Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This morning I've seen this horrific story. Basically, girl, been drinking, speeding, kills two people and gets only 11 years? Why do we continue to treat car drivers who cause death so leniently? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68743394 " It disgusts me There was an accident near me recently, a speeding driver lost control and crashed into a lady walking her dog. Her dog killed instantly and the lady has had to have her leg amputed with talk of having to amputate the other. The lady was a runner and was due to run the London Marathon after waiting years to participate Tha driver of the car got bailed after initially being arrested. I know I just could not live with myself if I caused so much pain and hurt to another and their family No sentence for causing death or life changing injury is lenient enough IMHO | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think an 11 year sentence is lenient " This. Especially these days. Which is a sad reflection on our legal system really. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Horrible . I always said that d*unk drivers get away with murder. If you drive a car d*unk it's premeditated in my opinion " Agreed and should get an automatic minimum 15 year sentence no excuses and a minimum of 15 not out on parole after 7 and loss of licence for life. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Horrible . I always said that d*unk drivers get away with murder. If you drive a car d*unk it's premeditated in my opinion Agreed and should get an automatic minimum 15 year sentence no excuses and a minimum of 15 not out on parole after 7 and loss of licence for life." How would you qualify that though? 15yrs for being just over the limit? Then raising the sentence depending on by how much? I don't think the fact that there a legal limit exists at all helps. Most people misjudge how much alcohol that actually looks like, and how long it takes individual bodies to process it. Loads of folk on the roads the next morning after a good drinking session too, who are probably over the limit. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem is that holding drivers to account for their actions, or in any way restricting them, is incredibly unpopular. The guy that keeps destroying the local speed camera is considered a folk hero, as an example. People consider driving a right that must not be taken from them, and not a privilege that comes with associated responsibilities. But the police/courts have been getting harsher on sentencing when they do have evidence, at least here in Birmingham. I know of a few cases where friends have caught bad driving on cameras and the drivers have gotten 6 points, at one point a short prison sentence. I think the tide is turning on this." Very well said in my opinion. I live in a town centre about 3 minutes walk to the High Street. I see speeding cars and inconsiderate driving all the time. But our Prime Minister has repeatedly backed motorists and labelled the Opposition as "anti-car" thus politicising the issue and dividing society. My 5 year old cousin was killed by a car. 70 years later both his parents died from natural causes but they never ever overcame their grief. We could do a lot more with cameras, drones etc. And hopefully you are right that the tide is turning. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If we're driving we just don't drink anything alcoholic. " Me neither, every time you go over a bump you just end up spilling it in your lap. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Horrible . I always said that d*unk drivers get away with murder. If you drive a car d*unk it's premeditated in my opinion Agreed and should get an automatic minimum 15 year sentence no excuses and a minimum of 15 not out on parole after 7 and loss of licence for life. How would you qualify that though? 15yrs for being just over the limit? Then raising the sentence depending on by how much? I don't think the fact that there a legal limit exists at all helps. Most people misjudge how much alcohol that actually looks like, and how long it takes individual bodies to process it. Loads of folk on the roads the next morning after a good drinking session too, who are probably over the limit. " Thing is. It's a max limit. Not a target. Lots of countries now have zero alcohol. For a reason. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They need to make the test much, much harder. We currently have a test idiots can pass easily. They don’t even make them do reverse round corner, 3 point turn and parallel park these days. You only have to do one of those not all three. This opened the gates to truly shit drivers who have no spacial reasoning and situational awareness. " Agreed, but there’s also a problem with attitude. Some people become irrational and aggressive, and that’s not something which shows up on a test. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If we're driving we just don't drink anything alcoholic. " Exactly. It's not a difficult decision then, is it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem is that holding drivers to account for their actions, or in any way restricting them, is incredibly unpopular. The guy that keeps destroying the local speed camera is considered a folk hero, as an example. People consider driving a right that must not be taken from them, and not a privilege that comes with associated responsibilities. But the police/courts have been getting harsher on sentencing when they do have evidence, at least here in Birmingham. I know of a few cases where friends have caught bad driving on cameras and the drivers have gotten 6 points, at one point a short prison sentence. I think the tide is turning on this. Very well said in my opinion. I live in a town centre about 3 minutes walk to the High Street. I see speeding cars and inconsiderate driving all the time. But our Prime Minister has repeatedly backed motorists and labelled the Opposition as "anti-car" thus politicising the issue and dividing society. My 5 year old cousin was killed by a car. 70 years later both his parents died from natural causes but they never ever overcame their grief. We could do a lot more with cameras, drones etc. And hopefully you are right that the tide is turning." My Aunt was killed by a drink driver, age 16, whilst crossing the road outside her college. She was on her lunch break. It happened before I was born, in the late 70s. My Grandparents never, ever got over it and Grandad talked about her right up until the very last. I don't know that the driver was ever caught. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've just had a read and she asked bystanders not to call an ambulance because she'd get arrested " Yeh, pretty reprehensible. The police should have the resources to stop people like this before such a tragedy. Probably wasn't the first time she was being an ass while driving. I see this sort of thing on the road far more often than I should. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've just had a read and she asked bystanders not to call an ambulance because she'd get arrested Yeh, pretty reprehensible. The police should have the resources to stop people like this before such a tragedy. Probably wasn't the first time she was being an ass while driving. I see this sort of thing on the road far more often than I should." People should have the good common sense and intelligence to not drive under the influence in the first place.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |