Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Virus |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Possibly but it depends what you class as more I wouldn't pay a fiver for a loaf of bread. " £10 plus virus surcharge It was a hypothetical question, as companies don't have to charge more. I'd more willingly buy from a business that I knew was doing this, than if owned or run by some egotistical gobshite who didn't and was proud of proclaiming it. Ethical sourcing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Possibly but it depends what you class as more I wouldn't pay a fiver for a loaf of bread. £10 plus virus surcharge It was a hypothetical question, as companies don't have to charge more. I'd more willingly buy from a business that I knew was doing this, than if owned or run by some egotistical gobshite who didn't and was proud of proclaiming it. Ethical sourcing. " We have that for environmental issues now I don't see any problem in paying a little extra though some companies see the "ethical" tag as an excuse to up profits and prices above what the cost of things are. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would you pay more to do business with an organisation that paid their staff in full, when they need to isolate? Statutory Sick Pay is now payable from the first day but obviously is not the income level that people rely on for rent, food, energy etc. We know that poorer members of society pay more for energy, due to prepayment meters and they have to pay it upfront, which means you have to have income. With winter coming, people needing to isolate for the benefit of all, should get guaranteed income that's equivalent to their relied on pay. " The cynic in me would think that because the company is able to pay full salary it was making to much profit and I should shop around. If they openly suggested increasing prices for a limited time by 10% and were historically competitive then maybe. Short answer, probably not. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some firms are in dire straights and they wouldn't be able to afford to pay full wages to everyone who self isolates. We have to be mindful that business's are not blacklisted for something they can't o" It's very true, it's such a dire picture around much of the business community. I'd prefer the government to repay organisations for their payments to employees and, presumably, many of them have already got channels for furlough money claims. I'd be drawn to businesses that said they'd do this, especially if it came from Directors' bonuses and price differentials were 1% or 2%, perhaps 10% max. Didn't some businesses used to proclaim that they were paying their staff this way? I'm sure I've seen it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would you pay more to do business with an organisation that paid their staff in full, when they need to isolate? Statutory Sick Pay is now payable from the first day but obviously is not the income level that people rely on for rent, food, energy etc. We know that poorer members of society pay more for energy, due to prepayment meters and they have to pay it upfront, which means you have to have income. With winter coming, people needing to isolate for the benefit of all, should get guaranteed income that's equivalent to their relied on pay. " It’s a tough one, but I probably would. The thing that’s upset me is that I’ve seen (only in the media I admit) some share holders still demanding multi million pay outs on dividends of large companies. Money that could pay staff. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would you pay more to do business with an organisation that paid their staff in full, when they need to isolate? Statutory Sick Pay is now payable from the first day but obviously is not the income level that people rely on for rent, food, energy etc. We know that poorer members of society pay more for energy, due to prepayment meters and they have to pay it upfront, which means you have to have income. With winter coming, people needing to isolate for the benefit of all, should get guaranteed income that's equivalent to their relied on pay. It’s a tough one, but I probably would. The thing that’s upset me is that I’ve seen (only in the media I admit) some share holders still demanding multi million pay outs on dividends of large companies. Money that could pay staff." For some dividends pay their pension income | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think lots of people will say they will pay more. When it comes to opening their wallet, different story. " Income-wise, some of us don't have the luxury of choice. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Would you pay more to do business with an organisation that paid their staff in full, when they need to isolate? Statutory Sick Pay is now payable from the first day but obviously is not the income level that people rely on for rent, food, energy etc. We know that poorer members of society pay more for energy, due to prepayment meters and they have to pay it upfront, which means you have to have income. With winter coming, people needing to isolate for the benefit of all, should get guaranteed income that's equivalent to their relied on pay. " Impossible to answer as do I trust companies they make all sorts of excuses for bad service allready | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And when these companies were making tidy profits, did they pass a percentage of their profit on as a discount to customers? Probably a very unpopular opinion but, in these times of uncertainty from a financial perspective its every man for himself. I certainly wouldn't be paying a premium for goods or services when our own income source isn't guaranteed to weather the storm. " I'd hope that we didn't have to pay more but would err on paying a little bit extra, if I trusted all staff would be encouraged to stay home, on full pay, to keep customers, staff and the business healthy. Anyone recall any organisations emohasising that they are doing this? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |