FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Virus

Spanish anti vaxxer registry.

Jump to newest
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley

Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire

It would add more value if it had 'refused' and 'medical grounds' as differentiators perhaps..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ap d agde coupleCouple
over a year ago

Broadstairs

Definitely not must be against Human rights

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It would add more value if it had 'refused' and 'medical grounds' as differentiators perhaps.."

Yeah, along with 'idiot'. Ha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"Definitely not must be against Human rights "

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ap d agde coupleCouple
over a year ago

Broadstairs


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. "

And you believe they won’t share it ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

Until they confirm they have the intention of actually offering the vaccine to all, this is a bit of a mute topic.

Just on the Spanish list, assuming this is just those that choose not to rather than those that can’t have it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ? "

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

That will get some knickers in a twist.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire


"It would add more value if it had 'refused' and 'medical grounds' as differentiators perhaps..

Yeah, along with 'idiot'. Ha"

I was trying to be nice...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"That will get some knickers in a twist.

"

I think everyone knows, it's going to be hard to travel if you don't accept the vaccine

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ap d agde coupleCouple
over a year ago

Broadstairs


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. "

And there is never ever any data leaks ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. And there is never ever any data leaks ? "

Who knows?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. "

Not us then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that.

Not us then "

I don't know if the uk will follow. It might have to, just to make travel possible to the EU.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I wouldn't worry. The chances of dying in a plane crash is 1 in 11 million can't see any anti-vaxers taking that risk anyway.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that

Not us then

I don't know if the uk will follow. It might have to, just to make travel possible to the EU. "

I meant them sharing it with us, we aren’t in the EU. As for us, as per my post above that all depends on availability of the vaccine for all, an example no under 16 at present is planned to receive it, does their life (and their families) remain on this island ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"I wouldn't worry. The chances of dying in a plane crash is 1 in 11 million can't see any anti-vaxers taking that risk anyway."

Haha, I heard anti-vaxxers, won't fly in a new plane. Its gotta be 10years old, for some reason

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. And there is never ever any data leaks ? "

If I was going to spend the time and effort breaching a system to get data then I'd want something more than a worthless list of idiots at the end of it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that

Not us then

I don't know if the uk will follow. It might have to, just to make travel possible to the EU.

I meant them sharing it with us, we aren’t in the EU. As for us, as per my post above that all depends on availability of the vaccine for all, an example no under 16 at present is planned to receive it, does their life (and their families) remain on this island ? "

I really don't know how it's going to pan out. I just think it's going to be tightened up a lot.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire


"

Haha, I heard anti-vaxxers, won't fly in a new plane. Its gotta be 10years old, for some reason "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
over a year ago

Hastings


"I wouldn't worry. The chances of dying in a plane crash is 1 in 11 million can't see any anti-vaxers taking that risk anyway.

Haha, I heard anti-vaxxers, won't fly in a new plane. Its gotta be 10years old, for some reason "

Thats cos it burns more fule you dont see them in electric cars ether

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wouldn't worry. The chances of dying in a plane crash is 1 in 11 million can't see any anti-vaxers taking that risk anyway.

Haha, I heard anti-vaxxers, won't fly in a new plane. Its gotta be 10years old, for some reason "

They have to make sure it doesnt crash in the first 10 years before been prepared to take a seat.

KJ

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wouldn't worry. The chances of dying in a plane crash is 1 in 11 million can't see any anti-vaxers taking that risk anyway.

Haha, I heard anti-vaxxers, won't fly in a new plane. Its gotta be 10years old, for some reason "

Good luck on 737 MAX

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dores blackmenWoman
over a year ago

incognito mode ;-)

I've filled in the nhs consent form today,saying I will have the vaccine,so I'm now registered waiting for an appointment

Some staff have signed to decline,so that will be on record,so it is possible it could be used against the people who choose not to take it.

We may not be in the EU however countries are like sheep,The Uk may follow their idea

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agneto.Man
over a year ago

Bham


"I wouldn't worry. The chances of dying in a plane crash is 1 in 11 million can't see any anti-vaxers taking that risk anyway."

Chortle chortle

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agneto.Man
over a year ago

Bham


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. And there is never ever any data leaks ?

If I was going to spend the time and effort breaching a system to get data then I'd want something more than a worthless list of idiots at the end of it."

Could be useful to spammers and con artists, a list of those who'll believe anything.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eah BabyCouple
over a year ago

Cheshire, Windermere ,Cumbria

Don’t worry if it’s Spain doing it then it will probably be 20 years before it comes to fruition lol...Manana Manana

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You actually only make yourselves look a bit childish with your remarks here honestly, listen to yourselves. Education not ridicule is how to show the way forward.

Some people do have genuine fears and anxieties, do you really think these smart remarks help them? Assuming you'd want people to understand better that is or perhaps you don't because who would you have to make fun of and feel superior to?

For heavens sake grow up and if you genuinely want to help people understand better then lead by example, not ridicule.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"You actually only make yourselves look a bit childish with your remarks here honestly, listen to yourselves. Education not ridicule is how to show the way forward.

Some people do have genuine fears and anxieties, do you really think these smart remarks help them? Assuming you'd want people to understand better that is or perhaps you don't because who would you have to make fun of and feel superior to?

For heavens sake grow up and if you genuinely want to help people understand better then lead by example, not ridicule. "

Sorry mum

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensual massagerMan
over a year ago

Bolton


"You actually only make yourselves look a bit childish with your remarks here honestly, listen to yourselves. Education not ridicule is how to show the way forward.

Some people do have genuine fears and anxieties, do you really think these smart remarks help them? Assuming you'd want people to understand better that is or perhaps you don't because who would you have to make fun of and feel superior to?

For heavens sake grow up and if you genuinely want to help people understand better then lead by example, not ridicule. "

Superb

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *leasureMaxDanMan
over a year ago

World Wide Web

Wait a year and they’ll be screaming for unvaccinated brits to come back

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"You actually only make yourselves look a bit childish with your remarks here honestly, listen to yourselves. Education not ridicule is how to show the way forward.

Some people do have genuine fears and anxieties, do you really think these smart remarks help them? Assuming you'd want people to understand better that is or perhaps you don't because who would you have to make fun of and feel superior to?

For heavens sake grow up and if you genuinely want to help people understand better then lead by example, not ridicule. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eachyone69Couple
over a year ago

exeter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

It's a refuse list, not a 'cant have it' list.

It could potentially help countries in their own control measures against the virus.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit? "

This is not so different to the idea that people would need to "prove" they've been vaccinated.

I also think that there is a big difference between "Anti Vaxxers" and people who choose not to be vaccinated. It would be a breach of peoples human rights to force them to be vaccinated, and although I am VERY pro vaccine, I also believe that people MUST be allowed to choose for themselves.

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"You actually only make yourselves look a bit childish with your remarks here honestly, listen to yourselves. Education not ridicule is how to show the way forward.

Some people do have genuine fears and anxieties, do you really think these smart remarks help them? Assuming you'd want people to understand better that is or perhaps you don't because who would you have to make fun of and feel superior to?

For heavens sake grow up and if you genuinely want to help people understand better then lead by example, not ridicule. "

Great point. We all need to be a bit nicer to people with different opinions. It's allowed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit?

This is not so different to the idea that people would need to "prove" they've been vaccinated.

I also think that there is a big difference between "Anti Vaxxers" and people who choose not to be vaccinated. It would be a breach of peoples human rights to force them to be vaccinated, and although I am VERY pro vaccine, I also believe that people MUST be allowed to choose for themselves.

Cal"

Totally agree. Nobody should be forced into it. But people need to understand that there are consequences to their decision

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *08428Man
over a year ago

Shaftesbury

It should be used to refuse treatment for covid19 to anyone who refused the vaccine

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit?

This is not so different to the idea that people would need to "prove" they've been vaccinated.

I also think that there is a big difference between "Anti Vaxxers" and people who choose not to be vaccinated. It would be a breach of peoples human rights to force them to be vaccinated, and although I am VERY pro vaccine, I also believe that people MUST be allowed to choose for themselves.

Cal

-----

Totally agree. Nobody should be forced into it. But people need to understand that there are consequences to their decision "

The ONLY consequence should be "not developing immunity", people should not be penalised for being scared. Are people penalised for not having Flu, Measles, Rubella, Mumps, Polio, Yellow Fever, or any other vaccination?

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit?

This is not so different to the idea that people would need to "prove" they've been vaccinated.

I also think that there is a big difference between "Anti Vaxxers" and people who choose not to be vaccinated. It would be a breach of peoples human rights to force them to be vaccinated, and although I am VERY pro vaccine, I also believe that people MUST be allowed to choose for themselves.

Cal

-----

Totally agree. Nobody should be forced into it. But people need to understand that there are consequences to their decision

The ONLY consequence should be "not developing immunity", people should not be penalised for being scared. Are people penalised for not having Flu, Measles, Rubella, Mumps, Polio, Yellow Fever, or any other vaccination?

Cal"

It's common to be penalised. Some countries demand vaccinations as a condition of entry.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecretlyASoftieWoman
over a year ago

Hull but travel regularly

I’d like every person to continue to have absolute agency over their own body.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley

I think this thread has gone off topic. Should the uk follow suit?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that

Not us then

I don't know if the uk will follow. It might have to, just to make travel possible to the EU.

I meant them sharing it with us, we aren’t in the EU. As for us, as per my post above that all depends on availability of the vaccine for all, an example no under 16 at present is planned to receive it, does their life (and their families) remain on this island ?

I really don't know how it's going to pan out. I just think it's going to be tightened up a lot. "

Likely it will be tightened up in places.

As I’ve said, mute conversation for me until it all becomes clear what happens to those that aren’t even offered the vaccine.

As with most things things regarding the virus, still so many unanswered questions which will take time to answer, no point surmising until all the facts are known.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"I think this thread has gone off topic. Should the uk follow suit? "

Possibly. Depends what it will be used for. Right now I can't think of a good reason but in 12 months when most have been jabbed.... A reason may develop.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit?

This is not so different to the idea that people would need to "prove" they've been vaccinated.

I also think that there is a big difference between "Anti Vaxxers" and people who choose not to be vaccinated. It would be a breach of peoples human rights to force them to be vaccinated, and although I am VERY pro vaccine, I also believe that people MUST be allowed to choose for themselves.

Cal

-----

Totally agree. Nobody should be forced into it. But people need to understand that there are consequences to their decision

The ONLY consequence should be "not developing immunity", people should not be penalised for being scared. Are people penalised for not having Flu, Measles, Rubella, Mumps, Polio, Yellow Fever, or any other vaccination?

Cal

---

It's common to be penalised. Some countries demand vaccinations as a condition of entry. "

That's not really a penalty. Some countries may choose to not admit unvaccinated visitors, but I will be surprised, it tends to be a response to a geographic threat. As long as there is a covid issue around the world, a required negative test is more likely... especially when the perceived expectation of the length of immunity could range from "3 months" upwards.

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"I think this thread has gone off topic. Should the uk follow suit? "

To be honest, it's not required. There WILL be a record of who has been vaccinated, if they're not on the list then they haven't been vaccinated.

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit? "
Well I can see where they are going with this we may need to if we want to go for holidays in Europe a very good idea.I know most here will not agree,more room at the pool for me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uck-RogersMan
over a year ago

Oakhill

I am gonna wait until they offer a free holiday to those who have the vac

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ickthelick2001Man
over a year ago

nottingham

and the chances of you getting killed by medical error is 1 in 300 so maybe us anti vaxxers have a valid point ?

If you were admitted to hospital tomorrow in any country... your chances of being subjected to an error in your care would be something like 1 in 10. Your chances of dying due to an error in health care would be 1 in 300,” Liam Donaldson, the WHO’s newly appointed envoy for patient safety, told a news briefing.

This compared with a risk of dying in an air crash of about 1 in 10 million passengers, according to Donaldson, formerly England’s chief medical officer.

“It shows that health care generally worldwide still has a long way to go,” he said.

Hundreds of millions of people suffer infections linked to health care each year. Patients should ask questions and be part of decision-making in hospitals, which must use basic hygiene standards and WHO’s checklist to ensure safe surgical procedures were followed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"and the chances of you getting killed by medical error is 1 in 300 so maybe us anti vaxxers have a valid point ?

If you were admitted to hospital tomorrow in any country... your chances of being subjected to an error in your care would be something like 1 in 10. Your chances of dying due to an error in health care would be 1 in 300,” Liam Donaldson, the WHO’s newly appointed envoy for patient safety, told a news briefing.

This compared with a risk of dying in an air crash of about 1 in 10 million passengers, according to Donaldson, formerly England’s chief medical officer.

“It shows that health care generally worldwide still has a long way to go,” he said.

Hundreds of millions of people suffer infections linked to health care each year. Patients should ask questions and be part of decision-making in hospitals, which must use basic hygiene standards and WHO’s checklist to ensure safe surgical procedures were followed."

Except you're not refusing medical care... you're having that whole heartedly.

You're refusing vaccines so yeah still nowhere near valid. Ridiculous by any measure.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"and the chances of you getting killed by medical error is 1 in 300 so maybe us anti vaxxers have a valid point ?

If you were admitted to hospital tomorrow in any country... your chances of being subjected to an error in your care would be something like 1 in 10. Your chances of dying due to an error in health care would be 1 in 300,” Liam Donaldson, the WHO’s newly appointed envoy for patient safety, told a news briefing.

This compared with a risk of dying in an air crash of about 1 in 10 million passengers, according to Donaldson, formerly England’s chief medical officer.

“It shows that health care generally worldwide still has a long way to go,” he said.

Hundreds of millions of people suffer infections linked to health care each year. Patients should ask questions and be part of decision-making in hospitals, which must use basic hygiene standards and WHO’s checklist to ensure safe surgical procedures were followed."

Hundreds of millions "suffer" injections? Bit dramatic, don't ya think?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"and the chances of you getting killed by medical error is 1 in 300 so maybe us anti vaxxers have a valid point ?

If you were admitted to hospital tomorrow in any country... your chances of being subjected to an error in your care would be something like 1 in 10. Your chances of dying due to an error in health care would be 1 in 300,” Liam Donaldson, the WHO’s newly appointed envoy for patient safety, told a news briefing.

This compared with a risk of dying in an air crash of about 1 in 10 million passengers, according to Donaldson, formerly England’s chief medical officer.

“It shows that health care generally worldwide still has a long way to go,” he said.

Hundreds of millions of people suffer infections linked to health care each year. Patients should ask questions and be part of decision-making in hospitals, which must use basic hygiene standards and WHO’s checklist to ensure safe surgical procedures were followed.

Hundreds of millions "suffer" injections? Bit dramatic, don't ya think? "

*infections *

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral


"and the chances of you getting killed by medical error is 1 in 300 so maybe us anti vaxxers have a valid point ?

If you were admitted to hospital tomorrow in any country... your chances of being subjected to an error in your care would be something like 1 in 10. Your chances of dying due to an error in health care would be 1 in 300,” Liam Donaldson, the WHO’s newly appointed envoy for patient safety, told a news briefing.

This compared with a risk of dying in an air crash of about 1 in 10 million passengers, according to Donaldson, formerly England’s chief medical officer.

“It shows that health care generally worldwide still has a long way to go,” he said.

Hundreds of millions of people suffer infections linked to health care each year. Patients should ask questions and be part of decision-making in hospitals, which must use basic hygiene standards and WHO’s checklist to ensure safe surgical procedures were followed."

It is easy to get on a board of govenors for any hospital I have been invited many times

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ussymufferMan
over a year ago

Lanarkshire

The vaccination only last about six months so what's all the fuss by the time the people that have been vacinated first will need another one and the people still waiting wil put more pressure on the system

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"and the chances of you getting killed by medical error is 1 in 300 so maybe us anti vaxxers have a valid point ?

If you were admitted to hospital tomorrow in any country... your chances of being subjected to an error in your care would be something like 1 in 10. Your chances of dying due to an error in health care would be 1 in 300,” Liam Donaldson, the WHO’s newly appointed envoy for patient safety, told a news briefing.

This compared with a risk of dying in an air crash of about 1 in 10 million passengers, according to Donaldson, formerly England’s chief medical officer.

“It shows that health care generally worldwide still has a long way to go,” he said.

Hundreds of millions of people suffer infections linked to health care each year. Patients should ask questions and be part of decision-making in hospitals, which must use basic hygiene standards and WHO’s checklist to ensure safe surgical procedures were followed.It is easy to get on a board of govenors for any hospital I have been invited many times"

Really

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION. Stoke FREE ENTRANCE ALL WEEKEND


"Definitely not must be against Human rights "

Can't get into many countries without a yellow fever jab or a malaria jab. Your right to refuse and their right to refuse you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. And there is never ever any data leaks ? "

how often is your passport and drivers license leaked? and km sure your medical records are constantly all over the internet

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION. Stoke FREE ENTRANCE ALL WEEKEND


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. And there is never ever any data leaks ?

how often is your passport and drivers license leaked? and km sure your medical records are constantly all over the internet"

Your Passport and Drivers details have been shared across europe everytime you reach a border post. This will continue after Brexit too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Definitely not must be against Human rights "

What about protecting everyone else's human rights?

Why shouldn't there be a register for people who refuse to be vaccinated, due to personal choice. Soon you will need to be vaccinated to travel abroad.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The vaccination only last about six months so what's all the fuss by the time the people that have been vacinated first will need another one and the people still waiting wil put more pressure on the system "

There is absolutely no proof as to how long the vaccination will protect you for.

Where is your evidence of this?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. And there is never ever any data leaks ?

how often is your passport and drivers license leaked? and km sure your medical records are constantly all over the internet

Your Passport and Drivers details have been shared across europe everytime you reach a border post. This will continue after Brexit too."

yep , i cant see how this poses a greater risk

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION. Stoke FREE ENTRANCE ALL WEEKEND


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. And there is never ever any data leaks ?

how often is your passport and drivers license leaked? and km sure your medical records are constantly all over the internet

Your Passport and Drivers details have been shared across europe everytime you reach a border post. This will continue after Brexit too.

yep , i cant see how this poses a greater risk "

Neither do I lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agneto.Man
over a year ago

Bham


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit?

This is not so different to the idea that people would need to "prove" they've been vaccinated.

I also think that there is a big difference between "Anti Vaxxers" and people who choose not to be vaccinated. It would be a breach of peoples human rights to force them to be vaccinated, and although I am VERY pro vaccine, I also believe that people MUST be allowed to choose for themselves.

Cal

Totally agree. Nobody should be forced into it. But people need to understand that there are consequences to their decision "

Yeah no one should be forced into it and equally no country should be forced to grant entry to everyone.

It's perfectly acceptable for nations who are trying to control Covid in their country to only grant a visa to those who have been vaccinated. Don't think that's unreasonable at all.

Those with medical exemptions are different, so a refusal list would be a good workaround for that.

I'm sure not all countries would sign up to this, so you might get vaccine refusers going off to places like Tunisia instead of EU destinations.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire


"Definitely not must be against Human rights "

Nope.

The UN say that some human rights can be pushed aside in the case of a national emergency.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hickennchipsWoman
over a year ago

up above the streets and houses

National emergency

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *razyhappyguys04Couple
over a year ago

London.

We won't take the vaccine inside info says don't,, so we won't be flying so we guess its a dinghy xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"You actually only make yourselves look a bit childish with your remarks here honestly, listen to yourselves. Education not ridicule is how to show the way forward.

Some people do have genuine fears and anxieties, do you really think these smart remarks help them? Assuming you'd want people to understand better that is or perhaps you don't because who would you have to make fun of and feel superior to?

For heavens sake grow up and if you genuinely want to help people understand better then lead by example, not ridicule. "

Unfortunately most of the anti-vaxxers on here aren't in the "fears and anxieties" camp they're in the "What COVID? It doesn't exist because we want to be fucking everyone" camp.

And 8/9 months of people trying to explain to them how serious the pandemic is hasn't made a jot of difference.

Not sure there are any people trying to feel superior to anyone else either. I think we're all just a little frustrated that some people refuse to listen to experts but they're more than happy to quote loons off YouTube, Facebook or Twitter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dam_TinaCouple
over a year ago

Hampshire


"We won't take the vaccine inside info says don't,, so we won't be flying so we guess its a dinghy xx "

Lols @ 'inside info'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estivalMan
over a year ago

borehamwood


"It should be used to refuse treatment for covid19 to anyone who refused the vaccine "

if thats the case i hope those people will be refunded any money they have payed the nhs over the years.lets go even further.u smoke no treatment for any smoking related illness have health issues because u eat to much sorry piss off.your a junkie whos overdosed sorry mate your own fault

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. And there is never ever any data leaks ?

If I was going to spend the time and effort breaching a system to get data then I'd want something more than a worthless list of idiots at the end of it."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"It should be used to refuse treatment for covid19 to anyone who refused the vaccine

if thats the case i hope those people will be refunded any money they have payed the nhs over the years.lets go even further.u smoke no treatment for any smoking related illness have health issues because u eat to much sorry piss off.your a junkie whos overdosed sorry mate your own fault"

Rather extreme but people being "helped" with carrot and stick to take some responsibility for their choices wouldn't be a bad thing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rotic-TouchTV/TS
over a year ago

doncaster

It's a brilliant idea and I hope that the rest of the world adopts this too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondCougarWoman
over a year ago

Norfuck! / Lincolnshire


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit? "

They are merely registering non uptake so they can monitor how many do not. If there is not enough uptake a vaccine then becomes useless. Spain has a proliferation of the new variant

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *assion and MoreCouple
over a year ago

Here and There, Monaghan


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit?

They are merely registering non uptake so they can monitor how many do not. If there is not enough uptake a vaccine then becomes useless. Spain has a proliferation of the new variant"

My understanding is that every country will have some sort of register of who has been administered the vaccine, common practice in the administration of medication. Thereby a default list of those who haven't.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondCougarWoman
over a year ago

Norfuck! / Lincolnshire


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit?

They are merely registering non uptake so they can monitor how many do not. If there is not enough uptake a vaccine then becomes useless. Spain has a proliferation of the new variant

My understanding is that every country will have some sort of register of who has been administered the vaccine, common practice in the administration of medication. Thereby a default list of those who haven't. "

I would say you’re probably right and no reason why they shouldn’t. After all, should there be an outbreak after vaccines have been administered they will want to know if you did or didn’t

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They will have records of who does get the vaccine, so by a very complex mathematical equation they will also know who doesn't.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch


"

I would say you’re probably right and no reason why they shouldn’t. After all, should there be an outbreak after vaccines have been administered they will want to know if you did or didn’t "

This ^ it’s one of those unanswered questions, has it worked and if so how long did the level of protection last

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley

The Spanish have used the term "refusal list". I presume medically exempt, would be different?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch


"The Spanish have used the term "refusal list". I presume medically exempt, would be different? "

You would hope so, is that then another list, so three lists in total

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hil_SW19Man
over a year ago

Raynes Park

Everyone who refuses the COVID vaccine should no longer be allowed to have holiday jabs.

So you might be yellow fever, but you probably will survive statistically speaking

????

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab james OP   Man
over a year ago

ribble valley


"The Spanish have used the term "refusal list". I presume medically exempt, would be different?

You would hope so, is that then another list, so three lists in total "

And a list of people to administer the lists, cripes, it's more complex than first meets the eye

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothdickMan
over a year ago

stoke

I wish the Brit government would make a law that once you’ve had it, then the data goes into yr British passport or driving licence ... bolox to human rights in this case ... I love travelling and have no prob that the vaccination is registered on a data base and shared to all border agencies.... fuck the revolution

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire


"

My understanding is that every country will have some sort of register of who has been administered the vaccine, common practice in the administration of medication. Thereby a default list of those who haven't. "

Your GP has a record of all your vaccinations from childhood onwards, so not adding the covid vaccine to it is unlikely.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch


"The Spanish have used the term "refusal list". I presume medically exempt, would be different?

You would hope so, is that then another list, so three lists in total

And a list of people to administer the lists, cripes, it's more complex than first meets the eye "

But on the plus side could provide employment opportunities to administer it .... now imagine if it’s not a one stop (well two stop) jab and needs to be completed yearly....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"I wish the Brit government would make a law that once you’ve had it, then the data goes into yr British passport or driving licence ... bolox to human rights in this case ... I love travelling and have no prob that the vaccination is registered on a data base and shared to all border agencies.... fuck the revolution "

I'm sorry, but if you say "bolox to human rights in this case" then those rights are gone for everything. People really must have the choice.

It is completely fine for countries to impose entry requirements (eg vaccines), because people have the choice not to visit those countries. Forcing people to accept a vaccine if they don't want it is just not acceptable, and the sort of behaviour which could be the start of a slippery slope. What's next... mandatory sterilisation of people with genetic disorders, or maybe compulsory contraceptive injections for people with a low IQ.

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wish the Brit government would make a law that once you’ve had it, then the data goes into yr British passport or driving licence ... bolox to human rights in this case ... I love travelling and have no prob that the vaccination is registered on a data base and shared to all border agencies.... fuck the revolution

I'm sorry, but if you say "bolox to human rights in this case" then those rights are gone for everything. People really must have the choice.

It is completely fine for countries to impose entry requirements (eg vaccines), because people have the choice not to visit those countries. Forcing people to accept a vaccine if they don't want it is just not acceptable, and the sort of behaviour which could be the start of a slippery slope. What's next... mandatory sterilisation of people with genetic disorders, or maybe compulsory contraceptive injections for people with a low IQ.

Cal"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION. Stoke FREE ENTRANCE ALL WEEKEND


"I wish the Brit government would make a law that once you’ve had it, then the data goes into yr British passport or driving licence ... bolox to human rights in this case ... I love travelling and have no prob that the vaccination is registered on a data base and shared to all border agencies.... fuck the revolution

I'm sorry, but if you say "bolox to human rights in this case" then those rights are gone for everything. People really must have the choice.

It is completely fine for countries to impose entry requirements (eg vaccines), because people have the choice not to visit those countries. Forcing people to accept a vaccine if they don't want it is just not acceptable, and the sort of behaviour which could be the start of a slippery slope. What's next... mandatory sterilisation of people with genetic disorders, or maybe compulsory contraceptive injections for people with a low IQ.

Cal"

Agree. Your right to refuse it - and a countries right to refuse you entry. And that's as far as it should go.

But I do suspect that an anti-vaxxer would change their minds if say they holiday mostly in Europe and then the whole of Europe decides it's required lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit?

They are merely registering non uptake so they can monitor how many do not. If there is not enough uptake a vaccine then becomes useless. Spain has a proliferation of the new variant

My understanding is that every country will have some sort of register of who has been administered the vaccine, common practice in the administration of medication. Thereby a default list of those who haven't. "

Not exactly. You've got all the undocumented unregistered.. Ie you don't know what you don't know as someone famous once said.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"I wish the Brit government would make a law that once you’ve had it, then the data goes into yr British passport or driving licence ... bolox to human rights in this case ... I love travelling and have no prob that the vaccination is registered on a data base and shared to all border agencies.... fuck the revolution

I'm sorry, but if you say "bolox to human rights in this case" then those rights are gone for everything. People really must have the choice.

It is completely fine for countries to impose entry requirements (eg vaccines), because people have the choice not to visit those countries. Forcing people to accept a vaccine if they don't want it is just not acceptable, and the sort of behaviour which could be the start of a slippery slope. What's next... mandatory sterilisation of people with genetic disorders, or maybe compulsory contraceptive injections for people with a low IQ.

Cal

Agree. Your right to refuse it - and a countries right to refuse you entry. And that's as far as it should go.

But I do suspect that an anti-vaxxer would change their minds if say they holiday mostly in Europe and then the whole of Europe decides it's required lol.

"

If its a way of keeping the brits out there's a good chance of that!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"I wish the Brit government would make a law that once you’ve had it, then the data goes into yr British passport or driving licence ... bolox to human rights in this case ... I love travelling and have no prob that the vaccination is registered on a data base and shared to all border agencies.... fuck the revolution

I'm sorry, but if you say "bolox to human rights in this case" then those rights are gone for everything. People really must have the choice.

It is completely fine for countries to impose entry requirements (eg vaccines), because people have the choice not to visit those countries. Forcing people to accept a vaccine if they don't want it is just not acceptable, and the sort of behaviour which could be the start of a slippery slope. What's next... mandatory sterilisation of people with genetic disorders, or maybe compulsory contraceptive injections for people with a low IQ.

Cal

------

Agree. Your right to refuse it - and a countries right to refuse you entry. And that's as far as it should go.

But I do suspect that an anti-vaxxer would change their minds if say they holiday mostly in Europe and then the whole of Europe decides it's required lol.

"

I personally totally intend to have the vaccine, I even think that everyone "should" have it, I'm just against making people have it.

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION. Stoke FREE ENTRANCE ALL WEEKEND


"

I personally totally intend to have the vaccine, I even think that everyone "should" have it, I'm just against making people have it.

Cal"

Me too. And I'm happy for others who don't have it to send me cards thanking me for protecting them from the virus lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.

People getting shitty about this are thinking very selfishly as usual.

Think about Spain and what a massive source of their income comes from?

Hundreds of thousands of Brits descending on the beaches and club's every year acting let's be honest like fucking animals and the Spanish because it brings in the Wonga tolerate it.

So moving forward if people want to travel abroad and go on holiday are required to have proof of update vaccinations them that's really upto them as as much as they are trying to protect the population against the spread of covid they are probably thinking about keeping their economy moving by being able to allow the holiday destinations to stay open for business.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arlomaleMan
over a year ago

darlington


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit? "
clever thinking on the behalf of the Spanish government

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agneto.Man
over a year ago

Bham


"You actually only make yourselves look a bit childish with your remarks here honestly, listen to yourselves. Education not ridicule is how to show the way forward.

Some people do have genuine fears and anxieties, do you really think these smart remarks help them? Assuming you'd want people to understand better that is or perhaps you don't because who would you have to make fun of and feel superior to?

For heavens sake grow up and if you genuinely want to help people understand better then lead by example, not ridicule.

Unfortunately most of the anti-vaxxers on here aren't in the "fears and anxieties" camp they're in the "What COVID? It doesn't exist because we want to be fucking everyone" camp.

And 8/9 months of people trying to explain to them how serious the pandemic is hasn't made a jot of difference.

Not sure there are any people trying to feel superior to anyone else either. I think we're all just a little frustrated that some people refuse to listen to experts but they're more than happy to quote loons off YouTube, Facebook or Twitter."

Exactly. After all this time and they're still talking about bill gates, wef, great reset blah blah blah. They don't believe anything unless it's their favourite youtuber or a Facebook repost.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lamourpussyCouple
over a year ago

Cirencester


"We won't take the vaccine inside info says don't,, so we won't be flying so we guess its a dinghy xx "

I would like to know what reputable information says don’t take the vaccine! We all know that anything we do has some risk associated to it and taking any medication or vaccine is no different but nearly 1 in 1000 in the UK have already died of COVID and thousands more have life changing illnesses and no doubt many more will die. Well over a million people worldwide have already had the Pfizer vaccine, a handful have had serious reactions but no one has died. I know which odds I prefer.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hatawasteMan
over a year ago

stafford

My thinking is by all means allow people the choice not to have any kind of vaccine . Human rights respected .Medical grounds certainly makes sense .

However , I think it should be made clear that blatant refusal on the grounds of not wanting it or not trusting it means a degree of responsibility to everyone else .

Let's call it a ' duty of care' and that being that ' liberties' afforded to everyone else are not included for people who can't prove they are 'safe' .. flying and leaving the country particularly should not be allowed .

Arguably there is also a case for making anyone who could have taken the vaccine who gets sick have to pay for their treatment . I know people say it's like alcoholics ,drug users and smokers being the same thing .. it is ..but not as serious I would say .

Finally I also think it won't be long before proof of vaccination is going to become an important requirement / selection criteria / condition for a while host of other things over the next few years .. just think about huge additional costs to insurance policies just for starters .. public liability for self employed .. can you enter someone's house without proving you are Covid free or vaccinated ? I would suggest you can't or won't .. that would also apply to customers too ..

Regardless of what worries people have over this vaccination I really don't think there is a way of avoiding it and being allowed to be an active member of society unless there are real medical grounds to stop you from having it .. sure you can live ' off grid' and avoid it all or try to .. but the reality is most won't and everyone wants to return to normal as soon as we can .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL

No.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *assion and MoreCouple
over a year ago

Here and There, Monaghan


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit?

They are merely registering non uptake so they can monitor how many do not. If there is not enough uptake a vaccine then becomes useless. Spain has a proliferation of the new variant

My understanding is that every country will have some sort of register of who has been administered the vaccine, common practice in the administration of medication. Thereby a default list of those who haven't.

Not exactly. You've got all the undocumented unregistered.. Ie you don't know what you don't know as someone famous once said. "

True, but they won't have been vaccinated so they won't be on the list.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Definitely not must be against Human rights "

But its against my Human Rights or anyone else's if they contract and give someone else the virus. Only exception should be medical grounds.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rotic-TouchTV/TS
over a year ago

doncaster


"Definitely not must be against Human rights "
how must it ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Let's call it a ' duty of care' and that being that ' liberties' afforded to everyone else are not included for people who can't prove they are 'safe' .. flying and leaving the country particularly should not be allowed . "

Why? If the person who takes vaccine is protected. The person who decides not to take it puts own life in dangoure, and others who decide the same.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"

Let's call it a ' duty of care' and that being that ' liberties' afforded to everyone else are not included for people who can't prove they are 'safe' .. flying and leaving the country particularly should not be allowed .

Why? If the person who takes vaccine is protected. The person who decides not to take it puts own life in dangoure, and others who decide the same.

"

The vaccinated can still act as carriers for the virus and pass it on to others. Also it won't prevent them from catching it either. It will lessen symptoms though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Let's call it a ' duty of care' and that being that ' liberties' afforded to everyone else are not included for people who can't prove they are 'safe' .. flying and leaving the country particularly should not be allowed .

Why? If the person who takes vaccine is protected. The person who decides not to take it puts own life in dangoure, and others who decide the same.

The vaccinated can still act as carriers for the virus and pass it on to others. Also it won't prevent them from catching it either. It will lessen symptoms though. "

So vaccination doesn't make sense.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rotic-TouchTV/TS
over a year ago

doncaster


"

Let's call it a ' duty of care' and that being that ' liberties' afforded to everyone else are not included for people who can't prove they are 'safe' .. flying and leaving the country particularly should not be allowed .

Why? If the person who takes vaccine is protected. The person who decides not to take it puts own life in dangoure, and others who decide the same.

The vaccinated can still act as carriers for the virus and pass it on to others. Also it won't prevent them from catching it either. It will lessen symptoms though. "

actually the science on transmission after vaccination is still not know yet

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"

Let's call it a ' duty of care' and that being that ' liberties' afforded to everyone else are not included for people who can't prove they are 'safe' .. flying and leaving the country particularly should not be allowed .

Why? If the person who takes vaccine is protected. The person who decides not to take it puts own life in dangoure, and others who decide the same.

The vaccinated can still act as carriers for the virus and pass it on to others. Also it won't prevent them from catching it either. It will lessen symptoms though.

So vaccination doesn't make sense. "

I didn't say that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"

Let's call it a ' duty of care' and that being that ' liberties' afforded to everyone else are not included for people who can't prove they are 'safe' .. flying and leaving the country particularly should not be allowed .

Why? If the person who takes vaccine is protected. The person who decides not to take it puts own life in dangoure, and others who decide the same.

The vaccinated can still act as carriers for the virus and pass it on to others. Also it won't prevent them from catching it either. It will lessen symptoms though. actually the science on transmission after vaccination is still not know yet "

Neither are the long term effects of covid or the vaccination.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Let's call it a ' duty of care' and that being that ' liberties' afforded to everyone else are not included for people who can't prove they are 'safe' .. flying and leaving the country particularly should not be allowed .

Why? If the person who takes vaccine is protected. The person who decides not to take it puts own life in dangoure, and others who decide the same.

The vaccinated can still act as carriers for the virus and pass it on to others. Also it won't prevent them from catching it either. It will lessen symptoms though. actually the science on transmission after vaccination is still not know yet

Neither are the long term effects of covid or the vaccination. "

How the long time effects can be known after such a short time?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"

Let's call it a ' duty of care' and that being that ' liberties' afforded to everyone else are not included for people who can't prove they are 'safe' .. flying and leaving the country particularly should not be allowed .

Why? If the person who takes vaccine is protected. The person who decides not to take it puts own life in dangoure, and others who decide the same.

The vaccinated can still act as carriers for the virus and pass it on to others. Also it won't prevent them from catching it either. It will lessen symptoms though. actually the science on transmission after vaccination is still not know yet

Neither are the long term effects of covid or the vaccination.

How the long time effects can be known after such a short time? "

They can't. I was just pointing it out in response to your post.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rotic-TouchTV/TS
over a year ago

doncaster


"

Let's call it a ' duty of care' and that being that ' liberties' afforded to everyone else are not included for people who can't prove they are 'safe' .. flying and leaving the country particularly should not be allowed .

Why? If the person who takes vaccine is protected. The person who decides not to take it puts own life in dangoure, and others who decide the same.

The vaccinated can still act as carriers for the virus and pass it on to others. Also it won't prevent them from catching it either. It will lessen symptoms though. actually the science on transmission after vaccination is still not know yet

Neither are the long term effects of covid or the vaccination. "

well let's hope the vaccine stops putting ppl in hospital and some dying and the lockdowns ending and the economy revives given time jvt said yesterday it will probably be a couple of months yet before the effect of the vaccine can be more stringently assessed , regarding the long term effects of the vaccine I will take my chances

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"

Let's call it a ' duty of care' and that being that ' liberties' afforded to everyone else are not included for people who can't prove they are 'safe' .. flying and leaving the country particularly should not be allowed .

Why? If the person who takes vaccine is protected. The person who decides not to take it puts own life in dangoure, and others who decide the same.

The vaccinated can still act as carriers for the virus and pass it on to others. Also it won't prevent them from catching it either. It will lessen symptoms though. actually the science on transmission after vaccination is still not know yet

Neither are the long term effects of covid or the vaccination. well let's hope the vaccine stops putting ppl in hospital and some dying and the lockdowns ending and the economy revives given time jvt said yesterday it will probably be a couple of months yet before the effect of the vaccine can be more stringently assessed , regarding the long term effects of the vaccine I will take my chances "

Agreed. We are learning new things every day. Hopefully 2021 will be a better year.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

They can't. I was just pointing it out in response to your post. "

Hold on, how do you know there are long time effects of covid? Are you just assuming there are any?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aekaeWoman
over a year ago

Between a cock and a soft place


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. And there is never ever any data leaks ?

If I was going to spend the time and effort breaching a system to get data then I'd want something more than a worthless list of idiots at the end of it."

You now owe me a cup of tea and a keyboard.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. And there is never ever any data leaks ?

If I was going to spend the time and effort breaching a system to get data then I'd want something more than a worthless list of idiots at the end of it.

You now owe me a cup of tea and a keyboard.

"

Oops, sorry...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL

[Removed by poster at 01/01/21 12:40:29]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL

[Removed by poster at 01/01/21 12:43:26]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"

They can't. I was just pointing it out in response to your post.

Hold on, how do you know there are long time effects of covid? Are you just assuming there are any? "

I had it a few mths ago, I'm still not right now, so I only know about what it feels like after a few mths. Also depends how long long term is, mths, years, decades? Perhaps you could stop nitpicking my posts now.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *actilemale4uMan
over a year ago

London

I would not be surprised if in future you will not able to enter a country unless you have a valid certificate to prove you have been inoculated against Covid or have an exception certificate

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amish SMan
over a year ago

Eastleigh


"I would not be surprised if in future you will not able to enter a country unless you have a valid certificate to prove you have been inoculated against Covid or have an exception certificate "

Just like the old days then, some countries still insist on certain inoculations.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Spain is settling up a registar of the folk who refuse the vaccine. It has said it will be shared with the rest of the EU. Should the uk follow suit? "

Franco would be ever so proud

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *08428Man
over a year ago

Shaftesbury

As long as the list was only used to refuse treatment for covid to those who refuse to be vaccinated, and only those who are anti vaccination not those with justifiable reasons for not having the vaccine, such as medical grounds.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aekaeWoman
over a year ago

Between a cock and a soft place


"Definitely not must be against Human rights

It's said it won't be public and only shared with other governments. No human rights laws stop it. And you believe they won’t share it ?

They will share it. With the rest of the EU. They've said that. And there is never ever any data leaks ?

If I was going to spend the time and effort breaching a system to get data then I'd want something more than a worthless list of idiots at the end of it.

You now owe me a cup of tea and a keyboard.

Oops, sorry... "

Compensation please.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *osforthMan
over a year ago

newcastle on tyne

Says who? Where is this so called list of human rights people bang on about? What about the human right to know if you're standing next to an idiot? On a relate topic antivaccers are good for the rest of us = more vaccine for those who want it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top