Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Tragic loss of such young lives. Has anything been said about what caused the crash?" It was only days ago and there's an investigation so too early to say. Tragic and hopefully not caused by drink/drug driving which sadly is a common cause of car accidents in the young. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-64880383 A | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Tragic loss of such young lives. Has anything been said about what caused the crash? It was only days ago and there's an investigation so too early to say. Tragic and hopefully not caused by drink/drug driving which sadly is a common cause of car accidents in the young. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-64880383 That’s what I’m thinking too A" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt." 100% agree | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The aerial pictures of the scene make it obvious excess speed was a factor. They also appear to have failed to even attempt to navigate a bend so driver distraction was probably a factor too. I suspect, assuming that the driver is one of the dead, their toxicology results will possibly shed further light on the cause. We can also assume the media won’t tell us " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt. 100% agree " How about sympathy for the passengers? They weren't all driving...... 
A | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt. 100% agree How about sympathy for the passengers? They weren't all driving......
A" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt. 100% agree How about sympathy for the passengers? They weren't all driving......
A"They were not children. They would have known the risks of getting into that car. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The aerial pictures of the scene make it obvious excess speed was a factor. They also appear to have failed to even attempt to navigate a bend so driver distraction was probably a factor too. I suspect, assuming that the driver is one of the dead, their toxicology results will possibly shed further light on the cause. We can also assume the media won’t tell us " The media will undoubtedly report on the inquests, though arguably, do the family need to tell us? Is it really of any relevance to thise not directly effected | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The aerial pictures of the scene make it obvious excess speed was a factor. They also appear to have failed to even attempt to navigate a bend so driver distraction was probably a factor too. I suspect, assuming that the driver is one of the dead, their toxicology results will possibly shed further light on the cause. We can also assume the media won’t tell us The media will undoubtedly report on the inquests, though arguably, do the family need to tell us? Is it really of any relevance to thise not directly effected" If the media have chosen to tell us the story Then we need the whole story No? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The aerial pictures of the scene make it obvious excess speed was a factor. They also appear to have failed to even attempt to navigate a bend so driver distraction was probably a factor too. I suspect, assuming that the driver is one of the dead, their toxicology results will possibly shed further light on the cause. We can also assume the media won’t tell us The media will undoubtedly report on the inquests, though arguably, do the family need to tell us? Is it really of any relevance to thise not directly effected If the media have chosen to tell us the story Then we need the whole story No?" It will be months if not years before the full story is known, by then this will be long forgotten | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt. 100% agree How about sympathy for the passengers? They weren't all driving......
A
They were not children. They would have known the risks of getting into that car. "Let's say there were no drink/drugs involved and the driver was just driving recklessly - would you still say the same? And are you always aware how much those you're with have had to drink and if they have taken anything? You're making a lot of assumptions. A | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt. 100% agree How about sympathy for the passengers? They weren't all driving......
A
They were not children. They would have known the risks of getting into that car. "Of course they were children, they all had parents. It would be easy to speculate but what's the point? It's very sad | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt. 100% agree How about sympathy for the passengers? They weren't all driving......
A
They were not children. They would have known the risks of getting into that car.
Let's say there were no drink/drugs involved and the driver was just driving recklessly - would you still say the same?
And are you always aware how much those you're with have had to drink and if they have taken anything?
You're making a lot of assumptions.
A"That’s why i stated my message with an ‘IF’. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt. 100% agree How about sympathy for the passengers? They weren't all driving......
A
They were not children. They would have known the risks of getting into that car.
Of course they were children, they all had parents.
It would be easy to speculate but what's the point?
"That’s the point of this thread !!!!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt. 100% agree How about sympathy for the passengers? They weren't all driving......
A
They were not children. They would have known the risks of getting into that car.
Of course they were children, they all had parents.
It would be easy to speculate but what's the point?
That’s the point of this thread !!!!!!"You don't need six exclamation marks to try and get a point across. I appreciate a reply but it doesn't answer my question. It's not a nice thread. I feel so sorry for all the parents, relatives, friends, survivors, everyone involved. One set of parents involved lost their other Daughter 8 years ago in a crash, she was killed by a d*unk driver. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt. 100% agree How about sympathy for the passengers? They weren't all driving......
A
They were not children. They would have known the risks of getting into that car.
Of course they were children, they all had parents.
It would be easy to speculate but what's the point?
That’s the point of this thread !!!!!!
You don't need six exclamation marks to try and get a point across.
I appreciate a reply but it doesn't answer my question. It's not a nice thread.
"Then take it up with the OP . We just commented. Didn’t create it !!!!!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt. 100% agree How about sympathy for the passengers? They weren't all driving......
A
They were not children. They would have known the risks of getting into that car.
Of course they were children, they all had parents.
It would be easy to speculate but what's the point?
That’s the point of this thread !!!!!!
You don't need six exclamation marks to try and get a point across.
I appreciate a reply but it doesn't answer my question. It's not a nice thread.
Then take it up with the OP . We just commented. Didn’t create it !!!!!!!" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt. 100% agree How about sympathy for the passengers? They weren't all driving......
A
They were not children. They would have known the risks of getting into that car.
Of course they were children, they all had parents.
It would be easy to speculate but what's the point?
That’s the point of this thread !!!!!!
You don't need six exclamation marks to try and get a point across.
I appreciate a reply but it doesn't answer my question. It's not a nice thread.
I feel so sorry for all the parents, relatives, friends, survivors, everyone involved.
One set of parents involved lost their other Daughter 8 years ago in a crash, she was killed by a d*unk driver.
"Isn’t a nice thread ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"IF they were d*unk or on drugs and negligent we have zero sympathy. Driving is no joke and you need to respect the rules. If you play with fire you’re gonna get burnt. 100% agree How about sympathy for the passengers? They weren't all driving......
A
They were not children. They would have known the risks of getting into that car.
Of course they were children, they all had parents.
It would be easy to speculate but what's the point?
That’s the point of this thread !!!!!!
You don't need six exclamation marks to try and get a point across.
I appreciate a reply but it doesn't answer my question. It's not a nice thread.
I feel so sorry for all the parents, relatives, friends, survivors, everyone involved.
One set of parents involved lost their other Daughter 8 years ago in a crash, she was killed by a d*unk driver.
Isn’t a nice thread ?
"Well I've used it to pay my respects rather than speculate but I never intend to derail a thread. Use the blank box we write in as you wish, within the rules | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
