Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Wales |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The painting is about 20 years old. I remember the controversy at the time. Personally, I didn't find it exploitative - I did think it was a worthwhile albeit controversial, piece of art. It did make me think a lot. However, that's just me and I can quite see and accept that others would take a very different viewpoint. " i understand your view point .i didn't know it was that old .naive i suppose but i just think did they think how the victims parents would ave felt when they done it ? I know art is about pushing boundaries and being controversial at times . Its just i watched it again tonight and it still fills me full of emotion for those poor victims and their families but perhaps thats the point they doing it for? Poppyxx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I know art is about pushing boundaries and being controversial at times . Its just i watched it again tonight and it still fills me full of emotion for those poor victims and their families but perhaps thats the point they doing it for? Poppyxx " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think some art is done purely for exploitation. I didn't feel this was at the time. I remember thinking it was really powerful, but i did question whether i should be thinking like that. However,'I couldnt stop myself thinking it was an incredibly powerful statement about the innocence of childhood/loss of that innocence. I think art should challenge, provoke, stimulate debate. Otherwise we end up with a sea of blandness. For me, this is the "right side of the line" because of the debate it spawned in my head. I can see it the other way though. Having said that, I know I'd feel different if my child had been killed. In a similar vein, I also know that I'm anti-capital punishment, but I'd happily kill someone who murdered my child. " i understand your statement totally and can see the points you raise about art and portrayal of that .however if i was one of these victims family though i not i would take offence to it. Perhaps its meant to be powerful but how more powerful do you have to be be in life than to take several children's lifes away ? Thats too powerful any way and to pay homage to it is sick i feel.i understand they still want to keep the fact they did raw . But I think they don't have to do it that way. I think empathy is there all the way in the very public eye towards the victims and their families .i got asked the other day by some one who is Myra Hindley ? When I mentioned it. So i suppose therefore goes the reason .xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |