FabSwingers.com forum: 388

By *usybee73 OP Man
over a year ago

in the sticks

388 people have died under the age of 60 with no underlying conditions ...

The figures show that 1,979 previously healthy people died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 between April 2 and December 23.

Just 338 of these people were aged 40 to 59, with another 44 aged between 20 and 39, and just six under the age of 19, according to the data.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9090847/Only-377-people-aged-60-no-underlying-health-conditions-died-Covid-UK.html#comments

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *agneto.Man
over a year ago

Bham

Great. Let's forget social distancing, throw the masks in the bin, forget working from home, don't bother sanitising everywhere you go and let's drive those numbers up.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ap d agde coupleCouple
over a year ago

Broadstairs

Or put into perspective 500 people under 50 die each week or for people under 60 of which there is 53 million they have a 0.00071132 chance

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Great. Let's forget social distancing, throw the masks in the bin, forget working from home, don't bother sanitising everywhere you go and let's drive those numbers up. "
. Is that what you want to happen then ? Explain

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London

"Great. Let's forget social distancing, throw the masks in the bin, forget working from home, don't bother sanitising everywhere you go and let's drive those numbers up. . Is that what you want to happen then ? Explain"

I read it as sarcasm/exasperation.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ap d agde coupleCouple
over a year ago

Broadstairs

"388 people have died under the age of 60 with no underlying conditions ...

The figures show that 1,979 previously healthy people died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 between April 2 and December 23.

Just 338 of these people were aged 40 to 59, with another 44 aged between 20 and 39, and just six under the age of 19, according to the data.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9090847/Only-377-people-aged-60-no-underlying-health-conditions-died-Covid-UK.html#comments"
Those figures where from NHS Data

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry

Groundhog day, again.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"388 people have died under the age of 60 with no underlying conditions ...

The figures show that 1,979 previously healthy people died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 between April 2 and December 23.

Just 338 of these people were aged 40 to 59, with another 44 aged between 20 and 39, and just six under the age of 19, according to the data.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9090847/Only-377-people-aged-60-no-underlying-health-conditions-died-Covid-UK.html#comments"

And? Is there a point you're making?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ools and the brainCouple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.

"388 people have died under the age of 60 with no underlying conditions ...

The figures show that 1,979 previously healthy people died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 between April 2 and December 23.

Just 338 of these people were aged 40 to 59, with another 44 aged between 20 and 39, and just six under the age of 19, according to the data.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9090847/Only-377-people-aged-60-no-underlying-health-conditions-died-Covid-UK.html#comments"

What's your point?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"388 people have died under the age of 60 with no underlying conditions ...

The figures show that 1,979 previously healthy people died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 between April 2 and December 23.

Just 338 of these people were aged 40 to 59, with another 44 aged between 20 and 39, and just six under the age of 19, according to the data.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9090847/Only-377-people-aged-60-no-underlying-health-conditions-died-Covid-UK.html#comments

What's your point?"

His point is he reads the daily fail. Enough said

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'll bite.

Underlying health conditions. What do you imagine that to be?

An estimated 22% of the world's population have underlying health conditions which may put them at risk should they contract covid. And that's just the known conditions.

Having an underlying health condition doesn't necessarily mean you're at death's door. So many people live full lives with their underlying health conditions. Some people are living with underlying health conditions and don't even know it.

So again, your point is?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ir-spunk-alotMan
over a year ago

Southern England

You do realise what they class as an underlying health condition is right?

Over weight

Smokers

Mild asthmatics

Some dont even know they have underlying health conditions.

The list goes on.

Should these be exposed and have an increased risk of dyinh way before their time is up??

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Great. Let's forget social distancing, throw the masks in the bin, forget working from home, don't bother sanitising everywhere you go and let's drive those numbers up. "

and cull the over 60's so people can shag strangers again.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *vbride1963TV/TS
over a year ago

E.K . Glasgow

"Great. Let's forget social distancing, throw the masks in the bin, forget working from home, don't bother sanitising everywhere you go and let's drive those numbers up.

and cull the over 60's so people can shag strangers again.

Over 65’s will save the government a fortune in pension payments then the private pensions won’t be paying out more profit for the shareholders of them .

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

On the other hand OP: If you take age out of the equation, 10% of all the deaths were people with "no underlying health conditions".

It is a well known FACT that age is a major factor in how badly the virus effect people. I suppose the real question is "At what age do YOU think people cease to be important? "

Cal

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

"Great. Let's forget social distancing, throw the masks in the bin, forget working from home, don't bother sanitising everywhere you go and let's drive those numbers up.

and cull the over 60's so people can shag strangers again.

But... if you cull the over 60's I can guarantee that in the next set of figures 100% of deaths will be in the under 60's group

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ungblackbullMan
over a year ago

scotland

"I'll bite.

Underlying health conditions. What do you imagine that to be?

An estimated 22% of the world's population have underlying health conditions which may put them at risk should they contract covid. And that's just the known conditions.

So again, your point is?

Exactly. Underlying health conditions does not mean life limiting. Some right brain dead covidiots posting on here.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ungblackbullMan
over a year ago

scotland

"On the other hand OP: If you take age out of the equation, 10% of all the deaths were people with "no underlying health conditions".

It is a well known FACT that age is a major factor in how badly the virus effect people. I suppose the real question is "At what age do YOU think people cease to be important? "

Cal"

They cease to be important when they aren't earning or spending their private pension. That means that there are lot of younger people who aren't important but retired people who are. Well at least until they need hospital treatment that exceeds their contributions.

Obviously I am not being serious here BUT there are a lot of older people who are more valuable to the economy than some of the idiots who think it's only older people dying so no big deal.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *lik and PaulCouple
over a year ago

Flagrante

"388 people have died under the age of 60 with no underlying conditions ...

The figures show that 1,979 previously healthy people died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 between April 2 and December 23.

Just 338 of these people were aged 40 to 59, with another 44 aged between 20 and 39, and just six under the age of 19, according to the data.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9090847/Only-377-people-aged-60-no-underlying-health-conditions-died-Covid-UK.html#comments"

Thanks for the numbers OP....very sad...just goes to show that no one is safe and we must all keep doing our bit to get this under control.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

Great that we've kept some infections, deaths etc down. Now we just need to continue to reduce the stupid things that people are doing or thinking about.

It's everybody's problem, however they may experience it. Stay in this together for the greater good

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *olly_chromaticTV/TS
over a year ago

Stockport

"388 people have died under the age of 60 with no underlying conditions ...

The figures show that 1,979 previously healthy people died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 between April 2 and December 23.

Just 338 of these people were aged 40 to 59, with another 44 aged between 20 and 39, and just six under the age of 19, according to the data.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9090847/Only-377-people-aged-60-no-underlying-health-conditions-died-Covid-UK.html#comments"

Just shows what a shitty excuse for a newspaper the Mail is, that it runs misleading and dangerous behaviour promoting crap like this and pretends that it's news. It may technically sail just within the limits of truth, but the spin that it puts on nearly any topic is disgusting. The owners of the Mail would not just stab their own granny if it would make a headline and bring in money, but they do everything they can to seed discord in society, increase mistrust of science, and stunt any intellectual growth in their readership.

The editor of the Mail will be wanking himself sore at the thought of persuading yet another dumb schmuck to pass this virus on to their family. The Daily Mail is a filthy rag that would foul your arse if you used it as bog roll.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Great. Let's forget social distancing, throw the masks in the bin, forget working from home, don't bother sanitising everywhere you go and let's drive those numbers up.

and cull the over 60's so people can shag strangers again.

But... if you cull the over 60's I can guarantee that in the next set of figures 100% of deaths will be in the under 60's group"

Oh crikey you're right. That won't go down well....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"388 people have died under the age of 60 with no underlying conditions ...

The figures show that 1,979 previously healthy people died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 between April 2 and December 23.

Just 338 of these people were aged 40 to 59, with another 44 aged between 20 and 39, and just six under the age of 19, according to the data.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9090847/Only-377-people-aged-60-no-underlying-health-conditions-died-Covid-UK.html#comments

Dont hold back will you Polly?

Tell it like it is

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"388 people have died under the age of 60 with no underlying conditions ...

The figures show that 1,979 previously healthy people died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 between April 2 and December 23.

Just 338 of these people were aged 40 to 59, with another 44 aged between 20 and 39, and just six under the age of 19, according to the data.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9090847/Only-377-people-aged-60-no-underlying-health-conditions-died-Covid-UK.html#comments

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *lade10000Man
over a year ago

Wiltshire

What is your point OP? That people over 60 don't matter? You, Katie Hopkins and the Daily Mail are truly disgusting and beneath contempt.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
over a year ago

Hastings

"Great. Let's forget social distancing, throw the masks in the bin, forget working from home, don't bother sanitising everywhere you go and let's drive those numbers up.

and cull the over 60's so people can shag strangers again.

But... if you cull the over 60's I can guarantee that in the next set of figures 100% of deaths will be in the under 60's group

Oh crikey you're right. That won't go down well...."

Yes But if you just cull 50% of the population you might slow the speed of transition by 50%

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *hil_SW19Man
over a year ago

Raynes Park

"388 people have died under the age of 60 with no underlying conditions ...

The figures show that 1,979 previously healthy people died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 between April 2 and December 23.

Just 338 of these people were aged 40 to 59, with another 44 aged between 20 and 39, and just six under the age of 19, according to the data.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9090847/Only-377-people-aged-60-no-underlying-health-conditions-died-Covid-UK.html#comments"

Completely debunkted :

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/coronavirus-disinformation_uk_5fe848f7c5b6e1ce833a20de

People pushing this are happy with genocide of people with disabilities, with cancer, with obesity, with breathing difficulties.

Selfish people who feel they are more important than others.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *olly_chromaticTV/TS
over a year ago

Stockport

One of the most effective ways of slowing the spread of covid would be to conduct a cull of the owners of the Daily Mail and any other rag that promotes this type of lethal misinformation.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral

"388 people have died under the age of 60 with no underlying conditions ...

The figures show that 1,979 previously healthy people died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 between April 2 and December 23.

Just 338 of these people were aged 40 to 59, with another 44 aged between 20 and 39, and just six under the age of 19, according to the data.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9090847/Only-377-people-aged-60-no-underlying-health-conditions-died-Covid-UK.html#comments"
Statistics are basically lies.My maths teacher taught me that when in my teens.

Reason statistics show what you want them to show.

Best to look at facts

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"388 people have died under the age of 60 with no underlying conditions ...

The figures show that 1,979 previously healthy people died in hospitals in England after testing positive for Covid-19 between April 2 and December 23.

Just 338 of these people were aged 40 to 59, with another 44 aged between 20 and 39, and just six under the age of 19, according to the data.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9090847/Only-377-people-aged-60-no-underlying-health-conditions-died-Covid-UK.html#comments"

Fabulous, can you complete the missing statistics from your rather biased presentation:

1) list the “underlying conditions” stats as this accounts for 1/5th of our nation, it would also be stupid to discount someone with minor asmtha, a slight heart murmur etc

2) list those who fall into the surplus deaths as I’m sure you are aware that younger and fitter people tend to hang in longer therefore rarely die within the reporting 28 days.

3) list the number of suspected long covid sufferers in the U.K, as this is well into the 100,000’s now and dare I say quite a significant consideration.

4) list the numbers for this age range who have been admitted into hospital as without this intervention they wouldn’t have survived, it will give you insight into just how fkn dangerous covid-19 is to all.

5) perhaps take time to consider why over 65% of those currently occupying my full to capacity ICU are under this age if as you seem to be suggesting they aren’t an issue?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ab jamesMan
over a year ago

ribble valley