Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"why dont the site organisers charge a small fee of £20 per month for being on the site maybe this will get rid of timewasters and fake profiles as genuine swingers wont mind paying im sure" Timewasters have money too. Who is wasting your time? Perhaps if you explain what is happening others can help you out with how you go about choosing meets. Admin x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"it was just a suggestion of trying to get rid of timewasyers and fake profile especially ones who have been on the site 3 years and more with no meets and no veris " I just ignore those profiles, I think you can set filters to not recieve messages from unverified people. This has been mentioned before and people who have belonged to paid sites say it makes no difference x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"it was just a suggestion of trying to get rid of timewasyers and fake profile especially ones who have been on the site 3 years and more with no meets and no veris I just ignore those profiles, I think you can set filters to not recieve messages from unverified people.ok thaks for that xx This has been mentioned before and people who have belonged to paid sites say it makes no difference x" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"it was just a suggestion of trying to get rid of timewasyers and fake profile especially ones who have been on the site 3 years and more with no meets and no veris " If people have been here 3 years and have no veris and no meets showing. Then maybe they just dont like to brag. They only waste your time if you allow them to. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"it was just a suggestion of trying to get rid of timewasyers and fake profile especially ones who have been on the site 3 years and more with no meets and no veris " no meets and no veris in 3 years. maybe they're not here to meet. its not mandatory. that doesn't mean they're wasting anyone's time. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I currently work full time on minimum wage while I'm studying with the OU. I barely have £20 a month spare to buy things like clothes and get my hair cut. Why should I pay to rid the site of time wasters when I have never encountered one since I joined here?" lucky u lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"why dont the site organisers charge a small fee of £20 per month for being on the site maybe this will get rid of timewasters and fake profiles as genuine swingers wont mind paying im sure" .Cool idea and charge as well for every message sent and 20 quid to go in chat rooms,and after all that you will still get time wasters,so what is the point????????????????????/ | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"why dont the site organisers charge a small fee of £20 per month for being on the site maybe this will get rid of timewasters and fake profiles as genuine swingers wont mind paying im sure.Cool idea and charge as well for every message sent and 20 quid to go in chat rooms,and after all that you will still get time wasters,so what is the point????????????????????/ " totally agree.I just think people are expecting fab to mother them..NOW STOP! ur too old to suck from mummies tits.. perhaps its unfair an opinion yes, but I have uised the internet for over 10years, from the infancy of textchatrooms and dialupinternet lol easier rules to adhere to if finding things problematic are: webcam chat(for identify if thinking fake)(dont sit around happy wanking with the meet, as some end up just using that to get cheap online thrill) phone chat(use a cheap disposable number) the verification system(if it shows meets is beneficial,JUST to show the people meet, not for judging sexual promise/performance) try adding this all together and u basically have 90% of the requirements to get validity of who u are wanting to meet. *Generally Ive never had any problems, and rarely ever webcam, and think I do well as a single man..but I most of the time will think if it is too good to be true it might just be a pile of shite windup..I lack the gullibleness to venture out the house on meets that dont do what I want on the genuinity front.If I lose out on someone real..och well..its only fucking sex. and paying?-I tried that on other sites...barely ever had a meet. There are members who paid/pay sometimes hundreds of pounds..just pretending to be HotlipsLolita | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Heres an idea..... Accept it happens on EVERY site and get over it!!!! " my trainspotting group site is full of them....cant meet for the 11.25am to birmingham?-fucking timewasting cunts | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You see, I take offence at the remark "small fee of £20 per month". As that one crack implies the superiority of the OP and anyone else who can afford a frivolous £240 a year over those of us that are already having a hard time in the credit crunch (and yes, I work) who would simply not have that much "extra" disposable income. It gives a sense of "long live the middle class". " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I currently work full time on minimum wage while I'm studying with the OU. I barely have £20 a month spare to buy things like clothes and get my hair cut. Why should I pay to rid the site of time wasters when I have never encountered one since I joined here?" Can't agree more, this is by far the best site we are members on and the only one we will pay for as its so bloody reasonable. £5 for 2 months... Why wouldn't you? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"why dont the site organisers charge a small fee of £20 per month for being on the site maybe this will get rid of timewasters and fake profiles as genuine swingers wont mind paying im sure" I'm genuine but no way am I paying £20 a month to be on here. No offence site owners I'm just tight lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a time waster but couldn't pay £20 a month to be on here. So there you go, you've lost a genuine person with your 'getting rid of time wasters' idea." That will teach me to read a thread first as I have said just the same | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You see, I take offence at the remark "small fee of £20 per month". As that one crack implies the superiority of the OP and anyone else who can afford a frivolous £240 a year over those of us that are already having a hard time in the credit crunch (and yes, I work) who would simply not have that much "extra" disposable income. It gives a sense of "long live the middle class". " Here here | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"why dont the site organisers charge a small fee of £20 per month for being on the site maybe this will get rid of timewasters and fake profiles as genuine swingers wont mind paying im sure" I'm not a time waster, but I'm a single parent and can't afford £20 a month, why should I be penalised and not be able to use the site but I can't financially afford too. Money won't stop time wasters, they will pay too like they do on other paid sites | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"NAME AND SHAME works when couples get to see whos fake " That Jill and Steve are forecasters I tell ta. Never show up when I arrange a meet with tbem True or false, who is to say?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"NAME AND SHAME works when couples get to see whos fake That Jill and Steve are forecasters I tell ta. Never show up when I arrange a meet with tbem True or false, who is to say?? " Maybe site could add a calendar to profiles. When two profile agree to meet they both enter date on calendar, if one doesn't show up other profile hits calendar and reports to admin. Calendar then sends automated email from admin to party not shown up to ask for reason, if admin think reason is poor they could issue a red flag that's displayed on profile for set time, if admin think reason justified and automated email could be sent to profile let down. Red flag then tells other users potential time waster. Could even do it where red flag stays on profile until a met has taken place to prove genuine | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"NAME AND SHAME works when couples get to see whos fake That Jill and Steve are forecasters I tell ta. Never show up when I arrange a meet with tbem True or false, who is to say?? Maybe site could add a calendar to profiles. When two profile agree to meet they both enter date on calendar, if one doesn't show up other profile hits calendar and reports to admin. Calendar then sends automated email from admin to party not shown up to ask for reason, if admin think reason is poor they could issue a red flag that's displayed on profile for set time, if admin think reason justified and automated email could be sent to profile let down. Red flag then tells other users potential time waster. Could even do it where red flag stays on profile until a met has taken place to prove genuine" Why not report them yourself? When the reports start stacking up against the person in question the admin act. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"NAME AND SHAME works when couples get to see whos fake That Jill and Steve are forecasters I tell ta. Never show up when I arrange a meet with tbem True or false, who is to say?? Maybe site could add a calendar to profiles. When two profile agree to meet they both enter date on calendar, if one doesn't show up other profile hits calendar and reports to admin. Calendar then sends automated email from admin to party not shown up to ask for reason, if admin think reason is poor they could issue a red flag that's displayed on profile for set time,. " What would be a poor excuse to some is a genuine one to others. I spoke to a woman last week on another site who had said she had reported someone for not turning up an hour after they were meant to be meeting. Turns out he was 2 hours late after getting stuck in a jam on the motorway because of an accident and did turn up after all....he had sent a text but she didn't get it until after he got there. Things do sometimes happen that are out of peoples control. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why don't we all ask admin if they can turn up at every meet because then they will be able to see who doesn't turn up. Bingo they then can delete pesky time wasters. Failing that I suggest people put it down to experience , check their own way of looking for meets and move the hell on. " Or maybe we should have a system where we're all microchipped - then upon arriving for a meet you could 'scan' the other part, which would feed into a complex data system recording time, date, location, height, weight, cock length, tit size, eye colour, any visible tattoos and scars - and is you subsequently scanned again at the end - would also record the length of the meet, the number of orgasms, the volume of decibels of any moans, size of cumshots and whether condoms were used or not? Would verify any claims of 'size', 'repeater/heavy cummer/gusher/squirter' claims often seen on profiles as well as pinpointing locations via GPS to ensure 'Flossy from Finchley' isn't 'Derek from Djibouti'? That should solve any issues re time wasters eh? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why don't we all ask admin if they can turn up at every meet because then they will be able to see who doesn't turn up. Bingo they then can delete pesky time wasters. Failing that I suggest people put it down to experience , check their own way of looking for meets and move the hell on. Or maybe we should have a system where we're all microchipped - then upon arriving for a meet you could 'scan' the other part, which would feed into a complex data system recording time, date, location, height, weight, cock length, tit size, eye colour, any visible tattoos and scars - and is you subsequently scanned again at the end - would also record the length of the meet, the number of orgasms, the volume of decibels of any moans, size of cumshots and whether condoms were used or not? Would verify any claims of 'size', 'repeater/heavy cummer/gusher/squirter' claims often seen on profiles as well as pinpointing locations via GPS to ensure 'Flossy from Finchley' isn't 'Derek from Djibouti'? That should solve any issues re time wasters eh? " Oh I'm liking that idea lots, can I have the chip in a boob please | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"NAME AND SHAME works when couples get to see whos fake That Jill and Steve are forecasters I tell ta. Never show up when I arrange a meet with tbem True or false, who is to say?? Maybe site could add a calendar to profiles. When two profile agree to meet they both enter date on calendar, if one doesn't show up other profile hits calendar and reports to admin. Calendar then sends automated email from admin to party not shown up to ask for reason, if admin think reason is poor they could issue a red flag that's displayed on profile for set time, if admin think reason justified and automated email could be sent to profile let down. Red flag then tells other users potential time waster. Could even do it where red flag stays on profile until a met has taken place to prove genuine" Maybe they could sign an official contract to a meet to?? This site is a bit of fun in free time. Sometimes your free time isn't as free as you thought it was 3 weeks ago when you Rrange a meet. If we have to start synchronizing calender entries and other admin tasks that's just gonna sap all the fun out of it!! Pretty sure admin would relish all the extra work from the reports sent | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why not have a time limit to how long people have to get verified in person by meeting other verified people. If the sites more serious about having a genuine swinging community than making money its one possibilty. Making money from fake profiles could be a lucrative buisness " On that basis I would be banished for not being verified for meeting anyone off here, despite advertising for meets in my time here? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"it was just a suggestion of trying to get rid of timewasyers and fake profile especially ones who have been on the site 3 years and more with no meets and no veris " You answer your own question then. Someone like that contacts you - block them. They can't waste YOUR time anymore. The reason this site is so good and so popular is precisely because it IS free. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why don't we all ask admin if they can turn up at every meet because then they will be able to see who doesn't turn up. Bingo they then can delete pesky time wasters. Failing that I suggest people put it down to experience , check their own way of looking for meets and move the hell on. Or maybe we should have a system where we're all microchipped - then upon arriving for a meet you could 'scan' the other part, which would feed into a complex data system recording time, date, location, height, weight, cock length, tit size, eye colour, any visible tattoos and scars - and is you subsequently scanned again at the end - would also record the length of the meet, the number of orgasms, the volume of decibels of any moans, size of cumshots and whether condoms were used or not? Would verify any claims of 'size', 'repeater/heavy cummer/gusher/squirter' claims often seen on profiles as well as pinpointing locations via GPS to ensure 'Flossy from Finchley' isn't 'Derek from Djibouti'? That should solve any issues re time wasters eh? " Hahahaha too funny | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why don't we all ask admin if they can turn up at every meet because then they will be able to see who doesn't turn up. Bingo they then can delete pesky time wasters. Failing that I suggest people put it down to experience , check their own way of looking for meets and move the hell on. Or maybe we should have a system where we're all microchipped - then upon arriving for a meet you could 'scan' the other part, which would feed into a complex data system recording time, date, location, height, weight, cock length, tit size, eye colour, any visible tattoos and scars - and is you subsequently scanned again at the end - would also record the length of the meet, the number of orgasms, the volume of decibels of any moans, size of cumshots and whether condoms were used or not? Would verify any claims of 'size', 'repeater/heavy cummer/gusher/squirter' claims often seen on profiles as well as pinpointing locations via GPS to ensure 'Flossy from Finchley' isn't 'Derek from Djibouti'? That should solve any issues re time wasters eh? Hahahaha too funny " watch out think stephen fry the gaget man has this if not frank it may be worth cash lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i have a radical idea......why dont people just accept that it happens on EVERY site, dating, swinging, dogging etc and get on with their lives????? " So true x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I pay already ! describe to me what a timewaster is in your eyes please " I pay too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"NAME AND SHAME works when couples get to see whos fake That Jill and Steve are forecasters I tell ta. Never show up when I arrange a meet with tbem True or false, who is to say?? Maybe site could add a calendar to profiles. When two profile agree to meet they both enter date on calendar, if one doesn't show up other profile hits calendar and reports to admin. Calendar then sends automated email from admin to party not shown up to ask for reason, if admin think reason is poor they could issue a red flag that's displayed on profile for set time,. What would be a poor excuse to some is a genuine one to others. I spoke to a woman last week on another site who had said she had reported someone for not turning up an hour after they were meant to be meeting. Turns out he was 2 hours late after getting stuck in a jam on the motorway because of an accident and did turn up after all....he had sent a text but she didn't get it until after he got there. Things do sometimes happen that are out of peoples control. " then maybe he should have called rather than texted to make sure she got the message. And to the previous poster I have reported those that haven't shown up, nothing happens, their profiles still online, so in all honesty reporting seems pretty pointless. And for record I had messages on here from said guy who claimed ten minutes away, yet never showed up, turns out was in chat room all night and had no intention of turning up, reported via message he sent claiming on way and reportedwasin chat room duration of night, guess what, his profile still on line, nothing happened to him . If red flag system was introduced, and flag given if sufficient proof, ie, messages saying on way etc, then that would help those when making a selection. The guy that failed to show had verifications on his account, so seems being verified means nothing either | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"it was just a suggestion of trying to get rid of timewasyers and fake profile especially ones who have been on the site 3 years and more with no meets and no veris I just ignore those profiles, I think you can set filters to not recieve messages from unverified people. This has been mentioned before and people who have belonged to paid sites say it makes no difference x" It's been mentioned before - on here? No way? Time wasters? I don't believe you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It seems fairly simple to me. Although it will not stop folk from timewasting, why not only allow a period of time to get photo verified and after that period say a couple of weeks stop them from messaging. I am sure this would cut down the number considerably" More likely increase the 'user no longer on site' incidences and subsequently an equal number of new profiles!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It all depends on what the profile is looking for & where they are situated. We've been classed as time wasters in the past because we have no meets (on this site, we have had meets from another site but they don't count do they), BUT we are only looking for single Bi fems (or at least a women in a open relationship). There's a hell of a lot less of them, than couples so of course we're going to struggle. Just like the person living in a village is going to have fewer numbers of people available to them, then say someone in London. Don't be so quick to judge those with no meets. They may not necessarily be time wasters. We've chatted to quite a few time wasters (they've certainly wasted OUR time) but have been verified & have a list of meets." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It seems fairly simple to me. Although it will not stop folk from timewasting, why not only allow a period of time to get photo verified and after that period say a couple of weeks stop them from messaging. I am sure this would cut down the number considerably" We are not photo verified and do not intend to be... Are we time wasters? (See the verifications on our profile before you answer that) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i agree anyone here longer than six months should have at least two valadations or else deleated" I have met several individuals and couples who refuse to verify and be verified, privacy is all for some people, and some people have nothing to prove to others, nor care what others think | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"it was just a suggestion of trying to get rid of timewasyers and fake profile especially ones who have been on the site 3 years and more with no meets and no veris " Verification does not happen when people refuse to meet you not that you have refused to meet! I've been looking to meet for so long now and haven't been successful... Does that make me a timewaster then? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i agree anyone here longer than six months should have at least two "validations" or else "deleted"" ...even when you are a single guy and live in Norwich? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do feel sorry for people that put up a fake profiles as these people sit a home on their own with no friends and have nothing better to do with their lives. We have as much chance of winning the Nigeria lottery as getting rid of them, so we just have to live with it" I won Nigeria lottery! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why don't we all ask admin if they can turn up at every meet because then they will be able to see who doesn't turn up. Bingo they then can delete pesky time wasters. Failing that I suggest people put it down to experience , check their own way of looking for meets and move the hell on. " Lol! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As before it really doesnt matter how much you charge timewasters will pay any amount for the thrill of winding someone up for a meet Here's an idea though and it may sound completely mad, How about if you get messed around by a timewaster report the profile for it ? An heres another idea for the site owners once a profile has been reported for timewasting block the I.P. address from making any more profiles. I have reported a couple of profiles for various reasons and the profiles are still on here Admin you keep saying if you have a problem then report it and you will take action ..... If we are keeping our side of the deal then please keep to your side of the deal and get rid of the idiot fringe in here xx " Blocking IP addresses is not that simple these days. Many people have their routers set to a floating IP address which basically randomly changes several times per day, therefore your IP addy changes. I think the best thing you can do is to basically ignore the timewasters. You can privately inform your friends of personal experiences of timewasters and eventually word will get round. It is annoying I know, but no matter what you do, they will always be here. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"why dont the site organisers charge a small fee of £20 per month for being on the site maybe this will get rid of timewasters and fake profiles as genuine swingers wont mind paying im sure" would not pay it. but you are so right this site will in a year maybe two stop working as a swingers site. will just be a site for people to wank over webcams and talk dirty . sad really, seen it before | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It seems fairly simple to me. Although it will not stop folk from timewasting, why not only allow a period of time to get photo verified and after that period say a couple of weeks stop them from messaging. I am sure this would cut down the number considerably" photo verified LOL | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You see, I take offence at the remark "small fee of £20 per month". As that one crack implies the superiority of the OP and anyone else who can afford a frivolous £240 a year over those of us that are already having a hard time in the credit crunch (and yes, I work) who would simply not have that much "extra" disposable income. It gives a sense of "long live the middle class". " Lol!! When i rule fabswingers.... 1. No admin veri within 6 weeks - account suspended. 2. No activity on account for four months - account removed. (less on search option) 3. Automated fem response button, 'thanks but no thanks' The rest is common sense when looking for potential meets. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You see, I take offence at the remark "small fee of £20 per month". As that one crack implies the superiority of the OP and anyone else who can afford a frivolous £240 a year over those of us that are already having a hard time in the credit crunch (and yes, I work) who would simply not have that much "extra" disposable income. It gives a sense of "long live the middle class". Lol!! When i rule fabswingers.... 1. No admin veri within 6 weeks - account suspended. 2. No activity on account for four months - account removed. (less on search option) 3. Automated fem response button, 'thanks but no thanks' The rest is common sense when looking for potential meets. " Agree with all except 3 why just a fem automated response we are all equal why treat fems as special case. Yes i know they will proportionately get more messages but to treat as special case i cannot agree with. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |