FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Virus

big pharma morals

Jump to newest
 

By *rjim OP   Man
over a year ago

nr bristol

[Removed by poster at 17/02/21 12:00:51]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rjim OP   Man
over a year ago

nr bristol

Anyone for Tamiflu or remdesivir .

You know the drugs which made billions for the drug companies and which did not work.

So glad it can never happen again.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"Anyone for Tamiflu or remdesivir .

You know the drugs which made billions for the drug companies and which did not work.

So glad it can never happen again."

To be honest. If a company announced that they had a cure for Covid tomorrow, many governments would rush to buy it without data. They would want to ensure they got their share early just in case it worked, rather than being left behind if it was successful.

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hagTonightMan
over a year ago

From the land of haribos.

The interview that goldman sachs had with big pharma in 2018 was interesting about what they think about it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

Who was the guy who purchased the licence or something to do with a life saving drug that enabled him to sell it at extreme prices?

What a piece of work he was.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"The interview that goldman sachs had with big pharma in 2018 was interesting about what they think about it."

When it comes to people questioning morals etc, think there's many aspects of corporate big business especially financial services that are equally without ..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hagTonightMan
over a year ago

From the land of haribos.


"The interview that goldman sachs had with big pharma in 2018 was interesting about what they think about it.

When it comes to people questioning morals etc, think there's many aspects of corporate big business especially financial services that are equally without .."
Yes there are as well. I think that for the big pharma, profit is more important.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The interview that goldman sachs had with big pharma in 2018 was interesting about what they think about it.

When it comes to people questioning morals etc, think there's many aspects of corporate big business especially financial services that are equally without ..Yes there are as well. I think that for the big pharma, profit is more important."

To be honest, that is what corporations exist for. It is a function of capitalism. Without the prospect of profit, the products wouldn't be researched and developed in the first place.

Most of us want to pay as little tax as possible, thus by implication, we are not willing to centrally fund things like this sufficiency. The only alternative is to leave it to the market.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
over a year ago

Hastings


"The interview that goldman sachs had with big pharma in 2018 was interesting about what they think about it.

When it comes to people questioning morals etc, think there's many aspects of corporate big business especially financial services that are equally without .."

Yep interest is now at an all-time hi but banks are still charging well over the top for credit and loans

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estivalMan
over a year ago

borehamwood


"The interview that goldman sachs had with big pharma in 2018 was interesting about what they think about it.

When it comes to people questioning morals etc, think there's many aspects of corporate big business especially financial services that are equally without ..Yes there are as well. I think that for the big pharma, profit is more important."

Of course profit is more important there companys with shareholders there in it to make money,there aint many companys out there that are in buisness to make em selves feel good.its all about the cash

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *achel SmythTV/TS
over a year ago

Farnborough


"The interview that goldman sachs had with big pharma in 2018 was interesting about what they think about it.

When it comes to people questioning morals etc, think there's many aspects of corporate big business especially financial services that are equally without ..Yes there are as well. I think that for the big pharma, profit is more important.

To be honest, that is what corporations exist for. It is a function of capitalism. Without the prospect of profit, the products wouldn't be researched and developed in the first place.

Most of us want to pay as little tax as possible, thus by implication, we are not willing to centrally fund things like this sufficiency. The only alternative is to leave it to the market."

Agree with you Jennie xxx

Pharma companies are private corporations that have to make money in order to survive.... if they didn’t there would be minimal investment into R&D .... Governments simply do not have the resources or money to put into it.

The Pharma industry re-invests 20% of income into R&D alone (more than any other industry)... and have to pay for the 100s of New Chemical Entities that it researches to various levels that do not make it to market for efficacy or safety reasons.

It is private companies that have developed and brought to market almost every life saving medication we take for granted.

Easy to knock them - but we can’t do without them!

R xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top