FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Virus

Testing Stats

Jump to newest
 

By *uckymoo OP   Man
over a year ago

Mid-Cheshire

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1109066/coronavirus-testing-in-europe-by-country/

USA n/a

Germany 1.7m tested

UK 382k tested

Number of confirmed

USA 679K

Germany 137k

UK 103k

https://www.statista.com/page/covid-19-coronavirus

Not drawing any conclusions you will already have your own, but those who are interested this is a good source or ref.

Russia and Italy very very high on number of tested not Just Germany, so maybe each country has its own unique situation so one plan does not fit all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

I guess it helps when you don't have your chief medical officer telling your prime minister that testing isn't all that important

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uckymoo OP   Man
over a year ago

Mid-Cheshire


"I guess it helps when you don't have your chief medical officer telling your prime minister that testing isn't all that important "

Well when you actually look at the numbers thats a lot of resource on testing to identify such a low number of positive tests.

Getting people locked down is key

Testing the key workers is priority

Then once antibody test is ready then we do need to test hard and fast.

If we had tested more the actions would still be the same, lock down, isolate etc.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"I guess it helps when you don't have your chief medical officer telling your prime minister that testing isn't all that important

Well when you actually look at the numbers thats a lot of resource on testing to identify such a low number of positive tests.

Getting people locked down is key

Testing the key workers is priority

Then once antibody test is ready then we do need to test hard and fast.

If we had tested more the actions would still be the same, lock down, isolate etc.

"

If we had tested more people then the infected wouldn't have spread it as much, that's the real benefit. I take your point about the % of positive tests but it's a small price compared to the cost of lockdown.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top