Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Virus |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Further, admittedly anecdotal evidence to add. My brother tested positive today, 4 days after his wife first tested positive. He had 3 vaccines. The "positive" test line is extremely faint but definitely there. Compared to the unvaccinated positive test that our son produced back in early July, my brother's did require careful examination to confirm that the line was there. One of his daughters (7) also produced a positive test today with a stronger positive line, she is obviously unvaccinated. A second daughter (nearly 9) remains negative on LFT. It's an interesting epidemiological study in the family " Feint lines right at the start and right at the end when antibodies are lowest. Or could be a sign of just very low antibodies / mild infection, I’m just guessing ! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Further, admittedly anecdotal evidence to add. My brother tested positive today, 4 days after his wife first tested positive. He had 3 vaccines. The "positive" test line is extremely faint but definitely there. Compared to the unvaccinated positive test that our son produced back in early July, my brother's did require careful examination to confirm that the line was there. One of his daughters (7) also produced a positive test today with a stronger positive line, she is obviously unvaccinated. A second daughter (nearly 9) remains negative on LFT. It's an interesting epidemiological study in the family Feint lines right at the start and right at the end when antibodies are lowest. Or could be a sign of just very low antibodies / mild infection, I’m just guessing ! " The antigen tests (LFTs) detect the S protein antigen. The tests work like a pregnancy test basically, same idea. The test paper for COVID LFTs is impregnated (pun not intended) with antibodies against the S protein. If a sample containing the S protein (so COVID positive) passes over the impregnated area, the S protein binds to the antibodies, they aggregate and a change in colour is detected at this point. Pregnancy tests work exactly the same way, except that the antibodies impregnated on the test strip are against human chorionic gonadotropin hormone, which is high in pregnant women. For the COVID test strip to show a feint line, there must be a comparatively small amount of S protein in the sample, which would correlate with reduced viral load. However, there's always the possibility that LFTs designed with the "original" S protein antibodies are less effective at binding to Omicron S protein due to the mutations and that the feint line is just a feature of Omicron. It does concern me that people may have feint or apparently negative tests and still have Omicron. My PT is a prime example. His girlfriend got a positive LFT on Christmas Eve. He had some possible symptoms yesterday, but produced several negative LFTs. He's isolating anyway out of a sense of obligation. Ditto a work colleague who had symptoms, tested negative for three days on LFT but positive on PCR and definitely had COVID. He eventually got a positive out of an LFT on about day 5 of symptoms. I'm not convinced by LFTs in their current design for Omicron. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The antigen tests (LFTs) detect the S protein antigen. The tests work like a pregnancy test basically, same idea. The test paper for COVID LFTs is impregnated (pun not intended) with antibodies against the S protein. If a sample containing the S protein (so COVID positive) passes over the impregnated area, the S protein binds to the antibodies, they aggregate and a change in colour is detected at this point. Pregnancy tests work exactly the same way, except that the antibodies impregnated on the test strip are against human chorionic gonadotropin hormone, which is high in pregnant women. For the COVID test strip to show a feint line, there must be a comparatively small amount of S protein in the sample, which would correlate with reduced viral load. However, there's always the possibility that LFTs designed with the "original" S protein antibodies are less effective at binding to Omicron S protein due to the mutations and that the feint line is just a feature of Omicron. It does concern me that people may have feint or apparently negative tests and still have Omicron. My PT is a prime example. His girlfriend got a positive LFT on Christmas Eve. He had some possible symptoms yesterday, but produced several negative LFTs. He's isolating anyway out of a sense of obligation. Ditto a work colleague who had symptoms, tested negative for three days on LFT but positive on PCR and definitely had COVID. He eventually got a positive out of an LFT on about day 5 of symptoms. I'm not convinced by LFTs in their current design for Omicron. " Lateral flows are anti-nucleocapsid so aren't influenced by S variants. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"PS: I am not referring to feint lines that appeared outside the testing period. These appeared within moments of the test being carried out, so are valid results. " Yes that seems very common , I’m my experience, people I know and myself it was at the start and end of infection | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m pissed off cos we can’t get lateral flow tests anywhere" I couldn't get any for a while and could get any online. I managed to order some the other day though they haven't arrived yet. Check online several times A-day because they do become available you've just got to be quick | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Will keep trying Just think they handy to have My son has just for covid and we can’t test as don’t have any" Might be worth booking in for a PCR just to be sure. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m pissed off cos we can’t get lateral flow tests anywhere" Have you tried ordering for delivery via mail? I though that S Gene missing in a PCR test was an indication of Omicron variant? Omicron still shows on a LFT. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m pissed off cos we can’t get lateral flow tests anywhere Have you tried ordering for delivery via mail? I though that S Gene missing in a PCR test was an indication of Omicron variant? Omicron still shows on a LFT." Someone above has corrected me. The LFTs use the anti-nucelocapsid antibody. Not the S protein. So mutations in S shouldn't have any impact. It would appear to be a viral load issue with feint vs bold results on the strip. Makes sense. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sure does.. Would be curious to see if a lighter marker ended up a milder or asymptomatic outcome, and a darker became heavier symptoms.." Our family/friends anecdotal evidence = lighter line correlates with few/no symptoms. Heavier line = more symptoms/more unwell. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I though that S Gene missing in a PCR test was an indication of Omicron variant? Omicron still shows on a LFT." S gene drop-out on qPCR can indicate omicron but just to clarify the virus still has spike protein. The drop out is due to mutation(s) at probe annealing site. Would still need to be sequenced to confirm. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From people I know testing positive for COVID and observations of the Lateral Flow Test they took. Seems the Omicron variant may turn the Test marker positive very quickly, almost as soon as it hits the 'C' marker on the Tests display. It normally takes a few minutes for the Positive marker to change but seems since Omicron showed its face, it might be reacting quicker. A number of friends and colleagues working in hospitals have seen this and although not had sequencing confirmation, it is likely a quick developing Test is might be an indicator of having Omicron variant. There is nothing scientific behind this but many I have heard of testing positive have said they were surprised at the almost instant result once the solution travelled through into test markers and had not seen it prior to this variant being around." Aye | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I tested positive in July. Mine turned it positive when it hit the T and again the C markers. No waiting at all. " Yes. Delta was like that for me in September. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From people I know testing positive for COVID and observations of the Lateral Flow Test they took. Seems the Omicron variant may turn the Test marker positive very quickly, almost as soon as it hits the 'C' marker on the Tests display. It normally takes a few minutes for the Positive marker to change but seems since Omicron showed its face, it might be reacting quicker. A number of friends and colleagues working in hospitals have seen this and although not had sequencing confirmation, it is likely a quick developing Test is might be an indicator of having Omicron variant. There is nothing scientific behind this but many I have heard of testing positive have said they were surprised at the almost instant result once the solution travelled through into test markers and had not seen it prior to this variant being around." I had three negative LFTs last week and had a positive PCR. The Omicron variant is taking longer to show symptoms and on LFTs as far as I’m concerned. No one else in my house has tested positive. I’ve been in bed since Christmas Eve. It’s definitely worse than a mild cold. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |