Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Virus |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes I'd take that vaccination " 
I like how they can use good prediction techniques, to evaluate the most likely dangerous risks for us, for viruses that could both rip through a population of billions of people without immunity, as well as with severe illness etc.
They can predict mutations in advance too, so that people could have immunity to a mutation before it ever arises. The new technology, multiviral Quartet Nanocages, is published as "Proactive vaccination using multiviral Quartet Nanocages to elicit broad anti-coronavirus responses', for anyone wanting to explore further. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes I'd take that vaccination
I like how they can use good prediction techniques, to evaluate the most likely dangerous risks for us, for viruses that could both rip through a population of billions of people without immunity, as well as with severe illness etc.
They can predict mutations in advance too, so that people could have immunity to a mutation before it ever arises. The new technology, multiviral Quartet Nanocages, is published as "Proactive vaccination using multiviral Quartet Nanocages to elicit broad anti-coronavirus responses', for anyone wanting to explore further. "I don't pretend to understand the science behind this but I'm very glad that there are people who do | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes I'd take that vaccination
I like how they can use good prediction techniques, to evaluate the most likely dangerous risks for us, for viruses that could both rip through a population of billions of people without immunity, as well as with severe illness etc.
They can predict mutations in advance too, so that people could have immunity to a mutation before it ever arises. The new technology, multiviral Quartet Nanocages, is published as "Proactive vaccination using multiviral Quartet Nanocages to elicit broad anti-coronavirus responses', for anyone wanting to explore further.
I don't pretend to understand the science behind this but I'm very glad that there are people who do"
We're so fortunate that we have so many gifted people, also helped by imagination, to conceive of new ways to develop solutions to an ever increasing range of threats
The pandemic showed this greatest of humanity, with global collaboration, across disciplines that don't usually get to establish such close cooperation.
With this new technology, we could be shielded from threats that may otherwise be devastating. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes I'd take that vaccination
I like how they can use good prediction techniques, to evaluate the most likely dangerous risks for us, for viruses that could both rip through a population of billions of people without immunity, as well as with severe illness etc.
They can predict mutations in advance too, so that people could have immunity to a mutation before it ever arises. The new technology, multiviral Quartet Nanocages, is published as "Proactive vaccination using multiviral Quartet Nanocages to elicit broad anti-coronavirus responses', for anyone wanting to explore further.
I don't pretend to understand the science behind this but I'm very glad that there are people who do
We're so fortunate that we have so many gifted people, also helped by imagination, to conceive of new ways to develop solutions to an ever increasing range of threats
The pandemic showed this greatest of humanity, with global collaboration, across disciplines that don't usually get to establish such close cooperation.
With this new technology, we could be shielded from threats that may otherwise be devastating. "I agree. We've come a long way from the first cowpox trials | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No thanks " But it makes your cock bigger too.... Even if you don't have one. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I like the concept, but for me I don't see the value of developing a vaccine against things that don't exist... just in case. There are loads of viruses that do exist that need a vaccine. Things like Dengue, Malaria, Chagas, and Aids would really benefit from a concentration of vaccine development resources. Cal" Got it in one. Emperors new others I fear. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I like the concept, but for me I don't see the value of developing a vaccine against things that don't exist... just in case. There are loads of viruses that do exist that need a vaccine. Things like Dengue, Malaria, Chagas, and Aids would really benefit from a concentration of vaccine development resources. Cal ----- Got it in one. Emperors new others I fear. " I'm not sure it's that either. Often scientists do things totally for "science" reasons. Their efforts might not produce a viable end product, but the research will yield tonnes of useful data and potentially make the production of other vaccines quicker. Obviously there's always been the pipe dream of a silver bullet cure all drug that will wipe out all diseases everywhere... but that's likely to always be out of reach. Cal | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I like the concept, but for me I don't see the value of developing a vaccine against things that don't exist... just in case. There are loads of viruses that do exist that need a vaccine. Things like Dengue, Malaria, Chagas, and Aids would really benefit from a concentration of vaccine development resources. Cal" From the op it's only got potential to protect against things that don't exist yet. As I said, I know next to nothing about these things but if while being vaccinated against existing infections there's a possibility I'd also have some protection against future infections I'd happily take it. Providing it was fully researched and tested | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I like the concept, but for me I don't see the value of developing a vaccine against things that don't exist... just in case. There are loads of viruses that do exist that need a vaccine. Things like Dengue, Malaria, Chagas, and Aids would really benefit from a concentration of vaccine development resources. Cal Got it in one. Emperors new others I fear. " The vaccine isn't largely expected to be for unknown viruses, though could be, should several imminent threats be seen. The testing was done against Sars 1 and 2, plus flu. They develop the protein targets of the viruses to be immunised against and then the collection of them are included. Immunity then builds and was seen to be very strong. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No doubt the anti Vaxxers will utilise their usual levels of superior intellect to distract from innovation lol" Why? Bit unnecessarily offensive. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read somewhere the Chinese are working on a new strain of Ebola, lets hope that one doesn't eacape through a leak from a lab." But think of the money to be made. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Domestos kills 99% of all known Germs but what about the 1% it doesn't and all the unknown ones I always think." It's actually 99.9%, but only because they don't want to claim 100% and then have someone find something that was missed | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No doubt the anti Vaxxers will utilise their usual levels of superior intellect to distract from innovation lol Why? Bit unnecessarily offensive. " True though | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read somewhere the Chinese are working on a new strain of Ebola, lets hope that one doesn't eacape through a leak from a lab." Yes it's being used to provide data for the "universal" vaccine. Labs continually experiment with various virus all over the world, even the UK | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find the science amazing but, at the moment, I would decline. Too much, too soon, I feel a little overwhelmed post Covid." You're fine! . This is just preliminary trialling of new technological development, that can eventually join the other fantastic vaccine gains we've had. They've shown that this newer technology can get real bodies to produce immunity against multiple different viruses, from proteins. There'll be lots more development and testing, before the public may ever get a chance to benefit from it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find the science amazing but, at the moment, I would decline. Too much, too soon, I feel a little overwhelmed post Covid." This one's a long way off, COVID vaccines were given unique pretty much unlimited government funding, normally it's all paid for by research grants from pharmaceutical companies and takes decades. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So Domestos kills 99% of all known Germs but what about the 1% it doesn't and all the unknown ones I always think." It did a good job on covid apparently.... If only there were, ya know, some way to bring it into contact with the virus in the body | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No doubt the anti Vaxxers will utilise their usual levels of superior intellect to distract from innovation lol Why? Bit unnecessarily offensive. True though" What's true? That it's unnecessary and offensive? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No doubt the anti Vaxxers will utilise their usual levels of superior intellect to distract from innovation lol Why? Bit unnecessarily offensive. True though What's true? That it's unnecessary and offensive? " Nope | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A new vaccine type has been developed and tested in mice, which produces immunity against many viruses, including potentially those yet to infect humans. Its special technology has multiple threat proteins, which then stimulate antibody/immunity development. They incorporated Sars 1 and 2, as well as flu protein surface proteins. Whilst not universal protection, you could produce immunity against a dozen, potentially more viruses that could attack you, per injection. Would you be eager to help fight off future potential infections and viruses, assuming safety is evaluated? It's exciting that we're developing some good ways to help to keep people and animals safer, against the many zoonotic viruses that could jump between species. " I refused to have the Covid clot shot, so I definitely ain't going to volunteer for their latest "invention" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No doubt the anti Vaxxers will utilise their usual levels of superior intellect to distract from innovation lol" I will give it a miss thanks. I refused the convid clot shots, and I'm as healthy as I was before the plandemic. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find the science amazing but, at the moment, I would decline. Too much, too soon, I feel a little overwhelmed post Covid. You're fine! . This is just preliminary trialling of new technological development, that can eventually join the other fantastic vaccine gains we've had. They've shown that this newer technology can get real bodies to produce immunity against multiple different viruses, from proteins. There'll be lots more development and testing, before the public may ever get a chance to benefit from it. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A new vaccine type has been developed and tested in mice, which produces immunity against many viruses, including potentially those yet to infect humans. Its special technology has multiple threat proteins, which then stimulate antibody/immunity development. They incorporated Sars 1 and 2, as well as flu protein surface proteins. Whilst not universal protection, you could produce immunity against a dozen, potentially more viruses that could attack you, per injection. Would you be eager to help fight off future potential infections and viruses, assuming safety is evaluated? It's exciting that we're developing some good ways to help to keep people and animals safer, against the many zoonotic viruses that could jump between species. I refused to have the Covid clot shot, so I definitely ain't going to volunteer for their latest "invention" " It's extremely unlikely you'd be asked | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
