FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Virus

Leeds, Liverpool and London next?

Jump to newest
 

By *allgirthy OP   Man
over a year ago

Harrogate

The Daily Mail mentioned all of the three above could be next in line for further restrictions, but I wonder if most blanket national policies might now come into force before that happens?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostafunMan
over a year ago

near ipswich

Why should parts of the country who have been following the rules and have low cases suffer? just shut down the places who are spreading it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allgirthy OP   Man
over a year ago

Harrogate


"Why should parts of the country who have been following the rules and have low cases suffer? just shut down the places who are spreading it."

Not sure it’s quite so black and white as that. Things will always spread quicker in densely populated areas than the countryside, and both places will have those that comply and those that don’t within them. Still, the local approach is what they’ve tried to go with but I presume it may soon go beyond being locally containable.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

Lancashire is imminent according to the BBC but just limitations on hospitality hours seems not to have worked in places like Bolton so suspect national closure of all will also be announced by Boris..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Seems to be spreading more in asian parts of the uk, nothing in the media really explains why this is, any thoughts?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Seems to be spreading more in asian parts of the uk, nothing in the media really explains why this is, any thoughts?"

Glasgow and Newcastle?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eneral HysteriaMan
over a year ago

Newcastle


"Why should parts of the country who have been following the rules and have low cases suffer? just shut down the places who are spreading it."

Those with tighter restrictions haven't necessarily been not following the rules. Check out stats for Northumberland.

Children who have been sent to school, people who have been given half price nights out by the Chancellor haven't necessarily broken rules.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"Why should parts of the country who have been following the rules and have low cases suffer? just shut down the places who are spreading it.

Not sure it’s quite so black and white as that. Things will always spread quicker in densely populated areas than the countryside, and both places will have those that comply and those that don’t within them. Still, the local approach is what they’ve tried to go with but I presume it may soon go beyond being locally containable."

You'd think so... Yet London always had consistently lower infection rates... For the first 4 months anyway

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top