Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many women who are into the sub lifestyle are there on fab? Is it common?" not many at all they mostly like dom men | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many women who are into the sub lifestyle are there on fab? Is it common?" Define lifestyle Ms Icebreaker | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’m submissive (with some pesky brat tendencies) and I think there’s quite a few BDSM fabbers. I’d recommend an advanced search by interest “SM” to narrow down your kinkster search " I'm not particularly sadistic in that sense however. Also, girl you're thiccer than a bowl of oatmeal! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many women who are into the sub lifestyle are there on fab? Is it common?" im a pure sub and always do what im told | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Suzie is sub and collared." I ware my collar with pride | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Suzie is a sub and has been collared 12 years. " Nice x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many women who are into the sub lifestyle are there on fab? Is it common? not many at all they mostly like dom men " Hmmm, I much prefer sub men | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many women who are into the sub lifestyle are there on fab? Is it common? not many at all they mostly like dom men Hmmm, I much prefer sub men " Nothing wrong with that... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I've been lucky enough to meet a couple of beautiful submissive girls on here and actually much prefer this site to any other due to ease of use,search,verifications etc. I do despair of some of the so called Doms here who obviously don't have a clue how to build a strong and lasting relationship with submissive girls! As someone stated earlier it's not black and white and the submissive has to be a willing participant and this usually takes time to establish as trust has to be built to get the best?" Agreed... true sub girls know what the are after and my try one of these newly appointed Doms... they soon know that most are false and then will look for an establish Dom... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I've been lucky enough to meet a couple of beautiful submissive girls on here and actually much prefer this site to any other due to ease of use,search,verifications etc. I do despair of some of the so called Doms here who obviously don't have a clue how to build a strong and lasting relationship with submissive girls! As someone stated earlier it's not black and white and the submissive has to be a willing participant and this usually takes time to establish as trust has to be built to get the best? Agreed... true sub girls know what the are after and my try one of these newly appointed Doms... they soon know that most are false and then will look for an establish Dom... " With respect I dislike the phrase "true sub", I have heard too many stories of people being told they are not "true subs" because they did not meet the dom's requirements. The issue was that it was the wrong dom for the sub. Although we largely go by our own experience (although reading and listening to others is helpful), most new subs I have met did not really know what they wanted. It generally took time and experience to find what they wanted. Possibly exchanging "true" with "experienced" would be more apt. Also a number of new subs stick to bad situations as they don't want to feel they failed in their submission. It is also what makes some subs take on too much intensity in not wanting to let the dom down. Generally it is speaking to other subs makes them realise that the dom is wrong for them. This why subsisters munches and subs' contributions to forums are so important. I know with this next point I am a lone wolf on Fab, but as someone who for a long time did not have a sub and therefore was involved in casual play I will still state it. Yes trust is important, but just because the play is casual or occaisional does not mean it cannot be deep or meaningful. It is like those who say the best sex is with a loving committed partner. Yes it can be great and deep, but people have had mind blowing soul shaking sex with one night stands. Likewise with kink, the longevity of the relationship is no guarantee of the quality of the kink. So it comes down to the often repeated comment, except with the absence of abuse, and only with consent, there is no one way to do kink. BDSM covers a multitude of types of play and there is no one true way. There is only what works for those involved. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’m the very proud owner of a gorge submissive f/b who wears my collar x I’ve also met many willing submissives from this site x" Thats very nice ,i wish much to be someone sub | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am not sure there is a submissive lifestyle. People can have submissive tendencies which are individual to them and each submissive is different and may express their submission differently with each dom/me. Whereas, I would suggest swinging is a lifestyle because it is a broadly generic activity." It's a lifestyle if they want a D/s relationship. I'm not submissive per se, but am sexually. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I've been lucky enough to meet a couple of beautiful submissive girls on here and actually much prefer this site to any other due to ease of use,search,verifications etc. I do despair of some of the so called Doms here who obviously don't have a clue how to build a strong and lasting relationship with submissive girls! As someone stated earlier it's not black and white and the submissive has to be a willing participant and this usually takes time to establish as trust has to be built to get the best? Agreed... true sub girls know what the are after and my try one of these newly appointed Doms... they soon know that most are false and then will look for an establish Dom... With respect I dislike the phrase "true sub", I have heard too many stories of people being told they are not "true subs" because they did not meet the dom's requirements. The issue was that it was the wrong dom for the sub. Although we largely go by our own experience (although reading and listening to others is helpful), most new subs I have met did not really know what they wanted. It generally took time and experience to find what they wanted. Possibly exchanging "true" with "experienced" would be more apt. Also a number of new subs stick to bad situations as they don't want to feel they failed in their submission. It is also what makes some subs take on too much intensity in not wanting to let the dom down. Generally it is speaking to other subs makes them realise that the dom is wrong for them. This why subsisters munches and subs' contributions to forums are so important. I know with this next point I am a lone wolf on Fab, but as someone who for a long time did not have a sub and therefore was involved in casual play I will still state it. Yes trust is important, but just because the play is casual or occaisional does not mean it cannot be deep or meaningful. It is like those who say the best sex is with a loving committed partner. Yes it can be great and deep, but people have had mind blowing soul shaking sex with one night stands. Likewise with kink, the longevity of the relationship is no guarantee of the quality of the kink. So it comes down to the often repeated comment, except with the absence of abuse, and only with consent, there is no one way to do kink. BDSM covers a multitude of types of play and there is no one true way. There is only what works for those involved. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I've been lucky enough to meet a couple of beautiful submissive girls on here and actually much prefer this site to any other due to ease of use,search,verifications etc. I do despair of some of the so called Doms here who obviously don't have a clue how to build a strong and lasting relationship with submissive girls! As someone stated earlier it's not black and white and the submissive has to be a willing participant and this usually takes time to establish as trust has to be built to get the best? Agreed... true sub girls know what the are after and my try one of these newly appointed Doms... they soon know that most are false and then will look for an establish Dom... " it frustrates me how naive and power hungry some who believe that they know what they are doing. Scooby | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"I like sub men but not sure that's the angle you were referring to" I would love to be your sub bitch | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I like sub men but not sure that's the angle you were referring to" Maybe start a thread about sub guys, I’ll definitely post | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am not sure there is a submissive lifestyle. People can have submissive tendencies which are individual to them and each submissive is different and may express their submission differently with each dom/me. Whereas, I would suggest swinging is a lifestyle because it is a broadly generic activity. It's a lifestyle if they want a D/s relationship. I'm not submissive per se, but am sexually. " I'm my(limited) experience I've come across a few sexually submissive girls who were completely opposite in daily life. Very much so! In fact they were extremely forceful! And certainly not to be messed with! However once in 'the zone' they were remarkable and had wonderfully wicked imaginative ideas of how to be'forced' into acts of submission... In fact the less submissive on the surface, the more submissive in the bedroom! Any others noticed this trait? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm sub but not common" I a pure sub but in normal life im a lady to, when im a sup I do everything im told | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am not sure there is a submissive lifestyle. People can have submissive tendencies which are individual to them and each submissive is different and may express their submission differently with each dom/me. Whereas, I would suggest swinging is a lifestyle because it is a broadly generic activity. It's a lifestyle if they want a D/s relationship. I'm not submissive per se, but am sexually. I'm my(limited) experience I've come across a few sexually submissive girls who were completely opposite in daily life. Very much so! In fact they were extremely forceful! And certainly not to be messed with! However once in 'the zone' they were remarkable and had wonderfully wicked imaginative ideas of how to be'forced' into acts of submission... In fact the less submissive on the surface, the more submissive in the bedroom! Any others noticed this trait?" My experience and is that submissives come from all walks of life, all genders, and both sexes. They also switch. It is my understanding that any of the aforesaid can be very imaginative in their "forced" submission in bed. I would like to suggest that the concentration on a limited stereotype of a sexually submissive woman prevents people (male and female) from exploring their own form of submission. D/S is about personal experience and not a competitive sport and it is/ can be far more than imaginative "forced" bed time activities. Which is of itself very much a stereotype of submissive women. However it is a broad church open to all consensual play. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm sub but not common I a pure sub but in normal life im a lady to, when im a sup I do everything im told" Good Girl | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am not sure there is a submissive lifestyle. People can have submissive tendencies which are individual to them and each submissive is different and may express their submission differently with each dom/me. Whereas, I would suggest swinging is a lifestyle because it is a broadly generic activity." There are people who live a D/s lifestyle. Personally I'm sexually submissive, whether I could live a D/s lifestyle with my Dom (where is he?), I don't know. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am not sure there is a submissive lifestyle. People can have submissive tendencies which are individual to them and each submissive is different and may express their submission differently with each dom/me. Whereas, I would suggest swinging is a lifestyle because it is a broadly generic activity. There are people who live a D/s lifestyle. Personally I'm sexually submissive, whether I could live a D/s lifestyle with my Dom (where is he?), I don't know. " Hi My response was in relation to OP's initial comment, which seemed to suggest a common submissive lifestyle, whereas as you have pointed out (with which I agree) a submissive lifestyle would generally be within an individual D/S lifestyle relationship. Many people successfully maintain a D/S lifedtyle relationship. I am a bit of a purist who sees sex and kink as largely seperate with a small area of overlap. Modern sexual submission (of itself) as a kink is not my thing. However, I know sexual submission is a majority interest on Fab and in the swinging community, so who knows you may meet the right Dom for you on here. I met my sub and g/f on here you may be lucky too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am not sure there is a submissive lifestyle. People can have submissive tendencies which are individual to them and each submissive is different and may express their submission differently with each dom/me. Whereas, I would suggest swinging is a lifestyle because it is a broadly generic activity. There are people who live a D/s lifestyle. Personally I'm sexually submissive, whether I could live a D/s lifestyle with my Dom (where is he?), I don't know. Hi My response was in relation to OP's initial comment, which seemed to suggest a common submissive lifestyle, whereas as you have pointed out (with which I agree) a submissive lifestyle would generally be within an individual D/S lifestyle relationship. Many people successfully maintain a D/S lifedtyle relationship. I am a bit of a purist who sees sex and kink as largely seperate with a small area of overlap. Modern sexual submission (of itself) as a kink is not my thing. However, I know sexual submission is a majority interest on Fab and in the swinging community, so who knows you may meet the right Dom for you on here. I met my sub and g/f on here you may be lucky too. " I did meet someone I fell for last year. Unfortunately, although I was happy to accept an open relationship and knew about the random women and couples, I wasn't aware of other girlfriends (this year). The aspect of selective honesty devalued me. I will probably struggle to trust... Walls are up again. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It's almost universal amongst FAB women. Which sucks when you find sub women dull and boring like we do " May I ask why do you find them boring? Genuinely interested | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"May I ask why do you find them boring? Genuinely interested " Sure It's just a bit of a cliche. And shows no imagination, or willing to take the domme role. It's like women sleepwalk into it. It's also often tied into low self esteem, which is a turn-off. Conversely - confidence to be a hot domme is a massive turn on. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"May I ask why do you find them boring? Genuinely interested Sure It's just a bit of a cliche. And shows no imagination, or willing to take the domme role. It's like women sleepwalk into it. It's also often tied into low self esteem, which is a turn-off. Conversely - confidence to be a hot domme is a massive turn on." That's really interesting, thank you Can see how the confidence of a domme is hot as | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"*cracks whip*" Yikes love a good beating though the caning is my current thing | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"May I ask why do you find them boring? Genuinely interested Sure It's just a bit of a cliche. And shows no imagination, or willing to take the domme role. It's like women sleepwalk into it. It's also often tied into low self esteem, which is a turn-off. Conversely - confidence to be a hot domme is a massive turn on." What a generalisation! It depends on the sub's character. I can switch and have when I meet a sap of a Dom (a wannabe who reckons he just needs to bark out orders without any sense of authority). In fact for me to be truly submissive, someone has to press my buttons... Otherwise I might turn bratty. I would not be submissive if feeling vulnerable. Trust has its place. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"May I ask why do you find them boring? Genuinely interested Sure It's just a bit of a cliche. And shows no imagination, or willing to take the domme role. It's like women sleepwalk into it. It's also often tied into low self esteem, which is a turn-off. Conversely - confidence to be a hot domme is a massive turn on." You are entitled to your opinion, but your reasoning leaves something to be desired. It seems to be inaccurate, and it is not evidence based. I have the following problems with the reasons presented. Firstly the statement that submission is often tied to low self esteem is unproven, it is a statement plucked out of the air. I could conversely say that "dommes are damaged women with grudges against men". Yes, there are some who are like that, but most are expressing their kinky nature. Likewise submissive women are expressing their own kinky nature. Secondly the reasoning has a false value system built into it, as if being a domme is better than being a submissive. It is a statement almost as incredulous as those men who are doms who think they are in some way superior to submissive men. In both cases there is no such value. It is just people expressing themselves. I also have diffilculty with the tacit assumption that submission is an easy default setting. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What a generalisation! It depends on the sub's character. I can switch and have when I meet a sap of a Dom (a wannabe who reckons he just needs to bark out orders without any sense of authority). In fact for me to be truly submissive, someone has to press my buttons... Otherwise I might turn bratty. I would not be submissive if feeling vulnerable. Trust has its place. " We're happy to generalise as we just don't fancy these types. Other people do, and that's fine. But it's a no from us. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You are entitled to your opinion, but your reasoning leaves something to be desired. It seems to be inaccurate, and it is not evidence based. I have the following problems with the reasons presented. Firstly the statement that submission is often tied to low self esteem is unproven, it is a statement plucked out of the air. I could conversely say that "dommes are damaged women with grudges against men". Yes, there are some who are like that, but most are expressing their kinky nature. Likewise submissive women are expressing their own kinky nature. Secondly the reasoning has a false value system built into it, as if being a domme is better than being a submissive. It is a statement almost as incredulous as those men who are doms who think they are in some way superior to submissive men. In both cases there is no such value. It is just people expressing themselves. I also have diffilculty with the tacit assumption that submission is an easy default setting. " Our views are evidence based. The evidence being meeting hundreds of people within the swinging scene over the past five years. Since somebody asked, we'll explain our reasoning. Virtually all sub women we've met have been a certain type, lacking in confidence, a certain body type. They get their confidence back (in their own words) by sleeping with multiple guys. And that's absolutely fine. It's their life, their choice. We don't berate them for it. But it's unappealing for us. So as a rule now we proactively block women on FAB with "sub" or "bratty" type profiles, or certain body types, as they are guaranteed to be of zero interest to us. That aside we wish them all the best in their journeys | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Secondly the reasoning has a false value system built into it, as if being a domme is better than being a submissive. " It's not false value. We place great value in a domme female, and zero value in a sub female. That's our preference. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What a generalisation! It depends on the sub's character. I can switch and have when I meet a sap of a Dom (a wannabe who reckons he just needs to bark out orders without any sense of authority). In fact for me to be truly submissive, someone has to press my buttons... Otherwise I might turn bratty. I would not be submissive if feeling vulnerable. Trust has its place. We're happy to generalise as we just don't fancy these types. Other people do, and that's fine. But it's a no from us." You're entitled to your opinion. However, your given rationale was poor and needed addressing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Secondly the reasoning has a false value system built into it, as if being a domme is better than being a submissive. It's not false value. We place great value in a domme female, and zero value in a sub female. That's our preference." It's a judgement you've made in relation to yourselves, and are entitled to it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You are entitled to your opinion, but your reasoning leaves something to be desired. It seems to be inaccurate, and it is not evidence based. I have the following problems with the reasons presented. Firstly the statement that submission is often tied to low self esteem is unproven, it is a statement plucked out of the air. I could conversely say that "dommes are damaged women with grudges against men". Yes, there are some who are like that, but most are expressing their kinky nature. Likewise submissive women are expressing their own kinky nature. Secondly the reasoning has a false value system built into it, as if being a domme is better than being a submissive. It is a statement almost as incredulous as those men who are doms who think they are in some way superior to submissive men. In both cases there is no such value. It is just people expressing themselves. I also have diffilculty with the tacit assumption that submission is an easy default setting. Our views are evidence based. The evidence being meeting hundreds of people within the swinging scene over the past five years. Since somebody asked, we'll explain our reasoning. Virtually all sub women we've met have been a certain type, lacking in confidence, a certain body type. They get their confidence back (in their own words) by sleeping with multiple guys. And that's absolutely fine. It's their life, their choice. We don't berate them for it. But it's unappealing for us. So as a rule now we proactively block women on FAB with "sub" or "bratty" type profiles, or certain body types, as they are guaranteed to be of zero interest to us. That aside we wish them all the best in their journeys " That’s absolute rubbish! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That’s absolute rubbish! " It's our first hand experience. And our preference. Your opinion of it is irrelevant | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
". I'm my(limited) experience I've come across a few sexually submissive girls who were completely opposite in daily life. Very much so! In fact they were extremely forceful! And certainly not to be messed with! However once in 'the zone' they were remarkable and had wonderfully wicked imaginative ideas of how to be'forced' into acts of submission... In fact the less submissive on the surface, the more submissive in the bedroom! Any others noticed this trait?" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That’s absolute rubbish! It's our first hand experience. And our preference. Your opinion of it is irrelevant " It may be your experience, but it’s a sweeping generalisation and in my case it’s not true | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You are entitled to your opinion, but your reasoning leaves something to be desired. It seems to be inaccurate, and it is not evidence based. I have the following problems with the reasons presented. Firstly the statement that submission is often tied to low self esteem is unproven, it is a statement plucked out of the air. I could conversely say that "dommes are damaged women with grudges against men". Yes, there are some who are like that, but most are expressing their kinky nature. Likewise submissive women are expressing their own kinky nature. Secondly the reasoning has a false value system built into it, as if being a domme is better than being a submissive. It is a statement almost as incredulous as those men who are doms who think they are in some way superior to submissive men. In both cases there is no such value. It is just people expressing themselves. I also have diffilculty with the tacit assumption that submission is an easy default setting. Our views are evidence based. The evidence being meeting hundreds of people within the swinging scene over the past five years. Since somebody asked, we'll explain our reasoning. Virtually all sub women we've met have been a certain type, lacking in confidence, a certain body type. They get their confidence back (in their own words) by sleeping with multiple guys. And that's absolutely fine. It's their life, their choice. We don't berate them for it. But it's unappealing for us. So as a rule now we proactively block women on FAB with "sub" or "bratty" type profiles, or certain body types, as they are guaranteed to be of zero interest to us. That aside we wish them all the best in their journeys " What is this certain body type? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To put my opinion in to the mix. I have been on the BDSM scene for over 15 years and on the swinging scene for over 10, I have had the pleasure of meeting hundreds and hundreds of people (play or social) in that time. There is no correlation between submissives and low self-esteem, lack of imagination or motivation. Admittedly, there are some submissives that do suffer from those traits just like there are some Dominants that suffer from those. Domination and submission are character traits, just like a sense of humour or being sporty are character traits - they do not define the person but they are part of who they are. As such just because you are one thing does not mean you are something else. Now everyone is entitled to their opinion and I respect that, but sweeping generalisations don’t do anyone any favours. " This about sums it up - the assertion that submissives (men or women) lack self-esteem or confidence is a sweeping generalisation borne out of cod psychology at best - in fact it could just as easily be argued that a submissive person needs both self-esteem and confidence to be able to give themselves in the first place - being able to recognise their needs and desires does not come from a place of low self-esteem at all, but one of knowing themselves and what they want. Sure there are *some* out there who have read *those* books or who have been bullied into thinking they are submissive and just as there are bullying dominants who don't truly understand BDSM, there are submissives who go into it blindly too, but to apply that to the majority is as several have said a sweeping generalisation. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To put my opinion in to the mix. I have been on the BDSM scene for over 15 years and on the swinging scene for over 10, I have had the pleasure of meeting hundreds and hundreds of people (play or social) in that time. There is no correlation between submissives and low self-esteem, lack of imagination or motivation. Admittedly, there are some submissives that do suffer from those traits just like there are some Dominants that suffer from those. Domination and submission are character traits, just like a sense of humour or being sporty are character traits - they do not define the person but they are part of who they are. As such just because you are one thing does not mean you are something else. Now everyone is entitled to their opinion and I respect that, but sweeping generalisations don’t do anyone any favours. This about sums it up - the assertion that submissives (men or women) lack self-esteem or confidence is a sweeping generalisation borne out of cod psychology at best - in fact it could just as easily be argued that a submissive person needs both self-esteem and confidence to be able to give themselves in the first place - being able to recognise their needs and desires does not come from a place of low self-esteem at all, but one of knowing themselves and what they want. Sure there are *some* out there who have read *those* books or who have been bullied into thinking they are submissive and just as there are bullying dominants who don't truly understand BDSM, there are submissives who go into it blindly too, but to apply that to the majority is as several have said a sweeping generalisation." Never met a submissive lady who is not dominant in her work place, her sexual submissiveness is a a release/juxtaposition from the domestic world. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Never met a submissive lady who is not dominant in her work place, her sexual submissiveness is a a release/juxtaposition from the domestic world." To be honest I think that's also something of a generalisation at the other end of the scale and one that is often bandied about about submissives - and again there probably are *some* for whom that holds true, but I also don't think it can be applied quite so liberally. Both dominance and submission can be quite innate things and may even vary from interaction to interaction in some cases - I know, as a submissive, I don't "feel" submissive to everyone I come across and in fact wouldn't just give myself to anyone that said they were dominant either - truth be told there have been a handful of people I've encountered who I have truly "felt" submissive to in all the time I have held an interest in that side of my sexuality. So I don't think it can necessarily be defined in such simple terms as have been expressed on this thread - although we each have our own reasons for our interests and our positions within the lifestyle of course. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Never met a submissive lady who is not dominant in her work place, her sexual submissiveness is a a release/juxtaposition from the domestic world. To be honest I think that's also something of a generalisation at the other end of the scale and one that is often bandied about about submissives - and again there probably are *some* for whom that holds true, but I also don't think it can be applied quite so liberally. Both dominance and submission can be quite innate things and may even vary from interaction to interaction in some cases - I know, as a submissive, I don't "feel" submissive to everyone I come across and in fact wouldn't just give myself to anyone that said they were dominant either - truth be told there have been a handful of people I've encountered who I have truly "felt" submissive to in all the time I have held an interest in that side of my sexuality. So I don't think it can necessarily be defined in such simple terms as have been expressed on this thread - although we each have our own reasons for our interests and our positions within the lifestyle of course." Not a generalisation from my experience, just happens to be a fact. Perhaps it’s a sapiosexual thing you haven’t experienced? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Not a generalisation from my experience, just happens to be a fact. Perhaps it’s a sapiosexual thing you haven’t experienced?" A "fact" based on your experience, just as in mine I've not come across it in as widespread a way as you would suggest - nothing to do with sapiosexual just different experiences and encounters. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Not a generalisation from my experience, just happens to be a fact. Perhaps it’s a sapiosexual thing you haven’t experienced? A "fact" based on your experience, just as in mine I've not come across it in as widespread a way as you would suggest - nothing to do with sapiosexual just different experiences and encounters." Plus possibly generalisation and projection? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The problem you may face OP is with demonstrating your dominant side sufficiently in your profile to interest a submissive lady - you've not asked for profile advice so I can't comment specifically on your profile but generically it's one thing *saying* you are dominant, quite another getting across in text form that you are enough to attract them. A lot of women will be wary of "Doms" that have read those books or seen BDSM porn and think it's all about telling the submissive what to do and them "obeying" so try and get across your experience and interests somehow" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What concerns me massively is the number of men on here who think it’s ok to send graphic descriptions of how they want to dominate in their opening message. Demonstrating a total lack of understanding of consent, very concerning, god knows how risky they’d be in real life. Boundaries and limits have to be very carefully negotiated. So many assuming that women want to be dominated, most women don’t. Part of the reason i stopped accepting messages from men. Even though I’m generally dominant I wouldn’t dream of sending an explicit message about this unless I had checked it out first. So in answer to OPs question - it’s simplistic to assume the only subs out there are women and check your dominant advances are wanted before you make them. " I always say, talk to Submissive never talk to to Doms if you are exploring, you will find the truth with no testosterone. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Never met a submissive lady who is not dominant in her work place, her sexual submissiveness is a a release/juxtaposition from the domestic world. To be honest I think that's also something of a generalisation at the other end of the scale and one that is often bandied about about submissives - and again there probably are *some* for whom that holds true, but I also don't think it can be applied quite so liberally. Both dominance and submission can be quite innate things and may even vary from interaction to interaction in some cases - I know, as a submissive, I don't "feel" submissive to everyone I come across and in fact wouldn't just give myself to anyone that said they were dominant either - truth be told there have been a handful of people I've encountered who I have truly "felt" submissive to in all the time I have held an interest in that side of my sexuality. So I don't think it can necessarily be defined in such simple terms as have been expressed on this thread - although we each have our own reasons for our interests and our positions within the lifestyle of course. Not a generalisation from my experience, just happens to be a fact. Perhaps it’s a sapiosexual thing you haven’t experienced?" As you said ‘in your experience’ That doesn’t mean it is everyone’s experience, it certainly is not mine, and we definitely have a sapiosexual connection too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm a switch " Snap! Me too! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What concerns me massively is the number of men on here who think it’s ok to send graphic descriptions of how they want to dominate in their opening message. Demonstrating a total lack of understanding of consent, very concerning, god knows how risky they’d be in real life. Boundaries and limits have to be very carefully negotiated. So many assuming that women want to be dominated, most women don’t. Part of the reason i stopped accepting messages from men. Even though I’m generally dominant I wouldn’t dream of sending an explicit message about this unless I had checked it out first. So in answer to OPs question - it’s simplistic to assume the only subs out there are women and check your dominant advances are wanted before you make them. " Exactly what I was going to say. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many women who are into the sub lifestyle are there on fab? Is it common?" I'm generally into subs, male or female. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You may be better of on a kink site, rather than a swinging one. " Tbh, there really aren't suitable kink sites for this, I'm definitely not a swinger but this is the best place to meet potential subs that I've found. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Thirty seven." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many women who are into the sub lifestyle are there on fab? Is it common? I'm generally into subs, male or female." Site needs more Pickygirls x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In my opinion as a submissive of many years; A true Dominant understands that the submissive actually holds the power. One word or sign and it all stops. Submission is a gift that can be taken away in a heartbeat. Any ‘Dominant’ who ignores that is really just a bully or a control freak who probably watched 50 shades. " I agree 100%. I've lost count over the years of the amount of new subs ruined by so called Dom's who saw them as nothing more than somebody weak to be used. New subs should talk to as many subs and Dom's to get an understanding of what to look for and understand the power lies within them. To give submission to somebody takes greater strength than taking it, but taking the submission takes greater responsibility. It is my job to respect it, stretch it a little then return it unharmed. After all, without a sub I am just a bloke with a collection of whips | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In my opinion as a submissive of many years; A true Dominant understands that the submissive actually holds the power. One word or sign and it all stops. Submission is a gift that can be taken away in a heartbeat. Any ‘Dominant’ who ignores that is really just a bully or a control freak who probably watched 50 shades. " I agree 100%. I've lost count over the years of the amount of new subs ruined by so called Dom's who saw them as nothing more than somebody weak to be used. New subs should talk to as many subs and Dom's to get an understanding of what to look for and understand the power lies within them. To give submission to somebody takes greater strength than taking it, but taking the submission takes greater responsibility. It is my job to respect it, stretch it a little then return it unharmed. After all, without a sub I am just a bloke with a collection of whips | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In my opinion as a submissive of many years; A true Dominant understands that the submissive actually holds the power. One word or sign and it all stops. Submission is a gift that can be taken away in a heartbeat. Any ‘Dominant’ who ignores that is really just a bully or a control freak who probably watched 50 shades. I agree 100%. I've lost count over the years of the amount of new subs ruined by so called Dom's who saw them as nothing more than somebody weak to be used. New subs should talk to as many subs and Dom's to get an understanding of what to look for and understand the power lies within them. To give submission to somebody takes greater strength than taking it, but taking the submission takes greater responsibility. It is my job to respect it, stretch it a little then return it unharmed. After all, without a sub I am just a bloke with a collection of whips" Although I largely agree with the sentiments expressed in both the original comment and the response, I disagree with a number of significant points. I disagree that submission is a gift. There is no obligation to return gift, whereas submission is always revocable. I prefer to see submission as something valuable exchanged for equally valuable domination. I also disagree about anyone being a "true" whatever in the scene. There only people that work for you. People you don't like may be good for someone else. Personally I don't think subs have all the power. I have stopped scenes where I have felt the submissive had had enough even though the submissives would have liked to have continued. Control of ones body is not control of a relationship. I think it is wrong to see the sub and dominant relationship as adversarial. Any one with a fetish genuinely wants to express it. A submissive craves to express their submission with the right dom in the right circumstances. An analogy would be sex, some take the view that women are here on Fab avoiding men (or women) and therefore they have control. But actually many are looking for the right relationship with sex and are keen to progress (whether casual or long term) with the right man (or woman). But with so many women complaining they can't find the right partner what control do they really have? Additionally I don't see it as the dominants responsibility to go beyond what has been agreed and negotiated. If the submissive wants stretching all well and good but if it has not been discussed I am not sure it is for the dominant to impose their view. My aim is, where my interests and the submissives interest intersect, to either help the submissive achieve their fantasy, and or if they wish, allow them to explore those matters that interest them and interest me. Then we have happy days. However as D/S is a broad church different D/S relationships have different approaches. Provided it is consensual people should fill your boots. The main thing is to ensure submissives have the tools that enable them to avoid, as far as is possible, physically and mentally damaging situations. One last point, in the same way that a submissive can be a submissive without a dominant, a dominant can be a dominant without a submissive. I am actually more than just a man with whips (which I have a few) as I practice tegularly with my whips, read whip books and articles and watch whip videos in order to achieve a proficient skill level, but enables me to give that stingy satisfaction to those who want it in play, for both our pleasure. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No. My former Dom had me here seeking other subs. Plenty of posers, very few genuinely submissive women. " I am curious to know what constituted a poser and why they were not genuinely submissive women? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say im a sub on my profile. I also say that even tho i am thst is not how a meet will go. Infact i I would never arrange a meet around thst basis and im usualy the " go getter" at meets haha It takes time for that to build up. I always avoid the people who tell me they are " dom" i always ask back whst being don means to them. Nearly all will say along the lines of..telling you what to do..using you..fucking you how i like..ordering you.. thats when you know they clueless really. For me D/s is so much more than that answer. Its not something i seek on here and have never " shopped around " for one either. The few times ive been in a d/s relationship its never been becasue im insecure, body conscious, low self estem or anything such like. Its because im strong and confident enough to be able to submit. It should never been mistaken for a sign of weekness but one of strength. But for me thats only ever possible with the right guy who becomes that dom. I can never really find a way to expalin wbat the relationship if dom/sub means to me but it dosnt seem to be the same as alot of peoples these days. I think its where the scene and lifestyle are mixed up? Truth is when you meet a perfect Dom..when he locks me in ( collar so forth) hes actually setting me free. " We are alike in finding our submission is liberating. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"May I ask why do you find them boring? Genuinely interested Sure It's just a bit of a cliche. And shows no imagination, or willing to take the domme role. It's like women sleepwalk into it. It's also often tied into low self esteem, which is a turn-off. Conversely - confidence to be a hot domme is a massive turn on. What a generalisation! It depends on the sub's character. I can switch and have when I meet a sap of a Dom (a wannabe who reckons he just needs to bark out orders without any sense of authority). In fact for me to be truly submissive, someone has to press my buttons... Otherwise I might turn bratty. I would not be submissive if feeling vulnerable. Trust has its place. " I agree, if I’m allowed I turn bratty, or try and top from the bottom. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say im a sub on my profile. I also say that even tho i am thst is not how a meet will go. Infact i I would never arrange a meet around thst basis and im usualy the " go getter" at meets haha It takes time for that to build up. I always avoid the people who tell me they are " dom" i always ask back whst being don means to them. Nearly all will say along the lines of..telling you what to do..using you..fucking you how i like..ordering you.. thats when you know they clueless really. For me D/s is so much more than that answer. Its not something i seek on here and have never " shopped around " for one either. The few times ive been in a d/s relationship its never been becasue im insecure, body conscious, low self estem or anything such like. Its because im strong and confident enough to be able to submit. It should never been mistaken for a sign of weekness but one of strength. But for me thats only ever possible with the right guy who becomes that dom. I can never really find a way to expalin wbat the relationship if dom/sub means to me but it dosnt seem to be the same as alot of peoples these days. I think its where the scene and lifestyle are mixed up? Truth is when you meet a perfect Dom..when he locks me in ( collar so forth) hes actually setting me free. " I am in agreement, in my everyday life I’m in control in every aspect of my life I have to be confident and make decisions which impact others. Being sexually submissive is a huge release for me and Iys almost euphoric it’s much more than physical it’s a huge mental sexual need for me to submit and trust | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"May I ask why do you find them boring? Genuinely interested Sure It's just a bit of a cliche. And shows no imagination, or willing to take the domme role. It's like women sleepwalk into it." It does seem that's the case. I switch with my wife and past partners so I view it on both sides. As a Dom I spend a considerable amount of time considering a scene, I like to research equipment and purchase things that will be new and fun, and then plan out how to make it interesting and exciting for my wife. Now a submissive doesn't have to do any of that, it's about handing control to another so to be blunt it's far easier and in some respects is the lazier route, but also the unknown is exciting After years of being a Dom I'm exploring my submissive side so I know both sides of the story. I can definitely see the appeal of being submissive, it's the easiest choice. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Becky and I are D/s. Becky wears my day collar and a special collar on nights out. Being Dom to her submission doesn’t mean me doing what the hell I like to her with scant regard to her feelings or wishes. Her submission to me allows me the responsibility to care for her needs, whether it be just with me or with partners that we choose or I may choose for her. It’s my role to ensure she’s safe and cared for while helping her reach whatever subspace she wants to be in. It’s far from just flogging and restraints. The strongest tie is the one between us. She trusts me completely. Now, that being said, Becky can sometimes be bratty or a bit switchy, it’s my place to make sure she is happy. Many people will have their own idea about dominance and submission and that’s their right. B&J x" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"May I ask why do you find them boring? Genuinely interested Sure It's just a bit of a cliche. And shows no imagination, or willing to take the domme role. It's like women sleepwalk into it. It does seem that's the case. I switch with my wife and past partners so I view it on both sides. As a Dom I spend a considerable amount of time considering a scene, I like to research equipment and purchase things that will be new and fun, and then plan out how to make it interesting and exciting for my wife. Now a submissive doesn't have to do any of that, it's about handing control to another so to be blunt it's far easier and in some respects is the lazier route, but also the unknown is exciting After years of being a Dom I'm exploring my submissive side so I know both sides of the story. I can definitely see the appeal of being submissive, it's the easiest choice." I do have a dominant side but it brings me no sexual pleasure. I also don't know how far I'd go into the S/M aspect. So for me submission is the safest choice and horniest - not the easiest. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Becky and I are D/s. Becky wears my day collar and a special collar on nights out. Being Dom to her submission doesn’t mean me doing what the hell I like to her with scant regard to her feelings or wishes. Her submission to me allows me the responsibility to care for her needs, whether it be just with me or with partners that we choose or I may choose for her. It’s my role to ensure she’s safe and cared for while helping her reach whatever subspace she wants to be in. It’s far from just flogging and restraints. The strongest tie is the one between us. She trusts me completely. Now, that being said, Becky can sometimes be bratty or a bit switchy, it’s my place to make sure she is happy. Many people will have their own idea about dominance and submission and that’s their right. B&J x" Like any aspect of a relationship you come to agreement what works for both of you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say im a sub on my profile. I also say that even tho i am thst is not how a meet will go. Infact i I would never arrange a meet around thst basis and im usualy the " go getter" at meets haha It takes time for that to build up. I always avoid the people who tell me they are " dom" i always ask back whst being don means to them. Nearly all will say along the lines of..telling you what to do..using you..fucking you how i like..ordering you.. thats when you know they clueless really. For me D/s is so much more than that answer. Its not something i seek on here and have never " shopped around " for one either. The few times ive been in a d/s relationship its never been becasue im insecure, body conscious, low self estem or anything such like. Its because im strong and confident enough to be able to submit. It should never been mistaken for a sign of weekness but one of strength. But for me thats only ever possible with the right guy who becomes that dom. I can never really find a way to expalin wbat the relationship if dom/sub means to me but it dosnt seem to be the same as alot of peoples these days. I think its where the scene and lifestyle are mixed up? Truth is when you meet a perfect Dom..when he locks me in ( collar so forth) hes actually setting me free. We are alike in finding our submission is liberating. " Glad someone else sees it like that too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say im a sub on my profile. I also say that even tho i am thst is not how a meet will go. Infact i I would never arrange a meet around thst basis and im usualy the " go getter" at meets haha It takes time for that to build up. I always avoid the people who tell me they are " dom" i always ask back whst being don means to them. Nearly all will say along the lines of..telling you what to do..using you..fucking you how i like..ordering you.. thats when you know they clueless really. For me D/s is so much more than that answer. Its not something i seek on here and have never " shopped around " for one either. The few times ive been in a d/s relationship its never been becasue im insecure, body conscious, low self estem or anything such like. Its because im strong and confident enough to be able to submit. It should never been mistaken for a sign of weekness but one of strength. But for me thats only ever possible with the right guy who becomes that dom. I can never really find a way to expalin wbat the relationship if dom/sub means to me but it dosnt seem to be the same as alot of peoples these days. I think its where the scene and lifestyle are mixed up? Truth is when you meet a perfect Dom..when he locks me in ( collar so forth) hes actually setting me free. I am in agreement, in my everyday life I’m in control in every aspect of my life I have to be confident and make decisions which impact others. Being sexually submissive is a huge release for me and Iys almost euphoric it’s much more than physical it’s a huge mental sexual need for me to submit and trust " So very true. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whilst I agree with the majority of what is being said on this thread, I am going to make an unpopular statement. Submissives do not have all the control. I’ll explain - it is a power exchange and within that there are safe words that stop everything. When the safe word is used a submissive can walk away from the dynamic at anytime for any reason. This stops the D/s, the power exchange finishes straight away. The common perception is that this gives the submissive total control, which is true to an extent. It is not just a submissive that can use a safe word and stop the dynamic, a Dominant can do this as well. Which makes it an equal power share - both people have the ability to change the dynamic. A submissive choose who to submit and can remove that submission at anytime. A Dominant chooses who to dominant and can remove that domination at anytime. It is one of the purest forms of power exchange and equality that I can think of. " Not an unpopular statement if you scroll up I have said a similar thing. I must say that overnight the quality of the contributions has been very impressive. I am also of the view that it takes strength to submit and submission in BDSM is not a sign of weakness. I think the problem is that on the swinging scene you run into women who say they are submissive of a certain dom, who controls who they sleep with and can make them sleep with whoever the dom wants. If you ask them what else the dom does (other than hitting their sexual buttons) in terms of support they normally come up blank. This is different from where the submissive is making a positive choice to give up that control within the context of a supportive D/S and it is a requirement of the sub that the dom takes that control. It is also different from the sub slut where sexual submission is there kink. Again they are not sleep walking into the situation, it is a positive choice. However for me although D/S can have some sexual context, it is not the main driver. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whilst I agree with the majority of what is being said on this thread, I am going to make an unpopular statement. Submissives do not have all the control. I’ll explain - it is a power exchange and within that there are safe words that stop everything. When the safe word is used a submissive can walk away from the dynamic at anytime for any reason. This stops the D/s, the power exchange finishes straight away. The common perception is that this gives the submissive total control, which is true to an extent. It is not just a submissive that can use a safe word and stop the dynamic, a Dominant can do this as well. Which makes it an equal power share - both people have the ability to change the dynamic. A submissive choose who to submit and can remove that submission at anytime. A Dominant chooses who to dominant and can remove that domination at anytime. It is one of the purest forms of power exchange and equality that I can think of. Not an unpopular statement if you scroll up I have said a similar thing. I must say that overnight the quality of the contributions has been very impressive. I am also of the view that it takes strength to submit and submission in BDSM is not a sign of weakness. I think the problem is that on the swinging scene you run into women who say they are submissive of a certain dom, who controls who they sleep with and can make them sleep with whoever the dom wants. If you ask them what else the dom does (other than hitting their sexual buttons) in terms of support they normally come up blank. This is different from where the submissive is making a positive choice to give up that control within the context of a supportive D/S and it is a requirement of the sub that the dom takes that control. It is also different from the sub slut where sexual submission is there kink. Again they are not sleep walking into the situation, it is a positive choice. However for me although D/S can have some sexual context, it is not the main driver." I think this being a swinging site and predominantly about sex a lot focus entirely on that. When actual D/s is a whole lpt more 1than just that. Some would argue that a lot of those things come with a good relationship which I guess they should but to me when a Dom or Domme offers that as part of a negotiation they are then held accountable even by themselves but for me that and D are the only people I answer to in that regard. My word and our contract is my bond and it is unwavering and she knows that 100% without any doubt. Not to say mistakes arn't made people are human but to know your partner will do everything in their power not to make them gives something more that isn't commonly shared in my experience. As you say both parties make a conscious decision and actually talk about it. Often assumed by others or taken for granted but not aired or agreed other than when they are standing at an alter or not atall. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Suzie is sub and collared." Cool! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say im a sub on my profile. I also say that even tho i am thst is not how a meet will go. Infact i I would never arrange a meet around thst basis and im usualy the " go getter" at meets haha It takes time for that to build up. I always avoid the people who tell me they are " dom" i always ask back whst being don means to them. Nearly all will say along the lines of..telling you what to do..using you..fucking you how i like..ordering you.. thats when you know they clueless really. For me D/s is so much more than that answer. Its not something i seek on here and have never " shopped around " for one either. The few times ive been in a d/s relationship its never been becasue im insecure, body conscious, low self estem or anything such like. Its because im strong and confident enough to be able to submit. It should never been mistaken for a sign of weekness but one of strength. But for me thats only ever possible with the right guy who becomes that dom. I can never really find a way to expalin wbat the relationship if dom/sub means to me but it dosnt seem to be the same as alot of peoples these days. I think its where the scene and lifestyle are mixed up? Truth is when you meet a perfect Dom..when he locks me in ( collar so forth) hes actually setting me free. We are alike in finding our submission is liberating. Glad someone else sees it like that too. " Perfect | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whilst I agree with the majority of what is being said on this thread, I am going to make an unpopular statement. Submissives do not have all the control. I’ll explain - it is a power exchange and within that there are safe words that stop everything. When the safe word is used a submissive can walk away from the dynamic at anytime for any reason. This stops the D/s, the power exchange finishes straight away. The common perception is that this gives the submissive total control, which is true to an extent. It is not just a submissive that can use a safe word and stop the dynamic, a Dominant can do this as well. Which makes it an equal power share - both people have the ability to change the dynamic. A submissive choose who to submit and can remove that submission at anytime. A Dominant chooses who to dominant and can remove that domination at anytime. It is one of the purest forms of power exchange and equality that I can think of. Not an unpopular statement if you scroll up I have said a similar thing. I must say that overnight the quality of the contributions has been very impressive. I am also of the view that it takes strength to submit and submission in BDSM is not a sign of weakness. I think the problem is that on the swinging scene you run into women who say they are submissive of a certain dom, who controls who they sleep with and can make them sleep with whoever the dom wants. If you ask them what else the dom does (other than hitting their sexual buttons) in terms of support they normally come up blank. This is different from where the submissive is making a positive choice to give up that control within the context of a supportive D/S and it is a requirement of the sub that the dom takes that control. It is also different from the sub slut where sexual submission is there kink. Again they are not sleep walking into the situation, it is a positive choice. However for me although D/S can have some sexual context, it is not the main driver." I’ve been on here years under many different guises and I always love and relate with your posts and knowledge | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am my Master's. However, that is separate to our play with other people on here x" That’s like saying I am my partners, but we swing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am my Master's. However, that is separate to our play with other people on here x That’s like saying I am my partners, but we swing. " Not really...sub isn't separate to being a partner but it is specific. We don't swing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I am my Master's. However, that is separate to our play with other people on here x That’s like saying I am my partners, but we swing. Not really...sub isn't separate to being a partner but it is specific. We don't swing." Ok sorry. So you a submissive but you have a separate dynamic without your SD relationship? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Have to say how refreshing it has been to have a BDSM related thread that has (mostly) stayed on track, been interesting and thought provoking in equal measure and avoided all the usual pitfalls " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The problem you may face OP is with demonstrating your dominant side sufficiently in your profile to interest a submissive lady - you've not asked for profile advice so I can't comment specifically on your profile but generically it's one thing *saying* you are dominant, quite another getting across in text form that you are enough to attract them. A lot of women will be wary of "Doms" that have read those books or seen BDSM porn and think it's all about telling the submissive what to do and them "obeying" so try and get across your experience and interests somehow" I had a nasty experience with a so called DOM once! Not good! I’m wary of these guys who have learnt it from that series of books!!!!!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I say im a sub on my profile. I also say that even tho i am thst is not how a meet will go. Infact i I would never arrange a meet around thst basis and im usualy the " go getter" at meets haha It takes time for that to build up. I always avoid the people who tell me they are " dom" i always ask back whst being don means to them. Nearly all will say along the lines of..telling you what to do..using you..fucking you how i like..ordering you.. thats when you know they clueless really. For me D/s is so much more than that answer. Its not something i seek on here and have never " shopped around " for one either. The few times ive been in a d/s relationship its never been becasue im insecure, body conscious, low self estem or anything such like. Its because im strong and confident enough to be able to submit. It should never been mistaken for a sign of weekness but one of strength. But for me thats only ever possible with the right guy who becomes that dom. I can never really find a way to expalin wbat the relationship if dom/sub means to me but it dosnt seem to be the same as alot of peoples these days. I think its where the scene and lifestyle are mixed up? Truth is when you meet a perfect Dom..when he locks me in ( collar so forth) hes actually setting me free. We are alike in finding our submission is liberating. Glad someone else sees it like that too. Perfect " Thanks. Nice to know its not lost on some people | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How many women who are into the sub lifestyle are there on fab? Is it common?" I was not aware the subway do a BDSM roll lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In my opinion as a submissive of many years; A true Dominant understands that the submissive actually holds the power. One word or sign and it all stops. Submission is a gift that can be taken away in a heartbeat. Any ‘Dominant’ who ignores that is really just a bully or a control freak who probably watched 50 shades. " This!! It has to be a symbiotic relationship, and the assumption that a submissive is powerless, lacking in confidence or broken in some way- as suggested on a thread before, is ludicrous. We are equal in our relationship, there is no abuse, everything is consensual, and we both know that if I don’t like it, then it won’t happen- as that would be abuse and once that happens the trust goes, and without trust, there is no relationship x Viv xx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is a difference in swinging and D/s although I have found a cross over. If you are specifically after a submissive then you may find more luck on a fetish lifestyle website. " this | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’m a switch, but totally submissive to my partner and Dom. It’s not all about BDSM either, as we enjoy the more sensual side of a sexual relationship too. We happily play without kink with others and we support each other in the same way as anyone in a relationship would. It’s part of our dynamics, but does not define us. We are committed to each other because of how we feel about each other, not because he can slap my bum and say he owns me. We built up the trust and when I was ready, and we’d discussed everything, we explored more completely my submissive nature, but only with him. We’ve had people contact us, demanding I be their sub, and it’s been a big no! I choose who I’m submissive to, not strangers who think they can say they’re dominant and demand my attention and obedience. Sadly there has been a lack of respect shown to us, by these people, as they don’t understand that this is something within our relationship, and just because I tick boxes where they’re concerned, does not mean that they are entitled to “own” me. I fell in love with him long before he became my Dom, and the respect I had for him as the man in my life, has grown as we’ve grown together in our relationship. He makes me feel protected and loved...but it’s damn hot when he controls me though, haha x Viv xx " This made me smile In all the time ive been on swinging sites, its never been to look for a Dom, amd if a guy messaged me saying he is and looking for a sub i delete right away. I dont actively seek that exact relationship here with anyone and far from look for it here. Like you say it comes later when you've built up something. I dont want to meet someone who thinks if we get on it will automatically lead to that in a causl fwb type thing. You guys got it sussed tho | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Whilst I agree with the majority of what is being said on this thread, I am going to make an unpopular statement. Submissives do not have all the control. I’ll explain - it is a power exchange and within that there are safe words that stop everything. When the safe word is used a submissive can walk away from the dynamic at anytime for any reason. This stops the D/s, the power exchange finishes straight away. The common perception is that this gives the submissive total control, which is true to an extent. It is not just a submissive that can use a safe word and stop the dynamic, a Dominant can do this as well. Which makes it an equal power share - both people have the ability to change the dynamic. A submissive choose who to submit and can remove that submission at anytime. A Dominant chooses who to dominant and can remove that domination at anytime. It is one of the purest forms of power exchange and equality that I can think of. Not an unpopular statement if you scroll up I have said a similar thing. I must say that overnight the quality of the contributions has been very impressive. I am also of the view that it takes strength to submit and submission in BDSM is not a sign of weakness. I think the problem is that on the swinging scene you run into women who say they are submissive of a certain dom, who controls who they sleep with and can make them sleep with whoever the dom wants. If you ask them what else the dom does (other than hitting their sexual buttons) in terms of support they normally come up blank. This is different from where the submissive is making a positive choice to give up that control within the context of a supportive D/S and it is a requirement of the sub that the dom takes that control. It is also different from the sub slut where sexual submission is there kink. Again they are not sleep walking into the situation, it is a positive choice. However for me although D/S can have some sexual context, it is not the main driver. I’ve been on here years under many different guises and I always love and relate with your posts and knowledge " Thanks | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I’m a switch, but totally submissive to my partner and Dom. It’s not all about BDSM either, as we enjoy the more sensual side of a sexual relationship too. We happily play without kink with others and we support each other in the same way as anyone in a relationship would. It’s part of our dynamics, but does not define us. We are committed to each other because of how we feel about each other, not because he can slap my bum and say he owns me. We built up the trust and when I was ready, and we’d discussed everything, we explored more completely my submissive nature, but only with him. We’ve had people contact us, demanding I be their sub, and it’s been a big no! I choose who I’m submissive to, not strangers who think they can say they’re dominant and demand my attention and obedience. Sadly there has been a lack of respect shown to us, by these people, as they don’t understand that this is something within our relationship, and just because I tick boxes where they’re concerned, does not mean that they are entitled to “own” me. I fell in love with him long before he became my Dom, and the respect I had for him as the man in my life, has grown as we’ve grown together in our relationship. He makes me feel protected and loved...but it’s damn hot when he controls me though, haha x Viv xx This made me smile In all the time ive been on swinging sites, its never been to look for a Dom, amd if a guy messaged me saying he is and looking for a sub i delete right away. I dont actively seek that exact relationship here with anyone and far from look for it here. Like you say it comes later when you've built up something. I dont want to meet someone who thinks if we get on it will automatically lead to that in a causl fwb type thing. You guys got it sussed tho " Thank you. I’ve never wanted a Dom, always saw it as controlling in a negative way, but I didn’t understand it. I saw someone being “owned” as demeaning and restrictive, but with him, and the education that I got from friends in the fet scene, I saw that it could be liberating and, within the right relationship, loving. Haha, I also didn’t want to have a relationship or fall in love either, but then I met him, he helped me trust again too, so this has been so uplifting for me. Tbh it’s been Domme’s who have been the worst for being rude to us, so dismissive of him as a man, not just my Dom and partner. I just laugh at them and tell them I owe them nothing, least of all any respect, and block and forget. Demeaning someone into submission is abusive, if not agreed by prior arrangement. I’m not submissive enough for some people, it would seem, and telling me what to do isn’t always successful. Some people forget that it’s a choice, and that choice should be respected. Respect isn’t demanded, it is earned and given. Some wannabe dominants need to take that on board xx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |