Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Virus |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The now updated projections took deaths from 1500 to 1000, a significant drop but not significant enough to not to do something drastic. " I agree, but the conspiracy nutters unfortunately won't. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Several studies concluded very similar figures and where there was a delta, this was highlighted. The dodgy dossier quote was hugely inflammatory, the data was correct and based upon several key facts and some assumptions, which is how projections are calculated. One of those assumptions was "If nothing is done", this was a correct assumption to use when the study commenced. Something was then done, ie, the tiered lockdowns, this was not included. The now updated projections took deaths from 1500 to 1000, a significant drop but not significant enough to not to do something drastic. " Shame they didnt act 2 weeks ago. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The now updated projections took deaths from 1500 to 1000, a significant drop but not significant enough to not to do something drastic. I agree, but the conspiracy nutters unfortunately won't." Tbf when they use false data to justify something so drastic..Its only right questions should be asked. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Several studies concluded very similar figures and where there was a delta, this was highlighted. The dodgy dossier quote was hugely inflammatory, the data was correct and based upon several key facts and some assumptions, which is how projections are calculated. One of those assumptions was "If nothing is done", this was a correct assumption to use when the study commenced. Something was then done, ie, the tiered lockdowns, this was not included. The now updated projections took deaths from 1500 to 1000, a significant drop but not significant enough to not to do something drastic. " they said the tiers were working - just not quickly enough. It would be interesting to know how much quicker they would have had to work for us to avoid another lockdown | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Tbf when they use false data to justify something so drastic..Its only right questions should be asked." I think it was unintentional. If they wanted to hoodwink us (for reasons I can't even think of), they'd have manufactured some figures that suited the narrative in the space of ten minutes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Tbf when they use false data to justify something so drastic..Its only right questions should be asked. I think it was unintentional. If they wanted to hoodwink us (for reasons I can't even think of), they'd have manufactured some figures that suited the narrative in the space of ten minutes." Even so. You would have thought they would have made sure they got their figures right. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Tbf when they use false data to justify something so drastic..Its only right questions should be asked. I think it was unintentional. If they wanted to hoodwink us (for reasons I can't even think of), they'd have manufactured some figures that suited the narrative in the space of ten minutes. Even so. You would have thought they would have made sure they got their figures right." Yep. They did themselves no favours. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
