Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I understand that but what about a few messages first then say our time is limited and would you send a face pic now and we will do the same see if we click " In this instance, I think their no reply is a reply n itself. They didn't fancy you and to spare a load of potential grief, left the conversation. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I understand that but what about a few messages first then say our time is limited and would you send a face pic now and we will do the same see if we click " Trouble is, the female of the species have us by the short hairs. They're so heavily outnumbered and hence in such demand that they can make up their own rules, and change them, at will. Common sense doesn't often seem to enter into it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I understand that but what about a few messages first then say our time is limited and would you send a face pic now and we will do the same see if we click " Because it's their profile and they can run it how they like. Women and couples get infinitely more messages per day than guys, all they're doing is cutting out the people who can't make the effort; if you want to meet them then they're going to see your face eventually | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hate it when you read that on profile. Then when you send a pic no reply, think its rude as some people are very shy and have to be very discreet, either with the job they do or partner/wife does not know about sight or sexual orientation thoughts please." You not think it's rather presumptuous just because you sent the picture that you expect a reply... See this kind of rant in the forum all the time tens upon tens of guys looking to meet single ladies and couples just having a profile does not mean they have to respond. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I understand that but what about a few messages first then say our time is limited and would you send a face pic now and we will do the same see if we click " I'm with you op on this one. I would never ask for a face pic straight away. I find it's good to have a chat first. Then exchange pics if both parties click | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I understand that but what about a few messages first then say our time is limited and would you send a face pic now and we will do the same see if we click I'm with you op on this one. I would never ask for a face pic straight away. I find it's good to have a chat first. Then exchange pics if both parties click" Now I prefer it the other way around. I'd rather do pics first thing. I'd hate to get to know someone, potentially getting on well, only to find they don't float my boat visually. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I understand that but what about a few messages first then say our time is limited and would you send a face pic now and we will do the same see if we click Trouble is, the female of the species have us by the short hairs. They're so heavily outnumbered and hence in such demand that they can make up their own rules, and change them, at will. Common sense doesn't often seem to enter into it." We don't have you by the short n curlies. Men pull them out n hand them to us, in the hopes of a shag. Our rules would still be our rules, regardless of how many men were here. Alot of men are just so desperate to get laid and don't like it when they don't, so blame us for making rules, you can choose to ignore women whose profiles state things you don't like...most choose to message anyway, then moan about no response and rules, when they do. No? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hate it when you read that on profile. Then when you send a pic no reply, think its rude as some people are very shy and have to be very discreet, either with the job they do or partner/wife does not know about sight or sexual orientation thoughts please." Then don’t message them? It’s their choice to ask for a face picture. It’s your choice whether you message them with a picture or not. No one is forcing you to do it! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I understand that but what about a few messages first then say our time is limited and would you send a face pic now and we will do the same see if we click Trouble is, the female of the species have us by the short hairs. They're so heavily outnumbered and hence in such demand that they can make up their own rules, and change them, at will. Common sense doesn't often seem to enter into it. We don't have you by the short n curlies. Men pull them out n hand them to us, in the hopes of a shag. Our rules would still be our rules, regardless of how many men were here. Alot of men are just so desperate to get laid and don't like it when they don't, so blame us for making rules, you can choose to ignore women whose profiles state things you don't like...most choose to message anyway, then moan about no response and rules, when they do. No? " No chance of a quickie then, I s'pose? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I understand that but what about a few messages first then say our time is limited and would you send a face pic now and we will do the same see if we click I'm with you op on this one. I would never ask for a face pic straight away. I find it's good to have a chat first. Then exchange pics if both parties click Now I prefer it the other way around. I'd rather do pics first thing. I'd hate to get to know someone, potentially getting on well, only to find they don't float my boat visually. " Yes I can understand that too... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I understand that but what about a few messages first then say our time is limited and would you send a face pic now and we will do the same see if we click Trouble is, the female of the species have us by the short hairs. They're so heavily outnumbered and hence in such demand that they can make up their own rules, and change them, at will. Common sense doesn't often seem to enter into it. We don't have you by the short n curlies. Men pull them out n hand them to us, in the hopes of a shag. Our rules would still be our rules, regardless of how many men were here. Alot of men are just so desperate to get laid and don't like it when they don't, so blame us for making rules, you can choose to ignore women whose profiles state things you don't like...most choose to message anyway, then moan about no response and rules, when they do. No? " Yes. But I imagine it's generally in the spirit of "nothing ventured...". The huge asymmetry in male/female populations on fab means. quite clearly, that females will always be able to pick and chose their partners from the large (and largely desperate, you're right) pool of available men. So, while I hate to contradict a lady, you do indeed have us firmly clenched in your dainty fists. It's not right, or wrong, it's just the way it is. If a man chooses to play this game, them's the rules. Take it or leave it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow" But this is fantasy for me, why is it shallow that I should want to be attracted to the person I fuck? No personality could make up for me by fancying that person. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow But this is fantasy for me, why is it shallow that I should want to be attracted to the person I fuck? No personality could make up for me by fancying that person." Couldn’t agree with this more. Yes I’m shallow, so sue me! I want physical attraction AND personality! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow" Some attraction? Nah we need lots of attraction. Not here to just fuck anything. Personality and physical attraction or it ain't happening. Can't understand why that would be shallow. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow But this is fantasy for me, why is it shallow that I should want to be attracted to the person I fuck? No personality could make up for me by fancying that person." We don't all work the same way, I suppose. The most powerful attraction I've ever felt, ultimately love, to be honest, was/is for a woman I met online last year. The most amazing mind, wit, creativity. We really dovetailed together perfectly. I wanted her regardless of appearance. The woman inside is overwhelmingly more important to me than the pretty packaging. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hate it when you read that on profile. Then when you send a pic no reply, think its rude as some people are very shy and have to be very discreet, either with the job they do or partner/wife does not know about sight or sexual orientation thoughts please." Its peoples preference suck it up and send one or pass their profile by. You wouldn't want some bi guys complaining you wouldn't let them fuck you as your profile isn't looking for men would you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow But this is fantasy for me, why is it shallow that I should want to be attracted to the person I fuck? No personality could make up for me by fancying that person. We don't all work the same way, I suppose. The most powerful attraction I've ever felt, ultimately love, to be honest, was/is for a woman I met online last year. The most amazing mind, wit, creativity. We really dovetailed together perfectly. I wanted her regardless of appearance. The woman inside is overwhelmingly more important to me than the pretty packaging." But most of us aren’t looking for love or anything even remotely approaching it. I’m married to my soulmate. Infact it would make me run a mile if there was even a hint of that sort of thing! I’m looking for someone who I can have a good laugh with AND I think is very attractive. Yes attraction is in the eye of the beholder but if I’m not feeling it then it’s not happening! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I need to see someone’s eyes. " Eyes really are special. Windows to the soul. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow But this is fantasy for me, why is it shallow that I should want to be attracted to the person I fuck? No personality could make up for me by fancying that person. We don't all work the same way, I suppose. The most powerful attraction I've ever felt, ultimately love, to be honest, was/is for a woman I met online last year. The most amazing mind, wit, creativity. We really dovetailed together perfectly. I wanted her regardless of appearance. The woman inside is overwhelmingly more important to me than the pretty packaging." Which is fine for me if I want a relationship or a life partner. I'm just not that arsed when it comes to bouncing round and bumping fun bits for a couple of hours. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I need to see someone’s eyes. Eyes really are special. Windows to the soul." Eyes and mind for me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow" When I am playing, my face is visible on my profile anyway but, I get on well with alot of people I would never want to sleep with... If I talk to people, just a normal conversation, they assume, as we get on, that I do want to sleep with them, even when my profile says I am not meeting to play. So no face, no reply is definitely my thing when looking to play. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dont undetstand women that ask for face pics with first message but also dont understand males who are foolish enough to send one. At the end of the day if they did'nt then these women would get no messages and maybe re think their demands." I won’t even respond if no picture. Sorry but I don’t want to send messages to someone I can’t see. I need to see if they would be remotely my type. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow But this is fantasy for me, why is it shallow that I should want to be attracted to the person I fuck? No personality could make up for me by fancying that person. We don't all work the same way, I suppose. The most powerful attraction I've ever felt, ultimately love, to be honest, was/is for a woman I met online last year. The most amazing mind, wit, creativity. We really dovetailed together perfectly. I wanted her regardless of appearance. The woman inside is overwhelmingly more important to me than the pretty packaging. But most of us aren’t looking for love or anything even remotely approaching it. I’m married to my soulmate. Infact it would make me run a mile if there was even a hint of that sort of thing! I’m looking for someone who I can have a good laugh with AND I think is very attractive. Yes attraction is in the eye of the beholder but if I’m not feeling it then it’s not happening!" Quite so. I'm not on Fab looking for a soulmate either (nor was I looking for one last year either - on twitter it was that I stumbled upon her). Some profiles here do read as a bit too earnest for my liking, I must say. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow But this is fantasy for me, why is it shallow that I should want to be attracted to the person I fuck? No personality could make up for me by fancying that person. Couldn’t agree with this more. Yes I’m shallow, so sue me! I want physical attraction AND personality!" It's our own opinion, are we not allowed one of those anymore. Grow up | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow But this is fantasy for me, why is it shallow that I should want to be attracted to the person I fuck? No personality could make up for me by fancying that person. We don't all work the same way, I suppose. The most powerful attraction I've ever felt, ultimately love, to be honest, was/is for a woman I met online last year. The most amazing mind, wit, creativity. We really dovetailed together perfectly. I wanted her regardless of appearance. The woman inside is overwhelmingly more important to me than the pretty packaging. Which is fine for me if I want a relationship or a life partner. I'm just not that arsed when it comes to bouncing round and bumping fun bits for a couple of hours." Everyone is different, we personally find personality more attractive, have met some nice looking people who just have no personality or conversation skills. That's just our opinion and respect others people's opinion (unlike another couple on here) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hate it when you read that on profile. Then when you send a pic no reply, think its rude as some people are very shy and have to be very discreet, either with the job they do or partner/wife does not know about sight or sexual orientation thoughts please." Your right my wife would kill me if she found out I was in this sodden pit of debauchery.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow But this is fantasy for me, why is it shallow that I should want to be attracted to the person I fuck? No personality could make up for me by fancying that person. Couldn’t agree with this more. Yes I’m shallow, so sue me! I want physical attraction AND personality! It's our own opinion, are we not allowed one of those anymore. Grow up" So it’s ok for you to say that it’s shallow to need to be physically attracted to someone first and foremost, but if someone dares to be tongue in cheek back that’s not ok? If you want to call me shallow because of my perspective, then you crack on. I absolutely 100% do need to be attracted to someone and yes I do need to see their face. If you think that makes me shallow, you are of course entitled to your own opinion... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dont undetstand women that ask for face pics with first message but also dont understand males who are foolish enough to send one. At the end of the day if they did'nt then these women would get no messages and maybe re think their demands. I won’t even respond if no picture. Sorry but I don’t want to send messages to someone I can’t see. I need to see if they would be remotely my type. " This... my time is limited and precious. Sexual attraction is 100 important gor me. I dont have a set type but i need to find something attractive or whats the point. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow But this is fantasy for me, why is it shallow that I should want to be attracted to the person I fuck? No personality could make up for me by fancying that person. Couldn’t agree with this more. Yes I’m shallow, so sue me! I want physical attraction AND personality! It's our own opinion, are we not allowed one of those anymore. Grow up So it’s ok for you to say that it’s shallow to need to be physically attracted to someone first and foremost, but if someone dares to be tongue in cheek back that’s not ok? If you want to call me shallow because of my perspective, then you crack on. I absolutely 100% do need to be attracted to someone and yes I do need to see their face. If you think that makes me shallow, you are of course entitled to your own opinion... " Show me where I called you shallow!!!! Again we voiced our opinion and didn't single you out but you got the hump and blocked us so don't say it was "tongue n cheek" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow But this is fantasy for me, why is it shallow that I should want to be attracted to the person I fuck? No personality could make up for me by fancying that person. Couldn’t agree with this more. Yes I’m shallow, so sue me! I want physical attraction AND personality! It's our own opinion, are we not allowed one of those anymore. Grow up So it’s ok for you to say that it’s shallow to need to be physically attracted to someone first and foremost, but if someone dares to be tongue in cheek back that’s not ok? If you want to call me shallow because of my perspective, then you crack on. I absolutely 100% do need to be attracted to someone and yes I do need to see their face. If you think that makes me shallow, you are of course entitled to your own opinion... Show me where I called you shallow!!!! Again we voiced our opinion and didn't single you out but you got the hump and blocked us so don't say it was "tongue n cheek"" Blocking you was nothing to do with me taking the hump - we clearly aren’t compatible so I blocked you to ensure neither of us waste each other’s time in the future. Don’t take it so personally! And your first post literally said that asking for face pictures early on is all a bit shallow. To which I replied that if wanting physical attraction AND personality makes me shallow... then clearly I am! Not sure why you’ve taken it so personally, but it just reaffirms why I blocked you as we aren’t compatible! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The whole face pic thing does our head in a bit. People who ask too early put us off, I get there has to be some attraction but see if you get on first. Personality is much more attractive than a face. It's all a bit shallow But this is fantasy for me, why is it shallow that I should want to be attracted to the person I fuck? No personality could make up for me by fancying that person. Couldn’t agree with this more. Yes I’m shallow, so sue me! I want physical attraction AND personality! It's our own opinion, are we not allowed one of those anymore. Grow up So it’s ok for you to say that it’s shallow to need to be physically attracted to someone first and foremost, but if someone dares to be tongue in cheek back that’s not ok? If you want to call me shallow because of my perspective, then you crack on. I absolutely 100% do need to be attracted to someone and yes I do need to see their face. If you think that makes me shallow, you are of course entitled to your own opinion... Show me where I called you shallow!!!! Again we voiced our opinion and didn't single you out but you got the hump and blocked us so don't say it was "tongue n cheek" Blocking you was nothing to do with me taking the hump - we clearly aren’t compatible so I blocked you to ensure neither of us waste each other’s time in the future. Don’t take it so personally! And your first post literally said that asking for face pictures early on is all a bit shallow. To which I replied that if wanting physical attraction AND personality makes me shallow... then clearly I am! Not sure why you’ve taken it so personally, but it just reaffirms why I blocked you as we aren’t compatible!" No worries, all the best | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |