FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

School hols

Jump to newest
 

By *hubby guy 999 OP   Man
over a year ago

BISHOP AUCKLAND

If Teachers can strike how many people going to take kids out of school in term time using the strike as a reason to save lots of money and its ok for them not to teach in term time but we can't take kids out of school as it has a huge negative affect on there learning

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osey WalesMan
over a year ago

.

I have taken mine out on holiday (a few days before they break up. Not mid term) for holidays. The fine that may be impossed but never has been, is far less than the financial saving.

Does it have an effect on my childs education? I dont think so, not at her age when all she tells me they do is watch films half the day anyway.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

I think it's difficult to argue that you shouldn't take your children out for holidays while teachers are striking.

I do think that a year long boycott of holiday companies during school holiday time might have the effect of bringing prices down though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I took mine out for a week in October before strikes - if you want to take them out and save hundreds on a holiday, why the hell not. I just accepted and paid the fine - sorted haha & I'll keep doing it. Saved well over £1000 going in term time, plus airports and resorts are loads quieter then which is a plus! X

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alocheziaMan
over a year ago

Ayrshire


"... its ok for them not to teach in term time "

Strike action would be a lot less effective if it didn't occur during term time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"... its ok for them not to teach in term time

Strike action would be a lot less effective if it didn't occur during term time "

. It would take longer to take effect that's for sure but eventually unmarked work and lack of preparation for lessons would become obvious.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No I am not going to have my kids miss more time in school and risk fines. That would be daft of me. And I support teachers' right to strike even though it affects my ability to work.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

98% of the ‘education’ they give our kids is useless knowledge not useful in todays world, taking them out for a holiday isn’t bad for their education in the slightest

It’s good for their moral balance and teaching kids to put themselves before a system is a good thing for humans but bad for an economy we’re training these kids to be in

Hence the arguments it brings

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"98% of the ‘education’ they give our kids is useless knowledge not useful in todays world, taking them out for a holiday isn’t bad for their education in the slightest

It’s good for their moral balance and teaching kids to put themselves before a system is a good thing for humans but bad for an economy we’re training these kids to be in

Hence the arguments it brings

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"98% of the ‘education’ they give our kids is useless knowledge not useful in todays world, taking them out for a holiday isn’t bad for their education in the slightest

It’s good for their moral balance and teaching kids to put themselves before a system is a good thing for humans but bad for an economy we’re training these kids to be in

Hence the arguments it brings

"

I don't suppose anything to back up the "98% of the education is useless" statement?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"98% of the ‘education’ they give our kids is useless knowledge not useful in todays world, taking them out for a holiday isn’t bad for their education in the slightest

It’s good for their moral balance and teaching kids to put themselves before a system is a good thing for humans but bad for an economy we’re training these kids to be in

Hence the arguments it brings

"

98% blimey !

So reading,writing and basic maths and that's it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellhungvweMan
over a year ago

Cheltenham

I don’t think a day or two will harm a child’s education but the longer you take them out whilst the others are working then it probably isn’t going to help them.

That said - I do think the amount of schooling that has been lost over the past few years with lockdown and strikes does make a mockery of any attempt to fine people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"98% of the ‘education’ they give our kids is useless knowledge not useful in todays world, taking them out for a holiday isn’t bad for their education in the slightest

It’s good for their moral balance and teaching kids to put themselves before a system is a good thing for humans but bad for an economy we’re training these kids to be in

Hence the arguments it brings

98% blimey !

So reading,writing and basic maths and that's it?"

I mean we’re speaking over a minimum of ages 4 to 16 plus higher education for specifics, so I’d say about 2% over a decade+ would be pretty accurate sure

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You don't get fined here. Obviously it's encouraged that you try not to holiday during the term, but as long as their attendance is good the rest of the year, a wee week off isn't really challenged.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"98% of the ‘education’ they give our kids is useless knowledge not useful in todays world, taking them out for a holiday isn’t bad for their education in the slightest

It’s good for their moral balance and teaching kids to put themselves before a system is a good thing for humans but bad for an economy we’re training these kids to be in

Hence the arguments it brings

98% blimey !

So reading,writing and basic maths and that's it?

I mean we’re speaking over a minimum of ages 4 to 16 plus higher education for specifics, so I’d say about 2% over a decade+ would be pretty accurate sure "

I suppose it depends how much you value education. I do know that for some people the basics are all they want. Do you think we could condense formal education into fewer years and give people the tools to learn what they want rather than what the state says they should?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urve_your_enthusiasmWoman
over a year ago

Manchester

A scary thread! First of all, teachers don't decide on the fine system and they suffer from the holiday costs. They don't have the option to go on holiday at a different time and please don't say they're always on holiday. The strikes are a respond to a crisis that the government refuses to address.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obilebottomMan
over a year ago

All over


"A scary thread! First of all, teachers don't decide on the fine system and they suffer from the holiday costs. They don't have the option to go on holiday at a different time and please don't say they're always on holiday. The strikes are a respond to a crisis that the government refuses to address. "

part of the issue is the warped ideas people have about what it takes these days to be a teacher when not only most work well into the night to prepare, have to deal with massive issues the kids have and deal with unsupportive and often arrogant at best, aggressive and abusive at worst, parents. Though of course also many parents appreciate what teachers do and work well with the schools and teachers to give the best they can to their kids. These days there seem to be no appreciation and respect for the profession as should. Yes not all teachers are great but that's for schools to address those shortcomings. Most of us would not have amounted to much without good teachers.

Regarding holidays, it's a sensitive subject and personally don't agree with taking kids out during term time but it's also shocking that holidays become so expensive during holidays that some parents feel they have no other choice. In any event what is best for the child must always come first before and hopefully that's what most good parents do

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"98% of the ‘education’ they give our kids is useless knowledge not useful in todays world, taking them out for a holiday isn’t bad for their education in the slightest

It’s good for their moral balance and teaching kids to put themselves before a system is a good thing for humans but bad for an economy we’re training these kids to be in

Hence the arguments it brings

98% blimey !

So reading,writing and basic maths and that's it?

I mean we’re speaking over a minimum of ages 4 to 16 plus higher education for specifics, so I’d say about 2% over a decade+ would be pretty accurate sure

I suppose it depends how much you value education. I do know that for some people the basics are all they want. Do you think we could condense formal education into fewer years and give people the tools to learn what they want rather than what the state says they should? "

Yes, very much so, schools are the only thing we haven’t updated in centuries, we don’t have the need to pump out factory workers anymore. Kids now are so innovative and learn so fast we don’t need to drill and force, just give them the tools to learn it’s amazing what new perspectives they have and can show us

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andyfloss2000Woman
over a year ago

ashford

In 2010 I took 2 of mine out for a holiday beginning of September as was not within my budget to go in holidays! At the time Tony Blair had taken his children on holiday! I pointed this out to the head and she said I see your point I will forward your letter on to him! As it turns out I'm very glad I did as their father (my ex) came with us sadly he died 6 weeks or so later! So memories that I think were far more important than learning were made ! X

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"98% of the ‘education’ they give our kids is useless knowledge not useful in todays world, taking them out for a holiday isn’t bad for their education in the slightest

It’s good for their moral balance and teaching kids to put themselves before a system is a good thing for humans but bad for an economy we’re training these kids to be in

Hence the arguments it brings

98% blimey !

So reading,writing and basic maths and that's it?

I mean we’re speaking over a minimum of ages 4 to 16 plus higher education for specifics, so I’d say about 2% over a decade+ would be pretty accurate sure

I suppose it depends how much you value education. I do know that for some people the basics are all they want. Do you think we could condense formal education into fewer years and give people the tools to learn what they want rather than what the state says they should?

Yes, very much so, schools are the only thing we haven’t updated in centuries, we don’t have the need to pump out factory workers anymore. Kids now are so innovative and learn so fast we don’t need to drill and force, just give them the tools to learn it’s amazing what new perspectives they have and can show us

"

I'm inclined to agree because I know I would have achieved far more in that environment. Imagine going to school and being educated according to your strengths and interests. What a lovely place to be.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A scary thread! First of all, teachers don't decide on the fine system and they suffer from the holiday costs. They don't have the option to go on holiday at a different time and please don't say they're always on holiday. The strikes are a respond to a crisis that the government refuses to address.

part of the issue is the warped ideas people have about what it takes these days to be a teacher when not only most work well into the night to prepare, have to deal with massive issues the kids have and deal with unsupportive and often arrogant at best, aggressive and abusive at worst, parents. Though of course also many parents appreciate what teachers do and work well with the schools and teachers to give the best they can to their kids. These days there seem to be no appreciation and respect for the profession as should. Yes not all teachers are great but that's for schools to address those shortcomings. Most of us would not have amounted to much without good teachers.

Regarding holidays, it's a sensitive subject and personally don't agree with taking kids out during term time but it's also shocking that holidays become so expensive during holidays that some parents feel they have no other choice. In any event what is best for the child must always come first before and hopefully that's what most good parents do "

I agree, I think teachers should strike and it’s long long overdue

Schools now are used as child care unfortunately, kids don’t need a 9-5 Monday to Friday yet it’s fits perfectly for the economy as a whole so the adults can keep ticking away as needed

Remember the push to get the schools open rather than let them stay remote, because half the workforce couldn’t get back to work

It’s an unfortunate elephant in the room

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urve_your_enthusiasmWoman
over a year ago

Manchester

What needs to be mentioned as well is that for a lot of children/teenagers school is a safe place. The only place where they know what to expect with routines etc. A place where they can trust adults.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"What needs to be mentioned as well is that for a lot of children/teenagers school is a safe place. The only place where they know what to expect with routines etc. A place where they can trust adults. "

I agree with teachers striking but strikes remove that safety from them for the duration

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"98% of the ‘education’ they give our kids is useless knowledge not useful in todays world, taking them out for a holiday isn’t bad for their education in the slightest

It’s good for their moral balance and teaching kids to put themselves before a system is a good thing for humans but bad for an economy we’re training these kids to be in

Hence the arguments it brings

98% blimey !

So reading,writing and basic maths and that's it?

I mean we’re speaking over a minimum of ages 4 to 16 plus higher education for specifics, so I’d say about 2% over a decade+ would be pretty accurate sure

I suppose it depends how much you value education. I do know that for some people the basics are all they want. Do you think we could condense formal education into fewer years and give people the tools to learn what they want rather than what the state says they should?

Yes, very much so, schools are the only thing we haven’t updated in centuries, we don’t have the need to pump out factory workers anymore. Kids now are so innovative and learn so fast we don’t need to drill and force, just give them the tools to learn it’s amazing what new perspectives they have and can show us

I'm inclined to agree because I know I would have achieved far more in that environment. Imagine going to school and being educated according to your strengths and interests. What a lovely place to be. "

Honestly, I’m spouting from my own perspective of homeschooling, I’m trying not to give too much personal away lol but when I took mine out of school they couldn’t even read, they school hadn’t taught them, it’s now a few years later and the leaps and bounds we’ve made are insane, a few months ago they told me (correctly, I checked and it’s unbelievably accurate) that the action of looking at a star in the night sky is the equivalent of that star physically touching you because of how light works

We’re not even a teen yet, it’s nuts and all kids should have that freedom and opportunity

It’s almost cruel to not, if that makes any kind of sense

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"98% of the ‘education’ they give our kids is useless knowledge not useful in todays world, taking them out for a holiday isn’t bad for their education in the slightest

It’s good for their moral balance and teaching kids to put themselves before a system is a good thing for humans but bad for an economy we’re training these kids to be in

Hence the arguments it brings

98% blimey !

So reading,writing and basic maths and that's it?

I mean we’re speaking over a minimum of ages 4 to 16 plus higher education for specifics, so I’d say about 2% over a decade+ would be pretty accurate sure

I suppose it depends how much you value education. I do know that for some people the basics are all they want. Do you think we could condense formal education into fewer years and give people the tools to learn what they want rather than what the state says they should?

Yes, very much so, schools are the only thing we haven’t updated in centuries, we don’t have the need to pump out factory workers anymore. Kids now are so innovative and learn so fast we don’t need to drill and force, just give them the tools to learn it’s amazing what new perspectives they have and can show us

I'm inclined to agree because I know I would have achieved far more in that environment. Imagine going to school and being educated according to your strengths and interests. What a lovely place to be.

Honestly, I’m spouting from my own perspective of homeschooling, I’m trying not to give too much personal away lol but when I took mine out of school they couldn’t even read, they school hadn’t taught them, it’s now a few years later and the leaps and bounds we’ve made are insane, a few months ago they told me (correctly, I checked and it’s unbelievably accurate) that the action of looking at a star in the night sky is the equivalent of that star physically touching you because of how light works

We’re not even a teen yet, it’s nuts and all kids should have that freedom and opportunity

It’s almost cruel to not, if that makes any kind of sense "

The problem I can see is that not everyone has the ability, resources or motivation to provide that for their children. I do know that the most interesting people seem to have learned away from formal education or at least in conjunction with it. Perhaps the first step is encouraging independent thinking which does appear to be in short supply.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohn KanakaMan
over a year ago

Not all that North of North London

I don't think the strikes being justifiecation for being able to take kids on holiday in term time I'd an argument that stands up to any scrutiny.

But I think there is a real issue that children need the experiences that holidays bring and families need that time together yet far too many families are priced out of term time holidays and the cost of living crisis and amount of children living in poverty only exacerbates that.

Instead of getting angry at teachers striking, get angry at the government that have backed them in to that corner while simultaneously forcing families in to poverty.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"98% of the ‘education’ they give our kids is useless knowledge not useful in todays world, taking them out for a holiday isn’t bad for their education in the slightest

It’s good for their moral balance and teaching kids to put themselves before a system is a good thing for humans but bad for an economy we’re training these kids to be in

Hence the arguments it brings

98% blimey !

So reading,writing and basic maths and that's it?

I mean we’re speaking over a minimum of ages 4 to 16 plus higher education for specifics, so I’d say about 2% over a decade+ would be pretty accurate sure

I suppose it depends how much you value education. I do know that for some people the basics are all they want. Do you think we could condense formal education into fewer years and give people the tools to learn what they want rather than what the state says they should?

Yes, very much so, schools are the only thing we haven’t updated in centuries, we don’t have the need to pump out factory workers anymore. Kids now are so innovative and learn so fast we don’t need to drill and force, just give them the tools to learn it’s amazing what new perspectives they have and can show us

I'm inclined to agree because I know I would have achieved far more in that environment. Imagine going to school and being educated according to your strengths and interests. What a lovely place to be.

Honestly, I’m spouting from my own perspective of homeschooling, I’m trying not to give too much personal away lol but when I took mine out of school they couldn’t even read, they school hadn’t taught them, it’s now a few years later and the leaps and bounds we’ve made are insane, a few months ago they told me (correctly, I checked and it’s unbelievably accurate) that the action of looking at a star in the night sky is the equivalent of that star physically touching you because of how light works

We’re not even a teen yet, it’s nuts and all kids should have that freedom and opportunity

It’s almost cruel to not, if that makes any kind of sense

The problem I can see is that not everyone has the ability, resources or motivation to provide that for their children. I do know that the most interesting people seem to have learned away from formal education or at least in conjunction with it. Perhaps the first step is encouraging independent thinking which does appear to be in short supply."

I agree not everyone can find those resources and fulfill those needs but I think part of the reasons is because we’re become so used to mainstream schools the resources are hard to find

(MITocw is an awesome one for higher education if anyone who wants to nosy btw)

And I do think schools are a good place for some and a safe place too, just not for all, the whole one glove fits all thing is something we got too used to, we need more choices and support

Idk, it’s a complicated issue and I don’t think there is any specific one correct answer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don't think the strikes being justifiecation for being able to take kids on holiday in term time I'd an argument that stands up to any scrutiny.

But I think there is a real issue that children need the experiences that holidays bring and families need that time together yet far too many families are priced out of term time holidays and the cost of living crisis and amount of children living in poverty only exacerbates that.

Instead of getting angry at teachers striking, get angry at the government that have backed them in to that corner while simultaneously forcing families in to poverty. "

Well said!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ulieAndBeefCouple
over a year ago

Manchester-ish

Fining parents for taking kids out of school is government policy imposed on local authorities and schools, it isn't something that teachers chose to implement, so it's a bit of a leap to suggest they are being hypocritical by striking.

B

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *TG3Man
over a year ago

Dorchester


"If Teachers can strike how many people going to take kids out of school in term time using the strike as a reason to save lots of money and its ok for them not to teach in term time but we can't take kids out of school as it has a huge negative affect on there learning"
Exactly kids have a very short learning curve and are extremely perceptive to learning in their formative years its important that they are encouraged to learn especially in the early years of schooling, money is unimportant in this equation although people should be free to chose when they holiday, freedom of choice is becoming a rarity

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I back strikers 100% but I also back parents to take time out for holidays during term time as long the child’s attendance isn’t ridiculously low. Depending on the age of the child they could learn a lot more from a week abroad than they will in the average week of school.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ornado69Man
over a year ago

Princess Risborough

I teach privately, love the strikes more work for me. My classes for groups and privates are full

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top