FabSwingers.com forum: What's the difference

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Ok guys call me thick but I fail to see the difference between bareback penetration sex and bareback oral.

Surely both involve the transfer of bodily fluids, ok oral not so much, between 2 or more people.

So if somebody insists on protected sex why unprotected oral.

This probably isn't written right. But you get the gist of it.

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If you search for this topic in the forum you'll find lots of information, I won't comment though, learnt my lesson last time, some people don't like an informed response x

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would suggest you go back to basic. This was taught in school well was when I was there.

Oral sex is regarded as relatively low risk. Due to the presents of silva, type of skin and speed of healing.

Virginal anal high are classed as high risk as due to direct entry into the body and the type of skin. If my memory serves me right it's more a type of membrane which absorbs more also greater risk of damage and bleeding.

To get accurate information though you should really go to some sort of sexual health site and get your facts straight and access the risks for yourself.

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I would suggest you go back to basic. This was taught in school well was when I was there.

Oral sex is regarded as relatively low risk. Due to the presents of silva, type of skin and speed of healing.

To get accurate information though you should really go to some sort of sexual health site and get your facts straight and access the risks for yourself."