FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Virus

Children at school in France

Jump to newest
 

By *evaquit OP   Couple
over a year ago

Catthorpe

Anyone seen the images and footage from todays news of school children sitting in their own square boxes at play time? Quite upsetting and definitely hit home. I do worry just what the damaging psychological impact will be, if any? Won't be long before it's inevitably introduced here.

Thoughts.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hrista BellendWoman
over a year ago

surrounded by twinkly lights

Lots of people who are able to work from home and care for their children won't send them to school till September, we need the vulnerable kids in school now because it's a break from psychological and physical dangers at home and guaranteed hot meals, lots of the vulnerable kids who have places in school now are not attending and that's a serious worry

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ercuryMan
over a year ago

Grantham

There was a good report on the BBC today, about primary schools in Denmark.

They look like they've risen well to the challenges. The children seemed to be more resilient than we could ever imagine.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I thought that was sad the children in their own boxes in the playground

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago

Northampton Somewhere

My good friend is a school teacher with a mixed yr5 and 6 class, she said that she feels that the children will be better off at home because school won't be school for them. She's also considering giving up teaching because of what they have been asked to do with no guidelines as such. This is a woman who has dedicated her life to teaching. It's so sad.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eddy and legsCouple
over a year ago

the wetlands


"There was a good report on the BBC today, about primary schools in Denmark.

They look like they've risen well to the challenges. The children seemed to be more resilient than we could ever imagine. "

That was a great feature, British teachers and parents looking for problems Denmark just getting on with it and smiling all the way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There was a good report on the BBC today, about primary schools in Denmark.

They look like they've risen well to the challenges. The children seemed to be more resilient than we could ever imagine.

That was a great feature, British teachers and parents looking for problems Denmark just getting on with it and smiling all the way.

"

Bloody teachers, moaning about no PPE and not wanting to die....how dare they!! Luckily, stockbrokers have been furloughed till October...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There was a good report on the BBC today, about primary schools in Denmark.

They look like they've risen well to the challenges. The children seemed to be more resilient than we could ever imagine.

That was a great feature, British teachers and parents looking for problems Denmark just getting on with it and smiling all the way.

Couldn't agree more more, bulldog spirit, the Danes have it lol

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The question I heard posed today is why should teachers trust the government regarding schools? Where could teachers look for evidence of the government's competence with dealing with Covid 19?? Ah, maybe the advice they gave to care homes.....ahhh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mokes n MirrorsCouple
over a year ago

Plymouth and Newcastle (sometimes)


"There was a good report on the BBC today, about primary schools in Denmark.

They look like they've risen well to the challenges. The children seemed to be more resilient than we could ever imagine. "

They only showed 6 and 7 year olds though. How do you wrangle the younger ones when they have no sense of personal space?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The question I heard posed today is why should teachers trust the government regarding schools? Where could teachers look for evidence of the government's competence with dealing with Covid 19?? Ah, maybe the advice they gave to care homes.....ahhh"

Where could anyone get advice on covid lol it's a new virus and is causing every nation headaches, but some like the Danes have rolled their sleeves up

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"My good friend is a school teacher with a mixed yr5 and 6 class, she said that she feels that the children will be better off at home because school won't be school for them. She's also considering giving up teaching because of what they have been asked to do with no guidelines as such. This is a woman who has dedicated her life to teaching. It's so sad."

That is very sad. And scary.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There was a good report on the BBC today, about primary schools in Denmark.

They look like they've risen well to the challenges. The children seemed to be more resilient than we could ever imagine.

They only showed 6 and 7 year olds though. How do you wrangle the younger ones when they have no sense of personal space?"

Great profile pic!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The question I heard posed today is why should teachers trust the government regarding schools? Where could teachers look for evidence of the government's competence with dealing with Covid 19?? Ah, maybe the advice they gave to care homes.....ahhh

Where could anyone get advice on covid lol it's a new virus and is causing every nation headaches, but some like the Danes have rolled their sleeves up "

Probably scientists and research. I know that is deeply unfashionable these days. The government doesn't seem to want to publish the science it follows. Maybe they should of 'rolled their sleeves up' in the care homes and it would of been ok....jeez

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"The question I heard posed today is why should teachers trust the government regarding schools? Where could teachers look for evidence of the government's competence with dealing with Covid 19?? Ah, maybe the advice they gave to care homes.....ahhh

Where could anyone get advice on covid lol it's a new virus and is causing every nation headaches, but some like the Danes have rolled their sleeves up

Probably scientists and research. I know that is deeply unfashionable these days. The government doesn't seem to want to publish the science it follows. Maybe they should of 'rolled their sleeves up' in the care homes and it would of been ok....jeez"

Research is being done. Before that models and estimates were available based on similar viruses.

It's not like a new pathogen has arrived from Mars. It's a virus, specifically a SARS type corona virus. The virologists, epidemiologists, immunologists, public health experts, etc are on it.

... If only we'd listen.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Getting back on topic, schools, yes I think Danes and French are showing us the way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ah, the old 'hate on teachers' mantra kicks in again. The marvelous right wing press.....no doubt fire fighters next. Junior doctors will be in for kick in again soon after Covid is manageable.

Obviously kids need to go back, but I think teachers are rightly worried about their exposure with no protection. Nobody sort of get why they might be a tad worried????

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Ah, the old 'hate on teachers' mantra kicks in again. The marvelous right wing press.....no doubt fire fighters next. Junior doctors will be in for kick in again soon after Covid is manageable.

Obviously kids need to go back, but I think teachers are rightly worried about their exposure with no protection. Nobody sort of get why they might be a tad worried????"

It blows my mind that it's the people working in public service roles that get so much stick.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So we can't praise another nation lol

But being some minds are already blown lol the other day a head teacher was ranting, yes ranting... how can we disinfect all the crayons, it's impossible! I thought a bucket of disinfectant as a holder?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"The question I heard posed today is why should teachers trust the government regarding schools? Where could teachers look for evidence of the government's competence with dealing with Covid 19?? Ah, maybe the advice they gave to care homes.....ahhh

Where could anyone get advice on covid lol it's a new virus and is causing every nation headaches, but some like the Danes have rolled their sleeves up "

Does rolling your sleeves up prevent you from catching the virus?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"The question I heard posed today is why should teachers trust the government regarding schools? Where could teachers look for evidence of the government's competence with dealing with Covid 19?? Ah, maybe the advice they gave to care homes.....ahhh

Where could anyone get advice on covid lol it's a new virus and is causing every nation headaches, but some like the Danes have rolled their sleeves up

Does rolling your sleeves up prevent you from catching the virus?"

The virus isn't scared of our ridiculous platitudes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"The question I heard posed today is why should teachers trust the government regarding schools? Where could teachers look for evidence of the government's competence with dealing with Covid 19?? Ah, maybe the advice they gave to care homes.....ahhh

Where could anyone get advice on covid lol it's a new virus and is causing every nation headaches, but some like the Danes have rolled their sleeves up

Does rolling your sleeves up prevent you from catching the virus?

The virus isn't scared of our ridiculous platitudes."

I'm sure boris said a while ago we should take it on the chin?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"The question I heard posed today is why should teachers trust the government regarding schools? Where could teachers look for evidence of the government's competence with dealing with Covid 19?? Ah, maybe the advice they gave to care homes.....ahhh

Where could anyone get advice on covid lol it's a new virus and is causing every nation headaches, but some like the Danes have rolled their sleeves up

Does rolling your sleeves up prevent you from catching the virus?

The virus isn't scared of our ridiculous platitudes.

I'm sure boris said a while ago we should take it on the chin?"

And something about common sense.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"The question I heard posed today is why should teachers trust the government regarding schools? Where could teachers look for evidence of the government's competence with dealing with Covid 19?? Ah, maybe the advice they gave to care homes.....ahhh

Where could anyone get advice on covid lol it's a new virus and is causing every nation headaches, but some like the Danes have rolled their sleeves up

Does rolling your sleeves up prevent you from catching the virus?

The virus isn't scared of our ridiculous platitudes.

I'm sure boris said a while ago we should take it on the chin?

And something about common sense."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think it's unfair to compare our schools to that of Denmark. I think Danish children dont start school til the age of 7 whereas we are expecting our nursery, reception and year 1 children to come in who are all younger than 7 and have no concept of social distancing whatsoever!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Was interesting I was listening to radio 5 debate and some survey guy said that according to surveys our country is much more pessimistic and cautious about the virus then everyone else in Europe according to their surveys.interesting

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Was interesting I was listening to radio 5 debate and some survey guy said that according to surveys our country is much more pessimistic and cautious about the virus then everyone else in Europe according to their surveys.interesting"

Might be to do with our abysmal death rate...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Schools have never closed looking after key workers children. I understand teacher's being worried after so many teachers have died because they mixed with young children? ??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Schools have never closed looking after key workers children. I understand teacher's being worried after so many teachers have died because they mixed with young children? ??"

Very few children in. Still, what's a few teachers lives eh??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arkb73Man
over a year ago

Cheshire/Staffs

Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Was interesting I was listening to radio 5 debate and some survey guy said that according to surveys our country is much more pessimistic and cautious about the virus then everyone else in Europe according to their surveys.interesting

Might be to do with our abysmal death rate..."

It was like that from day one

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Schools have never closed looking after key workers children. I understand teacher's being worried after so many teachers have died because they mixed with young children? ??

Very few children in. Still, what's a few teachers lives eh??"

no one asking for large classes, so more children means more teachers to return.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults. "

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool

Daily mail (I know)are reporting that the education minister has told teaching unions to 'do their duty'and tell teachers to go back to work.

The mail are also not to impressed with the unions threat of legal action if teachers are actually put at risk.

And people seriously expected things to change post covid.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??"

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Daily mail (I know)are reporting that the education minister has told teaching unions to 'do their duty'and tell teachers to go back to work.

The mail are also not to impressed with the unions threat of legal action if teachers are actually put at risk.

And people seriously expected things to change post covid."

Christ, they're not indentured servants.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arkb73Man
over a year ago

Cheshire/Staffs


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?"

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"Daily mail (I know)are reporting that the education minister has told teaching unions to 'do their duty'and tell teachers to go back to work.

The mail are also not to impressed with the unions threat of legal action if teachers are actually put at risk.

And people seriously expected things to change post covid."

Ha ha and 1 of the women in the teaching union is a 'communist lover of Cuba whose 1st word was strike.

Brilliant.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I saw report, they divided the class with tape, staggered play times, kids had to stay in groups of the same four the whole time, even playground was divided, an area for each small group, one got swings one got sandpit etc lots of hand washing etc

Everyone was happy with arrangements, teachers, parents and kids.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Daily mail (I know)are reporting that the education minister has told teaching unions to 'do their duty'and tell teachers to go back to work.

The mail are also not to impressed with the unions threat of legal action if teachers are actually put at risk.

And people seriously expected things to change post covid."

They have to get us to hate on somebody, single mums, junior doctors, benefit recipients, those on sick pay, fire fighters, nurses, Muslims, homeless......but just don't look at those running the show, don't....look over there...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here. "

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??"

That is to protect your mom, if she is fit and youngish should be ok. By next week rules might change anyway.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"Daily mail (I know)are reporting that the education minister has told teaching unions to 'do their duty'and tell teachers to go back to work.

The mail are also not to impressed with the unions threat of legal action if teachers are actually put at risk.

And people seriously expected things to change post covid.

They have to get us to hate on somebody, single mums, junior doctors, benefit recipients, those on sick pay, fire fighters, nurses, Muslims, homeless......but just don't look at those running the show, don't....look over there..."

Agreed.

They couldnt function without hating someone.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here. "

I'm guessing you are not a teacher are you??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arkb73Man
over a year ago

Cheshire/Staffs


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?"

If they don’t transmit it then what is the risk level?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?"

I have no idea how a virus would be able to infect adults and not children. That doesn't make any sense at all. And I'm seeing reports of clusters of symptoms in children, so...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?

If they don’t transmit it then what is the risk level? "

There is little evidence they don’t transmit. I know of 6 asymptomatic children who were tested after keyworker parents showed symptoms. 75 teachers dead with a 0.1% attendance .... extrapolate that’s 7500 teacher deaths. Is that acceptable that these people die just for the sake of child minding kids in an environment that is bad for the children’s mental health. Where is your compassion for education staff?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?

If they don’t transmit it then what is the risk level?

There is little evidence they don’t transmit. I know of 6 asymptomatic children who were tested after keyworker parents showed symptoms. 75 teachers dead with a 0.1% attendance .... extrapolate that’s 7500 teacher deaths. Is that acceptable that these people die just for the sake of child minding kids in an environment that is bad for the children’s mental health. Where is your compassion for education staff? "

Absolutely!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52648557

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleMissCaliWoman
over a year ago

all loved up


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?

If they don’t transmit it then what is the risk level?

There is little evidence they don’t transmit. I know of 6 asymptomatic children who were tested after keyworker parents showed symptoms. 75 teachers dead with a 0.1% attendance .... extrapolate that’s 7500 teacher deaths. Is that acceptable that these people die just for the sake of child minding kids in an environment that is bad for the children’s mental health. Where is your compassion for education staff? "

not taking away from the deaths but you can not say where the teachers caught it from. Could have been from the shop... petrol station.. family member etc.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?

If they don’t transmit it then what is the risk level?

There is little evidence they don’t transmit. I know of 6 asymptomatic children who were tested after keyworker parents showed symptoms. 75 teachers dead with a 0.1% attendance .... extrapolate that’s 7500 teacher deaths. Is that acceptable that these people die just for the sake of child minding kids in an environment that is bad for the children’s mental health. Where is your compassion for education staff? not taking away from the deaths but you can not say where the teachers caught it from. Could have been from the shop... petrol station.. family member etc. "

So put them at risk anyway when we don't know the risks??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52648557"

Yes, that's the one, thank you.

We don't know what the long term effects of this are, and kids are clearly being infected.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?

If they don’t transmit it then what is the risk level?

There is little evidence they don’t transmit. I know of 6 asymptomatic children who were tested after keyworker parents showed symptoms. 75 teachers dead with a 0.1% attendance .... extrapolate that’s 7500 teacher deaths. Is that acceptable that these people die just for the sake of child minding kids in an environment that is bad for the children’s mental health. Where is your compassion for education staff? not taking away from the deaths but you can not say where the teachers caught it from. Could have been from the shop... petrol station.. family member etc. "

So why is the population of teacher deaths higher than those of postal workers then? Surely they go to shops and get petrol? Why also are teachers not required to socially distance or wear masks? Why can they spend all day with 15 5 year olds but not see their 5 year old granddaughter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here

This time away from the classroom and learning is deeply damaging for the development of all children but most especially those who do not have access to tech equipment and online learning materials.

deaths figures show kids are less likely to die from covid, and research says they do not play a significant role in transmission.

teachers average age in the UK is 43

Deaths (Ages)

0-1 - 0

1-14 - 2 (with underlying issues)

15-44 - 382

Schools should be open and children being educated .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"This time away from the classroom and learning is deeply damaging for the development of all children but most especially those who do not have access to tech equipment and online learning materials.

deaths figures show kids are less likely to die from covid, and research says they do not play a significant role in transmission.

teachers average age in the UK is 43

Deaths (Ages)

0-1 - 0

1-14 - 2 (with underlying issues)

15-44 - 382

Schools should be open and children being educated .

"

Are you a teacher?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"This time away from the classroom and learning is deeply damaging for the development of all children but most especially those who do not have access to tech equipment and online learning materials.

deaths figures show kids are less likely to die from covid, and research says they do not play a significant role in transmission.

teachers average age in the UK is 43

Deaths (Ages)

0-1 - 0

1-14 - 2 (with underlying issues)

15-44 - 382

Schools should be open and children being educated .

"

Death is not the only bad outcome of illness.

I don't know why shielding children, who are almost always considered vulnerable in any evaluation of anything, is a bad thing.

It's an inescapable reality that the education and development of children will be impacted by the global trauma we're all going through.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This time away from the classroom and learning is deeply damaging for the development of all children but most especially those who do not have access to tech equipment and online learning materials.

deaths figures show kids are less likely to die from covid, and research says they do not play a significant role in transmission.

teachers average age in the UK is 43

Deaths (Ages)

0-1 - 0

1-14 - 2 (with underlying issues)

15-44 - 382

Schools should be open and children being educated .

Are you a teacher? "

I think we know the answer!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"This time away from the classroom and learning is deeply damaging for the development of all children but most especially those who do not have access to tech equipment and online learning materials.

deaths figures show kids are less likely to die from covid, and research says they do not play a significant role in transmission.

teachers average age in the UK is 43

Deaths (Ages)

0-1 - 0

1-14 - 2 (with underlying issues)

15-44 - 382

Schools should be open and children being educated .

Are you a teacher?

I think we know the answer!"

Hahah now come come he may actually have spent time in a classroom in the last 40 years. He may have an informed point to make - surely someone who has no relevant knowledge or experience in the sector we are talking about would be so arrogant as to make such sweeping statements.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South

*wouldn’t

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This time away from the classroom and learning is deeply damaging for the development of all children but most especially those who do not have access to tech equipment and online learning materials.

deaths figures show kids are less likely to die from covid, and research says they do not play a significant role in transmission.

teachers average age in the UK is 43

Deaths (Ages)

0-1 - 0

1-14 - 2 (with underlying issues)

15-44 - 382

Schools should be open and children being educated .

Are you a teacher?

I think we know the answer!

Hahah now come come he may actually have spent time in a classroom in the last 40 years. He may have an informed point to make - surely someone who has no relevant knowledge or experience in the sector we are talking about would be so arrogant as to make such sweeping statements. "

Seemingly, everybody is an expert.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleMissCaliWoman
over a year ago

all loved up


"

So put them at risk anyway when we don't know the risks??"

where have I said anyone should be put at risk. I'm pointing out that the sensationalist newspapers are making connections that could be not there.

No one should be at risk .... although I'm at risk day in day out as there is no other way to do what I do. Ppe isnt really an option.. so i take the choice to carry on...and I'm not even paid to do it.

There is numerous reports about children and this virus.. many conflicting ones... although many do seem to suggest that for some reason this virus doesn't cause children to be the germ Carriers that they normally are. The fact that teachers and pupils will be able to be tested is a good thing.

We do need to think about both the teachers and the children..and I think that children will find it almost impossible to social distance.

I have a school opposite me and while obviously it's only limited children in at the moment.. I've not really witnessed any social distancing when they are in the playground x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo

Ok lets not be personal, just debate instead

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"Ok lets not be personal, just debate instead"

It’s personal to the people at risk of dying

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleMissCaliWoman
over a year ago

all loved up


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?

If they don’t transmit it then what is the risk level?

There is little evidence they don’t transmit. I know of 6 asymptomatic children who were tested after keyworker parents showed symptoms. 75 teachers dead with a 0.1% attendance .... extrapolate that’s 7500 teacher deaths. Is that acceptable that these people die just for the sake of child minding kids in an environment that is bad for the children’s mental health. Where is your compassion for education staff? not taking away from the deaths but you can not say where the teachers caught it from. Could have been from the shop... petrol station.. family member etc.

So why is the population of teacher deaths higher than those of postal workers then? Surely they go to shops and get petrol? Why also are teachers not required to socially distance or wear masks? Why can they spend all day with 15 5 year olds but not see their 5 year old granddaughter. "

do we actually have a break down of jobs of people that have died.... I am not saying It isnt more risky but surely schools would be being shut if it was a direct link.. I dont have the answers just making a discussion...

And for the record lots of my friends are teachers that have been working this entire time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"Ok lets not be personal, just debate instead

It’s personal to the people at risk of dying "

Do as asked please

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here

I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?

If they don’t transmit it then what is the risk level?

There is little evidence they don’t transmit. I know of 6 asymptomatic children who were tested after keyworker parents showed symptoms. 75 teachers dead with a 0.1% attendance .... extrapolate that’s 7500 teacher deaths. Is that acceptable that these people die just for the sake of child minding kids in an environment that is bad for the children’s mental health. Where is your compassion for education staff? not taking away from the deaths but you can not say where the teachers caught it from. Could have been from the shop... petrol station.. family member etc.

So why is the population of teacher deaths higher than those of postal workers then? Surely they go to shops and get petrol? Why also are teachers not required to socially distance or wear masks? Why can they spend all day with 15 5 year olds but not see their 5 year old granddaughter. do we actually have a break down of jobs of people that have died.... I am not saying It isnt more risky but surely schools would be being shut if it was a direct link.. I dont have the answers just making a discussion...

And for the record lots of my friends are teachers that have been working this entire time. "

Yes we have a breakdown and schools are open to key workers at the moment - teachers are on a rota so are not exposed for continuous amounts of time. Also their are only 0.1% of pupils in attendance spread over the whole school so the pupil/ teacher ratio is high and the available space means lots of spacing. This won’t be the case when wider opening is achieved.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied."

We don't know the long term effects this disease has on anyone, including children. The data are preliminary.

Educational disruption needs to be balanced against health risk.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied."

The link I found said 26 teaching staff have died, that seems a lot if they are

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleMissCaliWoman
over a year ago

all loved up


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?

If they don’t transmit it then what is the risk level?

There is little evidence they don’t transmit. I know of 6 asymptomatic children who were tested after keyworker parents showed symptoms. 75 teachers dead with a 0.1% attendance .... extrapolate that’s 7500 teacher deaths. Is that acceptable that these people die just for the sake of child minding kids in an environment that is bad for the children’s mental health. Where is your compassion for education staff? not taking away from the deaths but you can not say where the teachers caught it from. Could have been from the shop... petrol station.. family member etc.

So why is the population of teacher deaths higher than those of postal workers then? Surely they go to shops and get petrol? Why also are teachers not required to socially distance or wear masks? Why can they spend all day with 15 5 year olds but not see their 5 year old granddaughter. do we actually have a break down of jobs of people that have died.... I am not saying It isnt more risky but surely schools would be being shut if it was a direct link.. I dont have the answers just making a discussion...

And for the record lots of my friends are teachers that have been working this entire time.

Yes we have a breakdown and schools are open to key workers at the moment - teachers are on a rota so are not exposed for continuous amounts of time. Also their are only 0.1% of pupils in attendance spread over the whole school so the pupil/ teacher ratio is high and the available space means lots of spacing. This won’t be the case when wider opening is achieved. "

I would also say that the children still going in currently are key workers children which sadly means they could be the ones more at risk of exposure. Something I discussed with a teacher a few days ago as I'd not even thought about it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"

And for the record lots of my friends are teachers that have been working this entire time.

"

Most schools have been doing a rota system, teachers are not there at all times

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied.

We don't know the long term effects this disease has on anyone, including children. The data are preliminary.

Educational disruption needs to be balanced against health risk."

Where the health risk appears to be considerably low and with an additional layer of protections in place, the advantages of having children back in classrooms learning would outweigh the very low/safe risks.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?

If they don’t transmit it then what is the risk level?

There is little evidence they don’t transmit. I know of 6 asymptomatic children who were tested after keyworker parents showed symptoms. 75 teachers dead with a 0.1% attendance .... extrapolate that’s 7500 teacher deaths. Is that acceptable that these people die just for the sake of child minding kids in an environment that is bad for the children’s mental health. Where is your compassion for education staff? not taking away from the deaths but you can not say where the teachers caught it from. Could have been from the shop... petrol station.. family member etc.

So why is the population of teacher deaths higher than those of postal workers then? Surely they go to shops and get petrol? Why also are teachers not required to socially distance or wear masks? Why can they spend all day with 15 5 year olds but not see their 5 year old granddaughter. do we actually have a break down of jobs of people that have died.... I am not saying It isnt more risky but surely schools would be being shut if it was a direct link.. I dont have the answers just making a discussion...

And for the record lots of my friends are teachers that have been working this entire time.

Yes we have a breakdown and schools are open to key workers at the moment - teachers are on a rota so are not exposed for continuous amounts of time. Also their are only 0.1% of pupils in attendance spread over the whole school so the pupil/ teacher ratio is high and the available space means lots of spacing. This won’t be the case when wider opening is achieved. "

Rota staff so you catch it if you spend a lot of time with someone infected. Ok open the pubs I only go in for an hour.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied.

We don't know the long term effects this disease has on anyone, including children. The data are preliminary.

Educational disruption needs to be balanced against health risk.

Where the health risk appears to be considerably low and with an additional layer of protections in place, the advantages of having children back in classrooms learning would outweigh the very low/safe risks."

I'm unconvinced at this stage.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied."

I believe that if you are commenting on what is and isn’t possible in a classroom you should have at least spent time in one recently. The best research you can do is spend a day with 15 potentially asymptomatic 6 year olds and then see how vulnerable you feel with no PPE or social distancing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"Schools aren’t care homes - there is some evidence that children don’t pass the virus on to adults.

This must be why my mum can't see my grandson then?? Where is the evidence? I have this feeling that nobody on this thread is a teacher??

I thought I'd read something about query new set of symptoms in children, but can't remember off the top of my head.

If we can't spare a thought for the teachers, surely everyone wants to protect kids?

At the risk of you reporting me, the new symptoms have affected a tiny number of kids. We are not thinking straight here.

Isnt it about the kids taking it home?

If they don’t transmit it then what is the risk level?

There is little evidence they don’t transmit. I know of 6 asymptomatic children who were tested after keyworker parents showed symptoms. 75 teachers dead with a 0.1% attendance .... extrapolate that’s 7500 teacher deaths. Is that acceptable that these people die just for the sake of child minding kids in an environment that is bad for the children’s mental health. Where is your compassion for education staff? not taking away from the deaths but you can not say where the teachers caught it from. Could have been from the shop... petrol station.. family member etc.

So why is the population of teacher deaths higher than those of postal workers then? Surely they go to shops and get petrol? Why also are teachers not required to socially distance or wear masks? Why can they spend all day with 15 5 year olds but not see their 5 year old granddaughter. do we actually have a break down of jobs of people that have died.... I am not saying It isnt more risky but surely schools would be being shut if it was a direct link.. I dont have the answers just making a discussion...

And for the record lots of my friends are teachers that have been working this entire time.

Yes we have a breakdown and schools are open to key workers at the moment - teachers are on a rota so are not exposed for continuous amounts of time. Also their are only 0.1% of pupils in attendance spread over the whole school so the pupil/ teacher ratio is high and the available space means lots of spacing. This won’t be the case when wider opening is achieved. Rota staff so you catch it if you spend a lot of time with someone infected. Ok open the pubs I only go in for an hour."

Viral load ....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Apparently you can only give an opinion if you’re a teacher. As this is the virus section who knew we had so many epidemiologists and virologists on fab.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"Apparently you can only give an opinion if you’re a teacher. As this is the virus section who knew we had so many epidemiologists and virologists on fab."

Haha that made me laugh - My point was just that the expectations people have of 5 year olds surprises me and I wondered if they knew this through experience or whether they were speculating. I cannot imagine 5 year olds washing hands themselves properly not needing cuddles or understanding social distancing so I wondered if someone who knew better could tell me I’m wrong.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oh it wasn’t aimed at you. Prior to Covid fab was full tariff experts.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied.

The link I found said 26 teaching staff have died, that seems a lot if they are"

Would be interesting to look at the age range for the teaching staff deaths.

Where the average age is 43, and the total eng/wal deaths in the age range 15-44 is 382, I wonder if a higher proportion of the 26 deaths were in the 50+ age group .

The other statistic, which is quite interesting is that of all the deaths where covid is mentioned, 10% were in the working age bracket (20-60 year old), and of those 10%, 80% had underlying medical conditions.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

It may be sad to see, and I have not, but it doesn't sound like anything that would cause damage.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well we have to come out of lockdown sometime, so got to work out how in a steady step by step way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *on12xxMan
over a year ago

leeds

If parents shielding where does child go to after school

Therefore splitting family up

It's not about kids getting it it's, about them poo asking it on and all grandparents picking up from school

September only option

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *on12xxMan
over a year ago

leeds


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied.

The link I found said 26 teaching staff have died, that seems a lot if they are

Would be interesting to look at the age range for the teaching staff deaths.

Where the average age is 43, and the total eng/wal deaths in the age range 15-44 is 382, I wonder if a higher proportion of the 26 deaths were in the 50+ age group .

The other statistic, which is quite interesting is that of all the deaths where covid is mentioned, 10% were in the working age bracket (20-60 year old), and of those 10%, 80% had underlying medical conditions.

"

Ever life is valuable

What a, selfish country we live in now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago

Northampton Somewhere


"If parents shielding where does child go to after school

Therefore splitting family up

It's not about kids getting it it's, about them poo asking it on and all grandparents picking up from school

September only option "

Someone asked that question on the news the other night. They were told that their child should go to school and the vunerable person should self isolate!!

I wouldn't be sending my r or yr1 back in 2 weeks, no way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *on12xxMan
over a year ago

leeds

So we're does the child live

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago

Northampton Somewhere


"So we're does the child live"

In their family home obviously. If they live with a parent who is vunerable, that parent must self isolate. That's what I meant. It's not going to work is it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *on12xxMan
over a year ago

leeds

I agree a mum can't self isolate from child for 12 weeks

AND If isolation doesn't work mums life, at risk

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *on12xxMan
over a year ago

leeds

So I'd child lives with a single parent how would that work who's shielding

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Here in France it’s not compulsory to send your child back to school and if you do then it’s only for two days a week.

The pictures of squares in the playground was from a materal which is three year olds up to five if they are out of napped.

Return to school is being staggered and our youngest is due to go back June 14th but we are not sending him.

One local school with 75 pupils asked parents who was coming back and only three are!!

Here all students will have to wear masks and there will be no canteen so no four course cooked lunch and social distance in place.

Crazy times but we are glad we are here and not in the UK during these times.

Stay frosty everyone!!!!

T

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

That was a great feature, British teachers and parents looking for problems Denmark just getting on with it and smiling all the way.

"

Maybe its more to do with the fact Denmark haven't had the same crisis, we have.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abs..Woman
over a year ago

..

The difference between the Denmark model and the model the government want is that they have no more than 15 in a class, they have small groups of no more than 5 children in a group. They can be outside a lot more. They have one adult with them all day and they don’t mix groups or staff. They have extra hand washing facilities outside.

Here schools can have a class of 15, no additional hand washing facilities, not enough staff for small groups.

It’s as though someone somewhere has liked the model but doesn’t want to go to the same length to secure it - not that you necessarily can in this country.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Surprise surprise, The Daily Fail slating unions for wanting to protect their members lives.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abs..Woman
over a year ago

..


"The question I heard posed today is why should teachers trust the government regarding schools? Where could teachers look for evidence of the government's competence with dealing with Covid 19?? Ah, maybe the advice they gave to care homes.....ahhh"

The questions I would want to be answered are - if social distancing is so important why isn’t it important in schools? I would also ask if children can carry (even if it may be small numbers) and shed the virus but scientists have no idea how much they shed, then how can it be safe to be around the children without the all important scientific evidence to back it up? And why if it is dangerous to meet in large groups is it ok for schools to have 200+ people in them all day every day?

Some teaching assistants are elbow deep in all sorts of bodily fluids in a daily basis and with nursery and reception going back to school their personal safety should be important because the little ones are going to be shedding all sorts.

I heard a minister say tat it is all about balance - no you can’t keep 2m in schools or public transport but we need people to get back to some normality.

If I was a member of school staff I wouldn’t be happy with that response.

And ... when did nursery appear? Boris didn’t mention it in his speech but they were part of the mix by the next day.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The question I heard posed today is why should teachers trust the government regarding schools? Where could teachers look for evidence of the government's competence with dealing with Covid 19?? Ah, maybe the advice they gave to care homes.....ahhh

The questions I would want to be answered are - if social distancing is so important why isn’t it important in schools? I would also ask if children can carry (even if it may be small numbers) and shed the virus but scientists have no idea how much they shed, then how can it be safe to be around the children without the all important scientific evidence to back it up? And why if it is dangerous to meet in large groups is it ok for schools to have 200+ people in them all day every day?

Some teaching assistants are elbow deep in all sorts of bodily fluids in a daily basis and with nursery and reception going back to school their personal safety should be important because the little ones are going to be shedding all sorts.

I heard a minister say tat it is all about balance - no you can’t keep 2m in schools or public transport but we need people to get back to some normality.

If I was a member of school staff I wouldn’t be happy with that response.

And ... when did nursery appear? Boris didn’t mention it in his speech but they were part of the mix by the next day. "

If it's down to viral load then teaching assistants will be dropping like flies. I heard the union had written to the government 3 times asking them to publish the science behind the decision.....still awaiting a response.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abs..Woman
over a year ago

..


"

If it's down to viral load then teaching assistants will be dropping like flies. I heard the union had written to the government 3 times asking them to publish the science behind the decision.....still awaiting a response."

They probably haven’t got the science behind their decision. It doesn’t instil confidence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lint-EverhardMan
over a year ago

Perpignan and cap

My daughter has been at cresh all week and the ladies were all wearing masks.

She's 2 on Monday.

No boxes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

If it's down to viral load then teaching assistants will be dropping like flies. I heard the union had written to the government 3 times asking them to publish the science behind the decision.....still awaiting a response.

They probably haven’t got the science behind their decision. It doesn’t instil confidence. "

Briefing them this morning apparently..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entralscotscpl7Couple
over a year ago

Falkirk

Our school is preparing to accept year one and year six back.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeBee67Man
over a year ago

Masked and Distant

Not 1st of June yet. Hopefully guidance out in plenty of time.

Some of us have been working all the way through, having to go into food production places, nursing homes, sheltered housing, hospitals.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entralscotscpl7Couple
over a year ago

Falkirk


"Not 1st of June yet. Hopefully guidance out in plenty of time.

Some of us have been working all the way through, having to go into food production places, nursing homes, sheltered housing, hospitals.

"

Yes in June I should have stated

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.

I can tell you.

I have been working in many schools during the lockdown and there is absolutely no way they can socially distance children even a smaller than average sized class will be near on impossible.

And what about special needs schools where teacher's have to get hands on ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeBee67Man
over a year ago

Masked and Distant


"I can tell you.

I have been working in many schools during the lockdown and there is absolutely no way they can socially distance children even a smaller than average sized class will be near on impossible.

And what about special needs schools where teacher's have to get hands on ?

"

Special needs schools have been open all the way through, and are still hands on. OH is a teacher at one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entralscotscpl7Couple
over a year ago

Falkirk

Our school sent out a WhatsApp poll asking parents if happy to send kids back to school.

Only 22% said yes.

As much as I want them to go back I really can't see how they are going to manage social distancing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abs..Woman
over a year ago

..


"Not 1st of June yet. Hopefully guidance out in plenty of time.

Some of us have been working all the way through, having to go into food production places, nursing homes, sheltered housing, hospitals.

"

Schools have been open all the way through as well.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entralscotscpl7Couple
over a year ago

Falkirk


"Not 1st of June yet. Hopefully guidance out in plenty of time.

Some of us have been working all the way through, having to go into food production places, nursing homes, sheltered housing, hospitals.

Schools have been open all the way through as well. "

Was it not just for children of key workers? Maybe I'm wrong.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeBee67Man
over a year ago

Masked and Distant


"Not 1st of June yet. Hopefully guidance out in plenty of time.

Some of us have been working all the way through, having to go into food production places, nursing homes, sheltered housing, hospitals.

Schools have been open all the way through as well.

Was it not just for children of key workers? Maybe I'm wrong."

Key workers children and children with special needs and those "at risk"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here

I appreciate there is much talk of not being able to socially distance.

If the science leads the conversation and there is strong evidence that the risks are very low in a school environment then there is no reason schools should not be opening.

Like in every other working environment, management should be planning how to make this happen, rather than fearing the ‘what ifs’

The unions can help with this by adopting a can do approach and work together to make sure children can be educated.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.


"I can tell you.

I have been working in many schools during the lockdown and there is absolutely no way they can socially distance children even a smaller than average sized class will be near on impossible.

And what about special needs schools where teacher's have to get hands on ?

Special needs schools have been open all the way through, and are still hands on. OH is a teacher at one."

I know they have I've been working in few of them and I seen their unable to social distance due to the nature of what they do do and that's on a far reduced capacity the normal if they opened properly it will be mayhem and a recipe for disaster

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeBee67Man
over a year ago

Masked and Distant

Sadly from my experience with them, unions are not "can do", more "oh no we wont do"

This country needs more positivity. Whatever can we do to help, what can we do to make things better.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entralscotscpl7Couple
over a year ago

Falkirk


"Sadly from my experience with them, unions are not "can do", more "oh no we wont do"

This country needs more positivity. Whatever can we do to help, what can we do to make things better."

It certainly seems the Teachers Union have said no to them returning.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Sadly from my experience with them, unions are not "can do", more "oh no we wont do"

This country needs more positivity. Whatever can we do to help, what can we do to make things better."

You still don't seem to be getting the point. Why should teachers trust this government when they advised care homes that the virus wouldn't really effect them??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I appreciate there is much talk of not being able to socially distance.

If the science leads the conversation and there is strong evidence that the risks are very low in a school environment then there is no reason schools should not be opening.

Like in every other working environment, management should be planning how to make this happen, rather than fearing the ‘what ifs’

The unions can help with this by adopting a can do approach and work together to make sure children can be educated.

"

So, in your view, what is an acceptable number of teachers to lose if the 'science' isn't right? All along we have been 'following the science' just ours seems to have been different.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here

If the scientists can show the risks are very low then this should be the leading subject of the dialogue with all stakeholders.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeBee67Man
over a year ago

Masked and Distant


"If the scientists can show the risks are very low then this should be the leading subject of the dialogue with all stakeholders. "

And both sides are meeting today. Let's hope they are open and public with the discussions and results.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The bottom line, we are asking teachers to trust a bloke who caught the virus after shaking hands with sufferers, despite being told by scientists, not to. I think it really is that simple.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The government are now saying they think it will be 99% safe for teachers in 2023 ,so put the kettle on put your feet up its going to be a long haul.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The government are now saying they think it will be 99% safe for teachers in 2023 ,so put the kettle on put your feet up its going to be a long haul. "

The government said care homes would be ok.....here lies the problem

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"Oh it wasn’t aimed at you. Prior to Covid fab was full tariff experts. "

She was the only one who had said it though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The government are now saying they think it will be 99% safe for teachers in 2023 ,so put the kettle on put your feet up its going to be a long haul.

The government said care homes would be ok.....here lies the problem"

When did they say that? First speech on lockdown was the old and vulnerable must be protected. But true never said care homes I give you that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"Sadly from my experience with them, unions are not "can do", more "oh no we wont do"

This country needs more positivity. Whatever can we do to help, what can we do to make things better.

It certainly seems the Teachers Union have said no to them returning.

"

They are looking out for the safety of their members.

It's their job.As clearly you wouldnt rely on the gmnt.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The government are now saying they think it will be 99% safe for teachers in 2023 ,so put the kettle on put your feet up its going to be a long haul.

The government said care homes would be ok.....here lies the problemWhen did they say that? First speech on lockdown was the old and vulnerable must be protected. But true never said care homes I give you that."

It's what the current furor is about between Starmer and Johnson..the advice didn't change to care homes till mid March I think.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"Sadly from my experience with them, unions are not "can do", more "oh no we wont do"

This country needs more positivity. Whatever can we do to help, what can we do to make things better."

From my experience unions bend over backwards.However they are there to look after the people in their union.

This is their primary concern and rightly so.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornyhappyCouple
over a year ago

perth

Cannot believe some of the comments on this post. What an incredibly selfish, self centred world we live in.

Social distancing in schools is virtually impossible, certainly with the younger age groups which for some bizarre reason the government seems to think ought to go back first.

Schools are effectively petri dishes for infection & always have been. If one child gets a cold or sickness bug or chicken pox then several will catch it, including staff, & they will also take it home to their families.

Whilst children don't seem to be badly affected by the virus itself, I've seen very little scientific evidence that they cannot spread it. Also, as a parent, I can absolutely understand why many parents are concerned about the potential risks to their children.

I can also see the major challenges of the whole thing from a teacher's point of view, having been primary school teacher for 20+ years.

Ultimately the government want children back in school, not because it is the best interests of the children, but because without schools opening it makes it far harder to get people back to work & in turn the economy back up & running.

It is also far too early to make judgements on how effective the French & Danish approaches have been.

K

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ounty durham bbw coupleCouple
over a year ago

darlington

We do need to try get st least some back before September all of them just turning up st once would be a nightmare a gradual reintroduction handled sensible makes sense

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleMissCaliWoman
over a year ago

all loved up


"Our school sent out a WhatsApp poll asking parents if happy to send kids back to school.

Only 22% said yes.

As much as I want them to go back I really can't see how they are going to manage social distancing.

"

to be fair with the school issue. There is more than the risk of infection. There is the worry on how the social distancing within schools and the changes to how things are done will effect the children mentally.

Can you imagine going to school and having to basically be in isolation.. isolation or being by yourself at school has been a punishment for a long time.

Many children with special needs would find ppe being worn hard to deal with too ( as I've found adults with these needs find it scary and disorientating enough)

So I think that side needs looking at as well as the possible risk to teachers and pupils. But we do need to start getting back to some sort of norm over the next few months but I have no idea what the answer is

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied.

The link I found said 26 teaching staff have died, that seems a lot if they are

Would be interesting to look at the age range for the teaching staff deaths.

Where the average age is 43, and the total eng/wal deaths in the age range 15-44 is 382, I wonder if a higher proportion of the 26 deaths were in the 50+ age group .

The other statistic, which is quite interesting is that of all the deaths where covid is mentioned, 10% were in the working age bracket (20-60 year old), and of those 10%, 80% had underlying medical conditions.

"

Does it matter what age group is? You could argue if they had underlying health issues they shouldn't have been put at risk at all

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

I have underlying medical conditions.

The idea that deaths are less significant because of it is a little disconcerting. Like I'm disposable somehow.

My conditions are very easily manageable and I'm not considered high risk.

But the narrative is really horrifying sometimes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entralscotscpl7Couple
over a year ago

Falkirk


"Our school sent out a WhatsApp poll asking parents if happy to send kids back to school.

Only 22% said yes.

As much as I want them to go back I really can't see how they are going to manage social distancing.

to be fair with the school issue. There is more than the risk of infection. There is the worry on how the social distancing within schools and the changes to how things are done will effect the children mentally.

Can you imagine going to school and having to basically be in isolation.. isolation or being by yourself at school has been a punishment for a long time.

Many children with special needs would find ppe being worn hard to deal with too ( as I've found adults with these needs find it scary and disorientating enough)

So I think that side needs looking at as well as the possible risk to teachers and pupils. But we do need to start getting back to some sort of norm over the next few months but I have no idea what the answer is "

Absolutely agree.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"The question I heard posed today is why should teachers trust the government regarding schools? Where could teachers look for evidence of the government's competence with dealing with Covid 19?? Ah, maybe the advice they gave to care homes.....ahhh

The questions I would want to be answered are - if social distancing is so important why isn’t it important in schools? I would also ask if children can carry (even if it may be small numbers) and shed the virus but scientists have no idea how much they shed, then how can it be safe to be around the children without the all important scientific evidence to back it up? And why if it is dangerous to meet in large groups is it ok for schools to have 200+ people in them all day every day?

Some teaching assistants are elbow deep in all sorts of bodily fluids in a daily basis and with nursery and reception going back to school their personal safety should be important because the little ones are going to be shedding all sorts.

I heard a minister say tat it is all about balance - no you can’t keep 2m in schools or public transport but we need people to get back to some normality.

If I was a member of school staff I wouldn’t be happy with that response.

And ... when did nursery appear? Boris didn’t mention it in his speech but they were part of the mix by the next day.

If it's down to viral load then teaching assistants will be dropping like flies. I heard the union had written to the government 3 times asking them to publish the science behind the decision.....still awaiting a response."

These unions should just adopt a"can do'approach.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied.

The link I found said 26 teaching staff have died, that seems a lot if they are

Would be interesting to look at the age range for the teaching staff deaths.

Where the average age is 43, and the total eng/wal deaths in the age range 15-44 is 382, I wonder if a higher proportion of the 26 deaths were in the 50+ age group .

The other statistic, which is quite interesting is that of all the deaths where covid is mentioned, 10% were in the working age bracket (20-60 year old), and of those 10%, 80% had underlying medical conditions.

Does it matter what age group is? You could argue if they had underlying health issues they shouldn't have been put at risk at all"

Yes, as the scientists find out how the virus works then the teachers in a specific age group and/or with underlying health conditions can be identified and provided with specific advice.

We cant prevent schools from opening because there is a small chance that a small number of people may contract the virus.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied.

The link I found said 26 teaching staff have died, that seems a lot if they are

Would be interesting to look at the age range for the teaching staff deaths.

Where the average age is 43, and the total eng/wal deaths in the age range 15-44 is 382, I wonder if a higher proportion of the 26 deaths were in the 50+ age group .

The other statistic, which is quite interesting is that of all the deaths where covid is mentioned, 10% were in the working age bracket (20-60 year old), and of those 10%, 80% had underlying medical conditions.

Does it matter what age group is? You could argue if they had underlying health issues they shouldn't have been put at risk at all

Yes, as the scientists find out how the virus works then the teachers in a specific age group and/or with underlying health conditions can be identified and provided with specific advice.

We cant prevent schools from opening because there is a small chance that a small number of people may contract the virus.

"

They are not asking not to open, they are asking for adequate protection.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I have underlying medical conditions.

The idea that deaths are less significant because of it is a little disconcerting. Like I'm disposable somehow.

My conditions are very easily manageable and I'm not considered high risk.

But the narrative is really horrifying sometimes "

Totally, but it's this long standing right wing narrative that labels you as lazy, with too many holidays. The continual bashing of public sector workers has been really damaging.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"I have underlying medical conditions.

The idea that deaths are less significant because of it is a little disconcerting. Like I'm disposable somehow.

My conditions are very easily manageable and I'm not considered high risk.

But the narrative is really horrifying sometimes

Totally, but it's this long standing right wing narrative that labels you as lazy, with too many holidays. The continual bashing of public sector workers has been really damaging. "

Absolutely.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied.

The link I found said 26 teaching staff have died, that seems a lot if they are

Would be interesting to look at the age range for the teaching staff deaths.

Where the average age is 43, and the total eng/wal deaths in the age range 15-44 is 382, I wonder if a higher proportion of the 26 deaths were in the 50+ age group .

The other statistic, which is quite interesting is that of all the deaths where covid is mentioned, 10% were in the working age bracket (20-60 year old), and of those 10%, 80% had underlying medical conditions.

Does it matter what age group is? You could argue if they had underlying health issues they shouldn't have been put at risk at all

Yes, as the scientists find out how the virus works then the teachers in a specific age group and/or with underlying health conditions can be identified and provided with specific advice.

We cant prevent schools from opening because there is a small chance that a small number of people may contract the virus.

"

To be fair I didn't say any of that, in fact I have not given my opinion of whether I think they schools should stay shut or not.

The issue I have is the implication that if people are of a certain age then maybe there shouldn't be a surprise if they die. People of all ages have died of this, some with no conditions at all.

Also having health conditions isn't subject to age. People with health conditions can and do manage them for many years. Saying oh well they may have been over 60 or have health conditions is like people said at the beginning of all this..which seemed to be it is ok, only 70's will get it as if the over 70's don't matter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied.

The link I found said 26 teaching staff have died, that seems a lot if they are

Would be interesting to look at the age range for the teaching staff deaths.

Where the average age is 43, and the total eng/wal deaths in the age range 15-44 is 382, I wonder if a higher proportion of the 26 deaths were in the 50+ age group .

The other statistic, which is quite interesting is that of all the deaths where covid is mentioned, 10% were in the working age bracket (20-60 year old), and of those 10%, 80% had underlying medical conditions.

Does it matter what age group is? You could argue if they had underlying health issues they shouldn't have been put at risk at all

Yes, as the scientists find out how the virus works then the teachers in a specific age group and/or with underlying health conditions can be identified and provided with specific advice.

We cant prevent schools from opening because there is a small chance that a small number of people may contract the virus.

To be fair I didn't say any of that, in fact I have not given my opinion of whether I think they schools should stay shut or not.

The issue I have is the implication that if people are of a certain age then maybe there shouldn't be a surprise if they die. People of all ages have died of this, some with no conditions at all.

Also having health conditions isn't subject to age. People with health conditions can and do manage them for many years. Saying oh well they may have been over 60 or have health conditions is like people said at the beginning of all this..which seemed to be it is ok, only 70's will get it as if the over 70's don't matter

"

I developed my lifelong incurable medical condition when I was thirteen. It's eminently manageable.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied.

The link I found said 26 teaching staff have died, that seems a lot if they are

Would be interesting to look at the age range for the teaching staff deaths.

Where the average age is 43, and the total eng/wal deaths in the age range 15-44 is 382, I wonder if a higher proportion of the 26 deaths were in the 50+ age group .

The other statistic, which is quite interesting is that of all the deaths where covid is mentioned, 10% were in the working age bracket (20-60 year old), and of those 10%, 80% had underlying medical conditions.

Does it matter what age group is? You could argue if they had underlying health issues they shouldn't have been put at risk at all

Yes, as the scientists find out how the virus works then the teachers in a specific age group and/or with underlying health conditions can be identified and provided with specific advice.

We cant prevent schools from opening because there is a small chance that a small number of people may contract the virus.

To be fair I didn't say any of that, in fact I have not given my opinion of whether I think they schools should stay shut or not.

The issue I have is the implication that if people are of a certain age then maybe there shouldn't be a surprise if they die. People of all ages have died of this, some with no conditions at all.

Also having health conditions isn't subject to age. People with health conditions can and do manage them for many years. Saying oh well they may have been over 60 or have health conditions is like people said at the beginning of all this..which seemed to be it is ok, only 70's will get it as if the over 70's don't matter

"

If the science and data suggests the risk is very low in the school environment, and advice is given based on that, I don't believe highlighting this analysis is the same thing as suggesting there is an implication that if people are of a certain age then maybe there shouldn't be a surprise if they die.

I certainly haven't said that.

If the data points to a particular set of people being most vulnerable then it is these people who should receive the most protection. Thats my view.

To restrict and affect all of the school environment, because there is a very small percentage of people in that environment may have a very small chance of catching the virus, makes no sense

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I work in Special Needs and what used to called EBD schools as an agency worker, not at the moment because my day rate isn't worth increasing my risk of getting COVID-19, and those students who are capable of understanding all of this are allowed to wear masks, PPE etc.....the staff however are NOT allowed and are NOT being provided PPE, gloves, hand gel etc as 'it may cause anxiety in the learner'

Also as someone who worked with learners who need 1-2-1 personal care or 1-2-1 help in their lessons you CANNOT do this by social distance.

There needs to be Plan A and Plan B and Plan C and all the plans to make it safe for EVERYONE to be back at school.

Most Teachers I know WANT to be back at school with their learners but at the right time with the plans. Is that too much to ask? Schools are NOT babysitting services.

Schools are NOT Day Care Centres.

Schools are NOT childminders.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"I work in Special Needs and what used to called EBD schools as an agency worker, not at the moment because my day rate isn't worth increasing my risk of getting COVID-19, and those students who are capable of understanding all of this are allowed to wear masks, PPE etc.....the staff however are NOT allowed and are NOT being provided PPE, gloves, hand gel etc as 'it may cause anxiety in the learner'

Also as someone who worked with learners who need 1-2-1 personal care or 1-2-1 help in their lessons you CANNOT do this by social distance.

There needs to be Plan A and Plan B and Plan C and all the plans to make it safe for EVERYONE to be back at school.

Most Teachers I know WANT to be back at school with their learners but at the right time with the plans. Is that too much to ask? Schools are NOT babysitting services.

Schools are NOT Day Care Centres.

Schools are NOT childminders."

I support you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I work in Special Needs and what used to called EBD schools as an agency worker, not at the moment because my day rate isn't worth increasing my risk of getting COVID-19, and those students who are capable of understanding all of this are allowed to wear masks, PPE etc.....the staff however are NOT allowed and are NOT being provided PPE, gloves, hand gel etc as 'it may cause anxiety in the learner'

Also as someone who worked with learners who need 1-2-1 personal care or 1-2-1 help in their lessons you CANNOT do this by social distance.

There needs to be Plan A and Plan B and Plan C and all the plans to make it safe for EVERYONE to be back at school.

Most Teachers I know WANT to be back at school with their learners but at the right time with the plans. Is that too much to ask? Schools are NOT babysitting services.

Schools are NOT Day Care Centres.

Schools are NOT childminders.

I support you."

Thank you. And I'm sure the majority of people do support those of us who work in education. And yes, having kids at home all day everyday is hard work without a break. I understand. But today while I was running my errands I saw 2 funeral cars. One of them had a very small casket in the funeral car.

No-one wants anymore caskets and following the rules and adjusting to 'the new normal' for a bit longer is what's needed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ailymaleMan
over a year ago

salford/Eccles

When MPs decide it’s perfectly safe for them all to be back at Westminster is the time when everyone else should get back to normal. If they’re not risking anything for themselves then they should expect any other profession do so either. (NHS worker here)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh it wasn’t aimed at you. Prior to Covid fab was full tariff experts.

She was the only one who had said it though."

Oh no she wasn’t.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"When MPs decide it’s perfectly safe for them all to be back at Westminster is the time when everyone else should get back to normal. If they’re not risking anything for themselves then they should expect any other profession do so either. (NHS worker here) "

Brilliant point

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"When MPs decide it’s perfectly safe for them all to be back at Westminster is the time when everyone else should get back to normal. If they’re not risking anything for themselves then they should expect any other profession do so either. (NHS worker here)

Brilliant point"

Yup. If it's good enough for them it's good enough for us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here


"When MPs decide it’s perfectly safe for them all to be back at Westminster is the time when everyone else should get back to normal. If they’re not risking anything for themselves then they should expect any other profession do so either. (NHS worker here)

Brilliant point

Yup. If it's good enough for them it's good enough for us."

I know it's often said that the performances inside the House of Commons are comparable with those in a school playground, but it doesn't make any sense to follow the "if it's ok for them it's ok for the rest of us" logic.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"

To restrict and affect all of the school environment, because there is a very small percentage of people in that environment may have a very small chance of catching the virus, makes no sense

"

Which wasn't what I said at all

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here


"

To restrict and affect all of the school environment, because there is a very small percentage of people in that environment may have a very small chance of catching the virus, makes no sense

Which wasn't what I said at all "

I didn’t say you did

I said it - it’s my opinion

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"I don’t believe you need to be a teacher to have an opinion based on verified statistics and researched analysis.

I believe the bigger picture here is the valuable education children, especially those from disadvantaged homes and communities, are being denied.

The link I found said 26 teaching staff have died, that seems a lot if they are

Would be interesting to look at the age range for the teaching staff deaths.

Where the average age is 43, and the total eng/wal deaths in the age range 15-44 is 382, I wonder if a higher proportion of the 26 deaths were in the 50+ age group .

The other statistic, which is quite interesting is that of all the deaths where covid is mentioned, 10% were in the working age bracket (20-60 year old), and of those 10%, 80% had underlying medical conditions.

Does it matter what age group is? You could argue if they had underlying health issues they shouldn't have been put at risk at all

Yes, as the scientists find out how the virus works then the teachers in a specific age group and/or with underlying health conditions can be identified and provided with specific advice.

We cant prevent schools from opening because there is a small chance that a small number of people may contract the virus.

To be fair I didn't say any of that, in fact I have not given my opinion of whether I think they schools should stay shut or not.

The issue I have is the implication that if people are of a certain age then maybe there shouldn't be a surprise if they die. People of all ages have died of this, some with no conditions at all.

Also having health conditions isn't subject to age. People with health conditions can and do manage them for many years. Saying oh well they may have been over 60 or have health conditions is like people said at the beginning of all this..which seemed to be it is ok, only 70's will get it as if the over 70's don't matter

If the science and data suggests the risk is very low in the school environment, and advice is given based on that, I don't believe highlighting this analysis is the same thing as suggesting there is an implication that if people are of a certain age then maybe there shouldn't be a surprise if they die.

I certainly haven't said that.

If the data points to a particular set of people being most vulnerable then it is these people who should receive the most protection. Thats my view.

To restrict and affect all of the school environment, because there is a very small percentage of people in that environment may have a very small chance of catching the virus, makes no sense

"

The point being regardless of risk social distancing is required in all other areas .. supermarkets, B&Q, construction sites etc and if employers are not doing that employees are being asked to report them. But education staff are not being given the same consideration not even being offered PPE.... we are not asking more more we are asking for equal. Regardless of transmission rates to whichever groups of adults or children all of the people in schools are at a great risk of infection than any other keyworker (apart from care and NHS workers with inadequate PPE) than any other sector.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South

*greater risk

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"

To restrict and affect all of the school environment, because there is a very small percentage of people in that environment may have a very small chance of catching the virus, makes no sense

Which wasn't what I said at all

I didn’t say you did

I said it - it’s my opinion "

Well you did answer it on the post you quoted as if we had been discussing it. Glad you confirmed it wasn't something I had been discussing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"Oh it wasn’t aimed at you. Prior to Covid fab was full tariff experts.

She was the only one who had said it though.

Oh no she wasn’t."

Admittedly I have only skimmed past the thread a second time but I still don't see any more people implying that he shouldn't have a view because he isn't a teacher, there was one other asking was he a teacher.

Maybe quote the person you are talking about rather than just throw away a comment that isn't being backed up by you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eddy and legsCouple
over a year ago

the wetlands

A lot of negativity

Let's see a few suggestions instead of complaining, how would you do it and make sure it works

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" The point being regardless of risk social distancing is required in all other areas .. supermarkets, B&Q, construction sites etc and if employers are not doing that employees are being asked to report them. But education staff are not being given the same consideration not even being offered PPE.... we are not asking more more we are asking for equal. Regardless of transmission rates to whichever groups of adults or children all of the people in schools are at a great risk of infection than any other keyworker (apart from care and NHS workers with inadequate PPE) than any other sector. "

have teachers or parents been provided specifics on what the practical plans in schools will actually be yet or is this based on assumption?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"A lot of negativity

Let's see a few suggestions instead of complaining, how would you do it and make sure it works"

Simple answer is it won’t work until there is significantly better track and trace. Social distancing isn’t possible in schools - nothing else is relevant. Staff experience all kinds of bodily fluids on a daily basis. being forced to socially distance I believe will have a worse affect on mental health. I believe a targeted approach identifying those children at risk at home should be identified by the social care sector and then those children provided with options as are key workers at the moment. Until extra room, staff and hygiene facilities are set up then in primary school a return isn’t possible without significant risk.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


" The point being regardless of risk social distancing is required in all other areas .. supermarkets, B&Q, construction sites etc and if employers are not doing that employees are being asked to report them. But education staff are not being given the same consideration not even being offered PPE.... we are not asking more more we are asking for equal. Regardless of transmission rates to whichever groups of adults or children all of the people in schools are at a great risk of infection than any other keyworker (apart from care and NHS workers with inadequate PPE) than any other sector.

have teachers or parents been provided specifics on what the practical plans in schools will actually be yet or is this based on assumption?"

Personal experience and directive from my head teacher this morning

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo

It doesn't seem like the meeting today got the unions the answers they wanted so who knows what happens now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It doesn't seem like the meeting today got the unions the answers they wanted so who knows what happens now"

i assume teachers can refuse to work quoting inappropriate health and safety procedures in place

and the government know this why is why i asked if it was based on direct information about the reopening or assumptions

seems insane they would bother even wasting time with half measures that they know teachers are well within their rights to refuse

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here

[Removed by poster at 15/05/20 17:23:27]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here

Former Labour education secretary David Blunkett yesterday reported teachers’ unions were ‘working against the interests of children’.

News that the unions are still not convinced by the assurances given by CSA, CMA, SAGE etc. is not surprising.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"Former Labour education secretary David She yesterday reported teachers’ unions were ‘working against the interests of children’.

News that unions are still not convinced by the assurances given by CSA, CMA, SAGE etc. is not surprising.

"

TeaCher bashing by Blunkett - nothing new there. Daily fail is even worse

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Schools are not going to open the government is wasting it time, the days of sitting down and sorting problems out left us years ago. Now society just asks whos going to tell us how to sort this out, not my problem, more than my jobs worth. God help us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"It doesn't seem like the meeting today got the unions the answers they wanted so who knows what happens now

i assume teachers can refuse to work quoting inappropriate health and safety procedures in place

and the e government know this why is why i asked if it was based on direct information about the reopening or assumptions

seems insane they would bother even wastingo time with half measures that they know teachers are well within their rights to refuse "

I believe it is an intentional passing of the buck so they are seen to be Doing the right thing while abdicating themselves of responsibility...... blame the lazy teachers for not wanting to be heroes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

I don't have kids, but I would do everything in my power to keep my hypothetical kids out of school now and for the foreseeable future. There's evidence this can harm children, and I would not be prepared to put my children at risk.

Every child is going to be suffering educationally. Right now let's stop them getting god only knows what long term health consequences.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"Schools are not going to open the government is wasting it time, the days of sitting down and sorting problems out left us years ago. Now society just asks whos going to tell us how to sort this out, not my problem, more than my jobs worth. God help us. "

Dying is more than my 20k job is worth - I agree

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It doesn't seem like the meeting today got the unions the answers they wanted so who knows what happens now

i assume teachers can refuse to work quoting inappropriate health and safety procedures in place

and the e government know this why is why i asked if it was based on direct information about the reopening or assumptions

seems insane they would bother even wastingo time with half measures that they know teachers are well within their rights to refuse

I believe it is an intentional passing of the buck so they are seen to be Doing the right thing while abdicating themselves of responsibility...... blame the lazy teachers for not wanting to be heroes "

i really need to work on the autocorrect on my phone didnt realise how bad it was til i saw you quote me... new phone cover is driving me mad

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here

Radio 4 Today programme:

“It’s about whether we can work together to do it or whether we can work against it. And I advise both teachers and their representatives, and my own frontbench, to work together to actually find a way of gradually, from 1 June, getting those children back into school."

Given what the scientist know and the data available, does seem strange the unions appear to be working against all of this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Schools are not going to open the government is wasting it time, the days of sitting down and sorting problems out left us years ago. Now society just asks whos going to tell us how to sort this out, not my problem, more than my jobs worth. God help us.

Dying is more than my 20k job is worth - I agree "

Your cleave people can't you sit down and try to work something out, can't keep kicking the can down the road.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"Radio 4 Today programme:

“It’s about whether we can work together to do it or whether we can work against it. And I advise both teachers and their representatives, and my own frontbench, to work together to actually find a way of gradually, from 1 June, getting those children back into school."

Given what the scientist know and the data available, does seem strange the unions appear to be working against all of this.

"

Point being is that the people that are in the know actually in schools do not believe this can be done safely on the 1st June..... unions are offering and welcoming dialogue to support a return but only when it is safe and we cannot put a date on that. NEU have sent 5 requests to the government to collaborate and they have been ignored this directive has been sent out with no input from the sector itself.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South


"Schools are not going to open the government is wasting it time, the days of sitting down and sorting problems out left us years ago. Now society just asks whos going to tell us how to sort this out, not my problem, more than my jobs worth. God help us.

Dying is more than my 20k job is worth - I agree Your cleave people can't you sit down and try to work something out, can't keep kicking the can down the road. "

Cleave? If you mean can then see my post above

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here


"Radio 4 Today programme:

“It’s about whether we can work together to do it or whether we can work against it. And I advise both teachers and their representatives, and my own frontbench, to work together to actually find a way of gradually, from 1 June, getting those children back into school."

Given what the scientist know and the data available, does seem strange the unions appear to be working against all of this.

Point being is that the people that are in the know actually in schools do not believe this can be done safely on the 1st June..... unions are offering and welcoming dialogue to support a return but only when it is safe and we cannot put a date on that. NEU have sent 5 requests to the government to collaborate and they have been ignored this directive has been sent out with no input from the sector itself. "

Point is the scientific evidence, analysis and data has just been presented by the people who are at the very heart of this situation, and you are suggesting that the unions know better because they know more about what happens inside a classroom.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Radio 4 Today programme:

“It’s about whether we can work together to do it or whether we can work against it. And I advise both teachers and their representatives, and my own frontbench, to work together to actually find a way of gradually, from 1 June, getting those children back into school."

Given what the scientist know and the data available, does seem strange the unions appear to be working against all of this.

Point being is that the people that are in the know actually in schools do not believe this can be done safely on the 1st June..... unions are offering and welcoming dialogue to support a return but only when it is safe and we cannot put a date on that. NEU have sent 5 requests to the government to collaborate and they have been ignored this directive has been sent out with no input from the sector itself. "

there was never any intention of everyone being back on 1st june though, is it not 2 years worth of primary school pupils? first and last? similarly 2 years in secondary schools

so that solves the immediate issue of staff numbers/ space required to social distance surely? and then there is another 4 months to brainstorm for after summer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"Former Labour education secretary David She yesterday reported teachers’ unions were ‘working against the interests of children’.

News that unions are still not convinced by the assurances given by CSA, CMA, SAGE etc. is not surprising.

TeaCher bashing by Blunkett - nothing new there. Daily fail is even worse "

He may aswell be a Tory.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ionelhutzMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"Former Labour education secretary David Blunkett yesterday reported teachers’ unions were ‘working against the interests of children’.

News that the unions are still not convinced by the assurances given by CSA, CMA, SAGE etc. is not surprising.

"

The same unions who have contacted the gmnt 5 times without response presumably?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top