Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Virus |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So how do we all feel about Boris’s announcement" I'll take a look in the Politics forum. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So how do we all feel about Boris’s announcement" What announcement? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is my belief that Boris brushes his hair with a balloon…" I think it's a Minky Mop masquerading as a hair piece. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So how do we all feel about Boris’s announcement" Not another baby? Surely FFS, he's breeding a full back bench, dirty bugger. Carrie sure likes her Blue Sausage.. Keeps party membership levels up for the future too!! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So how do we all feel about Boris’s announcement" Personally I think that it's too early, but I think it is all about reducing the cost of having so many people off work ill. Cal | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best news in a long time. Let's get on with life." Agreed!! Let’s hope old lady drakeford follows suit ASAP! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So how do we all feel about Boris’s announcement Personally I think that it's too early, but I think it is all about reducing the cost of having so many people off work ill. Cal"  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It’s good news, a step forward that puts us closer to getting on with life, however …. … the bloke is still a lying cheating self obsessed twat who has no moral compass and has to go before I will ever vote Tory again! R xx" He is. But we’d never be getting back to normal life so fast if he wasn’t. So it’s quite handy! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Removing the free testing is a mistake as it reduces people's ability to establish if they have covid, and that will have an impact on their decision to isolate." Back in the days of.... you feel sick you stay home. No need to be told no need to test. Not too difficult really.  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Removing the free testing is a mistake as it reduces people's ability to establish if they have covid, and that will have an impact on their decision to isolate." Does it really matter – the majority of people don’t even though they’ve got it and are wandering around. The number of people that are in the bracket of might have it but not quite sure, wish I could do a test to find out – is actually pretty low. Most people will either be asymptomatic or no they have it (although they have something that makes them feel rough) and go back to bed | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
 . It was to satisfy demands from his extremist backbenchers, to potentially stop any more letters of no confidence in him. The other millions affected are the cannon fodder, of no concern to him.
He's yet again imposed risk levels that are ill-advised. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Best news in a long time. Let's get on with life. Agreed!! Let’s hope old lady drakeford follows suit ASAP! " I couldn’t agree more Miss pc | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Yeah you’re right. We should live in fear forever, pay to test everyone forever and expect the younger generations to foot the bill Time to move on and get on with things. " It could be cost neutral as a reduction in average life expectancy will reduce the pensions burden on society. Moving on and letting COVID run unchecked sounds like a plan. The currently variant has become less aggressive. Let's hope that while it spreads unchecked it doesn't mutate into something nasty again. After two years it would be a shame to make careless mistakes now that take us back to a lockdown situation again. I ask myself if the decision to change policy was made based on science or bravado. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence" Rats and cockroaches are the great survivors. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence" What are you taking about ?  
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Removing the free testing is a mistake as it reduces people's ability to establish if they have covid, and that will have an impact on their decision to isolate. Back in the days of.... you feel sick you stay home. No need to be told no need to test. Not too difficult really. "It sounds like you're fortune enough to be paid if you're off work sick. That does make the decision easier. But what about considering the situation for a person on low income that is not paid if they don't work. Assume the worst, you have COVID, and stay at home to protect others and don't get paid for a week. Or Convince yourself it can't be COVID, you need the money to pay the bills and buy food, I'll have to go to work. It'll be ok, won't it. Sometimes the choices aren't always easy and other factors will drive us down the wrong path. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It’s good news, a step forward that puts us closer to getting on with life, however …. … the bloke is still a lying cheating self obsessed twat who has no moral compass and has to go before I will ever vote Tory again! R xx" And the alternative is? Hahahaha | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence" Strange isn't it? Overall less people died in the last 2 years than average | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence Strange isn't it? Overall less people died in the last 2 years than average " One large category where there wasn't the normal expected number of deaths was pneumonia and influenza. Those deaths prevented by the use of masks, social distancing and the lockdowns. It is one tiny bit of good news. The death rate of those with missed diagnosis of cancers and delayed treatment of various serious conditions is likely to lead to a spike in deaths in future years. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence Strange isn't it? Overall less people died in the last 2 years than average One large category where there wasn't the normal expected number of deaths was pneumonia and influenza. Those deaths prevented by the use of masks, social distancing and the lockdowns. It is one tiny bit of good news. The death rate of those with missed diagnosis of cancers and delayed treatment of various serious conditions is likely to lead to a spike in deaths in future years. " Years 2020 and 2021 highest total deaths in uk for a long while, note the population number increases over time. The actual mortality rates are a lot higher than anything over the last 20 years especially 2020. Yes flu deaths were low the last 2 years due to hygiene measures and extra vaccination but they have been lower occasionally in the past. I agree cancer deaths will increase in the future,but for young people there has been significant drop in deaths lower murders suicide and motor accidents. I think the biggest threat to life expectancy is the long term lung heart and kidney damage done by covid. With regards to the OPs point boris had to gamble open things up for 3 reasons the population was getting fatigued, to keep business and his back benchers happy and most importantly to him to try and keep his job. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence Strange isn't it? Overall less people died in the last 2 years than average " They didn't | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why anyone would listen to or believe a word that comes out of his lying flip flopping unreliable flakey head il never know" I’ve often fantasised about swinging a cricket bat at it | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence Strange isn't it? Overall less people died in the last 2 years than average One large category where there wasn't the normal expected number of deaths was pneumonia and influenza. Those deaths prevented by the use of masks, social distancing and the lockdowns. It is one tiny bit of good news. The death rate of those with missed diagnosis of cancers and delayed treatment of various serious conditions is likely to lead to a spike in deaths in future years. " And that is the fault of Boris? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence Strange isn't it? Overall less people died in the last 2 years than average One large category where there wasn't the normal expected number of deaths was pneumonia and influenza. Those deaths prevented by the use of masks, social distancing and the lockdowns. It is one tiny bit of good news. The death rate of those with missed diagnosis of cancers and delayed treatment of various serious conditions is likely to lead to a spike in deaths in future years. Years 2020 and 2021 highest total deaths in uk for a long while, note the population number increases over time. The actual mortality rates are a lot higher than anything over the last 20 years especially 2020. Yes flu deaths were low the last 2 years due to hygiene measures and extra vaccination but they have been lower occasionally in the past. I agree cancer deaths will increase in the future,but for young people there has been significant drop in deaths lower murders suicide and motor accidents. I think the biggest threat to life expectancy is the long term lung heart and kidney damage done by covid. With regards to the OPs point boris had to gamble open things up for 3 reasons the population was getting fatigued, to keep business and his back benchers happy and most importantly to him to try and keep his job." Over the last 61 years since 1960, 2020 was 22nd in mortality rates so why weren't we locked down down the other 21 higher mortality rated years. Don't need to take my word for it, check the ONS. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence Strange isn't it? Overall less people died in the last 2 years than average One large category where there wasn't the normal expected number of deaths was pneumonia and influenza. Those deaths prevented by the use of masks, social distancing and the lockdowns. It is one tiny bit of good news. The death rate of those with missed diagnosis of cancers and delayed treatment of various serious conditions is likely to lead to a spike in deaths in future years. Years 2020 and 2021 highest total deaths in uk for a long while, note the population number increases over time. The actual mortality rates are a lot higher than anything over the last 20 years especially 2020. Yes flu deaths were low the last 2 years due to hygiene measures and extra vaccination but they have been lower occasionally in the past. I agree cancer deaths will increase in the future,but for young people there has been significant drop in deaths lower murders suicide and motor accidents. I think the biggest threat to life expectancy is the long term lung heart and kidney damage done by covid. With regards to the OPs point boris had to gamble open things up for 3 reasons the population was getting fatigued, to keep business and his back benchers happy and most importantly to him to try and keep his job. Over the last 61 years since 1960, 2020 was 22nd in mortality rates so why weren't we locked down down the other 21 higher mortality rated years. Don't need to take my word for it, check the ONS. " We had no pandemics over the previous 60 years. In 2020 less people died due to lockdown so by your own argument lockdown worked Job done | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Never understood, and never will why decent hard working class people vote for the self obsessed self interested fuckers." Because they are hoodwinked by politicians into thinking they might do better for themselves (if such betterment is quantifiable in overall terms). I've always like the description of a snob as 'someone who wants to know people who don't want to know them'. A certain similarity of ambition exists where voting is concerned. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Don't you tory voters feel cheated now? Never understood, and never will why decent hard working class people vote for the self obsessed self interested fuckers." Not as I'm a tory voter anyway but what credible alternative is there. Please note the important word credible Course, you could have the like of Sir Talk Hindsight and of course, the wisdom of Diane Abbott. Bring in a coalition and bring in Mrs Drakeford, Wee Krankie and Chubby Blackford. Yes, that should do it | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence Strange isn't it? Overall less people died in the last 2 years than average One large category where there wasn't the normal expected number of deaths was pneumonia and influenza. Those deaths prevented by the use of masks, social distancing and the lockdowns. It is one tiny bit of good news. The death rate of those with missed diagnosis of cancers and delayed treatment of various serious conditions is likely to lead to a spike in deaths in future years. Years 2020 and 2021 highest total deaths in uk for a long while, note the population number increases over time. The actual mortality rates are a lot higher than anything over the last 20 years especially 2020. Yes flu deaths were low the last 2 years due to hygiene measures and extra vaccination but they have been lower occasionally in the past. I agree cancer deaths will increase in the future,but for young people there has been significant drop in deaths lower murders suicide and motor accidents. I think the biggest threat to life expectancy is the long term lung heart and kidney damage done by covid. With regards to the OPs point boris had to gamble open things up for 3 reasons the population was getting fatigued, to keep business and his back benchers happy and most importantly to him to try and keep his job. Over the last 61 years since 1960, 2020 was 22nd in mortality rates so why weren't we locked down down the other 21 higher mortality rated years. Don't need to take my word for it, check the ONS. We had no pandemics over the previous 60 years. In 2020 less people died due to lockdown so by your own argument lockdown worked Job done" Sounds like you've got the same reasoning ability as Putin | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I'm really amazed that it costs two billion a week for testing, that seems exorbitant." That’s because plumbers are doing it | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Don't you tory voters feel cheated now? Never understood, and never will why decent hard working class people vote for the self obsessed self interested fuckers. Not as I'm a tory voter anyway but what credible alternative is there. Please note the important word credible Course, you could have the like of Sir Talk Hindsight and of course, the wisdom of Diane Abbott. Bring in a coalition and bring in Mrs Drakeford, Wee Krankie and Chubby Blackford. Yes, that should do it " Sadly in England there are no credible parties to vote. so we are stuck with this lying thieving bunch of scumbags | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Don't you tory voters feel cheated now? Never understood, and never will why decent hard working class people vote for the self obsessed self interested fuckers. Not as I'm a tory voter anyway but what credible alternative is there. Please note the important word credible Course, you could have the like of Sir Talk Hindsight and of course, the wisdom of Diane Abbott. Bring in a coalition and bring in Mrs Drakeford, Wee Krankie and Chubby Blackford. Yes, that should do it Sadly in England there are no credible parties to vote. so we are stuck with this lying thieving bunch of scumbags" Ah so the other uk hang ons draining our resources do have credible alternatives then? Please name any | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence Strange isn't it? Overall less people died in the last 2 years than average One large category where there wasn't the normal expected number of deaths was pneumonia and influenza. Those deaths prevented by the use of masks, social distancing and the lockdowns. It is one tiny bit of good news. The death rate of those with missed diagnosis of cancers and delayed treatment of various serious conditions is likely to lead to a spike in deaths in future years. Years 2020 and 2021 highest total deaths in uk for a long while, note the population number increases over time. The actual mortality rates are a lot higher than anything over the last 20 years especially 2020. Yes flu deaths were low the last 2 years due to hygiene measures and extra vaccination but they have been lower occasionally in the past. I agree cancer deaths will increase in the future,but for young people there has been significant drop in deaths lower murders suicide and motor accidents. I think the biggest threat to life expectancy is the long term lung heart and kidney damage done by covid. With regards to the OPs point boris had to gamble open things up for 3 reasons the population was getting fatigued, to keep business and his back benchers happy and most importantly to him to try and keep his job. Over the last 61 years since 1960, 2020 was 22nd in mortality rates so why weren't we locked down down the other 21 higher mortality rated years. Don't need to take my word for it, check the ONS. " Death rates fell and life expectancy rose consistently from 1960 until 2012 when death rates crept and continued to rise, probably due to austerity measures. They then shot up in 2020 the figures for 2021 are also high but lower than 2020. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence Strange isn't it? Overall less people died in the last 2 years than average One large category where there wasn't the normal expected number of deaths was pneumonia and influenza. Those deaths prevented by the use of masks, social distancing and the lockdowns. It is one tiny bit of good news. The death rate of those with missed diagnosis of cancers and delayed treatment of various serious conditions is likely to lead to a spike in deaths in future years. Years 2020 and 2021 highest total deaths in uk for a long while, note the population number increases over time. The actual mortality rates are a lot higher than anything over the last 20 years especially 2020. Yes flu deaths were low the last 2 years due to hygiene measures and extra vaccination but they have been lower occasionally in the past. I agree cancer deaths will increase in the future,but for young people there has been significant drop in deaths lower murders suicide and motor accidents. I think the biggest threat to life expectancy is the long term lung heart and kidney damage done by covid. With regards to the OPs point boris had to gamble open things up for 3 reasons the population was getting fatigued, to keep business and his back benchers happy and most importantly to him to try and keep his job. Over the last 61 years since 1960, 2020 was 22nd in mortality rates so why weren't we locked down down the other 21 higher mortality rated years. Don't need to take my word for it, check the ONS. Death rates fell and life expectancy rose consistently from 1960 until 2012 when death rates crept and continued to rise, probably due to austerity measures. They then shot up in 2020 the figures for 2021 are also high but lower than 2020." So how does that account for the other 20 years | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence Strange isn't it? Overall less people died in the last 2 years than average One large category where there wasn't the normal expected number of deaths was pneumonia and influenza. Those deaths prevented by the use of masks, social distancing and the lockdowns. It is one tiny bit of good news. The death rate of those with missed diagnosis of cancers and delayed treatment of various serious conditions is likely to lead to a spike in deaths in future years. Years 2020 and 2021 highest total deaths in uk for a long while, note the population number increases over time. The actual mortality rates are a lot higher than anything over the last 20 years especially 2020. Yes flu deaths were low the last 2 years due to hygiene measures and extra vaccination but they have been lower occasionally in the past. I agree cancer deaths will increase in the future,but for young people there has been significant drop in deaths lower murders suicide and motor accidents. I think the biggest threat to life expectancy is the long term lung heart and kidney damage done by covid. With regards to the OPs point boris had to gamble open things up for 3 reasons the population was getting fatigued, to keep business and his back benchers happy and most importantly to him to try and keep his job. Over the last 61 years since 1960, 2020 was 22nd in mortality rates so why weren't we locked down down the other 21 higher mortality rated years. Don't need to take my word for it, check the ONS. Death rates fell and life expectancy rose consistently from 1960 until 2012 when death rates crept and continued to rise, probably due to austerity measures. They then shot up in 2020 the figures for 2021 are also high but lower than 2020. So how does that account for the other 20 years " As I said death rates dropped and life expectancy increased over time til austerity came in. I am willing to bet the majority of those 20 years if not all were between 1960 and 1990. Better Medicine, lower pollution, more vaccination, lower smoking rates have made massive differences to life expectancy as time has gone on. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Course, you could have the like of Sir Talk Hindsight " I take it that would be the senior politician who Boris habitually refers to as 'Captain Hindsight' every time he wants a cheap laugh from his chortling supporters in the house? I have zero respect for Johnson's lack of decorum in using childish nicknames in such an environment. How would he like it if Starmer kept calling him 'Bozo the Clown'?* I also have no respect for the Speaker who constantly allows this disrespectful name calling to happen. *If somebody tells me that he does, I would equally expect the Speaker to admonish him. Time for some to bone up on Erskine May's Forms of Address in Parliament. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" We had no pandemics over the previous 60 years. In 2020 less people died due to lockdown so by your own argument lockdown worked Job done" Apart from the Hong Kong flu epidemic in 1968... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" We had no pandemics over the previous 60 years. In 2020 less people died due to lockdown so by your own argument lockdown worked Job done Apart from the Hong Kong flu epidemic in 1968..." And SARS 1 in the early 2000s.... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"When the next variant comes along hope its a killer and most of us get it and die in 24hrs. Also hope boris survives and is taken to jail for mass murder and criminal negligence Strange isn't it? Overall less people died in the last 2 years than average One large category where there wasn't the normal expected number of deaths was pneumonia and influenza. Those deaths prevented by the use of masks, social distancing and the lockdowns. It is one tiny bit of good news. The death rate of those with missed diagnosis of cancers and delayed treatment of various serious conditions is likely to lead to a spike in deaths in future years. Years 2020 and 2021 highest total deaths in uk for a long while, note the population number increases over time. The actual mortality rates are a lot higher than anything over the last 20 years especially 2020. Yes flu deaths were low the last 2 years due to hygiene measures and extra vaccination but they have been lower occasionally in the past. I agree cancer deaths will increase in the future,but for young people there has been significant drop in deaths lower murders suicide and motor accidents. I think the biggest threat to life expectancy is the long term lung heart and kidney damage done by covid. With regards to the OPs point boris had to gamble open things up for 3 reasons the population was getting fatigued, to keep business and his back benchers happy and most importantly to him to try and keep his job. Over the last 61 years since 1960, 2020 was 22nd in mortality rates so why weren't we locked down down the other 21 higher mortality rated years. Don't need to take my word for it, check the ONS. Death rates fell and life expectancy rose consistently from 1960 until 2012 when death rates crept and continued to rise, probably due to austerity measures. They then shot up in 2020 the figures for 2021 are also high but lower than 2020. So how does that account for the other 20 years As I said death rates dropped and life expectancy increased over time til austerity came in. I am willing to bet the majority of those 20 years if not all were between 1960 and 1990. Better Medicine, lower pollution, more vaccination, lower smoking rates have made massive differences to life expectancy as time has gone on." Plus of course, if someone dies and tested positive within 28 days, there's no post mortem anyway so figures are unreliable | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Course, you could have the like of Sir Talk Hindsight I take it that would be the senior politician who Boris habitually refers to as 'Captain Hindsight' every time he wants a cheap laugh from his chortling supporters in the house? I have zero respect for Johnson's lack of decorum in using childish nicknames in such an environment. How would he like it if Starmer kept calling him 'Bozo the Clown'?* I also have no respect for the Speaker who constantly allows this disrespectful name calling to happen. *If somebody tells me that he does, I would equally expect the Speaker to admonish him. Time for some to bone up on Erskine May's Forms of Address in Parliament." I believe he speaks well of you too | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Don't you tory voters feel cheated now? Never understood, and never will why decent hard working class people vote for the self obsessed self interested fuckers." I think the only reason it is cos he is a "funny guy", that is what most think of him. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I believe he speaks well of you too" Nah! He knows very well he can't buy my vote. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Don't you tory voters feel cheated now? Never understood, and never will why decent hard working class people vote for the self obsessed self interested fuckers.I think the only reason it is cos he is a "funny guy", that is what most think of him." Probably true. And it's a shit reason to vote for a person to be PM. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I believe he speaks well of you too Nah! He knows very well he can't buy my vote." Well you can waste your vote on the silly fools | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Don't you tory voters feel cheated now? Never understood, and never will why decent hard working class people vote for the self obsessed self interested fuckers.I think the only reason it is cos he is a "funny guy", that is what most think of him. Probably true. And it's a shit reason to vote for a person to be PM. " You don't vote for a person to be PM. You vote for your local candidate | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" You don't vote for a person to be PM. You vote for your local candidate " Theoretically, but in reality it is usually the leader who people think of at the time. If a leader can be portrayed as a switched off light bulb on election day there is no hope for the party concerned. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" You don't vote for a person to be PM. You vote for your local candidate Theoretically, but in reality it is usually the leader who people think of at the time. If a leader can be portrayed as a switched off light bulb on election day there is no hope for the party concerned." Pretty much. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Meanwhile whilst all the Boris bashing has been ongoing, who paid for his decorating, what parties did he have at his place of work. He has focused on the more important things such as in the last few months helping Ukraine against a dictator by sending out tons and tons of armaments. Sending some of our military out there to assist. There would be a whole list of things that he has done behind the scenes whilst others are focused on parties at his place of work and who funded the decorating of his flat, that belongs to the state! Priceless. " He also focussed on carefully doing v little until certain oligarchs had time to shift their assets. Convenient, that. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" You don't vote for a person to be PM. You vote for your local candidate Theoretically, but in reality it is usually the leader who people think of at the time. If a leader can be portrayed as a switched off light bulb on election day there is no hope for the party concerned." As the labour party is | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name " Cos it makes him all cuddly ad like a chap you could have a beer with down the pub (while behind the scenes his cronies are busy burgling your house) | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name " Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? " His Christian name is Alexander. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander." His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name " As opposed to Mr Hindsight? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. " Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name." The original comment was that it was a self-appointed pseudonym. It is not self-appointed. And it is not a pseudonym. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. The original comment was that it was a self-appointed pseudonym. It is not self-appointed. And it is not a pseudonym. " I know but you said “you mean his Christian name” which is also wrong hence me commenting. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name." This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It is my belief that Boris brushes his hair with a balloon…"  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. The original comment was that it was a self-appointed pseudonym. It is not self-appointed. And it is not a pseudonym. I know but you said “you mean his Christian name” which is also wrong hence me commenting." Ok, it’s one of his forenames. Is that better? Getting back to the original comment, it’s not self appointed, and it’s not a pseudonym. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name " Correct. If he had suddenly decided at university that he wanted to be known as Biffo, that could accurately be described as a self-appointed pseudonym. That’s not what happened. His parents called him boris. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name " I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho!" … and it’s not a made up name, and it’s not self-appointed | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! … and it’s not a made up name, and it’s not self-appointed " Well I didn’t say it was. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! … and it’s not a made up name, and it’s not self-appointed Well I didn’t say it was. " The person I was originally replying to did though. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! … and it’s not a made up name, and it’s not self-appointed " He started using boris at university was known as Alexander before that. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! … and it’s not a made up name, and it’s not self-appointed He started using boris at university was known as Alexander before that." Who gave him the name boris? Himself or his parents? And is it a real name or a made-up pseudonym, as suggested? So is “Boris” a self-appointed pseudonym, as posted earlier? Clearly not. And the name change was when he stared at Eton, when he was 13, not at university … not even close. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name Correct. If he had suddenly decided at university that he wanted to be known as Biffo, that could accurately be described as a self-appointed pseudonym. That’s not what happened. His parents called him boris. " You can't quite get this, can you? Perhaps I need to explain in far simpler terms than I'd have expected. ONE of his fore names (that are correctly identified on his birth certificate as I previously stated) and subsequently christened are his OFFICIAL names. They aren't made up or a pseudonym or picked from a brochure etc so he quite lawfully can choose to be known by ANY of his forenames. Obviously your distain and disrespect has blinded you to FACTS. I have absolutely no doubt you've been called a lot of choice names besides in this thread but he didn't choose the name Boris but preferred that to other of his given and subsequently christened names. Now, if you really do have any problems in understanding that, please forward your opinion in capital letters on a postage stamp. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho!" I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name Correct. If he had suddenly decided at university that he wanted to be known as Biffo, that could accurately be described as a self-appointed pseudonym. That’s not what happened. His parents called him boris. " Sorry, I was actually replying to the person previously. I agree with you | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you " Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t "That's a bit of an insult to cunts. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why anyone would listen to or believe a word that comes out of his lying flip flopping unreliable flakey head il never know" | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This just came to my attention. Seems there were question marks over the 2019 GE result... “It seems that the postal vote was 37%. In previous elections, the postal vote never got out of the teens… The postal vote was, in many areas, ‘managed’ by a private company that donated to the Conservative & Unionist Party. Private company Idox, who till 2018 had a Tory peer on its board, used a wholly owned subsidiary Halarose, to manage Postal votes in 12 Dec 2019 and yet Halarose is already listed on or before 19th December 2019 as being ‘dissolved on 24 Dec 2019’. This seems too convenient.“" Conspiracy nonsense. It happened 3 years ago, move on. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This just came to my attention. Seems there were question marks over the 2019 GE result... “It seems that the postal vote was 37%. In previous elections, the postal vote never got out of the teens… The postal vote was, in many areas, ‘managed’ by a private company that donated to the Conservative & Unionist Party. Private company Idox, who till 2018 had a Tory peer on its board, used a wholly owned subsidiary Halarose, to manage Postal votes in 12 Dec 2019 and yet Halarose is already listed on or before 19th December 2019 as being ‘dissolved on 24 Dec 2019’. This seems too convenient.“ Conspiracy nonsense. It happened 3 years ago, move on." Right you are, of course sir, whatever you say sir...er no I don’t think I will! What elements in that quote did not happen? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This just came to my attention. Seems there were question marks over the 2019 GE result... “It seems that the postal vote was 37%. In previous elections, the postal vote never got out of the teens… The postal vote was, in many areas, ‘managed’ by a private company that donated to the Conservative & Unionist Party. Private company Idox, who till 2018 had a Tory peer on its board, used a wholly owned subsidiary Halarose, to manage Postal votes in 12 Dec 2019 and yet Halarose is already listed on or before 19th December 2019 as being ‘dissolved on 24 Dec 2019’. This seems too convenient.“ Conspiracy nonsense. It happened 3 years ago, move on. Right you are, of course sir, whatever you say sir...er no I don’t think I will! What elements in that quote did not happen?" Can you forward a link from a reputable independent source please? Also, the usage of 'seems' would indicate it isn't proven fact. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This just came to my attention. Seems there were question marks over the 2019 GE result... “It seems that the postal vote was 37%. In previous elections, the postal vote never got out of the teens… The postal vote was, in many areas, ‘managed’ by a private company that donated to the Conservative & Unionist Party. Private company Idox, who till 2018 had a Tory peer on its board, used a wholly owned subsidiary Halarose, to manage Postal votes in 12 Dec 2019 and yet Halarose is already listed on or before 19th December 2019 as being ‘dissolved on 24 Dec 2019’. This seems too convenient.“ Conspiracy nonsense. It happened 3 years ago, move on." Yes, you'd like us to move on wouldn't you. Maybe this will suit, from the psephologist John Curtice: "According to Savanta ComRes, 65 per cent feel that throughout the [partygate] furore the Prime Minister has either “only told lies” or at least that he has “lied more than he has told the truth”. In contrast, just 13 per cent take the view that he has “only told the truth” or “has told the truth more than he has lied”. Even among 2019 Conservative voters, only 23 per cent believe he has largely been truthful." We don't need here to discuss how many torykipper voters there actually were in 2019 - yet. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This just came to my attention. Seems there were question marks over the 2019 GE result... “It seems that the postal vote was 37%. In previous elections, the postal vote never got out of the teens… The postal vote was, in many areas, ‘managed’ by a private company that donated to the Conservative & Unionist Party. Private company Idox, who till 2018 had a Tory peer on its board, used a wholly owned subsidiary Halarose, to manage Postal votes in 12 Dec 2019 and yet Halarose is already listed on or before 19th December 2019 as being ‘dissolved on 24 Dec 2019’. This seems too convenient.“ Conspiracy nonsense. It happened 3 years ago, move on. Yes, you'd like us to move on wouldn't you. Maybe this will suit, from the psephologist John Curtice: "According to Savanta ComRes, 65 per cent feel that throughout the [partygate] furore the Prime Minister has either “only told lies” or at least that he has “lied more than he has told the truth”. In contrast, just 13 per cent take the view that he has “only told the truth” or “has told the truth more than he has lied”. Even among 2019 Conservative voters, only 23 per cent believe he has largely been truthful." We don't need here to discuss how many torykipper voters there actually were in 2019 - yet." To be honest, I'm just bored of the same old conspiracies and nonsense. You haven't asked who I voted for. You also don't know me or my views. We just all need to move on from the past and stop being so bitter. You and I can do nothing. Lets be happy and try and progress. Also, name calling is childish. I asked for facts, not picking a fight. You have quoted a poll based on feelings not fact. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This just came to my attention. Seems there were question marks over the 2019 GE result... “It seems that the postal vote was 37%. In previous elections, the postal vote never got out of the teens… The postal vote was, in many areas, ‘managed’ by a private company that donated to the Conservative & Unionist Party. Private company Idox, who till 2018 had a Tory peer on its board, used a wholly owned subsidiary Halarose, to manage Postal votes in 12 Dec 2019 and yet Halarose is already listed on or before 19th December 2019 as being ‘dissolved on 24 Dec 2019’. This seems too convenient.“ Conspiracy nonsense. It happened 3 years ago, move on. Yes, you'd like us to move on wouldn't you. Maybe this will suit, from the psephologist John Curtice: "According to Savanta ComRes, 65 per cent feel that throughout the [partygate] furore the Prime Minister has either “only told lies” or at least that he has “lied more than he has told the truth”. In contrast, just 13 per cent take the view that he has “only told the truth” or “has told the truth more than he has lied”. Even among 2019 Conservative voters, only 23 per cent believe he has largely been truthful." We don't need here to discuss how many torykipper voters there actually were in 2019 - yet. To be honest, I'm just bored of the same old conspiracies and nonsense. You haven't asked who I voted for. You also don't know me or my views. We just all need to move on from the past and stop being so bitter. You and I can do nothing. Lets be happy and try and progress. Also, name calling is childish. I asked for facts, not picking a fight. You have quoted a poll based on feelings not fact." Maybe best to avoid the Politics forum then because we are all argumentative buggers in here. Not going to do an extensive search but if you are interested there are articles out there. Scottish Herald has a good one. Bylinetimes too but not sure posting links to them allowed as not classed as MSM. “A large software company whose shareholders include Brexiter and former Conservative Cabinet minister Peter Lilley has been given a lucrative contract by the Cabinet Office without competitive tendering to revamp the management of the electoral register in extraordinary circumstances. Though local government is in charge of the electoral register, the Government has responsibility to contract an annual national canvas of people entitled to vote. Idox Software Ltd, part of the worldwide Idox Group, won the £1.7 million contract for its revamp just in advance of purdah imposed by the 2019 General Election – purdah is the period in which politically sensitive announcements or decisions cannot be made in the run-up to an election – and before new regulations had come into force that will allow the company to make major software changes to the compilation of the new electoral register.” Could all be nothing or could be something. As I said, just came to my attention and while irregularities in the USA Presidential Elections appear to be somewhat accepted, it seems surprising the same irregularities (including a massive increase in postal) was not flagged so highly here in the UK? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bizarre that links to (so-called) MSM can be posted in here but not Bylinetimes, which I'd reckon is more trustworthy by far than the torykipper end of the MSM." I've googled it and I still can't find a definition for torykipper? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bizarre that links to (so-called) MSM can be posted in here but not Bylinetimes, which I'd reckon is more trustworthy by far than the torykipper end of the MSM. I've googled it and I still can't find a definition for torykipper?" There are plenty of references out there. Perfect label for a Brexit-obsessed tory party and its voters, I'd have thought. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bizarre that links to (so-called) MSM can be posted in here but not Bylinetimes, which I'd reckon is more trustworthy by far than the torykipper end of the MSM. I've googled it and I still can't find a definition for torykipper? There are plenty of references out there. Perfect label for a Brexit-obsessed tory party and its voters, I'd have thought." Can you define it please? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Maybe best to avoid the Politics forum then because we are all argumentative buggers in here. " Isn't this the virus forum? ..From one argumentative bugger to another! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Meanwhile whilst all the Boris bashing has been ongoing, who paid for his decorating, what parties did he have at his place of work. He has focused on the more important things such as in the last few months helping Ukraine against a dictator by sending out tons and tons of armaments. Sending some of our military out there to assist. There would be a whole list of things that he has done behind the scenes whilst others are focused on parties at his place of work and who funded the decorating of his flat, that belongs to the state! Priceless. He also focussed on carefully doing v little until certain oligarchs had time to shift their assets. Convenient, that." Not to mention the Labour Party having a Chinese Spy in their midst of course! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Maybe best to avoid the Politics forum then because we are all argumentative buggers in here. Isn't this the virus forum? ..From one argumentative bugger to another!" You arguing
It is but I lose track and it was titled Boris | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Maybe best to avoid the Politics forum then because we are all argumentative buggers in here. Isn't this the virus forum? ..From one argumentative bugger to another! You arguing
It is but I lose track and it was titled Boris "Fair enough. Can't get more political than that! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t "That's your opinion and why sit on the fence | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence"Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This just came to my attention. Seems there were question marks over the 2019 GE result... “It seems that the postal vote was 37%. In previous elections, the postal vote never got out of the teens… The postal vote was, in many areas, ‘managed’ by a private company that donated to the Conservative & Unionist Party. Private company Idox, who till 2018 had a Tory peer on its board, used a wholly owned subsidiary Halarose, to manage Postal votes in 12 Dec 2019 and yet Halarose is already listed on or before 19th December 2019 as being ‘dissolved on 24 Dec 2019’. This seems too convenient.“ Conspiracy nonsense. It happened 3 years ago, move on. Right you are, of course sir, whatever you say sir...er no I don’t think I will! What elements in that quote did not happen?" Number of postal votes in 2019 election: 6.7 million. Total valid votes: 31.2 million. Percentage postal votes: 21%. So the 37 % figure is total bollocks. The total percentage of voters who opted for postal voting was 18 per cent. But because the turnout rate was higher, 21 per cent of counted votes were postal. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bizarre that links to (so-called) MSM can be posted in here but not Bylinetimes, which I'd reckon is more trustworthy by far than the torykipper end of the MSM." Byline? Seriously? Might as well quote the daily mash or the beano | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bizarre that links to (so-called) MSM can be posted in here but not Bylinetimes, which I'd reckon is more trustworthy by far than the torykipper end of the MSM. Byline? Seriously? Might as well quote the daily mash or the beano " Why is that? Which news sources do you trust? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t "come to Oldham all the last 14 managers in three years qualify as cnuts !its why we are where we are | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This just came to my attention. Seems there were question marks over the 2019 GE result... “It seems that the postal vote was 37%. In previous elections, the postal vote never got out of the teens… The postal vote was, in many areas, ‘managed’ by a private company that donated to the Conservative & Unionist Party. Private company Idox, who till 2018 had a Tory peer on its board, used a wholly owned subsidiary Halarose, to manage Postal votes in 12 Dec 2019 and yet Halarose is already listed on or before 19th December 2019 as being ‘dissolved on 24 Dec 2019’. This seems too convenient.“ Conspiracy nonsense. It happened 3 years ago, move on. Right you are, of course sir, whatever you say sir...er no I don’t think I will! What elements in that quote did not happen? Number of postal votes in 2019 election: 6.7 million. Total valid votes: 31.2 million. Percentage postal votes: 21%. So the 37 % figure is total bollocks. The total percentage of voters who opted for postal voting was 18 per cent. But because the turnout rate was higher, 21 per cent of counted votes were postal. " Hmmm I thought 37% sounded high but didn’t bother to cross check. What about the company, Tory peer and non-competitive tender let just before purdah kicked in? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! … and it’s not a made up name, and it’s not self-appointed He started using boris at university was known as Alexander before that." After going on a student exchange trip to Russia, of all places. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Bizarre that links to (so-called) MSM can be posted in here but not Bylinetimes, which I'd reckon is more trustworthy by far than the torykipper end of the MSM. Byline? Seriously? Might as well quote the daily mash or the beano Why is that? Which news sources do you trust?" Ones with entire teams of professional journalists, and track record of having reported news accurately. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This just came to my attention. Seems there were question marks over the 2019 GE result... “It seems that the postal vote was 37%. In previous elections, the postal vote never got out of the teens… The postal vote was, in many areas, ‘managed’ by a private company that donated to the Conservative & Unionist Party. Private company Idox, who till 2018 had a Tory peer on its board, used a wholly owned subsidiary Halarose, to manage Postal votes in 12 Dec 2019 and yet Halarose is already listed on or before 19th December 2019 as being ‘dissolved on 24 Dec 2019’. This seems too convenient.“ Conspiracy nonsense. It happened 3 years ago, move on. Right you are, of course sir, whatever you say sir...er no I don’t think I will! What elements in that quote did not happen? Number of postal votes in 2019 election: 6.7 million. Total valid votes: 31.2 million. Percentage postal votes: 21%. So the 37 % figure is total bollocks. The total percentage of voters who opted for postal voting was 18 per cent. But because the turnout rate was higher, 21 per cent of counted votes were postal. Hmmm I thought 37% sounded high but didn’t bother to cross check. What about the company, Tory peer and non-competitive tender let just before purdah kicked in?" I’m not going to fact-check the entire story for you. The 37 per cent lie was enough of a red flag. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t "Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary? Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others. Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here. I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris "Fair comments. I’m not a fan of the bloke, but can’t stand the absolute hatred posted by some people. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The latest opinion poll (March 25) puts Conservatives on 34.9 % and Labour on 39.4 %. Liberals 9.4 %" The same pollsters showed an 11 point advantage to labour at the end of January. Most pollsters show the same sort of trend, that labour have a narrower advantage than a few months ago. Another survey dated 27 March shows a 2 point gap, and Kantar showed them level in their most recent figures | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Fair comments. I’m not a fan of the bloke, but can’t stand the absolute hatred posted by some people. " Fair comment. The same applied, no doubt, to the hatred thrown at Jeremy Corbyn? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
"Boris does as he is told " We must be thinking of different blokes. The one I’m thinking of does whatever the hell he feels like doing, rather than doing “as he is told”. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Fair comments. I’m not a fan of the bloke, but can’t stand the absolute hatred posted by some people. Fair comment. The same applied, no doubt, to the hatred thrown at Jeremy Corbyn?" Of course. Robust dialogue is fine. Disagreeing completely with someone’s policies or political beliefs is fine. Posting vile hatred isn’t. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris "Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO. You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues? I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Fair comments. I’m not a fan of the bloke, but can’t stand the absolute hatred posted by some people. Fair comment. The same applied, no doubt, to the hatred thrown at Jeremy Corbyn? Of course. Robust dialogue is fine. Disagreeing completely with someone’s policies or political beliefs is fine. Posting vile hatred isn’t. " Absolutely | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!"How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him. I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!"The poster didn’t say they were a bojo fan, just said tone down the language, as vile abuse gets us nowhere. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
The poster didn’t say they were a bojo fan, just said tone down the language, as vile abuse gets us nowhere. "Absolutely | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner "I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is. With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good). I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles. As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless. So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy."And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever. "The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre! As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there! "Oh and Tories winning / next PM - of course that will be significantly helped by changes to ward boundaries and requirement for photo ID both of which substantially favour the Tories - go figure (start waving bye bye to a proper democracy). | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there! "Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Oh and Tories winning / next PM - of course that will be significantly helped by changes to ward boundaries and requirement for photo ID both of which substantially favour the Tories - go figure (start waving bye bye to a proper democracy)."Perhaps join the new alliance with China and Russia to establish a new democratic world order. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Oh and Tories winning / next PM - of course that will be significantly helped by changes to ward boundaries and requirement for photo ID both of which substantially favour the Tories - go figure (start waving bye bye to a proper democracy)."Fairer boundaries and more rigorous checks on ID are a bad thing for democracy? I see! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity "If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think). Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different. Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son! Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Oh and Tories winning / next PM - of course that will be significantly helped by changes to ward boundaries and requirement for photo ID both of which substantially favour the Tories - go figure (start waving bye bye to a proper democracy).
Fairer boundaries and more rigorous checks on ID are a bad thing for democracy? I see! "Look it up. Voter fraud requiring photo ID is a non issue. The electoral commission have written loads about it. There is literally no requirement. But poor people are far less likely to drive or have a passport and therefore have photo ID. Guess which way a lot of poorer people vote? The boundary thing is totally skewing towards the Tories. This is not just me saying it! Everyone agrees. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people."I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3? The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination). | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination)."Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen). Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time. I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so). Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella "Not sure anyone is “defending” him. Just saying how highly offensive and obnoxious your content and tone are. I realise of course that you will just double down again, and reiterate your hatred of the man. Broken record … | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella
Not sure anyone is “defending” him. Just saying how highly offensive and obnoxious your content and tone are.
I realise of course that you will just double down again, and reiterate your hatred of the man. Broken record … "Hmmm I use one piece of Anglo-Saxon vernacular and it has resulted in two people trying to take some kind of moral high ground. To Pocket Rocket I already said that if she finds that word offensive then I apologise for that offence. So erm what else is there? There is a delicious irony is that you are both more offended by a single word than the actual actions of Johnson. I think your offence is totally misplaced. Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells should perhaps pay more attention to the detail of what is being discussed and less attention to the way it is said. It is a classic diversionary tactic to redirect people ire! As for everything else I have said...please enlighten me where what I have said is untrue or wrong because I do indeed stand by it. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella
Not sure anyone is “defending” him. Just saying how highly offensive and obnoxious your content and tone are.
I realise of course that you will just double down again, and reiterate your hatred of the man. Broken record …
Hmmm I use one piece of Anglo-Saxon vernacular and it has resulted in two people trying to take some kind of moral high ground.
To Pocket Rocket I already said that if she finds that word offensive then I apologise for that offence. So erm what else is there?
There is a delicious irony is that you are both more offended by a single word than the actual actions of Johnson. I think your offence is totally misplaced. Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells should perhaps pay more attention to the detail of what is being discussed and less attention to the way it is said. It is a classic diversionary tactic to redirect people ire!
As for everything else I have said...please enlighten me where what I have said is untrue or wrong because I do indeed stand by it. "No point trying to have a reasonable exchange of views with someone who is so entrenched in their hatred. You clearly hate the man, and have made that clear. That’s fine with me. I’m not a fan myself, but have a more balanced view of his record | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella
Not sure anyone is “defending” him. Just saying how highly offensive and obnoxious your content and tone are.
I realise of course that you will just double down again, and reiterate your hatred of the man. Broken record …
Hmmm I use one piece of Anglo-Saxon vernacular and it has resulted in two people trying to take some kind of moral high ground.
To Pocket Rocket I already said that if she finds that word offensive then I apologise for that offence. So erm what else is there?
There is a delicious irony is that you are both more offended by a single word than the actual actions of Johnson. I think your offence is totally misplaced. Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells should perhaps pay more attention to the detail of what is being discussed and less attention to the way it is said. It is a classic diversionary tactic to redirect people ire!
As for everything else I have said...please enlighten me where what I have said is untrue or wrong because I do indeed stand by it.
No point trying to have a reasonable exchange of views with someone who is so entrenched in their hatred. You clearly hate the man, and have made that clear. That’s fine with me. I’m not a fan myself, but have a more balanced view of his record "At what point (apart from a swear word) have my posts made it remotely difficult to have a “reasonable exchange”. You do know that making robust arguments is an essential tool in politics right? Come on Jimmy I welcome hearing your “more balanced view on his record”. You never know, I might even agree with one or two points? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella
Not sure anyone is “defending” him. Just saying how highly offensive and obnoxious your content and tone are.
I realise of course that you will just double down again, and reiterate your hatred of the man. Broken record …
Hmmm I use one piece of Anglo-Saxon vernacular and it has resulted in two people trying to take some kind of moral high ground.
To Pocket Rocket I already said that if she finds that word offensive then I apologise for that offence. So erm what else is there?
There is a delicious irony is that you are both more offended by a single word than the actual actions of Johnson. I think your offence is totally misplaced. Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells should perhaps pay more attention to the detail of what is being discussed and less attention to the way it is said. It is a classic diversionary tactic to redirect people ire!
As for everything else I have said...please enlighten me where what I have said is untrue or wrong because I do indeed stand by it.
No point trying to have a reasonable exchange of views with someone who is so entrenched in their hatred. You clearly hate the man, and have made that clear. That’s fine with me. I’m not a fan myself, but have a more balanced view of his record
At what point (apart from a swear word) have my posts made it remotely difficult to have a “reasonable exchange”. You do know that making robust arguments is an essential tool in politics right? Come on Jimmy I welcome hearing your “more balanced view on his record”. You never know, I might even agree with one or two points?"Seems unlikely, given how entrenched your hatred is. Would be a waste of time. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella
Not sure anyone is “defending” him. Just saying how highly offensive and obnoxious your content and tone are.
I realise of course that you will just double down again, and reiterate your hatred of the man. Broken record …
Hmmm I use one piece of Anglo-Saxon vernacular and it has resulted in two people trying to take some kind of moral high ground.
To Pocket Rocket I already said that if she finds that word offensive then I apologise for that offence. So erm what else is there?
There is a delicious irony is that you are both more offended by a single word than the actual actions of Johnson. I think your offence is totally misplaced. Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells should perhaps pay more attention to the detail of what is being discussed and less attention to the way it is said. It is a classic diversionary tactic to redirect people ire!
As for everything else I have said...please enlighten me where what I have said is untrue or wrong because I do indeed stand by it.
No point trying to have a reasonable exchange of views with someone who is so entrenched in their hatred. You clearly hate the man, and have made that clear. That’s fine with me. I’m not a fan myself, but have a more balanced view of his record
At what point (apart from a swear word) have my posts made it remotely difficult to have a “reasonable exchange”. You do know that making robust arguments is an essential tool in politics right? Come on Jimmy I welcome hearing your “more balanced view on his record”. You never know, I might even agree with one or two points?
Seems unlikely, given how entrenched your hatred is. Would be a waste of time.
"So you cannot put up a cogent counter argument that supports your “more balanced view on his record”. So basically all you have got is that I used a rude word to describe Johnson. Is that it? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella "I'm not defending him as such but you're so profoundly nasty so I suppose anyone could. Even your 'mates' wouldn't be as vitriolic as you. Obviously you need to be taught about the Queen. He, like other Prime Ministers and presidents and despots oversaw a lot of people suffering and dying WITH covid diagnosed in the previous 28 days but actually no figures produced how many died because of covid. Plus not one person died of flu or respiratory diseases in 2020/21 which normally accounts for 30/50,000 and the average age of people dying actually increased in 2021. But hey ho, you just keep slagging off the Prime Minister and vote for the New World Order from the Kremlin | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella
I'm not defending him as such but you're so profoundly nasty so I suppose anyone could. Even your 'mates' wouldn't be as vitriolic as you.
Obviously you need to be taught about the Queen.
He, like other Prime Ministers and presidents and despots oversaw a lot of people suffering and dying WITH covid diagnosed in the previous 28 days but actually no figures produced how many died because of covid. Plus not one person died of flu or respiratory diseases in 2020/21 which normally accounts for 30/50,000 and the average age of people dying actually increased in 2021. But hey ho, you just keep slagging off the Prime Minister and vote for the New World Order from the Kremlin "WTAF so you are a Covid denier! And you ARE defending Johnson! You really need to understand the ACTUAL facts around “died with” vs “died of” because the former includes people who would quite happily have lived on for years had their pre-existing condition not been aggravated or accelerated by Covid. Your average Flu figure is completely wrong. In an average year approx 10k people die of Flu. A few years back (2017 or 18 I think) there was a bad outbreak and approx 50k died. Your point on the New World Order is so messed up I do not know where to begin. You do realise the folks who believe that stuff also believe the likes of Johnson and the UK Govt are part of the Conspiracy right? That the Covid vaccines were a key step in achieving the NWO? It has nothing to do with Kremlin! I think you are conflating or getting your conspiracies mixed up 
So I am vitriolic because I am challenging the integrity of Johnson oh yes I used a bad word twice (once in two posts) oh deary me!
And what pray tell do I need to be taught about the Queen. I’m sorry but this is getting laughable now. I strongly suspect I am better informed than you on that topic and indeed most of what happens inside Govt. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella
Not sure anyone is “defending” him. Just saying how highly offensive and obnoxious your content and tone are.
I realise of course that you will just double down again, and reiterate your hatred of the man. Broken record …
Hmmm I use one piece of Anglo-Saxon vernacular and it has resulted in two people trying to take some kind of moral high ground.
To Pocket Rocket I already said that if she finds that word offensive then I apologise for that offence. So erm what else is there?
There is a delicious irony is that you are both more offended by a single word than the actual actions of Johnson. I think your offence is totally misplaced. Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells should perhaps pay more attention to the detail of what is being discussed and less attention to the way it is said. It is a classic diversionary tactic to redirect people ire!
As for everything else I have said...please enlighten me where what I have said is untrue or wrong because I do indeed stand by it.
No point trying to have a reasonable exchange of views with someone who is so entrenched in their hatred. You clearly hate the man, and have made that clear. That’s fine with me. I’m not a fan myself, but have a more balanced view of his record
At what point (apart from a swear word) have my posts made it remotely difficult to have a “reasonable exchange”. You do know that making robust arguments is an essential tool in politics right? Come on Jimmy I welcome hearing your “more balanced view on his record”. You never know, I might even agree with one or two points?
Seems unlikely, given how entrenched your hatred is. Would be a waste of time.
So you cannot put up a cogent counter argument that supports your “more balanced view on his record”. So basically all you have got is that I used a rude word to describe Johnson. Is that it? "No, that’s not “it”. As I already posted, I am not a fan of boris. And the last thing I am going to do is waste my time flagging some of the good things he has done just so that you can take pot-shots at them. Like I say, I have a balanced view. I don’t agree with everything he does, don’t like some of the things he does, but am perfectly happy with most of his output. I am not the Boris supporter that you seek so desperate to have a fight with. And no, it’s not just that you used one bad word, it’s that you are massively entrenched in a 100 per cent negative view of him, expressed with hatred and vitriol so there is zero point in engaging. You hate him, I have a more neutral view. Simple | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella
Not sure anyone is “defending” him. Just saying how highly offensive and obnoxious your content and tone are.
I realise of course that you will just double down again, and reiterate your hatred of the man. Broken record …
Hmmm I use one piece of Anglo-Saxon vernacular and it has resulted in two people trying to take some kind of moral high ground.
To Pocket Rocket I already said that if she finds that word offensive then I apologise for that offence. So erm what else is there?
There is a delicious irony is that you are both more offended by a single word than the actual actions of Johnson. I think your offence is totally misplaced. Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells should perhaps pay more attention to the detail of what is being discussed and less attention to the way it is said. It is a classic diversionary tactic to redirect people ire!
As for everything else I have said...please enlighten me where what I have said is untrue or wrong because I do indeed stand by it.
No point trying to have a reasonable exchange of views with someone who is so entrenched in their hatred. You clearly hate the man, and have made that clear. That’s fine with me. I’m not a fan myself, but have a more balanced view of his record
At what point (apart from a swear word) have my posts made it remotely difficult to have a “reasonable exchange”. You do know that making robust arguments is an essential tool in politics right? Come on Jimmy I welcome hearing your “more balanced view on his record”. You never know, I might even agree with one or two points?
Seems unlikely, given how entrenched your hatred is. Would be a waste of time.
So you cannot put up a cogent counter argument that supports your “more balanced view on his record”. So basically all you have got is that I used a rude word to describe Johnson. Is that it?
No, that’s not “it”.
As I already posted, I am not a fan of boris. And the last thing I am going to do is waste my time flagging some of the good things he has done just so that you can take pot-shots at them.
Like I say, I have a balanced view. I don’t agree with everything he does, don’t like some of the things he does, but am perfectly happy with most of his output.
I am not the Boris supporter that you seek so desperate to have a fight with.
And no, it’s not just that you used one bad word, it’s that you are massively entrenched in a 100 per cent negative view of him, expressed with hatred and vitriol so there is zero point in engaging.
You hate him, I have a more neutral view. Simple "“but am perfectly happy with most of his output” says it all really. Really makes one wonder what he has to do to finally annoy some people? It really is quite bizarre. Enjoy your tax rises. Enjoy ignoring scandal after scandal. I have to wonder what all these other positive things he has done for you to like “most” but I genuinely doubt you could list many. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just leave this here for Boris Johnson fans... “Use of Lebedev family residences by Boris Johnson “much greater than previously known”. Total time spent by the prime minister & former foreign secretary at these homes now thought to run “into months” not days. All time spent there without security detail or sweeps. The use of Lebedev’s multiple homes in Italy and UK supplied by the Putin-near former KGB officer Alexander Lebedev is now known to have been - contrary to earlier reports - regular events with Johnson taking the time to visit Italy alone on at least 5-10 occasions. While on some occasions parties were involved this was not the case every time. In some cases a much smaller more group attended. Johnson was transported on several occasions via Alexander Lebedev’s private jet. The same jet the Lebedev family use for their business in Russia. While some details of these visits have leaked out such as the infamous 2018 Perugia visit, what is oft missed is that Boris Johnson would have been carrying information not only on the Salisbury chemical attacks but also - we now know - confidential details on NATO enlargement.“ It just goes on and on! " Good job labour don’t have any dirty Russian links … | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella
Not sure anyone is “defending” him. Just saying how highly offensive and obnoxious your content and tone are.
I realise of course that you will just double down again, and reiterate your hatred of the man. Broken record …
Hmmm I use one piece of Anglo-Saxon vernacular and it has resulted in two people trying to take some kind of moral high ground.
To Pocket Rocket I already said that if she finds that word offensive then I apologise for that offence. So erm what else is there?
There is a delicious irony is that you are both more offended by a single word than the actual actions of Johnson. I think your offence is totally misplaced. Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells should perhaps pay more attention to the detail of what is being discussed and less attention to the way it is said. It is a classic diversionary tactic to redirect people ire!
As for everything else I have said...please enlighten me where what I have said is untrue or wrong because I do indeed stand by it.
No point trying to have a reasonable exchange of views with someone who is so entrenched in their hatred. You clearly hate the man, and have made that clear. That’s fine with me. I’m not a fan myself, but have a more balanced view of his record
At what point (apart from a swear word) have my posts made it remotely difficult to have a “reasonable exchange”. You do know that making robust arguments is an essential tool in politics right? Come on Jimmy I welcome hearing your “more balanced view on his record”. You never know, I might even agree with one or two points?
Seems unlikely, given how entrenched your hatred is. Would be a waste of time.
So you cannot put up a cogent counter argument that supports your “more balanced view on his record”. So basically all you have got is that I used a rude word to describe Johnson. Is that it?
No, that’s not “it”.
As I already posted, I am not a fan of boris. And the last thing I am going to do is waste my time flagging some of the good things he has done just so that you can take pot-shots at them.
Like I say, I have a balanced view. I don’t agree with everything he does, don’t like some of the things he does, but am perfectly happy with most of his output.
I am not the Boris supporter that you seek so desperate to have a fight with.
And no, it’s not just that you used one bad word, it’s that you are massively entrenched in a 100 per cent negative view of him, expressed with hatred and vitriol so there is zero point in engaging.
You hate him, I have a more neutral view. Simple
“but am perfectly happy with most of his output” says it all really. Really makes one wonder what he has to do to finally annoy some people? It really is quite bizarre.
Enjoy your tax rises. Enjoy ignoring scandal after scandal. I have to wonder what all these other positive things he has done for you to like “most” but I genuinely doubt you could list many."This thread contains some of the longest chunks of re-quoting I have ever seen on Fab. Think we should blame Boris for that! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Just leave this here for Boris Johnson fans... “Use of Lebedev family residences by Boris Johnson “much greater than previously known”. Total time spent by the prime minister & former foreign secretary at these homes now thought to run “into months” not days. All time spent there without security detail or sweeps. The use of Lebedev’s multiple homes in Italy and UK supplied by the Putin-near former KGB officer Alexander Lebedev is now known to have been - contrary to earlier reports - regular events with Johnson taking the time to visit Italy alone on at least 5-10 occasions. While on some occasions parties were involved this was not the case every time. In some cases a much smaller more group attended. Johnson was transported on several occasions via Alexander Lebedev’s private jet. The same jet the Lebedev family use for their business in Russia. While some details of these visits have leaked out such as the infamous 2018 Perugia visit, what is oft missed is that Boris Johnson would have been carrying information not only on the Salisbury chemical attacks but also - we now know - confidential details on NATO enlargement.“ It just goes on and on! Good job labour don’t have any dirty Russian links … " And just like clockwork...whataboutism When you cannot actually defend the indefensible you resort to trying to justify actions by saying other people are bad too! As if that excuses or makes it alright. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella
Not sure anyone is “defending” him. Just saying how highly offensive and obnoxious your content and tone are.
I realise of course that you will just double down again, and reiterate your hatred of the man. Broken record …
Hmmm I use one piece of Anglo-Saxon vernacular and it has resulted in two people trying to take some kind of moral high ground.
To Pocket Rocket I already said that if she finds that word offensive then I apologise for that offence. So erm what else is there?
There is a delicious irony is that you are both more offended by a single word than the actual actions of Johnson. I think your offence is totally misplaced. Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells should perhaps pay more attention to the detail of what is being discussed and less attention to the way it is said. It is a classic diversionary tactic to redirect people ire!
As for everything else I have said...please enlighten me where what I have said is untrue or wrong because I do indeed stand by it.
No point trying to have a reasonable exchange of views with someone who is so entrenched in their hatred. You clearly hate the man, and have made that clear. That’s fine with me. I’m not a fan myself, but have a more balanced view of his record
At what point (apart from a swear word) have my posts made it remotely difficult to have a “reasonable exchange”. You do know that making robust arguments is an essential tool in politics right? Come on Jimmy I welcome hearing your “more balanced view on his record”. You never know, I might even agree with one or two points?
Seems unlikely, given how entrenched your hatred is. Would be a waste of time.
So you cannot put up a cogent counter argument that supports your “more balanced view on his record”. So basically all you have got is that I used a rude word to describe Johnson. Is that it?
No, that’s not “it”.
As I already posted, I am not a fan of boris. And the last thing I am going to do is waste my time flagging some of the good things he has done just so that you can take pot-shots at them.
Like I say, I have a balanced view. I don’t agree with everything he does, don’t like some of the things he does, but am perfectly happy with most of his output.
I am not the Boris supporter that you seek so desperate to have a fight with.
And no, it’s not just that you used one bad word, it’s that you are massively entrenched in a 100 per cent negative view of him, expressed with hatred and vitriol so there is zero point in engaging.
You hate him, I have a more neutral view. Simple
“but am perfectly happy with most of his output” says it all really. Really makes one wonder what he has to do to finally annoy some people? It really is quite bizarre.
Enjoy your tax rises. Enjoy ignoring scandal after scandal. I have to wonder what all these other positive things he has done for you to like “most” but I genuinely doubt you could list many.
This thread contains some of the longest chunks of re-quoting I have ever seen on Fab.
Think we should blame Boris for that!"Don’t you start
Oh damn another long quote!!! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people insist on using his self appointed pseudonym i stead of Johnson? Bodger is a more appropriate name Self appointed pseudonym? You mean his Christian name? His Christian name is Alexander. His parents named him Alexander Boris, and call him boris. That’s fairly common practice, hence the “known as” box on many forms we fill out. Clearly not “self appointed” (name was given to him by his parents, not himself), and clearly not a pseudonym. Not his Christian name though. That is what appears on his birth certificate and would require a deed poll to change legally. He can be “known as” pretty much anything but it still isn’t his legal name. This is his name 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson'. He can use any of his Christian names. You don't have to use the first name I didn’t realise that middle names were classed as Christian names but yes you are quite right as are you Jimmy and I got it wrong. So Boris it is then. Shame his middle name isn’t cu7t but hey ho! I take it that you're not a fan of the Prime Minister. However, I'm sure he speaks highly of you Couldn’t care less and nor could he for any of you. The only person Johnson cares for is himself. This man has zero morals. He was having an affair with Carrie while his wife was battling cancer. But hey, you support him. I think he is a cu7t
That's your opinion and why sit on the fence
Of course and you are perfectly entitled to your opinion too (I was being a bit ranty). I am just angry that Johnson still has any supporters after all he has done or allowed to be done. I just do not get it. It is like a huge chunk of the British public are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
It is possible to support your football team and still admit the manager is a cu7t
Do you honestly think that by calling Boris names which are extremely disrespectful will make any difference to anyone? You do realise that by using such profanity only shows your lack of vocabulary?
Remember, those in glass houses etc and there's hardly any people on here that have such an pure white background that they can call others.
Have you considered writing to the Prime Minister and telling him your opinion or are you just a keyboard warrior particularly on here.
I've got to be honest, I think if there was a general election tomorrow, he'd be returned to Downing Street especially looking at get opposition. Just calm your rants as it says more about you than your sheer hatred for Boris
Oh dear you seem upset. Always considered my vocabulary to be pretty decent thanks. Some things in life can only really be expressed succinctly and satisfactorily by resorting to some good old Anglo-Saxon profanity. These words just sum him up so well IMO.
You clearly believe Johnson to be a good bloke? Thoroughly decent chap? Someone who has really benefited the country and indeed yourself? Someone whose actions have not directly negatively impacted on family and close colleagues?
I would be very interested in hearing why you think that? You never know, you might even convince me I am wrong!
How can I possibly even start to try to convince you as you have such a vile hatred of him.
I didn't say what you are alluding to but he is currently our Prime Minister and there's not one person in any other party that is anywhere near effective. Oh, sorry I forgot, you're clearly a follower of Dianne Abbott and Angela Rayner
I wondered how long it would be until we got some whataboutism. You are clearly assuming I am a far left Labour supporter. You’d be wrong. I agree that Diane Abbot is useless. Jury is out (for me currently) on Angela Rayner. I don’t really like her but no idea how capable she is.
With regards to the Tories, well I am sorry but I would say the vast majority are more capable than Johnson. The only ones as useless as him are the gonks he has surrounded himself with (to at least try to make himself look good).
I would be willing to get a large sum of money that not a single one of them would have found their way into the Cabinet under wither Thatcher or Major. They are an utter shambles.
As for your implied requirement that I should be more respectful to Johnson. No! People earn respect and I have not see any evidence throughout his political career that he deserves any respect whatsoever. It has been a catalogue of inappropriate use of public money, and enrichment of himself and his cronies He has presided over the greatest transfer of public assets - YOUR MONEY - in British history all the while lying to Parliament, the public and the Queen! He literally said “fuck business” when concerns were raised about impact of Brexit. He is a vile racist. He is entitled. He signed off on thousands of elderly people being sent from hospitals into care homes without Covid tests leading to countless deaths. He is a confirmed security risk who the intelligence services believe could be compromised (and if so that also means he is a traitor). He has no integrity and is a political opportunist who has jumped from one bandwagon to another purely to further his own career. The list is endless.
So no I will not treat him with any respect beyond what he deserves, which is none. If you find my view points vile then by all means ignore them. It really is quite easy.
And he'll be Prime Minister next time too. As I said previously, profanity does not help your argument ever.
The sad thing is you are probably right because of a combination of devout tribalism and a significant chunk of the electorate suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Really is quite bizarre!
As for the use of profanity, I will ignore the irony of that bring said on a swinger website, while I totally stand by what I said and called him (if the cap fits and all that) if that word offended YOU (and only you) then I apologise for that offence. Not for using it but for the fact that you find the word offensive. However, I trust you won’t be venturing into some of the other forums though right? Some choice language in there!
Ah so being on a swingers site gives you carte blanche to use any gutter language you feel appropriate so how come when I ONCE used a derogatory word F*** o** to a rather obnoxious abusive misogynistic bigot, I got my account suspended yet you feel you've every right to call the duly and correctly elected Prime Minister, it's ok. Yeah, I'll pass on that. You're right. Keep your vulgarity
If you told another member of Fab to F off then you broke the rules because that is abuse. There are, as far as I am aware, no rules on language beyond certain words being banned (mostly racist I think).
Giving opinions on the character of our politicians is completely different.
Again you mention duly and correctly elected as if that entitles someone to respect based purely on their position rather than their actions. I respect the Queen because of her actions and service not because she is the Monarch. I have zero respect for Andrew her son!
Johnson is not deserving of my respect for the reasons already set out and a far longer list I won’t bother typing. He is insidious and has helped to further ruin this country and the lives of the majority of the people.
I'm sure he won't lose any sleep because an insidious and abusive person seems to know how to run the country better than he does. I appreciate you respect the Queen but she is the titular head of the country and has no powers except any bestowed on her by the Government. You may not like Boris and you're mistaken if you think I'm a fan, however, what other Prime Minister has had this to deal with? Brexit, Pandemic and potentially ww3?
The UK (basically the government) has one of the most successful vaccine programmes in the world (without compulsory vaccination).
Oh dear (thanks for trying to school me on the role of the Queen).
Poor wittle Bowis has had so so hard. The cuddly wuddly wittle fella has had such a tough time.
I mean it is really hard to be complicit in the corporate manslaughter of 000s of elderly people. Must be so difficult to put a stop to rampant corruption and theft. Must be impossible to turn down the invites the “parties” in the Tuscan villa of a Russian billionaire with known KGB connections (and give that pesky security detail the slip to do so).
Nobody made him aim for the top job (although maybe his handlers did). He had a chance through a national crisis to show his mettle and worth. To remove the odious stench that clings to him. But no. Instead he chose to make rules that didn’t apply to himself and literally gurn and laugh his way through the misery of others. The man is an utter weasel. A corrupt, thieving, uncaring, entitled, useless weasel. But yeah you just keep on defending the little fella
I'm not defending him as such but you're so profoundly nasty so I suppose anyone could. Even your 'mates' wouldn't be as vitriolic as you.
Obviously you need to be taught about the Queen.
He, like other Prime Ministers and presidents and despots oversaw a lot of people suffering and dying WITH covid diagnosed in the previous 28 days but actually no figures produced how many died because of covid. Plus not one person died of flu or respiratory diseases in 2020/21 which normally accounts for 30/50,000 and the average age of people dying actually increased in 2021. But hey ho, you just keep slagging off the Prime Minister and vote for the New World Order from the Kremlin
WTAF so you are a Covid denier! And you ARE defending Johnson!
You really need to understand the ACTUAL facts around “died with” vs “died of” because the former includes people who would quite happily have lived on for years had their pre-existing condition not been aggravated or accelerated by Covid.
Your average Flu figure is completely wrong. In an average year approx 10k people die of Flu. A few years back (2017 or 18 I think) there was a bad outbreak and approx 50k died.
Your point on the New World Order is so messed up I do not know where to begin. You do realise the folks who believe that stuff also believe the likes of Johnson and the UK Govt are part of the Conspiracy right? That the Covid vaccines were a key step in achieving the NWO? It has nothing to do with Kremlin! I think you are conflating or getting your conspiracies mixed up
So I am vitriolic because I am challenging the integrity of Johnson oh yes I used a bad word twice (once in two posts) oh deary me!
And what pray tell do I need to be taught about the Queen. I’m sorry but this is getting laughable now. I strongly suspect I am better informed than you on that topic and indeed most of what happens inside Govt."Unfortunately you're beyond help if you think you need help. If you read the latest meeting between Russia and China you'll see that they think they can set up a new democratic world order, as if but yeah I think you can be in line to head that. I don't care how many times you used profanity, you say twice, well I day that is twice too much. You're not in the gutter (apparently) so why use that sort of language? What's your reason? Ah so if you're better informed what happens in the government, then why are you spouting your vitriolic abuse on a swingers site? So from you inner secret sources in deepest darkest Westminster, where did 2020 come on the the list out of the last 60 years. Meaning from 1961, in the last 60 years, where did the 2020 come in the death rate? ONS might help but I'm sure you'll know the head of it. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
