Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes. Girls rule, boys drool " I pity the fool. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes. Girls rule, boys drool I pity the fool." So you should | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes. Girls rule, boys drool " I agree with this 100%. Extremely insightful post. You’re lovely by the way. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yep mostly. I don’t like those guys though. I like the few and far between ones who will say how they feel without worrying about upsetting all the hot ones because they don’t agree. There’s a few on here but not many. " What a load of old twaddle | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yep mostly. I don’t like those guys though. I like the few and far between ones who will say how they feel without worrying about upsetting all the hot ones because they don’t agree. There’s a few on here but not many. What a load of old twaddle " Haha. You’re definitely one of those. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yep mostly. I don’t like those guys though. I like the few and far between ones who will say how they feel without worrying about upsetting all the hot ones because they don’t agree. There’s a few on here but not many. This. Majority of the guys on here just simp over every woman, have an actual opinion!! Women only get away with what they do as men don't want to risk upsetting anyone. Sex is on the cards here! " Exactly. It’s so obvious too. Makes me wanna | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yep mostly. I don’t like those guys though. I like the few and far between ones who will say how they feel without worrying about upsetting all the hot ones because they don’t agree. There’s a few on here but not many. This. Majority of the guys on here just simp over every woman, have an actual opinion!! Women only get away with what they do as men don't want to risk upsetting anyone. Sex is on the cards here! " Until you realise it really isn't... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yep mostly. I don’t like those guys though. I like the few and far between ones who will say how they feel without worrying about upsetting all the hot ones because they don’t agree. There’s a few on here but not many. This. Majority of the guys on here just simp over every woman, have an actual opinion!! Women only get away with what they do as men don't want to risk upsetting anyone. Sex is on the cards here! " Pipe down Dave! . . 12 hours I've waited for that man it felt good | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes. Girls rule, boys drool I agree with this 100%. Extremely insightful post. You’re lovely by the way. " I know. Now kiss my feet | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Boys - win Girls - in the bin The mr " There’s only one way to sort this out. FIIIIIIIIIGHT! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Boys - win Girls - in the bin The mr " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Boys - win Girls - in the bin The mr There’s only one way to sort this out. FIIIIIIIIIGHT! " Boys - champs Girls - pants. Done, thanks for coming. The mr | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Boys - win Girls - in the bin The mr There’s only one way to sort this out. FIIIIIIIIIGHT! Boys - champs Girls - pants. Done, thanks for coming. The mr " What are little boys made of? Frogs and snails, And puppy-dogs' tails; That's what little boys are made of. What are little girls made of? What are little girls made of? Sugar and spice, And all that's nice; That's what little girls are made of. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yep mostly. I don’t like those guys though. I like the few and far between ones who will say how they feel without worrying about upsetting all the hot ones because they don’t agree. There’s a few on here but not many. This. Majority of the guys on here just simp over every woman, have an actual opinion!! Women only get away with what they do as men don't want to risk upsetting anyone. Sex is on the cards here! Pipe down Dave! . . 12 hours I've waited for that man it felt good " I'll give you that one. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Boys - win Girls - in the bin The mr There’s only one way to sort this out. FIIIIIIIIIGHT! Boys - champs Girls - pants. Done, thanks for coming. The mr What are little boys made of? Frogs and snails, And puppy-dogs' tails; That's what little boys are made of. What are little girls made of? What are little girls made of? Sugar and spice, And all that's nice; That's what little girls are made of. " Ok you win . I have nothing. The mr | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sometimes sure. Sometimes a person agrees with another a person because they're right. I don't like the simping. I also don't like people who feel the need to try and make little digs at others to try and prove how 'different' they are. That's almost as bad as the white knighting. Both are shit." Suppose it goes with the territory | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Boys - win Girls - in the bin The mr There’s only one way to sort this out. FIIIIIIIIIGHT! Boys - champs Girls - pants. Done, thanks for coming. The mr What are little boys made of? Frogs and snails, And puppy-dogs' tails; That's what little boys are made of. What are little girls made of? What are little girls made of? Sugar and spice, And all that's nice; That's what little girls are made of. " What are CDs made of? False lashes and a wig; And a bulge that's too big. That's what CDs are made of. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I actually was going make a forum about something like this such as about hierarchy in the forums and that if you against a certain group of users some of them weaponise tge report button to and just report threads they don't sit well with for example I had 3 topics about dark sex subjects such as exploitation and sex tourism etc and each time was banned because of people reporting it " They only ban if it’s not appropriate for the forum. They don’t ban if the majority just doesn’t agree with you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I actually was going make a forum about something like this such as about hierarchy in the forums and that if you against a certain group of users some of them weaponise tge report button to and just report threads they don't sit well with for example I had 3 topics about dark sex subjects such as exploitation and sex tourism etc and each time was banned because of people reporting it They only ban if it’s not appropriate for the forum. They don’t ban if the majority just doesn’t agree with you " who do you think gets moderator attention to report it i have also been told in forums to report someone for putting report people then was blocked when I explain to women that I wouldn't do just cause her and her group said so and then they reported my forum post under the guise of it realise mails when ats not the case reality as I said people weaponize the report button n forums, as the man said i can say something then yall disagree and thos who agree with u will suck up your ass and do as u please iv saw it happen been part of it twice hell I even got it for explaining who I am and alot of people in forums tried to take what I was saying in threads and spint it to make u to fall into a hate trap to say something that flags moderators or to get a ban iv had it 3 weeks in a row | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? " Those men are called Simps, there are a huge amount of them, sadly. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? " An age old occurance and quite comical to witness | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I actually was going make a forum about something like this such as about hierarchy in the forums and that if you against a certain group of users some of them weaponise tge report button to and just report threads they don't sit well with for example I had 3 topics about dark sex subjects such as exploitation and sex tourism etc and each time was banned because of people reporting it They only ban if it’s not appropriate for the forum. They don’t ban if the majority just doesn’t agree with you who do you think gets moderator attention to report it i have also been told in forums to report someone for putting report people then was blocked when I explain to women that I wouldn't do just cause her and her group said so and then they reported my forum post under the guise of it realise mails when ats not the case reality as I said people weaponize the report button n forums, as the man said i can say something then yall disagree and thos who agree with u will suck up your ass and do as u please iv saw it happen been part of it twice hell I even got it for explaining who I am and alot of people in forums tried to take what I was saying in threads and spint it to make u to fall into a hate trap to say something that flags moderators or to get a ban iv had it 3 weeks in a row" If you report someone I think the mods automatically block you and them from seeing each others profile. I’ve never reported anyone or anything ever so I’m not sure but that’s what I heard somewhere. It doesn’t matter whether one person or 10 people report something. If it’s not inappropriate for the forums they’re unlikely to ban you so you must have said or done something wrong to get a ban. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? An age old occurance and quite comical to witness" It is | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wait, I thought I ruled the forums Well this is embarrassing " What are we going to do tonight Brain??? #IfYouKnowYouKnow | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I disagree " you wood | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I actually was going make a forum about something like this such as about hierarchy in the forums and that if you against a certain group of users some of them weaponise tge report button to and just report threads they don't sit well with for example I had 3 topics about dark sex subjects such as exploitation and sex tourism etc and each time was banned because of people reporting it They only ban if it’s not appropriate for the forum. They don’t ban if the majority just doesn’t agree with you who do you think gets moderator attention to report it i have also been told in forums to report someone for putting report people then was blocked when I explain to women that I wouldn't do just cause her and her group said so and then they reported my forum post under the guise of it realise mails when ats not the case reality as I said people weaponize the report button n forums, as the man said i can say something then yall disagree and thos who agree with u will suck up your ass and do as u please iv saw it happen been part of it twice hell I even got it for explaining who I am and alot of people in forums tried to take what I was saying in threads and spint it to make u to fall into a hate trap to say something that flags moderators or to get a ban iv had it 3 weeks in a row If you report someone I think the mods automatically block you and them from seeing each others profile. I’ve never reported anyone or anything ever so I’m not sure but that’s what I heard somewhere. It doesn’t matter whether one person or 10 people report something. If it’s not inappropriate for the forums they’re unlikely to ban you so you must have said or done something wrong to get a ban. " yes I told you I spoke about the dark grey areas of sex that some people on this site like such as low income prozzies or sex tourism or even as I said about why cant we out messages on the site and every thread turns into a slag match 9f people trying say sarcastic witty original shit to make them seem attractive to those viewing it when I was discussing ultra serious topics even had people dm saying I'm sorry your thread went like that as there wasn't much help | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wait, I thought I ruled the forums Well this is embarrassing What are we going to do tonight Brain??? #IfYouKnowYouKnow" It’s a Coup I say!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Wait, I thought I ruled the forums Well this is embarrassing What are we going to do tonight Brain??? #IfYouKnowYouKnow" the same thing we do every night pinky | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? An age old occurance and quite comical to witness" Yes can definitely be comical, some people ate incredibly inconsistent in their opinions depending on who they are trying to impress! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I actually was going make a forum about something like this such as about hierarchy in the forums and that if you against a certain group of users some of them weaponise tge report button to and just report threads they don't sit well with for example I had 3 topics about dark sex subjects such as exploitation and sex tourism etc and each time was banned because of people reporting it They only ban if it’s not appropriate for the forum. They don’t ban if the majority just doesn’t agree with you who do you think gets moderator attention to report it i have also been told in forums to report someone for putting report people then was blocked when I explain to women that I wouldn't do just cause her and her group said so and then they reported my forum post under the guise of it realise mails when ats not the case reality as I said people weaponize the report button n forums, as the man said i can say something then yall disagree and thos who agree with u will suck up your ass and do as u please iv saw it happen been part of it twice hell I even got it for explaining who I am and alot of people in forums tried to take what I was saying in threads and spint it to make u to fall into a hate trap to say something that flags moderators or to get a ban iv had it 3 weeks in a row If you report someone I think the mods automatically block you and them from seeing each others profile. I’ve never reported anyone or anything ever so I’m not sure but that’s what I heard somewhere. It doesn’t matter whether one person or 10 people report something. If it’s not inappropriate for the forums they’re unlikely to ban you so you must have said or done something wrong to get a ban. yes I told you I spoke about the dark grey areas of sex that some people on this site like such as low income prozzies or sex tourism or even as I said about why cant we out messages on the site and every thread turns into a slag match 9f people trying say sarcastic witty original shit to make them seem attractive to those viewing it when I was discussing ultra serious topics even had people dm saying I'm sorry your thread went like that as there wasn't much help " People are always going to be witty and sarcastic on a forum. Happens on most threads. I think the swingers chat forum has less of that, from what I’ve heard. I don’t really go in there much. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? An age old occurance and quite comical to witness Yes can definitely be comical, some people ate incredibly inconsistent in their opinions depending on who they are trying to impress!" Yep! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? " I have noticed that phenomenon. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? I have noticed that phenomenon." Really from your swimming pool? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hate the sarcasm on the forums…" Me too. So childish. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hate the sarcasm on the forums…" Yeah sarcasm is the worst…… | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hate the sarcasm on the forums… Me too. So childish." Seen a few guys profiles and pics I’ve liked then seen them acting like horny school boys on the forums.. big turn off | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yes. Girls rule, boys drool " exactly this! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hate the sarcasm on the forums… Me too. So childish. Seen a few guys profiles and pics I’ve liked then seen them acting like horny school boys on the forums.. big turn off " What about horny college boys? LvM | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hate the sarcasm on the forums… Me too. So childish. Seen a few guys profiles and pics I’ve liked then seen them acting like horny school boys on the forums.. big turn off What about horny college boys? LvM" No boys at all for me I like a man | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? " Oh yes, of course that likely happens, and I’ve seen it in the ‘real world’ so much. I guess by nature us guys think too much with our cocks and are constantly just trying to get our end away, and think gaining favour this way will increase the chance of sex, when it likely doesn’t work. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Boys - win Girls - in the bin The mr There’s only one way to sort this out. FIIIIIIIIIGHT! Boys - champs Girls - pants. Done, thanks for coming. The mr What are little boys made of? Frogs and snails, And puppy-dogs' tails; That's what little boys are made of. What are little girls made of? What are little girls made of? Sugar and spice, And all that's nice; That's what little girls are made of. What are CDs made of? False lashes and a wig; And a bulge that's too big. That's what CDs are made of. " ...how did you know it was a wig? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? " It's way more complex than that. People will also disagree with certain posters to gain favour too. Person A doesn't like person B, I want to fuck Person A so I'll disagree with person B to make person A swoon. People can try and be far more subtle than just agreeing with their targets. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? It's way more complex than that. People will also disagree with certain posters to gain favour too. Person A doesn't like person B, I want to fuck Person A so I'll disagree with person B to make person A swoon. People can try and be far more subtle than just agreeing with their targets. " yeah I had make a forum about how brash and abbravise I am and that I know I will say and do things taht will make people hate me instantly and even that was reported and such by that sort of group of suck ups | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with Nora, and I agree with Coyote. And I agree with RB and Kanaka. Does that mean I wanna fuck them? Just checking... cos I may need to re-evaluate some shiz if it does. Also... I now have an earworm https://youtu.be/VBmMU_iwe6U You're welcome." if u agreed before you saw their post no but if just saying they argument sways you then subconscious maybe as you abandoned previous beliefs all on bassist that hot people said different | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with Nora, and I agree with Coyote. And I agree with RB and Kanaka. Does that mean I wanna fuck them? Just checking... cos I may need to re-evaluate some shiz if it does. Also... I now have an earworm https://youtu.be/VBmMU_iwe6U You're welcome.if u agreed before you saw their post no but if just saying they argument sways you then subconscious maybe as you abandoned previous beliefs all on bassist that hot people said different" Not even a little bit. I would never say that what you are claiming doesnt happen, of course it does. People want to have things in common with those they find attractive. And some people take that a step further (or a giant leap) and are obsequious and sycophantic towards those they find attractive, as they think it'll get them noticed by or make them more attractive to that person. But mostly what I see is people who have similar views on things agreeing with each other on those things, and those same people disagreeing on the things they disagree on. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Men rule the world and women rule...Fab forums. Seems fair " It does omg did i agree because i fancy you, who knows | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it amusing to see guys desperately trying to impress someone that they're never going the chance to meet, because of their preference or distance " Or even because women have little time for simping. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with Nora, and I agree with Coyote. And I agree with RB and Kanaka. Does that mean I wanna fuck them? Just checking... cos I may need to re-evaluate some shiz if it does. Also... I now have an earworm https://youtu.be/VBmMU_iwe6U You're welcome.if u agreed before you saw their post no but if just saying they argument sways you then subconscious maybe as you abandoned previous beliefs all on bassist that hot people said different Not even a little bit. I would never say that what you are claiming doesnt happen, of course it does. People want to have things in common with those they find attractive. And some people take that a step further (or a giant leap) and are obsequious and sycophantic towards those they find attractive, as they think it'll get them noticed by or make them more attractive to that person. But mostly what I see is people who have similar views on things agreeing with each other on those things, and those same people disagreeing on the things they disagree on." true thats why I said if you changed your belief solely on the fact you read what they said not because you had that prior existing beliefs this are two different scenarios | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with Nora, and I agree with Coyote. And I agree with RB and Kanaka. Does that mean I wanna fuck them? Just checking... cos I may need to re-evaluate some shiz if it does. Also... I now have an earworm https://youtu.be/VBmMU_iwe6U You're welcome.if u agreed before you saw their post no but if just saying they argument sways you then subconscious maybe as you abandoned previous beliefs all on bassist that hot people said different Not even a little bit. I would never say that what you are claiming doesnt happen, of course it does. People want to have things in common with those they find attractive. And some people take that a step further (or a giant leap) and are obsequious and sycophantic towards those they find attractive, as they think it'll get them noticed by or make them more attractive to that person. But mostly what I see is people who have similar views on things agreeing with each other on those things, and those same people disagreeing on the things they disagree on." I think this is true. It can sometimes look like you’re always agreeing with friends but that’s the reason they’re friends because you think similarly. There are actually very few people I’d actually get on with on these forums so yeah I can see how it can sometimes look like blowing smoke. Having said that there’s many a time I’ve publicly disagreed with people I see as friends on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with Nora, and I agree with Coyote. And I agree with RB and Kanaka. Does that mean I wanna fuck them? Just checking... cos I may need to re-evaluate some shiz if it does. Also... I now have an earworm https://youtu.be/VBmMU_iwe6U You're welcome.if u agreed before you saw their post no but if just saying they argument sways you then subconscious maybe as you abandoned previous beliefs all on bassist that hot people said different" It depends on your definition of hot. Some people have amazing pics and bios and are capable of maintaining a pleasant forum persona but have an extremely ugly attitude in private chat. I'm like marmite on here. Some enjoy the fact that I'm not afraid to offer my own opinion and that helps me stand out. Some get really annoyed that I'm not afraid to offer my own opinion and think I should only echo theirs. Some men get upset if I challenge a woman's opinion while at the same time the woman has no problem with my challenge. The answer to the question about women ruling the forums is that no one can rule anything if they are treated as equals rather than placed on pedestals just because they have boobs. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with Nora, and I agree with Coyote. And I agree with RB and Kanaka. Does that mean I wanna fuck them? Just checking... cos I may need to re-evaluate some shiz if it does. Also... I now have an earworm https://youtu.be/VBmMU_iwe6U You're welcome.if u agreed before you saw their post no but if just saying they argument sways you then subconscious maybe as you abandoned previous beliefs all on bassist that hot people said different Not even a little bit. I would never say that what you are claiming doesnt happen, of course it does. People want to have things in common with those they find attractive. And some people take that a step further (or a giant leap) and are obsequious and sycophantic towards those they find attractive, as they think it'll get them noticed by or make them more attractive to that person. But mostly what I see is people who have similar views on things agreeing with each other on those things, and those same people disagreeing on the things they disagree on." Agreed. It's not even so much about agreeing/disagreeing wit the person as it is about the viewpoint. Let's be honest, most people are indifferent to us. We don't really have that *much* of an impact on the vast majority of forum users, even if we like to think that people love/hate us. Majority of the time people respond to the post. Or maybe I'm naive and like to think people operate in a similar way to me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with Nora, and I agree with Coyote. And I agree with RB and Kanaka. Does that mean I wanna fuck them? Just checking... cos I may need to re-evaluate some shiz if it does. Also... I now have an earworm https://youtu.be/VBmMU_iwe6U You're welcome.if u agreed before you saw their post no but if just saying they argument sways you then subconscious maybe as you abandoned previous beliefs all on bassist that hot people said different Not even a little bit. I would never say that what you are claiming doesnt happen, of course it does. People want to have things in common with those they find attractive. And some people take that a step further (or a giant leap) and are obsequious and sycophantic towards those they find attractive, as they think it'll get them noticed by or make them more attractive to that person. But mostly what I see is people who have similar views on things agreeing with each other on those things, and those same people disagreeing on the things they disagree on.true thats why I said if you changed your belief solely on the fact you read what they said not because you had that prior existing beliefs this are two different scenarios " But you have no way of knowing what I'm thinking. I could have changed my belief based on who the posters were that I mentioned. What happens is when the reader sees that people are agreeing with each other, they look at that through their own veil of bias and decide the reasons behind it for themselves, and react accordingly. We all do it, no one reads something without some level of bias, it's what you do with that bias that matters. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Boys - win Girls - in the bin The mr There’s only one way to sort this out. FIIIIIIIIIGHT! Boys - champs Girls - pants. Done, thanks for coming. The mr What are little boys made of? Frogs and snails, And puppy-dogs' tails; That's what little boys are made of. What are little girls made of? What are little girls made of? Sugar and spice, And all that's nice; That's what little girls are made of. What are CDs made of? False lashes and a wig; And a bulge that's too big. That's what CDs are made of. ...how did you know it was a wig? " Well, I wear one... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Boys - win Girls - in the bin The mr There’s only one way to sort this out. FIIIIIIIIIGHT! Boys - champs Girls - pants. Done, thanks for coming. The mr What are little boys made of? Frogs and snails, And puppy-dogs' tails; That's what little boys are made of. What are little girls made of? What are little girls made of? Sugar and spice, And all that's nice; That's what little girls are made of. What are CDs made of? False lashes and a wig; And a bulge that's too big. That's what CDs are made of. ...how did you know it was a wig? Well, I wear one... " That's cool, we should swap one day and see if anyone notices, hope you don't take this message in an overly-simplified judgement of my behaviour towards other people purely based on my gender, I just want better hair. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I agree with everything her with the tits said. Everyone else is wrong." exactly my point | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Let's be honest, most people are indifferent to us. We don't really have that *much* of an impact on the vast majority of forum users, even if we like to think that people love/hate us. Majority of the time people respond to the post. Or maybe I'm naive and like to think people operate in a similar way to me. " I think that there is a level of naivety in what you say. The levels of sycophancy on here at times is huge Or am I just being a cynic. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Interesting post. Let me explain how dis shit works. I look at the content and if it interests me enough I respond, whomever it is. Whether I agree or disagree. Now there's two things that can happen from there. (1) I notice I consistently like someone's views. Then I'll check you out. (2) We have an exchange that seems cool to me. Then I'll check you out. You have to get to know me before I want to get in your knickers and even if I do I'll still challenge you if I disagree. If you don't like that you aren't for me. No matter how hot your ass is. Here endeth the lesson." thank you....... Noted | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Let's be honest, most people are indifferent to us. We don't really have that *much* of an impact on the vast majority of forum users, even if we like to think that people love/hate us. Majority of the time people respond to the post. Or maybe I'm naive and like to think people operate in a similar way to me. I think that there is a level of naivety in what you say. The levels of sycophancy on here at times is huge Or am I just being a cynic. " Oh; there definitely can be sometimes! My first post said as much. Maybe I want your cock and that's why I'm agreeing with you. But I also think... it's not just simping. There's so much more to it and it's like what NSP said about bias. Our confirmation bias means we're far more likely to see that which supports our views and more likely to ignore those interactions that don't. I'd like to give the majority of men the benefit of doubt. If they're choosing to agree with me, it's because they agree with what I'm typing not my HHs. Besides, I like being challenged. I'm far more likely to pay attention to someone who can eloquently disagree with me without relying on ad hominem attacks and respectfully explains their viewpoint. I like learning, having my ideas challenged. Opening my eyes to different perspectives. There's definitely a smidgen of naivety though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does no one see the irony of, in some cases, the same people bashing ‘white knighting’ are the very same who have been guilty of it in the past ? " Why are you called revolver incidentally is it because you love to twirl? Or because you are an American lost in Paris? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yep mostly. I don’t like those guys though. I like the few and far between ones who will say how they feel without worrying about upsetting all the hot ones because they don’t agree. There’s a few on here but not many. What a load of old twaddle " Very witty! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? " In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. A | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Birds of a feather stick together. " ^Doreen | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yep mostly. I don’t like those guys though. I like the few and far between ones who will say how they feel without worrying about upsetting all the hot ones because they don’t agree. There’s a few on here but not many. This. Majority of the guys on here just simp over every woman, have an actual opinion!! Women only get away with what they do as men don't want to risk upsetting anyone. Sex is on the cards here! " But is sex on the cards really? In the majority of cases the "white knights" are the sort that wouldn't ever emerge from behind their keyboard and the ones that just fish for compliments and attention aren't actually meeting anyone either. I'd probably say that sex is in fact the very last thing on the cards | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Interesting post. Let me explain how dis shit works. I look at the content and if it interests me enough I respond, whomever it is. Whether I agree or disagree. Now there's two things that can happen from there. (1) I notice I consistently like someone's views. Then I'll check you out. (2) We have an exchange that seems cool to me. Then I'll check you out. You have to get to know me before I want to get in your knickers and even if I do I'll still challenge you if I disagree. If you don't like that you aren't for me. No matter how hot your ass is. Here endeth the lesson.thank you....... Noted " Love you too bro | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Birds of a feather stick together. ^Doreen" I'm more like Sharon. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? " No | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No, the clique rules the forums " Cliques are for the fragile. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yep mostly. I don’t like those guys though. I like the few and far between ones who will say how they feel without worrying about upsetting all the hot ones because they don’t agree. There’s a few on here but not many. This. Majority of the guys on here just simp over every woman, have an actual opinion!! Women only get away with what they do as men don't want to risk upsetting anyone. Sex is on the cards here! But is sex on the cards really? In the majority of cases the "white knights" are the sort that wouldn't ever emerge from behind their keyboard and the ones that just fish for compliments and attention aren't actually meeting anyone either. I'd probably say that sex is in fact the very last thing on the cards " Maybe hoping to get access to the private gallery. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yeah it’s usually the woman here to get a response and the guys get blanked. One thing I really don’t like is those “rate the profile above” or “snog, fuck, drinks or avoid the person above”. The guy always gets missed. It sucks " The games are just a little bit of fun even though some spoil it by post jumping like 15 minutes later it just shows IQ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Absolutely. There are several forum characters who get away with standards of behaviour and snark against others that single male profiles will never be able to, simply because they're female or they're a couple account with the male partner being a right miserable disagreeable character and the female partner's sexy pictures plastered on their combined profile providing him social cover. There have been more than one couple account where I've really had to fight the urge to put them on full blast publicly and basically tell them to have the male half make his own single profile and see if he can get away with being a dick to others online without hot pictures of his female half being a distraction/sweetener. There. I've said it. This is not the only adult forum I've been active in all my life. The general trend I notice is that let any adult forum last long enough and the dynamic will inexorably swing towards the notion that "women are always right, women are queens to be put on pedestals". And many women hate it when some men like myself don't buy into this mentality, don't blindly idolise and simp for women just to get a chance at fucking them, and don't put them on a pedestal simply because single women are statistically speaking the smallest part of the swinging community. " hear hear | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well since it's always guys whom seem to make a post then gets flooded with women make what you like out of this I'm just going to sit on the fence " bit painful if its a feathered edge | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Interesting post. Let me explain how dis shit works. I look at the content and if it interests me enough I respond, whomever it is. Whether I agree or disagree. Now there's two things that can happen from there. (1) I notice I consistently like someone's views. Then I'll check you out. (2) We have an exchange that seems cool to me. Then I'll check you out. You have to get to know me before I want to get in your knickers and even if I do I'll still challenge you if I disagree. If you don't like that you aren't for me. No matter how hot your ass is. Here endeth the lesson.thank you....... Noted Love you too bro" my pleasure | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. A" theirs got to be a pecking order surely | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Absolutely. There are several forum characters who get away with standards of behaviour and snark against others that single male profiles will never be able to, simply because they're female or they're a couple account with the male partner being a right miserable disagreeable character and the female partner's sexy pictures plastered on their combined profile providing him social cover. There have been more than one couple account where I've really had to fight the urge to put them on full blast publicly and basically tell them to have the male half make his own single profile and see if he can get away with being a dick to others online without hot pictures of his female half being a distraction/sweetener. There. I've said it. This is not the only adult forum I've been active in all my life. The general trend I notice is that let any adult forum last long enough and the dynamic will inexorably swing towards the notion that "women are always right, women are queens to be put on pedestals". And many women hate it when some men like myself don't buy into this mentality, don't blindly idolise and simp for women just to get a chance at fucking them, and don't put them on a pedestal simply because single women are statistically speaking the smallest part of the swinging community. " Tea anyone? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. Atheirs got to be a pecking order surely " There are none so blind to the pecking order than those who actively benefit the most from it. That profile you're responding to is one of those examples. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. Atheirs got to be a pecking order surely There are none so blind to the pecking order than those who actively benefit the most from it. That profile you're responding to is one of those examples. " ahhh get you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do you not know that Queen wrote a song about it!? " We are the champions, we are the champions my friend | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Absolutely. There are several forum characters who get away with standards of behaviour and snark against others that single male profiles will never be able to, simply because they're female or they're a couple account with the male partner being a right miserable disagreeable character and the female partner's sexy pictures plastered on their combined profile providing him social cover. There have been more than one couple account where I've really had to fight the urge to put them on full blast publicly and basically tell them to have the male half make his own single profile and see if he can get away with being a dick to others online without hot pictures of his female half being a distraction/sweetener. There. I've said it. This is not the only adult forum I've been active in all my life. The general trend I notice is that let any adult forum last long enough and the dynamic will inexorably swing towards the notion that "women are always right, women are queens to be put on pedestals". And many women hate it when some men like myself don't buy into this mentality, don't blindly idolise and simp for women just to get a chance at fucking them, and don't put them on a pedestal simply because single women are statistically speaking the smallest part of the swinging community. " Wow. There's some anger and dislike embedded in that response and it's not towards simping men. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Absolutely. There are several forum characters who get away with standards of behaviour and snark against others that single male profiles will never be able to, simply because they're female or they're a couple account with the male partner being a right miserable disagreeable character and the female partner's sexy pictures plastered on their combined profile providing him social cover. There have been more than one couple account where I've really had to fight the urge to put them on full blast publicly and basically tell them to have the male half make his own single profile and see if he can get away with being a dick to others online without hot pictures of his female half being a distraction/sweetener. There. I've said it. This is not the only adult forum I've been active in all my life. The general trend I notice is that let any adult forum last long enough and the dynamic will inexorably swing towards the notion that "women are always right, women are queens to be put on pedestals". And many women hate it when some men like myself don't buy into this mentality, don't blindly idolise and simp for women just to get a chance at fucking them, and don't put them on a pedestal simply because single women are statistically speaking the smallest part of the swinging community. " There are many threads like that but also many more that are not. Quite a lot of this forum is inane activity to consume the time of the clinically bored but you get that on every forum regardless of topic/genre. The cliques that are talked about generally post in each others threads as they do in any forum or social environment and various groups form with similar interests. Find where you fit or create your own group by posting consistent content - that's how it all works really isn't it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Of course woman rule the forum, they have the pussy they make the rules " thankyou see knew i was right | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yep mostly. I don’t like those guys though. I like the few and far between ones who will say how they feel without worrying about upsetting all the hot ones because they don’t agree. There’s a few on here but not many. This. Majority of the guys on here just simp over every woman, have an actual opinion!! Women only get away with what they do as men don't want to risk upsetting anyone. Sex is on the cards here! " Simping isn't a good look | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do you not know that Queen wrote a song about it!? " Big bottomed girls? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yep mostly. I don’t like those guys though. I like the few and far between ones who will say how they feel without worrying about upsetting all the hot ones because they don’t agree. There’s a few on here but not many. This. Majority of the guys on here just simp over every woman, have an actual opinion!! Women only get away with what they do as men don't want to risk upsetting anyone. Sex is on the cards here! " ------------------------ This | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Yep mostly. I don’t like those guys though. I like the few and far between ones who will say how they feel without worrying about upsetting all the hot ones because they don’t agree. There’s a few on here but not many. This. Majority of the guys on here just simp over every woman, have an actual opinion!! Women only get away with what they do as men don't want to risk upsetting anyone. Sex is on the cards here! ------------------------ This " wheres your pic cmon man put a pic up anything is better than a blank avatar | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. Atheirs got to be a pecking order surely " Why? If you want to put yourself above/below others then that only works in your head. If you view everyone as equal regardless of age, looks, gender, sexuality etc then they are. The only times I've ever considered anyone anything other than equal to everyone else on site is when they've displayed toxic attitudes, sexist/racist/phobic opinions, generally portrayed themselves as a muppet through their online behaviour or chucked childish tantrums when others have disagreed with them in posts and threads. But even then, that's just my opinion of someone and others will differ. My views are my own and only valid to me. If people agree? Great. If they don't that's their prerogative. It's an individuals conscious choice to see themselves as above or below others. There is no pecking order unless you allow it. Sadly many do so in the hope it gets them laid. But then that's on them and if it creates a view I their head that there are some kind of leagues, cliques or Fab illuminati then they need to give themselves a slap and their heads a wobble. You make your own choices on here and in life. Nobody does it for you. A | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. Atheirs got to be a pecking order surely Why? If you want to put yourself above/below others then that only works in your head. If you view everyone as equal regardless of age, looks, gender, sexuality etc then they are. The only times I've ever considered anyone anything other than equal to everyone else on site is when they've displayed toxic attitudes, sexist/racist/phobic opinions, generally portrayed themselves as a muppet through their online behaviour or chucked childish tantrums when others have disagreed with them in posts and threads. But even then, that's just my opinion of someone and others will differ. My views are my own and only valid to me. If people agree? Great. If they don't that's their prerogative. It's an individuals conscious choice to see themselves as above or below others. There is no pecking order unless you allow it. Sadly many do so in the hope it gets them laid. But then that's on them and if it creates a view I their head that there are some kind of leagues, cliques or Fab illuminati then they need to give themselves a slap and their heads a wobble. You make your own choices on here and in life. Nobody does it for you. A" Indeed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. Atheirs got to be a pecking order surely Why? If you want to put yourself above/below others then that only works in your head. If you view everyone as equal regardless of age, looks, gender, sexuality etc then they are. The only times I've ever considered anyone anything other than equal to everyone else on site is when they've displayed toxic attitudes, sexist/racist/phobic opinions, generally portrayed themselves as a muppet through their online behaviour or chucked childish tantrums when others have disagreed with them in posts and threads. But even then, that's just my opinion of someone and others will differ. My views are my own and only valid to me. If people agree? Great. If they don't that's their prerogative. It's an individuals conscious choice to see themselves as above or below others. There is no pecking order unless you allow it. Sadly many do so in the hope it gets them laid. But then that's on them and if it creates a view I their head that there are some kind of leagues, cliques or Fab illuminati then they need to give themselves a slap and their heads a wobble. You make your own choices on here and in life. Nobody does it for you. A" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Absolutely. There are several forum characters who get away with standards of behaviour and snark against others that single male profiles will never be able to, simply because they're female or they're a couple account with the male partner being a right miserable disagreeable character and the female partner's sexy pictures plastered on their combined profile providing him social cover. There have been more than one couple account where I've really had to fight the urge to put them on full blast publicly and basically tell them to have the male half make his own single profile and see if he can get away with being a dick to others online without hot pictures of his female half being a distraction/sweetener. There. I've said it. This is not the only adult forum I've been active in all my life. The general trend I notice is that let any adult forum last long enough and the dynamic will inexorably swing towards the notion that "women are always right, women are queens to be put on pedestals". And many women hate it when some men like myself don't buy into this mentality, don't blindly idolise and simp for women just to get a chance at fucking them, and don't put them on a pedestal simply because single women are statistically speaking the smallest part of the swinging community. Wow. There's some anger and dislike embedded in that response and it's not towards simping men. " So who do you think I'm directing my ire against? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Absolutely. There are several forum characters who get away with standards of behaviour and snark against others that single male profiles will never be able to, simply because they're female or they're a couple account with the male partner being a right miserable disagreeable character and the female partner's sexy pictures plastered on their combined profile providing him social cover. There have been more than one couple account where I've really had to fight the urge to put them on full blast publicly and basically tell them to have the male half make his own single profile and see if he can get away with being a dick to others online without hot pictures of his female half being a distraction/sweetener. There. I've said it. This is not the only adult forum I've been active in all my life. The general trend I notice is that let any adult forum last long enough and the dynamic will inexorably swing towards the notion that "women are always right, women are queens to be put on pedestals". And many women hate it when some men like myself don't buy into this mentality, don't blindly idolise and simp for women just to get a chance at fucking them, and don't put them on a pedestal simply because single women are statistically speaking the smallest part of the swinging community. " One thing I've noticed is that actually many of the women in this forum actively dislike it, and quite vocally, when they're put on a pedestal. I think maybe you should consider what I said about bias, because it seems as if you're looking to have yours confirmed when you read and reply to threads. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Absolutely. There are several forum characters who get away with standards of behaviour and snark against others that single male profiles will never be able to, simply because they're female or they're a couple account with the male partner being a right miserable disagreeable character and the female partner's sexy pictures plastered on their combined profile providing him social cover. There have been more than one couple account where I've really had to fight the urge to put them on full blast publicly and basically tell them to have the male half make his own single profile and see if he can get away with being a dick to others online without hot pictures of his female half being a distraction/sweetener. There. I've said it. This is not the only adult forum I've been active in all my life. The general trend I notice is that let any adult forum last long enough and the dynamic will inexorably swing towards the notion that "women are always right, women are queens to be put on pedestals". And many women hate it when some men like myself don't buy into this mentality, don't blindly idolise and simp for women just to get a chance at fucking them, and don't put them on a pedestal simply because single women are statistically speaking the smallest part of the swinging community. Wow. There's some anger and dislike embedded in that response and it's not towards simping men. So who do you think I'm directing my ire against? " Women. You don't like women. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well since it's always guys whom seem to make a post then gets flooded with women make what you like out of this I'm just going to sit on the fence bit painful if its a feathered edge " I won't be sitting the whole duration | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. Atheirs got to be a pecking order surely Why? If you want to put yourself above/below others then that only works in your head. If you view everyone as equal regardless of age, looks, gender, sexuality etc then they are. The only times I've ever considered anyone anything other than equal to everyone else on site is when they've displayed toxic attitudes, sexist/racist/phobic opinions, generally portrayed themselves as a muppet through their online behaviour or chucked childish tantrums when others have disagreed with them in posts and threads. But even then, that's just my opinion of someone and others will differ. My views are my own and only valid to me. If people agree? Great. If they don't that's their prerogative. It's an individuals conscious choice to see themselves as above or below others. There is no pecking order unless you allow it. Sadly many do so in the hope it gets them laid. But then that's on them and if it creates a view I their head that there are some kind of leagues, cliques or Fab illuminati then they need to give themselves a slap and their heads a wobble. You make your own choices on here and in life. Nobody does it for you. A" but their is a pecking order is that what you're saying? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Absolutely. There are several forum characters who get away with standards of behaviour and snark against others that single male profiles will never be able to, simply because they're female or they're a couple account with the male partner being a right miserable disagreeable character and the female partner's sexy pictures plastered on their combined profile providing him social cover. There have been more than one couple account where I've really had to fight the urge to put them on full blast publicly and basically tell them to have the male half make his own single profile and see if he can get away with being a dick to others online without hot pictures of his female half being a distraction/sweetener. There. I've said it. This is not the only adult forum I've been active in all my life. The general trend I notice is that let any adult forum last long enough and the dynamic will inexorably swing towards the notion that "women are always right, women are queens to be put on pedestals". And many women hate it when some men like myself don't buy into this mentality, don't blindly idolise and simp for women just to get a chance at fucking them, and don't put them on a pedestal simply because single women are statistically speaking the smallest part of the swinging community. One thing I've noticed is that actually many of the women in this forum actively dislike it, and quite vocally, when they're put on a pedestal. I think maybe you should consider what I said about bias, because it seems as if you're looking to have yours confirmed when you read and reply to threads." I bloody hate it. And it totally puts me off someone. (As I’ve already said above somewhere) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well since it's always guys whom seem to make a post then gets flooded with women make what you like out of this I'm just going to sit on the fence bit painful if its a feathered edge I won't be sitting the whole duration " good let the blood get to your feet | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. Atheirs got to be a pecking order surely There are none so blind to the pecking order than those who actively benefit the most from it. That profile you're responding to is one of those examples. ahhh get you " Am I to take it from this comment that the request made the other week not to engage with you has been withdrawn or is it just going to be the case that you'll sneak the odd dig in as and when you choose? I'm happy either way, but you did request no engagement at all and even had a forum mod clarify that...... A | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As long as the cogs, wheels and gears of my Love Wagon are lubricated frequently, then I'm more than happy to capitulate to any woman on this forå. They can reign supreme for all I care. " Love Wagon. Oh my. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"More like the clique rule. It's not that gender bias" well yes when you talk about cliques their are cliques? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also, looking at some of the latest replies, I see the usual suspects of the clique flooding in to defend their corner now. " Who would be in this clique? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Only ever said what I believe. I occasionally temper it with empathy but I find it impossible to be untrue to myself. I have always been unpopular for my direct nature, I don't see why it should be different here. " This is pretty much where I am. I just don't give a fuck. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. Atheirs got to be a pecking order surely Why? If you want to put yourself above/below others then that only works in your head. If you view everyone as equal regardless of age, looks, gender, sexuality etc then they are. The only times I've ever considered anyone anything other than equal to everyone else on site is when they've displayed toxic attitudes, sexist/racist/phobic opinions, generally portrayed themselves as a muppet through their online behaviour or chucked childish tantrums when others have disagreed with them in posts and threads. But even then, that's just my opinion of someone and others will differ. My views are my own and only valid to me. If people agree? Great. If they don't that's their prerogative. It's an individuals conscious choice to see themselves as above or below others. There is no pecking order unless you allow it. Sadly many do so in the hope it gets them laid. But then that's on them and if it creates a view I their head that there are some kind of leagues, cliques or Fab illuminati then they need to give themselves a slap and their heads a wobble. You make your own choices on here and in life. Nobody does it for you. A" Nicely put | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. Atheirs got to be a pecking order surely There are none so blind to the pecking order than those who actively benefit the most from it. That profile you're responding to is one of those examples. ahhh get you Am I to take it from this comment that the request made the other week not to engage with you has been withdrawn or is it just going to be the case that you'll sneak the odd dig in as and when you choose? I'm happy either way, but you did request no engagement at all and even had a forum mod clarify that...... A" Not sure i know what you are talking about here? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. Atheirs got to be a pecking order surely There are none so blind to the pecking order than those who actively benefit the most from it. That profile you're responding to is one of those examples. ahhh get you Am I to take it from this comment that the request made the other week not to engage with you has been withdrawn or is it just going to be the case that you'll sneak the odd dig in as and when you choose? I'm happy either way, but you did request no engagement at all and even had a forum mod clarify that...... ANot sure i know what you are talking about here? " It wasn't aimed at you. The poster you replied to requested that I avoid engaging with them the other week which I agreed to do happily. Seems it doesn't work both ways though..... A | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. Atheirs got to be a pecking order surely There are none so blind to the pecking order than those who actively benefit the most from it. That profile you're responding to is one of those examples. ahhh get you Am I to take it from this comment that the request made the other week not to engage with you has been withdrawn or is it just going to be the case that you'll sneak the odd dig in as and when you choose? I'm happy either way, but you did request no engagement at all and even had a forum mod clarify that...... ANot sure i know what you are talking about here? It wasn't aimed at you. The poster you replied to requested that I avoid engaging with them the other week which I agreed to do happily. Seems it doesn't work both ways though..... A" ahhhh ok | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Absolutely. There are several forum characters who get away with standards of behaviour and snark against others that single male profiles will never be able to, simply because they're female or they're a couple account with the male partner being a right miserable disagreeable character and the female partner's sexy pictures plastered on their combined profile providing him social cover. There have been more than one couple account where I've really had to fight the urge to put them on full blast publicly and basically tell them to have the male half make his own single profile and see if he can get away with being a dick to others online without hot pictures of his female half being a distraction/sweetener. There. I've said it. This is not the only adult forum I've been active in all my life. The general trend I notice is that let any adult forum last long enough and the dynamic will inexorably swing towards the notion that "women are always right, women are queens to be put on pedestals". And many women hate it when some men like myself don't buy into this mentality, don't blindly idolise and simp for women just to get a chance at fucking them, and don't put them on a pedestal simply because single women are statistically speaking the smallest part of the swinging community. Wow. There's some anger and dislike embedded in that response and it's not towards simping men. So who do you think I'm directing my ire against? Women. You don't like women." Costs me nothing to say that you're wrong. If I don't like women, I can take myself off to FabGuys and not stay on here. I'm not some new account with little to no verifications on here trying to get a rise out of hating women on Fab. Try again. I absolutely do not "not like" women as a collective entity. What I don't like is women who leverage on the knowledge that they're hot enough to get away with a lot of things online or in real life, do nothing to dissuade others from putting them on a pedestal and building them a larger-than-life profile on Fab, or single males hiding behind pictures of their girlfriends or wives on their couple profiles. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? In three words? Do they fuck....... Nobody rules anything on here and there's no pecking order to anything - meets, the forums, messages or whatever, and no leagues that anyone is in or out of. If you think there is then that's because you yourself enable it. Atheirs got to be a pecking order surely There are none so blind to the pecking order than those who actively benefit the most from it. That profile you're responding to is one of those examples. ahhh get you Am I to take it from this comment that the request made the other week not to engage with you has been withdrawn or is it just going to be the case that you'll sneak the odd dig in as and when you choose? I'm happy either way, but you did request no engagement at all and even had a forum mod clarify that...... ANot sure i know what you are talking about here? It wasn't aimed at you. The poster you replied to requested that I avoid engaging with them the other week which I agreed to do happily. Seems it doesn't work both ways though..... A" I've not engaged with you directly, I've lifted nothing against you. Don't act like you haven't been getting sly digs in against me in your other comments. Don't think I haven't forgotten how you killed my other thread by openly telling the mods that you disagreed with their interpretation of how blocks and disengagement declarations should work. Everyone here who knows how to read between the lines knows full well who you're gunning for. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think it’s good that women rule somewhere x let us have this lol" lol cmon you secretly rule the world anyway | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Absolutely. There are several forum characters who get away with standards of behaviour and snark against others that single male profiles will never be able to, simply because they're female or they're a couple account with the male partner being a right miserable disagreeable character and the female partner's sexy pictures plastered on their combined profile providing him social cover. There have been more than one couple account where I've really had to fight the urge to put them on full blast publicly and basically tell them to have the male half make his own single profile and see if he can get away with being a dick to others online without hot pictures of his female half being a distraction/sweetener. There. I've said it. This is not the only adult forum I've been active in all my life. The general trend I notice is that let any adult forum last long enough and the dynamic will inexorably swing towards the notion that "women are always right, women are queens to be put on pedestals". And many women hate it when some men like myself don't buy into this mentality, don't blindly idolise and simp for women just to get a chance at fucking them, and don't put them on a pedestal simply because single women are statistically speaking the smallest part of the swinging community. Wow. There's some anger and dislike embedded in that response and it's not towards simping men. So who do you think I'm directing my ire against? Women. You don't like women. Costs me nothing to say that you're wrong. If I don't like women, I can take myself off to FabGuys and not stay on here. I'm not some new account with little to no verifications on here trying to get a rise out of hating women on Fab. Try again. I absolutely do not "not like" women as a collective entity. What I don't like is women who leverage on the knowledge that they're hot enough to get away with a lot of things online or in real life, do nothing to dissuade others from putting them on a pedestal and building them a larger-than-life profile on Fab, or single males hiding behind pictures of their girlfriends or wives on their couple profiles. " I don't care if you're new or not. Or have veris or no. As you say, it costs me nothing to say you're wrong. Nor is my opinion based on one thread. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think it’s good that women rule somewhere x let us have this lollol cmon you secretly rule the world anyway " Are you sucking up to me because you like my boobs lol? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also, looking at some of the latest replies, I see the usual suspects of the clique flooding in to defend their corner now. Who would be in this clique?" I'm clearly not going to name names. It's against forum rules don't you know? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think it’s good that women rule somewhere x let us have this lollol cmon you secretly rule the world anyway Are you sucking up to me because you like my boobs lol?" lol no omg they're big i mean beautiful i mean naked | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Absolutely. There are several forum characters who get away with standards of behaviour and snark against others that single male profiles will never be able to, simply because they're female or they're a couple account with the male partner being a right miserable disagreeable character and the female partner's sexy pictures plastered on their combined profile providing him social cover. There have been more than one couple account where I've really had to fight the urge to put them on full blast publicly and basically tell them to have the male half make his own single profile and see if he can get away with being a dick to others online without hot pictures of his female half being a distraction/sweetener. There. I've said it. This is not the only adult forum I've been active in all my life. The general trend I notice is that let any adult forum last long enough and the dynamic will inexorably swing towards the notion that "women are always right, women are queens to be put on pedestals". And many women hate it when some men like myself don't buy into this mentality, don't blindly idolise and simp for women just to get a chance at fucking them, and don't put them on a pedestal simply because single women are statistically speaking the smallest part of the swinging community. Wow. There's some anger and dislike embedded in that response and it's not towards simping men. So who do you think I'm directing my ire against? Women. You don't like women. Costs me nothing to say that you're wrong. If I don't like women, I can take myself off to FabGuys and not stay on here. I'm not some new account with little to no verifications on here trying to get a rise out of hating women on Fab. Try again. I absolutely do not "not like" women as a collective entity. What I don't like is women who leverage on the knowledge that they're hot enough to get away with a lot of things online or in real life, do nothing to dissuade others from putting them on a pedestal and building them a larger-than-life profile on Fab, or single males hiding behind pictures of their girlfriends or wives on their couple profiles. I don't care if you're new or not. Or have veris or no. As you say, it costs me nothing to say you're wrong. Nor is my opinion based on one thread. " "My views are my own and only valid to me. If people agree? Great. If they don't that's their prerogative." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? " I agree with people if I agree with them, not because I'm attracted to them. I'd say yes sometimes that's how it is but shouldn't assume because a guy is agreeing with a woman that it's just because he likes her. I'm more than happy to disagree with people I like if don't share same view. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think what the majority think as I’m not important enough to have an opinion. , if that’s ok with everyone? " you're important to me | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think what the majority think as I’m not important enough to have an opinion. , if that’s ok with everyone? you're important to me " So kind…. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" What I don't like is women who leverage on the knowledge that they're hot enough to get away with a lot of things online or in real life, do nothing to dissuade others from putting them on a pedestal and building them a larger-than-life profile on Fab, or single males hiding behind pictures of their girlfriends or wives on their couple profiles. " I absolutely don't like women who do that either. There have been some really excellent examples of that here in the past, but not for quite some time. And single males who hide behind sexy pics of a woman on a couple profile should be reported, if they aren't actually a couple. But everyone here is entitled to speak their opinion and have a view, as long as they don't break forum rules. Just because certain people have been here a while, post on a lot of threads and agree with people who they share opinions with doesn't mean they're in a clique though. They might not even know the people they agree with. They may have never shared anything but a public forum interaction. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This got a bit anti didn't it Shoulda had me popcorn ready " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also, looking at some of the latest replies, I see the usual suspects of the clique flooding in to defend their corner now. Who would be in this clique? I'm clearly not going to name names. It's against forum rules don't you know? " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" What I don't like is women who leverage on the knowledge that they're hot enough to get away with a lot of things online or in real life, do nothing to dissuade others from putting them on a pedestal and building them a larger-than-life profile on Fab, or single males hiding behind pictures of their girlfriends or wives on their couple profiles. I absolutely don't like women who do that either. There have been some really excellent examples of that here in the past, but not for quite some time. And single males who hide behind sexy pics of a woman on a couple profile should be reported, if they aren't actually a couple. But everyone here is entitled to speak their opinion and have a view, as long as they don't break forum rules. Just because certain people have been here a while, post on a lot of threads and agree with people who they share opinions with doesn't mean they're in a clique though. They might not even know the people they agree with. They may have never shared anything but a public forum interaction." Am I allowed to agree with this or will it been seen as a Posh/Nora clique | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Just because certain people have been here a while, post on a lot of threads and agree with people who they share opinions with doesn't mean they're in a clique though. They might not even know the people they agree with. They may have never shared anything but a public forum interaction." All due respect, what you describe is literally one of the defining factors of a clique though. Doesn't matter if they know the people they agree with in real life, as long as they think they know the people they agree with online. It's very obvious when you see in certain threads how when a certain user comments, within the next few new comments another profile who is well known in the forums as "one of the same" with them also chimes in and agrees with them/says similar stuff as them. When it happens once or twice, fine maybe it's coincidence. More than that? I don't believe its organic engagement and more like attempts at astroturfing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? " Occasionally, yes. It would be folly to disagree there are people contributing to forum threads that don’t have an ulterior motive. However, I don’t think there is a simple answer to this, as illustrated by all the posts above (especially the ones with the tits phwoaarrr!!). When you’re dealing with so many people of differing age/gender/preference/experience it is impossible to pigeon hole folk purely based on a post or two. Not least because we have friends in here. When I first started posting last year, I knew no one. My posts were personal and true to me but not affected by any online relationships. Now I’m friends with a few people. As Posh said above (great tits btw, Posh, FAF?), we’re probably friends because we agree on many things and have a similar outlook. Therefore, it may look to others as though we’re ‘simping’ when, in fact, we are stating our opinion and, as is often the case, we match our friends’ opinions. There are many women with whom I do not agree on the forums and I will say so if it’s relevant. What I won’t do is argue for the sake of it or blow smoke. I might publicly appreciate a comment, especially if it’s my thread. I engage with people of all genders, ages and preferences purely in the pursuit of good chat. I come to the forums for the social aspect and thoroughly enjoy it. I’ve also had my fair share of support from women/couples/trans agreeing or supporting me. So, in summary, yes but no. As it happens, I also dislike this kind of gender imbalance negativity. It’s not wrong to debate stuff, but opinion is just that. I don’t think it’s fair or right to generalise based on gender. This forum is what we make it. We own the agenda here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Just because certain people have been here a while, post on a lot of threads and agree with people who they share opinions with doesn't mean they're in a clique though. They might not even know the people they agree with. They may have never shared anything but a public forum interaction. All due respect, what you describe is literally one of the defining factors of a clique though. Doesn't matter if they know the people they agree with in real life, as long as they think they know the people they agree with online. It's very obvious when you see in certain threads how when a certain user comments, within the next few new comments another profile who is well known in the forums as "one of the same" with them also chimes in and agrees with them/says similar stuff as them. When it happens once or twice, fine maybe it's coincidence. More than that? I don't believe its organic engagement and more like attempts at astroturfing. " Something tells me you don't know how to be social | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Just because certain people have been here a while, post on a lot of threads and agree with people who they share opinions with doesn't mean they're in a clique though. They might not even know the people they agree with. They may have never shared anything but a public forum interaction. All due respect, what you describe is literally one of the defining factors of a clique though. Doesn't matter if they know the people they agree with in real life, as long as they think they know the people they agree with online. It's very obvious when you see in certain threads how when a certain user comments, within the next few new comments another profile who is well known in the forums as "one of the same" with them also chimes in and agrees with them/says similar stuff as them. When it happens once or twice, fine maybe it's coincidence. More than that? I don't believe its organic engagement and more like attempts at astroturfing. " Is there not a possibility that those people just happen to be online and have an interest in commenting on the same kinds of things? Is it not at all possible that you're looking for that to be the case due to your bias? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if a woman disagrees with a threads context and really gets her teeth into it and then the guys who are attracted to that woman add their tuppence worth to try and gain favour and back her up, is this the forum, well is it? Occasionally, yes. It would be folly to disagree there are people contributing to forum threads that don’t have an ulterior motive. However, I don’t think there is a simple answer to this, as illustrated by all the posts above (especially the ones with the tits phwoaarrr!!). When you’re dealing with so many people of differing age/gender/preference/experience it is impossible to pigeon hole folk purely based on a post or two. Not least because we have friends in here. When I first started posting last year, I knew no one. My posts were personal and true to me but not affected by any online relationships. Now I’m friends with a few people. As Posh said above (great tits btw, Posh, FAF?), we’re probably friends because we agree on many things and have a similar outlook. Therefore, it may look to others as though we’re ‘simping’ when, in fact, we are stating our opinion and, as is often the case, we match our friends’ opinions. There are many women with whom I do not agree on the forums and I will say so if it’s relevant. What I won’t do is argue for the sake of it or blow smoke. I might publicly appreciate a comment, especially if it’s my thread. I engage with people of all genders, ages and preferences purely in the pursuit of good chat. I come to the forums for the social aspect and thoroughly enjoy it. I’ve also had my fair share of support from women/couples/trans agreeing or supporting me. So, in summary, yes but no. As it happens, I also dislike this kind of gender imbalance negativity. It’s not wrong to debate stuff, but opinion is just that. I don’t think it’s fair or right to generalise based on gender. This forum is what we make it. We own the agenda here." I don't think the "agenda" here is something that's equally owned by all regardless of whether they're male, female, couples, or trans. That was the point that the OP was making with the title of this thread, "Do Women Rule The Forums". | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Just because certain people have been here a while, post on a lot of threads and agree with people who they share opinions with doesn't mean they're in a clique though. They might not even know the people they agree with. They may have never shared anything but a public forum interaction. All due respect, what you describe is literally one of the defining factors of a clique though. Doesn't matter if they know the people they agree with in real life, as long as they think they know the people they agree with online. It's very obvious when you see in certain threads how when a certain user comments, within the next few new comments another profile who is well known in the forums as "one of the same" with them also chimes in and agrees with them/says similar stuff as them. When it happens once or twice, fine maybe it's coincidence. More than that? I don't believe its organic engagement and more like attempts at astroturfing. Is there not a possibility that those people just happen to be online and have an interest in commenting on the same kinds of things? Is it not at all possible that you're looking for that to be the case due to your bias?" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Personally I pay hardly any attention to it anymore. But yes some guys will say things to gain favour. But then on other threads will trip themselves up. Usually when doing the same thing to another woman. It's amusing. I just post wherever. Don't care who posted what and don't really pay attention enough to note it either. The bit you don't see though is how many DM's the guys will send replying privately to a thread comment. " That's why you caught my attention. Plus you challenged me with some good advice. And you break taboos with comments like that about the DMs. I'll show you admiration in forums. If that's seen as something else, by other people that's their issue. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Just because certain people have been here a while, post on a lot of threads and agree with people who they share opinions with doesn't mean they're in a clique though. They might not even know the people they agree with. They may have never shared anything but a public forum interaction. All due respect, what you describe is literally one of the defining factors of a clique though. Doesn't matter if they know the people they agree with in real life, as long as they think they know the people they agree with online. It's very obvious when you see in certain threads how when a certain user comments, within the next few new comments another profile who is well known in the forums as "one of the same" with them also chimes in and agrees with them/says similar stuff as them. When it happens once or twice, fine maybe it's coincidence. More than that? I don't believe its organic engagement and more like attempts at astroturfing. Something tells me you don't know how to be social " Like "knowing how to be social" ONLINE means anything compared to "knowing how to be social" IN REAL LIFE. Come to Bath. Find me at my regular cocktail bar. Then let's see who knows how to be social and who doesn't. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Just because certain people have been here a while, post on a lot of threads and agree with people who they share opinions with doesn't mean they're in a clique though. They might not even know the people they agree with. They may have never shared anything but a public forum interaction. All due respect, what you describe is literally one of the defining factors of a clique though. Doesn't matter if they know the people they agree with in real life, as long as they think they know the people they agree with online. It's very obvious when you see in certain threads how when a certain user comments, within the next few new comments another profile who is well known in the forums as "one of the same" with them also chimes in and agrees with them/says similar stuff as them. When it happens once or twice, fine maybe it's coincidence. More than that? I don't believe its organic engagement and more like attempts at astroturfing. Is there not a possibility that those people just happen to be online and have an interest in commenting on the same kinds of things? Is it not at all possible that you're looking for that to be the case due to your bias?" Might I ask why is it my bias is the one being speculated about and called out by implication here? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Just because certain people have been here a while, post on a lot of threads and agree with people who they share opinions with doesn't mean they're in a clique though. They might not even know the people they agree with. They may have never shared anything but a public forum interaction. All due respect, what you describe is literally one of the defining factors of a clique though. Doesn't matter if they know the people they agree with in real life, as long as they think they know the people they agree with online. It's very obvious when you see in certain threads how when a certain user comments, within the next few new comments another profile who is well known in the forums as "one of the same" with them also chimes in and agrees with them/says similar stuff as them. When it happens once or twice, fine maybe it's coincidence. More than that? I don't believe its organic engagement and more like attempts at astroturfing. Something tells me you don't know how to be social Like "knowing how to be social" ONLINE means anything compared to "knowing how to be social" IN REAL LIFE. Come to Bath. Find me at my regular cocktail bar. Then let's see who knows how to be social and who doesn't. " I'm the same online as in person so yes for me it's the same. To be honest I'd rather watch paint dry than sit at a bar with you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Just because certain people have been here a while, post on a lot of threads and agree with people who they share opinions with doesn't mean they're in a clique though. They might not even know the people they agree with. They may have never shared anything but a public forum interaction. All due respect, what you describe is literally one of the defining factors of a clique though. Doesn't matter if they know the people they agree with in real life, as long as they think they know the people they agree with online. It's very obvious when you see in certain threads how when a certain user comments, within the next few new comments another profile who is well known in the forums as "one of the same" with them also chimes in and agrees with them/says similar stuff as them. When it happens once or twice, fine maybe it's coincidence. More than that? I don't believe its organic engagement and more like attempts at astroturfing. " I'll ask a direct question then. Would I be classed as a clique member or well known or popular in your opinion? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |