work

It claims to know nothing it is merely a method employed to ensure data that can be used logically is as robust as practically possible at the time , done correctly it will acknowledge what it does not or cannot know and it's assumptions. Just because the daily mail can't report science and just because some dishonest people call themselves scientists does not affect what science actually is

I am unaware of a Dawkins strawman argument , perhaps share one ?

?

Someone called Michael Ruse apparently said "The God Delusion makes me ashamed to be an atheist.....Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion would fail any introductory philosophy or religion course. Proudly he criticizes that whereof he knows nothing."

There would be many, many false arguments he makes like 'All Christians believe the world is only 4,000 years old' or 'Religion teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.' or 'Everyone has the same religion as their parents'....it's just all venomous, pompous bullshit and that is NOT science, I have no respect for such a man!

You haven't read it, have you?

I have heard him speak, that was more than enough to see how dogmatic and ignorant he is on the subject of spirituality. I see no conflict between science and the spiritual. My background was scientific and atheistic, I was just open minded enough to ignore the dogma and go find some evidence.

Dawkins is anti-dogma, that's kind of the point.

If you are going to comment on a book, perhaps try reading it first. "

I'm not commenting on a book - I'm commenting on the ignorance and bias I have heard and seen from the author of it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obin_and_marionMan
over a year ago

Beaconsfield


"How did they prove it?"

The multiverse theory is a well established theory - but its unprovable.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless.

I have no reason to think a soul exists

I think we could illustrate far more data illustrating nothing that could be defined as a soul leaves or enters the body or brain

Science when understood does work

It claims to know nothing it is merely a method employed to ensure data that can be used logically is as robust as practically possible at the time , done correctly it will acknowledge what it does not or cannot know and it's assumptions. Just because the daily mail can't report science and just because some dishonest people call themselves scientists does not affect what science actually is

I am unaware of a Dawkins strawman argument , perhaps share one ?

?

Someone called Michael Ruse apparently said "The God Delusion makes me ashamed to be an atheist.....Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion would fail any introductory philosophy or religion course. Proudly he criticizes that whereof he knows nothing."

There would be many, many false arguments he makes like 'All Christians believe the world is only 4,000 years old' or 'Religion teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.' or 'Everyone has the same religion as their parents'....it's just all venomous, pompous bullshit and that is NOT science, I have no respect for such a man!

You haven't read it, have you?

I have heard him speak, that was more than enough to see how dogmatic and ignorant he is on the subject of spirituality. I see no conflict between science and the spiritual. My background was scientific and atheistic, I was just open minded enough to ignore the dogma and go find some evidence.

Dawkins is anti-dogma, that's kind of the point.

If you are going to comment on a book, perhaps try reading it first.

I'm not commenting on a book - I'm commenting on the ignorance and bias I have heard and seen from the author of it. "

By admitting your own in not actually having read anything by Dawkins? Interesting tactic.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"As Prof. Richard Dawkins said:

"Science; it works, bitches!"

Except when it doesn't you obnoxious, arrogant man.....(Dawkins, not you )

He is a very rude man.

Was listening to R4 one mooring and there was the Right Reverend Bishop of Somewhere giving a worthy if dull explanation of why we should let the love of Jesus into our hearts.

He was followed by Dawkins, who curtly put him down with;

"Well, I don;t see why we should listen to the bishop just because he has an imaginary friend!"

He pisses me off because he deliberately erects fallacious straw dogs, and if a scientist is dishonest, he is worthless.

I have no reason to think a soul exists

I think we could illustrate far more data illustrating nothing that could be defined as a soul leaves or enters the body or brain

Science when understood does work

It claims to know nothing it is merely a method employed to ensure data that can be used logically is as robust as practically possible at the time , done correctly it will acknowledge what it does not or cannot know and it's assumptions. Just because the daily mail can't report science and just because some dishonest people call themselves scientists does not affect what science actually is

I am unaware of a Dawkins strawman argument , perhaps share one ?

?

Someone called Michael Ruse apparently said "The God Delusion makes me ashamed to be an atheist.....Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion would fail any introductory philosophy or religion course. Proudly he criticizes that whereof he knows nothing."

There would be many, many false arguments he makes like 'All Christians believe the world is only 4,000 years old' or 'Religion teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.' or 'Everyone has the same religion as their parents'....it's just all venomous, pompous bullshit and that is NOT science, I have no respect for such a man!

You haven't read it, have you?

I have heard him speak, that was more than enough to see how dogmatic and ignorant he is on the subject of spirituality. I see no conflict between science and the spiritual. My background was scientific and atheistic, I was just open minded enough to ignore the dogma and go find some evidence.

Dawkins is anti-dogma, that's kind of the point.

If you are going to comment on a book, perhaps try reading it first.

I'm not commenting on a book - I'm commenting on the ignorance and bias I have heard and seen from the author of it.

By admitting your own in not actually having read anything by Dawkins? Interesting tactic. "

I don't have to have knowledge of a book I have no interest in discussing lol! What I have seen of the man in recorded interviews is enough to demonstrate conclusively he creates straw dogs - if he does it in full knowledge of the truth that makes him even more of a deceiver, so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt in suggesting he is merely ignorant.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

These posts are getting very long...

What was the question?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnaronMan
over a year ago

london

The first person to mention entanglement gets a free fuck.

Oh gosh, that's me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"These posts are getting very long...

What was the question?

"

Think this one was FAMF "Fancy A Mind Fuck"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *razyhorse58Man
over a year ago

West Midlands

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How did they prove it?"

They filmed it on an iPhone 6 using a multiverse filter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"Multiverse is a theory. By accepting it you can say anything happens in the other ones, because there is an infinite number of them, so all possibilities can and do happen.

You can't argue against it and it can't be proven either."

.

It's a hypothesis not a theory, there completely different things

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *et-shortyMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"I can feel,nay sense, some alternative facts coming soon

#areyoutheresidney "

.

See I told you some alternative facts were coming.

I'm a deviner of truth from the lord all mighty.

No the reality is I can rest assured that so me di ck will just spout any old nonsense as truths or just say, no I'm not saying it's true I'm just saying it's possible!, yeah it's possible I'll get three shags off here tonight, just not likely

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"To be honest,I think that thinking you know everything about science is as bad as not wanting to know anything about science.

I would not discount life after death, or an idea like eternal energy...

the universe could really be a big cyclic thing, rather than just a 'big bang'

While I am in no way religious,there can sometimes be some rather weird reasons why we even have value on rare materials like gold,diamonds etc...when in fact, these things have been important in improving modern technology...perhaps ancient ones werent as daft as we thought....

There no more important than silver or hydrogen or helium, where would we be without argon or uranium or oxygen, were all atoms? So what atoms don't last forever, everything decays, it's the only natural order, to decay and die.

Now rebirth is another story, do we hold some memory created by a biological organism called a brain, Sadly I very much doubt it!

diamonds and lasers:

https://phys.org/news/2013-08-diamonds-laser-scientist-friend.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/01/03/e6s-diamond-sculptors-push-envelope-lasers-quantum-realm/

nahhh useless arent they?.

No more important than carbon!.

My personal thoughts is that modern day life has created and moulded us in a way of thought structure that makes us say diamonds amazing, carbon errr oh.

Oh wait diamonds are carbon, silly me, in fact all the elements are made from hydrogen and helium anyhow, born from stars and decaying down the ladder of death, were no different than sharks or alligators, in fact the five main elements in your body are the same five elements in the universe, what is in essence in you is in me and in sharks and alligators and the universe, were all one.

The only difference I perceive is humans have the ability to contemplate our momentarily existence in this oneness, to imagine were something special and separate is stupidity

despite the elements etc..

I've already pointed out further above that I think humans will no longer be humans in the future,biotech and further on into AI will undoubtedly make us a bit 'special'.So I disagree it is stupidity that we are not special on this earth anyway for now..it might be for some of the wrong reasons..but I have hope..

Hope is a terrible thing, it brings nothing but despair, no other creature on this earth gives a shit about "our" feats of achievement.

The only truism I know is to fear death but not to live your life afraid of dying.

If anyone figures out how to do that feel free to message me the answer"

Be the change you want to see in the world......either that or be a dog.....they don't care about all that shit,and they can lick their own balls!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top