FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Virus

Age Restriction

Jump to newest
 

By *uysx2 OP   Couple (MM)
over a year ago

Birmingham

How would you feel if the current restrictions were relaxed but it came with an age restriction stating that only those under 30 could go out?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

What exactly would that solve?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ovegames42Man
over a year ago

london

This virus has no boundaries

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustfun 1984Man
over a year ago

exeter


"How would you feel if the current restrictions were relaxed but it came with an age restriction stating that only those under 30 could go out?"

Why under 30 age isn't a factor in this all age can and have been infected????

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erfume-LoverMan
over a year ago

Lothian area

[Removed by poster at 09/04/20 21:57:25]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erfume-LoverMan
over a year ago

Lothian area

And let all the Neds and low life run riot .....great idea

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire

Under 30's may be statistically less likely to die, but they have the same likelihood as every other age group of spreading it.

Spread it again and watch a double peak.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You guys are 39 and 42.....so thats you fucked.

But great idea to let the numpties run wikd and spread it everywhere

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

*wild.....had a few gins!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I'm good with following robust evidence to make policy decisions.

I'm not sure we have it for such a decision. Younger people, as typically socially active and gregarious, could be the perfect vector to spread the virus both amongst each other, babies and the elderly.

Many people across age groups show minimal symptoms and there's a lag from getting it, to when symptoms, if any, show up.

I'd not rush to consider this group for early release.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

Then the following weekend everyone with a brown hat can go out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Logan’s run world

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ncutgemMan
over a year ago

Bath ish

It the ones under 30 that are currently ignoring STAY at home I think its a good idea as they think the virus is not a serious problem Ban them from Hospitals

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itty9899Man
over a year ago

Craggy Island

I think the under 30 should stay indoors virus or no virus.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We're basically in lockdown because people couldn't follow simple guidelines, so if anyone thinks those who fall outside of the under 30s limit would just accept that is nuts.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I just read tabloid articles about a 28 year old bloke, and 29 year old woman, both with no underlying health conditions who died within days of their symptoms starting. So 30 is probably not a good idea. I reckon anybody over 21 should lockdown for 12 months, and not leave their abode even once.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How would you feel if the current restrictions were relaxed but it came with an age restriction stating that only those under 30 could go out?"

Sounds good, set it up

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *essie.Woman
over a year ago

Serendipity

It wouldn’t work. There’s still nothing open so they’re allowed out to do what?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Can people stop attacking others and stop posting ranty angry sweary posts...both are not allowed on the forum.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abs..Woman
over a year ago

..

Young people are being affected and dying so I’m not clear on how that would help really.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

It has been discussed in the media, ie letting out certain age groups out of the lock down first, I don't know why people were giving the OP a hard time, it is just a question

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo


"Young people are being affected and dying so I’m not clear on how that would help really. "

God knows how they are going to do it. If I was under 30 and they said you can go out now I would feel like a lamb to the slaughter because no one ones which of us are going to get it bad, whatever the age

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etro1940sCouple
over a year ago

Kingston upon Thames


"I'm good with following robust evidence to make policy decisions.

I'm not sure we have it for such a decision. Younger people, as typically socially active and gregarious, could be the perfect vector to spread the virus both amongst each other, babies and the elderly.

Many people across age groups show minimal symptoms and there's a lag from getting it, to when symptoms, if any, show up.

I'd not rush to consider this group for early release. "

Totally agree with OP. This will need to be an "evidence based" medical/science decision by government. Forget the politics, anyone in key jobs must be having a horrid time. Don't envy them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abs..Woman
over a year ago

..


"Young people are being affected and dying so I’m not clear on how that would help really.

God knows how they are going to do it. If I was under 30 and they said you can go out now I would feel like a lamb to the slaughter because no one ones which of us are going to get it bad, whatever the age "

I agree with you. Whichever way they choose it will come with its own risks but who would want to go and test the water?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

Be interesting to get some data from Sweden to see how it’s working out there.

Problems is some of our under 30’s may not be as socially responsible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Young people are being affected and dying so I’m not clear on how that would help really.

God knows how they are going to do it. If I was under 30 and they said you can go out now I would feel like a lamb to the slaughter because no one ones which of us are going to get it bad, whatever the age

I agree with you. Whichever way they choose it will come with its own risks but who would want to go and test the water? "

I volunteer as tribute

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abs..Woman
over a year ago

..


"Young people are being affected and dying so I’m not clear on how that would help really.

God knows how they are going to do it. If I was under 30 and they said you can go out now I would feel like a lamb to the slaughter because no one ones which of us are going to get it bad, whatever the age

I agree with you. Whichever way they choose it will come with its own risks but who would want to go and test the water?

I volunteer as tribute "

Perfect. I send an email to the powers that be

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So only under 30s can go out.

Who is going to check my age everywhere I go?

And what about the fake i.d. I'm carrying.

Unworkable. Nonsense

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itonmyfacebookMan
over a year ago

Burton on Trent


"How would you feel if the current restrictions were relaxed but it came with an age restriction stating that only those under 30 could go out?"

They're now saying that this age group are going to be the first to return to work.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Hopefully lockdown lifts will be based on symptom tracking, temperature tests and antibody tests.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeBee67Man
over a year ago

Masked and Distant


"How would you feel if the current restrictions were relaxed but it came with an age restriction stating that only those under 30 could go out?

They're now saying that this age group are going to be the first to return to work. "

I'm still at work, and definitely not under 30.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeBee67Man
over a year ago

Masked and Distant


"Hopefully lockdown lifts will be based on symptom tracking, temperature tests and antibody tests."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itonmyfacebookMan
over a year ago

Burton on Trent


"How would you feel if the current restrictions were relaxed but it came with an age restriction stating that only those under 30 could go out?

They're now saying that this age group are going to be the first to return to work.

I'm still at work, and definitely not under 30."

Same here my dear. Busier than ever. But I've heard it said that there's some who aren't.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I’m the Independent, Professor Neil Ferguson has been quotes as saying restrictions will probably be relaxed by age group and geography.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uietlykinkymeWoman
over a year ago

kinky land

Well they'll have to release us from lockdown somehow We can't just hide for a year.

Here's hoping the antibody tests work and are widely available soon

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uttyjonnMan
over a year ago

SEA


"Well they'll have to release us from lockdown somehow We can't just hide for a year.

Here's hoping the antibody tests work and are widely available soon "

Although they would be great to have they wont test us all for having had it. If the virus doesn't burn itself out (which I doubt) they will need to start letting us out eventually. Maybe low risk people first. I hope so as I have no income at the moment

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire

The biggest problem with transferring a theoretical paper plan into reality is people.

We've already seen people interpreting rules to suit themselves, arguing vehemently that the rules are wrong and that they know best and coming up.with ever increasingly weird conspiracy theories.

I don't really see a controlled and phased return to normality working in the real world.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Apparently men are more susceptible to the more serious illness than women....should we lock you all up longer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How would you feel if the current restrictions were relaxed but it came with an age restriction stating that only those under 30 could go out?"

its only ok if they go out and stay out

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire


"Apparently men are more susceptible to the more serious illness than women....should we lock you all up longer "

Perhaps you women will believe us about man flu now....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Apparently men are more susceptible to the more serious illness than women....should we lock you all up longer

Perhaps you women will believe us about man flu now.... "

That was my first thought when I heard it ....i thought oh noooo here we go lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I just read tabloid articles about a 28 year old bloke, and 29 year old woman, both with no underlying health conditions who died within days of their symptoms starting. So 30 is probably not a good idea. I reckon anybody over 21 should lockdown for 12 months, and not leave their abode even once. "

That should read no known underlying health conditions. People aren’t being autopsied so no one can know for sure. People go into hospital for routine checks and find out they have weeks to live. Unless they start doing proper autopsies on those who apparently have no underlying health issues, it’s safe to assume there is a good chance they may have had one and not known.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I wouldn’t change what I’m doing even though I’m under 30.

There’s people under 30 who have died.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itonmyfacebookMan
over a year ago

Burton on Trent


"I wouldn’t change what I’m doing even though I’m under 30.

There’s people under 30 who have died. "

What about if they decide that under 30s should return to work?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"I just read tabloid articles about a 28 year old bloke, and 29 year old woman, both with no underlying health conditions who died within days of their symptoms starting. So 30 is probably not a good idea. I reckon anybody over 21 should lockdown for 12 months, and not leave their abode even once.

That should read no known underlying health conditions. People aren’t being autopsied so no one can know for sure. People go into hospital for routine checks and find out they have weeks to live. Unless they start doing proper autopsies on those who apparently have no underlying health issues, it’s safe to assume there is a good chance they may have had one and not known."

This is correct. There was a 21yo initially reported as having died of Covid-19 and no health conditions. Diagnosis at the point of reporting was based on symptoms. At PM, it was found a) she did not have Covid-19 and b) she died of a heart attack. She'd had a cough prior to her death - heart failure or malfunction causes a cough, due to the fluid that accumulates in the lungs as a result. But her GP would not have thought to check a "healthy" 21yo with a persistent cough for heart problems. I do wonder if the poor young lad of 13 who died might also have had undiagnosed heart problems.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wouldn’t change what I’m doing even though I’m under 30.

There’s people under 30 who have died.

What about if they decide that under 30s should return to work? "

I’m self employed. I’d rather risk my income than my health or the health of my loved ones like my 92 year old grandmother who I collect medicine for & usually take shopping before all of this!

Not worth the risk in my opinion. Although many under 30s won’t be considered “high risk” if the get the virus, loves ones may, like parents and grandparents.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itonmyfacebookMan
over a year ago

Burton on Trent


"I wouldn’t change what I’m doing even though I’m under 30.

There’s people under 30 who have died.

What about if they decide that under 30s should return to work?

I’m self employed. I’d rather risk my income than my health or the health of my loved ones like my 92 year old grandmother who I collect medicine for & usually take shopping before all of this!

Not worth the risk in my opinion. Although many under 30s won’t be considered “high risk” if the get the virus, loves ones may, like parents and grandparents. "

Okay. I didn't know if you were actually off or not when I asked, did I. Imo it's going to be around for a while. Hence the least vulnerable; the young coming out of the lockdown first is something the politicians will consider.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wouldn’t change what I’m doing even though I’m under 30.

There’s people under 30 who have died.

What about if they decide that under 30s should return to work?

I’m self employed. I’d rather risk my income than my health or the health of my loved ones like my 92 year old grandmother who I collect medicine for & usually take shopping before all of this!

Not worth the risk in my opinion. Although many under 30s won’t be considered “high risk” if the get the virus, loves ones may, like parents and grandparents.

Okay. I didn't know if you were actually off or not when I asked, did I. Imo it's going to be around for a while. Hence the least vulnerable; the young coming out of the lockdown first is something the politicians will consider. "

They may well consider it.

Whether they implement it or not is another story.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *itonmyfacebookMan
over a year ago

Burton on Trent


"I wouldn’t change what I’m doing even though I’m under 30.

There’s people under 30 who have died.

What about if they decide that under 30s should return to work?

I’m self employed. I’d rather risk my income than my health or the health of my loved ones like my 92 year old grandmother who I collect medicine for & usually take shopping before all of this!

Not worth the risk in my opinion. Although many under 30s won’t be considered “high risk” if the get the virus, loves ones may, like parents and grandparents.

Okay. I didn't know if you were actually off or not when I asked, did I. Imo it's going to be around for a while. Hence the least vulnerable; the young coming out of the lockdown first is something the politicians will consider.

They may well consider it.

Whether they implement it or not is another story. "

Sure. Have to wait and see, won't we. I only posted on here because I heard it on R4 this morning on my way to work.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top