FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

Pc or non pc ...rhetorical question

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ...

Yet if a man states WW only a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse...

I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What does WW mean?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm not sure where PC comes in to this or what you ate actually saying is or isn't okay

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eakcoupleCouple
over a year ago

peak district


"What does WW mean?"

We don't know either! Willy Wonka?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What does WW mean?

We don't know either! Willy Wonka? "

Welcoming womb?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ...

Yet if a man states WW only a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse...

I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ...

"

ww equals wild women?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Wtf is a WW

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I doubt many women would bother to reply to what ever WW is what's the point. But then 95% of the time here it is guys contacting women and I doubt there are many saying hello you are not my type so wont meet you! And if they did the recipient would more than likley laugh above anything else.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *SAchickWoman
over a year ago

Hillside desolate


"What does WW mean?"

Weight Watchers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothman2000Man
over a year ago

Leicestershire

Wet wipes?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ighlander80884Man
over a year ago

Inverness

White women I assume, can't say I've seen it ever been started in a profile

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say that WW means white woman.

I do hope it's not Wonder Woman as that is seriously restricting your options.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"White women I assume, can't say I've seen it ever been started in a profile"

Correct ... it’s sort of implied if BBC is big black cock ... ww would be white women ...

I have seen it on profiles over the 5+ years being on and off this site ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say that WW means white woman.

I do hope it's not Wonder Woman as that is seriously restricting your options."

Lol Wonder Woman ... that’s limiting it somewhat as you say

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *esireXposedMan
over a year ago

East sussex

Is it OK to post a rhetorical question in a forum?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wtf is a WW "
wild women....... i love a wild woman

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Is it OK to post a rhetorical question in a forum?"
no

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wist my nipplesCouple
over a year ago

North East Scotland, mostly


"Is it OK to post a rhetorical question in a forum?"

Very good Mr.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

White willy... It is in our human nature to be hypocritical..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eal_curves_is_backWoman
over a year ago

London

It is OK to have personal choice. It is not OK to question personal choice. Even if it does not include you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 21/09/19 10:59:43]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Some folk are just really clumsy with how they express their preferences

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"It is OK to have personal choice. It is not OK to question personal choice. Even if it does not include you."

Concisely put ... personal choice that then attracts abuse from others I find distressing and puts a bad taste in ones mouth.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Is it OK to post a rhetorical question in a forum?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Some folk are just really clumsy with how they express their preferences "

That I can accept and understand as a reasonable excuse ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ollycouple71Couple
over a year ago

manchester


"What does WW mean?

We don't know either! WWilly Wonka? "

willy wanker?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oneyjule65Couple
over a year ago

Halifax


"I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say that WW means white woman.

I do hope it's not Wonder Woman as that is seriously restricting your options."

I am Wonder woman...well in my pics anyway..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull

[Removed by poster at 21/09/19 11:11:50]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say that WW means white woman.

I do hope it's not Wonder Woman as that is seriously restricting your options.

I am Wonder woman...well in my pics anyway.. "

Well yes but your also a Nun and a Policewoman ... multiple personalities!!?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull


"Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ...

Yet if a man states WW only a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse...

I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ...

"

Try BBW op, it's a more accepted term than Wide Women

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ...

Yet if a man states WW only a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse...

I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ...

Try BBW op, it's a more accepted term than Wide Women "

Poster wrong term your getting confused lol ww is white women

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

No abuse is acceptable and I don't think I've seen it in the forum in my 10 years here of this reported nature. It ought to be patently clear that tastes and choice are paramount and if someone states their own, it's a healthy aspect of this lifestyle. What amazes me is when someone totally believes they will be wanted by someone because they are What they are looking for', height, interests, age etc, as a fab single man Mk 1.0, when the users want a less basic version that understands and appreciates them as an individual with experience who knows their own tastes. 'I ticked all her boxes' . Except she found insufficient attraction and compatibility.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualMan
over a year ago

Sutton

People who post threads like this show their racism from the start. He objects to "BBC" (an acronym I hate) but does not mention the profiles that state " no blacks or asians".

Additionally, women that I have spoken to who do put a racial preference for black men on their profile get a load of abuse in private messages from white men.

But as someone said above certain people complain only about their exclusion and do not see the wider picture.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"People who post threads like this show their racism from the start. He objects to "BBC" (an acronym I hate) but does not mention the profiles that state " no blacks or asians".

Additionally, women that I have spoken to who do put a racial preference for black men on their profile get a load of abuse in private messages from white men.

But as someone said above certain people complain only about their exclusion and do not see the wider picture. "

Please don’t turn this into a racism rant... couldn’t be further from the truth.

I focused on one specific and didn’t mention blacks or Asians because it wasn’t relevant to my post, And If you knew the rules of the forum you’d know you cannot name and shame users or account holders names in threads it’s against the policy.

Additionally if you read other posts, I updated with further more clarifying comments ... it also had nothing to do with exclusion or inclusion.

You are of course entitled to your opinion but I can assure you it has nothing to do with racism... the thread was whether it was pc or not (rhetorical because any abuse is not ok ) and why it’s ok for one acronym but not the other ... please be mindful of calling people racists in a post that is not ok not cool and making a very dangerous assumption ....

please don’t project your personal feelings onto others making them appear the bad guy... you have no basis to make a call of racism about me or based on the very specific topic ( you don’t know if I myself am white, mixed race, coloured, Hispanic, Asian or even identify as black etc ) ... that is all I will say on that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London


"People who post threads like this show their racism from the start. He objects to "BBC" (an acronym I hate) but does not mention the profiles that state " no blacks or asians".

Additionally, women that I have spoken to who do put a racial preference for black men on their profile get a load of abuse in private messages from white men.

But as someone said above certain people complain only about their exclusion and do not see the wider picture.

Please don’t turn this into a racism rant... couldn’t be further from the truth.

I focused on one specific and didn’t mention blacks or Asians because it wasn’t relevant to my post, And If you knew the rules of the forum you’d know you cannot name and shame users or account holders names in threads it’s against the policy.

Additionally if you read other posts, I updated with further more clarifying comments ... it also had nothing to do with exclusion or inclusion.

You are of course entitled to your opinion but I can assure you it has nothing to do with racism... the thread was whether it was pc or not (rhetorical because any abuse is not ok ) and why it’s ok for one acronym but not the other ... please be mindful of calling people racists in a post that is not ok not cool and making a very dangerous assumption ....

please don’t project your personal feelings onto others making them appear the bad guy... you have no basis to make a call of racism about me or based on the very specific topic ( you don’t know if I myself am white, mixed race, coloured, Hispanic, Asian or even identify as black etc ) ... that is all I will say on that. "

Au contraire, YOU made it a racist comment by questioning why it was okay to state bbc whilst ignoring those who state no blacks or asians.

I say to you what I say to the black and asians who complain about being excluded: get over yourself. Concentrate on those interested in you and respect those people who don't want to fuck you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

People can choose whoever they want to have sex with them irrespective of any reason given or not. Their body. Their rules. Doesn’t matter if it’s a racist sizest agest decision. It’s their body not yours.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The answer is the same as it is to most questions in life. Power.

If you have the power in a situation you can demand anything. But in these cases it's an extremely effective double whammy as they get to punch down while telling everyone it's punching up

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What does WW mean?

We don't know either! Willy Wonka? Welcoming womb?"

YES!!! Hahaha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"People who post threads like this show their racism from the start. He objects to "BBC" (an acronym I hate) but does not mention the profiles that state " no blacks or asians".

Additionally, women that I have spoken to who do put a racial preference for black men on their profile get a load of abuse in private messages from white men.

But as someone said above certain people complain only about their exclusion and do not see the wider picture.

Please don’t turn this into a racism rant... couldn’t be further from the truth.

I focused on one specific and didn’t mention blacks or Asians because it wasn’t relevant to my post, And If you knew the rules of the forum you’d know you cannot name and shame users or account holders names in threads it’s against the policy.

Additionally if you read other posts, I updated with further more clarifying comments ... it also had nothing to do with exclusion or inclusion.

You are of course entitled to your opinion but I can assure you it has nothing to do with racism... the thread was whether it was pc or not (rhetorical because any abuse is not ok ) and why it’s ok for one acronym but not the other ... please be mindful of calling people racists in a post that is not ok not cool and making a very dangerous assumption ....

please don’t project your personal feelings onto others making them appear the bad guy... you have no basis to make a call of racism about me or based on the very specific topic ( you don’t know if I myself am white, mixed race, coloured, Hispanic, Asian or even identify as black etc ) ... that is all I will say on that.

Au contraire, YOU made it a racist comment by questioning why it was okay to state bbc whilst ignoring those who state no blacks or asians.

I say to you what I say to the black and asians who complain about being excluded: get over yourself. Concentrate on those interested in you and respect those people who don't want to fuck you.

"

I focused on one specific aspect I didn’t include the other two because that wasn’t the subject of the pc or non pc .. and it’s not about inclusion either as I’ve said. I know what I meant And it isn’t what you’ve replied with ... but thanks moving on

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualMan
over a year ago

Sutton

You would say that.

There are so many issues with your response and I don't have the energy to deal with them all.

The point is that other people's sexual preferences whether same sex, or inter racial is a non issue.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London


"You would say that.

There are so many issues with your response and I don't have the energy to deal with them all.

The point is that other people's sexual preferences whether same sex, or inter racial is a non issue."

Exactly: struggle to understand why that seems to elude some people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"You would say that.

There are so many issues with your response and I don't have the energy to deal with them all.

The point is that other people's sexual preferences whether same sex, or inter racial is a non issue."

Original post ;

Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ...

Yet if a man states WW only, a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse...

I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ...

To recap there is no racism in that post... it’s very specific about two acronyms... it’s not about inclusiveness... the rhetorical part is it’s not ok for anyone to send abuse for their preference...

It’s actually quite funny how you’ve read into a statement and seen racism... that speaks volumes about you and your projecting your perception onto this topic ... I say again it is not racist. You also have failed to answer your prev posting which is clear you don’t understand you can not name and shame ...

I certainly won’t be devoting anymore time to explain myself to both of you that cite it as racism...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top