Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Introductions |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When i actually try to go after a target a rarely miss my mark" Right. Good one. Thanks | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wish people would drop the 'white' part of white Knight. It's equally racist." As far as I know it has nothing to do with skin colour but I think you already knew that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wish people would drop the 'white' part of white Knight. It's equally racist. As far as I know it has nothing to do with skin colour but I think you already knew that." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shhhhh it will catch on You’re still pretty wide at 25-55 , looks like you’re hedging a little still" Oh shit yeah! Forgot to adjust the age preference in the "looking for" tab!! I'll get on that later... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As someone who started his Fab life on a single male profile I never had to take 'this step'. I never adopted the any holes a goal approach, nor did I subscribe to the notion that women ruled the roost and controlled life on site. I just did my own thing and contacted who I chose, dicked around on the forums and grew good social networks. I'm not sure why you made reference to 'White Knights' in this post as that's a completely different topic to changing your approach to fab life and focussing on specific groups. White knights just agree with anything a woman says and leap to their defence to boost their chances of a shag. It doesn't mean they don't also have preferences, tastes and ideas of who they want to meet. Just because someone wants to come across as a defender of all things female doesn't mean they want to shag anyone and everyone. They just want to look like 'the good guy' that all women will love. A" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No fat chicks. Unless they're Latina. Got it. All good. I don't understand the reference to white knighting though? It doesn't make sense. " Have I misunderstood the term White Knight? Could be - I heard it once or twice on the forums and took it to mean a bloke who tries to be all things for all women... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No fat chicks. Unless they're Latina. Got it. All good. I don't understand the reference to white knighting though? It doesn't make sense. Have I misunderstood the term White Knight? Could be - I heard it once or twice on the forums and took it to mean a bloke who tries to be all things for all women... " I think Obi_Fox has explained it clearly. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No fat chicks. Unless they're Latina. Got it. All good. I don't understand the reference to white knighting though? It doesn't make sense. Have I misunderstood the term White Knight? Could be - I heard it once or twice on the forums and took it to mean a bloke who tries to be all things for all women... " It means a man who tries to ingratiate himself by adopting a moral high ground he can’t really occupy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What we need around here is a few more shield maidens and no mistaking " Now I've got to look up what a Shield Maiden is... Haha! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As someone who started his Fab life on a single male profile I never had to take 'this step'. I never adopted the any holes a goal approach, nor did I subscribe to the notion that women ruled the roost and controlled life on site. I just did my own thing and contacted who I chose, dicked around on the forums and grew good social networks. I'm not sure why you made reference to 'White Knights' in this post as that's a completely different topic to changing your approach to fab life and focussing on specific groups. White knights just agree with anything a woman says and leap to their defence to boost their chances of a shag. It doesn't mean they don't also have preferences, tastes and ideas of who they want to meet. Just because someone wants to come across as a defender of all things female doesn't mean they want to shag anyone and everyone. They just want to look like 'the good guy' that all women will love. A" I think “back in our day” (god I just dated us!) people use to actually do some research and figure out a lay of the land so speak before entering… they had a much better understanding… You know… that reading posts thing..you got a feel on how to fit in… whereas now, just jump in sink or swim! So there were a lot more people with their own unique selling points going about doing their thing! Now… it blandy bland as people don’t take the time and think the wider the net is spread the more people they will be and the more chance of success a | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Your "preferences" still basically cover any female. " Yeah, well... gimme a chance! I'm trying to break the habit of a lifetime here!! Haha! #babysteps x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As someone who started his Fab life on a single male profile I never had to take 'this step'. I never adopted the any holes a goal approach, nor did I subscribe to the notion that women ruled the roost and controlled life on site. I just did my own thing and contacted who I chose, dicked around on the forums and grew good social networks. I'm not sure why you made reference to 'White Knights' in this post as that's a completely different topic to changing your approach to fab life and focussing on specific groups. White knights just agree with anything a woman says and leap to their defence to boost their chances of a shag. It doesn't mean they don't also have preferences, tastes and ideas of who they want to meet. Just because someone wants to come across as a defender of all things female doesn't mean they want to shag anyone and everyone. They just want to look like 'the good guy' that all women will love. A I think “back in our day” (god I just dated us!) people use to actually do some research and figure out a lay of the land so speak before entering… they had a much better understanding… You know… that reading posts thing..you got a feel on how to fit in… whereas now, just jump in sink or swim! So there were a lot more people with their own unique selling points going about doing their thing! Now… it blandy bland as people don’t take the time and think the wider the net is spread the more people they will be and the more chance of success a " 'Back in the day'........ A phrase I've learnt to live with well what with me having a few more candles on my cake than Fox! Yep. The scattergun approach never works but it will generally take people time to work that out, whether single males or couples. Women of course have the opposite problem that goes hand in hand and takes them a while to workout how to solve - excess attention. Filtering up being the quick and easy solution. Those that get it, get it. Some take longer than others. Some never learn. Some just delete their unsuccessful profiles and think a shiny new one will be the solution. Bwahahahahahahahaha ! A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Refreshing! I wish more guys would be open and stop claiming that every type is their type! White knights are so prevalent and I find it very offputting! " Didn’t see this before I commented but totally agree. I’ve always preferred the men who actually stand up for themselves on here and who will actually give an honest opinion without worrying people “won’t like them”. They are few and far between. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Your "preferences" still basically cover any female. Yeah, well... gimme a chance! I'm trying to break the habit of a lifetime here!! Haha! #babysteps x" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too long for me to read but with regards to the question I much prefer people being honest about what they want rather than the everyone’s beautiful, I have no preferences crap. Wish everyone did that " Yes, no, I'm not trying to get people's opinions on my new profile. Honest! I've already taken advice from the two fabbers who have already met me for that. But thanks for addressing my actual question - I'm glad to hear from ladies that I'm doing the right thing | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After 8 weeks or so on here - and may I say how much I'm enjoying it?! Best dating website bar none!! - I've decided to make a very fundamental change to my profile. Whereas previously I had been fishing with a net, you might say - now I have decided to adopt the hook and line method. I've taken the drastic - and actually rather nerve-racking! - decision to actually be a bit more SPECIFIC about the kind of lady I hope to find! To actually express some PREFERENCES!! Ladies will probably be thinking "um... and..?", But I think the fellas might understand the turmoil which I had to go through to come to this decision. Thoughts like "You're cutting your chances down, mate!" and " You can't say 'No BBW' these days - you'll get crucified!!" loom large in our minds! We're terrified of being ourselves in case the lovely ladies find fault with us. So I'd like to hear from fellas who have taken this bold step - how did it go..? What drove the decision? Also, what about from guys who think this is a very very bad idea? Why do you think that? And from the ladies - Can you honestly say, hand on heart, that you absolutely would not never ever no sir-ee harshly judge a bloke who expressed a preference for one kind of woman over another..? For one SIZE of woman? For one AGE of woman? Whatever it might be... Hope to get everybody reflecting honestly and sharing respectfully. " Depends on how they express their preferences really. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As someone who started his Fab life on a single male profile I never had to take 'this step'. I never adopted the any holes a goal approach, nor did I subscribe to the notion that women ruled the roost and controlled life on site. I just did my own thing and contacted who I chose, dicked around on the forums and grew good social networks. I'm not sure why you made reference to 'White Knights' in this post as that's a completely different topic to changing your approach to fab life and focussing on specific groups. White knights just agree with anything a woman says and leap to their defence to boost their chances of a shag. It doesn't mean they don't also have preferences, tastes and ideas of who they want to meet. Just because someone wants to come across as a defender of all things female doesn't mean they want to shag anyone and everyone. They just want to look like 'the good guy' that all women will love. A" Thanks for the reassurance! Good to know that you've been being your true self right from the start and are still doing your thing all these years later! I would love to emulate that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I cant see why somebody would get upset over somebody else's sexual preferences on a swinging site, but then again I'm not attracted to every man who messages me and if they're not for me/us we politely pass. Each to their own and all that jazz " I can see why people get upset if it's done in a rude or crass way. I've seen a profile before that said "no fatties you have to be under a size 12 if you're not I suggest you get off your fat arse stop eating the donuts and go to the doctor". No problem whatsoever with people's preferences but it does seem to be how it's done that sometimes causes offence. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I cometely take the point about the 'hey, all women are beautiful' takes, which are sweet and lovely and somewhat patronising. But the reasons I'm not super-specific are two-fold. 1: I love chatting and perhaps meeting socially with people who aren't 'my type' - why wouldn't I? And 2: I genuinely don't have 'a type', except that they need to make my hrart race a little faster and my mouth go dry. I've had brilliant relationships with very slim women and very large ones; black, Asian, and white women; tall and small; huge breasts, A-cups, and most things in between. Because none of those things defines what attracts me. That is NOT the same as saying I don't discriminate (in the original sense), because of course I do, like any honest person. It's saying that my desires are inchoate, puckish, liminal, terpsichorean. I was asked out by a model once and said no, because she left me cold. She was beautiful, but not for me. So stated preferences are honest and great and to be applauded, but some of us don't have our libidos so neatly corraled. " This is great! So interesting! You see I'm NOT really very sociable so I really do not want to meet people I'm not likely to fancy. On the other hand, though, I TOTALLY take your point about the cold as ice supermodel!! It's a minefield, innit?!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |