Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Virus |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There has to be a better way of reintroducing kids to education. It's obvious that home schooling is leaving some kids behind whilst it's also obvious that schools don't have the physical capacity to reopen in the same way as before covid." I think you're right and I don't really have an answer as to what can be done. It was sad to see a FB post the other day with a parent saying they had given up with home schooling (too much aggravation) and was over the moon their child had so many followers on tick tock & thought this was a great way to spend their days. These children will sadly be left way behind (not suggesting they were ever in the top sets/classes, but tick tock isn't a substitute for education) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"most of the parents around here dont care, this morning the sledges were back out etc ... i asked how the home schooling was going and got a scowl for my troubles though you wont find any asian kids out playing in the snow, they will be studying and becoming lawyers, doctors etc " What's wrong with having a snow day? Kids need to have fun too, one day won't do them any harm. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"most of the parents around here dont care, this morning the sledges were back out etc ... i asked how the home schooling was going and got a scowl for my troubles though you wont find any asian kids out playing in the snow, they will be studying and becoming lawyers, doctors etc " I've been out with mine this morning, call it break time if you like! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"most of the parents around here dont care, this morning the sledges were back out etc ... i asked how the home schooling was going and got a scowl for my troubles though you wont find any asian kids out playing in the snow, they will be studying and becoming lawyers, doctors etc " Outdoors can be part of home schooling to, it isn’t all about sitting glued to a laptop | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Schools and universities are at the heart of the second wave. Complicated by the fact that our borders are wide open. I live in a very residential area but also next to university residencies. It was the highest number of cases in the city in September/October. They keep pumping out the message distancing, masks and cleaning hands. You have to queue to get Ito shops but we can have a primary school with over 500 kids open with out any of the rules. It’s nonsensical " Agree with this 100% plus adding that supermarkets need to do more I went to waitrose thinking it would be fine....no it was rammed with people almost tumbling over each other to get their shopping and it's like it in every supermarket I've been to | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"most of the parents around here dont care, this morning the sledges were back out etc ... i asked how the home schooling was going and got a scowl for my troubles though you wont find any asian kids out playing in the snow, they will be studying and becoming lawyers, doctors etc What's wrong with having a snow day? Kids need to have fun too, one day won't do them any harm. " so you would of kept them off if the schools were open? cant have it both ways bit of difference in educating kids outdoors or playing on sledges, like a said ... the same parents will be on face ache moaning about the schools being shut, then blaming the government in the kids low grades. home schooling, only get out what you put in. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"most of the parents around here dont care, this morning the sledges were back out etc ... i asked how the home schooling was going and got a scowl for my troubles though you wont find any asian kids out playing in the snow, they will be studying and becoming lawyers, doctors etc What's wrong with having a snow day? Kids need to have fun too, one day won't do them any harm. so you would of kept them off if the schools were open? cant have it both ways bit of difference in educating kids outdoors or playing on sledges, like a said ... the same parents will be on face ache moaning about the schools being shut, then blaming the government in the kids low grades. home schooling, only get out what you put in." No, I wouldn't of deliberately kept them off unless I couldn't physically get them to school because of the snow but schools do close sometimes when it's snowed. Life isn't normal right now though so if we had had snow (we didn't get any ) yes, I would of taken mine out to play in it for a bit. They would still of done their work though and I can't see any of their teachers holding it against me somehow. Yes, you only get out what you put in but you can't force a child to learn and I can't imagine there are many parent's out there that want to stress their kids out with schoolwork at the moment. Doesn't mean it's not getting done, just means us understanding that they are people with feelings too and can also be struggling with the situation. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"most of the parents around here dont care, this morning the sledges were back out etc ... i asked how the home schooling was going and got a scowl for my troubles though you wont find any asian kids out playing in the snow, they will be studying and becoming lawyers, doctors etc What's wrong with having a snow day? Kids need to have fun too, one day won't do them any harm. so you would of kept them off if the schools were open? cant have it both ways bit of difference in educating kids outdoors or playing on sledges, like a said ... the same parents will be on face ache moaning about the schools being shut, then blaming the government in the kids low grades. home schooling, only get out what you put in. No, I wouldn't of deliberately kept them off unless I couldn't physically get them to school because of the snow but schools do close sometimes when it's snowed. Life isn't normal right now though so if we had had snow (we didn't get any ) yes, I would of taken mine out to play in it for a bit. They would still of done their work though and I can't see any of their teachers holding it against me somehow. Yes, you only get out what you put in but you can't force a child to learn and I can't imagine there are many parent's out there that want to stress their kids out with schoolwork at the moment. Doesn't mean it's not getting done, just means us understanding that they are people with feelings too and can also be struggling with the situation. " hence why i made the asian comment, can guarantee a large majority of asian kids would of been sat at home with books or watching educational programes for most of the day. dont get me wrong, i was a right sod at school, and any excuse not to attend etc now i look back and wonder what could of been etc | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The big jump in cases was over Xmas when schools were shut. No accident that it was indoor family mixing on or around the 25th. One to two weeks later we hit peak infection. One to two weeks after that we hit peak deaths as cases decline. Please don't call the kids super spreaders. It is not accurate and those poor kids are the ones who are going to be paying the furlough debt back for the next 100 years. " unfortunately they are, our Autistic daughter could have only caught covid from school, all other household members tested negative, and only contact she has had is from a learning pack from school, smack bang in middle of when test and track said she got infected. I'm only person to leave house, doubled masked and throw away gloves, dissinfect in car as both our daughters have micro deletion of a chromosome. We didn't realise the special gift for daughter in pack was a 2nd hand dinosaur book. Luckily we all came out of quarantine yesterday safely, with no lasting damage. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The big jump in cases was over Xmas when schools were shut. No accident that it was indoor family mixing on or around the 25th. One to two weeks later we hit peak infection. One to two weeks after that we hit peak deaths as cases decline. Please don't call the kids super spreaders. It is not accurate and those poor kids are the ones who are going to be paying the furlough debt back for the next 100 years. unfortunately they are, our Autistic daughter could have only caught covid from school, all other household members tested negative, and only contact she has had is from a learning pack from school, smack bang in middle of when test and track said she got infected. I'm only person to leave house, doubled masked and throw away gloves, dissinfect in car as both our daughters have micro deletion of a chromosome. We didn't realise the special gift for daughter in pack was a 2nd hand dinosaur book. Luckily we all came out of quarantine yesterday safely, with no lasting damage." Glad you are OK Its still possible no child was involved in this transmission chain. Could it have been a false positive or did she have symptoms? If the virus was carried on the book it could just as easily have been contaminated by an adult rather than a child. You are doing all the right things. Keep safe | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The big jump in cases was over Xmas when schools were shut. No accident that it was indoor family mixing on or around the 25th. One to two weeks later we hit peak infection. One to two weeks after that we hit peak deaths as cases decline. Please don't call the kids super spreaders. It is not accurate and those poor kids are the ones who are going to be paying the furlough debt back for the next 100 years. unfortunately they are, our Autistic daughter could have only caught covid from school, all other household members tested negative, and only contact she has had is from a learning pack from school, smack bang in middle of when test and track said she got infected. I'm only person to leave house, doubled masked and throw away gloves, dissinfect in car as both our daughters have micro deletion of a chromosome. We didn't realise the special gift for daughter in pack was a 2nd hand dinosaur book. Luckily we all came out of quarantine yesterday safely, with no lasting damage. Glad you are OK Its still possible no child was involved in this transmission chain. Could it have been a false positive or did she have symptoms? If the virus was carried on the book it could just as easily have been contaminated by an adult rather than a child. You are doing all the right things. Keep safe " she had symptoms but mild, unfortunately our one person in support bubble caught it from her, but we didn't... we put her in isolation in biggest room, which she enjoyed!!! ... (autistic). And yes may of been a adult from school but to be honest, their attitude was don't care, not our problem, to the point t I called them fucking idiots over phone. A trust school putting profit before safety again. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The big jump in cases was over Xmas when schools were shut. No accident that it was indoor family mixing on or around the 25th. One to two weeks later we hit peak infection. One to two weeks after that we hit peak deaths as cases decline. Please don't call the kids super spreaders. It is not accurate and those poor kids are the ones who are going to be paying the furlough debt back for the next 100 years. unfortunately they are, our Autistic daughter could have only caught covid from school, all other household members tested negative, and only contact she has had is from a learning pack from school, smack bang in middle of when test and track said she got infected. I'm only person to leave house, doubled masked and throw away gloves, dissinfect in car as both our daughters have micro deletion of a chromosome. We didn't realise the special gift for daughter in pack was a 2nd hand dinosaur book. Luckily we all came out of quarantine yesterday safely, with no lasting damage. Glad you are OK Its still possible no child was involved in this transmission chain. Could it have been a false positive or did she have symptoms? If the virus was carried on the book it could just as easily have been contaminated by an adult rather than a child. You are doing all the right things. Keep safe she had symptoms but mild, unfortunately our one person in support bubble caught it from her, but we didn't... we put her in isolation in biggest room, which she enjoyed!!! ... (autistic). And yes may of been a adult from school but to be honest, their attitude was don't care, not our problem, to the point t I called them fucking idiots over phone. A trust school putting profit before safety again." How do they profit from not informing other parents? You could have put one line on a facebook page or a parents whatsapp group and most parents within the school would have been aware in an hour would they not? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The problem here in North Devon is there is little or no teaching going on. Many keyworker children are being 'babysat' in Primary Schools not educated. " I suspect the same in true of many who are sat at home. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The big jump in cases was over Xmas when schools were shut. No accident that it was indoor family mixing on or around the 25th. One to two weeks later we hit peak infection. One to two weeks after that we hit peak deaths as cases decline. Please don't call the kids super spreaders. It is not accurate and those poor kids are the ones who are going to be paying the furlough debt back for the next 100 years. unfortunately they are, our Autistic daughter could have only caught covid from school, all other household members tested negative, and only contact she has had is from a learning pack from school, smack bang in middle of when test and track said she got infected. I'm only person to leave house, doubled masked and throw away gloves, dissinfect in car as both our daughters have micro deletion of a chromosome. We didn't realise the special gift for daughter in pack was a 2nd hand dinosaur book. Luckily we all came out of quarantine yesterday safely, with no lasting damage. Glad you are OK Its still possible no child was involved in this transmission chain. Could it have been a false positive or did she have symptoms? If the virus was carried on the book it could just as easily have been contaminated by an adult rather than a child. You are doing all the right things. Keep safe she had symptoms but mild, unfortunately our one person in support bubble caught it from her, but we didn't... we put her in isolation in biggest room, which she enjoyed!!! ... (autistic). And yes may of been a adult from school but to be honest, their attitude was don't care, not our problem, to the point t I called them fucking idiots over phone. A trust school putting profit before safety again." I’m not getting the profit comment. How do they profit? They probably didn’t inform parents it was transmitted via a book as it’s impossible to prove that. You have no evidence to support that, just an assumption. To report something without facts could cause hysteria. I can understand parents are upset when their child gets ill but it’s not really the school staff’s fault. I can guarantee the staff would rather be at home with their own families rather than risking their health by looking after other people’s children and getting abused for it. I’m glad your daughter is feeling better. Lou x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"most of the parents around here dont care, this morning the sledges were back out etc ... i asked how the home schooling was going and got a scowl for my troubles though you wont find any asian kids out playing in the snow, they will be studying and becoming lawyers, doctors etc I've been out with mine this morning, call it break time if you like! " We go for regular walks, "PE lessons" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The big jump in cases was over Xmas when schools were shut. No accident that it was indoor family mixing on or around the 25th. One to two weeks later we hit peak infection. One to two weeks after that we hit peak deaths as cases decline. Please don't call the kids super spreaders. It is not accurate and those poor kids are the ones who are going to be paying the furlough debt back for the next 100 years. " My thoughts exactly, kids will be dealing with the fallout for this long after the vulnerable groups have passed away. I know it’s a horrible way to look at it. It’s not just the education right now that’s going to suffer, there will be a huge gap in all jobs soon from medical staff all the way to construction trades etc. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On the 6 o'clock news on Monday, headline item had a parent from Bromley who said that schools there had given notice that they were no longer going to provide any online learning. 20 minutes in, another item on schooling, a parent from Cambridge said his son has no lessons after 12 midday. Some of our employees are telling us that their kids have less than 15 minutes tuition a day. Which begs the question, what exactly are the teachers doing then?" More than 50% of pupils are in school due to the relaxation of the critical worker list by the government this means most teachers if not all are actually teaching as class sizes are being kept to 15 again - who exactly do you expect to teach the 50% at home? Here is what I have done Planned lessons for in school kids and home kids Marked work from in school kids from last week Called all the home kids Recorded 10 lessons for the at home kids Replied to 127 emails from parents moaning that their kids are hard work Replied to 89 emails from kids that are a delight abs telling me how they miss me Sorted the classroom out multiple times a day cleaning etc (not enough money to pay cleaners for multiple daily cleaning) Oh and taught a class of 18 keyworker children all week | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" unfortunately our one person in support bubble caught it from her" How do you know your daughter didn't catch it from the bubble person rather than the book? If you are so cautious about contamination, why didn't you leave the learning pack for 72 hours before you opened it ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On the 6 o'clock news on Monday, headline item had a parent from Bromley who said that schools there had given notice that they were no longer going to provide any online learning. 20 minutes in, another item on schooling, a parent from Cambridge said his son has no lessons after 12 midday. Some of our employees are telling us that their kids have less than 15 minutes tuition a day. Which begs the question, what exactly are the teachers doing then?" As we appear to be questioning other people’s professionalism id like to know what you have been doing at work all week. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On the 6 o'clock news on Monday, headline item had a parent from Bromley who said that schools there had given notice that they were no longer going to provide any online learning. 20 minutes in, another item on schooling, a parent from Cambridge said his son has no lessons after 12 midday. Some of our employees are telling us that their kids have less than 15 minutes tuition a day. Which begs the question, what exactly are the teachers doing then? More than 50% of pupils are in school due to the relaxation of the critical worker list by the government this means most teachers if not all are actually teaching as class sizes are being kept to 15 again - who exactly do you expect to teach the 50% at home? Here is what I have done Planned lessons for in school kids and home kids Marked work from in school kids from last week Called all the home kids Recorded 10 lessons for the at home kids Replied to 127 emails from parents moaning that their kids are hard work Replied to 89 emails from kids that are a delight abs telling me how they miss me Sorted the classroom out multiple times a day cleaning etc (not enough money to pay cleaners for multiple daily cleaning) Oh and taught a class of 18 keyworker children all week " . And on top of that many have children of their own to care for. And many have covid or are recovering from the after effects. Or looking after family members with it. And there are still training and planning meetings to attend to make sure all staff are up to date and delivering lessons appropriately. And then there are safeguarding meetings to attend and reports to write about vulnerable pupils. And some are collating and assessing pupils work for their GCSE and A Level results. And some are going out and delivering laptops or paper work packs to pupils. Most teachers I know are working their backsides off right now and they have the same fears and worries as everyone else. If people truly believe education is as important as they say then perhaps try should show some appreciation for the very people who provide the education. Lou. X | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"most of the parents around here dont care, this morning the sledges were back out etc ... i asked how the home schooling was going and got a scowl for my troubles though you wont find any asian kids out playing in the snow, they will be studying and becoming lawyers, doctors etc What's wrong with having a snow day? Kids need to have fun too, one day won't do them any harm. so you would of kept them off if the schools were open? cant have it both ways bit of difference in educating kids outdoors or playing on sledges, like a said ... the same parents will be on face ache moaning about the schools being shut, then blaming the government in the kids low grades. home schooling, only get out what you put in." My son gets lessons sent to him each day, not a full day, maybe max four lessons to do, and they aren't full lessons, more like a bit of reading, some questions on a subject. He's finished it all in around an hour every single day. The exact same thing is the case for all the other kids in his year and probably his entire school. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this." They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"From 8th March schools *may* start to go back " Was expecting this and tbh I’m not expecting them back at all this term and nor is the school. We still get the lessons whether in paper or online and the kids are working from 09.00 until 15.00 as the base, plus maybe 1/2 hours after to finish tasks set in lesson, before starting the next day | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them ." That’s because they were safe to open. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. " And what are you basing that on? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on?" The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. " Can kids not catch it and pass it onto their family? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. " Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September" 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th" Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can't fault my school this time. They are providing enough work for it not to be overwhelming, motivational 'assembly' type videos to watch etc. I do think that's because they are now in exam years whereas last April they weren't. Has anyone else found that?" I think it feels a bit more prepared this time round - better systems for the kids to log into and submit work, not just 'email a worksheet and let the parents mark it'. And I hear of a few places starting with more interactivity - Zoom etc. It's hard though. A head in Lancashire wrote to all the parents of her school basically saying 'whatever you're doing is great' - after her own kids school sent reams of work home every day. The whole 'extended critical worker' thing hasn't helped - I've no doubt some very dubious justifications have been used, which means teachers are busy teaching in-person and remotely. I heard on the grapevine that calls into schools spiked massively when the rumours about 'closed until Easter' started circulating! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse." So in your opinion..over the science led professionals? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse." They didn't really fall in December, there was a slight change, but wouldn't that have been because we were in lockdown anyway? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. They didn't really fall in December, there was a slight change, but wouldn't that have been because we were in lockdown today anyway?" There was a slight fall, it’s all peaks and troughs. My point is about schools, whilst I totally disagree with lockdowns this discussion was about whether or not the schools should be open. I think they should be open. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. So in your opinion..over the science led professionals?" The thing about science led professionals is they rarely agree on anything. There are plenty of these professionals that don’t think the schools should be closed. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. So in your opinion..over the science led professionals? The thing about science led professionals is they rarely agree on anything. There are plenty of these professionals that don’t think the schools should be closed." Why don't they follow the science (that I agree with) we say... Its truly pathetic how myopic we are at times. Here's an idea. Where community rates are low enough and well enough managed.. Let them open. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. They didn't really fall in December, there was a slight change, but wouldn't that have been because we were in lockdown today anyway? There was a slight fall, it’s all peaks and troughs. My point is about schools, whilst I totally disagree with lockdowns this discussion was about whether or not the schools should be open. I think they should be open." You gave your reason of "The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September" as to why you think they should open, I was correcting you on the stats. We are still talking about the same subject. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Here's an idea. Where community rates are low enough and well enough managed.. Let them open. " This is probably the best idea, a uniformed all go back to school could potentially be another mess to sort out | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Make your mind up... Close the schools was the cry... How can they be so stupid and leave schools open was the cry... Now.. Open the schools is the cry... How can they be so stupid and cruel to our kids education... We can't have it both ways.pick one and live with the consequences. As it surely is govt by Facebook right now. " They were told to close the schools They ignored it and threatened legal action if they opened. Then they opened for a day and suddenly decided it was too dangerous. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. So in your opinion..over the science led professionals? The thing about science led professionals is they rarely agree on anything. There are plenty of these professionals that don’t think the schools should be closed." Who like? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. So in your opinion..over the science led professionals? The thing about science led professionals is they rarely agree on anything. There are plenty of these professionals that don’t think the schools should be closed. Why don't they follow the science (that I agree with) we say... Its truly pathetic how myopic we are at times. Here's an idea. Where community rates are low enough and well enough managed.. Let them open. " That is a great idea but some kids would fall behind others simply because they live in a highly infected area. That wouldn’t be fair on them and they have missed out enough. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. So in your opinion..over the science led professionals? The thing about science led professionals is they rarely agree on anything. There are plenty of these professionals that don’t think the schools should be closed. Who like? " His about the 10,000+ doctors and professionals that signed the great barrington declaration? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. So in your opinion..over the science led professionals? The thing about science led professionals is they rarely agree on anything. There are plenty of these professionals that don’t think the schools should be closed. Who like? His about the 10,000+ doctors and professionals that signed the great barrington declaration?" Right ok. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. So in your opinion..over the science led professionals? The thing about science led professionals is they rarely agree on anything. There are plenty of these professionals that don’t think the schools should be closed. Who like? His about the 10,000+ doctors and professionals that signed the great barrington declaration? Right ok." Deaths fell in early december as there was a further lockdown in November. Schools ooened early sept, cases rose steeply within a week/10 days....deatgs started to shoot up by end of month leading to further lock down and schools closing again soon after. It doesnt matter what the disease is...kids are super spreaders. YES they may be relatively safe as dont get severe symptoms....but they live in the community with parents/grandparents etc who end up in hospital and dying Back to school 8th March us now being muted.....idiots! But the stats will tell soon after.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some good discussion here but I look at the school situation from a purely selfish POV. I want my year 11 daughter in school. For obvious reasons I hope. I also feel year 13 students should be in school. I'm happy to have my year 7 daughter at home until necessary though. Right or wrong it's how I feel about it." I feel like that. I have a yr10 and 12, they are desperate to get back. They are so worried about getting shit exam results | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can't fault my school this time. They are providing enough work for it not to be overwhelming, motivational 'assembly' type videos to watch etc. I do think that's because they are now in exam years whereas last April they weren't. Has anyone else found that?" In 1 week my 5 year old had 12 videos to watch, 5 online games to play, a picture book and had to act out and upload a video of, and 40 sheets of work which I had to print off and guide her through. I also have 3 other kids needing help and I'm currently doing overtime at work (from home) as I have a major milestone. It's breaking me a little tbh. I still think schools should stay closed though. Some (mine) just need to improve. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some good discussion here but I look at the school situation from a purely selfish POV. I want my year 11 daughter in school. For obvious reasons I hope. I also feel year 13 students should be in school. I'm happy to have my year 7 daughter at home until necessary though. Right or wrong it's how I feel about it. I feel like that. I have a yr10 and 12, they are desperate to get back. They are so worried about getting shit exam results " The talk is my daughter wont be doing GCSEs but I just fear that it's gonna impact her chances going forward. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. So in your opinion..over the science led professionals? The thing about science led professionals is they rarely agree on anything. There are plenty of these professionals that don’t think the schools should be closed. Who like? His about the 10,000+ doctors and professionals that signed the great barrington declaration? Right ok. Deaths fell in early december as there was a further lockdown in November. Schools ooened early sept, cases rose steeply within a week/10 days....deatgs started to shoot up by end of month leading to further lock down and schools closing again soon after. It doesnt matter what the disease is...kids are super spreaders. YES they may be relatively safe as dont get severe symptoms....but they live in the community with parents/grandparents etc who end up in hospital and dying Back to school 8th March us now being muted.....idiots! But the stats will tell soon after...." So what would you suggest? Keeping the schools shut till the virus magically disappears? We will have the elderly and vulnerable vaccinated by early Feb... at the very latest this is when the kids should go back but as I said earlier, I don’t think they should ever have closed. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. So in your opinion..over the science led professionals? The thing about science led professionals is they rarely agree on anything. There are plenty of these professionals that don’t think the schools should be closed. Who like? His about the 10,000+ doctors and professionals that signed the great barrington declaration?" I'd be interested to know how many of those are virologists or work in mental care. An optician could have signed it, but that doesn't mean they have any more knowledge on the subject than me, and I am in no way qualified to make those sorry of judgements. I'm kinda happy it's not me making these decisions though tbh. It feels like whatever we do will have a massive negative outcome | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some good discussion here but I look at the school situation from a purely selfish POV. I want my year 11 daughter in school. For obvious reasons I hope. I also feel year 13 students should be in school. I'm happy to have my year 7 daughter at home until necessary though. Right or wrong it's how I feel about it." Why don’t you volunteer to go help the teacher then ... I’m sure they’re crying out for help and if you think it’s ok for teachers to expose themselves to hundreds of kids then I’m sure you are happy with that risk to yourself | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this." Really? Long covid? I know ten teachers with covid right now three in hospital severely ill. One who’s kids are in care as she’s a single parent one 27 year old on a vent and one 7 year old who gave it to both grandparents who died. Why don’t your volunteer for the exposure if you think teachers lives are expendable | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. So in your opinion..over the science led professionals? The thing about science led professionals is they rarely agree on anything. There are plenty of these professionals that don’t think the schools should be closed. Who like? His about the 10,000+ doctors and professionals that signed the great barrington declaration? I'd be interested to know how many of those are virologists or work in mental care. An optician could have signed it, but that doesn't mean they have any more knowledge on the subject than me, and I am in no way qualified to make those sorry of judgements. I'm kinda happy it's not me making these decisions though tbh. It feels like whatever we do will have a massive negative outcome " Look it up, there are plenty of leading virologists and epidemiologist that have signed it. Although it’s not all about the virologist opinion. There are lots of other factors involved here and just listening to one point of view has, in my opinion, been the governments biggest mistake. Experts in mental health would have just as much weight in this debate as a virologist/epidemiologist. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. Really? Long covid? I know ten teachers with covid right now three in hospital severely ill. One who’s kids are in care as she’s a single parent one 27 year old on a vent and one 7 year old who gave it to both grandparents who died. Why don’t your volunteer for the exposure if you think teachers lives are expendable " And there are plenty of sad stories about kids not being in school and the effects that has. I agree there are some sad tales to be had, on both sides of the argument however I personally feel that closing the schools is a lot worse than having them open. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some good discussion here but I look at the school situation from a purely selfish POV. I want my year 11 daughter in school. For obvious reasons I hope. I also feel year 13 students should be in school. I'm happy to have my year 7 daughter at home until necessary though. Right or wrong it's how I feel about it. Why don’t you volunteer to go help the teacher then ... I’m sure they’re crying out for help and if you think it’s ok for teachers to expose themselves to hundreds of kids then I’m sure you are happy with that risk to yourself " You don't know my situation or how many people I'm exposed to. What an absolutely ridiculous comment | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some good discussion here but I look at the school situation from a purely selfish POV. I want my year 11 daughter in school. For obvious reasons I hope. I also feel year 13 students should be in school. I'm happy to have my year 7 daughter at home until necessary though. Right or wrong it's how I feel about it. I feel like that. I have a yr10 and 12, they are desperate to get back. They are so worried about getting shit exam results The talk is my daughter wont be doing GCSEs but I just fear that it's gonna impact her chances going forward. " Is she yr11 or 10? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some good discussion here but I look at the school situation from a purely selfish POV. I want my year 11 daughter in school. For obvious reasons I hope. I also feel year 13 students should be in school. I'm happy to have my year 7 daughter at home until necessary though. Right or wrong it's how I feel about it. I feel like that. I have a yr10 and 12, they are desperate to get back. They are so worried about getting shit exam results The talk is my daughter wont be doing GCSEs but I just fear that it's gonna impact her chances going forward. Is she yr11 or 10?" Year 11 now. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can't fault my school this time. They are providing enough work for it not to be overwhelming, motivational 'assembly' type videos to watch etc. I do think that's because they are now in exam years whereas last April they weren't. Has anyone else found that? In 1 week my 5 year old had 12 videos to watch, 5 online games to play, a picture book and had to act out and upload a video of, and 40 sheets of work which I had to print off and guide her through. I also have 3 other kids needing help and I'm currently doing overtime at work (from home) as I have a major milestone. It's breaking me a little tbh. I still think schools should stay closed though. Some (mine) just need to improve. " Christ, that's a lot, too much if you ask me. One of my colleagues is on furlough as she doesn't have childcare, and her kids around the same age get a similar amount. She's stressing every day. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"most schools are not totally shut they are taking in children of front line staff and vulnerable children a lot of special needs schools have been open all the time" And a lot of the headteachers are trying to get it that both parents have to be key workers...as a lot sending the kids into school have only one key worker parent...but they are sending kids in to be with their friends... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In parliament today boris was badgering starmer to say schools were safe...if they are safe why is he making almost 2 months as the earliest day to open them? It's obvious to anyone that opening the schools up will spread the virus. I know kids want to be back at school and they and their parents are worried about their mental health and education. It's just a shame the government didn't plan for this happening in the summer and sorted the laptop's out for them all." Not trying to point score on the slightest. Its embarrassing when he tries to take on starmer..just emphasising how far he is ,out of his depth. Like you said, if they were safe,they would be open. I wonder if that free broadband scheme is still seen as insanity? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In parliament today boris was badgering starmer to say schools were safe...if they are safe why is he making almost 2 months as the earliest day to open them? It's obvious to anyone that opening the schools up will spread the virus. I know kids want to be back at school and they and their parents are worried about their mental health and education. It's just a shame the government didn't plan for this happening in the summer and sorted the laptop's out for them all. Not trying to point score on the slightest. Its embarrassing when he tries to take on starmer..just emphasising how far he is ,out of his depth. Like you said, if they were safe,they would be open. I wonder if that free broadband scheme is still seen as insanity?" Yep kids can't connect to the internet even with a laptop.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So would 4 year olds not go to school and universities have an empty year ?" Or kids move from primary to secondary.... what you quote is why they won’t have the children repeat a year, as a knock on through the system and into the job market | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse." All of the data and studies I have seen all show very clear coralations between schools and universities going back and the rise in covid infections. The evidence is overwhelming. Just look at the govetments own track and track covid incident data as a starting point. This isn't just the UK if you spend some time researching international peer reviewed studies and different countries data then the correlation between schools been open and rising infection rates is the same worldwide. Let's look at the 3 lockdowns in the UK. Lockdown 1 all schools, Universities closed apart from a limited number of key worker children (average 10-20% of loss in school) infections dropped throughout that lockdown and at continuous pace. lockdown 2 it lasted a month and schools / universities remained completely open. London didn't see infections fall at all during the lockdown 2 period and in the weeks after (to allow for lag) in fact they still continued to rise. Now to the current lockdown 3 Schools and universities are closed but this time the term key worker is far far more expansive therefore most schools have around 50% of pupils in. A school near us is at 65% of children attending. Even though a month of this lockdown had yet to pass we have seen infections rates hit a daily high above 60 thousand and then fall bit by bit (at a slower rate than lockdown 1) to now been under 40 thousand daily infections. Do you have any links to hard factual data or peer reviewed studies that show schools been open are not linked to a rise in covid infections? KJ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. All of the data and studies I have seen all show very clear coralations between schools and universities going back and the rise in covid infections. The evidence is overwhelming. Just look at the govetments own track and track covid incident data as a starting point. This isn't just the UK if you spend some time researching international peer reviewed studies and different countries data then the correlation between schools been open and rising infection rates is the same worldwide. Let's look at the 3 lockdowns in the UK. Lockdown 1 all schools, Universities closed apart from a limited number of key worker children (average 10-20% of loss in school) infections dropped throughout that lockdown and at continuous pace. lockdown 2 it lasted a month and schools / universities remained completely open. London didn't see infections fall at all during the lockdown 2 period and in the weeks after (to allow for lag) in fact they still continued to rise. Now to the current lockdown 3 Schools and universities are closed but this time the term key worker is far far more expansive therefore most schools have around 50% of pupils in. A school near us is at 65% of children attending. Even though a month of this lockdown had yet to pass we have seen infections rates hit a daily high above 60 thousand and then fall bit by bit (at a slower rate than lockdown 1) to now been under 40 thousand daily infections. Do you have any links to hard factual data or peer reviewed studies that show schools been open are not linked to a rise in covid infections? KJ " There are plenty of studies to show children aren’t at risk to the virus. There are also plenty of studies that show the infection rate rising doesn’t really mean anything, it’s about the death rate and hospitalisations. Neither of which grew significantly in September. Yes there was a slight rise but that was due to seasonality... there are plenty of studies that show viral infections spread more in the winter. Given the elderly and vulnerable people will be vaccinated by early February I think the schools should definitely be open by then. But also, as this virus isn’t going anywhere and appears to mutate, just like the flu, which will means they will need a new vaccine each year, I think we need to learn to live with this virus, open the schools and get on with life. Kids need their education and I think the schools should never have been closed. Lockdown 99999 close the schools again.... sounds bleak doesn’t it? Well I’m afraid that is the reality of what you are suggesting. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Kids may not suffer severe effects of covid but school staff are catching it from them and kids are taking it home to their families. Our local ITU is full with people in their 30s-50s. I know some people feel school staff are irrelevant but they are people too and have families of their own to consider. A child losing a parent has a devastating effect. Reducing mixing is the only way we can get this under control whilst waiting for mass vaccination. And yes, the elderly and vulnerable may be vaccinated within the next few weeks but the elderly and vulnerable weren’t the ones moving around in large groups, going to schools, pubs, shopping centres etc. Their vaccinations will have little impact upon the safety of the general population. It would have made sense to vaccinate the working generation and uni/secondary school students first maybe. It’s easier for the elderly and vulnerable to shield for an extra month or so. Lou x " A flaw in that plan of yours, under 16s (might be under 18s) aren’t being vaccinated as it hasn’t been approved for that age group. When I see comments like this all that springs to mind is lock up the old & vulnerable, keep kids out of school as I’d like my freedom back to go shopping, socialise with my friends & family..... the old, vulnerable and children would like that too | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Kids may not suffer severe effects of covid but school staff are catching it from them and kids are taking it home to their families. Our local ITU is full with people in their 30s-50s. I know some people feel school staff are irrelevant but they are people too and have families of their own to consider. A child losing a parent has a devastating effect. Reducing mixing is the only way we can get this under control whilst waiting for mass vaccination. And yes, the elderly and vulnerable may be vaccinated within the next few weeks but the elderly and vulnerable weren’t the ones moving around in large groups, going to schools, pubs, shopping centres etc. Their vaccinations will have little impact upon the safety of the general population. It would have made sense to vaccinate the working generation and uni/secondary school students first maybe. It’s easier for the elderly and vulnerable to shield for an extra month or so. Lou x A flaw in that plan of yours, under 16s (might be under 18s) aren’t being vaccinated as it hasn’t been approved for that age group. When I see comments like this all that springs to mind is lock up the old & vulnerable, keep kids out of school as I’d like my freedom back to go shopping, socialise with my friends & family..... the old, vulnerable and children would like that too " It’s not a flawed plan at all the quickest way to open this up would be keyworkers first - the priority isn’t however to open things up it’s to protect the NHS from being overwhelmed. Teens catch and spread but they as a rule don’t get as ill as adults. Teachers however are exposed to hundreds of kids daily with no sd or masks (definitely in primary) so the logic of those that can shield should shield ie the elderly that don’t work is certainly a view that could be taken if we want to open up quickly. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The one thing we're struggling with regarding them going back to school is the fact that our eldest moves to high school in September. If they don't go back for a long enough period of time before the summer holidays then we're worried what problems this may cause to him and others in that situation.all well and good the government saying they'll support children who have missed out on x amount of learning during the pandemic but you can't learn them their primary school work once they hit high school " The last year of primary is consolidating their learning and preparing for SATS which aren’t happening. Most things in year 6 are all about transition ... residential, prom etc etc etc. Not much learning happens past Christmas tbh. They won’t miss anything as High school does their own assessments anyway. I’ve twins in year 6 and am a teacher I really wouldn’t worry about kids our kids age for me it’s more the older ones. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We think perhaps the best way is to just write this whole year off then children start the whole academic year again in September. It's not fair we know but nothing is fair in this shit storm." Can’t do that as there is a whole raft of four year olds waiting to start wheee would they go in no one moves up? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Kids may not suffer severe effects of covid but school staff are catching it from them and kids are taking it home to their families. Our local ITU is full with people in their 30s-50s. I know some people feel school staff are irrelevant but they are people too and have families of their own to consider. A child losing a parent has a devastating effect. Reducing mixing is the only way we can get this under control whilst waiting for mass vaccination. And yes, the elderly and vulnerable may be vaccinated within the next few weeks but the elderly and vulnerable weren’t the ones moving around in large groups, going to schools, pubs, shopping centres etc. Their vaccinations will have little impact upon the safety of the general population. It would have made sense to vaccinate the working generation and uni/secondary school students first maybe. It’s easier for the elderly and vulnerable to shield for an extra month or so. Lou x A flaw in that plan of yours, under 16s (might be under 18s) aren’t being vaccinated as it hasn’t been approved for that age group. When I see comments like this all that springs to mind is lock up the old & vulnerable, keep kids out of school as I’d like my freedom back to go shopping, socialise with my friends & family..... the old, vulnerable and children would like that too " Not locking them up, keeping them safe for a month or so longer whilst those of working age get vaccinated so the country can try to get back on it’s feet. To vaccinate school staff would help get the children back to school. In general, It’s easier for people who do not work to stay home than it is for employed people. Of course we would all like the chance to see friends and family, not that I’ll have much time to do that as I’m not one of those ladies who shops all day and meets friends for coffee, as you insinuated. I work full time and have done throughout the lockdowns. And as the mother of two teenagers I am fully aware of the impact this has upon their mental health and education. Lou x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The one thing we're struggling with regarding them going back to school is the fact that our eldest moves to high school in September. If they don't go back for a long enough period of time before the summer holidays then we're worried what problems this may cause to him and others in that situation.all well and good the government saying they'll support children who have missed out on x amount of learning during the pandemic but you can't learn them their primary school work once they hit high school The last year of primary is consolidating their learning and preparing for SATS which aren’t happening. Most things in year 6 are all about transition ... residential, prom etc etc etc. Not much learning happens past Christmas tbh. They won’t miss anything as High school does their own assessments anyway. I’ve twins in year 6 and am a teacher I really wouldn’t worry about kids our kids age for me it’s more the older ones. " Fair enough, its our eldest though so of course we're gonna worry. We don't know what to expect he doesn't know what to expect and so on. The transition from primary school to high school has got to be scary for them in the first place never mind after having almost a year out of their normal educational setting. It may be slightly different for you being a teacher and having twins that will be by each others sides going in to that new setting though which is understandable | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Kids may not suffer severe effects of covid but school staff are catching it from them and kids are taking it home to their families. Our local ITU is full with people in their 30s-50s. I know some people feel school staff are irrelevant but they are people too and have families of their own to consider. A child losing a parent has a devastating effect. Reducing mixing is the only way we can get this under control whilst waiting for mass vaccination. And yes, the elderly and vulnerable may be vaccinated within the next few weeks but the elderly and vulnerable weren’t the ones moving around in large groups, going to schools, pubs, shopping centres etc. Their vaccinations will have little impact upon the safety of the general population. It would have made sense to vaccinate the working generation and uni/secondary school students first maybe. It’s easier for the elderly and vulnerable to shield for an extra month or so. Lou x A flaw in that plan of yours, under 16s (might be under 18s) aren’t being vaccinated as it hasn’t been approved for that age group. When I see comments like this all that springs to mind is lock up the old & vulnerable, keep kids out of school as I’d like my freedom back to go shopping, socialise with my friends & family..... the old, vulnerable and children would like that too Not locking them up, keeping them safe for a month or so longer whilst those of working age get vaccinated so the country can try to get back on it’s feet. To vaccinate school staff would help get the children back to school. In general, It’s easier for people who do not work to stay home than it is for employed people. Of course we would all like the chance to see friends and family, not that I’ll have much time to do that as I’m not one of those ladies who shops all day and meets friends for coffee, as you insinuated. I work full time and have done throughout the lockdowns. And as the mother of two teenagers I am fully aware of the impact this has upon their mental health and education. Lou x " It’s not just a month or so longer though is it, as pushing them down the vaccination queue they will have a long wait for the 18-50 to get vaccinated. There unfortunately is no wrong or right way and no one is going to agree on a right way. At the moment we have a vaccination plan, let’s stick to it and just get it done, then we can all get a little bit more freedom / normality back. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"when the schools open, start the year from that point - operate through "normal" summer holiday, short half term in September, followed by an early, slightly extended Christmas break. term commences , with normal breaks, timetable from January to July 2022." So do the teachers not deserve a break, they are working right now | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"when the schools open, start the year from that point - operate through "normal" summer holiday, short half term in September, followed by an early, slightly extended Christmas break. term commences , with normal breaks, timetable from January to July 2022." Where will the funding come from to pay all the teachers through summer? I’m sure millions of supply teachers who haven’t been working will be more than willing to volunteer. State employed teachers however are working and won’t work for free all summer. I don’t foresee Doris forking out for this. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The one thing we're struggling with regarding them going back to school is the fact that our eldest moves to high school in September. If they don't go back for a long enough period of time before the summer holidays then we're worried what problems this may cause to him and others in that situation.all well and good the government saying they'll support children who have missed out on x amount of learning during the pandemic but you can't learn them their primary school work once they hit high school The last year of primary is consolidating their learning and preparing for SATS which aren’t happening. Most things in year 6 are all about transition ... residential, prom etc etc etc. Not much learning happens past Christmas tbh. They won’t miss anything as High school does their own assessments anyway. I’ve twins in year 6 and am a teacher I really wouldn’t worry about kids our kids age for me it’s more the older ones. Fair enough, its our eldest though so of course we're gonna worry. We don't know what to expect he doesn't know what to expect and so on. The transition from primary school to high school has got to be scary for them in the first place never mind after having almost a year out of their normal educational setting. It may be slightly different for you being a teacher and having twins that will be by each others sides going in to that new setting though which is understandable " One of mine is SEN so no not the same school. I think it’s as scary as we make it. They’ve never done it so they don’t know what is ‘normal’ I’m sure by the time the summer arrives they’ll have all their transition stuff as usual tbh but if not then the virtual tours and meet the teacher zooms seemed to work well last year. We I believe as parents set the tone if we bleat on about how much they’ve missed abs how it’s a shame then they will feel it - if we get on and teach them resilience they will be stronger adults. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"when the schools open, start the year from that point - operate through "normal" summer holiday, short half term in September, followed by an early, slightly extended Christmas break. term commences , with normal breaks, timetable from January to July 2022. So do the teachers not deserve a break, they are working right now " It's not an attack, nor is it an opinion that teachers are not working at the moment. It's an idea to try and bridge a very disjointed and disruptive period of schooling. If a huge majority of teachers said "we don't like this idea because we worry when we might have some down time, however how about moving xxxxx" it becomes so much more constructive than simply a flat "no" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"when the schools open, start the year from that point - operate through "normal" summer holiday, short half term in September, followed by an early, slightly extended Christmas break. term commences , with normal breaks, timetable from January to July 2022. Where will the funding come from to pay all the teachers through summer? I’m sure millions of supply teachers who haven’t been working will be more than willing to volunteer. State employed teachers however are working and won’t work for free all summer. I don’t foresee Doris forking out for this. " There are lots of amazing teachers out there who will never receive the thanks they deserve for working throughout the pandemic. There are also a few teachers that simply can't be arsed. Over the last 2 weeks one child has received 1 piece of work a day (out of the 3 hes supposed to get) and another of our children receives work that looks like its been set by a 3 year old. Who knew both hands on a clock were the same size and how am I meant to teach him which hand of a clock means what when a teacher can't draw 2 different sized lines | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"when the schools open, start the year from that point - operate through "normal" summer holiday, short half term in September, followed by an early, slightly extended Christmas break. term commences , with normal breaks, timetable from January to July 2022. Where will the funding come from to pay all the teachers through summer? I’m sure millions of supply teachers who haven’t been working will be more than willing to volunteer. State employed teachers however are working and won’t work for free all summer. I don’t foresee Doris forking out for this. There are lots of amazing teachers out there who will never receive the thanks they deserve for working throughout the pandemic. There are also a few teachers that simply can't be arsed. Over the last 2 weeks one child has received 1 piece of work a day (out of the 3 hes supposed to get) and another of our children receives work that looks like its been set by a 3 year old. Who knew both hands on a clock were the same size and how am I meant to teach him which hand of a clock means what when a teacher can't draw 2 different sized lines " Then that is an issue as it’s a statutory requirement for schools to provide 4 hours learning a day. I know I would be talking to the head if that is all that was provided regardless of the quality of work teachers aren’t paid for school holidays (we get paid during them for work already done for ease of payroll) so for schools to be at capacity in the holidays teachers would need to be paid so that’s a 25% increase in budget for school salaries that has to be found. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"when the schools open, start the year from that point - operate through "normal" summer holiday, short half term in September, followed by an early, slightly extended Christmas break. term commences , with normal breaks, timetable from January to July 2022." Can't do that, we have our ferries to France booked Even if that trip isn't possible we'll try and travel the UK in the motorhome. Our daughter is loving the working from home, and doing really well. Why should she be penalised by having her holiday taken away just so the ones who won't learn can "catch up"? She has been getting up at 0645 every day, walking for 4 miles exercise, starting work at 0830 so she is finished by 2pm. Half her lazy classmates are just getting up then | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can anyone give me a valid reason why we can’t just write this year off as regards schools and reboot from September ie keep all students at the same level as they would have been last September but a year later " Because pre-school children will have to stay at pre-school for longer and there’s no capacity. To stop toddlers going to pre-school could delay their development and parents may not be able to defer work or afford childcare. Teenagers/young adults want to get working ASAP, they don’t want an extra year at school/uni. It will have a knock on effect forever more. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can anyone give me a valid reason why we can’t just write this year off as regards schools and reboot from September ie keep all students at the same level as they would have been last September but a year later " Again, why penalize the diligent and motivated ones? Surely this will demotivate them if they see it pays to be lazy? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can anyone give me a valid reason why we can’t just write this year off as regards schools and reboot from September ie keep all students at the same level as they would have been last September but a year later " What Would happen to the four year olds waiting to start? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"when the schools open, start the year from that point - operate through "normal" summer holiday, short half term in September, followed by an early, slightly extended Christmas break. term commences , with normal breaks, timetable from January to July 2022. So do the teachers not deserve a break, they are working right now It's not an attack, nor is it an opinion that teachers are not working at the moment. It's an idea to try and bridge a very disjointed and disruptive period of schooling. If a huge majority of teachers said "we don't like this idea because we worry when we might have some down time, however how about moving xxxxx" it becomes so much more constructive than simply a flat "no" " Aware of that but when do they get a break or the kids for that matter, schooling hasn’t stopped or was it the intention of the idea to stop schooling now and start again in July ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. All of the data and studies I have seen all show very clear coralations between schools and universities going back and the rise in covid infections. The evidence is overwhelming. Just look at the govetments own track and track covid incident data as a starting point. This isn't just the UK if you spend some time researching international peer reviewed studies and different countries data then the correlation between schools been open and rising infection rates is the same worldwide. Let's look at the 3 lockdowns in the UK. Lockdown 1 all schools, Universities closed apart from a limited number of key worker children (average 10-20% of loss in school) infections dropped throughout that lockdown and at continuous pace. lockdown 2 it lasted a month and schools / universities remained completely open. London didn't see infections fall at all during the lockdown 2 period and in the weeks after (to allow for lag) in fact they still continued to rise. Now to the current lockdown 3 Schools and universities are closed but this time the term key worker is far far more expansive therefore most schools have around 50% of pupils in. A school near us is at 65% of children attending. Even though a month of this lockdown had yet to pass we have seen infections rates hit a daily high above 60 thousand and then fall bit by bit (at a slower rate than lockdown 1) to now been under 40 thousand daily infections. Do you have any links to hard factual data or peer reviewed studies that show schools been open are not linked to a rise in covid infections? KJ There are plenty of studies to show children aren’t at risk to the virus. There are also plenty of studies that show the infection rate rising doesn’t really mean anything, it’s about the death rate and hospitalisations. Neither of which grew significantly in September. Yes there was a slight rise but that was due to seasonality... there are plenty of studies that show viral infections spread more in the winter. Given the elderly and vulnerable people will be vaccinated by early February I think the schools should definitely be open by then. But also, as this virus isn’t going anywhere and appears to mutate, just like the flu, which will means they will need a new vaccine each year, I think we need to learn to live with this virus, open the schools and get on with life. Kids need their education and I think the schools should never have been closed. Lockdown 99999 close the schools again.... sounds bleak doesn’t it? Well I’m afraid that is the reality of what you are suggesting. I'm not suggesting anything just stating facts based on actual hard data. Can you share your sources then please to show schools don't effect transmission of virus. Also yes 99.999...% of children are absolutely fine with covid and in know danger at all. Please don't say I said things I didn't read my post again. I also believe schools been closed is causing terrible damaged that will create a devasting lasting legacy long after covid to children's opportunities and sadly thier mental health. Thankfully in lockdown 3 the reason over half of children are still in school is a, due to more jobs been considered essential but also its because any children deemed venerable in terms of working from home are allowed to go into school. One of my 12 yr old nephews has dealt with lockdowns / covid really badly he has been locked in his bedroom for days on end with the curtains never opening totally withdrawing himself from the world around him. His parents are on furlough but the school so not eligible to send him to school under key workers rule. However the school work closely with the parents and agree him going to school and hhaving the routine that brings is vital to his mental health. Facts are based on countless worldwide studies is schools are a high trammission area for covid. Due in part to the volume of children who can get it without showing symptoms. Fact schools been closed is causing widespread damaged to a huge amount of children. There's children couped up with parents under more stress than normal under each others feet. There's a clear rise in domestic abuse and sadly thousands of children are stuck at home with that. The damage not seeing friends for almost a year, not doing sports, out door activities, missing exams the list is sadly endless. Single adults have support bubbles to there boy friend girlfriend. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to the same. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a who are unable to see their girlfriend / boy friend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian. If they are lucky and live in the same town / estate then they may be able to go on a social distanced walk in the park under exercise. When I was 15 and with my first love those year were precious and you only get them once. I can't even begin to imagine what its like going through those teen years during covid / lockdowns etc. KJ " Do you have a source that shows they do spread the virus and that this isn’t just seasonal fluctuations? It may well be that more kids are in school but unfortunately these children are not being taught the full curriculum as this would result in the other kids falling behind. Regardless it sounds like we agree on the negative impact this has. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. All of the data and studies I have seen all show very clear coralations between schools and universities going back and the rise in covid infections. The evidence is overwhelming. Just look at the govetments own track and track covid incident data as a starting point. This isn't just the UK if you spend some time researching international peer reviewed studies and different countries data then the correlation between schools been open and rising infection rates is the same worldwide. Let's look at the 3 lockdowns in the UK. Lockdown 1 all schools, Universities closed apart from a limited number of key worker children (average 10-20% of loss in school) infections dropped throughout that lockdown and at continuous pace. lockdown 2 it lasted a month and schools / universities remained completely open. London didn't see infections fall at all during the lockdown 2 period and in the weeks after (to allow for lag) in fact they still continued to rise. Now to the current lockdown 3 Schools and universities are closed but this time the term key worker is far far more expansive therefore most schools have around 50% of pupils in. A school near us is at 65% of children attending. Even though a month of this lockdown had yet to pass we have seen infections rates hit a daily high above 60 thousand and then fall bit by bit (at a slower rate than lockdown 1) to now been under 40 thousand daily infections. Do you have any links to hard factual data or peer reviewed studies that show schools been open are not linked to a rise in covid infections? KJ There are plenty of studies to show children aren’t at risk to the virus. There are also plenty of studies that show the infection rate rising doesn’t really mean anything, it’s about the death rate and hospitalisations. Neither of which grew significantly in September. Yes there was a slight rise but that was due to seasonality... there are plenty of studies that show viral infections spread more in the winter. Given the elderly and vulnerable people will be vaccinated by early February I think the schools should definitely be open by then. But also, as this virus isn’t going anywhere and appears to mutate, just like the flu, which will means they will need a new vaccine each year, I think we need to learn to live with this virus, open the schools and get on with life. Kids need their education and I think the schools should never have been closed. Lockdown 99999 close the schools again.... sounds bleak doesn’t it? Well I’m afraid that is the reality of what you are suggesting." I'm not suggesting anything just stating facts based on actual hard data. Can you share your sources then please to show schools don't have much effect in terms of transmission of virus. Some peer reviewed studies on the issue would be great as well as I'd be very keen to read them. Also yes 99.999...% of children are absolutely fine with covid and in no danger health wise at all. Please don't say I said things I didn't read my post again. I also believe schools been closed is causing terrible damaged that will create a devasting lasting legacy long after covid to children's opportunities and sadly to their mental health. Thankfully in lockdown 3 the reason over half of children are still in school is a, due to more jobs been considered essential but also its because any children deemed vulnerable if they have to work from home are allowed to go into school as well. One of my 12 yr old nephews has dealt with the lockdowns / covid really badly. He has been locked in his bedroom for days on end with the curtains never opening totally withdrawing himself from the world around him, its like seeing the person he is slowly disappear bit by bit. His parents are on furlough so are not eligible to send him to school under key workers rule. However the school works closely with the parents and agreed for him to go into school as having the routine that brings is vital to his mental health. Fact (based on countless worldwide studies) is sadly schools are a high trammission area for covid. Due in part to the volume of children who can get it without showing symptoms. Fact schools been closed is causing widespread damaged to a huge amount of children. There's children couped up with parents under more stress than normal under each others feet. There's a clear rise in domestic abuse and sadly thousands of children are stuck at home with that. The damage not seeing friends for almost a year, not doing sports, outdoor activities, missing exams the list is sadly endless. Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). If they are lucky and live in the same town / estate then they may be able to go on a social distanced walk in the park (under exercise). When I was 15 and with my first love those year were precious and you only get to live them once. I can't even begin to imagine what its like going through your teen years during covid / lockdowns. KJ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! " Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. All of the data and studies I have seen all show very clear coralations between schools and universities going back and the rise in covid infections. The evidence is overwhelming. Just look at the govetments own track and track covid incident data as a starting point. This isn't just the UK if you spend some time researching international peer reviewed studies and different countries data then the correlation between schools been open and rising infection rates is the same worldwide. Let's look at the 3 lockdowns in the UK. Lockdown 1 all schools, Universities closed apart from a limited number of key worker children (average 10-20% of loss in school) infections dropped throughout that lockdown and at continuous pace. lockdown 2 it lasted a month and schools / universities remained completely open. London didn't see infections fall at all during the lockdown 2 period and in the weeks after (to allow for lag) in fact they still continued to rise. Now to the current lockdown 3 Schools and universities are closed but this time the term key worker is far far more expansive therefore most schools have around 50% of pupils in. A school near us is at 65% of children attending. Even though a month of this lockdown had yet to pass we have seen infections rates hit a daily high above 60 thousand and then fall bit by bit (at a slower rate than lockdown 1) to now been under 40 thousand daily infections. Do you have any links to hard factual data or peer reviewed studies that show schools been open are not linked to a rise in covid infections? KJ There are plenty of studies to show children aren’t at risk to the virus. There are also plenty of studies that show the infection rate rising doesn’t really mean anything, it’s about the death rate and hospitalisations. Neither of which grew significantly in September. Yes there was a slight rise but that was due to seasonality... there are plenty of studies that show viral infections spread more in the winter. Given the elderly and vulnerable people will be vaccinated by early February I think the schools should definitely be open by then. But also, as this virus isn’t going anywhere and appears to mutate, just like the flu, which will means they will need a new vaccine each year, I think we need to learn to live with this virus, open the schools and get on with life. Kids need their education and I think the schools should never have been closed. Lockdown 99999 close the schools again.... sounds bleak doesn’t it? Well I’m afraid that is the reality of what you are suggesting. I'm not suggesting anything just stating facts based on actual hard data. Can you share your sources then please to show schools don't have much effect in terms of transmission of virus. Some peer reviewed studies on the issue would be great as well as I'd be very keen to read them. Also yes 99.999...% of children are absolutely fine with covid and in no danger health wise at all. Please don't say I said things I didn't read my post again. I also believe schools been closed is causing terrible damaged that will create a devasting lasting legacy long after covid to children's opportunities and sadly to their mental health. Thankfully in lockdown 3 the reason over half of children are still in school is a, due to more jobs been considered essential but also its because any children deemed vulnerable if they have to work from home are allowed to go into school as well. One of my 12 yr old nephews has dealt with the lockdowns / covid really badly. He has been locked in his bedroom for days on end with the curtains never opening totally withdrawing himself from the world around him, its like seeing the person he is slowly disappear bit by bit. His parents are on furlough so are not eligible to send him to school under key workers rule. However the school works closely with the parents and agreed for him to go into school as having the routine that brings is vital to his mental health. Fact (based on countless worldwide studies) is sadly schools are a high trammission area for covid. Due in part to the volume of children who can get it without showing symptoms. Fact schools been closed is causing widespread damaged to a huge amount of children. There's children couped up with parents under more stress than normal under each others feet. There's a clear rise in domestic abuse and sadly thousands of children are stuck at home with that. The damage not seeing friends for almost a year, not doing sports, outdoor activities, missing exams the list is sadly endless. Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). If they are lucky and live in the same town / estate then they may be able to go on a social distanced walk in the park (under exercise). When I was 15 and with my first love those year were precious and you only get to live them once. I can't even begin to imagine what its like going through your teen years during covid / lockdowns. KJ" Good god 15 year olds not seeing boyfriends? Really? Hardly life and death is it? I wasnt allowed to spend much time alone indoors with a boyfriend at that age anyway. It’s hardly essential to life ... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... " I think they already give enough free time, as do support staff. I don’t know many other professions where this is expected. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. All of the data and studies I have seen all show very clear coralations between schools and universities going back and the rise in covid infections. The evidence is overwhelming. Just look at the govetments own track and track covid incident data as a starting point. This isn't just the UK if you spend some time researching international peer reviewed studies and different countries data then the correlation between schools been open and rising infection rates is the same worldwide. Let's look at the 3 lockdowns in the UK. Lockdown 1 all schools, Universities closed apart from a limited number of key worker children (average 10-20% of loss in school) infections dropped throughout that lockdown and at continuous pace. lockdown 2 it lasted a month and schools / universities remained completely open. London didn't see infections fall at all during the lockdown 2 period and in the weeks after (to allow for lag) in fact they still continued to rise. Now to the current lockdown 3 Schools and universities are closed but this time the term key worker is far far more expansive therefore most schools have around 50% of pupils in. A school near us is at 65% of children attending. Even though a month of this lockdown had yet to pass we have seen infections rates hit a daily high above 60 thousand and then fall bit by bit (at a slower rate than lockdown 1) to now been under 40 thousand daily infections. Do you have any links to hard factual data or peer reviewed studies that show schools been open are not linked to a rise in covid infections? KJ There are plenty of studies to show children aren’t at risk to the virus. There are also plenty of studies that show the infection rate rising doesn’t really mean anything, it’s about the death rate and hospitalisations. Neither of which grew significantly in September. Yes there was a slight rise but that was due to seasonality... there are plenty of studies that show viral infections spread more in the winter. Given the elderly and vulnerable people will be vaccinated by early February I think the schools should definitely be open by then. But also, as this virus isn’t going anywhere and appears to mutate, just like the flu, which will means they will need a new vaccine each year, I think we need to learn to live with this virus, open the schools and get on with life. Kids need their education and I think the schools should never have been closed. Lockdown 99999 close the schools again.... sounds bleak doesn’t it? Well I’m afraid that is the reality of what you are suggesting. I'm not suggesting anything just stating facts based on actual hard data. Can you share your sources then please to show schools don't have much effect in terms of transmission of virus. Some peer reviewed studies on the issue would be great as well as I'd be very keen to read them. Also yes 99.999...% of children are absolutely fine with covid and in no danger health wise at all. Please don't say I said things I didn't read my post again. I also believe schools been closed is causing terrible damaged that will create a devasting lasting legacy long after covid to children's opportunities and sadly to their mental health. Thankfully in lockdown 3 the reason over half of children are still in school is a, due to more jobs been considered essential but also its because any children deemed vulnerable if they have to work from home are allowed to go into school as well. One of my 12 yr old nephews has dealt with the lockdowns / covid really badly. He has been locked in his bedroom for days on end with the curtains never opening totally withdrawing himself from the world around him, its like seeing the person he is slowly disappear bit by bit. His parents are on furlough so are not eligible to send him to school under key workers rule. However the school works closely with the parents and agreed for him to go into school as having the routine that brings is vital to his mental health. Fact (based on countless worldwide studies) is sadly schools are a high trammission area for covid. Due in part to the volume of children who can get it without showing symptoms. Fact schools been closed is causing widespread damaged to a huge amount of children. There's children couped up with parents under more stress than normal under each others feet. There's a clear rise in domestic abuse and sadly thousands of children are stuck at home with that. The damage not seeing friends for almost a year, not doing sports, outdoor activities, missing exams the list is sadly endless. Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). If they are lucky and live in the same town / estate then they may be able to go on a social distanced walk in the park (under exercise). When I was 15 and with my first love those year were precious and you only get to live them once. I can't even begin to imagine what its like going through your teen years during covid / lockdowns. KJ" We appear to be going round in circles. Your ‘facts’ are based on ‘hard data’ yet you don’t provide any? Let’s face it there are studies into this on either side... it’s simply a point of view and I think the schools should be open for the reasons previously stated. We shouldn’t get hung up on these studies anyways, nobody really takes any notice. After all there is absolutely no evidence or studies to suggest that masks help prevent the spread of Covid 19, in fact there are studies that shows they don’t but that doesn’t stop everyone wearing masks.. but that’s a whole new debate. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... " I knew someone would say something like that. I agree that they would deserve some sort of extra pay, and no I don't know how schools would fund it!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). " Also spare a thought for young adults who live in house shares and their partner lives in another houseshare. Illegal for them to be intimate. Also a problem for a single parents who unexpectedly have a student living back at home who should be at University, so they can only form a bubble with someone who lives alone. People will inevitably break lockdown rules occasionally because it is not reasonable to ban intimacy indefinitely. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... I think they already give enough free time, as do support staff. I don’t know many other professions where this is expected. " Absolutely!!!! I’ve worked 5 weeks unpaid last academic year... no more. We are slagged down by every idiot and their brother that thinks they know what we do and dare to ask us to justify ourselves. Not a chance I’m giving anything else for free | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). Also spare a thought for young adults who live in house shares and their partner lives in another houseshare. Illegal for them to be intimate. Also a problem for a single parents who unexpectedly have a student living back at home who should be at University, so they can only form a bubble with someone who lives alone. People will inevitably break lockdown rules occasionally because it is not reasonable to ban intimacy indefinitely. " Really? Sex isn’t essential to life it’s ridiculous that people have such little self control! It’s not even a year. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. All of the data and studies I have seen all show very clear coralations between schools and universities going back and the rise in covid infections. The evidence is overwhelming. Just look at the govetments own track and track covid incident data as a starting point. This isn't just the UK if you spend some time researching international peer reviewed studies and different countries data then the correlation between schools been open and rising infection rates is the same worldwide. Let's look at the 3 lockdowns in the UK. Lockdown 1 all schools, Universities closed apart from a limited number of key worker children (average 10-20% of loss in school) infections dropped throughout that lockdown and at continuous pace. lockdown 2 it lasted a month and schools / universities remained completely open. London didn't see infections fall at all during the lockdown 2 period and in the weeks after (to allow for lag) in fact they still continued to rise. Now to the current lockdown 3 Schools and universities are closed but this time the term key worker is far far more expansive therefore most schools have around 50% of pupils in. A school near us is at 65% of children attending. Even though a month of this lockdown had yet to pass we have seen infections rates hit a daily high above 60 thousand and then fall bit by bit (at a slower rate than lockdown 1) to now been under 40 thousand daily infections. Do you have any links to hard factual data or peer reviewed studies that show schools been open are not linked to a rise in covid infections? KJ There are plenty of studies to show children aren’t at risk to the virus. There are also plenty of studies that show the infection rate rising doesn’t really mean anything, it’s about the death rate and hospitalisations. Neither of which grew significantly in September. Yes there was a slight rise but that was due to seasonality... there are plenty of studies that show viral infections spread more in the winter. Given the elderly and vulnerable people will be vaccinated by early February I think the schools should definitely be open by then. But also, as this virus isn’t going anywhere and appears to mutate, just like the flu, which will means they will need a new vaccine each year, I think we need to learn to live with this virus, open the schools and get on with life. Kids need their education and I think the schools should never have been closed. Lockdown 99999 close the schools again.... sounds bleak doesn’t it? Well I’m afraid that is the reality of what you are suggesting. I'm not suggesting anything just stating facts based on actual hard data. Can you share your sources then please to show schools don't have much effect in terms of transmission of virus. Some peer reviewed studies on the issue would be great as well as I'd be very keen to read them. Also yes 99.999...% of children are absolutely fine with covid and in no danger health wise at all. Please don't say I said things I didn't read my post again. I also believe schools been closed is causing terrible damaged that will create a devasting lasting legacy long after covid to children's opportunities and sadly to their mental health. Thankfully in lockdown 3 the reason over half of children are still in school is a, due to more jobs been considered essential but also its because any children deemed vulnerable if they have to work from home are allowed to go into school as well. One of my 12 yr old nephews has dealt with the lockdowns / covid really badly. He has been locked in his bedroom for days on end with the curtains never opening totally withdrawing himself from the world around him, its like seeing the person he is slowly disappear bit by bit. His parents are on furlough so are not eligible to send him to school under key workers rule. However the school works closely with the parents and agreed for him to go into school as having the routine that brings is vital to his mental health. Fact (based on countless worldwide studies) is sadly schools are a high trammission area for covid. Due in part to the volume of children who can get it without showing symptoms. Fact schools been closed is causing widespread damaged to a huge amount of children. There's children couped up with parents under more stress than normal under each others feet. There's a clear rise in domestic abuse and sadly thousands of children are stuck at home with that. The damage not seeing friends for almost a year, not doing sports, outdoor activities, missing exams the list is sadly endless. Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). If they are lucky and live in the same town / estate then they may be able to go on a social distanced walk in the park (under exercise). When I was 15 and with my first love those year were precious and you only get to live them once. I can't even begin to imagine what its like going through your teen years during covid / lockdowns. KJ Good god 15 year olds not seeing boyfriends? Really? Hardly life and death is it? I wasnt allowed to spend much time alone indoors with a boyfriend at that age anyway. It’s hardly essential to life ... " I never said it was essential or life and death in any way shape or form. For someone who is a teacher I would have thought you would be far more empathetic with how this 10 month and counting pandemic has completely and utterly changed / impacted young people (of school age) lives. Its also not a competition there's some serious black catting on this virus form. Just because a 15 year is finding been locked up at home unable to see his girlfriend and friends is having a negative effect on his mental health and wellbeing leading to him withdrawing further and further in no way diminishes anybody elses suffering or circumstances due to the pandemic. KJ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Schools and universities are at the heart of the second wave. Complicated by the fact that our borders are wide open. I live in a very residential area but also next to university residencies. It was the highest number of cases in the city in September/October. They keep pumping out the message distancing, masks and cleaning hands. You have to queue to get Ito shops but we can have a primary school with over 500 kids open with out any of the rules. It’s nonsensical Agree with this 100% plus adding that supermarkets need to do more I went to waitrose thinking it would be fine....no it was rammed with people almost tumbling over each other to get their shopping and it's like it in every supermarket I've been to" Probably because there is literally nowhere else people can legally go. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It isn't about sex. It is holding hands or hugging someone you love. Sharing a meal together. Watching a film snuggled up. Very hard to maintain a relationship when you can only meet outdoors, walking two metres apart. " Exactly this. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... " You wouldn't work for free but are happy to be on fab having debates during school hours? Shouldn't you be focussing on the kids at this time? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Open the schools, I personally think it’s crazy they have closed them in the first place. If we are looking at the infection rate... that means nothing, it’s important to look at the death rate and the hospital admissions, neither of which rose in September by any considerable amount. The first few weeks of January are always the peak times for deaths, possible related to kids visiting grandparents at Christmas but who knows, either way this is a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year, regardless of covid. Children missing out on their education is, for me, the biggest crime of all of this. They were told the schools were not safe to open. And ignored them . That’s because they were safe to open. And what are you basing that on? The fact that kids aren’t at risk and we didn’t see a considerable rise in deaths in September. Kids do get it so the teachers would be at risk. Deaths started moving upward at the end of Sept and Oct so would fit in with infections being caught in September 3 deaths 1st Sept, up to 71 on the 30th Agreed but then the deaths fell in early December, it’s a seasonal fluctuation that happens every year. In my opinion closing the schools makes little or no difference and the harm that closing schools does in the long run, is a lot worse. All of the data and studies I have seen all show very clear coralations between schools and universities going back and the rise in covid infections. The evidence is overwhelming. Just look at the govetments own track and track covid incident data as a starting point. This isn't just the UK if you spend some time researching international peer reviewed studies and different countries data then the correlation between schools been open and rising infection rates is the same worldwide. Let's look at the 3 lockdowns in the UK. Lockdown 1 all schools, Universities closed apart from a limited number of key worker children (average 10-20% of loss in school) infections dropped throughout that lockdown and at continuous pace. lockdown 2 it lasted a month and schools / universities remained completely open. London didn't see infections fall at all during the lockdown 2 period and in the weeks after (to allow for lag) in fact they still continued to rise. Now to the current lockdown 3 Schools and universities are closed but this time the term key worker is far far more expansive therefore most schools have around 50% of pupils in. A school near us is at 65% of children attending. Even though a month of this lockdown had yet to pass we have seen infections rates hit a daily high above 60 thousand and then fall bit by bit (at a slower rate than lockdown 1) to now been under 40 thousand daily infections. Do you have any links to hard factual data or peer reviewed studies that show schools been open are not linked to a rise in covid infections? KJ There are plenty of studies to show children aren’t at risk to the virus. There are also plenty of studies that show the infection rate rising doesn’t really mean anything, it’s about the death rate and hospitalisations. Neither of which grew significantly in September. Yes there was a slight rise but that was due to seasonality... there are plenty of studies that show viral infections spread more in the winter. Given the elderly and vulnerable people will be vaccinated by early February I think the schools should definitely be open by then. But also, as this virus isn’t going anywhere and appears to mutate, just like the flu, which will means they will need a new vaccine each year, I think we need to learn to live with this virus, open the schools and get on with life. Kids need their education and I think the schools should never have been closed. Lockdown 99999 close the schools again.... sounds bleak doesn’t it? Well I’m afraid that is the reality of what you are suggesting. I'm not suggesting anything just stating facts based on actual hard data. Can you share your sources then please to show schools don't have much effect in terms of transmission of virus. Some peer reviewed studies on the issue would be great as well as I'd be very keen to read them. Also yes 99.999...% of children are absolutely fine with covid and in no danger health wise at all. Please don't say I said things I didn't read my post again. I also believe schools been closed is causing terrible damaged that will create a devasting lasting legacy long after covid to children's opportunities and sadly to their mental health. Thankfully in lockdown 3 the reason over half of children are still in school is a, due to more jobs been considered essential but also its because any children deemed vulnerable if they have to work from home are allowed to go into school as well. One of my 12 yr old nephews has dealt with the lockdowns / covid really badly. He has been locked in his bedroom for days on end with the curtains never opening totally withdrawing himself from the world around him, its like seeing the person he is slowly disappear bit by bit. His parents are on furlough so are not eligible to send him to school under key workers rule. However the school works closely with the parents and agreed for him to go into school as having the routine that brings is vital to his mental health. Fact (based on countless worldwide studies) is sadly schools are a high trammission area for covid. Due in part to the volume of children who can get it without showing symptoms. Fact schools been closed is causing widespread damaged to a huge amount of children. There's children couped up with parents under more stress than normal under each others feet. There's a clear rise in domestic abuse and sadly thousands of children are stuck at home with that. The damage not seeing friends for almost a year, not doing sports, outdoor activities, missing exams the list is sadly endless. Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). If they are lucky and live in the same town / estate then they may be able to go on a social distanced walk in the park (under exercise). When I was 15 and with my first love those year were precious and you only get to live them once. I can't even begin to imagine what its like going through your teen years during covid / lockdowns. KJ Good god 15 year olds not seeing boyfriends? Really? Hardly life and death is it? I wasnt allowed to spend much time alone indoors with a boyfriend at that age anyway. It’s hardly essential to life ... I never said it was essential or life and death in any way shape or form. For someone who is a teacher I would have thought you would be far more empathetic with how this 10 month and counting pandemic has completely and utterly changed / impacted young people (of school age) lives. Its also not a competition there's some serious black catting on this virus form. Just because a 15 year is finding been locked up at home unable to see his girlfriend and friends is having a negative effect on his mental health and wellbeing leading to him withdrawing further and further in no way diminishes anybody elses suffering or circumstances due to the pandemic. KJ" Ahh so once again teachers appear to be fair game - this is exactly why I’m so pissed off with the attitude of the public towards my profession. My thoughts are with the families of the 100000 people who have died. Along with the many more thousands whom have long covid, single parents who’s children are in care as they’re in hospital the millions who’ve lost livelihoods and homes. Kids who’ve give. the virus onto and killed grandparents. I’m afraid teenagers going without a snog isn’t even on my radar ..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... You wouldn't work for free but are happy to be on fab having debates during school hours? Shouldn't you be focussing on the kids at this time? " My working hours are none of your fucking business. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... You wouldn't work for free but are happy to be on fab having debates during school hours? Shouldn't you be focussing on the kids at this time? My working hours are none of your fucking business. " I'm glad you don't teach my kids | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... You wouldn't work for free but are happy to be on fab having debates during school hours? Shouldn't you be focussing on the kids at this time? My working hours are none of your fucking business. I'm glad you don't teach my kids Me too considering your attitude towards teachers ... can I ask you how many hours you’ve worked this week? What have you done during them abs why you’re on fab during the work day? No? Invasion of privacy? Yeah though as much " I don't have a bad attitude towards teachers. In fact, I think teachers are doing an amazing job, those that are actually working anyway. How many hours have I worked? Probably more than most. What have I done? Well I've run my business. I can be on fab as and when I want, it's a perk of working for myself. Personally, I think your attitude stinks, swearing at people because you don't agree with them. That's the sole reason I'm glad you don't teach my kids. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"For the thread I work part time ... no conflict of interest here but just an illustration that the public appear to think teachers have less right to a private life an opinions than others. You wouldn’t question a nurse or police officer or a healthcare worker as to why they’re here during the day but teachers? Nah fair game ... " You could've said that in here in the first instance rather than PM me calling me names | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... You wouldn't work for free but are happy to be on fab having debates during school hours? Shouldn't you be focussing on the kids at this time? My working hours are none of your fucking business. I'm glad you don't teach my kids Me too considering your attitude towards teachers ... can I ask you how many hours you’ve worked this week? What have you done during them abs why you’re on fab during the work day? No? Invasion of privacy? Yeah though as much I don't have a bad attitude towards teachers. In fact, I think teachers are doing an amazing job, those that are actually working anyway. How many hours have I worked? Probably more than most. What have I done? Well I've run my business. I can be on fab as and when I want, it's a perk of working for myself. Personally, I think your attitude stinks, swearing at people because you don't agree with them. That's the sole reason I'm glad you don't teach my kids." Teachers ARE allowed to swear you know. Your question wasn’t innocent you were questioning my professionalism and my ‘right’ to be on here during the day - really you don’t think that’s a touch out of order? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"For the thread I work part time ... no conflict of interest here but just an illustration that the public appear to think teachers have less right to a private life an opinions than others. You wouldn’t question a nurse or police officer or a healthcare worker as to why they’re here during the day but teachers? Nah fair game ... You could've said that in here in the first instance rather than PM me calling me names " I pm’d you telling you I was part time ... as it is less public but figured your judgemental attitude should be outed really. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"For the thread I work part time ... no conflict of interest here but just an illustration that the public appear to think teachers have less right to a private life an opinions than others. You wouldn’t question a nurse or police officer or a healthcare worker as to why they’re here during the day but teachers? Nah fair game ... You could've said that in here in the first instance rather than PM me calling me names I pm’d you telling you I was part time ... as it is less public but figured your judgemental attitude should be outed really. " Does that include calling me 'poisonous' and then blocking me? Maybe you took offence at the question, you're on here screaming at people because you think everyone is against teachers. This is an open forum and I'm within my rights to say as I please. If you don't like it, don't engage. For now, by Karen | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"For the thread I work part time ... no conflict of interest here but just an illustration that the public appear to think teachers have less right to a private life an opinions than others. You wouldn’t question a nurse or police officer or a healthcare worker as to why they’re here during the day but teachers? Nah fair game ... You could've said that in here in the first instance rather than PM me calling me names I pm’d you telling you I was part time ... as it is less public but figured your judgemental attitude should be outed really. Does that include calling me 'poisonous' and then blocking me? Maybe you took offence at the question, you're on here screaming at people because you think everyone is against teachers. This is an open forum and I'm within my rights to say as I please. If you don't like it, don't engage. For now, by Karen " *bye If I don’t like it I won’t ignore someone questioning my professionalism why should I? You’re wrong so I am perfectly within my rights to point out why you’re wrong. Illustrating why you think my life is open to your scrutiny just because I’m a teacher .. you have perfectly illustrated the frustration many in my profession feel - so for that cheers | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There has to be a better way of reintroducing kids to education. It's obvious that home schooling is leaving some kids behind whilst it's also obvious that schools don't have the physical capacity to reopen in the same way as before covid. I think you're right and I don't really have an answer as to what can be done. It was sad to see a FB post the other day with a parent saying they had given up with home schooling (too much aggravation) and was over the moon their child had so many followers on tick tock & thought this was a great way to spend their days. These children will sadly be left way behind (not suggesting they were ever in the top sets/classes, but tick tock isn't a substitute for education)" Typical example of some parenting skills of the current generation. Maybe they are hoping to make a living as a Tick-Tock influencer? lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... I knew someone would say something like that. I agree that they would deserve some sort of extra pay, and no I don't know how schools would fund it!! " I think the point is you're looking for solution s rather than the default position of some on here which is... If it cnat be the way its always been. Then we have to stop, no we can't make any chat changes, and it's one in all in. I think it's a great idea and I think schools and parentsbshould be encouraged to do what works for their kids. Trying to find a solution that works exactly the same for all school kids in the country is doomed to failure. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... I knew someone would say something like that. I agree that they would deserve some sort of extra pay, and no I don't know how schools would fund it!! I think the point is you're looking for solution s rather than the default position of some on here which is... If it cnat be the way its always been. Then we have to stop, no we can't make any chat changes, and it's one in all in. I think it's a great idea and I think schools and parentsbshould be encouraged to do what works for their kids. Trying to find a solution that works exactly the same for all school kids in the country is doomed to failure. " You know that is what is going to be though, one solution for all. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... I knew someone would say something like that. I agree that they would deserve some sort of extra pay, and no I don't know how schools would fund it!! I think the point is you're looking for solution s rather than the default position of some on here which is... If it cnat be the way its always been. Then we have to stop, no we can't make any chat changes, and it's one in all in. I think it's a great idea and I think schools and parentsbshould be encouraged to do what works for their kids. Trying to find a solution that works exactly the same for all school kids in the country is doomed to failure. " I totally agree with this I also think that this is the perfect time to ‘rewrite the book’ ... the worry about catching up. Catching up to what? Why not re assess what we need now as far as education goes not flog the kids to death over the summer so they meet this standard .... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). Also spare a thought for young adults who live in house shares and their partner lives in another houseshare. Illegal for them to be intimate. Also a problem for a single parents who unexpectedly have a student living back at home who should be at University, so they can only form a bubble with someone who lives alone. People will inevitably break lockdown rules occasionally because it is not reasonable to ban intimacy indefinitely. Really? Sex isn’t essential to life it’s ridiculous that people have such little self control! It’s not even a year. " It's ridiculous that someone who teaches kids isn't more aware of their emotional needs. You can't just choose to tell 16 17 18 year olds and by the way uni students too that their emotions and relationships are not significant or valid or important to them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... I knew someone would say something like that. I agree that they would deserve some sort of extra pay, and no I don't know how schools would fund it!! I think the point is you're looking for solution s rather than the default position of some on here which is... If it cnat be the way its always been. Then we have to stop, no we can't make any chat changes, and it's one in all in. I think it's a great idea and I think schools and parentsbshould be encouraged to do what works for their kids. Trying to find a solution that works exactly the same for all school kids in the country is doomed to failure. You know that is what is going to be though, one solution for all. " Shoving them all in a little box - so wrong | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). Also spare a thought for young adults who live in house shares and their partner lives in another houseshare. Illegal for them to be intimate. Also a problem for a single parents who unexpectedly have a student living back at home who should be at University, so they can only form a bubble with someone who lives alone. People will inevitably break lockdown rules occasionally because it is not reasonable to ban intimacy indefinitely. Really? Sex isn’t essential to life it’s ridiculous that people have such little self control! It’s not even a year. It's ridiculous that someone who teaches kids isn't more aware of their emotional needs. You can't just choose to tell 16 17 18 year olds and by the way uni students too that their emotions and relationships are not significant or valid or important to them. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). Also spare a thought for young adults who live in house shares and their partner lives in another houseshare. Illegal for them to be intimate. Also a problem for a single parents who unexpectedly have a student living back at home who should be at University, so they can only form a bubble with someone who lives alone. People will inevitably break lockdown rules occasionally because it is not reasonable to ban intimacy indefinitely. Really? Sex isn’t essential to life it’s ridiculous that people have such little self control! It’s not even a year. It's ridiculous that someone who teaches kids isn't more aware of their emotional needs. You can't just choose to tell 16 17 18 year olds and by the way uni students too that their emotions and relationships are not significant or valid or important to them. " We were talking 15 year olds .... I didn’t say they weren’t important just not so important as many other things. It’s not a reason to open schools or remove lock down. I also didn’t say they weren’t valid emotions - not once. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... I knew someone would say something like that. I agree that they would deserve some sort of extra pay, and no I don't know how schools would fund it!! I think the point is you're looking for solution s rather than the default position of some on here which is... If it cnat be the way its always been. Then we have to stop, no we can't make any chat changes, and it's one in all in. I think it's a great idea and I think schools and parentsbshould be encouraged to do what works for their kids. Trying to find a solution that works exactly the same for all school kids in the country is doomed to failure. I totally agree with this I also think that this is the perfect time to ‘rewrite the book’ ... the worry about catching up. Catching up to what? Why not re assess what we need now as far as education goes not flog the kids to death over the summer so they meet this standard .... " On that we agree. Not suggesting that all kids have the drive, fortune or energy to be bill Gates or Larry Ellison but many very successful business folk have not had a "traditional" journey through education. Trouble is, whatever the answer is, homeschooling for all from 4 to 23 is not the answer. And teacher should be careful what they wish for as if the solution now is education via YouTube, maybe it will be tomorrow too. There is no one solution. Creativity and flexibility are required. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). Also spare a thought for young adults who live in house shares and their partner lives in another houseshare. Illegal for them to be intimate. Also a problem for a single parents who unexpectedly have a student living back at home who should be at University, so they can only form a bubble with someone who lives alone. People will inevitably break lockdown rules occasionally because it is not reasonable to ban intimacy indefinitely. Really? Sex isn’t essential to life it’s ridiculous that people have such little self control! It’s not even a year. It's ridiculous that someone who teaches kids isn't more aware of their emotional needs. You can't just choose to tell 16 17 18 year olds and by the way uni students too that their emotions and relationships are not significant or valid or important to them. We were talking 15 year olds .... I didn’t say they weren’t important just not so important as many other things. It’s not a reason to open schools or remove lock down. I also didn’t say they weren’t valid emotions - not once. " I think we have different opinions on the priorities which is fine . Right now above all things, I'm concerned about the emotional well being of my kids. The academic stuff can come if it comes. But we have some very troubled kids. Especially those in exam years and uni years. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). Also spare a thought for young adults who live in house shares and their partner lives in another houseshare. Illegal for them to be intimate. Also a problem for a single parents who unexpectedly have a student living back at home who should be at University, so they can only form a bubble with someone who lives alone. People will inevitably break lockdown rules occasionally because it is not reasonable to ban intimacy indefinitely. Really? Sex isn’t essential to life it’s ridiculous that people have such little self control! It’s not even a year. It's ridiculous that someone who teaches kids isn't more aware of their emotional needs. You can't just choose to tell 16 17 18 year olds and by the way uni students too that their emotions and relationships are not significant or valid or important to them. We were talking 15 year olds .... I didn’t say they weren’t important just not so important as many other things. It’s not a reason to open schools or remove lock down. I also didn’t say they weren’t valid emotions - not once. I think we have different opinions on the priorities which is fine . Right now above all things, I'm concerned about the emotional well being of my kids. The academic stuff can come if it comes. But we have some very troubled kids. Especially those in exam years and uni years. " I agree - my life is all about the little ones. We can only focus as one person I believe in one crisis at a time - I’m not a witch I’m scared and coming across as defensive x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's his name Van Tam said in the press conference the other night that while children can get it it's usually mild. Mixing is the problem, kids picking it up and transmitting it to other family members. They were going to do lateral testing which would of helped but I believe they've decided against it now. Probably due to lack of staff being able to do the tests? I'd be happy for mine to do half a summer school. I've got teacher friends, some are all for this, some aren't. Those ones always do a countdown to when their next school holiday is! Your teacher friends are happy to work for free? Wow I wouldn’t ... I knew someone would say something like that. I agree that they would deserve some sort of extra pay, and no I don't know how schools would fund it!! I think the point is you're looking for solution s rather than the default position of some on here which is... If it cnat be the way its always been. Then we have to stop, no we can't make any chat changes, and it's one in all in. I think it's a great idea and I think schools and parentsbshould be encouraged to do what works for their kids. Trying to find a solution that works exactly the same for all school kids in the country is doomed to failure. I totally agree with this I also think that this is the perfect time to ‘rewrite the book’ ... the worry about catching up. Catching up to what? Why not re assess what we need now as far as education goes not flog the kids to death over the summer so they meet this standard .... On that we agree. Not suggesting that all kids have the drive, fortune or energy to be bill Gates or Larry Ellison but many very successful business folk have not had a "traditional" journey through education. Trouble is, whatever the answer is, homeschooling for all from 4 to 23 is not the answer. And teacher should be careful what they wish for as if the solution now is education via YouTube, maybe it will be tomorrow too. There is no one solution. Creativity and flexibility are required." I totally agree... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" One of my 12 yr old nephews has dealt with the lockdowns / covid really badly. He has been locked in his bedroom for days on end with the curtains never opening totally withdrawing himself from the world around him, its like seeing the person he is slowly disappear bit by bit. His parents are on furlough so are not eligible to send him to school under key workers rule. However the school works closely with the parents and agreed for him to go into school as having the routine that brings is vital to his mental health. Fact (based on countless worldwide studies) is sadly schools are a high trammission area for covid. Due in part to the volume of children who can get it without showing symptoms. Fact schools been closed is causing widespread damaged to a huge amount of children. There's children couped up with parents under more stress than normal under each others feet. There's a clear rise in domestic abuse and sadly thousands of children are stuck at home with that. The damage not seeing friends for almost a year, not doing sports, outdoor activities, missing exams the list is sadly endless. Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). If they are lucky and live in the same town / estate then they may be able to go on a social distanced walk in the park (under exercise). When I was 15 and with my first love those year were precious and you only get to live them once. I can't even begin to imagine what its like going through your teen years during covid / lockdowns. KJ Good god 15 year olds not seeing boyfriends? Really? Hardly life and death is it? I wasnt allowed to spend much time alone indoors with a boyfriend at that age anyway. It’s hardly essential to life ... I never said it was essential or life and death in any way shape or form. For someone who is a teacher I would have thought you would be far more empathetic with how this 10 month and counting pandemic has completely and utterly changed / impacted young people (of school age) lives. Its also not a competition there's some serious black catting on this virus form. Just because a 15 year is finding been locked up at home unable to see his girlfriend and friends is having a negative effect on his mental health and wellbeing leading to him withdrawing further and further in no way diminishes anybody elses suffering or circumstances due to the pandemic. KJ Ahh so once again teachers appear to be fair game - this is exactly why I’m so pissed off with the attitude of the public towards my profession. My thoughts are with the families of the 100000 people who have died. Along with the many more thousands whom have long covid, single parents who’s children are in care as they’re in hospital the millions who’ve lost livelihoods and homes. Kids who’ve give. the virus onto and killed grandparents. I’m afraid teenagers going without a snog isn’t even on my radar ..... " It's not about teachers been fair game at all I simply said I thought you would have more empathy for the challenges facing school age children nothing more. Do I think teachers should be a top the top of queue for the vaccine alongside NHS workers YES. Do I think Teachers are been stretched to the limit trying to teach the 50% of kids (approx) in school classrooms currently whilst also trying to provide work / support for the other 50‰ (approx) of life that are trying to do school from home. YES. Do I think the media and therefore certain sections of society are unfairly picking at and bashing the Teacher sector and Teachers specifically? YES and its goodam shameful. Do I think one persons extreme suffering means anothers person's less extreme suffering is not valid or worthy ABSOLUTELY NOT. Would I expect a teacher to be more empathetic and understanding to how pre covid a teenager can go through a difficult time during his teen years. Add to this 10 month plus pandemic on top of that and all it entails then. YES It may not be life or death but when a 5 year screams in horror because his uncle got to close (in the park before full lockdown). When asked what was wrong it was because he doesn't want to be responsible for killing his Grandma. A child who a year ago loved hugs and physical contact now sees such things as potentially deadly to his loved ones. Regardless of it been needed or not I think its tragic that young children have been conditioned like that during the pandemic. Regarding the 15 year teenager yes they may still have their physical health and their lives so are not on your Radar but I've seen a number of children in my personal and professional life who are now just a shell of a person compared to pre covid and I find that very very sad to see. I'm so glad our first child is only 2 1/2 months old and will hopefully not remember or be impacted by last year and everything still to come. My heart goes out to parents whose children are suffering during these times. KJ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" One of my 12 yr old nephews has dealt with the lockdowns / covid really badly. He has been locked in his bedroom for days on end with the curtains never opening totally withdrawing himself from the world around him, its like seeing the person he is slowly disappear bit by bit. His parents are on furlough so are not eligible to send him to school under key workers rule. However the school works closely with the parents and agreed for him to go into school as having the routine that brings is vital to his mental health. Fact (based on countless worldwide studies) is sadly schools are a high trammission area for covid. Due in part to the volume of children who can get it without showing symptoms. Fact schools been closed is causing widespread damaged to a huge amount of children. There's children couped up with parents under more stress than normal under each others feet. There's a clear rise in domestic abuse and sadly thousands of children are stuck at home with that. The damage not seeing friends for almost a year, not doing sports, outdoor activities, missing exams the list is sadly endless. Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). If they are lucky and live in the same town / estate then they may be able to go on a social distanced walk in the park (under exercise). When I was 15 and with my first love those year were precious and you only get to live them once. I can't even begin to imagine what its like going through your teen years during covid / lockdowns. KJ Good god 15 year olds not seeing boyfriends? Really? Hardly life and death is it? I wasnt allowed to spend much time alone indoors with a boyfriend at that age anyway. It’s hardly essential to life ... I never said it was essential or life and death in any way shape or form. For someone who is a teacher I would have thought you would be far more empathetic with how this 10 month and counting pandemic has completely and utterly changed / impacted young people (of school age) lives. Its also not a competition there's some serious black catting on this virus form. Just because a 15 year is finding been locked up at home unable to see his girlfriend and friends is having a negative effect on his mental health and wellbeing leading to him withdrawing further and further in no way diminishes anybody elses suffering or circumstances due to the pandemic. KJ Ahh so once again teachers appear to be fair game - this is exactly why I’m so pissed off with the attitude of the public towards my profession. My thoughts are with the families of the 100000 people who have died. Along with the many more thousands whom have long covid, single parents who’s children are in care as they’re in hospital the millions who’ve lost livelihoods and homes. Kids who’ve give. the virus onto and killed grandparents. I’m afraid teenagers going without a snog isn’t even on my radar ..... It's not about teachers been fair game at all I simply said I thought you would have more empathy for the challenges facing school age children nothing more. Do I think teachers should be a top the top of queue for the vaccine alongside NHS workers YES. Do I think Teachers are been stretched to the limit trying to teach the 50% of kids (approx) in school classrooms currently whilst also trying to provide work / support for the other 50‰ (approx) of life that are trying to do school from home. YES. Do I think the media and therefore certain sections of society are unfairly picking at and bashing the Teacher sector and Teachers specifically? YES and its goodam shameful. Do I think one persons extreme suffering means anothers person's less extreme suffering is not valid or worthy ABSOLUTELY NOT. Would I expect a teacher to be more empathetic and understanding to how pre covid a teenager can go through a difficult time during his teen years. Add to this 10 month plus pandemic on top of that and all it entails then. YES It may not be life or death but when a 5 year screams in horror because his uncle got to close (in the park before full lockdown). When asked what was wrong it was because he doesn't want to be responsible for killing his Grandma. A child who a year ago loved hugs and physical contact now sees such things as potentially deadly to his loved ones. Regardless of it been needed or not I think its tragic that young children have been conditioned like that during the pandemic. Regarding the 15 year teenager yes they may still have their physical health and their lives so are not on your Radar but I've seen a number of children in my personal and professional life who are now just a shell of a person compared to pre covid and I find that very very sad to see. I'm so glad our first child is only 2 1/2 months old and will hopefully not remember or be impacted by last year and everything still to come. My heart goes out to parents whose children are suffering during these times. KJ" Appreciate the explanation - I don’t teach teenagers nor am I trained to so my opinion is based on me as a person which I stand by. Should I ever wish to teach teenagers I will need to retrain and my knowledge and opinion may change but as I said not on my radar personally or professionally atm. Like a gynaecologist won’t have skin growths on their radar I guess .... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" One of my 12 yr old nephews has dealt with the lockdowns / covid really badly. He has been locked in his bedroom for days on end with the curtains never opening totally withdrawing himself from the world around him, its like seeing the person he is slowly disappear bit by bit. His parents are on furlough so are not eligible to send him to school under key workers rule. However the school works closely with the parents and agreed for him to go into school as having the routine that brings is vital to his mental health. Fact (based on countless worldwide studies) is sadly schools are a high trammission area for covid. Due in part to the volume of children who can get it without showing symptoms. Fact schools been closed is causing widespread damaged to a huge amount of children. There's children couped up with parents under more stress than normal under each others feet. There's a clear rise in domestic abuse and sadly thousands of children are stuck at home with that. The damage not seeing friends for almost a year, not doing sports, outdoor activities, missing exams the list is sadly endless. Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). If they are lucky and live in the same town / estate then they may be able to go on a social distanced walk in the park (under exercise). When I was 15 and with my first love those year were precious and you only get to live them once. I can't even begin to imagine what its like going through your teen years during covid / lockdowns. KJ Good god 15 year olds not seeing boyfriends? Really? Hardly life and death is it? I wasnt allowed to spend much time alone indoors with a boyfriend at that age anyway. It’s hardly essential to life ... I never said it was essential or life and death in any way shape or form. For someone who is a teacher I would have thought you would be far more empathetic with how this 10 month and counting pandemic has completely and utterly changed / impacted young people (of school age) lives. Its also not a competition there's some serious black catting on this virus form. Just because a 15 year is finding been locked up at home unable to see his girlfriend and friends is having a negative effect on his mental health and wellbeing leading to him withdrawing further and further in no way diminishes anybody elses suffering or circumstances due to the pandemic. KJ Ahh so once again teachers appear to be fair game - this is exactly why I’m so pissed off with the attitude of the public towards my profession. My thoughts are with the families of the 100000 people who have died. Along with the many more thousands whom have long covid, single parents who’s children are in care as they’re in hospital the millions who’ve lost livelihoods and homes. Kids who’ve give. the virus onto and killed grandparents. I’m afraid teenagers going without a snog isn’t even on my radar ..... It's not about teachers been fair game at all I simply said I thought you would have more empathy for the challenges facing school age children nothing more. Do I think teachers should be a top the top of queue for the vaccine alongside NHS workers YES. Do I think Teachers are been stretched to the limit trying to teach the 50% of kids (approx) in school classrooms currently whilst also trying to provide work / support for the other 50‰ (approx) of life that are trying to do school from home. YES. Do I think the media and therefore certain sections of society are unfairly picking at and bashing the Teacher sector and Teachers specifically? YES and its goodam shameful. Do I think one persons extreme suffering means anothers person's less extreme suffering is not valid or worthy ABSOLUTELY NOT. Would I expect a teacher to be more empathetic and understanding to how pre covid a teenager can go through a difficult time during his teen years. Add to this 10 month plus pandemic on top of that and all it entails then. YES It may not be life or death but when a 5 year screams in horror because his uncle got to close (in the park before full lockdown). When asked what was wrong it was because he doesn't want to be responsible for killing his Grandma. A child who a year ago loved hugs and physical contact now sees such things as potentially deadly to his loved ones. Regardless of it been needed or not I think its tragic that young children have been conditioned like that during the pandemic. Regarding the 15 year teenager yes they may still have their physical health and their lives so are not on your Radar but I've seen a number of children in my personal and professional life who are now just a shell of a person compared to pre covid and I find that very very sad to see. I'm so glad our first child is only 2 1/2 months old and will hopefully not remember or be impacted by last year and everything still to come. My heart goes out to parents whose children are suffering during these times. KJ Appreciate the explanation - I don’t teach teenagers nor am I trained to so my opinion is based on me as a person which I stand by. Should I ever wish to teach teenagers I will need to retrain and my knowledge and opinion may change but as I said not on my radar personally or professionally atm. Like a gynaecologist won’t have skin growths on their radar I guess .... " No problem one of my best friends is a teacher for Year 8's so I've heard first hand all of the challenges they have faced. They do an incredible job under difficult circumstances. I can totally understand the anger been a teacher as you have been wrongly attacked by the media and the public (including on fab forums). After a while will it would put anybody in a defensive position. This pandemic has impacted everyone on the planet in some way, shape or form sadly. Even our baby is missing out on the things we planned. He was booked in to start water baby classes at the gym but they are closed. He was also due to start a parent and child music group in a few weeks once he is 3 months but alas things like that aren't possible (understandably). Apparently they are still doing the baby music group online although I'm not sure how good 3 months + babies are going to be on Zoom / Teams sessions mind lol. KJ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" One of my 12 yr old nephews has dealt with the lockdowns / covid really badly. He has been locked in his bedroom for days on end with the curtains never opening totally withdrawing himself from the world around him, its like seeing the person he is slowly disappear bit by bit. His parents are on furlough so are not eligible to send him to school under key workers rule. However the school works closely with the parents and agreed for him to go into school as having the routine that brings is vital to his mental health. Fact (based on countless worldwide studies) is sadly schools are a high trammission area for covid. Due in part to the volume of children who can get it without showing symptoms. Fact schools been closed is causing widespread damaged to a huge amount of children. There's children couped up with parents under more stress than normal under each others feet. There's a clear rise in domestic abuse and sadly thousands of children are stuck at home with that. The damage not seeing friends for almost a year, not doing sports, outdoor activities, missing exams the list is sadly endless. Single adults have support bubbles to go see there boy friend girlfriend, be intimate, cuddle stay overnight etc. Sadly teens are overlooked when it comes to their relationships. Let's spare a thought for the teenagers who obviously still live with a parent / parents / guardian are unable to see / cuddle, kiss etc their girlfriend / boyfriend (who also lives with their own parent / parents / guardian). If they are lucky and live in the same town / estate then they may be able to go on a social distanced walk in the park (under exercise). When I was 15 and with my first love those year were precious and you only get to live them once. I can't even begin to imagine what its like going through your teen years during covid / lockdowns. KJ Good god 15 year olds not seeing boyfriends? Really? Hardly life and death is it? I wasnt allowed to spend much time alone indoors with a boyfriend at that age anyway. It’s hardly essential to life ... I never said it was essential or life and death in any way shape or form. For someone who is a teacher I would have thought you would be far more empathetic with how this 10 month and counting pandemic has completely and utterly changed / impacted young people (of school age) lives. Its also not a competition there's some serious black catting on this virus form. Just because a 15 year is finding been locked up at home unable to see his girlfriend and friends is having a negative effect on his mental health and wellbeing leading to him withdrawing further and further in no way diminishes anybody elses suffering or circumstances due to the pandemic. KJ Ahh so once again teachers appear to be fair game - this is exactly why I’m so pissed off with the attitude of the public towards my profession. My thoughts are with the families of the 100000 people who have died. Along with the many more thousands whom have long covid, single parents who’s children are in care as they’re in hospital the millions who’ve lost livelihoods and homes. Kids who’ve give. the virus onto and killed grandparents. I’m afraid teenagers going without a snog isn’t even on my radar ..... It's not about teachers been fair game at all I simply said I thought you would have more empathy for the challenges facing school age children nothing more. Do I think teachers should be a top the top of queue for the vaccine alongside NHS workers YES. Do I think Teachers are been stretched to the limit trying to teach the 50% of kids (approx) in school classrooms currently whilst also trying to provide work / support for the other 50‰ (approx) of life that are trying to do school from home. YES. Do I think the media and therefore certain sections of society are unfairly picking at and bashing the Teacher sector and Teachers specifically? YES and its goodam shameful. Do I think one persons extreme suffering means anothers person's less extreme suffering is not valid or worthy ABSOLUTELY NOT. Would I expect a teacher to be more empathetic and understanding to how pre covid a teenager can go through a difficult time during his teen years. Add to this 10 month plus pandemic on top of that and all it entails then. YES It may not be life or death but when a 5 year screams in horror because his uncle got to close (in the park before full lockdown). When asked what was wrong it was because he doesn't want to be responsible for killing his Grandma. A child who a year ago loved hugs and physical contact now sees such things as potentially deadly to his loved ones. Regardless of it been needed or not I think its tragic that young children have been conditioned like that during the pandemic. Regarding the 15 year teenager yes they may still have their physical health and their lives so are not on your Radar but I've seen a number of children in my personal and professional life who are now just a shell of a person compared to pre covid and I find that very very sad to see. I'm so glad our first child is only 2 1/2 months old and will hopefully not remember or be impacted by last year and everything still to come. My heart goes out to parents whose children are suffering during these times. KJ Appreciate the explanation - I don’t teach teenagers nor am I trained to so my opinion is based on me as a person which I stand by. Should I ever wish to teach teenagers I will need to retrain and my knowledge and opinion may change but as I said not on my radar personally or professionally atm. Like a gynaecologist won’t have skin growths on their radar I guess .... No problem one of my best friends is a teacher for Year 8's so I've heard first hand all of the challenges they have faced. They do an incredible job under difficult circumstances. I can totally understand the anger been a teacher as you have been wrongly attacked by the media and the public (including on fab forums). After a while will it would put anybody in a defensive position. This pandemic has impacted everyone on the planet in some way, shape or form sadly. Even our baby is missing out on the things we planned. He was booked in to start water baby classes at the gym but they are closed. He was also due to start a parent and child music group in a few weeks once he is 3 months but alas things like that aren't possible (understandably). Apparently they are still doing the baby music group online although I'm not sure how good 3 months + babies are going to be on Zoom / Teams sessions mind lol. KJ" Ha baby zoom! I can’t imagine that it’s bad enough with 7 year olds lol Just all such a shit show I don’t know who to feel more sorry for . My heart breaks for the kids that don’t understand and for my mum that hasn’t touched another human being for almost a year. Just seems like a bad film. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On the 6 o'clock news on Monday, headline item had a parent from Bromley who said that schools there had given notice that they were no longer going to provide any online learning. 20 minutes in, another item on schooling, a parent from Cambridge said his son has no lessons after 12 midday. Some of our employees are telling us that their kids have less than 15 minutes tuition a day. Which begs the question, what exactly are the teachers doing then? More than 50% of pupils are in school due to the relaxation of the critical worker list by the government this means most teachers if not all are actually teaching as class sizes are being kept to 15 again - who exactly do you expect to teach the 50% at home? Here is what I have done Planned lessons for in school kids and home kids Marked work from in school kids from last week Called all the home kids Recorded 10 lessons for the at home kids Replied to 127 emails from parents moaning that their kids are hard work Replied to 89 emails from kids that are a delight abs telling me how they miss me Sorted the classroom out multiple times a day cleaning etc (not enough money to pay cleaners for multiple daily cleaning) Oh and taught a class of 18 keyworker children all week " i want to start by clarifying this is not a dig or disbelief of what you are doing daily / weekly just an example of the variance from school to school one of my friends is a primary school teacher... they don’t have anywhere near 50% in so she is not required on site , hers is one of the schools where classes are lumped together and basically babysat she records 3 lessons per week for her students and sets them work to do off the back of it ... for most of them the engagement level is no higher than 5 kids logging on the calls to kids that dont attend are performed by pastoral care (i guess pastoral care exists for them because its a more disadvantaged area) she has acknowledged herself she is getting demotivated and lazy because her working day is nothing like it was before when she would be in class at 7am preparing for the day i think the problem is the experience varies hugely from district to district and even school to school and while some are doing everything they can for the kids in other areas kids are being left behind and thats not all on the school as even the materials being produced are not being used ... people (both parents and teachers) are assuming their experience is standard across all and getting frustrated at the the other person who legitimately have complaints to make | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |