FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Virus

Vaccine

Jump to newest
 

By *ornyQueer OP   Woman
over a year ago

.....

Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Seconded. I’m so sick of all this now

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *D835Man
over a year ago

London


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted. "

Fingers Crossed

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it."

I agree with this

I think if the government are expecting a near to 100% take up then they're in for a bit of a shock

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it."

Me either and ive asked plenty of nurses at work too..

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

the problem is most vaccines take at least 10 years to be close to 100% effective.

even the current flu vaccine is only around 48% effective so any covid-19 vaccine (that has been rushed) cannot achieve a high rate of success.

lets say they get a vaccine out in jan and say they want to have everyone injected with it by easter.

you would need to inject 600,000 people a week and you must be dreaming if you think they can produce and treat that many people each week.

the governments view is a vaccine over or close to 50% successful is acceptable. but acceptable to who? and what about the people how have a bad reaction to it.

you will not be able to sue because they will legally cover that so you may end up with people suffering serious side effects that are life changing with little chance of any quality of life or care.

when you have clowns in charge you get a circus. they dont know what that are doing from one week to the next and your going to let them inject you with something that has not been throughly tested or can achieve a a close to 100% safe rate.

the current death rate from covid-19 is less than people who die from cigarette annually but they are still on the shelves.

we need to exercise caution.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

A vaccine, on it's own, will not end the restrictions. It's highly likely that even if a vaccine is found restrictions will continue for several years - if we let them.

Why?

1 - Availability.

There is unlikely to be sufficient vaccine for a mass vaccination program for several months at least & possibly considerably longer. The most at risk will be vaccinated first but that leaves the rest of the country in limbo.

2 - Resources

There are already questions being asked about the logistics of storing, distributing and administering vaccine on the scale required. It's never been done and there is as yet no sign of the planning needed to actually accomplish it.

3 - Efficacy

There's no information yet on how effective a covid vaccine may be or how long the protection provided lasts. Best guesses are around 50 - 60% effective and protection for between 6 and 12 months. Both of those point to mass vaccination being a long-term logistical nightmare.

4 - Uptake

To produce 'herd immunity' we'd need vaccination levels of between 60 & 80% of the population. Given the growing level of resistance to vaccination it's highly likely we won't reach those numbers.

All of those things point to vaccination being far from the magic bullet to end this. The ONLY way it will end is when we as a population decide it needs to end and accept that, as with every other illness, there will be a price to pay.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eeker of truthMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me either and ive asked plenty of nurses at work too.. "

Same here.

None of my friends or my family that i have asked will be taking a vaccine.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eeker of truthMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"the problem is most vaccines take at least 10 years to be close to 100% effective.

even the current flu vaccine is only around 48% effective so any covid-19 vaccine (that has been rushed) cannot achieve a high rate of success.

lets say they get a vaccine out in jan and say they want to have everyone injected with it by easter.

you would need to inject 600,000 people a week and you must be dreaming if you think they can produce and treat that many people each week.

the governments view is a vaccine over or close to 50% successful is acceptable. but acceptable to who? and what about the people how have a bad reaction to it.

you will not be able to sue because they will legally cover that so you may end up with people suffering serious side effects that are life changing with little chance of any quality of life or care.

when you have clowns in charge you get a circus. they dont know what that are doing from one week to the next and your going to let them inject you with something that has not been throughly tested or can achieve a a close to 100% safe rate.

the current death rate from covid-19 is less than people who die from cigarette annually but they are still on the shelves.

we need to exercise caution."

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

cant even get an antibody test never mind a vaccine

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

Straw poll at work hardly anyone is bothered about getting the vaccine.

What I found surprising it was the older ones who were against it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich

If its an effective vaccine there is enough to go round and everyone has a chance of getting one i see no need for restrictions.If people dont want to be vaccinated thats up to them but dont expect everyone who has to carry on being restricted.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"the problem is most vaccines take at least 10 years to be close to 100% effective.

even the current flu vaccine is only around 48% effective so any covid-19 vaccine (that has been rushed) cannot achieve a high rate of success.

lets say they get a vaccine out in jan and say they want to have everyone injected with it by easter.

you would need to inject 600,000 people a week and you must be dreaming if you think they can produce and treat that many people each week.

the governments view is a vaccine over or close to 50% successful is acceptable. but acceptable to who? and what about the people how have a bad reaction to it.

you will not be able to sue because they will legally cover that so you may end up with people suffering serious side effects that are life changing with little chance of any quality of life or care.

when you have clowns in charge you get a circus. they dont know what that are doing from one week to the next and your going to let them inject you with something that has not been throughly tested or can achieve a a close to 100% safe rate.

the current death rate from covid-19 is less than people who die from cigarette annually but they are still on the shelves.

we need to exercise caution."

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral


"Seconded. I’m so sick of all this now "
Know how you feel

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eddy and legsCouple
over a year ago

the wetlands


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted. "

A better solution would be to educate the idiots but a vaccine is more likely at this stage.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ike4362ukMan
over a year ago

Cheshunt

I work in the industry. Some of our machines are used in the research into Covid and in the manufacturing process.

Not taking a vaccine that has passed all of the testing is just stupid and is a result of scaremongering. The reason these vaccines have come to testing early is that there was already pre-existing studies into SARS and MERS. They are still going through the full three phases of testing.

The companies ARE liable for any issues after certification. The companies only have cover if the Government choose to force them to issue it before certification. This was done for the Ebola vaccine because the lethality of that disease made the early release ethical.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted. "

I wholeheartedly agree, but unfortunately there is unlikely to be a vaccine until the new-year.

Cal

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West

I'd suggest a Google search for the headline "Vaccinating all of UK ‘not going to happen’, says task force head" which is in the Financial Times. I don't dare link here.

Overview: any vaccine is aimed at the over 50s only, prioritising care and health workers and the most vulnerable in the over 50 age bracket. No under 18s will be vaccinated; its an adult only thing anyway. The Govt is ordering 30m doses of whatever works, that's enough for the over 50s.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 05/10/20 01:42:11]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"[Removed by poster at 05/10/20 01:42:11]"

Can of worms I regretted opening

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lirtymr_mrsCouple
over a year ago

Stockton-on-Tees


"I'd suggest a Google search for the headline "Vaccinating all of UK ‘not going to happen’, says task force head" which is in the Financial Times. I don't dare link here.

Overview: any vaccine is aimed at the over 50s only, prioritising care and health workers and the most vulnerable in the over 50 age bracket. No under 18s will be vaccinated; its an adult only thing anyway. The Govt is ordering 30m doses of whatever works, that's enough for the over 50s."

I saw the same, but haven't seen it in any other media (I do trust the FT).

I think when it becomes more general knowledge it will alter people's attitude to lockdown rule adherence, how they feel about their own sacrifices over the last 6 months and what exiting covid looks like for them.

Basically the most in need will get a vaccine (good science). But the most economically impacted just have to keep sacrificing until everyone but them gets a vaccine, then they can have govt permission to go get ill. (Bad PR for the govt, rough deal for those already feeling trodden on) it's going to make a lot of people mad/sad.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This all makes perfect sense and I agree to a point what the Op has said. However when it's your mum or dad or grandmother or grand father exposed and heaven forbid pass Way as we have let it take its course its then that this idea takes the form. Of a bitter pill to swallow.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *tace 309TV/TS
over a year ago

durham

I wouldn't hold hoping for a, successful vaccine in this, country with this government. They can't get anything right. Now, we, learn there's be a, hitch with the positive testing figures. Over 15000 people who tested positive fell through the net. The figures, are a shambles. How many more, people have these 15000 been in contact with and possibly infected. Is this government trying to get to the figures the doomsday pair predicted deliberately to save face for those two. The, whole thing is a fiasco. What will weasel Hancock have to say this afternoon in Parliament as he has been called in to explain exactly what is going on here,

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The whole thing is a fiasco.

Restrictions to 'control the virus until we get a vaccine' and now we hear that most of the population won't, in fact, get a vaccine.

'World beating testing', except we can't count the results.

Useless. Pathetic. Incompetent. Untrustworthy. Disorganised. Liars. Scaremongers. I'm struggling to think of any derogatory adjectives that don't apply to this government.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"the problem is most vaccines take at least 10 years to be close to 100% effective.

even the current flu vaccine is only around 48% effective so any covid-19 vaccine (that has been rushed) cannot achieve a high rate of success.

lets say they get a vaccine out in jan and say they want to have everyone injected with it by easter.

you would need to inject 600,000 people a week and you must be dreaming if you think they can produce and treat that many people each week.

the governments view is a vaccine over or close to 50% successful is acceptable. but acceptable to who? and what about the people how have a bad reaction to it.

you will not be able to sue because they will legally cover that so you may end up with people suffering serious side effects that are life changing with little chance of any quality of life or care.

when you have clowns in charge you get a circus. they dont know what that are doing from one week to the next and your going to let them inject you with something that has not been throughly tested or can achieve a a close to 100% safe rate.

the current death rate from covid-19 is less than people who die from cigarette annually but they are still on the shelves.

we need to exercise caution.

"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *el CDMan
over a year ago

Warrington

Any government would have similar issues. Vaccines? 20 billion? Need to dose twice, as only partially effective?

I have found a possible solution. Put my money where my mouth is.

Reality: vaccine could have an effect in 12 months. Hope I am wrong. xx

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

Personally, I think that there are several very positive vaccine trials ongoing at the minute. It is fairly probable that there will be at least one viable vaccine available be early spring.

Obviously there will be a phased vaccination schedule, with the most vulnerable being protected first, then those in key "front line" jobs, then everyone else. There will no doubt be people who opt out that is ok, but as each group gets vaccinated, then the transmission opportunities are reduced and everything will get better.

Cal

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me either and ive asked plenty of nurses at work too.. "

Well the latest poll suggested that 57% of the population would take it and 27% would consider it.

Anyone who refuses a vaccine can then not moan about any restrictions.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ylonSlutTV/TS
over a year ago

Durham

Be interesting to hear the reasons why anyone would not take a licenced vaccine. Some of these reasons maybe valid but i can't think of one but am prepared to be educated.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eeker of truthMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"Be interesting to hear the reasons why anyone would not take a licenced vaccine. Some of these reasons maybe valid but i can't think of one but am prepared to be educated."

Really you can't think of one single reason why someone would decline a vaccine that has been rushed through (they usualy take anywhere between 5-10 years), plus is at no great risk from the virus which has a 99.somthing% recovery rate.

Yeah I'll take my chances with the virus and my own immune system than some rushed through vaccine containing god knows what injected into my system with no data or long term testing of any side effects later down the line.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted.

Fingers Crossed"

I concur

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Be interesting to hear the reasons why anyone would not take a licenced vaccine. Some of these reasons maybe valid but i can't think of one but am prepared to be educated.

Really you can't think of one single reason why someone would decline a vaccine that has been rushed through (they usualy take anywhere between 5-10 years), plus is at no great risk from the virus which has a 99.somthing% recovery rate.

Yeah I'll take my chances with the virus and my own immune system than some rushed through vaccine containing god knows what injected into my system with no data or long term testing of any side effects later down the line.

"

But the swine flu vaccine was available 3 years after the outbreak. The reason it normally takes so long to get a vaccine is because It is not normally something that has such intense man hours put into it. Most vaccines have a 2 year clinical trial period. They started the trial 6 months ago so yes I do believe should be available in about 18 months.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ylonSlutTV/TS
over a year ago

Durham


"Be interesting to hear the reasons why anyone would not take a licenced vaccine. Some of these reasons maybe valid but i can't think of one but am prepared to be educated.

Really you can't think of one single reason why someone would decline a vaccine that has been rushed through (they usualy take anywhere between 5-10 years), plus is at no great risk from the virus which has a 99.somthing% recovery rate.

Yeah I'll take my chances with the virus and my own immune system than some rushed through vaccine containing god knows what injected into my system with no data or long term testing of any side effects later down the line.

"

I did say a licenced vaccine so would have to go through all the safety trials of any other vaccine would.

These side effects a vaccine may have that worry you. Are you not worried about the side effects covid obviously death being the worst. These include kidney lung heart and brain damage. These effects are much more prevalent than any vaccine and pretty much any licensed meducine.

There must be a valid reason not have a licensed vaccine.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ickthelick2001Man
over a year ago

nottingham

If you check government websites, you will see that comrade doris and Co have changed the law to allow unlicenced vaccines, If you look at Pandemrix, which was a swine flu vaccine rushed out by GSK, that was withdrawn due to narcolepsy, and GSK later admitted failing to disclose safety data. Sir Patrick Vallance worked for GSK also has £600000 of shares in them, so he will know all about it, channel 4 did a documentary about the great swine flu scandal. every one associated with delivery manufacturing and administering the alleged covid vaccine, has been given indeminification against vaccine injury ( that should ring alarm bells ). And all for a corona virus that has a recovery rate around 99.9%. Also remember comrade doris is living proof a vaccine is not required, he went from covid to the birth of his umpteenth child in a few days at easter. All vaccine manufacturers have criminal records, and piad out billions and billions in fines mostly for fraud deception bribery. please do your own research into these companies. all the information is out there.And you don't need any medical qualifications to find it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If you check government websites, you will see that comrade doris and Co have changed the law to allow unlicenced vaccines, If you look at Pandemrix, which was a swine flu vaccine rushed out by GSK, that was withdrawn due to narcolepsy, and GSK later admitted failing to disclose safety data. Sir Patrick Vallance worked for GSK also has £600000 of shares in them, so he will know all about it, channel 4 did a documentary about the great swine flu scandal. every one associated with delivery manufacturing and administering the alleged covid vaccine, has been given indeminification against vaccine injury ( that should ring alarm bells ). And all for a corona virus that has a recovery rate around 99.9%. Also remember comrade doris is living proof a vaccine is not required, he went from covid to the birth of his umpteenth child in a few days at easter. All vaccine manufacturers have criminal records, and piad out billions and billions in fines mostly for fraud deception bribery. please do your own research into these companies. all the information is out there.And you don't need any medical qualifications to find it. "

Well, that's a mish mash of unrelated information. Please stop trying to weave it all into one so that it lends credence to yet another conspiracy theory. Almost all of the points you have put here have been talked about individually on here and out in the media. Almost all of them have been either debunked or explained in plain English and proven to actually be nothing to be concerned about.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

well I just received my FLU JAB Today

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ensualguy70TV/TS
over a year ago

paisley


"Be interesting to hear the reasons why anyone would not take a licenced vaccine. Some of these reasons maybe valid but i can't think of one but am prepared to be educated.

Really you can't think of one single reason why someone would decline a vaccine that has been rushed through (they usualy take anywhere between 5-10 years), plus is at no great risk from the virus which has a 99.somthing% recovery rate.

Yeah I'll take my chances with the virus and my own immune system than some rushed through vaccine containing god knows what injected into my system with no data or long term testing of any side effects later down the line.

I did say a licenced vaccine so would have to go through all the safety trials of any other vaccine would.

These side effects a vaccine may have that worry you. Are you not worried about the side effects covid obviously death being the worst. These include kidney lung heart and brain damage. These effects are much more prevalent than any vaccine and pretty much any licensed meducine.

There must be a valid reason not have a licensed vaccine."

More so the fact that they want legal immunity so they cant be sued for any nasties thats in their vaccinations.

I wonder why they want to push through a vaccination for Covid, but its illegal to advertise a cure for cancer

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it."

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it "

. Why ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ickthelick2001Man
over a year ago

nottingham

good luck with your vaccine then

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?"

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ylonSlutTV/TS
over a year ago

Durham


"Be interesting to hear the reasons why anyone would not take a licenced vaccine. Some of these reasons maybe valid but i can't think of one but am prepared to be educated.

Really you can't think of one single reason why someone would decline a vaccine that has been rushed through (they usualy take anywhere between 5-10 years), plus is at no great risk from the virus which has a 99.somthing% recovery rate.

Yeah I'll take my chances with the virus and my own immune system than some rushed through vaccine containing god knows what injected into my system with no data or long term testing of any side effects later down the line.

I did say a licenced vaccine so would have to go through all the safety trials of any other vaccine would.

These side effects a vaccine may have that worry you. Are you not worried about the side effects covid obviously death being the worst. These include kidney lung heart and brain damage. These effects are much more prevalent than any vaccine and pretty much any licensed meducine.

There must be a valid reason not have a licensed vaccine.

More so the fact that they want legal immunity so they cant be sued for any nasties thats in their vaccinations.

I wonder why they want to push through a vaccination for Covid, but its illegal to advertise a cure for cancer "

If there is a proven cure for cancer it is perfectly legal to advertise it. As long as we are part of the EU you can sue any vaccine manufacturer. After 31st December 2020 i would hope that continues. It is not the case un the US.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole."

We should be given the right to make our own decisions on the risks. If people are scared then they should stay home. Our children are the ones who are going to pay in the Long run,the world needs to ge back to normal soon otherwise the damage will be irreversible

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.

We should be given the right to make our own decisions on the risks. If people are scared then they should stay home. Our children are the ones who are going to pay in the Long run,the world needs to ge back to normal soon otherwise the damage will be irreversible "

Dont children still get vaccinated?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.

We should be given the right to make our own decisions on the risks. If people are scared then they should stay home. Our children are the ones who are going to pay in the Long run,the world needs to ge back to normal soon otherwise the damage will be irreversible "

Surely the vaccine is a step towards normality?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rotic-TouchTV/TS
over a year ago

doncaster

If the covid vaccine becomes mandatory for travel overseas then the nay Sayers will be queuing up in droves

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.

We should be given the right to make our own decisions on the risks. If people are scared then they should stay home. Our children are the ones who are going to pay in the Long run,the world needs to ge back to normal soon otherwise the damage will be irreversible

Dont children still get vaccinated?"

They do, but they won't against Covid. It's an adults only vaccine, no trials in children. So anyone shouting "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN" can rest easy. No-one is going to offer your offspring under 18 a Covid vaccine

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *bzboy66Man
over a year ago

Aberdeen

Life is full of small risks like crossing the road. We all know a small percentage get killed but we factor that into our decision to cross and don't think too much about it. Same with driving. We know of people that have been injured or killed in crashes, but we still get behind the wheel every day. So it will be the same with taking a vaccine against Corona. I will take it without fear. If I end up being squashed on the road of life then so be it. Alternatively I may catch the real Corona and have to take my chances with that bad boy. Hobson's choice I believe..

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole."

Nobody's stopping you taking it or even questioning you why you would.

Crack on I say

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If the covid vaccine becomes mandatory for travel overseas then the nay Sayers will be queuing up in droves "

Or the UK holiday industries get a much welcomed boost

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

I’ve never really seen the issue about people not wanting the vaccine or any other. I’m all for personal agency.

Just get on with it or don’t.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.

Nobody's stopping you taking it or even questioning you why you would.

Crack on I say "

People are saying they wouldnt have it?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.

We should be given the right to make our own decisions on the risks. If people are scared then they should stay home. Our children are the ones who are going to pay in the Long run,the world needs to ge back to normal soon otherwise the damage will be irreversible

Surely the vaccine is a step towards normality?"

Vaccines are dangerous! Especially ones rushed through without proper testing. I don’t take any pharmaceutical drugs.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.

Nobody's stopping you taking it or even questioning you why you would.

Crack on I say

People are saying they wouldnt have it?"

.

And some people are saying they would, each to their own,I just don't see the people who say they wouldn't badgering people like you who say they would.

Like I said, crack on with it if you want it and don't if you don't.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ylonSlutTV/TS
over a year ago

Durham


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.

We should be given the right to make our own decisions on the risks. If people are scared then they should stay home. Our children are the ones who are going to pay in the Long run,the world needs to ge back to normal soon otherwise the damage will be irreversible

Surely the vaccine is a step towards normality?

Vaccines are dangerous! Especially ones rushed through without proper testing. I don’t take any pharmaceutical drugs. "

Vaccines are dangerous any evidence for this i mean real evidence for this? I think covid is dangerous i have a lot of evidence for that. I am totally against mandatory vaccines but if you choose not to one it should be on basis of a real reason not just rubbish on facebook or being a bit thick.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.

We should be given the right to make our own decisions on the risks. If people are scared then they should stay home. Our children are the ones who are going to pay in the Long run,the world needs to ge back to normal soon otherwise the damage will be irreversible

Surely the vaccine is a step towards normality?

Vaccines are dangerous! Especially ones rushed through without proper testing. I don’t take any pharmaceutical drugs.

Vaccines are dangerous any evidence for this i mean real evidence for this? I think covid is dangerous i have a lot of evidence for that. I am totally against mandatory vaccines but if you choose not to one it should be on basis of a real reason not just rubbish on facebook or being a bit thick."

I’m not on Facebook so I must be thick. There is actually quite a bit of evidence if you turn off mainstream media and do some research

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.

We should be given the right to make our own decisions on the risks. If people are scared then they should stay home. Our children are the ones who are going to pay in the Long run,the world needs to ge back to normal soon otherwise the damage will be irreversible

Surely the vaccine is a step towards normality?

Vaccines are dangerous! Especially ones rushed through without proper testing. I don’t take any pharmaceutical drugs.

Vaccines are dangerous any evidence for this i mean real evidence for this? I think covid is dangerous i have a lot of evidence for that. I am totally against mandatory vaccines but if you choose not to one it should be on basis of a real reason not just rubbish on facebook or being a bit thick.

I’m not on Facebook so I must be thick. There is actually quite a bit of evidence if you turn off mainstream media and do some research "

The billions of pounds paid out to families of people they have caused damage to is enough evidence for me

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.

We should be given the right to make our own decisions on the risks. If people are scared then they should stay home. Our children are the ones who are going to pay in the Long run,the world needs to ge back to normal soon otherwise the damage will be irreversible

Surely the vaccine is a step towards normality?

Vaccines are dangerous! Especially ones rushed through without proper testing. I don’t take any pharmaceutical drugs. "

All vaccines are dangerous?

Like the ones you have in school?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
over a year ago

Hastings

How many would if you need it to travel

I have had lots of jabs in the past as I need them to travel.

Yellow fever, Hepatitis, Typhoid etc

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rilogyMan
over a year ago

Eastbourne

No chance in hell I'm having that vaccine.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *bzboy66Man
over a year ago

Aberdeen

Each to their own. However the world has to move on. Finances dictate that and that's where a vaccine comes in as no country can afford to have their population sheltered. So sooner or later you will potentially be exposed to it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How many would if you need it to travel

I have had lots of jabs in the past as I need them to travel.

Yellow fever, Hepatitis, Typhoid etc "

I’ve had vaccines to travel in the past but I’d have to think very carefully about having any more after doing lots of research during lockdown.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
over a year ago

Hastings


"How many would if you need it to travel

I have had lots of jabs in the past as I need them to travel.

Yellow fever, Hepatitis, Typhoid etc

I’ve had vaccines to travel in the past but I’d have to think very carefully about having any more after doing lots of research during lockdown.

"

So why now change your mind. And where have you had the time to do all this research

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ylonSlutTV/TS
over a year ago

Durham


"How many would if you need it to travel

I have had lots of jabs in the past as I need them to travel.

Yellow fever, Hepatitis, Typhoid etc

I’ve had vaccines to travel in the past but I’d have to think very carefully about having any more after doing lots of research during lockdown.

So why now change your mind. And where have you had the time to do all this research "

I am genuinely interested in any info and research that isn't easily disproved because there must be some out there.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How many would if you need it to travel

I have had lots of jabs in the past as I need them to travel.

Yellow fever, Hepatitis, Typhoid etc

I’ve had vaccines to travel in the past but I’d have to think very carefully about having any more after doing lots of research during lockdown.

So why now change your mind. And where have you had the time to do all this research

I am genuinely interested in any info and research that isn't easily disproved because there must be some out there. "

The information is out there it’s just whether or not you want to believe it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he Happy ManMan
over a year ago

Merseyside


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted. "

On average vaccines take 15 years to produce. Most of them 15 years are taking up by safety trials.

Do you really want to take a vaccine that was produced in a few months?

Sometimes problems with vaccines may not show up for a few years. It may be that the people take a covid vaccine and 2,3,4,or 5 years later find out the vaccine is causing massive side affects or killing people.

The vaccine trials started by Cambridge university have been stopped due to some people getting serious side effects.

I am not taking a vaccine that was produced in a few months.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ylonSlutTV/TS
over a year ago

Durham


"How many would if you need it to travel

I have had lots of jabs in the past as I need them to travel.

Yellow fever, Hepatitis, Typhoid etc

I’ve had vaccines to travel in the past but I’d have to think very carefully about having any more after doing lots of research during lockdown.

So why now change your mind. And where have you had the time to do all this research

I am genuinely interested in any info and research that isn't easily disproved because there must be some out there.

The information is out there it’s just whether or not you want to believe it. "

That is fine but give me 1 reason not to have a licensed vaccine that isn't very easily disproved. There must be at least one.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

After reading certain things here, it's hard not to think social media is the most lethal virus.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he Happy ManMan
over a year ago

Merseyside


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

I agree with this

I think if the government are expecting a near to 100% take up then they're in for a bit of a shock "

Sadly the Government has already said once we are out of Europe they are going to pass a law the makes taking a COVID vaccine mandatory. We leave Europe on Dec 31st.

Being part of the EU would stop the Government forcing a vaccine on us. Leaving the EU allows our Government do whatever they want.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he Happy ManMan
over a year ago

Merseyside


"the problem is most vaccines take at least 10 years to be close to 100% effective.

even the current flu vaccine is only around 48% effective so any covid-19 vaccine (that has been rushed) cannot achieve a high rate of success.

lets say they get a vaccine out in jan and say they want to have everyone injected with it by easter.

you would need to inject 600,000 people a week and you must be dreaming if you think they can produce and treat that many people each week.

the governments view is a vaccine over or close to 50% successful is acceptable. but acceptable to who? and what about the people how have a bad reaction to it.

you will not be able to sue because they will legally cover that so you may end up with people suffering serious side effects that are life changing with little chance of any quality of life or care.

when you have clowns in charge you get a circus. they dont know what that are doing from one week to the next and your going to let them inject you with something that has not been throughly tested or can achieve a a close to 100% safe rate.

the current death rate from covid-19 is less than people who die from cigarette annually but they are still on the shelves.

we need to exercise caution."

Yes. The Government has promised vaccine makers if the vaccine turns out be bad and causing pople problems they wiil not be prosecuted.

Think about that for a moment.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ike4362ukMan
over a year ago

Cheshunt


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

Me neither. I definitely won’t be having it . Why ?

Here is something stopping you catching a virus that may kill you and your loved ones.

Obviously you wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.

We should be given the right to make our own decisions on the risks. If people are scared then they should stay home. Our children are the ones who are going to pay in the Long run,the world needs to ge back to normal soon otherwise the damage will be irreversible "

Unfortunately, as this thread shows, many people have no idea about risks about taking vaccines. Risks are expectionally low. Wakefield deserves to be on trial for crimes against humanity. Very few people know he was a director and shareholder in a company that produced single vector vaccines when he concocted his lies about MMR. He did it to protect his own income. The result of his lies is children dying from Measles.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ike4362ukMan
over a year ago

Cheshunt


"...

Really you can't think of one single reason why someone would decline a vaccine that has been rushed through (they usualy take anywhere between 5-10 years), plus is at no great risk from the virus which has a 99.somthing% recovery rate.

Yeah I'll take my chances with the virus and my own immune system than some rushed through vaccine containing god knows what injected into my system with no data or long term testing of any side effects later down the line.

...

These side effects a vaccine may have that worry you. Are you not worried about the side effects covid obviously death being the worst. These include kidney lung heart and brain damage. These effects are much more prevalent than any vaccine and pretty much any licensed meducine.

There must be a valid reason not have a licensed vaccine.

More so the fact that they want legal immunity so they cant be sued for any nasties thats in their vaccinations.

I wonder why they want to push through a vaccination for Covid, but its illegal to advertise a cure for cancer "

What utter ill-educated bollocks.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ike4362ukMan
over a year ago

Cheshunt


"...

Yes. The Government has promised vaccine makers if the vaccine turns out be bad and causing pople problems they wiil not be prosecuted.

Think about that for a moment. "

No they haven't. The companies have only asked for that if the Government pushes for an early release (as the Russians did). In which case the Government pick up the tab for any litigation. Funnily enough that isn't going to happen.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it."

Everyone I've talked to (friends, family and about 40 work colleagues on the work forums), have said they will take it.

People often socialise with people with similar viewpoints, and it causes an echo-chamber.

You have to recognise this and realise just because it's how everyone 'you' know thinks, that is not a good indication of how 'everyone' thinks.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it.

I agree with this

I think if the government are expecting a near to 100% take i tup then they're in for a bit of a shock "

I think the public my be in for a shock as it wont be offered to lots of people

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted.

On average vaccines take 15 years to produce. Most of them 15 years are taking up by safety trials.

Do you really want to take a vaccine that was produced in a few months?

Sometimes problems with vaccines may not show up for a few years. It may be that the people take a covid vaccine and 2,3,4,or 5 years later find out the vaccine is causing massive side affects or killing people.

The vaccine trials started by Cambridge university have been stopped due to some people getting serious side effects.

I am not taking a vaccine that was produced in a few months."

The reason the vaccines can be produced quickly is partly due to improvements in methods and technologies, in the same way as cars can now be built much quicker now than they were 50 years ago and computers are much more advanced than they were 10 years ago.

Speed of development is not really an issue as they will still go through the same level of testing as the older vaccinations.

Here's some actually info on how they are developing it so quickly that might ease your concerns a little :

https://wellcome.org/news/how-can-we-develop-covid-19-vaccine-quickly

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ensualguy70TV/TS
over a year ago

paisley


"Be interesting to hear the reasons why anyone would not take a licenced vaccine. Some of these reasons maybe valid but i can't think of one but am prepared to be educated.

Really you can't think of one single reason why someone would decline a vaccine that has been rushed through (they usualy take anywhere between 5-10 years), plus is at no great risk from the virus which has a 99.somthing% recovery rate.

Yeah I'll take my chances with the virus and my own immune system than some rushed through vaccine containing god knows what injected into my system with no data or long term testing of any side effects later down the line.

I did say a licenced vaccine so would have to go through all the safety trials of any other vaccine would.

These side effects a vaccine may have that worry you. Are you not worried about the side effects covid obviously death being the worst. These include kidney lung heart and brain damage. These effects are much more prevalent than any vaccine and pretty much any licensed meducine.

There must be a valid reason not have a licensed vaccine.

More so the fact that they want legal immunity so they cant be sued for any nasties thats in their vaccinations.

I wonder why they want to push through a vaccination for Covid, but its illegal to advertise a cure for cancer

If there is a proven cure for cancer it is perfectly legal to advertise it. As long as we are part of the EU you can sue any vaccine manufacturer. After 31st December 2020 i would hope that continues. It is not the case un the US."

Go and check out the Cancer Act 1939, it's never been repealed and it states in there it is illegal to advertise a cure for cancer and we weren't in the EU in 1939 were we??

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
over a year ago

Leeds


"

Sadly the Government has already said once we are out of Europe they are going to pass a law the makes taking a COVID vaccine mandatory. We leave Europe on Dec 31st.

"

When did the government say this ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

Weird what people believe. Nobody is going to force you to take it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *isfits behaving badlyCouple
over a year ago

Coventry


"A vaccine, on it's own, will not end the restrictions. It's highly likely that even if a vaccine is found restrictions will continue for several years - if we let them.

Why?

1 - Availability.

There is unlikely to be sufficient vaccine for a mass vaccination program for several months at least & possibly considerably longer. The most at risk will be vaccinated first but that leaves the rest of the country in limbo.

2 - Resources

There are already questions being asked about the logistics of storing, distributing and administering vaccine on the scale required. It's never been done and there is as yet no sign of the planning needed to actually accomplish it.

3 - Efficacy

There's no information yet on how effective a covid vaccine may be or how long the protection provided lasts. Best guesses are around 50 - 60% effective and protection for between 6 and 12 months. Both of those point to mass vaccination being a long-term logistical nightmare.

4 - Uptake

To produce 'herd immunity' we'd need vaccination levels of between 60 & 80% of the population. Given the growing level of resistance to vaccination it's highly likely we won't reach those numbers.

All of those things point to vaccination being far from the magic bullet to end this. The ONLY way it will end is when we as a population decide it needs to end and accept that, as with every other illness, there will be a price to pay."

I'm not convinced of restrictions for years. Even if vaccines prove to be a failure. I honestly don't think the public will tolerate things as they are beyond another year. I think if this is long term people will opt to remove restrictions and accept the risks. Life is inherently risky and although we don't want unnecessary risk we often accept a certain element of risk to health in so much of the things we love to do and achieve.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *isfits behaving badlyCouple
over a year ago

Coventry

Even if the vacine is 50% effective and uptake is not huge every leap we stop the virus making makes an impact. It may just be enough to tip this pandemic into localised and easier to control epidemics. Which would certainly aid in both saving lives and making conditions right for normal life in 'clean' areas.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ynecplCouple
over a year ago

Newcastle upon Tyne


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted. "

Article on the BBC website yesterday said that even if a vaccine is released at the earliest March you are looking at another 12 to 24 months before restrictions can be lifted.

We need to look at other approaches lockdown does not work even the WHO organisation said that. The virus does not disappear it is just suppressed until we all start moving around again.

Currently the governments ham fisted attempts at protection everybody and keeping the economy going is failing on both counts many more will die from the medical conditions that are not being treated or diagnosed due to the Govt complete fixation on the virus whilst people are losing there jobs with little hope of finding another anytime soon.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asIsaCouple
over a year ago

harrow


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted.

Article on the BBC website yesterday said that even if a vaccine is released at the earliest March you are looking at another 12 to 24 months before restrictions can be lifted.

We need to look at other approaches lockdown does not work even the WHO organisation said that. The virus does not disappear it is just suppressed until we all start moving around again.

Currently the governments ham fisted attempts at protection everybody and keeping the economy going is failing on both counts many more will die from the medical conditions that are not being treated or diagnosed due to the Govt complete fixation on the virus whilst people are losing there jobs with little hope of finding another anytime soon."

And what is your suggestion?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *he-Hosiery-GentMan
over a year ago

Older Hot Bearded Guy


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted. "

Lol. We won’t be getting a vaccine.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted.

Article on the BBC website yesterday said that even if a vaccine is released at the earliest March you are looking at another 12 to 24 months before restrictions can be lifted.

We need to look at other approaches lockdown does not work even the WHO organisation said that. The virus does not disappear it is just suppressed until we all start moving around again.

Currently the governments ham fisted attempts at protection everybody and keeping the economy going is failing on both counts many more will die from the medical conditions that are not being treated or diagnosed due to the Govt complete fixation on the virus whilst people are losing there jobs with little hope of finding another anytime soon."

No one with any sense expected or to disappear during lockdown. You didn't 'really' think that did you?

All lockdown was for was to reduce the speed of spread so that we were not overwhelmed and even more people died. This has proved successful to a degree.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *urekamanfor2Man
over a year ago

Shoreham


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted.

Lol. We won’t be getting a vaccine. "

Why wont we be getting a vaccine ???

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted.

Lol. We won’t be getting a vaccine.

Why wont we be getting a vaccine ???"

I think they may have meant they won't be getting it personally.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

well at least if 50% of the country refuses the vaccine. The other 50% will get it sooner!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *urekamanfor2Man
over a year ago

Shoreham

I cant see 50 % refusing but did listen to the radio 5 debate last night and they reckoned about 20% are stupid enough not to have the vaccine

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire


"I cant see 50 % refusing but did listen to the radio 5 debate last night and they reckoned about 20% are stupid enough not to have the vaccine "

Not sure where the '50%' figure came from but it bears no resemblance to any figures I've seen.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ent in BlackMan
over a year ago

Silsden

This was such a positive thread to begin with. OP me too!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *aughty_builder87Man
over a year ago

Keston

A source at my local hospital has told me they are gearing up for a roll out extremely soon. If the elderly are seen to first then that should keep the death toll from spiking. Hopefully within 6 months we should be alot closer to a normal life. 2020 has been a year to forget, hopefully by summer 2021 we can get back to something like normality.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ent in BlackMan
over a year ago

Silsden


"A source at my local hospital has told me they are gearing up for a roll out extremely soon. If the elderly are seen to first then that should keep the death toll from spiking. Hopefully within 6 months we should be alot closer to a normal life. 2020 has been a year to forget, hopefully by summer 2021 we can get back to something like normality."

Couldn’t have put that better mate

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *elshsunsWoman
over a year ago

Flintshire

No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

New YouGov research shows that two thirds of the public (67%) say they are either very (42%) or fairly (25%) likely to take the vaccine when it is available, with one in five (21%) saying they are unlikely to get it and 12% are unsure.

Yougov. 1 day ago.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ...."

Oh yes.

The alt right antivaxer who claims that people with Covid are immune for life after 10 days.

No wonder they fired her.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ancs MinxWoman
over a year ago

Burnley


"Hopefully we will have a vaccine soon and restrictions will be lifted.

On average vaccines take 15 years to produce. Most of them 15 years are taking up by safety trials.

Do you really want to take a vaccine that was produced in a few months?

Sometimes problems with vaccines may not show up for a few years. It may be that the people take a covid vaccine and 2,3,4,or 5 years later find out the vaccine is causing massive side affects or killing people.

The vaccine trials started by Cambridge university have been stopped due to some people getting serious side effects.

I am not taking a vaccine that was produced in a few months."

Lot of people like myself totally agree , so I will pass on the vacine

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

There have been several reasons that the production of these vaccines have been much quicker. Firstly they are mainly based on a pre-existing delivery system, this means that the majority of the vaccine has had many years of testing. Secondly the various stages of testing have been carried out simultaneously, and finally the production phase has been started before the testing is completed, this means that if the vaccine is approved it is ready to roll... obviously if it fails then the production run is wasted and will be destroyed.

Cal

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ent in BlackMan
over a year ago

Silsden


"There have been several reasons that the production of these vaccines have been much quicker. Firstly they are mainly based on a pre-existing delivery system, this means that the majority of the vaccine has had many years of testing. Secondly the various stages of testing have been carried out simultaneously, and finally the production phase has been started before the testing is completed, this means that if the vaccine is approved it is ready to roll... obviously if it fails then the production run is wasted and will be destroyed.

Cal"

It’s nice to read some common sense.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"There have been several reasons that the production of these vaccines have been much quicker. Firstly they are mainly based on a pre-existing delivery system, this means that the majority of the vaccine has had many years of testing. Secondly the various stages of testing have been carried out simultaneously, and finally the production phase has been started before the testing is completed, this means that if the vaccine is approved it is ready to roll... obviously if it fails then the production run is wasted and will be destroyed.

Cal

---

It’s nice to read some common sense."

I normally get told off for talking sense.

To add a little balance though, there is still no long-term data beyond about 6 months for the completed vaccines, so there will always be a perceived risk.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ent in BlackMan
over a year ago

Silsden


"There have been several reasons that the production of these vaccines have been much quicker. Firstly they are mainly based on a pre-existing delivery system, this means that the majority of the vaccine has had many years of testing. Secondly the various stages of testing have been carried out simultaneously, and finally the production phase has been started before the testing is completed, this means that if the vaccine is approved it is ready to roll... obviously if it fails then the production run is wasted and will be destroyed.

Cal

---

It’s nice to read some common sense.

I normally get told off for talking sense.

To add a little balance though, there is still no long-term data beyond about 6 months for the completed vaccines, so there will always be a perceived risk. "

Absolutely, but it’s low.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Oh yes.

The alt right antivaxer who claims that people with Covid are immune for life after 10 days.

No wonder they fired her.

"

Lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

To be fair I have not met or spoken to many who would take this so called vaccine. Many many won't. The majority will.. it's spinning a wheel..

A game of Russian Roulette..

Shit or bust..

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I honestly can’t believe there’s so many people waiting for this ‘magical back to normal vaccination’ it’s actually A little disturbing

A vaccine Usually requires 10/15 years of research before scientists will release to the public..The fact this ‘Covid19’ Is not only a new strain of A virus....The survival rate is actually higher than the success rate of the bloody vaccine it’s self!!! Does that not cause a cog or two to turn in those heads?

I honestly can’t believe people are just so willing and accepting of this kinda thing!!

( just to add Having Been vaccinated as a child myself and had both my children vaccinated also (mmf/booster etc) I am far from an antivaxer..)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *bwlaurenWoman
over a year ago

chester

I don't understand how anyone can know the long term effects of taking a vaccine that has only just been developed- could easily find it causes cancer or other side effects in years to come, so I wouldn't take it when the recovery rate of covid is so good.

Having worked with livestock vaccinations and knowing vaccine for bovine digital dermatitis has been undergoing tests for long term side effects since 2014 but still hasn't been licensed I can't see how human vaccine can be properly tested in such a short time.

As with everything in life it's down to each individuals choice, but I for one won't be playing guinea pig.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"I don't understand how anyone can know the long term effects of taking a vaccine that has only just been developed- could easily find it causes cancer or other side effects in years to come, so I wouldn't take it when the recovery rate of covid is so good.

Having worked with livestock vaccinations and knowing vaccine for bovine digital dermatitis has been undergoing tests for long term side effects since 2014 but still hasn't been licensed I can't see how human vaccine can be properly tested in such a short time.

As with everything in life it's down to each individuals choice, but I for one won't be playing guinea pig."

The long term side effects of Covid aren't fully known either, but initial studies seem to show that it can potentially be quite nasty.

I'd prefer to risk a man-made vaccine from scientists who study this stuff and 'might' have side effects, than risk a virus that 'might' kill me and also 'might' have (probably has) side effects.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"I honestly can’t believe there’s so many people waiting for this ‘magical back to normal vaccination’ it’s actually A little disturbing

A vaccine Usually requires 10/15 years of research before scientists will release to the public..The fact this ‘Covid19’ Is not only a new strain of A virus....The survival rate is actually higher than the success rate of the bloody vaccine it’s self!!! Does that not cause a cog or two to turn in those heads?

I honestly can’t believe people are just so willing and accepting of this kinda thing!!

( just to add Having Been vaccinated as a child myself and had both my children vaccinated also (mmf/booster etc) I am far from an antivaxer..) "

As had been mentioned lots, the vaccine it being developed quickly because of money and cooperation.

All labs around the world are sharing info. This does not normally happen.

All 3 stages of testing are happening at once. This is normally to expensive as the tests cost a lot to run, and if any fail they have to start over. Running 3 at once risks a lot more money.

There has already been lots of studies into making a vaccine for the original SARS which is very similar. This has been going on since 2012.

They are also developing the vaccine with new methods. This is progress and happens with all technology.

More info can be found about how it is being made quickly here :

https://wellcome.org/news/how-can-we-develop-covid-19-vaccine-quickly

At for the survival rate and the success rate, you have forgotten about the long term damage Covid can apparently cause to the body. It's better to not get it than survive it.

Plus if it's success rate is 95% from Modena or 90% from Pfizer, than that reduces the pool of people that might not survive by 90% from what it is currently.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

As had been mentioned lots, the vaccine it being developed quickly because of money and cooperation.

All labs around the world are sharing info. This does not normally happen.

All 3 stages of testing are happening at once. This is normally to expensive as the tests cost a lot to run, and if any fail they have to start over. Running 3 at once risks a lot more money.

There has already been lots of studies into making a vaccine for the original SARS which is very similar. This has been going on since 2012.

They are also developing the vaccine with new methods. This is progress and happens with all technology.

More info can be found about how it is being made quickly here :

https://wellcome.org/news/how-can-we-develop-covid-19-vaccine-quickly

At for the survival rate and the success rate, you have forgotten about the long term damage Covid can apparently cause to the body. It's better to not get it than survive it.

Plus if it's success rate is 95% from Modena or 90% from Pfizer, than that reduces the pool of people that might not survive by 90% from what it is currently. "

So the more money and weight that is thrown around the quicker the vaccine that was already one of the more obvious Reasons.

Secondly Dont Make any difference how many labs are working on the vaccine.. No of them will be held accountable for any terminal or fatal repercussions infact they’ve made sure they’re arses are safe no one can hold them All accountable For any long lasting effects caused by this vaccine..fuuuuck that.

And haven’t forgotten because there’s nothing to remember. Longterm effects are bull they know jack shit about that it’s all guessing and fear mongering!

Right so why then give they can’t they give the vaccine to those vulnerable and elderly etc.. we know it’s gonna he made mandatory, it’s all predictable now! Why does everyone need to be made to have it? Cos I don’t need it ...

For the past 11 months I’ve not once worn a mask, My circle is small anyway but I’ve continued to see family and friends and once or twice I’ve not even wiped my trolly down when Out shopping I haven’t Carried or Suffered With covid I don’t need the vaccine

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

As had been mentioned lots, the vaccine it being developed quickly because of money and cooperation.

All labs around the world are sharing info. This does not normally happen.

All 3 stages of testing are happening at once. This is normally to expensive as the tests cost a lot to run, and if any fail they have to start over. Running 3 at once risks a lot more money.

There has already been lots of studies into making a vaccine for the original SARS which is very similar. This has been going on since 2012.

They are also developing the vaccine with new methods. This is progress and happens with all technology.

More info can be found about how it is being made quickly here :

https://wellcome.org/news/how-can-we-develop-covid-19-vaccine-quickly

At for the survival rate and the success rate, you have forgotten about the long term damage Covid can apparently cause to the body. It's better to not get it than survive it.

Plus if it's success rate is 95% from Modena or 90% from Pfizer, than that reduces the pool of people that might not survive by 90% from what it is currently.

So the more money and weight that is thrown around the quicker the vaccine that was already one of the more obvious Reasons.

Secondly Dont Make any difference how many labs are working on the vaccine.. No of them will be held accountable for any terminal or fatal repercussions infact they’ve made sure they’re arses are safe no one can hold them All accountable For any long lasting effects caused by this vaccine..fuuuuck that.

And haven’t forgotten because there’s nothing to remember. Longterm effects are bull they know jack shit about that it’s all guessing and fear mongering!

Right so why then give they can’t they give the vaccine to those vulnerable and elderly etc.. we know it’s gonna he made mandatory, it’s all predictable now! Why does everyone need to be made to have it? Cos I don’t need it ...

For the past 11 months I’ve not once worn a mask, My circle is small anyway but I’ve continued to see family and friends and once or twice I’ve not even wiped my trolly down when Out shopping I haven’t Carried or Suffered With covid I don’t need the vaccine "

...first...5...minutes ..of...I am....legend

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big percentage of people will refuse to have the covid vaccine.

I don't know anyone who would take it."

There is a problem I have is that this vaccine might cause problems x years down the line, this we don’t know since they can’t see into the future, for one I will hold back and wait years to come before injecting anything into my body.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ...."

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"I honestly can’t believe there’s so many people waiting for this ‘magical back to normal vaccination’ it’s actually A little disturbing

A vaccine Usually requires 10/15 years of research before scientists will release to the public..The fact this ‘Covid19’ Is not only a new strain of A virus....The survival rate is actually higher than the success rate of the bloody vaccine it’s self!!! Does that not cause a cog or two to turn in those heads?

I honestly can’t believe people are just so willing and accepting of this kinda thing!!

( just to add Having Been vaccinated as a child myself and had both my children vaccinated also (mmf/booster etc) I am far from an antivaxer..) "

"( just to add Having Been vaccinated as a child myself and had both my children vaccinated also (mmf/booster etc) I am far from an antivaxer..)" I'm the same, it is just this vaccine I don't want, that in no way makes me an antivaxer either.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ungblackbullMan
over a year ago

scotland


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice. "

https://fullfact.org/health/mrna-covid-vaccine/

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ungblackbullMan
over a year ago

scotland


"I honestly can’t believe there’s so many people waiting for this ‘magical back to normal vaccination’ it’s actually A little disturbing

A vaccine Usually requires 10/15 years of research before scientists will release to the public..The fact this ‘Covid19’ Is not only a new strain of A virus....The survival rate is actually higher than the success rate of the bloody vaccine it’s self!!! Does that not cause a cog or two to turn in those heads?

I honestly can’t believe people are just so willing and accepting of this kinda thing!!

( just to add Having Been vaccinated as a child myself and had both my children vaccinated also (mmf/booster etc) I am far from an antivaxer..) "

Why are you comparing survival rates with success rate of the vaccine? I think it's you that has a cog or two not turning...

The point in a vaccine is to help prevent the spread of the virus. It's not just about the individual. The 90% who have an immunity wont get covid and therefore can't possibly die from it. That means the number of deaths drop to just 10%. Of those 50,000 deaths we have had, only 5,000 would have died saving 45,000 lives.

It reduces deaths further by preventing the spread. If everyone got vaccination tomorrow then the R rate of around 1.2 at the moment drops to 0.12. Currently, 22k testing positive at the moment. Next week, that would drop to 2,500 and then the following week about 300 and then about 40. By Christmas there would be no covid.

In terms of "A vaccine Usually requires 10/15 years of research before scientists will release to the public.."

That's absolute nonsense. Vaccine development is slowed dramatically by the cost of development and the approval process rather than research and testing. Everything is being thrown at this virus from cash to resources. Trial phases are being conducted simultaneously. Thousands of people have been enrolled in the trials at the start rather than gradually. How easy do you think it is to find a significant enough number for people to enroll in normal circumstances? I would say that it would be tine consuming. For covid, plenty of people are volunteering.

The approval process normally takes about 3 years. This is because it takes that length of time to go through the process. Processes can always be made quicker by making sure all reviewers drop what they are doing and review the research/results etc.

The drug has already been manufactured in enough quantities to begin the rollout. A vaccine would normally be manufactured after approved.

As for not believing how people are so willing to accept this, 43,000 were in the Pfizer phase 3 trials. The short term side effects are nothing to worry about. As for long term side effects, just like any other drug, these are detected after the drug has been rolled out.

During the wars people went off to fight knowing that they may die but they did so to protect the country and the lives of others. Now there is somewhat of a duty for each of us to help protect the lives of others especially those close to us. The main difference is that the vaccine is most likely going to cause you a bit of discomfort for a couple of days....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"I honestly can’t believe there’s so many people waiting for this ‘magical back to normal vaccination’ it’s actually A little disturbing

A vaccine Usually requires 10/15 years of research before scientists will release to the public..The fact this ‘Covid19’ Is not only a new strain of A virus....The survival rate is actually higher than the success rate of the bloody vaccine it’s self!!! Does that not cause a cog or two to turn in those heads?

I honestly can’t believe people are just so willing and accepting of this kinda thing!!

( just to add Having Been vaccinated as a child myself and had both my children vaccinated also (mmf/booster etc) I am far from an antivaxer..)

Why are you comparing survival rates with success rate of the vaccine? I think it's you that has a cog or two not turning...

The point in a vaccine is to help prevent the spread of the virus. It's not just about the individual. The 90% who have an immunity wont get covid and therefore can't possibly die from it. That means the number of deaths drop to just 10%. Of those 50,000 deaths we have had, only 5,000 would have died saving 45,000 lives.

It reduces deaths further by preventing the spread. If everyone got vaccination tomorrow then the R rate of around 1.2 at the moment drops to 0.12. Currently, 22k testing positive at the moment. Next week, that would drop to 2,500 and then the following week about 300 and then about 40. By Christmas there would be no covid.

In terms of "A vaccine Usually requires 10/15 years of research before scientists will release to the public.."

That's absolute nonsense. Vaccine development is slowed dramatically by the cost of development and the approval process rather than research and testing. Everything is being thrown at this virus from cash to resources. Trial phases are being conducted simultaneously. Thousands of people have been enrolled in the trials at the start rather than gradually. How easy do you think it is to find a significant enough number for people to enroll in normal circumstances? I would say that it would be tine consuming. For covid, plenty of people are volunteering.

The approval process normally takes about 3 years. This is because it takes that length of time to go through the process. Processes can always be made quicker by making sure all reviewers drop what they are doing and review the research/results etc.

The drug has already been manufactured in enough quantities to begin the rollout. A vaccine would normally be manufactured after approved.

As for not believing how people are so willing to accept this, 43,000 were in the Pfizer phase 3 trials. The short term side effects are nothing to worry about. As for long term side effects, just like any other drug, these are detected after the drug has been rolled out.

During the wars people went off to fight knowing that they may die but they did so to protect the country and the lives of others. Now there is somewhat of a duty for each of us to help protect the lives of others especially those close to us. The main difference is that the vaccine is most likely going to cause you a bit of discomfort for a couple of days....

"

Most people went to war because they were drafted is forced to go.. the consequences were being called a coward or jailed for being an obector. When they make the so called vaccine compulsory will they be jailed for being an injector objector

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"

So the more money and weight that is thrown around the quicker the vaccine that was already one of the more obvious Reasons.

Secondly Dont Make any difference how many labs are working on the vaccine.. No of them will be held accountable for any terminal or fatal repercussions infact they’ve made sure they’re arses are safe no one can hold them All accountable For any long lasting effects caused by this vaccine..fuuuuck that.

And haven’t forgotten because there’s nothing to remember. Longterm effects are bull they know jack shit about that it’s all guessing and fear mongering!

Right so why then give they can’t they give the vaccine to those vulnerable and elderly etc.. we know it’s gonna he made mandatory, it’s all predictable now! Why does everyone need to be made to have it? Cos I don’t need it ...

For the past 11 months I’ve not once worn a mask, My circle is small anyway but I’ve continued to see family and friends and once or twice I’ve not even wiped my trolly down when Out shopping I haven’t Carried or Suffered With covid I don’t need the vaccine "

The labs may not be held accountable for any issues, but the virus obviously can't be held accountable for its issues either.

If you actually looked into it, you would see the long term side effects of the virus are starting to be seen. It's not just scare mongering.

But what is scare mongering is saying that the vaccine will be mandatory and they are taking away our rights by giving us it, as there is no evidence to suggest that at all.

They will start giving the vaccine to the vulnerable first, but that will not protect everyone. There are plenty of people who are vulnerable, but due to their conditions are unable to take a vaccination.

You've not worn a mask and haven't caught the virus. That's the same logic as people saying they never have safe sex as they have never caught an STD.

Do you think that is a good enough reason to not have safe sex?

It's a gamble and the chances are that one day you will get infected.

I'm glad that you haven't caught it, but that doesn't mean others haven't and you haven't just been lucky.

Maybe the fact that many other people aren't being selfish and are wearing masks and wiping down the surfaces you go on to touch has protected you.

Anyway, no point discussing these topics really as people like you don't care about facts, just opinions.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ickthelick2001Man
over a year ago

nottingham

The cancer Act 1939 will stop you advertising a cure for cancer, the last prosecution I can find was in November 2017, and there have been quite a few over the years.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"The cancer Act 1939 will stop you advertising a cure for cancer, the last prosecution I can find was in November 2017, and there have been quite a few over the years. "

It's a blanket ban on advertising any cancer treatments to the general public and was enacted due to the prevalence of very dangerous quack treatments being advertised in newspapers and periodicals in the era it was enacted in.

It is unethical to allow uncontrolled adverts for alleged "cures" to be promoted to vulnerable people.

The Act also prevents known cancer treatments such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy etc being "advertised".

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"The cancer Act 1939 will stop you advertising a cure for cancer, the last prosecution I can find was in November 2017, and there have been quite a few over the years.

It's a blanket ban on advertising any cancer treatments to the general public and was enacted due to the prevalence of very dangerous quack treatments being advertised in newspapers and periodicals in the era it was enacted in.

It is unethical to allow uncontrolled adverts for alleged "cures" to be promoted to vulnerable people.

The Act also prevents known cancer treatments such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy etc being "advertised"."

PS: Three out of four sections of the Cancer Act 1939 have been replaced by more recent legislation (regarding legal requirements for local health authorities to provide suitable treatment and funding for cancer treatment). Only section 4 (the bit prohibiting advertisement) is still in use.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hagTonightMan
over a year ago

From the land of haribos.

Yes, lets hope for the best, it could take 10 years or so to develop a vaccine. I am not talking about the "rush" vaccines here.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Don't forget that the Government's see their citizens as tax revenue. They do not care about an individual's health but they sure as eggs are eggs don't want to see a drop in tax revenue

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

https://fullfact.org/health/mrna-covid-vaccine/"

So if that's the link for the full facts, why haven't they listed the ingredients and what they are or any possible or known side effects? Not the full facts as I can't find them anywhere on that link.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

https://fullfact.org/health/mrna-covid-vaccine/

So if that's the link for the full facts, why haven't they listed the ingredients and what they are or any possible or known side effects? Not the full facts as I can't find them anywhere on that link. "

Do you know that tuna contains more mercury, with a longer half life, than vaccines?

Do you know that bananas have a measurable level of radiation?

Do you know that apples contain cyanide?

"List of ingredients" means nothing without knowing how they interact together, and "ooh look that looks toxic" is a classic argument from hucksters and quacks. Don't fall for it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *imes_berksMan
over a year ago

Bracknell


"Yes, lets hope for the best, it could take 10 years or so to develop a vaccine. I am not talking about the "rush" vaccines here."

You keep quoting this line about 10 years to develop a vaccine. can you show me the phases they have missed out for the Pfizer vaccine? Are you an expert on the registration scheme for getting a vaccine to be accepted by regulatory bodies? Or are you just quoting a line you have seen in the social media?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Yes, lets hope for the best, it could take 10 years or so to develop a vaccine. I am not talking about the "rush" vaccines here.

You keep quoting this line about 10 years to develop a vaccine. can you show me the phases they have missed out for the Pfizer vaccine? Are you an expert on the registration scheme for getting a vaccine to be accepted by regulatory bodies? Or are you just quoting a line you have seen in the social media?"

Quite.

Lots of anti vax tropes being cited here that are delightfully evidence free

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eddy and legsCouple
over a year ago

the wetlands


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

https://fullfact.org/health/mrna-covid-vaccine/

So if that's the link for the full facts, why haven't they listed the ingredients and what they are or any possible or known side effects? Not the full facts as I can't find them anywhere on that link. "

Try reading the published study notes of the Pfizer Covid vaccine.

No puppy dog tails, unborn children or bill gates dna

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *imes_berksMan
over a year ago

Bracknell


"I honestly can’t believe there’s so many people waiting for this ‘magical back to normal vaccination’ it’s actually A little disturbing

A vaccine Usually requires 10/15 years of research before scientists will release to the public..The fact this ‘Covid19’ Is not only a new strain of A virus....The survival rate is actually higher than the success rate of the bloody vaccine it’s self!!! Does that not cause a cog or two to turn in those heads?

I honestly can’t believe people are just so willing and accepting of this kinda thing!!

( just to add Having Been vaccinated as a child myself and had both my children vaccinated also (mmf/booster etc) I am far from an antivaxer..)

Why are you comparing survival rates with success rate of the vaccine? I think it's you that has a cog or two not turning...

The point in a vaccine is to help prevent the spread of the virus. It's not just about the individual. The 90% who have an immunity wont get covid and therefore can't possibly die from it. That means the number of deaths drop to just 10%. Of those 50,000 deaths we have had, only 5,000 would have died saving 45,000 lives.

It reduces deaths further by preventing the spread. If everyone got vaccination tomorrow then the R rate of around 1.2 at the moment drops to 0.12. Currently, 22k testing positive at the moment. Next week, that would drop to 2,500 and then the following week about 300 and then about 40. By Christmas there would be no covid.

In terms of "A vaccine Usually requires 10/15 years of research before scientists will release to the public.."

That's absolute nonsense. Vaccine development is slowed dramatically by the cost of development and the approval process rather than research and testing. Everything is being thrown at this virus from cash to resources. Trial phases are being conducted simultaneously. Thousands of people have been enrolled in the trials at the start rather than gradually. How easy do you think it is to find a significant enough number for people to enroll in normal circumstances? I would say that it would be tine consuming. For covid, plenty of people are volunteering.

The approval process normally takes about 3 years. This is because it takes that length of time to go through the process. Processes can always be made quicker by making sure all reviewers drop what they are doing and review the research/results etc.

The drug has already been manufactured in enough quantities to begin the rollout. A vaccine would normally be manufactured after approved.

As for not believing how people are so willing to accept this, 43,000 were in the Pfizer phase 3 trials. The short term side effects are nothing to worry about. As for long term side effects, just like any other drug, these are detected after the drug has been rolled out.

During the wars people went off to fight knowing that they may die but they did so to protect the country and the lives of others. Now there is somewhat of a duty for each of us to help protect the lives of others especially those close to us. The main difference is that the vaccine is most likely going to cause you a bit of discomfort for a couple of days....

"

Well put. Someone who obviously understands the registration process. A major amount of time will be saved at the reviewing the data stage by the regulators. Instead of going in a queue as is the normal case and taking 3 years to review, the vaccines will go to the top of the list and the regulators will load people onto reviewing the data.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hagTonightMan
over a year ago

From the land of haribos.


"Yes, lets hope for the best, it could take 10 years or so to develop a vaccine. I am not talking about the "rush" vaccines here.

You keep quoting this line about 10 years to develop a vaccine. can you show me the phases they have missed out for the Pfizer vaccine? Are you an expert on the registration scheme for getting a vaccine to be accepted by regulatory bodies? Or are you just quoting a line you have seen in the social media?

Quite.

Lots of anti vax tropes being cited here that are delightfully evidence free"

I am not one. I just wouldnt take a "rush" vaccine, that havent been tested for the side effects, it takes years of testing and that is if there arent any hiccups along the way either.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

https://fullfact.org/health/mrna-covid-vaccine/

So if that's the link for the full facts, why haven't they listed the ingredients and what they are or any possible or known side effects? Not the full facts as I can't find them anywhere on that link.

Try reading the published study notes of the Pfizer Covid vaccine.

No puppy dog tails, unborn children or bill gates dna"

I was referring specifically to the link that was posted. No need to be condescending.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *uited staffs guyMan
over a year ago

staffordshire

The majority of side effects of any vaccine are going to be quick

Therefore a small study over 10 years is infinitely worse than a large study over 6 months

It’s numbers you need to find side effects - a 2% side effect rate will be obvious quickly, a 1 in a 1000 you need more numbers for

Because of the imperative fortunately the trials have recruited quickly and got tens of thousands in their studies

As such no one on here will be the ‘guinea pig’ as the guinea pigs have all already had it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Yes, lets hope for the best, it could take 10 years or so to develop a vaccine. I am not talking about the "rush" vaccines here.

You keep quoting this line about 10 years to develop a vaccine. can you show me the phases they have missed out for the Pfizer vaccine? Are you an expert on the registration scheme for getting a vaccine to be accepted by regulatory bodies? Or are you just quoting a line you have seen in the social media?

Quite.

Lots of anti vax tropes being cited here that are delightfully evidence freeI am not one. I just wouldnt take a "rush" vaccine, that havent been tested for the side effects, it takes years of testing and that is if there arent any hiccups along the way either."

I didn't call you anti vax. I said that there are anti vax tropes (themes or stories). Rush vaccine is one of them

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hagTonightMan
over a year ago

From the land of haribos.


"Yes, lets hope for the best, it could take 10 years or so to develop a vaccine. I am not talking about the "rush" vaccines here.

You keep quoting this line about 10 years to develop a vaccine. can you show me the phases they have missed out for the Pfizer vaccine? Are you an expert on the registration scheme for getting a vaccine to be accepted by regulatory bodies? Or are you just quoting a line you have seen in the social media?

Quite.

Lots of anti vax tropes being cited here that are delightfully evidence freeI am not one. I just wouldnt take a "rush" vaccine, that havent been tested for the side effects, it takes years of testing and that is if there arent any hiccups along the way either.

I didn't call you anti vax. I said that there are anti vax tropes (themes or stories). Rush vaccine is one of them "

I see and yes there are that as well.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

https://fullfact.org/health/mrna-covid-vaccine/

So if that's the link for the full facts, why haven't they listed the ingredients and what they are or any possible or known side effects? Not the full facts as I can't find them anywhere on that link.

Try reading the published study notes of the Pfizer Covid vaccine.

No puppy dog tails, unborn children or bill gates dna"

Not yet...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"Yes, lets hope for the best, it could take 10 years or so to develop a vaccine. I am not talking about the "rush" vaccines here.

You keep quoting this line about 10 years to develop a vaccine. can you show me the phases they have missed out for the Pfizer vaccine? Are you an expert on the registration scheme for getting a vaccine to be accepted by regulatory bodies? Or are you just quoting a line you have seen in the social media?

Quite.

Lots of anti vax tropes being cited here that are delightfully evidence free"

As opposed to some rushed study and a few weeks of evidence saying it's safe..

I wonder if there has been a study on the risks associated with falling off a double decker bus and peer reviewed..

Probably not so in some people's eyes it may be safe to jump off the buss. There is no evidence to suggest it's dangerous

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Want this to be true, but starting to fall suspiciously into “too good to be true”. There’s been no setbacks no negative data, no problems at all producing something that has never been done before and is experimental. An producing unprecedented results.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Want this to be true, but starting to fall suspiciously into “too good to be true”. There’s been no setbacks no negative data, no problems at all producing something that has never been done before and is experimental. An producing unprecedented results. "

Err I know of at least two vaccine trial pauses, and we're not privy to the data like we aren't privy to the data in most scientific research projects

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Like all walks of life.. some will willingly follow, some will blindly follow, some will never follow.

But in the Valley of the Blind, a Man with one Eye can be King

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice. "

The vaccine doesn't alter your DNA, that myth has been debunked repeatedly.

The aborted foetus was some cells taken 60 years ago and all human vaccines have used artificially grown cells from that sample.

The family of that woman, who unfortunately died of cancer some time later, are hugely proud of the impact their ancestor has had on mankind.

As for cultural, religious and ethical issues - I have seen none outside of the rubbish that antivaxers spout to get attention for their so called 'cause'.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

The vaccine doesn't alter your DNA, that myth has been debunked repeatedly.

The aborted foetus was some cells taken 60 years ago and all human vaccines have used artificially grown cells from that sample.

The family of that woman, who unfortunately died of cancer some time later, are hugely proud of the impact their ancestor has had on mankind.

As for cultural, religious and ethical issues - I have seen none outside of the rubbish that antivaxers spout to get attention for their so called 'cause'."

I'm pretty sure the Catholic church have come out in support of the vaccines from aborted foetal cell lines. It's done, and the benefit outweighs the (perceived) harm.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

The vaccine doesn't alter your DNA, that myth has been debunked repeatedly.

The aborted foetus was some cells taken 60 years ago and all human vaccines have used artificially grown cells from that sample.

The family of that woman, who unfortunately died of cancer some time later, are hugely proud of the impact their ancestor has had on mankind.

As for cultural, religious and ethical issues - I have seen none outside of the rubbish that antivaxers spout to get attention for their so called 'cause'.

I'm pretty sure the Catholic church have come out in support of the vaccines from aborted foetal cell lines. It's done, and the benefit outweighs the (perceived) harm."

Or to some.. the (perceived) benefits outweigh the harm

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

The vaccine doesn't alter your DNA, that myth has been debunked repeatedly.

The aborted foetus was some cells taken 60 years ago and all human vaccines have used artificially grown cells from that sample.

The family of that woman, who unfortunately died of cancer some time later, are hugely proud of the impact their ancestor has had on mankind.

As for cultural, religious and ethical issues - I have seen none outside of the rubbish that antivaxers spout to get attention for their so called 'cause'.

I'm pretty sure the Catholic church have come out in support of the vaccines from aborted foetal cell lines. It's done, and the benefit outweighs the (perceived) harm.

Or to some.. the (perceived) benefits outweigh the harm "

I believe that that's the position of the Catholic church.

I see no harm at all.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ountry Boy FreshMan
over a year ago

Huddersfield


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

The vaccine doesn't alter your DNA, that myth has been debunked repeatedly.

The aborted foetus was some cells taken 60 years ago and all human vaccines have used artificially grown cells from that sample.

The family of that woman, who unfortunately died of cancer some time later, are hugely proud of the impact their ancestor has had on mankind.

As for cultural, religious and ethical issues - I have seen none outside of the rubbish that antivaxers spout to get attention for their so called 'cause'."

You won't put a good conspiracy theory down though.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *hagTonightMan
over a year ago

From the land of haribos.


"Yes, lets hope for the best, it could take 10 years or so to develop a vaccine. I am not talking about the "rush" vaccines here.

You keep quoting this line about 10 years to develop a vaccine. can you show me the phases they have missed out for the Pfizer vaccine? Are you an expert on the registration scheme for getting a vaccine to be accepted by regulatory bodies? Or are you just quoting a line you have seen in the social media?

Quite.

Lots of anti vax tropes being cited here that are delightfully evidence free

As opposed to some rushed study and a few weeks of evidence saying it's safe..

I wonder if there has been a study on the risks associated with falling off a double decker bus and peer reviewed..

Probably not so in some people's eyes it may be safe to jump off the buss. There is no evidence to suggest it's dangerous"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Quite interesting that the cobra effect may kick in here.. the law of unintended consequences..

So 100 people get injected with this so called vaccine. Previously, they made sensible precautions, avoided gyms and crowded places..and never caught covid.. they get fed this syrum and feel bulletproof.. off to crowded places.. yippeee...

But they are one of the ten and not one of the ninety..

Cobra effect kicks in...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

The vaccine doesn't alter your DNA, that myth has been debunked repeatedly.

The aborted foetus was some cells taken 60 years ago and all human vaccines have used artificially grown cells from that sample.

The family of that woman, who unfortunately died of cancer some time later, are hugely proud of the impact their ancestor has had on mankind.

As for cultural, religious and ethical issues - I have seen none outside of the rubbish that antivaxers spout to get attention for their so called 'cause'.

You won't put a good conspiracy theory down though. "

Yes. One prominent anti vaxxer reckons that the aliens are behind it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

[Removed by poster at 18/11/20 15:42:11]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ontecristoMan
over a year ago

PonteCarlo


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

The vaccine doesn't alter your DNA, that myth has been debunked repeatedly.

The aborted foetus was some cells taken 60 years ago and all human vaccines have used artificially grown cells from that sample.

The family of that woman, who unfortunately died of cancer some time later, are hugely proud of the impact their ancestor has had on mankind.

As for cultural, religious and ethical issues - I have seen none outside of the rubbish that antivaxers spout to get attention for their so called 'cause'.

You won't put a good conspiracy theory down though.

Yes. One prominent anti vaxxer reckons that the aliens are behind it."

It beggars belief what some people come up with.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire


"Quite interesting that the cobra effect may kick in here.. the law of unintended consequences..

So 100 people get injected with this so called vaccine. Previously, they made sensible precautions, avoided gyms and crowded places..and never caught covid.. they get fed this syrum and feel bulletproof.. off to crowded places.. yippeee...

But they are one of the ten and not one of the ninety..

Cobra effect kicks in..."

That's true of all vaccines.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

The vaccine doesn't alter your DNA, that myth has been debunked repeatedly.

The aborted foetus was some cells taken 60 years ago and all human vaccines have used artificially grown cells from that sample.

The family of that woman, who unfortunately died of cancer some time later, are hugely proud of the impact their ancestor has had on mankind.

As for cultural, religious and ethical issues - I have seen none outside of the rubbish that antivaxers spout to get attention for their so called 'cause'.

You won't put a good conspiracy theory down though. "

No.

It's actually a psychological disorder called apophenia...

...although that'll probably be a conspiracy as well...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

The vaccine doesn't alter your DNA, that myth has been debunked repeatedly.

The aborted foetus was some cells taken 60 years ago and all human vaccines have used artificially grown cells from that sample.

The family of that woman, who unfortunately died of cancer some time later, are hugely proud of the impact their ancestor has had on mankind.

As for cultural, religious and ethical issues - I have seen none outside of the rubbish that antivaxers spout to get attention for their so called 'cause'.

You won't put a good conspiracy theory down though.

Yes. One prominent anti vaxxer reckons that the aliens are behind it.

It beggars belief what some people come up with. "

All this anti vax stuff is in the same category for me. Just degrees of

We trust health agencies to give us clean water, safe medicine, unadulterated over the counter painkillers, etc etc etc. And all of these things have had fuck ups over time, which got fixed.

But vaccines are somehow mind control mark of the beast alien genocide causing something or other because... I dunno.

Or maybe they reduce illness or stop infections and give us all a lifespan our ancestors would envy?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Scientists are taught to question, question, question..

But dare question the science and some people go into a tailspin...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"Scientists are taught to question, question, question..

But dare question the science and some people go into a tailspin..."

People can question the science all they like, as long as they don't ignore facts whilst pushing debunked beliefs.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

I am not sure that qurstioning makes anyone anti Vax but blind faith in any authority belongs in the 1950s in my opinion

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Scientists are taught to question, question, question..

But dare question the science and some people go into a tailspin...

People can question the science all they like, as long as they don't ignore facts whilst pushing debunked beliefs."

Yes.

"Mummy, how does the car work" is a good question

"Mummy, I heard at school that glitter makes your car work better, so I'm going to put glitter in your petrol tank and most of my class are going to do the same" isn't.

Anti vax nonsense is like glitter in the petrol tank.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"Scientists are taught to question, question, question..

But dare question the science and some people go into a tailspin...

People can question the science all they like, as long as they don't ignore facts whilst pushing debunked beliefs.

Yes.

"Mummy, how does the car work" is a good question

"Mummy, I heard at school that glitter makes your car work better, so I'm going to put glitter in your petrol tank and most of my class are going to do the same" isn't.

Anti vax nonsense is like glitter in the petrol tank."

don't be putting glitter in my tank!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Scientists are taught to question, question, question..

But dare question the science and some people go into a tailspin...

People can question the science all they like, as long as they don't ignore facts whilst pushing debunked beliefs.

Yes.

"Mummy, how does the car work" is a good question

"Mummy, I heard at school that glitter makes your car work better, so I'm going to put glitter in your petrol tank and most of my class are going to do the same" isn't.

Anti vax nonsense is like glitter in the petrol tank.

don't be putting glitter in my tank! "

Well yeah exactly

Kid doesn't know any better, most people don't know the ins and outs of vaccines either, fine, that's not bad.

Spreading stuff that damages cars/ people/ public health is not fine.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It amazes us how many quote figures and use them to scare people..

The flu vaccine is totally different to the vaccines being developed. None of the vaccines in final stages of testing are using live any live virus..the flu virus mutates far quicker than covid has to date and because there are so many strings of flu the vaccine is a best guess to beat which will emerge this year...science and genetics have progressed so much since previous mass vaccines where developed. We will tke the vaccine if its offered to us..

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"It amazes us how many quote figures and use them to scare people..

The flu vaccine is totally different to the vaccines being developed. None of the vaccines in final stages of testing are using live any live virus..the flu virus mutates far quicker than covid has to date and because there are so many strings of flu the vaccine is a best guess to beat which will emerge this year...science and genetics have progressed so much since previous mass vaccines where developed. We will tke the vaccine if its offered to us.."

Well said.

Also the amount of money that's been thrown at this to get a public health solution is monumental.

And the "new" mRNA technology is 1990 new. So. Not last week.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eddy and legsCouple
over a year ago

the wetlands


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

The vaccine doesn't alter your DNA, that myth has been debunked repeatedly.

The aborted foetus was some cells taken 60 years ago and all human vaccines have used artificially grown cells from that sample.

The family of that woman, who unfortunately died of cancer some time later, are hugely proud of the impact their ancestor has had on mankind.

As for cultural, religious and ethical issues - I have seen none outside of the rubbish that antivaxers spout to get attention for their so called 'cause'.

You won't put a good conspiracy theory down though.

Yes. One prominent anti vaxxer reckons that the aliens are behind it."

The aliens are much too intelligent to talk to those fukwits

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"No vaccine here ... I recommend listening to Prof Dolores Cahill ....

Yes I saw that. Genetic materiel taken from an aborted 14 week old male fetus. A vaccine that alters your dna? So many cultural, religious and ethical issues with this. Still want the vaccine? Go ahead, I won't be. But then that's the wonderful thing about free will and being allowed choice.

The vaccine doesn't alter your DNA, that myth has been debunked repeatedly.

The aborted foetus was some cells taken 60 years ago and all human vaccines have used artificially grown cells from that sample.

The family of that woman, who unfortunately died of cancer some time later, are hugely proud of the impact their ancestor has had on mankind.

As for cultural, religious and ethical issues - I have seen none outside of the rubbish that antivaxers spout to get attention for their so called 'cause'.

You won't put a good conspiracy theory down though.

Yes. One prominent anti vaxxer reckons that the aliens are behind it.

The aliens are much too intelligent to talk to those fukwits "

They're talking to Bill Gates and whoever about wiping out the earth's population etc etc (I only read a takedown of this because I don't think my brain could handle that much stupid)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eddy and legsCouple
over a year ago

the wetlands


"Want this to be true, but starting to fall suspiciously into “too good to be true”. There’s been no setbacks no negative data, no problems at all producing something that has never been done before and is experimental. An producing unprecedented results. "

The concept was first trialled over 30 years ago so it's not that new.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *imes_berksMan
over a year ago

Bracknell


"Yes, lets hope for the best, it could take 10 years or so to develop a vaccine. I am not talking about the "rush" vaccines here.

You keep quoting this line about 10 years to develop a vaccine. can you show me the phases they have missed out for the Pfizer vaccine? Are you an expert on the registration scheme for getting a vaccine to be accepted by regulatory bodies? Or are you just quoting a line you have seen in the social media?

Quite.

Lots of anti vax tropes being cited here that are delightfully evidence free

As opposed to some rushed study and a few weeks of evidence saying it's safe..

I wonder if there has been a study on the risks associated with falling off a double decker bus and peer reviewed..

Probably not so in some people's eyes it may be safe to jump off the buss. There is no evidence to suggest it's dangerous"

You obviously have no idea what the regulations are for getting a vaccine onto the market. The regulators will not allow anything onto the market that has not been tested and reviewed properly. I work in a similar field and I know how hard it is to get something registered. As stated by others the phases have been run in parallel with plenty of volunteers.

But please do come back with another dodgy analogy and I look forward to reading how you get on with your bus diving

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

I watched a barrister grilling a young engineer over the data provided to prove that their building cladding was safe and fire resistant/proof. Data skewed for profit..

I don't trust drug companies.. only interested in the profit and not the guinea pigs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *imes_berksMan
over a year ago

Bracknell


"I watched a barrister grilling a young engineer over the data provided to prove that their building cladding was safe and fire resistant/proof. Data skewed for profit..

I don't trust drug companies.. only interested in the profit and not the guinea pigs "

Yep that's right. Everyone thst works for them is a scheisster with no morals or scruples. None of the drugs they produce have to pass rigorous tests and PLCM over the years.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eddy and legsCouple
over a year ago

the wetlands


"I watched a barrister grilling a young engineer over the data provided to prove that their building cladding was safe and fire resistant/proof. Data skewed for profit..

I don't trust drug companies.. only interested in the profit and not the guinea pigs "

There's an awful lot of distrust there ....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ornyQueer OP   Woman
over a year ago

.....

Got my first vaccine

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Brilliant

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ornyQueer OP   Woman
over a year ago

.....

When is it okay to meet people from here?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"When is it okay to meet people from here?"

When it's okay to meet in the general populace. Current rules are "rule of 6" outdoors here in England. No indoor visits. Social distancing outdoors etc.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"When is it okay to meet people from here?"

Now, socially distanced according to the law.

In terms of individual safety for up close, two doses plus three weeks.

Intimate meets are awhile off.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

(my answer is based on England)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"the problem is most vaccines take at least 10 years to be close to 100% effective.

even the current flu vaccine is only around 48% effective so any covid-19 vaccine (that has been rushed) cannot achieve a high rate of success.

lets say they get a vaccine out in jan and say they want to have everyone injected with it by easter.

you would need to inject 600,000 people a week and you must be dreaming if you think they can produce and treat that many people each week.

the governments view is a vaccine over or close to 50% successful is acceptable. but acceptable to who? and what about the people how have a bad reaction to it.

you will not be able to sue because they will legally cover that so you may end up with people suffering serious side effects that are life changing with little chance of any quality of life or care.

when you have clowns in charge you get a circus. they dont know what that are doing from one week to the next and your going to let them inject you with something that has not been throughly tested or can achieve a a close to 100% safe rate.

the current death rate from covid-19 is less than people who die from cigarette annually but they are still on the shelves.

we need to exercise caution."

i agree also evidence out that some people die from jab if get bloodclot was on news lastnight there responce oh it may be 1 in 5000 could die great but what if u the one be like rushian roulet i bullet in revolver and spun see if it goes band whe pull triger

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"the problem is most vaccines take at least 10 years to be close to 100% effective.

even the current flu vaccine is only around 48% effective so any covid-19 vaccine (that has been rushed) cannot achieve a high rate of success.

lets say they get a vaccine out in jan and say they want to have everyone injected with it by easter.

you would need to inject 600,000 people a week and you must be dreaming if you think they can produce and treat that many people each week.

the governments view is a vaccine over or close to 50% successful is acceptable. but acceptable to who? and what about the people how have a bad reaction to it.

you will not be able to sue because they will legally cover that so you may end up with people suffering serious side effects that are life changing with little chance of any quality of life or care.

when you have clowns in charge you get a circus. they dont know what that are doing from one week to the next and your going to let them inject you with something that has not been throughly tested or can achieve a a close to 100% safe rate.

the current death rate from covid-19 is less than people who die from cigarette annually but they are still on the shelves.

we need to exercise caution.i agree also evidence out that some people die from jab if get bloodclot was on news lastnight there responce oh it may be 1 in 5000 could die great but what if u the one be like rushian roulet i bullet in revolver and spun see if it goes band whe pull triger"

It's better odds than Covid

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ittleMissCaliWoman
over a year ago

all loved up


"the problem is most vaccines take at least 10 years to be close to 100% effective.

even the current flu vaccine is only around 48% effective so any covid-19 vaccine (that has been rushed) cannot achieve a high rate of success.

lets say they get a vaccine out in jan and say they want to have everyone injected with it by easter.

you would need to inject 600,000 people a week and you must be dreaming if you think they can produce and treat that many people each week.

the governments view is a vaccine over or close to 50% successful is acceptable. but acceptable to who? and what about the people how have a bad reaction to it.

you will not be able to sue because they will legally cover that so you may end up with people suffering serious side effects that are life changing with little chance of any quality of life or care.

when you have clowns in charge you get a circus. they dont know what that are doing from one week to the next and your going to let them inject you with something that has not been throughly tested or can achieve a a close to 100% safe rate.

the current death rate from covid-19 is less than people who die from cigarette annually but they are still on the shelves.

we need to exercise caution.i agree also evidence out that some people die from jab if get bloodclot was on news lastnight there responce oh it may be 1 in 5000 could die great but what if u the one be like rushian roulet i bullet in revolver and spun see if it goes band whe pull triger"

Curious as to where the 1 in 5000 came from as its actually stupidly higher than that.. as in 1 in something million.. cant remember the exact figures. And... as a certain percentage of people will just develop a blood clot regardless of anything... there is not actually proof it was caused directly by the vaccine. But as the deaths or incidents of the blood clots happened within 28 days of having the vaccine it's being looked at.

As someone at risk of blood clots, I did research this quite a lot before having my 2nd vaccine and read a lot of the reports on this.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

I read that it's lower than the background level in the population.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
back to top