Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Wales |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Rather a well written thoughtful _rofile than to be photo verified. .. then again lot of written word is fake. .. " Definitely prefer a written _rofile, more than a couple of lines is something. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well what about being a site supporter before they can msg then. Will stop a lot of chancers joining and messaging on there day off " 100%+ in agreement | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Card payment only, with minimum of silver site support to send messages. People will think twice about joining up, especially if they got a joint bank account. " Card payment won't work people will just buy prepaid, I'm not any of the above but I'm also not a site supporter, I was for many months but I just found that all you generally get extra is seeing people who have viewed you, it's not that I'm not enjoying the site it's just a lot to pay every month to see who has viewed you. As a supporter I do every so months do it just to put a bit of money into it, but in the real world if everyone had to sign up to a card I think you would find a lot of people leave, and that wouldn't help fab to be able to run this well...fab lol. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well what about being a site supporter before they can msg then. Will stop a lot of chancers joining and messaging on there day off " Totally this. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Card payment only, with minimum of silver site support to send messages. People will think twice about joining up, especially if they got a joint bank account. " Totally this as well. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Card payment only, with minimum of silver site support to send messages. People will think twice about joining up, especially if they got a joint bank account. Card payment won't work people will just buy prepaid, I'm not any of the above but I'm also not a site supporter, I was for many months but I just found that all you generally get extra is seeing people who have viewed you, it's not that I'm not enjoying the site it's just a lot to pay every month to see who has viewed you. As a supporter I do every so months do it just to put a bit of money into it, but in the real world if everyone had to sign up to a card I think you would find a lot of people leave, and that wouldn't help fab to be able to run this well...fab lol. " We'd rather fewer members, but more genuine members. Quality over quantity. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Payment does not have to be made by a debit or credit card,you can charge the amounts to your mobile phone account and perhaps the Forums should be for paying members only resulting in more revenue for the site and better overall facilities. " I thought he wanted just card payment. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have never paid by card and probably would not be happy doing so,hence I always have paid via my phone account and paid since the day I actually joined " That's my point, if you do "card only" you might put off good people like yourself. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Card payment only, with minimum of silver site support to send messages. People will think twice about joining up, especially if they got a joint bank account. Card payment won't work people will just buy prepaid, I'm not any of the above but I'm also not a site supporter, I was for many months but I just found that all you generally get extra is seeing people who have viewed you, it's not that I'm not enjoying the site it's just a lot to pay every month to see who has viewed you. As a supporter I do every so months do it just to put a bit of money into it, but in the real world if everyone had to sign up to a card I think you would find a lot of people leave, and that wouldn't help fab to be able to run this well...fab lol. " what £2.50 a month | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Card payment only, with minimum of silver site support to send messages. People will think twice about joining up, especially if they got a joint bank account. " What about those that might not have a spare fiver or more. Depending on the payment method. Or are skint people not allowed sex lives? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Card payment only, with minimum of silver site support to send messages. People will think twice about joining up, especially if they got a joint bank account. Card payment won't work people will just buy prepaid, I'm not any of the above but I'm also not a site supporter, I was for many months but I just found that all you generally get extra is seeing people who have viewed you, it's not that I'm not enjoying the site it's just a lot to pay every month to see who has viewed you. As a supporter I do every so months do it just to put a bit of money into it, but in the real world if everyone had to sign up to a card I think you would find a lot of people leave, and that wouldn't help fab to be able to run this well...fab lol. what £2.50 a month " None of the options are “£2.50 a month” they’re lump sums. Some people watch every penny. Some months I certainly have too as I don’t work regular hours so can’t never be sure of my income. Does that mean I’m a fake and shouldn’t be allowed on the forums or to message people? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry but if nobody paid there would not be a Fabswingers website " No one is saying don’t pay. It seems to work perfectly fine with some paying and some not. Why make it compulsory? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry but if nobody paid there would not be a Fabswingers website No one is saying don’t pay. It seems to work perfectly fine with some paying and some not. Why make it compulsory? " Why not | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry but if nobody paid there would not be a Fabswingers website No one is saying don’t pay. It seems to work perfectly fine with some paying and some not. Why make it compulsory? Why not " Because some people don’t want to pay. I have because I could afford it at the time. If I can’t afford it when it’s up, should I not be allowed to message people? “Why not?” Isn’t an answer. I’ve yet to see a valid reason for making everyone pay other than people think it MIGHT stop timewasters. I’ve been messed around by people with meet veris and who are site supporters. It’s not a guarantee of anything. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well a gold membership costs under seventeen pence a day and the silver membership costs only ten pence per day,if people cannot afford to pay those small amounts then they are not financially capable of socialising or actually meeting " I find that pretty darned offensive as neither socialising or meeting cost anything at all to be fair. But to place emphasis on people who pay to use the site as being somehow more "genuine" or somehow more "preferable" swingers/members is also quite offensive. If you are genuine, it shows through whether or not you have a shiny icon next to your name showing that you have paid some money for a website's additional functions. Plus people who have no desire except for messing people around can easily afford the as you put it "ten pence per day" in order to have their laughs. It solves nothing putting a financial barrier there. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well a gold membership costs under seventeen pence a day and the silver membership costs only ten pence per day,if people cannot afford to pay those small amounts then they are not financially capable of socialising or actually meeting I find that pretty darned offensive as neither socialising or meeting cost anything at all to be fair. But to place emphasis on people who pay to use the site as being somehow more "genuine" or somehow more "preferable" swingers/members is also quite offensive. If you are genuine, it shows through whether or not you have a shiny icon next to your name showing that you have paid some money for a website's additional functions. Plus people who have no desire except for messing people around can easily afford the as you put it "ten pence per day" in order to have their laughs. It solves nothing putting a financial barrier there. " Plus it’s not “17p a day” is it? It’s a lump sum. Socials arent the beall and end all of fab. If someone can accommodate how does that make them incapable of meeting? Or if they can drive? Plenty of people live paycheque to paycheque and personally I’d rather put £20 of fuel in my car to get to meet than pay it out for a pass that does nothing but give you a few extra pictures. Or even £30 on a hotel room, which is more beneficial to actually meeting on fab than a little gold or silver medal on your _rofile. Everything can be broken down into pence a day. If it’s not paid daily then however much it costs a day is completely irrelevant. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well a gold membership costs under seventeen pence a day and the silver membership costs only ten pence per day,if people cannot afford to pay those small amounts then they are not financially capable of socialising or actually meeting I find that pretty darned offensive as neither socialising or meeting cost anything at all to be fair. But to place emphasis on people who pay to use the site as being somehow more "genuine" or somehow more "preferable" swingers/members is also quite offensive. If you are genuine, it shows through whether or not you have a shiny icon next to your name showing that you have paid some money for a website's additional functions. Plus people who have no desire except for messing people around can easily afford the as you put it "ten pence per day" in order to have their laughs. It solves nothing putting a financial barrier there. Plus it’s not “17p a day” is it? It’s a lump sum. Socials arent the beall and end all of fab. If someone can accommodate how does that make them incapable of meeting? Or if they can drive? Plenty of people live paycheque to paycheque and personally I’d rather put £20 of fuel in my car to get to meet than pay it out for a pass that does nothing but give you a few extra pictures. Or even £30 on a hotel room, which is more beneficial to actually meeting on fab than a little gold or silver medal on your _rofile. Everything can be broken down into pence a day. If it’s not paid daily then however much it costs a day is completely irrelevant. " If a fiver is a lump sum I just wouldn't think that you would be a good drinking partner,more the case the site has overheads to pay and if nobody paid there just wouldn't be a Forum or for that matter a website | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well a gold membership costs under seventeen pence a day and the silver membership costs only ten pence per day,if people cannot afford to pay those small amounts then they are not financially capable of socialising or actually meeting I find that pretty darned offensive as neither socialising or meeting cost anything at all to be fair. But to place emphasis on people who pay to use the site as being somehow more "genuine" or somehow more "preferable" swingers/members is also quite offensive. If you are genuine, it shows through whether or not you have a shiny icon next to your name showing that you have paid some money for a website's additional functions. Plus people who have no desire except for messing people around can easily afford the as you put it "ten pence per day" in order to have their laughs. It solves nothing putting a financial barrier there. Plus it’s not “17p a day” is it? It’s a lump sum. Socials arent the beall and end all of fab. If someone can accommodate how does that make them incapable of meeting? Or if they can drive? Plenty of people live paycheque to paycheque and personally I’d rather put £20 of fuel in my car to get to meet than pay it out for a pass that does nothing but give you a few extra pictures. Or even £30 on a hotel room, which is more beneficial to actually meeting on fab than a little gold or silver medal on your _rofile. Everything can be broken down into pence a day. If it’s not paid daily then however much it costs a day is completely irrelevant. If a fiver is a lump sum I just wouldn't think that you would be a good drinking partner,more the case the site has overheads to pay and if nobody paid there just wouldn't be a Forum or for that matter a website " If it helps, why not change your settings to only being contacted/viewed and visa/versa to site supporters, see if it works out differently? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well a gold membership costs under seventeen pence a day and the silver membership costs only ten pence per day,if people cannot afford to pay those small amounts then they are not financially capable of socialising or actually meeting I find that pretty darned offensive as neither socialising or meeting cost anything at all to be fair. But to place emphasis on people who pay to use the site as being somehow more "genuine" or somehow more "preferable" swingers/members is also quite offensive. If you are genuine, it shows through whether or not you have a shiny icon next to your name showing that you have paid some money for a website's additional functions. Plus people who have no desire except for messing people around can easily afford the as you put it "ten pence per day" in order to have their laughs. It solves nothing putting a financial barrier there. " My long term stalker thought nothing of joining several times per day & paying the fee to by pass my filters, none of these things will improve a pile of shite. Not that I'm saying the site is a pile of shite, far from it but some of the people, well... They pay & still | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well a gold membership costs under seventeen pence a day and the silver membership costs only ten pence per day,if people cannot afford to pay those small amounts then they are not financially capable of socialising or actually meeting I find that pretty darned offensive as neither socialising or meeting cost anything at all to be fair. But to place emphasis on people who pay to use the site as being somehow more "genuine" or somehow more "preferable" swingers/members is also quite offensive. If you are genuine, it shows through whether or not you have a shiny icon next to your name showing that you have paid some money for a website's additional functions. Plus people who have no desire except for messing people around can easily afford the as you put it "ten pence per day" in order to have their laughs. It solves nothing putting a financial barrier there. Plus it’s not “17p a day” is it? It’s a lump sum. Socials arent the beall and end all of fab. If someone can accommodate how does that make them incapable of meeting? Or if they can drive? Plenty of people live paycheque to paycheque and personally I’d rather put £20 of fuel in my car to get to meet than pay it out for a pass that does nothing but give you a few extra pictures. Or even £30 on a hotel room, which is more beneficial to actually meeting on fab than a little gold or silver medal on your _rofile. Everything can be broken down into pence a day. If it’s not paid daily then however much it costs a day is completely irrelevant. If a fiver is a lump sum I just wouldn't think that you would be a good drinking partner,more the case the site has overheads to pay and if nobody paid there just wouldn't be a Forum or for that matter a website " If you pay via text. Other payment methods are more. It helps if you actually know what you’re talking about when trying to tell people their wrong. And no one has said don’t pay. Those who pay do and those who don’t don’t. But forcing people to pay to be able to message? No. It doesn’t stop timewasters. There’s no need for it. There’s such a stuck up attitude from some people on here. As if their way of using the site is the only correct way. It works as it is. You get meet verified people that will mess you around and waste your time. Of them being verified as meeting doesn’t stop it then making people pay won’t either. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well a gold membership costs under seventeen pence a day and the silver membership costs only ten pence per day,if people cannot afford to pay those small amounts then they are not financially capable of socialising or actually meeting I find that pretty darned offensive as neither socialising or meeting cost anything at all to be fair. But to place emphasis on people who pay to use the site as being somehow more "genuine" or somehow more "preferable" swingers/members is also quite offensive. If you are genuine, it shows through whether or not you have a shiny icon next to your name showing that you have paid some money for a website's additional functions. Plus people who have no desire except for messing people around can easily afford the as you put it "ten pence per day" in order to have their laughs. It solves nothing putting a financial barrier there. My long term stalker thought nothing of joining several times per day & paying the fee to by pass my filters, none of these things will improve a pile of shite. Not that I'm saying the site is a pile of shite, far from it but some of the people, well... They pay & still " Exactly. If someone wants to mess people around they’ll pay to do so. It’s not a magical cure all and money shouldn’t be a requirement of having a sex life. Unless you’re into that sort of thing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well a gold membership costs under seventeen pence a day and the silver membership costs only ten pence per day,if people cannot afford to pay those small amounts then they are not financially capable of socialising or actually meeting I find that pretty darned offensive as neither socialising or meeting cost anything at all to be fair. But to place emphasis on people who pay to use the site as being somehow more "genuine" or somehow more "preferable" swingers/members is also quite offensive. If you are genuine, it shows through whether or not you have a shiny icon next to your name showing that you have paid some money for a website's additional functions. Plus people who have no desire except for messing people around can easily afford the as you put it "ten pence per day" in order to have their laughs. It solves nothing putting a financial barrier there. My long term stalker thought nothing of joining several times per day & paying the fee to by pass my filters, none of these things will improve a pile of shite. Not that I'm saying the site is a pile of shite, far from it but some of the people, well... They pay & still " Spot on | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |