Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What does WW mean?" We don't know either! Willy Wonka? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What does WW mean? We don't know either! Willy Wonka? " Welcoming womb? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ... Yet if a man states WW only a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse... I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ... " ww equals wild women? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What does WW mean?" Weight Watchers | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"White women I assume, can't say I've seen it ever been started in a profile" Correct ... it’s sort of implied if BBC is big black cock ... ww would be white women ... I have seen it on profiles over the 5+ years being on and off this site ... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say that WW means white woman. I do hope it's not Wonder Woman as that is seriously restricting your options." Lol Wonder Woman ... that’s limiting it somewhat as you say | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it OK to post a rhetorical question in a forum?" Very good ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is OK to have personal choice. It is not OK to question personal choice. Even if it does not include you." Concisely put ... personal choice that then attracts abuse from others I find distressing and puts a bad taste in ones mouth. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some folk are just really clumsy with how they express their preferences " That I can accept and understand as a reasonable excuse ... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What does WW mean? We don't know either! WWilly Wonka? " willy wanker? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say that WW means white woman. I do hope it's not Wonder Woman as that is seriously restricting your options." I am Wonder woman...well in my pics anyway.. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say that WW means white woman. I do hope it's not Wonder Woman as that is seriously restricting your options. I am Wonder woman...well in my pics anyway.. ![]() Well yes but your also a Nun and a Policewoman ... multiple personalities!!? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ... Yet if a man states WW only a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse... I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ... " Try BBW op, it's a more accepted term than Wide Women ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ... Yet if a man states WW only a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse... I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ... Try BBW op, it's a more accepted term than Wide Women ![]() Poster wrong term your getting confused lol ww is white women | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People who post threads like this show their racism from the start. He objects to "BBC" (an acronym I hate) but does not mention the profiles that state " no blacks or asians". Additionally, women that I have spoken to who do put a racial preference for black men on their profile get a load of abuse in private messages from white men. But as someone said above certain people complain only about their exclusion and do not see the wider picture. " Please don’t turn this into a racism rant... couldn’t be further from the truth. I focused on one specific and didn’t mention blacks or Asians because it wasn’t relevant to my post, And If you knew the rules of the forum you’d know you cannot name and shame users or account holders names in threads it’s against the policy. Additionally if you read other posts, I updated with further more clarifying comments ... it also had nothing to do with exclusion or inclusion. You are of course entitled to your opinion but I can assure you it has nothing to do with racism... the thread was whether it was pc or not (rhetorical because any abuse is not ok ) and why it’s ok for one acronym but not the other ... please be mindful of calling people racists in a post that is not ok not cool and making a very dangerous assumption .... please don’t project your personal feelings onto others making them appear the bad guy... you have no basis to make a call of racism about me or based on the very specific topic ( you don’t know if I myself am white, mixed race, coloured, Hispanic, Asian or even identify as black etc ) ... that is all I will say on that. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People who post threads like this show their racism from the start. He objects to "BBC" (an acronym I hate) but does not mention the profiles that state " no blacks or asians". Additionally, women that I have spoken to who do put a racial preference for black men on their profile get a load of abuse in private messages from white men. But as someone said above certain people complain only about their exclusion and do not see the wider picture. Please don’t turn this into a racism rant... couldn’t be further from the truth. I focused on one specific and didn’t mention blacks or Asians because it wasn’t relevant to my post, And If you knew the rules of the forum you’d know you cannot name and shame users or account holders names in threads it’s against the policy. Additionally if you read other posts, I updated with further more clarifying comments ... it also had nothing to do with exclusion or inclusion. You are of course entitled to your opinion but I can assure you it has nothing to do with racism... the thread was whether it was pc or not (rhetorical because any abuse is not ok ) and why it’s ok for one acronym but not the other ... please be mindful of calling people racists in a post that is not ok not cool and making a very dangerous assumption .... please don’t project your personal feelings onto others making them appear the bad guy... you have no basis to make a call of racism about me or based on the very specific topic ( you don’t know if I myself am white, mixed race, coloured, Hispanic, Asian or even identify as black etc ) ... that is all I will say on that. ![]() Au contraire, YOU made it a racist comment by questioning why it was okay to state bbc whilst ignoring those who state no blacks or asians. I say to you what I say to the black and asians who complain about being excluded: get over yourself. Concentrate on those interested in you and respect those people who don't want to fuck you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What does WW mean? We don't know either! Willy Wonka? Welcoming womb?" YES!!! Hahaha | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People who post threads like this show their racism from the start. He objects to "BBC" (an acronym I hate) but does not mention the profiles that state " no blacks or asians". Additionally, women that I have spoken to who do put a racial preference for black men on their profile get a load of abuse in private messages from white men. But as someone said above certain people complain only about their exclusion and do not see the wider picture. Please don’t turn this into a racism rant... couldn’t be further from the truth. I focused on one specific and didn’t mention blacks or Asians because it wasn’t relevant to my post, And If you knew the rules of the forum you’d know you cannot name and shame users or account holders names in threads it’s against the policy. Additionally if you read other posts, I updated with further more clarifying comments ... it also had nothing to do with exclusion or inclusion. You are of course entitled to your opinion but I can assure you it has nothing to do with racism... the thread was whether it was pc or not (rhetorical because any abuse is not ok ) and why it’s ok for one acronym but not the other ... please be mindful of calling people racists in a post that is not ok not cool and making a very dangerous assumption .... please don’t project your personal feelings onto others making them appear the bad guy... you have no basis to make a call of racism about me or based on the very specific topic ( you don’t know if I myself am white, mixed race, coloured, Hispanic, Asian or even identify as black etc ) ... that is all I will say on that. ![]() I focused on one specific aspect I didn’t include the other two because that wasn’t the subject of the pc or non pc .. and it’s not about inclusion either as I’ve said. I know what I meant And it isn’t what you’ve replied with ... but thanks moving on | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You would say that. There are so many issues with your response and I don't have the energy to deal with them all. The point is that other people's sexual preferences whether same sex, or inter racial is a non issue." Exactly: struggle to understand why that seems to elude some people. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You would say that. There are so many issues with your response and I don't have the energy to deal with them all. The point is that other people's sexual preferences whether same sex, or inter racial is a non issue." Original post ; Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ... Yet if a man states WW only, a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse... I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ... To recap there is no racism in that post... it’s very specific about two acronyms... it’s not about inclusiveness... the rhetorical part is it’s not ok for anyone to send abuse for their preference... It’s actually quite funny how you’ve read into a statement and seen racism... that speaks volumes about you and your projecting your perception onto this topic ... I say again it is not racist. You also have failed to answer your prev posting which is clear you don’t understand you can not name and shame ... I certainly won’t be devoting anymore time to explain myself to both of you that cite it as racism... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |