FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Bonnie Blue

Jump to newest
 

By *xx2025 OP   Man
2 days ago

Watford

Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night .

So would you or did you ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inchestersBitchWoman
2 days ago

land of overweight munters

The question is did you ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *xx2025 OP   Man
2 days ago

Watford


"The question is did you ?"

Haha ,Definitely not ,but it did raise the thought in my head .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otlovefun42Couple
2 days ago

Costa Blanca Spain...


"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night .

So would you or did you ?

"

Yes I watched it as well.

Did I? No.

Would I? She probably wouldn't want an old fart like me anywhere near, but given the chance. Why not?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ealitybitesMan
2 days ago

Belfast

No I didn't and wouldn't watch the documentary.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inchestersBitchWoman
2 days ago

land of overweight munters


"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night .

So would you or did you ?

Yes I watched it as well.

Did I? No.

Would I? She probably wouldn't want an old fart like me anywhere near, but given the chance. Why not?"

Your not old. But she would because she said she wants to fuck any man, on their 18th birthday upwards

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
2 days ago

couple, us we him her.

Obviously people are going to say about why does she do it, risk's and so on.

But it's probably a lot safe than say for example:

Someone who chooses to climb a cliff face without safety ropes.

People swimming in the sea with sharks without a safety cage.

People who climb to the top of extremely tall buildings and hang off the top......

There's literally dozens of examples .

No-one forced anyone to have sex with her and she did it of her own free choice and probably enjoyed it.

Would I?

Probably not,given that I'd prefer it to have meaning a f enjoyment for the person, rather than "just another cock"

Besides I'm rather small I very much doubt it would be noticed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obynsissyglaTV/TS
2 days ago

Glasgow

She’s living the dream!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otlovefun42Couple
2 days ago

Costa Blanca Spain...


"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night .

So would you or did you ?

Yes I watched it as well.

Did I? No.

Would I? She probably wouldn't want an old fart like me anywhere near, but given the chance. Why not?

Your not old. But she would because she said she wants to fuck any man, on their 18th birthday upwards"

You've just made an old farts day. Mwah.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obbi_sutherlandTV/TS
2 days ago

Dornoch

Her body, her choice.

Whether we agree with her choices or not, as long as she is doing it of her own free will.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eavenscentitCouple
2 days ago

barnstaple

I haven't watched it but, will. I believe if she could make that money in a different way she would. It'll be interesting to see how she feels in 20 years time about the men involved.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
2 days ago

Leeds

At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emorefridaCouple
2 days ago

La la land

Generally I would say what she does is her own business. However, not entirely sure that targeting Freshers week students (I e. Boys who've just left home) and film them in exchange for free sex, to earn herself money is morally right.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agic.MMan
2 days ago

Orpington


"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process."

Unless we believe that having sex with barely legal teens on camera for monetary gain, is wrong and potentially harmful for them...at least the teenage girls she now has sex with as well, because the teenage boys...meh, who cares about them...hooray for double standards in our society 👀. Ok I'm being slightly overly sarcastic...sorry I haven't had breakfast yet 😳

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emorefridaCouple
2 days ago

La la land


"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process.

Unless we believe that having sex with barely legal teens on camera for monetary gain, is wrong and potentially harmful for them...at least the teenage girls she now has sex with as well, because the teenage boys...meh, who cares about them...hooray for double standards in our society 👀. Ok I'm being slightly overly sarcastic...sorry I haven't had breakfast yet 😳"

Nah I agree with you, if Bonnie was a bloke targeting female Freshers there would be a lot more objections. Double standards piss me off big time. One minute we say boys mature slower than girls yet with regards to sex they magically are more so. Make it make sense or at least be consistent.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
2 days ago

Leeds


"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process.

Unless we believe that having sex with barely legal teens on camera for monetary gain, is wrong and potentially harmful for them...at least the teenage girls she now has sex with as well, because the teenage boys...meh, who cares about them...hooray for double standards in our society 👀. Ok I'm being slightly overly sarcastic...sorry I haven't had breakfast yet 😳"

Believe it or not these guys and girls who do go with her can say no.

Personally what she does is something I wouldn't do but I'm sure my opinion or anyone else's has no bearing on her whatsoever.

I find it quite sad that young women/men feel the need to do this kind of thing for 5 mins of fame.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weetiepie99Woman
2 days ago

cardiff

Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
2 days ago

Leeds


"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm "

Should the moral compass not be on those fathers/sons....they make the decision to get their dick wet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inchestersBitchWoman
2 days ago

land of overweight munters


"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm "

I said on my thread the attitude is wives aren't good enough, and don't get me started on the disabled comment she said out loud

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weetiepie99Woman
2 days ago

cardiff


"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm

Should the moral compass not be on those fathers/sons....they make the decision to get their dick wet."

Yes, them too, but it is her couldn't give a fuck attitude about anyone/anything, or the people she is hurting in her quest for money and fame

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
2 days ago

Leeds


"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm

Should the moral compass not be on those fathers/sons....they make the decision to get their dick wet.

Yes, them too, but it is her couldn't give a fuck attitude about anyone/anything, or the people she is hurting in her quest for money and fame"

Sadly she isn't the first and definitely won't be the last person to do this and I fear it will only get worse. I do wish young women/men had more respect for themselves.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estructionDollyWoman
2 days ago

The Deep Dark Woods


"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm "

I agree with some of this, I think she is exploiting very young men and women who may live to regret their actions when they grow a bit older. They have little life experience and the person you are at 19/20 is very different from the person you are at 35 etc.

But the very grown, adult men know exactly what they are doing and are making informed, consenting decisions to cheat on their wives. She isn't manipulating them into anything. The responsibility for their "hurt" caused to their partners is on them.

I may not like her attitude or her shock tactics to make money, but adult men have their own agency and can make their own decisions on whether to cheat on their partners. That's on them, not her.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Sundance Kid XMan
2 days ago

Tamworth

Not my type at all

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weetiepie99Woman
2 days ago

cardiff


"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm

I agree with some of this, I think she is exploiting very young men and women who may live to regret their actions when they grow a bit older. They have little life experience and the person you are at 19/20 is very different from the person you are at 35 etc.

But the very grown, adult men know exactly what they are doing and are making informed, consenting decisions to cheat on their wives. She isn't manipulating them into anything. The responsibility for their "hurt" caused to their partners is on them.

I may not like her attitude or her shock tactics to make money, but adult men have their own agency and can make their own decisions on whether to cheat on their partners. That's on them, not her. "

Yes, I also agree with you to a certain extent. But as I have always said on any threads on here about cheating, I blame the 'enabler' equally, ie having sex with someone who you know is married or has a partner, even if you are single, is just as bad as the person cheating, in my eyes anyway

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
2 days ago

Leeds


"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm

I agree with some of this, I think she is exploiting very young men and women who may live to regret their actions when they grow a bit older. They have little life experience and the person you are at 19/20 is very different from the person you are at 35 etc.

But the very grown, adult men know exactly what they are doing and are making informed, consenting decisions to cheat on their wives. She isn't manipulating them into anything. The responsibility for their "hurt" caused to their partners is on them.

I may not like her attitude or her shock tactics to make money, but adult men have their own agency and can make their own decisions on whether to cheat on their partners. That's on them, not her.

Yes, I also agree with you to a certain extent. But as I have always said on any threads on here about cheating, I blame the 'enabler' equally, ie having sex with someone who you know is married or has a partner, even if you are single, is just as bad as the person cheating, in my eyes anyway"

The blame lies squarely at the "cheaters" feet. They are the ones who entered a committed relationship but this is now going of topic....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodmessMan
2 days ago

yumsville

People are talking about teen's this and virgins that, freshers and innocent people. I've just googled her and she's only just turned 26 so not exactly some dyed in the wool (DiCaprio) super siren.

She was probably around their age (through covid?) when she and many started going online to make cash out of guys stuck at home. It so happens she's made her numbers up fairly quick? lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodmessMan
2 days ago

yumsville

* I did start writing that 1/2 hr ago!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weetiepie99Woman
2 days ago

cardiff


"Yea, she is hurting people though...the father and son she had sex with...I wonder how the wife mother feels about that?...and then there's the wives who 'should do better' and their husbands wouldn't stray. Oh and the young teens, boys and girls she did a scene with, who had never been on camera, some were virgins...but she thought that was 'much better' for the scene as their nerves were genuine. No, not doing anyone any harm

I agree with some of this, I think she is exploiting very young men and women who may live to regret their actions when they grow a bit older. They have little life experience and the person you are at 19/20 is very different from the person you are at 35 etc.

But the very grown, adult men know exactly what they are doing and are making informed, consenting decisions to cheat on their wives. She isn't manipulating them into anything. The responsibility for their "hurt" caused to their partners is on them.

I may not like her attitude or her shock tactics to make money, but adult men have their own agency and can make their own decisions on whether to cheat on their partners. That's on them, not her.

Yes, I also agree with you to a certain extent. But as I have always said on any threads on here about cheating, I blame the 'enabler' equally, ie having sex with someone who you know is married or has a partner, even if you are single, is just as bad as the person cheating, in my eyes anyway

The blame lies squarely at the "cheaters" feet. They are the ones who entered a committed relationship but this is now going of topic.... "

Yes we are going off topic. We'll just have to agree to disagree on that one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
2 days ago

Ayrshire

I think we, as a society, have to accept some responsibility for creating and enabling this. Specifically more so, men and their thirst regarding porn and how certain platforms almost enable them to direct their own scenario. It grows from there

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
2 days ago

Leeds


"I think we, as a society, have to accept some responsibility for creating and enabling this. Specifically more so, men and their thirst regarding porn and how certain platforms almost enable them to direct their own scenario. It grows from there "

Well said 👏

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ortheastFarmerMan
2 days ago

Newcastle

Not being funny but if I had the face and body for subscription based websites.... well put it this way I wouldnt be up to my knees in cow poo right now 😂

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estructionDollyWoman
2 days ago

The Deep Dark Woods


"Not being funny but if I had the face and body for subscription based websites.... well put it this way I wouldnt be up to my knees in cow poo right now 😂"

Oh, me too. I don't even pretend otherwise 😂 I'm not a prude when it comes to porn either, as long as it's ethical and nobody is being exploited. There's nothing wrong with sex work imo, and sex work is work.

I do find her marketing tactics distasteful imo, the purposefully inflammatory things she says to get views etc. It's made her plenty of money though, and I respect the grift.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
2 days ago

Leeds


"Not being funny but if I had the face and body for subscription based websites.... well put it this way I wouldnt be up to my knees in cow poo right now 😂

Oh, me too. I don't even pretend otherwise 😂 I'm not a prude when it comes to porn either, as long as it's ethical and nobody is being exploited. There's nothing wrong with sex work imo, and sex work is work.

I do find her marketing tactics distasteful imo, the purposefully inflammatory things she says to get views etc. It's made her plenty of money though, and I respect the grift. "

Sex will always sell...oldest profession in the book.

Unfortunately content is just going to get more controversial as time goes on until these sites start banning people

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
2 days ago

Central

A review I saw said it wasn't a particularly revelatory documentary, with the interviewer not asking probing questions etc. I've not seen it and wish her well, with consenting adults

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aughtyPeepzMan
2 days ago

London

I yet to watch it. She's always in the limelight so it'll an interesting watch

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
2 days ago

couple, us we him her.

But at 18 they are allowed to go to war, fight and potentially die for their country,but apparently not mature enough to decide who they are allowed to have sex with!!!!

What age is considered responsible??

Look I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with what she did and as has already been pointed out of this was a guy people's heads would be exploding with anger.

I'm merely pointing out legally she's done nothing wrong.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ortheastFarmerMan
2 days ago

Newcastle


"Not being funny but if I had the face and body for subscription based websites.... well put it this way I wouldnt be up to my knees in cow poo right now 😂

Oh, me too. I don't even pretend otherwise 😂 I'm not a prude when it comes to porn either, as long as it's ethical and nobody is being exploited. There's nothing wrong with sex work imo, and sex work is work.

I do find her marketing tactics distasteful imo, the purposefully inflammatory things she says to get views etc. It's made her plenty of money though, and I respect the grift.

Sex will always sell...oldest profession in the book.

Unfortunately content is just going to get more controversial as time goes on until these sites start banning people "

I must admit the marketing of it is the part that can annoy me at times, slightly off topic, but being an ex trucker who used to have a truck at the shows, there was a few advertising the fact they done OF while half hanging out their tops taking pics with teenage kids. Like handing a onlyfans sticker to a 15 year old is excessive ,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agic.MMan
2 days ago

Orpington


"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process.

Unless we believe that having sex with barely legal teens on camera for monetary gain, is wrong and potentially harmful for them...at least the teenage girls she now has sex with as well, because the teenage boys...meh, who cares about them...hooray for double standards in our society 👀. Ok I'm being slightly overly sarcastic...sorry I haven't had breakfast yet 😳

Believe it or not these guys and girls who do go with her can say no.

Personally what she does is something I wouldn't do but I'm sure my opinion or anyone else's has no bearing on her whatsoever.

I find it quite sad that young women/men feel the need to do this kind of thing for 5 mins of fame."

I don't believe a brain of an 18 year old is as logical as the brain of a 30/40/50 year old...that's why it's so easy for someone like Andrew Tate to say to a young girl "come be my girlfriend and do cam work you'll be rich and famous " ...a grown woman would easily say no to that, a barely 18 year old will be much more naive...same when Bonnie tells an 18 year old boy "come have sex with me on camera, you'll have the best sex of your life and become tik tok famous". I also don't understand it when people say " I wouldn't do the things she is doing, because it doesn't seem right, but I don't care if she does, because it's not illegal" - It's such a morally ambiguous argument.

When ever the topic of Bonnie Blue appears, there is a handful of women that always make excuses for her behaviour, which is strange as they would be the first to call out a man that does it. My argument is that when it comes to using barely legal teens for monetary gains and fame, both Andrew Tate and Bonnie Blue are guilty of that...they are two sides of the same coin - and that coin is a huge problem in our society

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
2 days ago

Who is Bonnie Blue ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agic.MMan
2 days ago

Orpington


"Who is Bonnie Blue ?"

That girl over there 👉...on the Internet

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
2 days ago

Leeds


"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process.

Unless we believe that having sex with barely legal teens on camera for monetary gain, is wrong and potentially harmful for them...at least the teenage girls she now has sex with as well, because the teenage boys...meh, who cares about them...hooray for double standards in our society 👀. Ok I'm being slightly overly sarcastic...sorry I haven't had breakfast yet 😳

Believe it or not these guys and girls who do go with her can say no.

Personally what she does is something I wouldn't do but I'm sure my opinion or anyone else's has no bearing on her whatsoever.

I find it quite sad that young women/men feel the need to do this kind of thing for 5 mins of fame.

I don't believe a brain of an 18 year old is as logical as the brain of a 30/40/50 year old...that's why it's so easy for someone like Andrew Tate to say to a young girl "come be my girlfriend and do cam work you'll be rich and famous " ...a grown woman would easily say no to that, a barely 18 year old will be much more naive...same when Bonnie tells an 18 year old boy "come have sex with me on camera, you'll have the best sex of your life and become tik tok famous". I also don't understand it when people say " I wouldn't do the things she is doing, because it doesn't seem right, but I don't care if she does, because it's not illegal" - It's such a morally ambiguous argument.

When ever the topic of Bonnie Blue appears, there is a handful of women that always make excuses for her behaviour, which is strange as they would be the first to call out a man that does it. My argument is that when it comes to using barely legal teens for monetary gains and fame, both Andrew Tate and Bonnie Blue are guilty of that...they are two sides of the same coin - and that coin is a huge problem in our society "

I'm certainly not making excuses for her, I don't advocate what she does in the slightest.

From what you said....do you think it's right for barely legal teens to be on here?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emorefridaCouple
2 days ago

La la land


"But at 18 they are allowed to go to war, fight and potentially die for their country,but apparently not mature enough to decide who they are allowed to have sex with!!!!

What age is considered responsible??

Look I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with what she did and as has already been pointed out of this was a guy people's heads would be exploding with anger.

I'm merely pointing out legally she's done nothing wrong."

Legally no, but she's targeting Freshers. Which to me is preditory behaviour. These are 18/19 year old freshly moved away from home. Who are trying to impress their new friends, exposed to peer pressure and add to that copious amount of drink. Freshers weeks are a train wreck. Do I think it's ok for 18 year olds to do this yes if they want, do I think targeting Freshers week students is morally wrong absolutely.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agic.MMan
2 days ago

Orpington


"At the end of the day, she isn't hurting anyone and making quite a bit of money in the process.

Unless we believe that having sex with barely legal teens on camera for monetary gain, is wrong and potentially harmful for them...at least the teenage girls she now has sex with as well, because the teenage boys...meh, who cares about them...hooray for double standards in our society 👀. Ok I'm being slightly overly sarcastic...sorry I haven't had breakfast yet 😳

Believe it or not these guys and girls who do go with her can say no.

Personally what she does is something I wouldn't do but I'm sure my opinion or anyone else's has no bearing on her whatsoever.

I find it quite sad that young women/men feel the need to do this kind of thing for 5 mins of fame.

I don't believe a brain of an 18 year old is as logical as the brain of a 30/40/50 year old...that's why it's so easy for someone like Andrew Tate to say to a young girl "come be my girlfriend and do cam work you'll be rich and famous " ...a grown woman would easily say no to that, a barely 18 year old will be much more naive...same when Bonnie tells an 18 year old boy "come have sex with me on camera, you'll have the best sex of your life and become tik tok famous". I also don't understand it when people say " I wouldn't do the things she is doing, because it doesn't seem right, but I don't care if she does, because it's not illegal" - It's such a morally ambiguous argument.

When ever the topic of Bonnie Blue appears, there is a handful of women that always make excuses for her behaviour, which is strange as they would be the first to call out a man that does it. My argument is that when it comes to using barely legal teens for monetary gains and fame, both Andrew Tate and Bonnie Blue are guilty of that...they are two sides of the same coin - and that coin is a huge problem in our society

I'm certainly not making excuses for her, I don't advocate what she does in the slightest.

From what you said....do you think it's right for barely legal teens to be on here?"

I don't think anyone under 21 should be here...hell I think the legal age (of anything including voting) should be pushed to at least 21...but I am a bit of a "radical" when it comes to age - and truly believe the human brain develops and matures fully in the mid 20s. I still see people in their early 20s and late teens as kids really, regardless of their achievements in life to that point...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erkshire8299Man
2 days ago

slough


"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night .

So would you or did you ?

Yes I watched it as well.

Did I? No.

Would I? She probably wouldn't want an old fart like me anywhere near, but given the chance. Why not?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uttercupWoman
2 days ago

Borders

I would😈

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ookingtolickMan
2 days ago

london

I’m not really keen on her personally but have watched a couple of her films on porn hub..both were challenging wanks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pentoall555Man
2 days ago

benfleet

Agree with you there

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfull pairingCouple
2 days ago

Bristol

I would... but I’d be wearing so many condoms I doubt I’d feel much

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *reachersdaughterWoman
2 days ago

Someplace

People on here always judging this woman but have no smoke for the men who queue up for her. It's giving misogyny. Why is it her fault that these men cheat on their wives? If it wasn't her it'd be someone else. 🙄

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ife NinjaMan
2 days ago

Dunfermline

She has a plan. She makes plenty of money. She's not for me. Good luck to her if that's what she wants to do. It's her body 🤓

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weetiepie99Woman
2 days ago

cardiff


"People on here always judging this woman but have no smoke for the men who queue up for her. It's giving misogyny. Why is it her fault that these men cheat on their wives? If it wasn't her it'd be someone else. 🙄"

The thread is about her, not anyone else. I have just as much distaste for the men that cheat as I have for her. Just because it may be 'someone else', doesn't make it ok. Just because it's 'her body', doesn't make it ok when she's targeting 'barely legal' teens or virgins, and saying the wives or partners are asking for it, or should do better!! I despair

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ingh89Man
2 days ago

Birmingham

Not seen it yet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *xx2025 OP   Man
2 days ago

Watford


"People on here always judging this woman but have no smoke for the men who queue up for her. It's giving misogyny. Why is it her fault that these men cheat on their wives? If it wasn't her it'd be someone else. 🙄

The thread is about her, not anyone else. I have just as much distaste for the men that cheat as I have for her. Just because it may be 'someone else', doesn't make it ok. Just because it's 'her body', doesn't make it ok when she's targeting 'barely legal' teens or virgins, and saying the wives or partners are asking for it, or should do better!! I despair "

Yes, there is a bigger conversation but this is a flippant post , I wasn’t trying to character assassinate the girl or psychoanalyse her or the participants (there’s enough material there for a convention).

it’s her life and definitely has her head screwed on £ wise.

She’s admits she is going for the shock effect ‘ barely legal ‘ , ‘Hubbies’ etc and I’d imagine a successful working girl would have seen more than a 1000 guys but not in one sitting, who’d have thought that was physically possible.

I was looking from a blokes perspective, and observation on behaviours.

what would the thoughts be with ticket no 500 in your hand knowing 499 before you and another 500 behind you, the floor strewn with used rubbers-Still fancy it ?

I was surprised when a Hubby popped up, who’d have thought 🤷‍♂️

££££££.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iaisonseekerMan
2 days ago

Liverpool

There's something eerie about how detached she is from her own body and emotions. Strikes me as someone who has done a lot of mental gymnastics to rationalise what she does and minimise any cognitive dissonance. Everything she does seems calculated and performative but, to be fair, she has that in common with most social media influencers. And is earning a lot more money.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
2 days ago

Ayrshire


"There's something eerie about how detached she is from her own body and emotions. Strikes me as someone who has done a lot of mental gymnastics to rationalise what she does and minimise any cognitive dissonance. Everything she does seems calculated and performative but, to be fair, she has that in common with most social media influencers. And is earning a lot more money."

Is there something equally eerie about the men who participated?

How do you suppose they rationalise the part they played?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *editerraneanguyMan
2 days ago

London

[Removed by poster at 30/07/25 21:54:46]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hager777Man
2 days ago

Hereford

Haven't seen it but I can imagine the lake if it was bareback

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iaisonseekerMan
2 days ago

Liverpool


"There's something eerie about how detached she is from her own body and emotions. Strikes me as someone who has done a lot of mental gymnastics to rationalise what she does and minimise any cognitive dissonance. Everything she does seems calculated and performative but, to be fair, she has that in common with most social media influencers. And is earning a lot more money.

Is there something equally eerie about the men who participated?

How do you suppose they rationalise the part they played?"

Hard to say as none of them were interviewed (unless you mean her support team rather than the gangbangers). It would have been interesting if they had been but it would have been a very different documentary.

I thought her live-in videographer was similar though with his praise for her and Andrew Tate as marketing "geniuses" that glossed over the transgressive nature of their content.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issilia AmoriWoman
2 days ago

St Albans/ North Welsh Borders


"There's something eerie about how detached she is from her own body and emotions. Strikes me as someone who has done a lot of mental gymnastics to rationalise what she does and minimise any cognitive dissonance. Everything she does seems calculated and performative but, to be fair, she has that in common with most social media influencers. And is earning a lot more money.

Is there something equally eerie about the men who participated?

How do you suppose they rationalise the part they played?

Hard to say as none of them were interviewed (unless you mean her support team rather than the gangbangers). It would have been interesting if they had been but it would have been a very different documentary.

I thought her live-in videographer was similar though with his praise for her and Andrew Tate as marketing "geniuses" that glossed over the transgressive nature of their content."

She's clever, it's clear to see. But the way she speaks about other women and her controversy is calculated. With that level and lack of emotion and empathy if she wasn't going to be a porn performer she was going to be a serial killer....at least no men died I guess.

She loves the attention, negative or positive. It matters not to her.

I mean, the woman has no bearing on my life I just worry about the young minds being influenced by her motives and actions....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ildmanYorksMan
2 days ago

Doncaster

Just done the maths. 12 hours = 43,200 seconds, divided by 1057 makes it each guy got 40.87 seconds! Must have been a load of premature ejaculators!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inchestersBitchWoman
2 days ago

land of overweight munters


"Just done the maths. 12 hours = 43,200 seconds, divided by 1057 makes it each guy got 40.87 seconds! Must have been a load of premature ejaculators!!

"

There was a women on her payroll that was timing it. She said about 40 secs per person

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *effdelightMan
2 days ago

Grimsby

Is it just me or is she actually really quite beautiful?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nemoretime2000Man
2 days ago

Glasgow

I’d get involved. But probably be wracked with guilt for 3 or 4 days afterwards… hey ho

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ivpoolmanMan
2 days ago

Liverpool


"I’d get involved. But probably be wracked with guilt for 3 or 4 days afterwards… hey ho "

She’a a hoe..

Calculated and rich admittedly..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ocomotiveMan
2 days ago

Sunderland


"Just done the maths. 12 hours = 43,200 seconds, divided by 1057 makes it each guy got 40.87 seconds! Must have been a load of premature ejaculators!!

There was a women on her payroll that was timing it. She said about 40 secs per person "

Longer than I usually get. 😁

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *reachersdaughterWoman
17 hours ago

Someplace

[Removed by poster at 31/07/25 07:53:16]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enno212Man
17 hours ago

Cramlington

Yes i would

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *reachersdaughterWoman
17 hours ago

Someplace


"People on here always judging this woman but have no smoke for the men who queue up for her. It's giving misogyny. Why is it her fault that these men cheat on their wives? If it wasn't her it'd be someone else. 🙄

The thread is about her, not anyone else. I have just as much distaste for the men that cheat as I have for her. Just because it may be 'someone else', doesn't make it ok. Just because it's 'her body', doesn't make it ok when she's targeting 'barely legal' teens or virgins, and saying the wives or partners are asking for it, or should do better!! I despair "

It's constant on here, and it's weird cos this is literally a sex site. We have threads on here where men and women literally admit to fucking 18 year olds, and not once have i ever seen anyone saying anything to them. Why is that? People only say all this stuff about her online but would never say it to her face. It's actually mad. 🙄

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mateur100Man
17 hours ago

nr faversham


"Just done the maths. 12 hours = 43,200 seconds, divided by 1057 makes it each guy got 40.87 seconds! Must have been a load of premature ejaculators!!

There was a women on her payroll that was timing it. She said about 40 secs per person

Longer than I usually get. 😁"

TBH you're surrounded by hundreds of people and being filmed so it's hardly surprising

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *midnight-Woman
16 hours ago

...

I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it.

I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ?

I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18.

They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ?

I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society

I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag].

1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
16 hours ago

Leeds


"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it.

I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ?

I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18.

They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ?

I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society

I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag].

1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society? "

Because it's always the "woman's fault"

Totally agree with everything you've said....If it were a guy lining up a 1000 "barely legal female teens" he would be seen as some kind of stud!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *reachersdaughterWoman
16 hours ago

Someplace


"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it.

I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ?

I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18.

They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ?

I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society

I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag].

1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society? "

Exactly this. They will never hold the men accountable and they will always coddle men no matter how old they are.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weetiepie99Woman
16 hours ago

cardiff


"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it.

I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ?

I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18.

They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ?

I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society

I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag].

1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society? "

I would feel exactly the same if it was a man, and there were women queuing up, except it probably would never happen the other way around.

It's her 'exploitation' of the very young and virgins I find really awful. They are not in the 'industry', a lot are students with their futures ahead of them, just for 2 mins of fame which will be on the Internet forever.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
16 hours ago

Leeds


"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it.

I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ?

I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18.

They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ?

I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society

I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag].

1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society?

I would feel exactly the same if it was a man, and there were women queuing up, except it probably would never happen the other way around.

It's her 'exploitation' of the very young and virgins I find really awful. They are not in the 'industry', a lot are students with their futures ahead of them, just for 2 mins of fame which will be on the Internet forever."

But is she really exploiting anyone?? The guys who film with her aren't that dumb or niave surely!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weetiepie99Woman
16 hours ago

cardiff


"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it.

I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ?

I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18.

They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ?

I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society

I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag].

1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society?

I would feel exactly the same if it was a man, and there were women queuing up, except it probably would never happen the other way around.

It's her 'exploitation' of the very young and virgins I find really awful. They are not in the 'industry', a lot are students with their futures ahead of them, just for 2 mins of fame which will be on the Internet forever.

But is she really exploiting anyone?? The guys who film with her aren't that dumb or niave surely! "

I think they really are, girls too who have never done anything like this before, nervous and flustered, that's part of their appeal for her.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovelyDayXXXWoman
16 hours ago

Niche

Her being what passes for many as pretty and a young white female is aiding and abetting the most awful moral decline.

It's grim on so many levels.

You can talk about consent all day long. These actions may be legal but that doesn't make them ok or right or to be encouraged.

There's plenty in life that's legal (related/unrelated to sex) that people would never condone.

People and society have lost their way hugely.

And no I didn't watch it. I don't want that in my head any more than it already is from the headlines and socials 😵‍💫😭

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
16 hours ago

Ayrshire


"Her being what passes for many as pretty and a young white female is aiding and abetting the most awful moral decline.

"

Are you saying her, or women like her are responsible for this decline?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

16 hours ago

East Sussex

She's a symptom not the cause.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovelyDayXXXWoman
16 hours ago

Niche


"She's a symptom not the cause.

"

Very much, yes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovelyDayXXXWoman
16 hours ago

Niche


"Her being what passes for many as pretty and a young white female is aiding and abetting the most awful moral decline.

Are you saying her, or women like her are responsible for this decline?"

Absolutely not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
16 hours ago

Leeds


"She's a symptom not the cause.

"

💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovelyDayXXXWoman
16 hours ago

Niche

I'm saying, substitute any or all of those characteristics and think what the response would be.

I don't think it would be the same. That's all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

16 hours ago

East Sussex


"She's a symptom not the cause.

💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme."

While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned.

The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *og and MuseCouple
16 hours ago

Dubai & Nottingham


"She's a symptom not the cause.

"

reality is in social science it is often both / cyclical, she sex in the standard of what’s acceptable, by taking it just a little bit further.

The feelings/reactions this woman causes in people says more about them than her.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovelyDayXXXWoman
16 hours ago

Niche

Feelings/reactions are always about the person experiencing them.

That's how they work.

And we're all responsible for our own.

But we're also responsible for our actions and the effect they have on others.

It's all part of being a responsible adult existing in a shared society and space.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pthillMan
16 hours ago

st shithole


"Watched the C4 Cockumentary last night .

So would you or did you ?

"

Sooner wank

A dead eyed disturbed skank

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inchestersBitchWoman
16 hours ago

land of overweight munters

The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her.

If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
16 hours ago

Leeds


"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her.

If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not.

"

Everyone knows that forum threads never stay on the topic posted...they always derail at some point.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
16 hours ago

Ayrshire


"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her.

If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not.

"

Without the 1000 plus men who participated, there would be no discussion of her.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weetiepie99Woman
16 hours ago

cardiff


"She's a symptom not the cause.

💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme.

While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned.

The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening. "

It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

15 hours ago

East Sussex


"She's a symptom not the cause.

💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme.

While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned.

The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening.

It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry"

Why isn't anyone stepping in?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mateur100Man
15 hours ago

nr faversham


"She's a symptom not the cause.

💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme.

While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned.

The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening.

It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry

Why isn't anyone stepping in? "

I thought 1000+ stepped in?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *reachersdaughterWoman
15 hours ago

Someplace


"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her.

If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not.

"

Well, why wouldn't people bring up the men participating? Who is she having sex with? Men? Like.....cmon

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

15 hours ago

East Sussex


"She's a symptom not the cause.

💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme.

While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned.

The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening.

It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry

Why isn't anyone stepping in?

I thought 1000+ stepped in? "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weetiepie99Woman
15 hours ago

cardiff


"She's a symptom not the cause.

💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme.

While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned.

The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening.

It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry

Why isn't anyone stepping in? "

Good question. I guess because no law is being broken and of course it's a money spinner

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

15 hours ago

East Sussex


"She's a symptom not the cause.

💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme.

While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned.

The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening.

It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry

Why isn't anyone stepping in?

Good question. I guess because no law is being broken and of course it's a money spinner"

Money will be why the people close to the situation are supporting these events. More widely though if people believe there's exploitation of naive youngsters going on why are we all watching without attempting to stop it whether it's legal or not?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

15 hours ago

East Sussex

If I discovered one of my kids or anyone I knew was planning on going ahead with something like this I would be having very serious conversations with them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inchestersBitchWoman
15 hours ago

land of overweight munters


"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her.

If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not.

Well, why wouldn't people bring up the men participating? Who is she having sex with? Men? Like.....cmon"

Nah, I won't cmon.

I've got my views, you've got yours, everyone's got views, we don't have to agree

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weetiepie99Woman
15 hours ago

cardiff


"She's a symptom not the cause.

💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme.

While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned.

The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening.

It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry

Why isn't anyone stepping in?

Good question. I guess because no law is being broken and of course it's a money spinner

Money will be why the people close to the situation are supporting these events. More widely though if people believe there's exploitation of naive youngsters going on why are we all watching without attempting to stop it whether it's legal or not? "

Again, I don't know. I mean what could anyone do? I have seen many critical of her though and the exploitation. Apparently a journalist watched the documentary with her father, and he was looking away and uncomfortable (obviously) and yet allegedly he is her biggest supporter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod

15 hours ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it.

I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ?

I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18.

They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ?

I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society

I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag].

1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society? "

I watched it last night.

She's open about the fact that most of her posts are deliberate 'rage bait', especially the references to wives and partners. Likewise the age references are designed to shock. It's marketing. Her target audience isnt the women she's 'insulting' on camera. It's the men, whether young guys who are horny singletons or married men looking for a quick fix cheap thrill. She stated exactly that and that it's her niche.

And seemingly those men lap it up. If they didn't, and she didnt get the responses, clicks and subscriptions she'd probably have looked for another angle. Even the abuse she gets online drives the exposure further and gives more free publicity.

If there was no demand for her content we'd never have heard of her. If people (ok men) had no interest in watching what she created then there'd be no content made, no headlines in the press and she'd fade into obscurity like many before her have done.

Do I agree with what she does? In terms of content, no. But she's evidently found a very successful angle, is raking in money and will be set for life in the next year or so.

The content may not be to the taste of many, but that's no different with much that's produced and shown in porn or content creation websites. It's not compulsory to watch, enjoy or participate in, and whether you feel some involved are too young or not, at least there's full consent given in all cases and anonymity offered if desired for any participants.

The only thing I found particularly disturbing in the documentary was her going to do an interview with Tate and the fact she said she'd fuck him. But then it was obviously being done simply for more exposure and with an estimated billion views she wasn't wrong on that.

I won't judge her for her choices so long as everything she does is consensual. I have zero interest in watching her content though, the same as I have none in 90% of adult content ever created.

To cold hard truth is she's providing content men evidently want to watch and getting very rich doing so. If she wasn't, there'd be someone else to fill the gap in a heartbeat.

As another forum regular frequently posts....."Don't hate the player, hate the game". 🤷‍♂️

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

15 hours ago

East Sussex


"She's a symptom not the cause.

💯% and as long as these guys keep enabling her, she and others will continue and no doubt get more extreme.

While we're frothing at the mouth about her horrible and unspeakable exploitation is going on just under the surface and blind eyes are being turned.

The blame being apportioned to her and not the men is one reason that is happening.

It's not just men though enabling this, it's women too, young men and women are for now her target, with no experience and not in the porn industry

Why isn't anyone stepping in?

Good question. I guess because no law is being broken and of course it's a money spinner

Money will be why the people close to the situation are supporting these events. More widely though if people believe there's exploitation of naive youngsters going on why are we all watching without attempting to stop it whether it's legal or not?

Again, I don't know. I mean what could anyone do? I have seen many critical of her though and the exploitation. Apparently a journalist watched the documentary with her father, and he was looking away and uncomfortable (obviously) and yet allegedly he is her biggest supporter "

I would rather that one if my kids didn't have sex with 1000 people and stream it. I'd do my best to talk them out of it for all sorts of reasons but if they went ahead I would support them but not the actions. If I thought they were exploiting anyone I would do my damndest to prevent that by any means possible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *midnight-Woman
15 hours ago

...


"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it.

I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ?

I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18.

They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ?

I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society

I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag].

1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society?

I would feel exactly the same if it was a man, and there were women queuing up, except it probably would never happen the other way around.

It's her 'exploitation' of the very young and virgins I find really awful. They are not in the 'industry', a lot are students with their futures ahead of them, just for 2 mins of fame which will be on the Internet forever."

The only difference I see with a club setting is that they [young students+ virgins] are not filmed - I would imagine for most participants it's a trophy and will become their 'interesting fact' in later life.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

15 hours ago

East Sussex

^^ Victoria Coren Mitchell can mention it as she introduces them on Only Connect

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *midnight-Woman
15 hours ago

...


"I haven't seen it yet, but I might watch it.

I'm sure a lot of the language 'barely legal' is deliberately headline catching to create a frenzy of publicity.. it's working ne c'est pas ?

I mean the barely legals are actually adults in law - able to have sex from 16, drive from 17 and drink and vote from 18.

They may be young and full of cum, but are we really saying all young men are too dumb to be allowed to make decisions .. When is the right age for all of the above... 21..25... 30 ?

I would think given the chance most men, young or old, would say yes to sex if it's on the plate with little regard for the future .... and judgement of society

I still continue to be dismayed at the different standard we hold women to (she's a vile slag) vs the innocent men who took a ticket to stand in line, and had their innocence exploited [by said slag].

1000 men said yes. 1000. Husbands, sons, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, cousins - they had a choice.. they said yes. They waited.. they participated....why aren't they also judged by society?

I watched it last night.

She's open about the fact that most of her posts are deliberate 'rage bait', especially the references to wives and partners. Likewise the age references are designed to shock. It's marketing. Her target audience isnt the women she's 'insulting' on camera. It's the men, whether young guys who are horny singletons or married men looking for a quick fix cheap thrill. She stated exactly that and that it's her niche.

And seemingly those men lap it up. If they didn't, and she didnt get the responses, clicks and subscriptions she'd probably have looked for another angle. Even the abuse she gets online drives the exposure further and gives more free publicity.

If there was no demand for her content we'd never have heard of her. If people (ok men) had no interest in watching what she created then there'd be no content made, no headlines in the press and she'd fade into obscurity like many before her have done.

Do I agree with what she does? In terms of content, no. But she's evidently found a very successful angle, is raking in money and will be set for life in the next year or so.

The content may not be to the taste of many, but that's no different with much that's produced and shown in porn or content creation websites. It's not compulsory to watch, enjoy or participate in, and whether you feel some involved are too young or not, at least there's full consent given in all cases and anonymity offered if desired for any participants.

The only thing I found particularly disturbing in the documentary was her going to do an interview with Tate and the fact she said she'd fuck him. But then it was obviously being done simply for more exposure and with an estimated billion views she wasn't wrong on that.

I won't judge her for her choices so long as everything she does is consensual. I have zero interest in watching her content though, the same as I have none in 90% of adult content ever created.

To cold hard truth is she's providing content men evidently want to watch and getting very rich doing so. If she wasn't, there'd be someone else to fill the gap in a heartbeat.

As another forum regular frequently posts....."Don't hate the player, hate the game". 🤷‍♂️"

If I could like this post, I would 👍👍

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eavenscentitCouple
2 hours ago

barnstaple

I watched it today, I found her uninteresting.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
2 hours ago

Crumpet Castle


"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her.

If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not.

Everyone knows that forum threads never stay on the topic posted...they always derail at some point."

When is it bin day ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he OpalsnakeMan
2 hours ago

Thirsk


"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her.

If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not.

Everyone knows that forum threads never stay on the topic posted...they always derail at some point.

When is it bin day ?"

Ah shit I forgot the bins!! Thanks Granny 😉

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *es not the MessiahMan
2 hours ago

3rd rock from the sun

No

Wouldn't touch her with yours

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *parkle1974Woman
2 hours ago

Leeds


"The comments above are about how it's not just her, it's the men too....but the thread is titled just about her.

If the thread was like the other threads started about her and the men then the comments would be valid to me, but it's not.

Everyone knows that forum threads never stay on the topic posted...they always derail at some point.

When is it bin day ?"

Mine is tomorrow

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top