FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Virus

No good deed goes unpunished

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

So there are some of us who respect the rules, stay at home and won't get COVID-19.

Then there are others who flaunt the rules and will get the virus.

Looking forward at immunity passports etc. It is ironic that those who didn't follow the rules and got infected because of that will be free to work, travel etc. Whilst those who stayed at home will be at a disadvantage for their co-operation.

I do not mean to suggest that everyone who got infected broke the rules. I am only referring to those who didn't think the rules applied to them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So there are some of us who respect the rules, stay at home and won't get COVID-19.

Then there are others who flaunt the rules and will get the virus.

Looking forward at immunity passports etc. It is ironic that those who didn't follow the rules and got infected because of that will be free to work, travel etc. Whilst those who stayed at home will be at a disadvantage for their co-operation.

I do not mean to suggest that everyone who got infected broke the rules. I am only referring to those who didn't think the rules applied to them."

Mr stayed at home only for the mrs who is key worker catching it at work and passing it on.

But hey ho it is what it is.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

There weren't previously that many people tested and there's uncertainty how long antibodies will remain in the body. There may be no immunity passports. Employers will want people in, if they have made adjustments for distancing.

There are now so many loopholes for people to be together that there will be greater levels of infection passed on that could have been avoided.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnnikCouple
over a year ago

Walsall


"So there are some of us who respect the rules, stay at home and won't get COVID-19.

Then there are others who flaunt the rules and will get the virus.

Looking forward at immunity passports etc. It is ironic that those who didn't follow the rules and got infected because of that will be free to work, travel etc. Whilst those who stayed at home will be at a disadvantage for their co-operation.

I do not mean to suggest that everyone who got infected broke the rules. I am only referring to those who didn't think the rules applied to them."

Is this not your Facebook post... Nik?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovestrapMan
over a year ago

London


"So there are some of us who respect the rules, stay at home and won't get COVID-19.

Then there are others who flaunt the rules and will get the virus.

Looking forward at immunity passports etc. It is ironic that those who didn't follow the rules and got infected because of that will be free to work, travel etc. Whilst those who stayed at home will be at a disadvantage for their co-operation.

I do not mean to suggest that everyone who got infected broke the rules. I am only referring to those who didn't think the rules applied to them."

Surely that is what you are suggesting? Starting with your post title?

There were more people who got infected that followed the rules. Than the once who though the rules did not apply to them. And then got infected.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So there are some of us who respect the rules, stay at home and won't get COVID-19.

Then there are others who flaunt the rules and will get the virus.

Looking forward at immunity passports etc. It is ironic that those who didn't follow the rules and got infected because of that will be free to work, travel etc. Whilst those who stayed at home will be at a disadvantage for their co-operation.

I do not mean to suggest that everyone who got infected broke the rules. I am only referring to those who didn't think the rules applied to them.

Is this not your Facebook post... Nik? "

What's Facebook?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So there are some of us who respect the rules, stay at home and won't get COVID-19.

Then there are others who flaunt the rules and will get the virus.

Looking forward at immunity passports etc. It is ironic that those who didn't follow the rules and got infected because of that will be free to work, travel etc. Whilst those who stayed at home will be at a disadvantage for their co-operation.

I do not mean to suggest that everyone who got infected broke the rules. I am only referring to those who didn't think the rules applied to them.

Surely that is what you are suggesting? Starting with your post title?

There were more people who got infected that followed the rules. Than the once who though the rules did not apply to them. And then got infected.

"

No the last paragraph makes my point abundantly clear, preempting this misinterpretation.

I am talking about people who got infected because they broke the rules. They are now at an advantage. It is was it is. But what it is.... is ironic.

I would like to go to PDI in October. But what are the chances I can't go because I won't pass an antbody test?

Let's say I can go but get infected on holiday snd spend my holiday in quarantine. Something the rule flouters don't have worry about.

Effectively there is a reward for breaking the rules and getting infected and then immune, and a punishment for staying at home and being potential risk.

Not bitching. Just pointing out the irony.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cd and scruffCouple
over a year ago

Rochester

Some people dont have, the luxury of staying at home and staying safe. There are millions of key workers risking their lives, everyday so other people can stay at home safe, and, moan about not being able to go on holiday this year

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
over a year ago

Leeds

Do you think all the people infected in care homes broke the rules ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top