FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Should a penalty of been given?

Jump to newest
 

By *otoriouslyaddictive OP   Man
10 hours ago

here

I don’t think it should’ve been a pen (England fan) Congo we’re lucky to get away with it however Kane went begging for it. What a game though. Roll on Sunday

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hippy 1Man
10 hours ago

high Wycombe

Just Kane being Kane , been doing it all of his career .No pen .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dstefiMan
10 hours ago

Solihull

Did it stop a goal opportunity? No, he was never anywhere near catching up with the ball and what contact there was (amplified by Kane's Oscar-worthy dive) could easily be construed as accidental, and rightly was by VAR.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otoriouslyaddictive OP   Man
10 hours ago

here

Agree with both. Then he scores an absolute screamer 😂

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oul_Man-MedwayMan
10 hours ago

Rainham / Gillingham

I wouldn't have given it, but a bit surprised it wasn't given the soft penalties we see nowadays.

I think they need to look at who initiates the contact.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eekaboo BellyMan
10 hours ago

Bradford

England were desperate to equalise. Like Congo getting a bit dirty after Harry's second goal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hippy 1Man
10 hours ago

high Wycombe


"Agree with both. Then he scores an absolute screamer 😂"

Without him we’d be on the plane ( football not coming home )

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ou only live onceMan
10 hours ago

London

No, it was the right call. Would have been livid if that was given against England.

Would I have complained if given to us? Also no. Have seen soft penalties, where the attacker "wins" then, given before and we will again.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *kphooey43Man
10 hours ago

Barnet

Kane should have been booked for diving.

I was almost cheering for DCR because it's the hope that kills us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wcoMan
10 hours ago

West Midlands

Part-time football fans, eh?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dstefiMan
10 hours ago

Solihull


"Kane should have been booked for diving.

I was almost cheering for DCR because it's the hope that kills us. "

They were pretty good, played a good go-forward attack and didn't just kill the game with defence. We got very lucky, their keeper was a hero several times in that game. Two killer finishes does not make a great team performance and we still have serious work to do to progress.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockwellinMan
10 hours ago

Over there...

England were shit, they play like that against Mexico they're done.

Whats with the pointless passing the ball back and forth the width of field when you're 1 goal behind. DR Congo played to win, they were constantly attacking, and up until Englan scored their dedense was solid.

As for the OP question...no, it wasnt a penalty. Replays showed that, they also showed Kane dived - should have been yellow carded.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackandsashaCouple
9 hours ago

West Dublin

Never a penalty, not even close. Super performance from Kane but I think he has become known now for dragging his foot to con referees.

And as the ref clearly called a dive , and was backed by VAR, how the hell was he not booked ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ydaz70Man
9 hours ago

Rotherham /newquay

In the english game definitely wouldn't have been given but just surprised it wasn't given here looking at whats been given before but a win is a win.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oeBeansMan
9 hours ago

Derby

I think it was a penalty but I can see why it wasn't overturned on the count of it not being a clear and obvious error

You do see it all the time where the striker gets there first and even if they're not going anywhere, if the keeper makes contact, then it's always a pen.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
9 hours ago

in Lancashire

Im glad it wasn't given, the practise of players going past the goalie then hanging a foot to con refs needs addressing at all levels

..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erdyHollyTV/TS
9 hours ago

In a galaxy far far away

[Removed by poster at 01/07/26 21:29:05]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ou only live onceMan
9 hours ago

London


"Im glad it wasn't given, the practise of players going past the goalie then hanging a foot to con refs needs addressing at all levels

.."

That's also true. But must be a real skill in trying to running while trying to keep your feet behind you at the same time! 🤣

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erdyHollyTV/TS
9 hours ago

In a galaxy far far away

It's a strange one.

One camera angle from in front was clear cut.

One camera angle from behind says no.

I guess the VAR guys based it on the latter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
9 hours ago

in Lancashire


"Im glad it wasn't given, the practise of players going past the goalie then hanging a foot to con refs needs addressing at all levels

..

That's also true. But must be a real skill in trying to running while trying to keep your feet behind you at the same time! 🤣"

They're told to go down if there's contact but sometimes you think he could have gone over the keeper there or around them if they weren't looking to hang their leg in ..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emptme1993Man
9 hours ago

manchester

Not a penalty for me at all, Kane initiated the contact and it was such an unnatural movement of his foot into him and rather a theatrical fall

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eekaboo BellyMan
8 hours ago

Bradford

Anyway... Football!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erdyHollyTV/TS
8 hours ago

In a galaxy far far away

Wtf is happening in here 🤣

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ew2buryMan
8 hours ago

Forums.

Also, whole my first reaction was cast iron, I agree with no pen. Although it would be worth looking at the defender's contact.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ister_EMan
6 hours ago

Hayling Island

Not a penalty.I was mildly surprised that it wasn't given though, considering some of the soft penalties handed during this tournament.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mf123Man
6 hours ago

with one foot out the door

Dont care only game in my life iv not cheered englands goal cos i was fuming at the effort skill teamwork and standard of this group i was fucking raging with these prissy millionairs the need a fan in the dressing room afyer the game to shame this shit out of em fuck tactics get some damn pride of fuck off

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
6 hours ago

Bedfuck

I'd give Kane an 8 points for the dive, 9 for degree of difficulty, 2 for style.

Minimum of splash when he entered the grass. He kept his feet together on lift off but body had too much bend.

Ref should have given a penalty because England needed a helping hand.

They were dying on their feet after the first goal. They were packing their bags.

Tucel did the right changes invigorated the the dying monster like Dr Frankenstien. Kane became the head of the monster that came back to life.

Sadly I think Mexico could be end of the road. A tequila sunset.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *aptain Caveman41Man
6 hours ago

Home


"I don’t think it should’ve been a pen (England fan) Congo we’re lucky to get away with it however Kane went begging for it. What a game though. Roll on Sunday "
it was a blatant dive he should have gotten a yellow

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top