Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Virus |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A legal notice is served by Indian Bar Association (IBA) upon Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist at the World Health Organisation (WHO) on May 25, 2021 for her act of spreading disinformation and misguiding the people of India, in order to fulfil her agenda. The notice is based on the research and clinical trials carried out by ‘Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance’ (FLCCC) and the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) Panel, who have presented enormous data that strengthen the case for recommendation of Ivermectin in prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has ignored these studies/reports and has deliberately suppressed the data regarding effectiveness of the drug Ivermectin, with an intent to dissuade the people of India from using Ivermectin. However, the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) and All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Delhi have refused to accept her stand and have retained the recommendation for Ivermectin under ‘May Do’ category, for patients with mild symptoms and those in home isolation, as stated in ‘The National Guidelines for COVID-19 management’ last updated on May 17, 2021. In order to stop Dr. Soumya Swaminathan from causing further damage to the life of citizens of this country, IBA has decided to initiate legal action against her and as part of the process, a legal notice has been served upon her. "Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC...Dr Pierre Kory and his team are dedicated professionals and they should be commended for their work, in saving people lives.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A legal notice is served by Indian Bar Association (IBA) upon Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist at the World Health Organisation (WHO) on May 25, 2021 for her act of spreading disinformation and misguiding the people of India, in order to fulfil her agenda. The notice is based on the research and clinical trials carried out by ‘Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance’ (FLCCC) and the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) Panel, who have presented enormous data that strengthen the case for recommendation of Ivermectin in prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has ignored these studies/reports and has deliberately suppressed the data regarding effectiveness of the drug Ivermectin, with an intent to dissuade the people of India from using Ivermectin. However, the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) and All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Delhi have refused to accept her stand and have retained the recommendation for Ivermectin under ‘May Do’ category, for patients with mild symptoms and those in home isolation, as stated in ‘The National Guidelines for COVID-19 management’ last updated on May 17, 2021. In order to stop Dr. Soumya Swaminathan from causing further damage to the life of citizens of this country, IBA has decided to initiate legal action against her and as part of the process, a legal notice has been served upon her.
Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC...Dr Pierre Kory and his team are dedicated professionals and they should be commended for their work, in saving people lives. "Yeah, out there 'where the rubber hits the road'. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author , has just published an article titled “The Drug That Cracked Covid” Capuzzo, is a six-time Pulitzer-nominated journalist, he chronicles the frontline doctors on all continents who are having a massive struggle to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment, as well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets and social media companies to thwart them. For his part, Capuzzo, as a reporter, “saw with his own eyes the other side of the story” that has gone unreported, of the many patients in the US whose lives have been saved by ivermectin and of five of the doctors that have led the battle to save lives around the world, Paul Marik, Umberto Meduri, José Iglesias, Pierre Kory and Joe Varon. These are all highly decorated doctors. Through their leadership of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, they have already enhanced our treatment of Covid-19 by discovering and promoting the use of Corticoid steroids against the virus. But their calls for ivermectin to also be used have met with a wall of resistance from healthcare regulators and a wall of silence from media outlets." Power corrupts.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author , has just published an article titled “The Drug That Cracked Covid” Capuzzo, is a six-time Pulitzer-nominated journalist, he chronicles the frontline doctors on all continents who are having a massive struggle to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment, as well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets and social media companies to thwart them. For his part, Capuzzo, as a reporter, “saw with his own eyes the other side of the story” that has gone unreported, of the many patients in the US whose lives have been saved by ivermectin and of five of the doctors that have led the battle to save lives around the world, Paul Marik, Umberto Meduri, José Iglesias, Pierre Kory and Joe Varon. These are all highly decorated doctors. Through their leadership of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, they have already enhanced our treatment of Covid-19 by discovering and promoting the use of Corticoid steroids against the virus. But their calls for ivermectin to also be used have met with a wall of resistance from healthcare regulators and a wall of silence from media outlets. Power corrupts. "Absolutely | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are numerous firsthand accounts from doctors the world over that a number of readily available treatments are highly effective for covid. Yes, Invermectin, Hydroxichloroquine, Vitam C and D, Zinc among others. The reason they're not adopted widely are simple, they're cheap and no profit is to be made. What little trust I had in the bodies of the medical establishment went out the window as soon as they started to say Hydroxichloroquine was potentially dangerous when its been safely used for decades. The backlash was such that Lancet had to retract its study. I'd much rather trust in what the frontline professionals are saying than "experts" of regulatory bodies that have been captured by special interests or academics in ivory towers who are detached from what occurs on the ground." My mum is on clinical trial drugs for terminal cancer…stopped her tumour growth for 5 years.. might have stopped it for a month. That’s why it’s a trial. Go visit the BMC for any evidenced based approaches/clarifications and “proof” for effectiveness of medicinal treatments.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are numerous firsthand accounts from doctors the world over that a number of readily available treatments are highly effective for covid. Yes, Invermectin, Hydroxichloroquine, Vitam C and D, Zinc among others. The reason they're not adopted widely are simple, they're cheap and no profit is to be made. What little trust I had in the bodies of the medical establishment went out the window as soon as they started to say Hydroxichloroquine was potentially dangerous when its been safely used for decades. The backlash was such that Lancet had to retract its study. I'd much rather trust in what the frontline professionals are saying than "experts" of regulatory bodies that have been captured by special interests or academics in ivory towers who are detached from what occurs on the ground." The thing with some of these medications is that while yes trials may show some promise towards helping manage the severity of covid symptoms it is the dosage levels that bring risk of increased side effects, yes they have been used for years to treat other conditions at dosages that have been trailed and proven safe, to be of use against covid requires massively larger doses which may not be safe for use in humans or could cause sever sid3 effects. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are numerous firsthand accounts from doctors the world over that a number of readily available treatments are highly effective for covid. Yes, Invermectin, Hydroxichloroquine, Vitam C and D, Zinc among others. The reason they're not adopted widely are simple, they're cheap and no profit is to be made. What little trust I had in the bodies of the medical establishment went out the window as soon as they started to say Hydroxichloroquine was potentially dangerous when its been safely used for decades. The backlash was such that Lancet had to retract its study. I'd much rather trust in what the frontline professionals are saying than "experts" of regulatory bodies that have been captured by special interests or academics in ivory towers who are detached from what occurs on the ground. The thing with some of these medications is that while yes trials may show some promise towards helping manage the severity of covid symptoms it is the dosage levels that bring risk of increased side effects, yes they have been used for years to treat other conditions at dosages that have been trailed and proven safe, to be of use against covid requires massively larger doses which may not be safe for use in humans or could cause sever sid3 effects." That's a myth. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are numerous firsthand accounts from doctors the world over that a number of readily available treatments are highly effective for covid. Yes, Invermectin, Hydroxichloroquine, Vitam C and D, Zinc among others. The reason they're not adopted widely are simple, they're cheap and no profit is to be made. What little trust I had in the bodies of the medical establishment went out the window as soon as they started to say Hydroxichloroquine was potentially dangerous when its been safely used for decades. The backlash was such that Lancet had to retract its study. I'd much rather trust in what the frontline professionals are saying than "experts" of regulatory bodies that have been captured by special interests or academics in ivory towers who are detached from what occurs on the ground. The thing with some of these medications is that while yes trials may show some promise towards helping manage the severity of covid symptoms it is the dosage levels that bring risk of increased side effects, yes they have been used for years to treat other conditions at dosages that have been trailed and proven safe, to be of use against covid requires massively larger doses which may not be safe for use in humans or could cause sever sid3 effects. That's a myth." Sorry but not a myth it is medical fact that medications have a dosage limit for use in humans and animals alike if you would like to check this you only have to look at the BNF which is an online resource used by the medical profession that lists safe dosage levels for all medication it is easily accessible to the general public if you look it up on Google it also lists all side effects and dosage intervals. Please feel free to cite your resources that prove this to be a myth | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just listening to a very lengthy (1hr43), and very damning interview with Dr. Peter McCullough on the dreadful negligence of the medical profession in refusing to treat Covid19 in the first 2 weeks of infection. He has 40 peer reviewed papers out on Covid 19, so he is no maverick. He also calls for an urgent investigation into vaccine side effects and based on reports of 4000 deaths in the USA, and 10000 deaths in Europe he is advising his patients NOT to have the vaccine now. ............. "He has been the world's most prominent and vocal advocate for early outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection in order to prevent hospitalization and death. On May 19, 2021, he was interviewed regarding his efforts as a treating physician and researcher. From his unique vantage point, he has observed and documented a PROFOUNDLY DISTURBING POLICY RESPONSE to the pandemic -- a policy response that may prove to be the greatest malpractice and malfeasance in the history of medicine and public health. Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, and Professor of Medicine at Texas A & M College of Medicine, Dallas, TX USA. Since the outset of the pandemic, Dr. McCullough has been a leader in the medical response to the COVID-19 disaster and has published “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection” the first synthesis of sequenced multidrug treatment of ambulatory patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the American Journal of Medicine and subsequently updated in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. He has 40 peer-reviewed publications on the infection and has commented extensively on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis in TheHill and on FOX NEWS Channel. On November 19, 2020, Dr. McCullough testified in the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and throughout 2021 in the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Colorado General Assembly, and New Hampshire Senate concerning many aspects of the pandemic response. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC, FAHA, FCRSA, FCCP, FNKF, FNLA Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine Board Certified Internist and Cardiologist President Cardiorenal Society of America Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine Editor-in-Chief, Cardiorenal Medicine Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology" Ok so yes the man is clearly an expert in his fields has clearly raised concerns regarding the lack of early treatment of the covid virus and the risks of using the vaccine, but there is nothing in what you have posted that has any relevance to my comment regarding the risks of using currently available medications in excess of the currently recommended and approved safe dosage levels, all medications have an overdose risk (this is why the BNF lists them) at these levels the risks of damage to the body and the risk of sever side effects is greatly increased. This is not myth this is proven medical fact. I agree trials need to be conducted to see if other currently licenced medications can be used to aid in the early treatment of the virus, but we need to know that the dosages required are still safe or surely it would be no different to using the vaccine that so many people are worried about taking (both me and my mother are fully vaccinated and where lucky enough to have no side effects) don't get me wrong I am all for finding away out of this pandemic but the research needs to be conducted first, what if one of the medications refferanced in this thread was to be administered to people at the dosages required to treat covid without the relivent testing and people start dying from that and suffering life changing side effects would you then view that medication the same as the vaccine? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just listening to a very lengthy (1hr43), and very damning interview with Dr. Peter McCullough on the dreadful negligence of the medical profession in refusing to treat Covid19 in the first 2 weeks of infection. He has 40 peer reviewed papers out on Covid 19, so he is no maverick. He also calls for an urgent investigation into vaccine side effects and based on reports of 4000 deaths in the USA, and 10000 deaths in Europe he is advising his patients NOT to have the vaccine now. ............. "He has been the world's most prominent and vocal advocate for early outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection in order to prevent hospitalization and death. On May 19, 2021, he was interviewed regarding his efforts as a treating physician and researcher. From his unique vantage point, he has observed and documented a PROFOUNDLY DISTURBING POLICY RESPONSE to the pandemic -- a policy response that may prove to be the greatest malpractice and malfeasance in the history of medicine and public health. Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, and Professor of Medicine at Texas A & M College of Medicine, Dallas, TX USA. Since the outset of the pandemic, Dr. McCullough has been a leader in the medical response to the COVID-19 disaster and has published “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection” the first synthesis of sequenced multidrug treatment of ambulatory patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the American Journal of Medicine and subsequently updated in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. He has 40 peer-reviewed publications on the infection and has commented extensively on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis in TheHill and on FOX NEWS Channel. On November 19, 2020, Dr. McCullough testified in the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and throughout 2021 in the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Colorado General Assembly, and New Hampshire Senate concerning many aspects of the pandemic response. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC, FAHA, FCRSA, FCCP, FNKF, FNLA Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine Board Certified Internist and Cardiologist President Cardiorenal Society of America Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine Editor-in-Chief, Cardiorenal Medicine Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology Ok so yes the man is clearly an expert in his fields has clearly raised concerns regarding the lack of early treatment of the covid virus and the risks of using the vaccine, but there is nothing in what you have posted that has any relevance to my comment regarding the risks of using currently available medications in excess of the currently recommended and approved safe dosage levels, all medications have an overdose risk (this is why the BNF lists them) at these levels the risks of damage to the body and the risk of sever side effects is greatly increased. This is not myth this is proven medical fact. I agree trials need to be conducted to see if other currently licenced medications can be used to aid in the early treatment of the virus, but we need to know that the dosages required are still safe or surely it would be no different to using the vaccine that so many people are worried about taking (both me and my mother are fully vaccinated and where lucky enough to have no side effects) don't get me wrong I am all for finding away out of this pandemic but the research needs to be conducted first, what if one of the medications refferanced in this thread was to be administered to people at the dosages required to treat covid without the relivent testing and people start dying from that and suffering life changing side effects would you then view that medication the same as the vaccine?" Lol, I suggest Doctors just go with the dosages that are ALREADY safely and successfully treating Covid19 in millions of people all over the world. You are believing a false narrative by the sound of things - don't believe anyone on a sex site, listen to Dr. McCullough, he explains it all in great detail. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just listening to a very lengthy (1hr43), and very damning interview with Dr. Peter McCullough on the dreadful negligence of the medical profession in refusing to treat Covid19 in the first 2 weeks of infection. He has 40 peer reviewed papers out on Covid 19, so he is no maverick. He also calls for an urgent investigation into vaccine side effects and based on reports of 4000 deaths in the USA, and 10000 deaths in Europe he is advising his patients NOT to have the vaccine now. ............. "He has been the world's most prominent and vocal advocate for early outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection in order to prevent hospitalization and death. On May 19, 2021, he was interviewed regarding his efforts as a treating physician and researcher. From his unique vantage point, he has observed and documented a PROFOUNDLY DISTURBING POLICY RESPONSE to the pandemic -- a policy response that may prove to be the greatest malpractice and malfeasance in the history of medicine and public health. Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, and Professor of Medicine at Texas A & M College of Medicine, Dallas, TX USA. Since the outset of the pandemic, Dr. McCullough has been a leader in the medical response to the COVID-19 disaster and has published “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection” the first synthesis of sequenced multidrug treatment of ambulatory patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the American Journal of Medicine and subsequently updated in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. He has 40 peer-reviewed publications on the infection and has commented extensively on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis in TheHill and on FOX NEWS Channel. On November 19, 2020, Dr. McCullough testified in the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and throughout 2021 in the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Colorado General Assembly, and New Hampshire Senate concerning many aspects of the pandemic response. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC, FAHA, FCRSA, FCCP, FNKF, FNLA Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine Board Certified Internist and Cardiologist President Cardiorenal Society of America Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine Editor-in-Chief, Cardiorenal Medicine Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology Ok so yes the man is clearly an expert in his fields has clearly raised concerns regarding the lack of early treatment of the covid virus and the risks of using the vaccine, but there is nothing in what you have posted that has any relevance to my comment regarding the risks of using currently available medications in excess of the currently recommended and approved safe dosage levels, all medications have an overdose risk (this is why the BNF lists them) at these levels the risks of damage to the body and the risk of sever side effects is greatly increased. This is not myth this is proven medical fact. I agree trials need to be conducted to see if other currently licenced medications can be used to aid in the early treatment of the virus, but we need to know that the dosages required are still safe or surely it would be no different to using the vaccine that so many people are worried about taking (both me and my mother are fully vaccinated and where lucky enough to have no side effects) don't get me wrong I am all for finding away out of this pandemic but the research needs to be conducted first, what if one of the medications refferanced in this thread was to be administered to people at the dosages required to treat covid without the relivent testing and people start dying from that and suffering life changing side effects would you then view that medication the same as the vaccine? Lol, I suggest Doctors just go with the dosages that are ALREADY safely and successfully treating Covid19 in millions of people all over the world. You are believing a false narrative by the sound of things - don't believe anyone on a sex site, listen to Dr. McCullough, he explains it all in great detail. " I say it again, no one ever gained wisdom by studying material that only reinforced their own predetermined ideas? Research, listen to people you do not like, watch Tucker Carlson interview Dr McCullough. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are numerous firsthand accounts from doctors the world over that a number of readily available treatments are highly effective for covid. Yes, Invermectin, Hydroxichloroquine, Vitam C and D, Zinc among others. The reason they're not adopted widely are simple, they're cheap and no profit is to be made. What little trust I had in the bodies of the medical establishment went out the window as soon as they started to say Hydroxichloroquine was potentially dangerous when its been safely used for decades. The backlash was such that Lancet had to retract its study. I'd much rather trust in what the frontline professionals are saying than "experts" of regulatory bodies that have been captured by special interests or academics in ivory towers who are detached from what occurs on the ground. The thing with some of these medications is that while yes trials may show some promise towards helping manage the severity of covid symptoms it is the dosage levels that bring risk of increased side effects, yes they have been used for years to treat other conditions at dosages that have been trailed and proven safe, to be of use against covid requires massively larger doses which may not be safe for use in humans or could cause sever sid3 effects." The doctors that have been using these medications with great effect and reporting virtually 0% fatalities with early intervention have not seen any adverse side effects. The treatments are also short term with little risk of toxicity. I think it's preferable to taking something experimental with so many unknowns re long term effects (vaccines). And I ask the question - why are doctors being prevented from using these well known solutions due to "concerns" and no previous robust studies, but an experimental product with no long term safety testing is granted emergency authorization of use? And to top it off touted as the "solution"? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are numerous firsthand accounts from doctors the world over that a number of readily available treatments are highly effective for covid. Yes, Invermectin, Hydroxichloroquine, Vitam C and D, Zinc among others. The reason they're not adopted widely are simple, they're cheap and no profit is to be made. What little trust I had in the bodies of the medical establishment went out the window as soon as they started to say Hydroxichloroquine was potentially dangerous when its been safely used for decades. The backlash was such that Lancet had to retract its study. I'd much rather trust in what the frontline professionals are saying than "experts" of regulatory bodies that have been captured by special interests or academics in ivory towers who are detached from what occurs on the ground. The thing with some of these medications is that while yes trials may show some promise towards helping manage the severity of covid symptoms it is the dosage levels that bring risk of increased side effects, yes they have been used for years to treat other conditions at dosages that have been trailed and proven safe, to be of use against covid requires massively larger doses which may not be safe for use in humans or could cause sever sid3 effects. The doctors that have been using these medications with great effect and reporting virtually 0% fatalities with early intervention have not seen any adverse side effects. The treatments are also short term with little risk of toxicity. I think it's preferable to taking something experimental with so many unknowns re long term effects (vaccines). And I ask the question - why are doctors being prevented from using these well known solutions due to "concerns" and no previous robust studies, but an experimental product with no long term safety testing is granted emergency authorization of use? And to top it off touted as the "solution"?" Just finished listening to the interview and I am speechless. It's dynamite. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author , has just published an article titled “The Drug That Cracked Covid” Capuzzo, is a six-time Pulitzer-nominated journalist, he chronicles the frontline doctors on all continents who are having a massive struggle to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment, as well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets and social media companies to thwart them. For his part, Capuzzo, as a reporter, “saw with his own eyes the other side of the story” that has gone unreported, of the many patients in the US whose lives have been saved by ivermectin and of five of the doctors that have led the battle to save lives around the world, Paul Marik, Umberto Meduri, José Iglesias, Pierre Kory and Joe Varon. These are all highly decorated doctors. Through their leadership of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, they have already enhanced our treatment of Covid-19 by discovering and promoting the use of Corticoid steroids against the virus. But their calls for ivermectin to also be used have met with a wall of resistance from healthcare regulators and a wall of silence from media outlets." I didn't understand 'til listening to this interview this morning just how many drugs are being successfully used, and always in combination, by Doctors on the frontline. There are a vast array, and all of the successful early treatment protocols have been suppressed in favour of trials with people in hospital on deaths door!! It's too late by then!! It is appalling, hundreds of thousands have died unecessarily. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author , has just published an article titled “The Drug That Cracked Covid” Capuzzo, is a six-time Pulitzer-nominated journalist, he chronicles the frontline doctors on all continents who are having a massive struggle to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment, as well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets and social media companies to thwart them. For his part, Capuzzo, as a reporter, “saw with his own eyes the other side of the story” that has gone unreported, of the many patients in the US whose lives have been saved by ivermectin and of five of the doctors that have led the battle to save lives around the world, Paul Marik, Umberto Meduri, José Iglesias, Pierre Kory and Joe Varon. These are all highly decorated doctors. Through their leadership of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, they have already enhanced our treatment of Covid-19 by discovering and promoting the use of Corticoid steroids against the virus. But their calls for ivermectin to also be used have met with a wall of resistance from healthcare regulators and a wall of silence from media outlets. I didn't understand 'til listening to this interview this morning just how many drugs are being successfully used, and always in combination, by Doctors on the frontline. There are a vast array, and all of the successful early treatment protocols have been suppressed in favour of trials with people in hospital on deaths door!! It's too late by then!! It is appalling, hundreds of thousands have died unecessarily." If true it's criminal malfeasance, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Where are the usual covid fear mongers and vaccine advocates? Maybe they're reading up on some more "science"" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author , has just published an article titled “The Drug That Cracked Covid” Capuzzo, is a six-time Pulitzer-nominated journalist, he chronicles the frontline doctors on all continents who are having a massive struggle to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment, as well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets and social media companies to thwart them. For his part, Capuzzo, as a reporter, “saw with his own eyes the other side of the story” that has gone unreported, of the many patients in the US whose lives have been saved by ivermectin and of five of the doctors that have led the battle to save lives around the world, Paul Marik, Umberto Meduri, José Iglesias, Pierre Kory and Joe Varon. These are all highly decorated doctors. Through their leadership of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, they have already enhanced our treatment of Covid-19 by discovering and promoting the use of Corticoid steroids against the virus. But their calls for ivermectin to also be used have met with a wall of resistance from healthcare regulators and a wall of silence from media outlets. I didn't understand 'til listening to this interview this morning just how many drugs are being successfully used, and always in combination, by Doctors on the frontline. There are a vast array, and all of the successful early treatment protocols have been suppressed in favour of trials with people in hospital on deaths door!! It's too late by then!! It is appalling, hundreds of thousands have died unecessarily. If true it's criminal malfeasance," It is. I remember now I saw this video of his testimony to Texas Senate HHS Committee a while back: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author , has just published an article titled “The Drug That Cracked Covid” Capuzzo, is a six-time Pulitzer-nominated journalist, he chronicles the frontline doctors on all continents who are having a massive struggle to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment, as well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets and social media companies to thwart them. For his part, Capuzzo, as a reporter, “saw with his own eyes the other side of the story” that has gone unreported, of the many patients in the US whose lives have been saved by ivermectin and of five of the doctors that have led the battle to save lives around the world, Paul Marik, Umberto Meduri, José Iglesias, Pierre Kory and Joe Varon. These are all highly decorated doctors. Through their leadership of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, they have already enhanced our treatment of Covid-19 by discovering and promoting the use of Corticoid steroids against the virus. But their calls for ivermectin to also be used have met with a wall of resistance from healthcare regulators and a wall of silence from media outlets. I didn't understand 'til listening to this interview this morning just how many drugs are being successfully used, and always in combination, by Doctors on the frontline. There are a vast array, and all of the successful early treatment protocols have been suppressed in favour of trials with people in hospital on deaths door!! It's too late by then!! It is appalling, hundreds of thousands have died unecessarily. If true it's criminal malfeasance, It is. I remember now I saw this video of his testimony to Texas Senate HHS Committee a while back: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM"
Everyone should watch this today. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author , has just published an article titled “The Drug That Cracked Covid” Capuzzo, is a six-time Pulitzer-nominated journalist, he chronicles the frontline doctors on all continents who are having a massive struggle to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment, as well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets and social media companies to thwart them. For his part, Capuzzo, as a reporter, “saw with his own eyes the other side of the story” that has gone unreported, of the many patients in the US whose lives have been saved by ivermectin and of five of the doctors that have led the battle to save lives around the world, Paul Marik, Umberto Meduri, José Iglesias, Pierre Kory and Joe Varon. These are all highly decorated doctors. Through their leadership of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, they have already enhanced our treatment of Covid-19 by discovering and promoting the use of Corticoid steroids against the virus. But their calls for ivermectin to also be used have met with a wall of resistance from healthcare regulators and a wall of silence from media outlets. I didn't understand 'til listening to this interview this morning just how many drugs are being successfully used, and always in combination, by Doctors on the frontline. There are a vast array, and all of the successful early treatment protocols have been suppressed in favour of trials with people in hospital on deaths door!! It's too late by then!! It is appalling, hundreds of thousands have died unecessarily. If true it's criminal malfeasance, It is. I remember now I saw this video of his testimony to Texas Senate HHS Committee a while back: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM
Everyone should watch this today."Watch it and weep, what have we done, what have we allowed to happen. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Removed by poster at 31/05/21 13:11:20]" A must watch to gain better understanding of how this pandemic had been handled, these and many other Frontline Doctors have their own story to tell. I made some observations, its very moving and like Dr Pierre Kory, Dr McCullough only wants the best for his patients. In May 2020 it became known the virus was going to be amenable to a vaccine, all efforts on treatments were dropped, the national institute of health actually had a drug program, dropped it, warp speed for vaccine development. Silencing on any information on treatment, Twitter scrubbing information, couldn't get papers published. We cannot get information out in our own Medical literature Try to reduce the spread of the virus and wait for a VACINE. Peter McCullough MD testomony to Teax Senate HHS Committe | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
