Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Virus |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lucky he is then, sadly other people don't have the same outcome"  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lucky he is then, sadly other people don't have the same outcome"
Such a shame there's a few who refuse see that.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lucky he is then, sadly other people don't have the same outcome
Such a shame there's a few who refuse see that. "Look at the couple in Florida. He thought Covid didn't exist, his wife catches it and dies from it. Both ignored guidelines regarding covid. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lucky he is then, sadly other people don't have the same outcome
Such a shame there's a few who refuse see that.
Look at the couple in Florida.
He thought Covid didn't exist, his wife catches it and dies from it. Both ignored guidelines regarding covid."I thought that was really tragic. People with some genuine grievances against ‘the state’ are whipped into a state of hysteria where any intervention is seen as an intrusion by the likes of Trump and Bannon. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Peres tested positive but was asymptomatic. He could have still passed this on to others who could have developed serious symptoms. You know this very well "WHO have been saying for months that asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Peres tested positive but was asymptomatic. He could have still passed this on to others who could have developed serious symptoms. You know this very well
WHO have been saying for months that asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare."Really? And you can provide a source for this? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Peres tested positive but was asymptomatic. He could have still passed this on to others who could have developed serious symptoms. You know this very well
WHO have been saying for months that asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare.
Really? And you can provide a source for this?"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8401121/Spread-coronavirus-people-no-symptoms-appears-RARE-official-says.html | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Peres tested positive but was asymptomatic. He could have still passed this on to others who could have developed serious symptoms. You know this very well
WHO have been saying for months that asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare.
Really? And you can provide a source for this?"I think they meant: “Who have been saying...?” | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Peres tested positive but was asymptomatic. He could have still passed this on to others who could have developed serious symptoms. You know this very well
WHO have been saying for months that asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare.
Really? And you can provide a source for this?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8401121/Spread-coronavirus-people-no-symptoms-appears-RARE-official-says.html"Any other source apart from the daily fail? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Peres tested positive but was asymptomatic. He could have still passed this on to others who could have developed serious symptoms. You know this very well
WHO have been saying for months that asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare.
Really? And you can provide a source for this?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8401121/Spread-coronavirus-people-no-symptoms-appears-RARE-official-says.html
Any other source apart from the daily fail?"Appears rare = extremely rare? You’d need a proper source. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Peres tested positive but was asymptomatic. He could have still passed this on to others who could have developed serious symptoms. You know this very well
WHO have been saying for months that asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare.
Really? And you can provide a source for this?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8401121/Spread-coronavirus-people-no-symptoms-appears-RARE-official-says.html"You call the Daily Mail a source? As for saying it for months, I think you meant hours... https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/who-comments-breed-confusion-over-asymptomatic-spread-of-covid-19-67626 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-asymptomatic-transmission-who-symptom-covid-19-a9558066.html | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Search Youtube for "WHO Says Covid-19 Asymptomatic Transmission Is ‘Very Rare’" You can watch Maria Van Kerkhove say it" you need to improve your searching skills because within a very short space of time WHO un-said it... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Search Youtube for "WHO Says Covid-19 Asymptomatic Transmission Is ‘Very Rare’" You can watch Maria Van Kerkhove say it" The issue is the more the virus is researched, the more it can be understood. What worked 2 or 3 months ago, might not now. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No they didn't. They clarified it because unsurprisingly, that news raised a few eyebrows. They didn't retract the statement though and backed their data." The guy who published the research you are referring to pointed out in response that it can't be concluded that asymptomatic people don't spread. He accused WHO of causing confusion. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have removed posts that are not allowed as they include links: From the Forum rules: Links to other sites We have restrictions on where you can link to because otherwise people end up posting spam or links to places that host malware/spyware and it's bad for our users. You can link to: Any well recognised news site (bbc, times, telegraph, sun, cnn and all the rest) Youtube Lovehoney Wikipedia" So basically only links to main stream media that are all in bed with each other are permitted. Gotcha
No wonder anyone that posts somthing that goes against or questions main stream media gets labled a tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist when asked to link source but they cant.
Ive seen people get in trouble for posting links to sites that are definitely not spam or hosting spyware/malware but just didnt fit main steam media narrative i believe one link was from thr BMJ (british medical journal).
I would ask that there is a re_iew in your rules on what can and can not be linked but only allowing "recognised" links to "bbc, the sun, sky, cnn etc is a bit silly in my opinion. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have removed posts that are not allowed as they include links: From the Forum rules: Links to other sites We have restrictions on where you can link to because otherwise people end up posting spam or links to places that host malware/spyware and it's bad for our users. You can link to: Any well recognised news site (bbc, times, telegraph, sun, cnn and all the rest) Youtube Lovehoney Wikipedia So basically only links to main stream media that are all in bed with each other are permitted. Gotcha
No wonder anyone that posts somthing that goes against or questions main stream media gets labled a tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist when asked to link source but they cant.
Ive seen people get in trouble for posting links to sites that are definitely not spam or hosting spyware/malware but just didnt fit main steam media narrative i believe one link was from thr BMJ (british medical journal).
I would ask that there is a re_iew in your rules on what can and can not be linked but only allowing "recognised" links to "bbc, the sun, sky, cnn etc is a bit silly in my opinion."The reason only recognised sites are allowed is that I could set up a web site, purporting to be a news site, post anything I like online, no matter how ridiculous and someone somewhere would believe it. That wouldn't make it true, but it could spread fear, mis information or down right dangerous lies. This would lead to a free for all and a total degradation of the quality of content. You can believe what you like from some of the weird and wonderful "truth" sites out there, doesn't make them right and it doesn't mean any site owner is obligated to allow that junk to propagate on their platform. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Recognised links' ....to websites that have been proven to provide misinformation, lies, propaganda and in the case of the BBC at least.....an organisation that enabled, employed, covered up for and lied about child abusers within their ranks! C'mon....what's so great about mainstream media site links? Why give them a seat at the top table and silence the people who try very hard to expose nonces and barefaced liers?!" They don't tell people that vaccines contain microchips and to go and set fire to 5G masts for a start. Are they perfect? Absolutely not, but even the worst are a country mile ahead of some of the absolute dross that is out there masquerading as news or information websites. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Recognised links' ....to websites that have been proven to provide misinformation, lies, propaganda and in the case of the BBC at least.....an organisation that enabled, employed, covered up for and lied about child abusers within their ranks! C'mon....what's so great about mainstream media site links? Why give them a seat at the top table and silence the people who try very hard to expose nonces and barefaced liers?! They don't tell people that vaccines contain microchips and to go and set fire to 5G masts for a start. Are they perfect? Absolutely not, but even the worst are a country mile ahead of some of the absolute dross that is out there masquerading as news or information websites." I'm not into the whole 5g brain melting stuff nor the microchip implanting theories....you fill your tinfoil boots with that nonsense....my concern is with the mainstream media being taken as gospel by sites such as this and the FACT that they lie and propagandise all the time but they are the only show in town when it comes to debate. The vast majority of people that consume news and current affairs will be fed it by the mainstream and therefore the damage caused is much greater than some lunatic in his loft spouting dubious theories about .....i dunno....lazerbeams from outer space frying the brains of children or whatever. Let folks make up their own minds as to what they believe or disbelieve. One thing's for sure the mainstream have been PROVEN time and time again to talk utter shyte to millions of people. The guy in the attic has an audience of a few dozen.....now you tell me who causes the most damage!? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have removed posts that are not allowed as they include links: From the Forum rules: Links to other sites We have restrictions on where you can link to because otherwise people end up posting spam or links to places that host malware/spyware and it's bad for our users. You can link to: Any well recognised news site (bbc, times, telegraph, sun, cnn and all the rest) Youtube Lovehoney Wikipedia" YouTube?? Hahahhahaha, gimme a break, along with Twitter that's such a cesspool of pseudoscience and conspiracy. Here's a vid someone by who says they're an expert, well must be true. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Recognised links' ....to websites that have been proven to provide misinformation, lies, propaganda and in the case of the BBC at least.....an organisation that enabled, employed, covered up for and lied about child abusers within their ranks! C'mon....what's so great about mainstream media site links? Why give them a seat at the top table and silence the people who try very hard to expose nonces and barefaced liers?! They don't tell people that vaccines contain microchips and to go and set fire to 5G masts for a start. Are they perfect? Absolutely not, but even the worst are a country mile ahead of some of the absolute dross that is out there masquerading as news or information websites. I'm not into the whole 5g brain melting stuff nor the microchip implanting theories....you fill your tinfoil boots with that nonsense....my concern is with the mainstream media being taken as gospel by sites such as this and the FACT that they lie and propagandise all the time but they are the only show in town when it comes to debate. The vast majority of people that consume news and current affairs will be fed it by the mainstream and therefore the damage caused is much greater than some lunatic in his loft spouting dubious theories about .....i dunno....lazerbeams from outer space frying the brains of children or whatever. Let folks make up their own minds as to what they believe or disbelieve. One thing's for sure the mainstream have been PROVEN time and time again to talk utter shyte to millions of people. The guy in the attic has an audience of a few dozen.....now you tell me who causes the most damage!?" If you let a free for all start, that idiot in the attic gets multiplied by thousands of idiots (believe me, there really are that many on the internet), the site gets flooded with total junk and anything even remotely approaching a debate falls apart. Main stream sites absolutely have their own agenda and paymasters using them to spin a _iew, but rarely are they outright harmful and recognised bodies are ultimately accountable to regulators and the courts. Joe blogs in his mother's basement isn't. As I said before, no news site is perfect, but compared to some out there, even the worst mainstream sites are great. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Recognised links' ....to websites that have been proven to provide misinformation, lies, propaganda and in the case of the BBC at least.....an organisation that enabled, employed, covered up for and lied about child abusers within their ranks! C'mon....what's so great about mainstream media site links? Why give them a seat at the top table and silence the people who try very hard to expose nonces and barefaced liers?! They don't tell people that vaccines contain microchips and to go and set fire to 5G masts for a start. Are they perfect? Absolutely not, but even the worst are a country mile ahead of some of the absolute dross that is out there masquerading as news or information websites. I'm not into the whole 5g brain melting stuff nor the microchip implanting theories....you fill your tinfoil boots with that nonsense....my concern is with the mainstream media being taken as gospel by sites such as this and the FACT that they lie and propagandise all the time but they are the only show in town when it comes to debate. The vast majority of people that consume news and current affairs will be fed it by the mainstream and therefore the damage caused is much greater than some lunatic in his loft spouting dubious theories about .....i dunno....lazerbeams from outer space frying the brains of children or whatever. Let folks make up their own minds as to what they believe or disbelieve. One thing's for sure the mainstream have been PROVEN time and time again to talk utter shyte to millions of people. The guy in the attic has an audience of a few dozen.....now you tell me who causes the most damage!?"
Also why are people on here using extremes like guys in attic talkimg about aliens and 5g.
Ive seen countless medical professionals both on you tube and other social media getting silenced and posts removed when trying to bring some facts and truths out about whats been going on through out all this that the main stream media isnt telling us.
More and more nurses are finslly speaking out and telling us how their wards was empty and they had very little to do.
But you won't see that on the news so you will all say its nonsense.
Well thanks to social media people can tell and share their own truths, i suggest you start searching for around for these people speaking out because ill tell you one thing you aint going to get informed of anything by watching the bbc thats for sure.
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Recognised links' ....to websites that have been proven to provide misinformation, lies, propaganda and in the case of the BBC at least.....an organisation that enabled, employed, covered up for and lied about child abusers within their ranks! C'mon....what's so great about mainstream media site links? Why give them a seat at the top table and silence the people who try very hard to expose nonces and barefaced liers?! They don't tell people that vaccines contain microchips and to go and set fire to 5G masts for a start. Are they perfect? Absolutely not, but even the worst are a country mile ahead of some of the absolute dross that is out there masquerading as news or information websites. I'm not into the whole 5g brain melting stuff nor the microchip implanting theories....you fill your tinfoil boots with that nonsense....my concern is with the mainstream media being taken as gospel by sites such as this and the FACT that they lie and propagandise all the time but they are the only show in town when it comes to debate. The vast majority of people that consume news and current affairs will be fed it by the mainstream and therefore the damage caused is much greater than some lunatic in his loft spouting dubious theories about .....i dunno....lazerbeams from outer space frying the brains of children or whatever. Let folks make up their own minds as to what they believe or disbelieve. One thing's for sure the mainstream have been PROVEN time and time again to talk utter shyte to millions of people. The guy in the attic has an audience of a few dozen.....now you tell me who causes the most damage!?
Also why are people on here using extremes like guys in attic talkimg about aliens and 5g.
Ive seen countless medical professionals both on you tube and other social media getting silenced and posts removed when trying to bring some facts and truths out about whats been going on through out all this that the main stream media isnt telling us.
More and more nurses are finslly speaking out and telling us how their wards was empty and they had very little to do.
But you won't see that on the news so you will all say its nonsense.
Well thanks to social media people can tell and share their own truths, i suggest you start searching for around for these people speaking out because ill tell you one thing you aint going to get informed of anything by watching the bbc thats for sure.
"Why would I actively seek out individual people who I don't know from Adam and assume that what they are saying is either the truth or indicative of the country as a whole? I dare say there have been instances where some medical staff had quiet periods, however personally I know a number of medical professionals who have been doing overtime and then some simply to try to cope with more than triple the normal capacity in their ICU wards. Social media is full of a lot more opinions than it is facts. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Recognised links' ....to websites that have been proven to provide misinformation, lies, propaganda and in the case of the BBC at least.....an organisation that enabled, employed, covered up for and lied about child abusers within their ranks! C'mon....what's so great about mainstream media site links? Why give them a seat at the top table and silence the people who try very hard to expose nonces and barefaced liers?! They don't tell people that vaccines contain microchips and to go and set fire to 5G masts for a start. Are they perfect? Absolutely not, but even the worst are a country mile ahead of some of the absolute dross that is out there masquerading as news or information websites. I'm not into the whole 5g brain melting stuff nor the microchip implanting theories....you fill your tinfoil boots with that nonsense....my concern is with the mainstream media being taken as gospel by sites such as this and the FACT that they lie and propagandise all the time but they are the only show in town when it comes to debate. The vast majority of people that consume news and current affairs will be fed it by the mainstream and therefore the damage caused is much greater than some lunatic in his loft spouting dubious theories about .....i dunno....lazerbeams from outer space frying the brains of children or whatever. Let folks make up their own minds as to what they believe or disbelieve. One thing's for sure the mainstream have been PROVEN time and time again to talk utter shyte to millions of people. The guy in the attic has an audience of a few dozen.....now you tell me who causes the most damage!?
Also why are people on here using extremes like guys in attic talkimg about aliens and 5g.
Ive seen countless medical professionals both on you tube and other social media getting silenced and posts removed when trying to bring some facts and truths out about whats been going on through out all this that the main stream media isnt telling us.
More and more nurses are finslly speaking out and telling us how their wards was empty and they had very little to do.
But you won't see that on the news so you will all say its nonsense.
Well thanks to social media people can tell and share their own truths, i suggest you start searching for around for these people speaking out because ill tell you one thing you aint going to get informed of anything by watching the bbc thats for sure.
Why would I actively seek out individual people who I don't know from Adam and assume that what they are saying is either the truth or indicative of the country as a whole? I dare say there have been instances where some medical staff had quiet periods, however personally I know a number of medical professionals who have been doing overtime and then some simply to try to cope with more than triple the normal capacity in their ICU wards. Social media is full of a lot more opinions than it is facts. "Why do you actively seek out bbc or (insert main stream media news programme of your choice) when wanting to inform yourself as to whats currently happening? In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I mean Perez missed 2 formula 1 races! 2! Then came back and qualified only 4th! Clearly taken its toll. " A young very fit man, recovers from covid, from the very beginning we have been told that it doesn't effect younger people so much, that it will be people who also have underlying health problems that will suffer the most... It would be expected that a young sportsman, who is fit and healthy with no underlying problems would have the best chance of recovery. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. " Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy."Sorry but no just no. If the news is reporting on an incident then i expect its footage to be truth and not a "stock image/footage" If ICU wards the world over was being massively overrun like the media portrayed it to be then they wouldnt need to use stock images/videos of anything. Let me take you back to the good ole social media of doctors/nurses that after these videos was on the news, took there own video footage in their hospitals and in wards showing a very different story before having their posts blocked/removed Anyways watch what you want, believe what you want. It will all come out soon enough. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no.
If the news is reporting on an incident then i expect its footage to be truth and not a "stock image/footage"
If ICU wards the world over was being massively overrun like the media portrayed it to be then they wouldnt need to use stock images/videos of anything.
Let me take you back to the good ole social media of doctors/nurses that after these videos was on the news, took there own video footage in their hospitals and in wards showing a very different story before having their posts blocked/removed
Anyways watch what you want, believe what you want.
It will all come out soon enough."You are aware that they don't just let TV camera crews into ICU wards full of critically sick patients in the middle of a global pandemic!? Not even all hospital staff can just waltz in and out of those areas for the safety of both themselves and the patients. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy."There's a good reason why they wouldn't let numerous tv crews wander around ICU's during a pandemic. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no.
If the news is reporting on an incident then i expect its footage to be truth and not a "stock image/footage"
If ICU wards the world over was being massively overrun like the media portrayed it to be then they wouldnt need to use stock images/videos of anything.
Let me take you back to the good ole social media of doctors/nurses that after these videos was on the news, took there own video footage in their hospitals and in wards showing a very different story before having their posts blocked/removed
Anyways watch what you want, believe what you want.
It will all come out soon enough.
You are aware that they don't just let TV camera crews into ICU wards full of critically sick patients in the middle of a global pandemic!? Not even all hospital staff can just waltz in and out of those areas for the safety of both themselves and the patients. "Maybe then sent in a drone? Maybe they handed a camera to someone who was allowed in? There are simple solutions to these problems especially when that footage might give the public an insight into the dangers. Anyway, want to explain this? Faked? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrfRs0WeShU | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Peres tested positive but was asymptomatic. He could have still passed this on to others who could have developed serious symptoms. You know this very well
WHO have been saying for months that asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare.
Really? And you can provide a source for this?". Oh brilliant. Well obviously the WHO apparently. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Peres tested positive but was asymptomatic. He could have still passed this on to others who could have developed serious symptoms. You know this very well
WHO have been saying for months that asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare.
Really? And you can provide a source for this?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8401121/Spread-coronavirus-people-no-symptoms-appears-RARE-official-says.html
Any other source apart from the daily fail?
Appears rare = extremely rare? You’d need a proper source.". Is that because you don’t want to believe it ? Could ruin so many peoples lame excuse for lazing around. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no.
If the news is reporting on an incident then i expect its footage to be truth and not a "stock image/footage"
If ICU wards the world over was being massively overrun like the media portrayed it to be then they wouldnt need to use stock images/videos of anything.
Let me take you back to the good ole social media of doctors/nurses that after these videos was on the news, took there own video footage in their hospitals and in wards showing a very different story before having their posts blocked/removed
Anyways watch what you want, believe what you want.
It will all come out soon enough.
You are aware that they don't just let TV camera crews into ICU wards full of critically sick patients in the middle of a global pandemic!? Not even all hospital staff can just waltz in and out of those areas for the safety of both themselves and the patients.
Maybe then sent in a drone? Maybe they handed a camera to someone who was allowed in? There are simple solutions to these problems especially when that footage might give the public an insight into the dangers.
Anyway, want to explain this? Faked?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrfRs0WeShU
"Are you seriously suggesting people have been flying drones into an ICU unit and no one noticed!? Even the tiniest ones are plenty loud enough to hear from the other side of a room. No, I have no interest in trying to pull apart YouTube videos where there is absolutely no way of verifying any of the circumstances in which it was shot. Neither you nor I can say if it's fake or not. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no. "Sorry to burst your weird little bubble, but yes. There is absolutely no need or sense to get fresh footage every time something is mentioned. It would be dangerous, long winded and inconvenient for thise on either side of the camera. If you can't understand or accept that then that's your problem, not everyone elses. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Are you seriously suggesting people have been flying drones into an ICU unit and no one noticed!? Even the tiniest ones are plenty loud enough to hear from the other side of a room. " Must have done if it's on that well known site of all things sane and rational...  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no.
Sorry to burst your weird little bubble, but yes.
There is absolutely no need or sense to get fresh footage every time something is mentioned.
It would be dangerous, long winded and inconvenient for thise on either side of the camera.
If you can't understand or accept that then that's your problem, not everyone elses."Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months. The world you are living in is not the world you think it is. Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it. I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months. The world you are living in is not the world you think it is. Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it. I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you." Ooooh spooky shit doesn't scare or impress me pal. The Matrix was just a film, get over it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no.
Sorry to burst your weird little bubble, but yes.
There is absolutely no need or sense to get fresh footage every time something is mentioned.
It would be dangerous, long winded and inconvenient for thise on either side of the camera.
If you can't understand or accept that then that's your problem, not everyone elses.
Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months.
The world you are living in is not the world you think it is.
Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it.
I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you."No, it isn't, what's going to happen, is your going to spend a very long time waiting for your conspiracies to come true. But don't worry, it'll always be just around the next corner and behind the next whistle blower "they" can't silence. Pretty please FAB, can we have a face palm emoji!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months. The world you are living in is not the world you think it is. Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it. I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you. Ooooh spooky shit doesn't scare or impress me pal. The Matrix was just a film, get over it. " Go start with a documentary called "out of shadows". You might learn somthing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no.
Sorry to burst your weird little bubble, but yes.
There is absolutely no need or sense to get fresh footage every time something is mentioned.
It would be dangerous, long winded and inconvenient for thise on either side of the camera.
If you can't understand or accept that then that's your problem, not everyone elses.
Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months.
The world you are living in is not the world you think it is.
Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it.
I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you."Research? Yeah right | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no.
Sorry to burst your weird little bubble, but yes.
There is absolutely no need or sense to get fresh footage every time something is mentioned.
It would be dangerous, long winded and inconvenient for thise on either side of the camera.
If you can't understand or accept that then that's your problem, not everyone elses.
Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months.
The world you are living in is not the world you think it is.
Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it.
I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you.
Research? Yeah right"Yeah its called sitting at a computer (or phone) and looking into things that arnt shown on main stream media. Seriously if you want to see how brainwashing and programming the main stream media is, go and take 1 hour and 15 mins out of your life and go watch out of shadows. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no.
Sorry to burst your weird little bubble, but yes.
There is absolutely no need or sense to get fresh footage every time something is mentioned.
It would be dangerous, long winded and inconvenient for thise on either side of the camera.
If you can't understand or accept that then that's your problem, not everyone elses.
Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months.
The world you are living in is not the world you think it is.
Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it.
I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you.
Research? Yeah right
Yeah its called sitting at a computer (or phone) and looking into things that arnt shown on main stream media.
Seriously if you want to see how brainwashing and programming the main stream media is, go and take 1 hour and 15 mins out of your life and go watch out of shadows."Please just stop it will you, you've posted all this junk before, no one is interested. It's rubbish, if you want to revel in the "hidden truth" there are plenty of other sites out there where you will find people hungry to listen to what the media elite are hiding from them. Personally, I'll stick with reality. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months. The world you are living in is not the world you think it is. Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it. I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you. Ooooh spooky shit doesn't scare or impress me pal. The Matrix was just a film, get over it. Go start with a documentary called "out of shadows". You might learn somthing. " No thanks. Every time someone watches shit like that, it adds another '_iew' to the count and leads to the lie that people agree with it, which in turn just attracts more people who have zero common sense. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no.
Sorry to burst your weird little bubble, but yes.
There is absolutely no need or sense to get fresh footage every time something is mentioned.
It would be dangerous, long winded and inconvenient for thise on either side of the camera.
If you can't understand or accept that then that's your problem, not everyone elses.
Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months.
The world you are living in is not the world you think it is.
Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it.
I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you.
Research? Yeah right
Yeah its called sitting at a computer (or phone) and looking into things that arnt shown on main stream media.
Seriously if you want to see how brainwashing and programming the main stream media is, go and take 1 hour and 15 mins out of your life and go watch out of shadows.
Please just stop it will you, you've posted all this junk before, no one is interested. It's rubbish, if you want to revel in the "hidden truth" there are plenty of other sites out there where you will find people hungry to listen to what the media elite are hiding from them. Personally, I'll stick with reality. "Until you have gone and watched the documentary out of shadows how can we even possibly debate this? One of us is informed by somthing other than main steam media and the other is not. So please go watch that documentary and i will calmly and politely debate with you on here or by inbox for as long as you want. Until then there is no point really is there. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months. The world you are living in is not the world you think it is. Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it. I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you. Ooooh spooky shit doesn't scare or impress me pal. The Matrix was just a film, get over it. Go start with a documentary called "out of shadows". You might learn somthing. No thanks. Every time someone watches shit like that, it adds another '_iew' to the count and leads to the lie that people agree with it, which in turn just attracts more people who have zero common sense. " Ahhh ignorance is bliss isnt it. See you wont even try will you. You are probably scared that your cognitive dissonance will shatter into a million pieces. You should at least go watch it so you can debate with me properly on here. But saying your not willing to even go watch somthing says it all really. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no.
Sorry to burst your weird little bubble, but yes.
There is absolutely no need or sense to get fresh footage every time something is mentioned.
It would be dangerous, long winded and inconvenient for thise on either side of the camera.
If you can't understand or accept that then that's your problem, not everyone elses.
Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months.
The world you are living in is not the world you think it is.
Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it.
I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you.
Research? Yeah right
Yeah its called sitting at a computer (or phone) and looking into things that arnt shown on main stream media.
Seriously if you want to see how brainwashing and programming the main stream media is, go and take 1 hour and 15 mins out of your life and go watch out of shadows.
Please just stop it will you, you've posted all this junk before, no one is interested. It's rubbish, if you want to revel in the "hidden truth" there are plenty of other sites out there where you will find people hungry to listen to what the media elite are hiding from them. Personally, I'll stick with reality.
Until you have gone and watched the documentary out of shadows how can we even possibly debate this?
One of us is informed by somthing other than main steam media and the other is not.
So please go watch that documentary and i will calmly and politely debate with you on here or by inbox for as long as you want.
Until then there is no point really is there."You are working under the premise that I want to debate conspiracy theory, I don't, it's junk and only leads to mis information and/or harm. I've spent far too long in my life seeing and dealing with the effects latest conspiracy nonsense, usually it's a subtly adapted version of the last load of rubbish. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months. The world you are living in is not the world you think it is. Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it. I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you. Ooooh spooky shit doesn't scare or impress me pal. The Matrix was just a film, get over it. Go start with a documentary called "out of shadows". You might learn somthing. No thanks. Every time someone watches shit like that, it adds another '_iew' to the count and leads to the lie that people agree with it, which in turn just attracts more people who have zero common sense. " Also when you say "shit like that" do you even know what its about? You probably don't even have one iota of what the documentary entails so until you've watched it please do me the pleasure of stfu. When you have we can then both debate it on a even keel. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no.
Sorry to burst your weird little bubble, but yes.
There is absolutely no need or sense to get fresh footage every time something is mentioned.
It would be dangerous, long winded and inconvenient for thise on either side of the camera.
If you can't understand or accept that then that's your problem, not everyone elses.
Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months.
The world you are living in is not the world you think it is.
Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it.
I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you.
Research? Yeah right
Yeah its called sitting at a computer (or phone) and looking into things that arnt shown on main stream media.
Seriously if you want to see how brainwashing and programming the main stream media is, go and take 1 hour and 15 mins out of your life and go watch out of shadows.
Please just stop it will you, you've posted all this junk before, no one is interested. It's rubbish, if you want to revel in the "hidden truth" there are plenty of other sites out there where you will find people hungry to listen to what the media elite are hiding from them. Personally, I'll stick with reality.
Until you have gone and watched the documentary out of shadows how can we even possibly debate this?
One of us is informed by somthing other than main steam media and the other is not.
So please go watch that documentary and i will calmly and politely debate with you on here or by inbox for as long as you want.
Until then there is no point really is there.
You are working under the premise that I want to debate conspiracy theory, I don't, it's junk and only leads to mis information and/or harm. I've spent far too long in my life seeing and dealing with the effects latest conspiracy nonsense, usually it's a subtly adapted version of the last load of rubbish. "Ahh the ole "conspiracy nonsense" theres nothing in the documantary thats condpiracy but seeing as you havnt watched it and have no intention of watching it then you too can kindly stfu also | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Ahhh ignorance is bliss isnt it. See you wont even try will you. You are probably scared that your cognitive dissonance will shatter into a million pieces. You should at least go watch it so you can debate with me properly on here. But saying your not willing to even go watch somthing says it all really." Yes it does say it all. You and your kind have been around for centuries, prophesising the end of the world and such shit - and you have all died waiting for it to happen. You're not 'original thinkers' or highly intelligent - you're just shadow feeders built on a dull, repetitious and standardised template. What's the saddest - skulking around in the shadows muttering about the 'world order', or living a life in the sunshine? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months. The world you are living in is not the world you think it is. Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it. I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you. Ooooh spooky shit doesn't scare or impress me pal. The Matrix was just a film, get over it. Go start with a documentary called "out of shadows". You might learn somthing. No thanks. Every time someone watches shit like that, it adds another '_iew' to the count and leads to the lie that people agree with it, which in turn just attracts more people who have zero common sense. Also when you say "shit like that" do you even know what its about? You probably don't even have one iota of what the documentary entails so until you've watched it please do me the pleasure of stfu. When you have we can then both debate it on a even keel." We will never debate on an even keel, I live in the real world with real people. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months. The world you are living in is not the world you think it is. Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it. I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you. Ooooh spooky shit doesn't scare or impress me pal. The Matrix was just a film, get over it. Go start with a documentary called "out of shadows". You might learn somthing. No thanks. Every time someone watches shit like that, it adds another '_iew' to the count and leads to the lie that people agree with it, which in turn just attracts more people who have zero common sense. Also when you say "shit like that" do you even know what its about? You probably don't even have one iota of what the documentary entails so until you've watched it please do me the pleasure of stfu. When you have we can then both debate it on a even keel. We will never debate on an even keel, I live in the real world with real people." Sighs. Yeah keep on telling yourself that my friend. If anyone is reading this that has seen the documentary what did you think of it or if you havnt seen it but after reading this conversation decide to id love to hear your thoughts on it so we can share our opinions as the guy above is a lost cause. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months. The world you are living in is not the world you think it is. Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it. I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you. Ooooh spooky shit doesn't scare or impress me pal. The Matrix was just a film, get over it. Go start with a documentary called "out of shadows". You might learn somthing. No thanks. Every time someone watches shit like that, it adds another '_iew' to the count and leads to the lie that people agree with it, which in turn just attracts more people who have zero common sense. Also when you say "shit like that" do you even know what its about? You probably don't even have one iota of what the documentary entails so until you've watched it please do me the pleasure of stfu. When you have we can then both debate it on a even keel. We will never debate on an even keel, I live in the real world with real people. Sighs. Yeah keep on telling yourself that my friend. If anyone is reading this that has seen the documentary what did you think of it or if you havnt seen it but after reading this conversation decide to id love to hear your thoughts on it so we can share our opinions as the guy above is a lost cause. " Share opinions? I and a number of other users shared our opinions about this the last time you posted it and had the post removed I seem to recall. It's nonsense, and claiming "cognitive dissonance" all the time doesn't make it any more true. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Your whole reality you think you are living in is going to be blown wide open within the next 12 months. The world you are living in is not the world you think it is. Your cognitive dissonance won't know whats hit it. I'd start researching into things now so its a bit less of a blow for you. Ooooh spooky shit doesn't scare or impress me pal. The Matrix was just a film, get over it. Go start with a documentary called "out of shadows". You might learn somthing. No thanks. Every time someone watches shit like that, it adds another '_iew' to the count and leads to the lie that people agree with it, which in turn just attracts more people who have zero common sense. Ahhh ignorance is bliss isnt it. See you wont even try will you. You are probably scared that your cognitive dissonance will shatter into a million pieces. You should at least go watch it so you can debate with me properly on here. But saying your not willing to even go watch somthing says it all really." Copypasta but still relevant to this enlightened smoothbrain nonsense: "Please stop saying you "researched it '. You didn't research anything and its highly probable that you dont even know how to do so. Did you compile a literature re_iew and write abstracts on each article? Or better yet, did you collect a random sample of sources and perform independent probability statistics on the reported results? No? Did you at least take each article, one by one and look into the source ( that would be the author, publisher and funder), then critique the writing for logical fallacies, cognitive distortions and plain inaccuracies. Did you ask yourself why this source might publish these particular results? Did you follow the trail of references and apply the same source of scrutiny to them? No? Then you didn't fucking research anything. You read or watched a video, most likely with little to no objectivity. You came across something in your algorithm manipulated feed, something that lived with your implicit biases and served your confirmation bias, and subconsciously applied your emotional filters and called it proof. Scary." ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Share opinions? I and a number of other users shared our opinions about this the last time you posted it and had the post removed I seem to recall. It's nonsense, and claiming "cognitive dissonance" all the time doesn't make it any more true. " The ironic thing is that nearly everyone who goes on about 'cognitive dissonance' all the time are clearly the ones out of step with everyone else. I think that every time someone eats a jelly baby, an angel dies - therefore it's perfectly reasonable for me to stop everyone eating jelly babies...  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Peres tested positive but was asymptomatic. He could have still passed this on to others who could have developed serious symptoms. You know this very well
WHO have been saying for months that asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare.
Really? And you can provide a source for this?. Oh brilliant. Well obviously the WHO apparently. "Anyone can say that WHO said whatever they want. I asked for a link to the source of the claim. Simple. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Peres tested positive but was asymptomatic. He could have still passed this on to others who could have developed serious symptoms. You know this very well
WHO have been saying for months that asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare.
Really? And you can provide a source for this?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8401121/Spread-coronavirus-people-no-symptoms-appears-RARE-official-says.html
Any other source apart from the daily fail?
Appears rare = extremely rare? You’d need a proper source.. Is that because you don’t want to believe it ? Could ruin so many peoples lame excuse for lazing around. "WHO backtracked. The guy who published the research stated that WHO had caused confusion because the research did not state transmission was very rare in asymptomatic case. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In the height of this covid stuff bbc had a video clip of an ICU ward in one of the hospitals in london. A day later sky news had the exact same video clip but saying an ICU ward in new york. A week later CNN (think it was them or may be fox) had the exact same video footage but now its an ICU ward in italy. You can't do BS like that and expect people to just trust and follow along. Well obviously it works on the masses i guess but thankfully not everybody. Oh please.
It's just stock footage of an ICU, the same way that they use stock pictures of Winston Churchill or Mick Jagger.
That's just sensible expedience, not evidence of a conspiracy.
Sorry but no just no.
If the news is reporting on an incident then i expect its footage to be truth and not a "stock image/footage"
If ICU wards the world over was being massively overrun like the media portrayed it to be then they wouldnt need to use stock images/videos of anything.
Let me take you back to the good ole social media of doctors/nurses that after these videos was on the news, took there own video footage in their hospitals and in wards showing a very different story before having their posts blocked/removed
Anyways watch what you want, believe what you want.
It will all come out soon enough.
You are aware that they don't just let TV camera crews into ICU wards full of critically sick patients in the middle of a global pandemic!? Not even all hospital staff can just waltz in and out of those areas for the safety of both themselves and the patients.
Maybe then sent in a drone? Maybe they handed a camera to someone who was allowed in? There are simple solutions to these problems especially when that footage might give the public an insight into the dangers.
Anyway, want to explain this? Faked?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrfRs0WeShU
Are you seriously suggesting people have been flying drones into an ICU unit and no one noticed!? Even the tiniest ones are plenty loud enough to hear from the other side of a room.
No, I have no interest in trying to pull apart YouTube videos where there is absolutely no way of verifying any of the circumstances in which it was shot. Neither you nor I can say if it's fake or not."I was pointing out that there are ways of getting cameras into ICU that dont require a camera crew. I certainly wasn't suggesting that drones were used to sneak unnoticed! Jeez, learn to read! The youtube video was showing a ward with seriously I'll people and the medical staff inter_iewed referring to covid. My sister was on a covid ward. I guess she was in on this mass conning of the public.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
