Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Wales |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How do I get my name on the list x" Pop a message to 'County Socials' and they will advise you. C and P | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can't message you x" As the social is full we decided to reinstate the filter. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And eveytime that has happen single make don't get the venue time or place had this happen to me a few times on the carmenthen social " You viewed our profile yesterday when the filters were lifted or did you not. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Someone was a bit naughty on here and posted the social location, so much for single guy's being idiots when a couple does this. " Unfortunately we now have to change the venue for future socials. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Someone was a bit naughty on here and posted the social location, so much for single guy's being idiots when a couple does this. " ...It was a very small pub and there was no room up the top end so had to sit down the other side ...Unfortunately we happened to be sitting next to about 8 men who knew why we were all there made disgusting remarks about everyone that walked through the door and made us feel very uncomfortable ....Maybe a venue where we are not treated like we are freaks would be a good idea .... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Enjoyed meeting friends, pity Harry and, Stellla didn’t come and, say hello " ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Enjoyed meeting friends, pity Harry and, Stellla didn’t come and, say hello " Well Stella was unable to attend and who Harry is we don't know as he was definitely not on the list. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Someone was a bit naughty on here and posted the social location, so much for single guy's being idiots when a couple does this. ...It was a very small pub and there was no room up the top end so had to sit down the other side ...Unfortunately we happened to be sitting next to about 8 men who knew why we were all there made disgusting remarks about everyone that walked through the door and made us feel very uncomfortable ....Maybe a venue where we are not treated like we are freaks would be a good idea ...." Same venue as the previous social date and definitely no problems then, we definitely suffered from a member posting the venue details on their profile which we have no control over | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was a very small pub and there was no room up the top end so had to sit down the other side ...Unfortunately we happened to be sitting next to about 8 men who knew why we were all there made disgusting remarks about everyone that walked through the door and made us feel very uncomfortable ....Maybe a venue where we are not treated like we are freaks would be a good idea ...." They were probably feeling jealous and left out. Console yourself with the thought that, while they were in the pub, their wives were likely sat at home dreading their return, and/or cuckolding them with their best friend. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would like to attend but TV's are blocked too ![]() Would be great to have TV’s allowed to attend ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apologies for posting the venue, I didn’t foresee it would cause upset, I appreciate the need for discretion but I assumed the venue would be aware of the situation and we would have exclusivity to openly mix not hide behind the lie that were here for the birthday party so hoped to excite the night which initial feedback was that it wasn’t exactly buzzing. I think the night really lacked diversity in the people attending and would like to see a greater effort made by those organising the event to invite people who are likely to benefit from it. The venue in my opinion was pretty poor also, we had to go and stick the jukebox on to try and get a bit of a vibe going but could barely hear it, or find space to get our groove on. I think in future a better suited venue should be selected - ie music and dance floor and a more open evening. More effort to attract a diverse group, perhaps putting your name down on a thread allows others to see who will be attending and if they catch your eye put your name down too. Be interesting to hear others thoughts on how we can make this night work better for us, since it is our night. Hope my constructive criticism is well received " Your criticism was definitely not constructive but actually destructive | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apologies for posting the venue, I didn’t foresee it would cause upset, I appreciate the need for discretion but I assumed the venue would be aware of the situation and we would have exclusivity to openly mix not hide behind the lie that were here for the birthday party so hoped to excite the night which initial feedback was that it wasn’t exactly buzzing. I think the night really lacked diversity in the people attending and would like to see a greater effort made by those organising the event to invite people who are likely to benefit from it. The venue in my opinion was pretty poor also, we had to go and stick the jukebox on to try and get a bit of a vibe going but could barely hear it, or find space to get our groove on. I think in future a better suited venue should be selected - ie music and dance floor and a more open evening. More effort to attract a diverse group, perhaps putting your name down on a thread allows others to see who will be attending and if they catch your eye put your name down too. Be interesting to hear others thoughts on how we can make this night work better for us, since it is our night. Hope my constructive criticism is well received Your criticism was definitely not constructive but actually destructive " One persons opinion that doesn't mirror many others who have had a good time at this social and previous socials. The majority of us throughly enjoyed ourselves. It's such a shame that a good venue now can't be used through thoughtlessness. County socials do a great job in bringing us together. It's a shame that you didn't enjoy it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It really is, hence my comment to invite others opinion to potentially improve the night for everyone involved. " A simple challenge in that you organise a CARMARTHEN SOCIAL as you seem to be well experienced as we are definitely idiots according to yourselves,we are sure that you will not back out of the challenge and will give you a free run to choose a preferably early date. In the meantime we will refrain from setting the date for our next social. Yes we have made mistakes and apologised accordingly and Not used a attack for a defence. S&H. p.s a early response is what we expect and we are sure that you are happy to accept the challenge p | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It really is, hence my comment to invite others opinion to potentially improve the night for everyone involved. A simple challenge in that you organise a CARMARTHEN SOCIAL as you seem to be well experienced as we are definitely idiots according to yourselves,we are sure that you will not back out of the challenge and will give you a free run to choose a preferably early date. In the meantime we will refrain from setting the date for our next social. Yes we have made mistakes and apologised accordingly and Not used a attack for a defence. S&H. p.s a early response is what we expect and we are sure that you are happy to accept the challenge p" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It really is, hence my comment to invite others opinion to potentially improve the night for everyone involved. A simple challenge in that you organise a CARMARTHEN SOCIAL as you seem to be well experienced as we are definitely idiots according to yourselves,we are sure that you will not back out of the challenge and will give you a free run to choose a preferably early date. In the meantime we will refrain from setting the date for our next social. Yes we have made mistakes and apologised accordingly and Not used a attack for a defence. S&H. p.s a early response is what we expect and we are sure that you are happy to accept the challenge p" Well said Henry and surely we will be in touch with you privately. You have done so well to make this work and we admire what you have done ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It really is, hence my comment to invite others opinion to potentially improve the night for everyone involved. A simple challenge in that you organise a CARMARTHEN SOCIAL as you seem to be well experienced as we are definitely idiots according to yourselves,we are sure that you will not back out of the challenge and will give you a free run to choose a preferably early date. In the meantime we will refrain from setting the date for our next social. Yes we have made mistakes and apologised accordingly and Not used a attack for a defence. S&H. p.s a early response is what we expect and we are sure that you are happy to accept the challenge p Well said Henry and surely we will be in touch with you privately. You have done so well to make this work and we admire what you have done ![]() And we will definitely be in touch for the next one ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To be clear I’m not suggesting a free for all, the organisers did a good job at maintaining discretion and ensuring the attendees were there for the right reasons, as well as openly suggesting improvements I’d like to be clear that I think this aspect was done well." HOW CAN SOMEONE CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS WHILST ACCEPTING THAT DISCRETION WAS PARAMOUNT AND THEN NAMING THE VENUE. WE NOW HAVE TO FIND A NEW VENUE DUE TO YOUR PROFILE POSTING FOR SELFISH PURPOSES S&H | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please clarify where I have referred to you as idiots? Please also clarify how setting a challenge to my feedback offers any benefit to the people using this forum or looking to enjoy a social outing? This feels to me more a response of an immature being who’s feelings have been hurt because what they didn’t please everyone. It happens, you’ll never please everyone but I feel my comments represent those of others whom I’d spoke to also and so are a credible voice, if you are happy with your events and are unwilling to make changes to suit the other population then that’s your call, likewise if you could see value in what I was saying and wanted to collaborate to satisfy the end user that would be fine too. I find your challenge incredibly pointless however, regardless of whether I would or would not accept does not take away from the fact that some people didn’t enjoy the social and feel improvements could be made so voiced them. It’s up to you whether you listen or not." I'd give up if I were you, they have a habit of attacking people who dare to comment negatively, like somehow they think they know better than everyone else. Anyone who uses the excuse of organising a social to pick and choose who gets to attend should be left to it, there are many other socials out there that are much, much more inclusive and friendly. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Anyone who uses the excuse of organising a social to pick and choose who gets to attend should be left to it, there are many other socials out there that are much, much more inclusive and friendly." We would take issue with you here. Surely an element of control over the proportions of those attending is a necessary evil? Otherwise the balance of single chaps present would far outweigh the couples/ladies wouldn't it? We recently spoke with a couple who told us of a social they had attended where there were 60 blokes and only 4 couples. This seems no good. It cant be a free for all can it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Anyone who uses the excuse of organising a social to pick and choose who gets to attend should be left to it, there are many other socials out there that are much, much more inclusive and friendly. We would take issue with you here. Surely an element of control over the proportions of those attending is a necessary evil? Otherwise the balance of single chaps present would far outweigh the couples/ladies wouldn't it? We recently spoke with a couple who told us of a social they had attended where there were 60 blokes and only 4 couples. This seems no good. It cant be a free for all can it? " I disagree with you on this point. I think that organised socials are for like-minded people to meet and chat and socialise. An event that is open to all will attract attendees in similar proportions to the fab membership, and that's fine. After all, it's not an orgy or sex party ... well I hope not, if it's in a public pub! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Anyone who uses the excuse of organising a social to pick and choose who gets to attend should be left to it, there are many other socials out there that are much, much more inclusive and friendly. We would take issue with you here. Surely an element of control over the proportions of those attending is a necessary evil? Otherwise the balance of single chaps present would far outweigh the couples/ladies wouldn't it? We recently spoke with a couple who told us of a social they had attended where there were 60 blokes and only 4 couples. This seems no good. It cant be a free for all can it? I disagree with you on this point. I think that organised socials are for like-minded people to meet and chat and socialise. An event that is open to all will attract attendees in similar proportions to the fab membership, and that's fine. After all, it's not an orgy or sex party ... well I hope not, if it's in a public pub!" Every single social we have attended from a small country pub to the Tea Party & MLS has an element of controlling the numbers. We’ve never seen it as a bad thing & all at these socials have been friendly. I doubt it would be the same with no controls in place over who attends. To prove this could S&H advise how many couples & single ladies attended who were NOT on the guest list as against how many guys arrived who were not invited? S | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Anyone who uses the excuse of organising a social to pick and choose who gets to attend should be left to it, there are many other socials out there that are much, much more inclusive and friendly. We would take issue with you here. Surely an element of control over the proportions of those attending is a necessary evil? Otherwise the balance of single chaps present would far outweigh the couples/ladies wouldn't it? We recently spoke with a couple who told us of a social they had attended where there were 60 blokes and only 4 couples. This seems no good. It cant be a free for all can it? I disagree with you on this point. I think that organised socials are for like-minded people to meet and chat and socialise. An event that is open to all will attract attendees in similar proportions to the fab membership, and that's fine. After all, it's not an orgy or sex party ... well I hope not, if it's in a public pub! Every single social we have attended from a small country pub to the Tea Party & MLS has an element of controlling the numbers. We’ve never seen it as a bad thing & all at these socials have been friendly. I doubt it would be the same with no controls in place over who attends. To prove this could S&H advise how many couples & single ladies attended who were NOT on the guest list as against how many guys arrived who were not invited? S" Having control by having a vetted door list is an advantage of hiring a small venue, a function or meeting room, and is a sensible way of restricting access to anyone who wants to gatecrash. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Anyone who uses the excuse of organising a social to pick and choose who gets to attend should be left to it, there are many other socials out there that are much, much more inclusive and friendly. We would take issue with you here. Surely an element of control over the proportions of those attending is a necessary evil? Otherwise the balance of single chaps present would far outweigh the couples/ladies wouldn't it? We recently spoke with a couple who told us of a social they had attended where there were 60 blokes and only 4 couples. This seems no good. It cant be a free for all can it? I disagree with you on this point. I think that organised socials are for like-minded people to meet and chat and socialise. An event that is open to all will attract attendees in similar proportions to the fab membership, and that's fine. After all, it's not an orgy or sex party ... well I hope not, if it's in a public pub! Every single social we have attended from a small country pub to the Tea Party & MLS has an element of controlling the numbers. We’ve never seen it as a bad thing & all at these socials have been friendly. I doubt it would be the same with no controls in place over who attends. To prove this could S&H advise how many couples & single ladies attended who were NOT on the guest list as against how many guys arrived who were not invited? S Having control by having a vetted door list is an advantage of hiring a small venue, a function or meeting room, and is a sensible way of restricting access to anyone who wants to gatecrash." Agreed but the MLS & Tea Parties are held in pubs & i’m pretty sure there have been no issues with either gatecrashers or other pub goers. Maybe the fact the location does not stay the same is the answer? Easy in Manchester or London, Not so easy in Carmarthen though. S | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Anyone who uses the excuse of organising a social to pick and choose who gets to attend should be left to it, there are many other socials out there that are much, much more inclusive and friendly. We would take issue with you here. Surely an element of control over the proportions of those attending is a necessary evil? Otherwise the balance of single chaps present would far outweigh the couples/ladies wouldn't it? We recently spoke with a couple who told us of a social they had attended where there were 60 blokes and only 4 couples. This seems no good. It cant be a free for all can it? I disagree with you on this point. I think that organised socials are for like-minded people to meet and chat and socialise. An event that is open to all will attract attendees in similar proportions to the fab membership, and that's fine. After all, it's not an orgy or sex party ... well I hope not, if it's in a public pub! Every single social we have attended from a small country pub to the Tea Party & MLS has an element of controlling the numbers. We’ve never seen it as a bad thing & all at these socials have been friendly. I doubt it would be the same with no controls in place over who attends. To prove this could S&H advise how many couples & single ladies attended who were NOT on the guest list as against how many guys arrived who were not invited? S" The mixture of females and couples amounted to 51 in total as for the guys who attended uninvited we would say that the number was at least 10 who decided to make negative statements to the couples especially. S&H | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Anyone who uses the excuse of organising a social to pick and choose who gets to attend should be left to it, there are many other socials out there that are much, much more inclusive and friendly. We would take issue with you here. Surely an element of control over the proportions of those attending is a necessary evil? Otherwise the balance of single chaps present would far outweigh the couples/ladies wouldn't it? We recently spoke with a couple who told us of a social they had attended where there were 60 blokes and only 4 couples. This seems no good. It cant be a free for all can it? I disagree with you on this point. I think that organised socials are for like-minded people to meet and chat and socialise. An event that is open to all will attract attendees in similar proportions to the fab membership, and that's fine. After all, it's not an orgy or sex party ... well I hope not, if it's in a public pub! Every single social we have attended from a small country pub to the Tea Party & MLS has an element of controlling the numbers. We’ve never seen it as a bad thing & all at these socials have been friendly. I doubt it would be the same with no controls in place over who attends. To prove this could S&H advise how many couples & single ladies attended who were NOT on the guest list as against how many guys arrived who were not invited? S The mixture of females and couples amounted to 51 in total as for the guys who attended uninvited we would say that the number was at least 10 who decided to make negative statements to the couples especially. S&H" We omitted to say that no couples or single females arrived uninvited. S&H | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Anyone who uses the excuse of organising a social to pick and choose who gets to attend should be left to it, there are many other socials out there that are much, much more inclusive and friendly. We would take issue with you here. Surely an element of control over the proportions of those attending is a necessary evil? Otherwise the balance of single chaps present would far outweigh the couples/ladies wouldn't it? We recently spoke with a couple who told us of a social they had attended where there were 60 blokes and only 4 couples. This seems no good. It cant be a free for all can it? I disagree with you on this point. I think that organised socials are for like-minded people to meet and chat and socialise. An event that is open to all will attract attendees in similar proportions to the fab membership, and that's fine. After all, it's not an orgy or sex party ... well I hope not, if it's in a public pub! Every single social we have attended from a small country pub to the Tea Party & MLS has an element of controlling the numbers. We’ve never seen it as a bad thing & all at these socials have been friendly. I doubt it would be the same with no controls in place over who attends. To prove this could S&H advise how many couples & single ladies attended who were NOT on the guest list as against how many guys arrived who were not invited? S The mixture of females and couples amounted to 51 in total as for the guys who attended uninvited we would say that the number was at least 10 who decided to make negative statements to the couples especially. S&H We omitted to say that no couples or single females arrived uninvited. S&H " Says everything really. x S | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Anyone who uses the excuse of organising a social to pick and choose who gets to attend should be left to it, there are many other socials out there that are much, much more inclusive and friendly. We would take issue with you here. Surely an element of control over the proportions of those attending is a necessary evil? Otherwise the balance of single chaps present would far outweigh the couples/ladies wouldn't it? We recently spoke with a couple who told us of a social they had attended where there were 60 blokes and only 4 couples. This seems no good. It cant be a free for all can it? I disagree with you on this point. I think that organised socials are for like-minded people to meet and chat and socialise. An event that is open to all will attract attendees in similar proportions to the fab membership, and that's fine. After all, it's not an orgy or sex party ... well I hope not, if it's in a public pub!" I agree with Rosie here I ran the Neath Day social for a few years and never limited or excluded anyone based on gender, relationship status or anything else. The numbers always seemed fairly balanced and as it was purely a social event, why would it matter if there were more men, more couples, more women etc than others?? The single men always seemed quite capable of socialising with each other aswell as the couples and women. You will often find that a proportion of single guys who say they will attend won't show anyway. I am just glad it never seemed to attract the amount of hassle that this one seems to have ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |