FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Virus

Maybe more people - a lot more people Covid-19 than . . .

Jump to newest
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

. . . we think . . .

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/coronavirus-study-suggests-more-people-142439602.html

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There's definitely many more people who have had it than test figures show. Asymptomatic people, those who had symptoms before mass testing was available.

The Navy ship and cruise ship a few months ago where every person was tested. X amount tested positive but not all had symptoms.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eddy and legsCouple
over a year ago

the wetlands

Probably best to read the official results of the government study than some random ramblings from a questionable source

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Today in the Guardian:

40% of people in an Austrian ski resort had antibodies, meaning they had all had the disease

Of this 40%, 85% of them didn't notice any symptoms.

And experts in USA now seem to think that 20 million American people have had it, as opposed to the 2 million+ cases reported there.

All of which means that the disease is far more widespread than we think.

And by extrapolation, far less deadly than the numbers of deaths would lead us to think.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Today in the Guardian:

40% of people in an Austrian ski resort had antibodies, meaning they had all had the disease

Of this 40%, 85% of them didn't notice any symptoms.

And experts in USA now seem to think that 20 million American people have had it, as opposed to the 2 million+ cases reported there.

All of which means that the disease is far more widespread than we think.

And by extrapolation, far less deadly than the numbers of deaths would lead us to think."

'Experts in the USA'. I wonder if that's Trump and Karen.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke


"Probably best to read the official results of the government study than some random ramblings from a questionable source"

Magda Osman, Reader in Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, Norman Fenton, Professor of Risk and Information Management, Queen Mary University of London, Scott McLachlan, Postdoctoral Researcher in Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, and Martin Neil, Professor in Computer Science and Statistics, Queen Mary University of London

Headed by Imperial College London who are Avising the Government . . .

Yea dead dodgy . . .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The Guardian is a responsible newspaper

And if you bother to look up the articles you will see that the sources are genuine and not “ramblings “

Our government is not giving us the full facts on this. They only trot out the experts they want us to believe and only release the figures that back up their arguments

Boris is not known as an out and out liar for nothing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"than some random ramblings from a questionable source"

That totally rules out listening to the government then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *atEvolution OP   Couple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke


"than some random ramblings from a questionable source

That totally rules out listening to the government then "

lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top