Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Virus |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do you think will happen? I am not sure but I also reckon that the descion about it comes after they had an anti mask protest there, in the report they said it is an area of concern if it would be a lockdown there." The Conspiricists will probably tell you that it's 'payback' for protesting. More likely it will just be the Government helping to keep people safe by restricting how many people you can meet etc. Of the ones that they have done so far they have been out of it in two weeks.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not the only one.... the council next to mine (south tyneside) is on the list... and the one that i live in (gateshead) is really lucky not to be on the list... we are the "next council" down on the list so to speak... scare thing is... we were at a rate higher that the greater manchester outbreak but we have been spared.. so far!" Decisions are very random depending on local councils. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why am I not surprised? "Dead" Virus Cells Frequently Trigger "False Positives" In Most Common COVID Test, New Study Finds" And these "False Positives" are *only* showing up in specific areas, not other areas? even though the same level of testing is taking place everywhere? Why am I not surprised?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And these "False Positives" are *only* showing up in specific areas, not other areas? even though the same level of testing is taking place everywhere? Why am I not surprised? "Which means? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And these "False Positives" are *only* showing up in specific areas, not other areas? even though the same level of testing is taking place everywhere? Why am I not surprised?
Which means?"Means nothing, I was just asking a question to the previous poster who assumes that the rise in cases is mainly due to "False Positives" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And these "False Positives" are *only* showing up in specific areas, not other areas? even though the same level of testing is taking place everywhere? Why am I not surprised?
Which means?
Means nothing, I was just asking a question to the previous poster who assumes that the rise in cases is mainly due to "False Positives""Gotcha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And keep more people alive - better for their families huh?"  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's more folks dying from other things than covid. " Yea. So let's pretend Covid isn't there. Their families would love that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"False positives are safer than false negatives." If we’re going to use data to drive policy then it helps if its good data. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's more folks dying from other things than covid. Yea. So let's pretend Covid isn't there. Their families would love that." This | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"False positives are safer than false negatives. If we’re going to use data to drive policy then it helps if its good data." But if it's the best we currently have... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah sure they are, just create more shutdown chaos, wreck more folks businesses." Well as you introduced the 'false positives' topic, what percentage of them are false? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah sure they are, just create more shutdown chaos, wreck more folks businesses. Well as you introduced the 'false positives' topic, what percentage of them are false?" https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-tests-dead-virus-cells-false-positives-over-estimating-size-a9706501.html Can't find the original post . . . this this is a copy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's more folks dying from other things than covid. " How about the long haulers? The permanent lung damage? Heart? Coma patients? The inability to walk or feed themselves .. it’s not just about dying of it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah sure they are, just create more shutdown chaos, wreck more folks businesses. Well as you introduced the 'false positives' topic, what percentage of them are false? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-tests-dead-virus-cells-false-positives-over-estimating-size-a9706501.html Can't find the original post . . . this this is a copy." Ta
First thing that strikes me is it's described as a theory, so to my non-scientific mind, the word 'theory' means not yet proven.
Lot's of 'could's' in the report kinda underlines that.
It appears they *could* reduce the false positives BUT they *could* also increase false negatives as a result.
Seems there's more work neeed as there's a lot of guesswork going on around it at the moment.
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah sure they are, just create more shutdown chaos, wreck more folks businesses. Well as you introduced the 'false positives' topic, what percentage of them are false? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-tests-dead-virus-cells-false-positives-over-estimating-size-a9706501.html Can't find the original post . . . this this is a copy. Ta
First thing that strikes me is it's described as a theory, so to my non-scientific mind, the word 'theory' means not yet proven.
Lot's of 'could's' in the report kinda underlines that.
It appears they *could* reduce the false positives BUT they *could* also increase false negatives as a result.
Seems there's more work neeed as there's a lot of guesswork going on around it at the moment.
"
The whole basis for the lockdown was based on a theory. It was based on modelling which is certainly not foolproof, especially when there are now questions being asked if it was based on case fatality rate or infection fatality rate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They are going to be fuming if they cant go the boozer to watch the game on sat" They will just go but outside of Leeds if they are shut | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're more likely to get run over by a bus, than die of Corona!" You should copyright that before someone else uses it...  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're more likely to get run over by a bus, than die of Corona!" Do you look to see what’s coming before crossing the road? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They are going to be fuming if they cant go the boozer to watch the game on sat They will just go but outside of Leeds if they are shut " Spreading it further. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
