FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Virus

Djokovich

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Organises a no social distancing tournament....catches Covid.

No shit Sherlock!

That bit him in the arse good style!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oldswarriorMan
over a year ago

Falkirk

Yea just seen that.

I'm sure he will make a quick recovery.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Apparently he is an anti-vaccination bone head too!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ljamMan
over a year ago

Edinburgh

Not sure if this is closer to comedy or tragedy. Definitely stupidity.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oldswarriorMan
over a year ago

Falkirk


"Not sure if this is closer to comedy or tragedy. Definitely stupidity. "

Yea I'm going with dark comedy lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

At least he's not the leader of a powerful country

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

Sometimes things just go around . . . and he was really using the power he has as a celebrity to get people to get infected. What a *&%$

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

No different to those covidiots protesting

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ljamMan
over a year ago

Edinburgh


"No different to those covidiots protesting "

Bit different

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *DGF20Man
over a year ago

Dublin

Really not sure what's behind that story, it's in Croatia so everything is possible...i am just sad about tourism in Croatia this summer because it's almost main income for Croatian economy and they did great job about Covid-19 but they fuck all now i think

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *yn drwgMan
over a year ago

Camarthen

Dont think he's going to be suffering to much, his fitness levels are off the scale compared to some who have passed away.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *DGF20Man
over a year ago

Dublin

Same like 90% of people, this is far away from deadly virus, just marketing name for "scary" virus...many nonsense things about this madness...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"No different to those covidiots protesting

Bit different"

Oh I forgot.. those Morons protesting have invisible Covid shields..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ljamMan
over a year ago

Edinburgh


"No different to those covidiots protesting

Bit different

Oh I forgot.. those Morons protesting have invisible Covid shields..

"

I see

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral

Now he and his tennis pals have the virus maybe it will make others take heed how stupid it is not social distance

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Novak is one of my sporting heroes..

I hope he, his family and relatives are ok..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arkb73Man
over a year ago

Cheshire/Staffs


"No different to those covidiots protesting

Bit different"

Very much different

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"No different to those covidiots protesting

Bit different

Very much different "

Not you again...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"No different to those covidiots protesting

Bit different"

No.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

Oh dear what a wally. Here’s hoping for a speedy recovery.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arkb73Man
over a year ago

Cheshire/Staffs


"No different to those covidiots protesting

Bit different

Very much different

Not you again..."

Still kicking off arguments and pretending to be the one who is hurt?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford


"Organises a no social distancing tournament....catches Covid.

No shit Sherlock!

That bit him in the arse good style!"

Advantage Covid.....will Djokovic recover?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

He is strong as an ox and hope he will be ok

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo


"No different to those covidiots protesting

Bit different

Very much different

Not you again...

Still kicking off arguments and pretending to be the one who is hurt? "

Ignore each other please

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arkb73Man
over a year ago

Cheshire/Staffs


"No different to those covidiots protesting

Bit different

Very much different

Not you again...

Still kicking off arguments and pretending to be the one who is hurt?

Ignore each other please"

Delighted to do so

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Don't really care to be fair ha.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *adyinred696969Couple
over a year ago

Brecon

Is he the one that is an anti-vaxxer, bit ironic isn't it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch


"Is he the one that is an anti-vaxxer, bit ironic isn't it? "

Is it ?

So he has caught it not died and is now possibly immune

I suggest caution at ridicule

Imagine if immunity to the virus give some greater freedoms

Imagine he can now safely genuinely hug his mum

I suggest caution with holier than thou finger wagging

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ylonSlutTV/TS
over a year ago

Durham


"Is he the one that is an anti-vaxxer, bit ironic isn't it?

Is it ?

So he has caught it not died and is now possibly immune

I suggest caution at ridicule

Imagine if immunity to the virus give some greater freedoms

Imagine he can now safely genuinely hug his mum

I suggest caution with holier than thou finger wagging

"

No one knows if or for how long catching the virus makes you immmune. He may get sick yet. He has admitted he was stupid.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Kinda surprised me. Didn't think a cyborg would be susceptible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxy_minxWoman
over a year ago

Scotland - Aberdeen

It wasn't just tennis he was playing though!

Him and friends were partying in some sort of night club, with no social distancing at all, says it all really Not that I know the rules that Croatia has set themselves of course.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch


"Is he the one that is an anti-vaxxer, bit ironic isn't it?

Is it ?

So he has caught it not died and is now possibly immune

I suggest caution at ridicule

Imagine if immunity to the virus give some greater freedoms

Imagine he can now safely genuinely hug his mum

I suggest caution with holier than thou finger wagging

No one knows if or for how long catching the virus makes you immmune. He may get sick yet. He has admitted he was stupid."

As you say no one , no one , absolutely no one knows

Holding A position either way is based upon stuff no one knows

I did not say I condone his actions I suggested caution in condemning them vehemently that there are other quite valid perspectives

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"Is he the one that is an anti-vaxxer, bit ironic isn't it?

Is it ?

So he has caught it not died and is now possibly immune

I suggest caution at ridicule

Imagine if immunity to the virus give some greater freedoms

Imagine he can now safely genuinely hug his mum

I suggest caution with holier than thou finger wagging

No one knows if or for how long catching the virus makes you immmune. He may get sick yet. He has admitted he was stupid.

As you say no one , no one , absolutely no one knows

Holding A position either way is based upon stuff no one knows

I did not say I condone his actions I suggested caution in condemning them vehemently that there are other quite valid perspectives

"

there is actually a suggestion coming out of a study in china (so take it for what its worth) that the milder your experience with Covid is.... the shorter time the antibodies you have last

if you have me agree with Nick Kyrgios, who called all the tennis players "boneheads" and he is suppose to be the mental aussie, then we know 2020 is a weird place....

actually the irony in the anti vaxxer getting it... then possibly getting it again because of his anti vaxxer beliefs is just setting off all my irony alarms at chez _abio!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"Is he the one that is an anti-vaxxer, bit ironic isn't it?

Is it ?

So he has caught it not died and is now possibly immune

I suggest caution at ridicule

Imagine if immunity to the virus give some greater freedoms

Imagine he can now safely genuinely hug his mum

I suggest caution with holier than thou finger wagging

"

With you there brother. I'm still pretty new to these forums but there seem to be industrial quantities of schadenfreude in most threads.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urocougarCouple
over a year ago

watton


"Is he the one that is an anti-vaxxer, bit ironic isn't it?

Is it ?

So he has caught it not died and is now possibly immune

I suggest caution at ridicule

Imagine if immunity to the virus give some greater freedoms

Imagine he can now safely genuinely hug his mum

I suggest caution with holier than thou finger wagging

"

What about all the people he gave it to that may not be as strong as an ox like him

Food for thought or is he just is a selfish cunt really

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch

[Removed by poster at 24/06/20 21:50:41]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch


"Is he the one that is an anti-vaxxer, bit ironic isn't it?

Is it ?

So he has caught it not died and is now possibly immune

I suggest caution at ridicule

Imagine if immunity to the virus give some greater freedoms

Imagine he can now safely genuinely hug his mum

I suggest caution with holier than thou finger wagging

What about all the people he gave it to that may not be as strong as an ox like him

Food for thought or is he just is a selfish cunt really "

Have you ever wondered how many deaths you are directly responsible for in the past for not a, avoiding a virus and b, then continuing with your life

Food for thought x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ickDastardlyMan
over a year ago

North East

Big tennis fan here.

He organised the tournament with a few others and it say it was wildly irresponsible would be an understatement.

Especially considering sport, in general, is on shaky ground getting back on its feet. This could be a calamity for the ATP and WTA.

The lack of social distancing and the massive post tournament players party were head in hand moments.

Djokovic has had several missteps culminating in this over the last several months and would do well taking a step back.

Not a good look for the sport at all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch

As for anti vaccine

This from the BBC

Many traditional vaccines are based on a weakened or modified form of virus, or parts of it, but the Imperial vaccine is based on a new approach, using synthetic strands of genetic code, called RNA, which mimic the virus.

Once injected into muscle, the RNA self-amplifies - generating copies of itself - and instructs the body's own cells to make copies of a spike protein found on the outside of the virus.

This should train the immune system to recognise and fight coronavirus without having to develop Covid-19.

New approach

Not tried tested understood

New approach

Modified RNA. They have made a new virus in other words and are injecting it

Now I wish them well but the traditional arguments pro vaccine do not exactly hold true

With a man made virus made and injected into humans within 4 months of development

I'm an advocate of vaccine but personally I'd rather catch cov and isolate responsibly than have this RNA injected this year or two ???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

He is Serbian. They are very strong willed people and have a history of upsetting the rest of the world. He is obviously not very different.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No different to those covidiots protesting "

Agree but others won't, because they have two sets of rules, one for those they like and one for those they don't lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch


"He is Serbian. They are very strong willed people and have a history of upsetting the rest of the world. He is obviously not very different.

"

Is that not also

A trait shared by SOME

English,Welsh,Scottish, Irish, French, Italian, Russian , infact some humans generally

???

The average fab response to the question

" do you care what others think "

Is usually

" I could not give a flying fuck what others think"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He is Serbian. They are very strong willed people and have a history of upsetting the rest of the world. He is obviously not very different.

"

He is Serbian therefore........ He is from Jamaica therefore...... He is from ........ Hmmmmm

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

He has apologised and I think genuine remorse..

Reckless Tobe so close to others..

No apologies from the beach morons or protester covidiots though....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *69BANMan
over a year ago

Reading


"As for anti vaccine

This from the BBC

Many traditional vaccines are based on a weakened or modified form of virus, or parts of it, but the Imperial vaccine is based on a new approach, using synthetic strands of genetic code, called RNA, which mimic the virus.

Once injected into muscle, the RNA self-amplifies - generating copies of itself - and instructs the body's own cells to make copies of a spike protein found on the outside of the virus.

This should train the immune system to recognise and fight coronavirus without having to develop Covid-19.

New approach

Not tried tested understood

New approach

Modified RNA. They have made a new virus in other words and are injecting it

Now I wish them well but the traditional arguments pro vaccine do not exactly hold true

With a man made virus made and injected into humans within 4 months of development

I'm an advocate of vaccine but personally I'd rather catch cov and isolate responsibly than have this RNA injected this year or two ???

"

None of what you said shows you understand what was reported

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As for anti vaccine

This from the BBC

Many traditional vaccines are based on a weakened or modified form of virus, or parts of it, but the Imperial vaccine is based on a new approach, using synthetic strands of genetic code, called RNA, which mimic the virus.

Once injected into muscle, the RNA self-amplifies - generating copies of itself - and instructs the body's own cells to make copies of a spike protein found on the outside of the virus.

This should train the immune system to recognise and fight coronavirus without having to develop Covid-19.

New approach

Not tried tested understood

New approach

Modified RNA. They have made a new virus in other words and are injecting it

Now I wish them well but the traditional arguments pro vaccine do not exactly hold true

With a man made virus made and injected into humans within 4 months of development

I'm an advocate of vaccine but personally I'd rather catch cov and isolate responsibly than have this RNA injected this year or two ???

"

Couldnt agree more

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch


"As for anti vaccine

This from the BBC

Many traditional vaccines are based on a weakened or modified form of virus, or parts of it, but the Imperial vaccine is based on a new approach, using synthetic strands of genetic code, called RNA, which mimic the virus.

Once injected into muscle, the RNA self-amplifies - generating copies of itself - and instructs the body's own cells to make copies of a spike protein found on the outside of the virus.

This should train the immune system to recognise and fight coronavirus without having to develop Covid-19.

New approach

Not tried tested understood

New approach

Modified RNA. They have made a new virus in other words and are injecting it

Now I wish them well but the traditional arguments pro vaccine do not exactly hold true

With a man made virus made and injected into humans within 4 months of development

I'm an advocate of vaccine but personally I'd rather catch cov and isolate responsibly than have this RNA injected this year or two ???

None of what you said shows you understand what was reported "

Ok thank you could you articulate what part I have mis understood

Dont think I mis understood that it was a new approach?

Dont think I mis understood that the RNA they have built did not exist before cov sars2

Dont think I mis understood that RNA that (self amplifies) ie uses human cells to replicate is a virus

I'm perfectly aware they have been experimenting with virus administered genes and other techniques for a while

Experimenting. Learning

I understand scientific method for understanding

Does not mean everything human scientists produce are robust

The anti anti vaccers have a valid point that past vaccines have been illustrated to be tatistically safe and robust

This does not have the safety credentials yet

Now regardless of whether you know more or are indeed correct about my understanding your argument of

"Your wrong cos I say you are"

Has not yet convinced me

I'm perfectly open to being given reasoning that illustrates why I mis understood the meaning of new untested human developed viral vaccine ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unburyguy71Man
over a year ago

Sunbury

For him personally it would be more about what the long term effects of the virus will have on his lungs. As a top tennis player he needs his fitness to be super fit. This may affect him long term. We can only hope not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Is he the one that is an anti-vaxxer, bit ironic isn't it?

Is it ?

So he has caught it not died and is now possibly immune

I suggest caution at ridicule

Imagine if immunity to the virus give some greater freedoms

Imagine he can now safely genuinely hug his mum

I suggest caution with holier than thou finger wagging

With you there brother. I'm still pretty new to these forums but there seem to be industrial quantities of schadenfreude in most threads. "

Doubt he can freely hug his mum. While he might not get infected again himself (as yet unproven) he may well still potentially be a vector. His skin and clothing could act as surfaces to collect and transfer viable viruses.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *69BANMan
over a year ago

Reading


"As for anti vaccine

This from the BBC

Many traditional vaccines are based on a weakened or modified form of virus, or parts of it, but the Imperial vaccine is based on a new approach, using synthetic strands of genetic code, called RNA, which mimic the virus.

Once injected into muscle, the RNA self-amplifies - generating copies of itself - and instructs the body's own cells to make copies of a spike protein found on the outside of the virus.

This should train the immune system to recognise and fight coronavirus without having to develop Covid-19.

New approach

Not tried tested understood

New approach

Modified RNA. They have made a new virus in other words and are injecting it

Now I wish them well but the traditional arguments pro vaccine do not exactly hold true

With a man made virus made and injected into humans within 4 months of development

I'm an advocate of vaccine but personally I'd rather catch cov and isolate responsibly than have this RNA injected this year or two ???

None of what you said shows you understand what was reported

Ok thank you could you articulate what part I have mis understood

Dont think I mis understood that it was a new approach?

Dont think I mis understood that the RNA they have built did not exist before cov sars2

Dont think I mis understood that RNA that (self amplifies) ie uses human cells to replicate is a virus

I'm perfectly aware they have been experimenting with virus administered genes and other techniques for a while

Experimenting. Learning

I understand scientific method for understanding

Does not mean everything human scientists produce are robust

The anti anti vaccers have a valid point that past vaccines have been illustrated to be tatistically safe and robust

This does not have the safety credentials yet

Now regardless of whether you know more or are indeed correct about my understanding your argument of

"Your wrong cos I say you are"

Has not yet convinced me

I'm perfectly open to being given reasoning that illustrates why I mis understood the meaning of new untested human developed viral vaccine ? "

It's actually really difficult to understand what you're trying to articulate, maybe English isn't your first language? But I'll attempt to address your points.

- a mRNA vaccine does not code for a virus, it codes for the S-protein in this case (which all current vaccine candidates are targeting). So you end up with an antigen protein against which the body can mount an immune response.

- they have not made a new virus, they have identified from SARS-2 genome what codes for the specific antigen and are using this that's all. You copied this yourself from the BBC yet came to the conclusion it meant an actual virus!

- they have the potential of being safer as you're not having to deal with attenuated or even live virus vaccines

- of course there are 'no safety credentials', it's early days and why clinical trials are being performed to the highest standards of GCP and declaration of Helsinki, etc.

- if this treatment isn't robust enough or demonstrate its primary objective in the trials it will likely not make it any further without revision, at which point it'll start at the beginning again.

- Unless you've signed up for the trial, you will not be injected within 4 months of development. It is at phase 1 at the moment, we need to get to phase 3 at least before we know if it's a viable option

- to prefer to catch a potentially life threatening virus over a vaccine that will be thoroughly tested is just a big wow!

- the approach is maybe 20 years old, it's just that we haven't had the technology or know how to keep mRNA stable enough for vaccines, and we still may not dependent on the results of the studies

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch


"As for anti vaccine

This from the BBC

Many traditional vaccines are based on a weakened or modified form of virus, or parts of it, but the Imperial vaccine is based on a new approach, using synthetic strands of genetic code, called RNA, which mimic the virus.

Once injected into muscle, the RNA self-amplifies - generating copies of itself - and instructs the body's own cells to make copies of a spike protein found on the outside of the virus.

This should train the immune system to recognise and fight coronavirus without having to develop Covid-19.

New approach

Not tried tested understood

New approach

Modified RNA. They have made a new virus in other words and are injecting it

Now I wish them well but the traditional arguments pro vaccine do not exactly hold true

With a man made virus made and injected into humans within 4 months of development

I'm an advocate of vaccine but personally I'd rather catch cov and isolate responsibly than have this RNA injected this year or two ???

None of what you said shows you understand what was reported

Ok thank you could you articulate what part I have mis understood

Dont think I mis understood that it was a new approach?

Dont think I mis understood that the RNA they have built did not exist before cov sars2

Dont think I mis understood that RNA that (self amplifies) ie uses human cells to replicate is a virus

I'm perfectly aware they have been experimenting with virus administered genes and other techniques for a while

Experimenting. Learning

I understand scientific method for understanding

Does not mean everything human scientists produce are robust

The anti anti vaccers have a valid point that past vaccines have been illustrated to be tatistically safe and robust

This does not have the safety credentials yet

Now regardless of whether you know more or are indeed correct about my understanding your argument of

"Your wrong cos I say you are"

Has not yet convinced me

I'm perfectly open to being given reasoning that illustrates why I mis understood the meaning of new untested human developed viral vaccine ?

It's actually really difficult to understand what you're trying to articulate, maybe English isn't your first language? But I'll attempt to address your points.

- a mRNA vaccine does not code for a virus, it codes for the S-protein in this case (which all current vaccine candidates are targeting). So you end up with an antigen protein against which the body can mount an immune response.

- they have not made a new virus, they have identified from SARS-2 genome what codes for the specific antigen and are using this that's all. You copied this yourself from the BBC yet came to the conclusion it meant an actual virus!

- they have the potential of being safer as you're not having to deal with attenuated or even live virus vaccines

- of course there are 'no safety credentials', it's early days and why clinical trials are being performed to the highest standards of GCP and declaration of Helsinki, etc.

- if this treatment isn't robust enough or demonstrate its primary objective in the trials it will likely not make it any further without revision, at which point it'll start at the beginning again.

- Unless you've signed up for the trial, you will not be injected within 4 months of development. It is at phase 1 at the moment, we need to get to phase 3 at least before we know if it's a viable option

- to prefer to catch a potentially life threatening virus over a vaccine that will be thoroughly tested is just a big wow!

- the approach is maybe 20 years old, it's just that we haven't had the technology or know how to keep mRNA stable enough for vaccines, and we still may not dependent on the results of the studies"

Apart from the side swipe at my language origin that was beautifully articulated thank you

I especially liked the emphasis on "thoroughly tested"

It seems despite your attempt to be condescending we have an accord

I clearly said I'd prefer to take my chances with covid than an "untested" vaccine

I also said I'm an advocate of vaccines

As you clearly perfectly illustrate this is still an experimental approach will the potential to be safer not evidently so

I think the statistics would be in my favour if I were infected

The reality is statistically I most like will be or have been infected before a safe vaccination

But keeping it civil thank you for an insight to how the new approach is hypothetically supposed to work in humans

And regardless of your denial they are using RNA that replicates into a shell

That's still a virus

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford

Deuce, Covid to serve.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As for anti vaccine

This from the BBC

Many traditional vaccines are based on a weakened or modified form of virus, or parts of it, but the Imperial vaccine is based on a new approach, using synthetic strands of genetic code, called RNA, which mimic the virus.

Once injected into muscle, the RNA self-amplifies - generating copies of itself - and instructs the body's own cells to make copies of a spike protein found on the outside of the virus.

This should train the immune system to recognise and fight coronavirus without having to develop Covid-19.

New approach

Not tried tested understood

New approach

Modified RNA. They have made a new virus in other words and are injecting it

Now I wish them well but the traditional arguments pro vaccine do not exactly hold true

With a man made virus made and injected into humans within 4 months of development

I'm an advocate of vaccine but personally I'd rather catch cov and isolate responsibly than have this RNA injected this year or two ???

None of what you said shows you understand what was reported

Ok thank you could you articulate what part I have mis understood

Dont think I mis understood that it was a new approach?

Dont think I mis understood that the RNA they have built did not exist before cov sars2

Dont think I mis understood that RNA that (self amplifies) ie uses human cells to replicate is a virus

I'm perfectly aware they have been experimenting with virus administered genes and other techniques for a while

Experimenting. Learning

I understand scientific method for understanding

Does not mean everything human scientists produce are robust

The anti anti vaccers have a valid point that past vaccines have been illustrated to be tatistically safe and robust

This does not have the safety credentials yet

Now regardless of whether you know more or are indeed correct about my understanding your argument of

"Your wrong cos I say you are"

Has not yet convinced me

I'm perfectly open to being given reasoning that illustrates why I mis understood the meaning of new untested human developed viral vaccine ?

It's actually really difficult to understand what you're trying to articulate, maybe English isn't your first language? But I'll attempt to address your points.

- a mRNA vaccine does not code for a virus, it codes for the S-protein in this case (which all current vaccine candidates are targeting). So you end up with an antigen protein against which the body can mount an immune response.

- they have not made a new virus, they have identified from SARS-2 genome what codes for the specific antigen and are using this that's all. You copied this yourself from the BBC yet came to the conclusion it meant an actual virus!

- they have the potential of being safer as you're not having to deal with attenuated or even live virus vaccines

- of course there are 'no safety credentials', it's early days and why clinical trials are being performed to the highest standards of GCP and declaration of Helsinki, etc.

- if this treatment isn't robust enough or demonstrate its primary objective in the trials it will likely not make it any further without revision, at which point it'll start at the beginning again.

- Unless you've signed up for the trial, you will not be injected within 4 months of development. It is at phase 1 at the moment, we need to get to phase 3 at least before we know if it's a viable option

- to prefer to catch a potentially life threatening virus over a vaccine that will be thoroughly tested is just a big wow!

- the approach is maybe 20 years old, it's just that we haven't had the technology or know how to keep mRNA stable enough for vaccines, and we still may not dependent on the results of the studies

Apart from the side swipe at my language origin that was beautifully articulated thank you

I especially liked the emphasis on "thoroughly tested"

It seems despite your attempt to be condescending we have an accord

I clearly said I'd prefer to take my chances with covid than an "untested" vaccine

I also said I'm an advocate of vaccines

As you clearly perfectly illustrate this is still an experimental approach will the potential to be safer not evidently so

I think the statistics would be in my favour if I were infected

The reality is statistically I most like will be or have been infected before a safe vaccination

But keeping it civil thank you for an insight to how the new approach is hypothetically supposed to work in humans

And regardless of your denial they are using RNA that replicates into a shell

That's still a virus

"

You'd have to be insane to take this fast tracked vaccine.

No one is going to want it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top