Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Virus |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes." Thought so. Then explain to me why nearly every country was purchasing covid 19 testing kits in 2018 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes. Thought so. Then explain to me why nearly every country was purchasing covid 19 testing kits in 2018 " Specific covid-19 test kits? If so whats your source please | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That doesn't explain why countrys was purchasing a pruduct titled covid 19 testing kits in 2018. Somthing smells fishy" And the proof that they were COVID 19 kits? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes. Thought so. Then explain to me why nearly every country was purchasing covid 19 testing kits in 2018 Specific covid-19 test kits? If so whats your source please" Yes, cite sources please. There's no such thing as a Covid-19 test kit. There are swab kits which could be used to take a wide variety of samples. The "test" is carried out using PCR, which is a molecular biology technique that can compare any genetic material to a known sample. The machinery and reagents required are the same, no matter what the sample is. So, both of things needed for diagnostic testing could also be used for other types of testing and also for research purposes. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes. Thought so. Then explain to me why nearly every country was purchasing covid 19 testing kits in 2018 Specific covid-19 test kits? If so whats your source please Yes, cite sources please. There's no such thing as a Covid-19 test kit. There are swab kits which could be used to take a wide variety of samples. The "test" is carried out using PCR, which is a molecular biology technique that can compare any genetic material to a known sample. The machinery and reagents required are the same, no matter what the sample is. So, both of things needed for diagnostic testing could also be used for other types of testing and also for research purposes. " Im not sure if the worldbank trading and exports site is a link thats allowed so just type in product 902780 and it will take you to the link you need to see for yourself | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes. Thought so. Then explain to me why nearly every country was purchasing covid 19 testing kits in 2018 " If you have sourced that from a credible source, I assume that you have already sourced details of the times and dates that covid-19 appeared op? You're referring to covid-19 testing kits from 2018, so reputable sources will be invaluable of course | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes. Thought so. Then explain to me why nearly every country was purchasing covid 19 testing kits in 2018 Specific covid-19 test kits? If so whats your source please I won't link it incase its not allowed. But if you type into google product 902780 then click the one worldbank link that says covid 19 diagnostic test instruments. If takes you to a chart of all the countrys that bought covid 19 testing kits in 2018" Clearly that product code for the World Trade Organisation had its description updated since Covid. The same code links to "Instruments and apparatus for physical or chemical analysis" Instruments and apparatus for physical or chemical analysis would include thermocyclers and other instruments used in all types of molecular biology testing, including the techniques used to diagnose Covid. I'd imagine the description of the these products has been updated to better track the availability of such equipment across the globe. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes. Thought so. Then explain to me why nearly every country was purchasing covid 19 testing kits in 2018 Specific covid-19 test kits? If so whats your source please I won't link it incase its not allowed. But if you type into google product 902780 then click the one worldbank link that says covid 19 diagnostic test instruments. If takes you to a chart of all the countrys that bought covid 19 testing kits in 2018 Clearly that product code for the World Trade Organisation had its description updated since Covid. The same code links to "Instruments and apparatus for physical or chemical analysis" Instruments and apparatus for physical or chemical analysis would include thermocyclers and other instruments used in all types of molecular biology testing, including the techniques used to diagnose Covid. I'd imagine the description of the these products has been updated to better track the availability of such equipment across the globe. " Would that then suggest that the same could be said for other viruses that may appear say next year? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So all these governments went looking for test kits in 2018 and then we're caught out when it happened in relation to PPE, test and trace systems etc etc.. Smells like conspiracy thread of the day again.." Just reporting on what a others on social media are asking about this new in formation. It clearly says in the chart which countrys bought Covid 19 testing kits and apparatus and the quantity and for how much. All in the year 2018. Its just one more thing added to the list of others how much this whole thing stinks. From false data, false statistics.. All the u turns made. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So all these governments went looking for test kits in 2018 and then we're caught out when it happened in relation to PPE, test and trace systems etc etc.. Smells like conspiracy thread of the day again.. Just reporting on what a others on social media are asking about this new in formation. It clearly says in the chart which countrys bought Covid 19 testing kits and apparatus and the quantity and for how much. All in the year 2018. Its just one more thing added to the list of others how much this whole thing stinks. From false data, false statistics.. All the u turns made. " Someone already solved it so you can chill out now and stop seeing shadows around every corner. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was very curious until I found . . . Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis. If you search Trade interdependencies in Covid-19 goods - and read the whole abstract. Solved. " Cheers Cat, how easy was it to find? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From the source page that the OP provided I searched OECD. Just in case you want to fllow my trail. " Followed it. I wont pretend i understand it all but I'm happy to hold my hands up when im wrong. I still think the whole thing stinks overall though. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So all these governments went looking for test kits in 2018 and then we're caught out when it happened in relation to PPE, test and trace systems etc etc.. Smells like conspiracy thread of the day again.. Just reporting on what a others on social media are asking about this new in formation. It clearly says in the chart which countrys bought Covid 19 testing kits and apparatus and the quantity and for how much. All in the year 2018. Its just one more thing added to the list of others how much this whole thing stinks. From false data, false statistics.. All the u turns made. Someone already solved it so you can chill out now and stop seeing shadows around every corner. " Im not seeing shadows around every corner but i will coninue to question everything. Thank you for your concern though | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was very curious until I found . . . Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis. If you search Trade interdependencies in Covid-19 goods - and read the whole abstract. Solved. Cheers Cat, how easy was it to find?" Err about 24 mins between Feeding my Cat and opnening the door to the Amazon Delivery Chap. The data is aggregate world trade data. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So all these governments went looking for test kits in 2018 and then we're caught out when it happened in relation to PPE, test and trace systems etc etc.. Smells like conspiracy thread of the day again.. Just reporting on what a others on social media are asking about this new in formation. It clearly says in the chart which countrys bought Covid 19 testing kits and apparatus and the quantity and for how much. All in the year 2018. Its just one more thing added to the list of others how much this whole thing stinks. From false data, false statistics.. All the u turns made. Someone already solved it so you can chill out now and stop seeing shadows around every corner. Im not seeing shadows around every corner but i will coninue to question everything. Thank you for your concern though " This is a genuine question but why question everything? Why look for negatives in a world that's already full of them? Why hunt out reasons to be offended and angry? I honestly don't get it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"19 relates to the 19th strain of Covid virus.not the year." That's not correct. The 19 stands for the year it was named. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cdcresponse/about-COVID-19.html | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was very curious until I found . . . Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis. If you search Trade interdependencies in Covid-19 goods - and read the whole abstract. Solved. Cheers Cat, how easy was it to find? Err about 24 mins between Feeding my Cat and opnening the door to the Amazon Delivery Chap. The data is aggregate world trade data." Cheers.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To to make clear this wasn't my quote 'Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis.' It's from the OECD page." I went and relayed this information to one of the groups that this link is being shared around on social media. Im fine with questioning everything but aslong as its with good data and facts. Seems this link to the purchase of covid 19 tests in 2018 is a red herring and im happy to admit when im wrong. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To to make clear this wasn't my quote 'Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis.' It's from the OECD page. I went and relayed this information to one of the groups that this link is being shared around on social media. Im fine with questioning everything but aslong as its with good data and facts. Seems this link to the purchase of covid 19 tests in 2018 is a red herring and im happy to admit when im wrong." Takes a big man to hold his hands up and admit he was wrong, so fair play to you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was very curious until I found . . . Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis. If you search Trade interdependencies in Covid-19 goods - and read the whole abstract. Solved. Cheers Cat, how easy was it to find? Err about 24 mins between Feeding my Cat and opnening the door to the Amazon Delivery Chap. The data is aggregate world trade data." Thank you for doing the ‘dirty’ work for us all, I really didn’t feel like doing it myself, it’s as if I almost knew beforehand how this was going to turn out | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To to make clear this wasn't my quote 'Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis.' It's from the OECD page. I went and relayed this information to one of the groups that this link is being shared around on social media. Im fine with questioning everything but aslong as its with good data and facts. Seems this link to the purchase of covid 19 tests in 2018 is a red herring and im happy to admit when im wrong." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was very curious until I found . . . Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis. If you search Trade interdependencies in Covid-19 goods - and read the whole abstract. Solved. Cheers Cat, how easy was it to find? Err about 24 mins between Feeding my Cat and opnening the door to the Amazon Delivery Chap. The data is aggregate world trade data. Thank you for doing the ‘dirty’ work for us all, I really didn’t feel like doing it myself, it’s as if I almost knew beforehand how this was going to turn out" I was hoping it would sort quickly co's I was only a third of the way through a Global Trade .pdf that is 75 pages long without the notes. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was very curious until I found . . . Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis. If you search Trade interdependencies in Covid-19 goods - and read the whole abstract. Solved. Cheers Cat, how easy was it to find? Err about 24 mins between Feeding my Cat and opnening the door to the Amazon Delivery Chap. The data is aggregate world trade data. Thank you for doing the ‘dirty’ work for us all, I really didn’t feel like doing it myself, it’s as if I almost knew beforehand how this was going to turn out I was hoping it would sort quickly co's I was only a third of the way through a Global Trade .pdf that is 75 pages long without the notes. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To to make clear this wasn't my quote 'Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis.' It's from the OECD page. I went and relayed this information to one of the groups that this link is being shared around on social media. Im fine with questioning everything but aslong as its with good data and facts. Seems this link to the purchase of covid 19 tests in 2018 is a red herring and im happy to admit when im wrong." It's amazing that we have a good source of very mixed people here, who can generally evaluate things very well. Ops highlighted this well and it's interesting that we're perhaps better than many of the people who are formulating things and posting on the Internet. This period has perhaps best shown how easy it has been for misinformation to have been circulated, often reaching millions of people quickly. There are some dubious influences out there, who could stand to gain from others losses and pain. The BBC has had some content, showing the tracing of some of the earlier very widely circulated memes and distortions got to be changed, as well as where they came from. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes. Thought so. Then explain to me why nearly every country was purchasing covid 19 testing kits in 2018 Specific covid-19 test kits? If so whats your source please I won't link it incase its not allowed. But if you type into google product 902780 then click the one worldbank link that says covid 19 diagnostic test instruments. If takes you to a chart of all the countrys that bought covid 19 testing kits in 2018 Clearly that product code for the World Trade Organisation had its description updated since Covid. The same code links to "Instruments and apparatus for physical or chemical analysis" Instruments and apparatus for physical or chemical analysis would include thermocyclers and other instruments used in all types of molecular biology testing, including the techniques used to diagnose Covid. I'd imagine the description of the these products has been updated to better track the availability of such equipment across the globe. " You noted that too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To to make clear this wasn't my quote 'Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis.' It's from the OECD page. I went and relayed this information to one of the groups that this link is being shared around on social media. Im fine with questioning everything but aslong as its with good data and facts. Seems this link to the purchase of covid 19 tests in 2018 is a red herring and im happy to admit when im wrong. It's amazing that we have a good source of very mixed people here, who can generally evaluate things very well. Ops highlighted this well and it's interesting that we're perhaps better than many of the people who are formulating things and posting on the Internet. This period has perhaps best shown how easy it has been for misinformation to have been circulated, often reaching millions of people quickly. There are some dubious influences out there, who could stand to gain from others losses and pain. The BBC has had some content, showing the tracing of some of the earlier very widely circulated memes and distortions got to be changed, as well as where they came from. " To tell you the truth when I first saw the page that the op had offered as proof I really did take a sharp intake of breath and thought WTF!!! Maybe he has something here. It did take quite a bit of reading and searching to find the data that proved it realy wasn't how it first looked. But this is the problem wuith social media - they don't often do the legwork search. But as someone else said 'Fair play to the OP for seeing the error'. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was very curious until I found . . . Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis. If you search Trade interdependencies in Covid-19 goods - and read the whole abstract. Solved. Cheers Cat, how easy was it to find? Err about 24 mins between Feeding my Cat and opnening the door to the Amazing Delivery Chap. The data is aggregate world trade data." Fixed that to how I read it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If you're looking for evidence to confirm the plot you already believe exists, then that is a low bar to reach." The rest of the thread unveils all | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To to make clear this wasn't my quote 'Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis.' It's from the OECD page. I went and relayed this information to one of the groups that this link is being shared around on social media. Im fine with questioning everything but aslong as its with good data and facts. Seems this link to the purchase of covid 19 tests in 2018 is a red herring and im happy to admit when im wrong." Keep challenging and love the fact you held your hand up. That's quality. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To to make clear this wasn't my quote 'Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis.' It's from the OECD page. I went and relayed this information to one of the groups that this link is being shared around on social media. Im fine with questioning everything but aslong as its with good data and facts. Seems this link to the purchase of covid 19 tests in 2018 is a red herring and im happy to admit when im wrong." Fair play.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes, I know people that had it back then. " Best tell the world scientists they're wrong then. The first confirmed cases of coronavirus in the UK were on January 29, when two Chinese nationals fell ill at the Staycity Aparthotel in York. On February 6, a British businessman in Brighton was diagnosed with the virus after catching in in Singapore. The so-called ‘super spreader’ was later linked to 11 other cases, five of which were in the UK. Later that month, on February 28, the first person to catch coronavirus in the UK was diagnosed, a man who lived in Surrey, but who had not been abroad. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To to make clear this wasn't my quote 'Since the data refers to trade before the COVID-19, the analysis does not capture what trade in these products looks like today. It also does not include products such as the COVID-19 tests (including HS 382200 and HS 300215) which were not produced prior to the crisis.' It's from the OECD page. I went and relayed this information to one of the groups that this link is being shared around on social media. Im fine with questioning everything but aslong as its with good data and facts. Seems this link to the purchase of covid 19 tests in 2018 is a red herring and im happy to admit when im wrong." Maybe you should apply a little bit more scepticism about stuff you read on line before rushing to 'it's a conspiracy!!!' | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When was covid first discovered? Was towards the end of 2019 yes? " Depends how you look at it. Coronavirus has been around for years & is well documented. However, the current strain (mutation) is far stronger than previous iterations. So whilst this mutation is ‘new’, coronavirus is not. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When was covid first discovered? Was towards the end of 2019 yes? Depends how you look at it. Coronavirus has been around for years & is well documented. However, the current strain (mutation) is far stronger than previous iterations. So whilst this mutation is ‘new’, coronavirus is not." Coronaviruses are a family of RNA viruses named as such because their protein spikes resemble a crown when visualised with an electron microscope. Whilst all viruses in the family are loosely related, it's not exactly accurate to suggest SARS-COV-2 is just a slightly mutated form of another coronavirus. It is a effectively a "species" all of its own, although viruses don't fit the species descriptor. It's a bit like calling a horse a mutated zebra - they are both equids but are also very very different. Just remember, humans share approx 95% of their genetic sequences with mice, but we are not mutated murines. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When was covid first discovered? Was towards the end of 2019 yes? Depends how you look at it. Coronavirus has been around for years & is well documented. However, the current strain (mutation) is far stronger than previous iterations. So whilst this mutation is ‘new’, coronavirus is not. Coronaviruses are a family of RNA viruses named as such because their protein spikes resemble a crown when visualised with an electron microscope. Whilst all viruses in the family are loosely related, it's not exactly accurate to suggest SARS-COV-2 is just a slightly mutated form of another coronavirus. It is a effectively a "species" all of its own, although viruses don't fit the species descriptor. It's a bit like calling a horse a mutated zebra - they are both equids but are also very very different. Just remember, humans share approx 95% of their genetic sequences with mice, but we are not mutated murines. " Got to disagree there, horses definitely are fucked uo Zebras. Took the best bit & got rid of it! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Just remember, humans share approx 95% of their genetic sequences with mice, but we are not mutated murines. " I think some are pretty damn close though... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |