Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Virus |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-nhs-trust-apologises-to-family-of-elderly-patient-whose-medical-records-were-altered-11992855 " Bloody hell!, that's terrible, falsifying records like that should lead to an enquiry. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wonder how long before a flag waving tory will reply. "lets keep politics out of this until it's over" is one retort they use. It needs to be nipped in tbe bud before the rot sets in and claims more lives " Deceit in this case is A-Political. It's just plain old lies at the expense of life. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wonder how long before a flag waving tory will reply. "lets keep politics out of this until it's over" is one retort they use. It needs to be nipped in tbe bud before the rot sets in and claims more lives Deceit in this case is A-Political. It's just plain old lies at the expense of life." just hope it isn't dropped and is investigated | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wonder how long before a flag waving tory will reply. "lets keep politics out of this until it's over" is one retort they use. It needs to be nipped in tbe bud before the rot sets in and claims more lives Deceit in this case is A-Political. It's just plain old lies at the expense of life." There has been widespread reports of the government’s handling of carehomes, in this case this fraudulent activity (if proved) favours them | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Something like this happened at the mrs carehome. 3 patients sent to the home to free up beds . The home were told they were covid free. 4 weeks, 21 deaths and 80% of staff at the home tested positive. Including the mrs who then passed it on to me. Well done RVI Newcastle." You two recovered ok? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Something like this happened at the mrs carehome. 3 patients sent to the home to free up beds . The home were told they were covid free. 4 weeks, 21 deaths and 80% of staff at the home tested positive. Including the mrs who then passed it on to me. Well done RVI Newcastle. You two recovered ok? " The mrs has asthma and she flew through it. It took the mr 3 weeks to shake it off. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-nhs-trust-apologises-to-family-of-elderly-patient-whose-medical-records-were-altered-11992855 Bloody hell!, that's terrible, falsifying records like that should lead to an enquiry. " It could have been a genuine mistake but whoever amended the records should have signed their initials and dated it if the date was different to the original entry. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-nhs-trust-apologises-to-family-of-elderly-patient-whose-medical-records-were-altered-11992855 Bloody hell!, that's terrible, falsifying records like that should lead to an enquiry. It could have been a genuine mistake but whoever amended the records should have signed their initials and dated it if the date was different to the original entry. " It is easy to have one patient in mind and recording information in the wrong notes. This is recognised in the digital records as there is a code (reason) for striking out an entry. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-nhs-trust-apologises-to-family-of-elderly-patient-whose-medical-records-were-altered-11992855 Bloody hell!, that's terrible, falsifying records like that should lead to an enquiry. It could have been a genuine mistake but whoever amended the records should have signed their initials and dated it if the date was different to the original entry. It is easy to have one patient in mind and recording information in the wrong notes. This is recognised in the digital records as there is a code (reason) for striking out an entry. " Fair point. Just hope it's investigated | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It is easy to have one patient in mind and recording information in the wrong notes. This is recognised in the digital records as there is a code (reason) for striking out an entry. " Actually no it's not easy at all - They are paid for that not to happen. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It is easy to have one patient in mind and recording information in the wrong notes. This is recognised in the digital records as there is a code (reason) for striking out an entry. Actually no it's not easy at all - They are paid for that not to happen." Actually it is! Human error is permissible, not correcting it isn't! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It is easy to have one patient in mind and recording information in the wrong notes. This is recognised in the digital records as there is a code (reason) for striking out an entry. Actually no it's not easy at all - They are paid for that not to happen. Actually it is! Human error is permissible, not correcting it isn't!" It is easier digitally. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It is easier digitally. " Nope. It's not. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It is easier digitally. Nope. It's not." It's easier to make errors digitally which is why the advice is only to have one patient window open at a time. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It is easy to have one patient in mind and recording information in the wrong notes. This is recognised in the digital records as there is a code (reason) for striking out an entry. Actually no it's not easy at all - They are paid for that not to happen." You have never made an error at work? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In my experience the NHS simply use patient records to their own ends. There is a total lack of openess and honesty. At hospital level the NHS fails me EVERYTIME. My GP practice is excellent." If you are failed by a Trust, then make a complaint, it may benefit other patients. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In my experience the NHS simply use patient records to their own ends. There is a total lack of openess and honesty. At hospital level the NHS fails me EVERYTIME. My GP practice is excellent." Go private then. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually no it's not easy at all - They are paid for that not to happen. You have never made an error at work? " Not one that directly affect the life of someone. No. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyway it wasn't a mistake it was deliberately changed." Evidence? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyway it wasn't a mistake it was deliberately changed. Evidence? " The Hospital admitted it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually no it's not easy at all - They are paid for that not to happen. You have never made an error at work? Not one that directly affect the life of someone. No." An error is an error.... Its great how it's OK for everyone else to be excused but NHS staff must be perfect at all times. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyway it wasn't a mistake it was deliberately changed. Evidence? The Hospital admitted it. " The initial error was changed possibly? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually no it's not easy at all - They are paid for that not to happen. You have never made an error at work? Not one that directly affect the life of someone. No. An error is an error.... Its great how it's OK for everyone else to be excused but NHS staff must be perfect at all times. " Read the article (I did post it for those interested to read) Again it wasn't an error it was deliberately changed. The hospital admitted it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Actually no it's not easy at all - They are paid for that not to happen. You have never made an error at work? Not one that directly affect the life of someone. No. An error is an error.... Its great how it's OK for everyone else to be excused but NHS staff must be perfect at all times. Read the article (I did post it for those interested to read) Again it wasn't an error it was deliberately changed. The hospital admitted it." I did read the article, the error was changed, rectified whatever you wish to call it, the wrongdoing was in not initialising the amendment. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyway it wasn't a mistake it was deliberately changed. Evidence? The Hospital admitted it. " Sorry I perceived your statement meant as in falsifying the document. But your words don't state that. If an error was made and then amended, obviously it's a deliberate/conscious change. And as stated earlier, should have been initialled. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
