FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

Sexuality preferences.

Jump to newest
 

By *aunchyrabbits OP   Couple
23 weeks ago

West Dorset

I know there are as many kinds of sexuality as there are shades of grey and it would be impractical to list them all.

But maybe in 2024 could fab update things to recognise these sexual preferences? Add a few more options to the drop down list?

Also another point is it fair to categorise trans people with crossdressers?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asterMeliodasMan
23 weeks ago

Newmill


"I know there are as many kinds of sexuality as there are shades of grey and it would be impractical to list them all.

But maybe in 2024 could fab update things to recognise these sexual preferences? Add a few more options to the drop down list?

Also another point is it fair to categorise trans people with crossdressers? "

I've had the same thought on the latter point before. There's too much variety in those groups to consider them part of the same demographic, IMO, and they're often completely different and separate things.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lowupdollTV/TS
23 weeks ago

Herts/Beds/Lomdon


"I know there are as many kinds of sexuality as there are shades of grey and it would be impractical to list them all.

But maybe in 2024 could fab update things to recognise these sexual preferences? Add a few more options to the drop down list?

Also another point is it fair to categorise trans people with crossdressers?

I've had the same thought on the latter point before. There's too much variety in those groups to consider them part of the same demographic, IMO, and they're often completely different and separate things."

So a bearded tv says I’m trans. They move to that category. Trans doesn’t give a shit about labels, they stay in tv section. Etc

How about we have a category for men certified 6’ plus that would be more popular and useful, a category for women within certain size parameters?

Everyone is keen to create a two tier world until they’re in the 2nd tier.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aunchyrabbits OP   Couple
23 weeks ago

West Dorset


"I know there are as many kinds of sexuality as there are shades of grey and it would be impractical to list them all.

But maybe in 2024 could fab update things to recognise these sexual preferences? Add a few more options to the drop down list?

Also another point is it fair to categorise trans people with crossdressers?

I've had the same thought on the latter point before. There's too much variety in those groups to consider them part of the same demographic, IMO, and they're often completely different and separate things.

So a bearded tv says I’m trans. They move to that category. Trans doesn’t give a shit about labels, they stay in tv section. Etc

How about we have a category for men certified 6’ plus that would be more popular and useful, a category for women within certain size parameters?

Everyone is keen to create a two tier world until they’re in the 2nd tier. "

Part of the verification process to take a photo alongside a tape measure?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lowupdollTV/TS
23 weeks ago

Herts/Beds/Lomdon


"I know there are as many kinds of sexuality as there are shades of grey and it would be impractical to list them all.

But maybe in 2024 could fab update things to recognise these sexual preferences? Add a few more options to the drop down list?

Also another point is it fair to categorise trans people with crossdressers?

I've had the same thought on the latter point before. There's too much variety in those groups to consider them part of the same demographic, IMO, and they're often completely different and separate things.

So a bearded tv says I’m trans. They move to that category. Trans doesn’t give a shit about labels, they stay in tv section. Etc

How about we have a category for men certified 6’ plus that would be more popular and useful, a category for women within certain size parameters?

Everyone is keen to create a two tier world until they’re in the 2nd tier.

Part of the verification process to take a photo alongside a tape measure? "

That could work. Given remotes might vary in size

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asterMeliodasMan
23 weeks ago

Newmill


"I know there are as many kinds of sexuality as there are shades of grey and it would be impractical to list them all.

But maybe in 2024 could fab update things to recognise these sexual preferences? Add a few more options to the drop down list?

Also another point is it fair to categorise trans people with crossdressers?

I've had the same thought on the latter point before. There's too much variety in those groups to consider them part of the same demographic, IMO, and they're often completely different and separate things.

So a bearded tv says I’m trans. They move to that category. Trans doesn’t give a shit about labels, they stay in tv section. Etc

How about we have a category for men certified 6’ plus that would be more popular and useful, a category for women within certain size parameters?

Everyone is keen to create a two tier world until they’re in the 2nd tier. "

I'm not sure what you mean by this. The only category separation I'd be in favour of is one that makes it easier to tell what you would and wouldn't be getting from a potential profile, and only then assuming it could be done without any one of them being "below" the other. I don't know what tiers would even be created by that, but I'm sorry for implying I wanted anything of the sort.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lowupdollTV/TS
23 weeks ago

Herts/Beds/Lomdon


"I know there are as many kinds of sexuality as there are shades of grey and it would be impractical to list them all.

But maybe in 2024 could fab update things to recognise these sexual preferences? Add a few more options to the drop down list?

Also another point is it fair to categorise trans people with crossdressers?

I've had the same thought on the latter point before. There's too much variety in those groups to consider them part of the same demographic, IMO, and they're often completely different and separate things.

So a bearded tv says I’m trans. They move to that category. Trans doesn’t give a shit about labels, they stay in tv section. Etc

How about we have a category for men certified 6’ plus that would be more popular and useful, a category for women within certain size parameters?

Everyone is keen to create a two tier world until they’re in the 2nd tier.

I'm not sure what you mean by this. The only category separation I'd be in favour of is one that makes it easier to tell what you would and wouldn't be getting from a potential profile, and only then assuming it could be done without any one of them being "below" the other. I don't know what tiers would even be created by that, but I'm sorry for implying I wanted anything of the sort."

You weren’t implying anything I was taking the category idea and extrapolating the unintended consequences. I agree we need better categories but they aren’t without their problems.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rsMistyPeaksWoman
23 weeks ago

Essex

Or…..

Get rid of the labels/categories and let pictures & conversations tell you what you need to know?

Perhaps I’m just really really naive.

Or make it a world in where you’re not afraid to ask questions… and not afraid to answer them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uckurcumMan
23 weeks ago

Bishop Auckland

Whenever you have more choice,there will always be an individual that doesn't want it fit that category etc ..

The problem is the world today,everyone feels the need to be labelled or part of a group....It's very blurred anyway with liberal society and prolific sexual activity,where a man for instance will happily have sex with another man but fern himself straight ..That's his choice ...that was for example only btw

Whatever happened to just being yourself !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eyond PurityCouple
23 weeks ago

Lincolnshire

I've had this convo many times - there are a lot of bi-playful straight people; Orally bi (only) males; bi women who will only meet as MF or FF...

I'm not getting into the trans debate!

The blurred lines of playfulness and sexuality are a minefield and better to ask specifically, yet could be helped better with filters for sure.

C

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loria JamesTV/TS
23 weeks ago

Durham


"I know there are as many kinds of sexuality as there are shades of grey and it would be impractical to list them all.

But maybe in 2024 could fab update things to recognise these sexual preferences? Add a few more options to the drop down list?

Also another point is it fair to categorise trans people with crossdressers?

I've had the same thought on the latter point before. There's too much variety in those groups to consider them part of the same demographic, IMO, and they're often completely different and separate things.

So a bearded tv says I’m trans. They move to that category. Trans doesn’t give a shit about labels, they stay in tv section. Etc

How about we have a category for men certified 6’ plus that would be more popular and useful, a category for women within certain size parameters?

Everyone is keen to create a two tier world until they’re in the 2nd tier.

Part of the verification process to take a photo alongside a tape measure?

That could work. Given remotes might vary in size "

Im currently working on an idea to produce 3inch Sky remotes just for the guys on here x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ab_bicoupleCouple
23 weeks ago

North Hertfordshire


"I know there are as many kinds of sexuality as there are shades of grey and it would be impractical to list them all.

But maybe in 2024 could fab update things to recognise these sexual preferences? Add a few more options to the drop down list?

Also another point is it fair to categorise trans people with crossdressers? "

Yes, agree the tick boxes are woefully incomplete. Also under-utilised, why can't we employ all preferences as filters?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top