FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Virus

Is it really down to pubs and restaurants ?

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Or do Whitty and Vallance have their own agenda ?

Telegraph says figures indicate home contacts are much more important for spreading the virus.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/pubs-restaurants-really-driving-rise-165308606.html

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I got a forum ban for posting a link the other day so I'm been careful.

Sadly no the data shows the hospitality sector in total is responsible for only 3% of transmission.

KJ

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riar BelisseWoman
over a year ago

Delightful Bliss

If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex..... "

But do you understand that all of the hospitality sector including Pubs, restaurants, hotels etc account for just 3% of covid incidents.

Lets put that into perspective.

The Education Sector which includes schools, Universities and colleges are responsible for approx 50% of covid incidents.

Even our supposed super safe workplaces account for 20-25% of covid incidents.

The government is beating down on the pubs because it knows economy wise and public opinion they can't touch the education sector or normal workplaces.

Oh I don't drink or go to the pub.

KJ Mr

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex..... "

Exactly...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

The government are scratching to try and find some data to justify the ten pm closure and now the full closure of pubs, part of the presentation to Northern MPs was a survey of less than 200 people taken 3 month ago in the states..

And the new data is at odds with the track and trace data..

They are digging holes..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I've not seen published evidence and certainly not for the 10pm curfew. They must be forced to do this before changes.

Clearly little the USA and UK governments have done has close to appropriate but we should not let their past failures stop us from researching new evidence before new changes are implemented

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral


"If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex..... "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *anna Needs CockWoman
over a year ago

Shrewsbury

Its amazing what conspiracy theories people want to believe when their personal agenda is to go to the pub and get blathered till midnight.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Or do Whitty and Vallance have their own agenda ?

"

What in the world could be Whitty and Vallances agenda?

What could they possibly gain from an agenda?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lik and PaulCouple
over a year ago

cahoots

It's not down to Whitty, Vallance, pubs or restaurants....it's down to people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Totally agree it is down to the public. Be responsible to yourself family and others. However I do not think this site should have political issues really.. We all need to lighten up a little and realise it will go on for much longer.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ty31Man
over a year ago

NW London


"Its amazing what conspiracy theories people want to believe when their personal agenda is to go to the pub and get blathered till midnight. "

Or maybe it's because they are concerned for their jobs, their families jobs and their friends jobs? Decimating the hospitality industry doesn't just cause job losses in pubs, bars and restaurants but across a wide range of businesses and industries.

Maybe it's because people are sick of having their freedoms and liberties ripped away from them with no tangible benefit and on the back of shoddy, unreliable and non-resistant scientific basis.

Also consider this, while the the government takes a sledgehammer to thousands and thousands of livlihoods MPs are now in line for a 3k pay increase each. We're all in this together ain't we?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Its amazing what conspiracy theories people want to believe when their personal agenda is to go to the pub and get blathered till midnight.

Or maybe it's because they are concerned for their jobs, their families jobs and their friends jobs? Decimating the hospitality industry doesn't just cause job losses in pubs, bars and restaurants but across a wide range of businesses and industries.

Maybe it's because people are sick of having their freedoms and liberties ripped away from them with no tangible benefit and on the back of shoddy, unreliable and non-resistant scientific basis.

Also consider this, while the the government takes a sledgehammer to thousands and thousands of livlihoods MPs are now in line for a 3k pay increase each. We're all in this together ain't we? "

Could not agree more, it is across all industry and livlyhoods, everyone will feel a strain. MPs are human too and realiity is they look after their own back irrespective of which party Therefore we should all do the same but with respect for others. Power to the people I say

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I feel more at risk in supermarkets. Gone are the days of queuing to get in.

Out of the 400k plus cases not heard of one supermarket closing because of an outbreak. So you are telling me none of those 400k work in a supermarket?

Yet there's multiple pubs closing per week to deep clean due to an outbreak

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iddle ManMan
over a year ago

Walsall

From the table of contacts and the tracers, the pub or restaurant was the most listed places people with covid had been in the last 5 days.

I'm not sure about the most, but it must be something to do with not having to wear a mask at these places for long periods of time with a lot of strangers in the same rooms. Plus the fact people get smashed and forget all the rules.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eah BabyCouple
over a year ago

Cheshire, Windermere ,Cumbria


"I feel more at risk in supermarkets. Gone are the days of queuing to get in.

Out of the 400k plus cases not heard of one supermarket closing because of an outbreak. So you are telling me none of those 400k work in a supermarket?

Yet there's multiple pubs closing per week to deep clean due to an outbreak "

I had to queue last weekend at the supermarket, they had a trolley queue and a basket queue, for ten minutes they only let the trolley queue enter leaving all those in the basket queue standing in the rain, when we I got inside the supermarket was really empty other than those with a trolley queuing up the aisle for trolley tills

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eah BabyCouple
over a year ago

Cheshire, Windermere ,Cumbria


"From the table of contacts and the tracers, the pub or restaurant was the most listed places people with covid had been in the last 5 days.

I'm not sure about the most, but it must be something to do with not having to wear a mask at these places for long periods of time with a lot of strangers in the same rooms. Plus the fact people get smashed and forget all the rules.

"

Pubs and restaurants will be most listed as they take people’s contact details, the supermarket doesn’t.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Or do Whitty and Vallance have their own agenda ?

Telegraph says figures indicate home contacts are much more important for spreading the virus.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/pubs-restaurants-really-driving-rise-165308606.html "

This is nothing to do with transmission. It's all about instilling fear to drive compliance.

People had become too relaxed for their liking, they were starting to ask awkward questions and demand answers that the government don't want to give. Worse, they were starting to actually see through the nonsense and realise that the whole thing's been blown way out of proportion.

Solutjon... make life feel scary again. Close the pubs, make people wait in the rain outside shops again, make them feel uneasy..

It's nonsense. There's virtually no evidence that's been released showimg hospitality is the source of the problem, if indeed there is actually a problem at all. Infections may be up, but mortality remains low, hospital occupancy remains low & there's no reason to think there will be anything like the impact we saw in March.

There will, obviously, be an impact. Will it be enough to justify yet another round of lockdowns.. I don't think so.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eddy and legsCouple
over a year ago

the wetlands


"Or do Whitty and Vallance have their own agenda ?

"

Of course they do

They're trying to save a bunch of dumbfucks from infecting the rest of us

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ch WellMan
over a year ago

Scotland


"Its amazing what conspiracy theories people want to believe when their personal agenda is to go to the pub and get blathered till midnight.

Or maybe it's because they are concerned for their jobs, their families jobs and their friends jobs? Decimating the hospitality industry doesn't just cause job losses in pubs, bars and restaurants but across a wide range of businesses and industries.

Maybe it's because people are sick of having their freedoms and liberties ripped away from them with no tangible benefit and on the back of shoddy, unreliable and non-resistant scientific basis.

Also consider this, while the the government takes a sledgehammer to thousands and thousands of livlihoods MPs are now in line for a 3k pay increase each. We're all in this together ain't we? "

Exactly. Far too many folk ready to dismiss pubs as somewhere alkys go to get pissed. For starters alkys don't tend to go to pubs, folk seeking social interaction do. Pub staff also go there of course and among other depending on a pub are brewery staff, beer mat makers, the boy who services the pumps, the guy who supplies the fruit machine, the guy who supplies the crisps and nuts, the guy who takes the empty bottles away. I could go on and and on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *udistcpl1Couple
over a year ago

Wirral


"Or do Whitty and Vallance have their own agenda ?

Telegraph says figures indicate home contacts are much more important for spreading the virus.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/pubs-restaurants-really-driving-rise-165308606.html

This is nothing to do with transmission. It's all about instilling fear to drive compliance.

People had become too relaxed for their liking, they were starting to ask awkward questions and demand answers that the government don't want to give. Worse, they were starting to actually see through the nonsense and realise that the whole thing's been blown way out of proportion.

Solutjon... make life feel scary again. Close the pubs, make people wait in the rain outside shops again, make them feel uneasy..

It's nonsense. There's virtually no evidence that's been released showimg hospitality is the source of the problem, if indeed there is actually a problem at all. Infections may be up, but mortality remains low, hospital occupancy remains low & there's no reason to think there will be anything like the impact we saw in March.

There will, obviously, be an impact. Will it be enough to justify yet another round of lockdowns.. I don't think so."

I guess you were off for all of your maths lessons in school.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I think we need a new forum sub-forum, for all of the very many topics that are posted that are akin to deniers, who want to ignore reality.

People could earn the right to carry on as they want, if they volunteer for 6 months to a year, providing therapeutic care for the infected in India and those without healthcare in the USA etc. Massage is needed by these people, amongst other therapies.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I guess you were off for all of your maths lessons in school. "

No, I wasn't. Thanks for the insult though, I'll add it to my collection.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he shaggersCouple
over a year ago

vancouver island

Not saying i think this is the thing to do BUT how many would go along with the government having no restrictions and when the hospitals are full just send people home and let it run it's course

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riar BelisseWoman
over a year ago

Delightful Bliss


"If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex.....

But do you understand that all of the hospitality sector including Pubs, restaurants, hotels etc account for just 3% of covid incidents.

Lets put that into perspective.

The Education Sector which includes schools, Universities and colleges are responsible for approx 50% of covid incidents.

Even our supposed super safe workplaces account for 20-25% of covid incidents.

The government is beating down on the pubs because it knows economy wise and public opinion they can't touch the education sector or normal workplaces.

Oh I don't drink or go to the pub.

KJ Mr"

Nor do I at the moment...

I see your point but statistically wise are those figures from track n trace, for example did the student catch sars-cov-2 then test positive at uni and its placed as a uni contact incident when infact the transmission was elsewhere and I don't mean caught just from the hospitality sector

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"Or do Whitty and Vallance have their own agenda ?

Telegraph says figures indicate home contacts are much more important for spreading the virus.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/pubs-restaurants-really-driving-rise-165308606.html

This is nothing to do with transmission. It's all about instilling fear to drive compliance.

People had become too relaxed for their liking, they were starting to ask awkward questions and demand answers that the government don't want to give. Worse, they were starting to actually see through the nonsense and realise that the whole thing's been blown way out of proportion.

Solutjon... make life feel scary again. Close the pubs, make people wait in the rain outside shops again, make them feel uneasy..

It's nonsense. There's virtually no evidence that's been released showimg hospitality is the source of the problem, if indeed there is actually a problem at all. Infections may be up, but mortality remains low, hospital occupancy remains low & there's no reason to think there will be anything like the impact we saw in March.

There will, obviously, be an impact. Will it be enough to justify yet another round of lockdowns.. I don't think so."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Let's face it,the Government are grabbing at straws.The testing has been ,at best,poor.From Boris saying 'we would be world leaders in testing 'Its been one disaster after another.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riar BelisseWoman
over a year ago

Delightful Bliss


"Let's face it,the Government are grabbing at straws.The testing has been ,at best,poor.From Boris saying 'we would be world leaders in testing 'Its been one disaster after another."

We are still 5th in the world for testing thats pretty good don't you think...

China

Usa

India

Russia

Uk

Source worldometer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex.....

But do you understand that all of the hospitality sector including Pubs, restaurants, hotels etc account for just 3% of covid incidents.

Lets put that into perspective.

The Education Sector which includes schools, Universities and colleges are responsible for approx 50% of covid incidents.

Even our supposed super safe workplaces account for 20-25% of covid incidents.

The government is beating down on the pubs because it knows economy wise and public opinion they can't touch the education sector or normal workplaces.

Oh I don't drink or go to the pub.

KJ Mr

Nor do I at the moment...

I see your point but statistically wise are those figures from track n trace, for example did the student catch sars-cov-2 then test positive at uni and its placed as a uni contact incident when infact the transmission was elsewhere and I don't mean caught just from the hospitality sector "

The high numbers in the student population seems to be coming from the spread in shared accodation. It's less clear where the patient zero of the house became infected. I dont have stats to back it up but I do have a son at uni with COVID, who's best mates at uni with COVID and who's girlfriend is at Uni with COVID. All in separate accommodation with several housemates with COVID. I guess it's part of the PLAN

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove and DuckCouple
over a year ago

Between Sheffield & Chesterfield


"Not saying i think this is the thing to do BUT how many would go along with the government having no restrictions and when the hospitals are full just send people home and let it run it's course"

I think it should run its course. Let people get on in life. Wear the mask for shopping etc, but learn to live with it. This country is a shambles now . The government has handled it all wrong from the beginning

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *essie.Woman
over a year ago

Serendipity

When d*unk the public just don’t socially distance. Let’s face it, plenty can’t do it when sober.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he-Hosiery-GentMan
over a year ago

Older Hot Bearded Guy


"Not saying i think this is the thing to do BUT how many would go along with the government having no restrictions and when the hospitals are full just send people home and let it run it's course

I think it should run its course. Let people get on in life. Wear the mask for shopping etc, but learn to live with it. This country is a shambles now . The government has handled it all wrong from the beginning "

I think mask wearing is helping it spread to be honest. Which ironically is a good thing, we need cases rising so it spreads through the population creating immunity, so we can get back to normal. Only realistic way out of this mess.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's not down to Whitty, Vallance, pubs or restaurants....it's down to people."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool

I read somewhere the biggest places for infections were places of employment and schools/university's.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Not saying i think this is the thing to do BUT how many would go along with the government having no restrictions and when the hospitals are full just send people home and let it run it's course"

Many people would be happy with dead bodies piled into mass graves by a dumper truck as long as they can fuck strangers and go to the pub.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL

Perhaps all shops, workplaces etc should require the sign in process as well. We can get the true facts that way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"Or do Whitty and Vallance have their own agenda ?

Telegraph says figures indicate home contacts are much more important for spreading the virus.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/pubs-restaurants-really-driving-rise-165308606.html "

To be fair, the 3% is a bit of a lie... they account for all 3% (the industry's lowest estimate) of cases in the uk, but for 3 months of this time they were all closed.

On the other hand they are being unfairly burdened with controlling the virus. Yes it makes sense to restrict random people intermingling, but if restrictions are needed, then it should be everywhere... and if places can be exempt from restrictions because they can prove themselves to be "made safe" then all industries should have the right to do that.

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *llabouttheladyMan
over a year ago

Wakefield

[Removed by poster at 10/10/20 09:41:11]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *llabouttheladyMan
over a year ago

Wakefield

Check out the flu report from last week, week 40

On page 2 it details outbreaks v Covid cases in primary care.

Nursing homes, education settings and workplaces top the pile. It ain’t pubs and restaurants, just as it wasn’t in August and early September.

It’s the kids

And ironically we are about to start phase 3 vaccination testing next week, without a virus in society how can we test it?

Back in August the experts were saying the virus was too low to challenge any vaccination.

Come on...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex..... "

agreed

i also dont understand the logic of these hidden agenda theories

so this hidden agenda to close the pubs one ... lets shut down an economy, have to pay more furlough, or bail outs or when they lose their jobs pay benefits... alcohol is one of the most heavily taxed items in the uk and that revenue stream is now gone ... so what is this hidden agenda?

another “hidden agenda” is apparently cases rising since they told us to wear masks (as though people think the masks are causing the increase) ... if the agenda was to increase cases you would just let people roam free and the virus would be rampant ... no extra scheming required

personally i dont think we have hidden agendas... just fools agendas ... the fools being the government for thinking the british people would follow a set of guidelines and the other fools being the ones circumventing them for not realising it just results in harsher and harsher rules being laid on top

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"Check out the flu report from last week, week 40

On page 2 it details outbreaks v Covid cases in primary care.

Nursing homes, education settings and workplaces top the pile. It ain’t pubs and restaurants, just as it wasn’t in August and early September.

It’s the kids

And ironically we are about to start phase 3 vaccination testing next week, without a virus in society how can we test it?

Back in August the experts were saying the virus was too low to challenge any vaccination.

Come on..."

It was announced earlier this week, that covid-19 was responsible for more deaths than Flu & Pneumonia combined this year so far... although flu season will start again soon.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex.....

agreed

i also dont understand the logic of these hidden agenda theories

so this hidden agenda to close the pubs one ... lets shut down an economy, have to pay more furlough, or bail outs or when they lose their jobs pay benefits... alcohol is one of the most heavily taxed items in the uk and that revenue stream is now gone ... so what is this hidden agenda?

another “hidden agenda” is apparently cases rising since they told us to wear masks (as though people think the masks are causing the increase) ... if the agenda was to increase cases you would just let people roam free and the virus would be rampant ... no extra scheming required

personally i dont think we have hidden agendas... just fools agendas ... the fools being the government for thinking the british people would follow a set of guidelines and the other fools being the ones circumventing them for not realising it just results in harsher and harsher rules being laid on top"

I dont agree with hidden agendas..but..its clear the cases are going up due to schools/unis and workplace.

So why are pubs being targeted?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"Check out the flu report from last week, week 40

On page 2 it details outbreaks v Covid cases in primary care.

Nursing homes, education settings and workplaces top the pile. It ain’t pubs and restaurants, just as it wasn’t in August and early September.

It’s the kids

And ironically we are about to start phase 3 vaccination testing next week, without a virus in society how can we test it?

Back in August the experts were saying the virus was too low to challenge any vaccination.

Come on..."

The concept that the virus is being manipulated to allow for testing vaccines is just hilarious. You do know that they don't just vaccinate their subjects and send them to the pub to try & catch it... the scientists will have controlled virus samples to infect their subjects with.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eddy and legsCouple
over a year ago

the wetlands


"

Back in August the experts were saying the virus was too low to challenge any vaccination.

"

You need to keep up ... This is OCTOBER !!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex.....

agreed

i also dont understand the logic of these hidden agenda theories

so this hidden agenda to close the pubs one ... lets shut down an economy, have to pay more furlough, or bail outs or when they lose their jobs pay benefits... alcohol is one of the most heavily taxed items in the uk and that revenue stream is now gone ... so what is this hidden agenda?

another “hidden agenda” is apparently cases rising since they told us to wear masks (as though people think the masks are causing the increase) ... if the agenda was to increase cases you would just let people roam free and the virus would be rampant ... no extra scheming required

personally i dont think we have hidden agendas... just fools agendas ... the fools being the government for thinking the british people would follow a set of guidelines and the other fools being the ones circumventing them for not realising it just results in harsher and harsher rules being laid on top

I dont agree with hidden agendas..but..its clear the cases are going up due to schools/unis and workplace.

So why are pubs being targeted?"

i don't attend cabinet meetings but my guess would be

1. covid need interaction to spread , cases are rising so we currently have too many interactions

2. yep unis have been a cause of the spread (although realistically it probably was introduced to halls from a pub visit and then went rampant round the shared living and parties) but these people have already paid for their courses, and signed up to annual rent agreements and classes have started and its all gone too far to pull it back now without the absolute shit storm we would get if they cancelled the entire academic year

3. so we need to looks at another source of reducing interactions ... where else are people meeting up with folk from outside their household? pubs! couple that with the fact people arent as good at social distancing once they are pissed and their inhibitions come down, restrictions can be dialled up or down as and when needed without committing now to a decision for the whole year too ... so just now its a curfew, then it might be a 2 week close down, then it might be open again food only no alcohol ... its much more flexible restrictions than closing unis

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex.....

agreed

i also dont understand the logic of these hidden agenda theories

so this hidden agenda to close the pubs one ... lets shut down an economy, have to pay more furlough, or bail outs or when they lose their jobs pay benefits... alcohol is one of the most heavily taxed items in the uk and that revenue stream is now gone ... so what is this hidden agenda?

another “hidden agenda” is apparently cases rising since they told us to wear masks (as though people think the masks are causing the increase) ... if the agenda was to increase cases you would just let people roam free and the virus would be rampant ... no extra scheming required

personally i dont think we have hidden agendas... just fools agendas ... the fools being the government for thinking the british people would follow a set of guidelines and the other fools being the ones circumventing them for not realising it just results in harsher and harsher rules being laid on top

I dont agree with hidden agendas..but..its clear the cases are going up due to schools/unis and workplace.

So why are pubs being targeted?

i don't attend cabinet meetings but my guess would be

1. covid need interaction to spread , cases are rising so we currently have too many interactions

2. yep unis have been a cause of the spread (although realistically it probably was introduced to halls from a pub visit and then went rampant round the shared living and parties) but these people have already paid for their courses, and signed up to annual rent agreements and classes have started and its all gone too far to pull it back now without the absolute shit storm we would get if they cancelled the entire academic year

3. so we need to looks at another source of reducing interactions ... where else are people meeting up with folk from outside their household? pubs! couple that with the fact people arent as good at social distancing once they are pissed and their inhibitions come down, restrictions can be dialled up or down as and when needed without committing now to a decision for the whole year too ... so just now its a curfew, then it might be a 2 week close down, then it might be open again food only no alcohol ... its much more flexible restrictions than closing unis "

I know its anecdotal but the 2 times I've been out ,the pubs have been quiet quiet and the strict measures were adhered too.

Obviously I cant speak for everywhere but I think this narrative that everyone is blatantly ignoring the rules is skewed.

I do think it's more of a case that they cant really go after schools or places of work and they have to be seen to be doing something.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex.....

agreed

i also dont understand the logic of these hidden agenda theories

so this hidden agenda to close the pubs one ... lets shut down an economy, have to pay more furlough, or bail outs or when they lose their jobs pay benefits... alcohol is one of the most heavily taxed items in the uk and that revenue stream is now gone ... so what is this hidden agenda?

another “hidden agenda” is apparently cases rising since they told us to wear masks (as though people think the masks are causing the increase) ... if the agenda was to increase cases you would just let people roam free and the virus would be rampant ... no extra scheming required

personally i dont think we have hidden agendas... just fools agendas ... the fools being the government for thinking the british people would follow a set of guidelines and the other fools being the ones circumventing them for not realising it just results in harsher and harsher rules being laid on top

I dont agree with hidden agendas..but..its clear the cases are going up due to schools/unis and workplace.

So why are pubs being targeted?

i don't attend cabinet meetings but my guess would be

1. covid need interaction to spread , cases are rising so we currently have too many interactions

2. yep unis have been a cause of the spread (although realistically it probably was introduced to halls from a pub visit and then went rampant round the shared living and parties) but these people have already paid for their courses, and signed up to annual rent agreements and classes have started and its all gone too far to pull it back now without the absolute shit storm we would get if they cancelled the entire academic year

3. so we need to looks at another source of reducing interactions ... where else are people meeting up with folk from outside their household? pubs! couple that with the fact people arent as good at social distancing once they are pissed and their inhibitions come down, restrictions can be dialled up or down as and when needed without committing now to a decision for the whole year too ... so just now its a curfew, then it might be a 2 week close down, then it might be open again food only no alcohol ... its much more flexible restrictions than closing unis

I know its anecdotal but the 2 times I've been out ,the pubs have been quiet quiet and the strict measures were adhered too.

Obviously I cant speak for everywhere but I think this narrative that everyone is blatantly ignoring the rules is skewed.

I do think it's more of a case that they cant really go after schools or places of work and they have to be seen to be doing something. "

Same here the 3 times I have been out for a meal it has been really quiet and everyone was following the guidelines.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"Or do Whitty and Vallance have their own agenda ?

Telegraph says figures indicate home contacts are much more important for spreading the virus.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/pubs-restaurants-really-driving-rise-165308606.html

This is nothing to do with transmission. It's all about instilling fear to drive compliance.

People had become too relaxed for their liking, they were starting to ask awkward questions and demand answers that the government don't want to give. Worse, they were starting to actually see through the nonsense and realise that the whole thing's been blown way out of proportion.

Solutjon... make life feel scary again. Close the pubs, make people wait in the rain outside shops again, make them feel uneasy..

It's nonsense. There's virtually no evidence that's been released showimg hospitality is the source of the problem, if indeed there is actually a problem at all. Infections may be up, but mortality remains low, hospital occupancy remains low & there's no reason to think there will be anything like the impact we saw in March.

There will, obviously, be an impact. Will it be enough to justify yet another round of lockdowns.. I don't think so."

tell that to the doctors and nurses who,s hospitals are filling up again.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"Not saying i think this is the thing to do BUT how many would go along with the government having no restrictions and when the hospitals are full just send people home and let it run it's course"

I certainly would not. They have done badly, much worse than was reasonable for us to have expected. We're a very wealthy nation and can afford to do it right, putting people as the priority.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I think we need a full lockdown, as we had in the spring - not that it was as complete as in other countries. I think it's probably the only way to make a substantial reduction in the numbers. It needs test and tracing to be working though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think we need a full lockdown, as we had in the spring - not that it was as complete as in other countries. I think it's probably the only way to make a substantial reduction in the numbers. It needs test and tracing to be working though "

On 67 % of my basic wage ?

That wouldn't work for me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Please remember how useless this Tory government has been when you are next going to vote.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Please remember how useless this Tory government has been when you are next going to vote."

I am a floating voter so who should I vote for ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex.....

agreed

i also dont understand the logic of these hidden agenda theories

so this hidden agenda to close the pubs one ... lets shut down an economy, have to pay more furlough, or bail outs or when they lose their jobs pay benefits... alcohol is one of the most heavily taxed items in the uk and that revenue stream is now gone ... so what is this hidden agenda?

another “hidden agenda” is apparently cases rising since they told us to wear masks (as though people think the masks are causing the increase) ... if the agenda was to increase cases you would just let people roam free and the virus would be rampant ... no extra scheming required

personally i dont think we have hidden agendas... just fools agendas ... the fools being the government for thinking the british people would follow a set of guidelines and the other fools being the ones circumventing them for not realising it just results in harsher and harsher rules being laid on top

I dont agree with hidden agendas..but..its clear the cases are going up due to schools/unis and workplace.

So why are pubs being targeted?

i don't attend cabinet meetings but my guess would be

1. covid need interaction to spread , cases are rising so we currently have too many interactions

2. yep unis have been a cause of the spread (although realistically it probably was introduced to halls from a pub visit and then went rampant round the shared living and parties) but these people have already paid for their courses, and signed up to annual rent agreements and classes have started and its all gone too far to pull it back now without the absolute shit storm we would get if they cancelled the entire academic year

3. so we need to looks at another source of reducing interactions ... where else are people meeting up with folk from outside their household? pubs! couple that with the fact people arent as good at social distancing once they are pissed and their inhibitions come down, restrictions can be dialled up or down as and when needed without committing now to a decision for the whole year too ... so just now its a curfew, then it might be a 2 week close down, then it might be open again food only no alcohol ... its much more flexible restrictions than closing unis

I know its anecdotal but the 2 times I've been out ,the pubs have been quiet quiet and the strict measures were adhered too.

Obviously I cant speak for everywhere but I think this narrative that everyone is blatantly ignoring the rules is skewed.

I do think it's more of a case that they cant really go after schools or places of work and they have to be seen to be doing something. "

i agree partly with the fact they cant go after schools and workplaces ... its about what we need (education and income) for a while rather than what we want (social interaction)

but i dont agree with them just needing to be SEEN to do something ... i dont think its just visual , opportunities for interaction need cut somewhere

also without trying to be rude i promise .., do you think that at 48 you maybe choose a different kind of drinking establishments from the young crowd and thats why your anecdotal experience is different from the demographic where it is most spreading at the moment? i might be wrong but would assume you are past the phase in life where everything revolves around a party and “the sesh” ... thats shown by the fact you gave only been out twice

you likely have a massively different mentality from many (not all) people in a much younger life stage and if follows your behaviour around how much you drink snd actions when d*unk would be hugely different too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool

I am slightly offended.

I go where all the hip cool cats go.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If people went to a pub, socially distanced and washed/sanitised hands, sat down with mates and had a few pints, said goodbye, left the pub and went straight home then it would be fine but....

They have a few too many, leave the pub and hug, kiss, crowd together, fight, fall over in the street, cry because all is wrong in the world and go home with each other for sex.....

agreed

i also dont understand the logic of these hidden agenda theories

so this hidden agenda to close the pubs one ... lets shut down an economy, have to pay more furlough, or bail outs or when they lose their jobs pay benefits... alcohol is one of the most heavily taxed items in the uk and that revenue stream is now gone ... so what is this hidden agenda?

another “hidden agenda” is apparently cases rising since they told us to wear masks (as though people think the masks are causing the increase) ... if the agenda was to increase cases you would just let people roam free and the virus would be rampant ... no extra scheming required

personally i dont think we have hidden agendas... just fools agendas ... the fools being the government for thinking the british people would follow a set of guidelines and the other fools being the ones circumventing them for not realising it just results in harsher and harsher rules being laid on top

I dont agree with hidden agendas..but..its clear the cases are going up due to schools/unis and workplace.

So why are pubs being targeted?

i don't attend cabinet meetings but my guess would be

1. covid need interaction to spread , cases are rising so we currently have too many interactions

2. yep unis have been a cause of the spread (although realistically it probably was introduced to halls from a pub visit and then went rampant round the shared living and parties) but these people have already paid for their courses, and signed up to annual rent agreements and classes have started and its all gone too far to pull it back now without the absolute shit storm we would get if they cancelled the entire academic year

3. so we need to looks at another source of reducing interactions ... where else are people meeting up with folk from outside their household? pubs! couple that with the fact people arent as good at social distancing once they are pissed and their inhibitions come down, restrictions can be dialled up or down as and when needed without committing now to a decision for the whole year too ... so just now its a curfew, then it might be a 2 week close down, then it might be open again food only no alcohol ... its much more flexible restrictions than closing unis

I know its anecdotal but the 2 times I've been out ,the pubs have been quiet quiet and the strict measures were adhered too.

Obviously I cant speak for everywhere but I think this narrative that everyone is blatantly ignoring the rules is skewed.

I do think it's more of a case that they cant really go after schools or places of work and they have to be seen to be doing something.

i agree partly with the fact they cant go after schools and workplaces ... its about what we need (education and income) for a while rather than what we want (social interaction)

but i dont agree with them just needing to be SEEN to do something ... i dont think its just visual , opportunities for interaction need cut somewhere

also without trying to be rude i promise .., do you think that at 48 you maybe choose a different kind of drinking establishments from the young crowd and thats why your anecdotal experience is different from the demographic where it is most spreading at the moment? i might be wrong but would assume you are past the phase in life where everything revolves around a party and “the sesh” ... thats shown by the fact you gave only been out twice

you likely have a massively different mentality from many (not all) people in a much younger life stage and if follows your behaviour around how much you drink snd actions when d*unk would be hugely different too "

I cant help but agree with most things you say.

Yes at my age I dont usually go where the younger ones drink unless me and the wife are away for the weekend or away on holiday.

So in main everyone where we eat out are well behaved and follow the guidelines.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I am slightly offended.

I go where all the hip cool cats go.

"

Only on holiday when we feel young

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

i was out probably 4/5 times a week in august and for the most part following the rules (we sometimes had more than 3 households at a table but not more than 6 in total)

some places were great ... others not really paying much attention to the rules ... some places group all following them, some groups not

in city centres its generally book a table for 2 hours then move on which again drives up interactions because you are in 4 pubs in a day instead of 1 ... and as the night goes on it definitely gets more lax ... elbow bumps become high 5s and hugs goodnight, 1m becomes 30 cm ...

its not the pubs faults at all, they are just falling victim to being the location all the socialising was going on

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I am slightly offended.

I go where all the hip cool cats go.

"

sorry . but you get my point of why you might not have witnessed it right?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"I am slightly offended.

I go where all the hip cool cats go.

sorry . but you get my point of why you might not have witnessed it right? "

I'm off out for a game of dominoes tonight.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I am slightly offended.

I go where all the hip cool cats go.

sorry . but you get my point of why you might not have witnessed it right?

I'm off out for a game of dominoes tonight."

aha ... nothing wrong with a game of dominos but i wasn't even suggesting that extreme

there is still a big difference between a fairly quiet local, or even a mid price restaurant ... and a city centre shots based bar running freshers nights

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"I am slightly offended.

I go where all the hip cool cats go.

sorry . but you get my point of why you might not have witnessed it right?

I'm off out for a game of dominoes tonight.

aha ... nothing wrong with a game of dominos but i wasn't even suggesting that extreme

there is still a big difference between a fairly quiet local, or even a mid price restaurant ... and a city centre shots based bar running freshers nights "

But that's linked to universities and keeping them lock downed is clearly creating more problems?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The main problem is that people don’t do what they say they would do - less than 20% of people with symptoms actually isolate and just over 10% do if they’re told that they have been in contact with someone who has tested positive.

There’s loads of different reasons for that but a big one is money - needing to earn - and another big one is the totally confusing messages coming out from gov added to the Cummings debacle.

Check out the Corsair report and the report from the Foresight Group (links below)

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.15.20191957v1.full.pdf

https://www.ntu.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/1177902/NTU-C19-NFG-Report-0920-Communications-and-the-Covid-19-Pandemic-Rapid-Report.pdf

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he-Hosiery-GentMan
over a year ago

Older Hot Bearded Guy


"I think we need a full lockdown, as we had in the spring - not that it was as complete as in other countries. I think it's probably the only way to make a substantial reduction in the numbers. It needs test and tracing to be working though "

A full lockdown. Lol.

Think about it. The countries that had the strictest lockdowns - France & Spain. Their infections have risen. Why do you think this is? Because their population weren’t exposed to the virus back in the Spring... because they were locked down. A lockdown is counter intuitive.

A lockdown is the complete opposite of what you need now. You have to build a level of immunity through a population for this virus to recede.

How much longer before people realise this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Please remember how useless this Tory government has been when you are next going to vote.

I am a floating voter so who should I vote for ?"

Not the Tories.

To be fair you have some very poor options in England, which means the UK has absolutely dire outcomes when it comes to 'Leadership' but surely you all must know the Tories only represent themselves and rich friends.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I am slightly offended.

I go where all the hip cool cats go.

sorry . but you get my point of why you might not have witnessed it right?

I'm off out for a game of dominoes tonight.

aha ... nothing wrong with a game of dominos but i wasn't even suggesting that extreme

there is still a big difference between a fairly quiet local, or even a mid price restaurant ... and a city centre shots based bar running freshers nights

But that's linked to universities and keeping them lock downed is clearly creating more problems?"

its not really, young people will socialise wether they are at college/ work / uni, stayed at home/ moved away ... you don't have to be a student to drink in your late teens/ early twenties

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rambedCouple
over a year ago

Sheffield

[Removed by poster at 10/10/20 14:34:52]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The main problem is that people don’t do what they say they would do - less than 20% of people with symptoms actually isolate and just over 10% do if they’re told that they have been in contact with someone who has tested positive.

There’s loads of different reasons for that but a big one is money - needing to earn - and another big one is the totally confusing messages coming out from gov added to the Cummings debacle.

Check out the Corsair report and the report from the Foresight Group (links below)

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.15.20191957v1.full.pdf

https://www.ntu.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/1177902/NTU-C19-NFG-Report-0920-Communications-and-the-Covid-19-Pandemic-Rapid-Report.pdf

"

i like to think of myself as fairly intelligent so maybe i'm doing a disservice to other people but i dont think people are that thick

you cant tell me honestly that people can't understand the instructions or think dominic cummings is a reason to ignore them ... even with different rules across the country it takes minutes to google and read up on your local ones, and every time you turn on the tv, the radio, social media they are being reminded and clarified on the news + via local govt ads

anyone who still doesn’t understand its because its suits them not to

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hubaysiWoman
over a year ago

Leeds

The virus is everywhere. It’s not pubs and restaurants to blame and the 10pm closure is forcing people to be together more after the pubs have closed! It’s ridiculous.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The virus is everywhere. It’s not pubs and restaurants to blame and the 10pm closure is forcing people to be together more after the pubs have closed! It’s ridiculous. "

its not forcing anything... people should be more than capable of heading hone at 10pm ... if they get together afterwards its completely by choice

why does nobody have any sense of personal accountability for their actions

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hubaysiWoman
over a year ago

Leeds


"The virus is everywhere. It’s not pubs and restaurants to blame and the 10pm closure is forcing people to be together more after the pubs have closed! It’s ridiculous.

its not forcing anything... people should be more than capable of heading hone at 10pm ... if they get together afterwards its completely by choice

why does nobody have any sense of personal accountability for their actions "

Maybe ‘forcing’ was the wrong word to use but people are meeting after the pubs have closed, for some it’s a natural activity.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Please remember how useless this Tory government has been when you are next going to vote.

I am a floating voter so who should I vote for ?

Not the Tories.

To be fair you have some very poor options in England, which means the UK has absolutely dire outcomes when it comes to 'Leadership' but surely you all must know the Tories only represent themselves and rich friends.

"

So who ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich


"The virus is everywhere. It’s not pubs and restaurants to blame and the 10pm closure is forcing people to be together more after the pubs have closed! It’s ridiculous.

its not forcing anything... people should be more than capable of heading hone at 10pm ... if they get together afterwards its completely by choice

why does nobody have any sense of personal accountability for their actions

Maybe ‘forcing’ was the wrong word to use but people are meeting after the pubs have closed, for some it’s a natural activity."

well these people are either extremely thick or do not give a toss about the wider community either way there is no way the government can control that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Please remember how useless this Tory government has been when you are next going to vote.

I am a floating voter so who should I vote for ?

Not the Tories.

To be fair you have some very poor options in England, which means the UK has absolutely dire outcomes when it comes to 'Leadership' but surely you all must know the Tories only represent themselves and rich friends.

So who ?"

If your voting for a ruling government there is only a choice of two parties that will rule come the next election.

One is the Tories and the other is Labour.

Flouting voters must know this surely?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Please remember how useless this Tory government has been when you are next going to vote.

I am a floating voter so who should I vote for ?

Not the Tories.

To be fair you have some very poor options in England, which means the UK has absolutely dire outcomes when it comes to 'Leadership' but surely you all must know the Tories only represent themselves and rich friends.

So who ?

If your voting for a ruling government there is only a choice of two parties that will rule come the next election.

One is the Tories and the other is Labour.

Flouting voters must know this surely?"

Yep both as bad as each other.

Looks like I wont be voting next general election again.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Please remember how useless this Tory government has been when you are next going to vote.

I am a floating voter so who should I vote for ?

Not the Tories.

To be fair you have some very poor options in England, which means the UK has absolutely dire outcomes when it comes to 'Leadership' but surely you all must know the Tories only represent themselves and rich friends.

So who ?

If your voting for a ruling government there is only a choice of two parties that will rule come the next election.

One is the Tories and the other is Labour.

Flouting voters must know this surely?

Yep both as bad as each other.

Looks like I wont be voting next general election again. "

Hey nigel could make a comeback with his new "close our borders party" by then....so dont give up hope just yet

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Please remember how useless this Tory government has been when you are next going to vote.

I am a floating voter so who should I vote for ?

Not the Tories.

To be fair you have some very poor options in England, which means the UK has absolutely dire outcomes when it comes to 'Leadership' but surely you all must know the Tories only represent themselves and rich friends.

So who ?

If your voting for a ruling government there is only a choice of two parties that will rule come the next election.

One is the Tories and the other is Labour.

Flouting voters must know this surely?

Yep both as bad as each other.

Looks like I wont be voting next general election again.

Hey nigel could make a comeback with his new "close our borders party" by then....so dont give up hope just yet "

Hahaha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think we need a full lockdown, as we had in the spring - not that it was as complete as in other countries. I think it's probably the only way to make a substantial reduction in the numbers. It needs test and tracing to be working though "

Do you mean like France and Spain did. Were they needed permission to leave the house.

How are they doing now. Lockdown now and all you’re going to do is push the virus into the winter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"I think we need a full lockdown, as we had in the spring - not that it was as complete as in other countries. I think it's probably the only way to make a substantial reduction in the numbers. It needs test and tracing to be working though

On 67 % of my basic wage ?

That wouldn't work for me."

I'm up for the restrictions on the virus being spread but not a promoter of people being punished for decisions taken by and that benefit the state.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"I think we need a full lockdown, as we had in the spring - not that it was as complete as in other countries. I think it's probably the only way to make a substantial reduction in the numbers. It needs test and tracing to be working though

Do you mean like France and Spain did. Were they needed permission to leave the house.

How are they doing now. Lockdown now and all you’re going to do is push the virus into the winter."

It always depends on what measures are taken in full, rather than 1 isolated element, that may be counteracted by others.

Our largest success here, as well as elsewhere was typically during full or partial lockdown.

If we accept that our health services are unable to cope, managing virus related problems as well as the other health needs that people have, if we get rapid exponential growth in infection levels, then some form of restrictions are necessary. Winter is an especially harsh time for health care, so it's important to minimise the system load that must deal with it. There are a few people who don't want anything done, as long as they can live without any limits, as mad as it is.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *llabouttheladyMan
over a year ago

Wakefield

Agree with that, we simply do not have the capacity within the NHS at the best of time, worse still, the NHS don’t have the staff to cope with the current capacity anyway.

Another lockdown is coming if things carry on as they are, no doubt.

The thing is, going on previous form it’s looking like every time we exit a lockdown and let the fucker go, it will eventually work it’s way back through society and do what it does best.

We are in for a long, shitty autumn/winter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think we need a full lockdown, as we had in the spring - not that it was as complete as in other countries. I think it's probably the only way to make a substantial reduction in the numbers. It needs test and tracing to be working though

On 67 % of my basic wage ?

That wouldn't work for me.

I'm up for the restrictions on the virus being spread but not a promoter of people being punished for decisions taken by and that benefit the state. "

so does that mean in non covid time you are against increasing tax? or do we pick and choose when people receiving less of their wage is punishment?

i dont think a lockdown would be for the benefit of the state ... its for the benefit of your neighbour

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 11/10/20 09:54:17]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Sage has obviously decided what is the price of a human life.

It is the decimation of our hospitality and entertainment industry. They judge that whilst 1 section of the UK population is prepared to enjoy a good night out they are being cold and callous because another much smaller section of the UK population is enjoying a bad night in with a nasty potentially fatal virus.

That is the price of a human life.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *llabouttheladyMan
over a year ago

Wakefield

Going back to the very start of this topic, is it pubs and restaurants?

We’ll soon find out.

I’m no gambling man, but I suspect whilstever tens of thousands of kids mix in schools and colleges on a daily basis, this virus like every other virus will continue to spread, pubs or no pubs.

It’s what kids do best

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

Report in the FT today that 80% of cases here now are a variation which came from Spain in the summer, pretty sure it's safe to say it was bars and clubs etc where the virus was spread then brought back here..

High percentage of cases in other European countries of the same variant..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Report in the FT today that 80% of cases here now are a variation which came from Spain in the summer, pretty sure it's safe to say it was bars and clubs etc where the virus was spread then brought back here..

High percentage of cases in other European countries of the same variant.."

I read about this variant months ago it actually originated in south east Asia.

It is said to be 10 times more infectious but 10 times less lethal.

Which rings true now.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top