Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Swingers Chat |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person "I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex. "At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation ! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person
I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex. "Who said anything about paying for sex | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I would rather fund my own lifestyle than have any man to thank for doing so." Yes and thats fair enough | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation ! "Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement."Your implication is clear, and you know that. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person
I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
Who said anything about paying for sex "You are implying you are willing to be a "sugar daddy" . A sugar daddy pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex with a person who probably wouldn't have sex with them otherwise. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I can see how some people get off on it. If everyone is happy then it’s not my problem "I dint see what the problem is if both parts are happy | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue?" I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person
I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
Who said anything about paying for sex
You are implying you are willing to be a "sugar daddy" . A sugar daddy pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex with a person who probably wouldn't have sex with them otherwise. "It's more about been controlled and stuff like that nothing to do with sex | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person
I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
Who said anything about paying for sex ..exactly
You are implying you are willing to be a "sugar daddy" . A sugar daddy pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex with a person who probably wouldn't have sex with them otherwise. " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why " Too many judgmental people | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex " Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person
I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
Who said anything about paying for sex
You are implying you are willing to be a "sugar daddy" . A sugar daddy pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex with a person who probably wouldn't have sex with them otherwise. "The idea that the person wouldn't normally have sex with them is a huge assumption. It maybe that they both want to have sex but like the added kink of ownership via gifts. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why Too many judgmental people " Your right there is to many judgemental people | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why Too many judgmental people " It's against the rules of the site. There begins and ends my judgment. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why Too many judgmental people " Too true. I'm always amazed by the judgmental and those with a closed mind on a site that is about being the very opposite. A sugar daddy type scenario/relationship does not have to be about sex at all. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why Too many judgmental people It's against the rules of the site. There begins and ends my judgment. " Not only judgemental, but incorrect too.  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If it makes everyone happy, I don't see the problem. It's not really paying for sex if you're buying someone gifts etc. I need one to fund my sex toy fetish! "Now that made me smile. With a good sugar daddy you shouldn't really need many toys lol | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If it makes everyone happy, I don't see the problem. It's not really paying for sex if you're buying someone gifts etc. I need one to fund my sex toy fetish! "Great to see a light-hearted post. Mwah ! xxx | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why Too many judgmental people Too true. I'm always amazed by the judgmental and those with a closed mind on a site that is about being the very opposite. A sugar daddy type scenario/relationship does not have to be about sex at all. " You will always get judgemental people I just dont have time for people like that | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think the sugar daddy scenario is about money. It's about ownership and control. But the tools used are gifts as opposed to toys. If both parties are willing what's the issue? I think a few people have issues with it and I dint get why Too many judgmental people It's against the rules of the site. There begins and ends my judgment. " But it isn't really, he isn't paying for sex or exchanging money for services, he's looking for a particular style of relationship that involves giving gifts. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If it makes everyone happy, I don't see the problem. It's not really paying for sex if you're buying someone gifts etc. I need one to fund my sex toy fetish! "People are just to judgemental then it comes to this kinda stuff its just like female led relationships people are just the same with that as well | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If it makes everyone happy, I don't see the problem. It's not really paying for sex if you're buying someone gifts etc. I need one to fund my sex toy fetish! "This! And my lingerie / latex / shoe fetish. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If it makes everyone happy, I don't see the problem. It's not really paying for sex if you're buying someone gifts etc. I need one to fund my sex toy fetish!
This!
And my lingerie / latex / shoe fetish. "See here comes the light hearted people that dont take things to seriously and it's good to see | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If it makes everyone happy, I don't see the problem. It's not really paying for sex if you're buying someone gifts etc. I need one to fund my sex toy fetish!
Now that made me smile. With a good sugar daddy you shouldn't really need many toys lol"I want the toys though, I love experimenting. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction." It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. " It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. " And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... " Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. " As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. " But this isn't even the same thing lol. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that."Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet. It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that.
Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet.
It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that."Wow, he didn't even do that. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that.
Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet.
It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that."Then why are there so many singles here if it's for swingers? So should all the single people be forces to leave and only couples who are truly swingers remain? People use this place for a lot of things and the poor guy never mentioned money. And merely asked a question. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. " Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that.
Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet.
It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that."You dont have a clue do you | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that.
Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet.
It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that.
Then why are there so many singles here if it's for swingers?
So should all the single people be forces to leave and only couples who are truly swingers remain?
People use this place for a lot of things and the poor guy never mentioned money. And merely asked a question.
"Eh, you can be a single swinger.. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. " My husband takes me shopping in exchange for sex..... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. " I never said anything about sex so what would it be if I took someone shopping and that was it | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that.
Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet.
It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that.
Then why are there so many singles here if it's for swingers?
So should all the single people be forces to leave and only couples who are truly swingers remain?
People use this place for a lot of things and the poor guy never mentioned money. And merely asked a question.
Eh, you can be a single swinger.. "Swingers are couples who choose to have an open relationship, allowing their partners to have sex with other people. You can't have an open relationship if you're single. So no is the answer. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think you're allowed to advertise that your willing to pay for sex.
At best a somewhat presumptuous statement, at worst a downright rude accusation !
Did I accuse anyone of anything. I made a statement.
Your implication is clear, and you know that.
Yes my statement was very clear fabswingers is a site for swingers to meet.
It isn't a vehicle for prostitutes or their clients to advertise for each other. There are other sites which cater for that.
Then why are there so many singles here if it's for swingers?
So should all the single people be forces to leave and only couples who are truly swingers remain?
People use this place for a lot of things and the poor guy never mentioned money. And merely asked a question.
Eh, you can be a single swinger..
Swingers are couples who choose to have an open relationship, allowing their partners to have sex with other people. You can't have an open relationship if you're single. So no is the answer. "I’ll let you look it up first.. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. I never said anything about sex so what would it be if I took someone shopping and that was it " You’re the one that brought the subject up.. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. " Are you trying to imply I've let a man buy me stuff in exchange for sex? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. Are you trying to imply I've let a man buy me stuff in exchange for sex? " Do I also need to explain hypothetical.. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. I never said anything about sex so what would it be if I took someone shopping and that was it You’re the one that brought the subject up.. " And your the one saying I am doing it for sex so i am asking you what it is call if I just took someone shopping and that's all | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. I never said anything about sex so what would it be if I took someone shopping and that was it You’re the one that brought the subject up.. And your the one saying I am doing it for sex so i am asking you what it is call if I just took someone shopping and that's all " Eh I didn’t, as you’re not a sugar daddy.. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. Are you trying to imply I've let a man buy me stuff in exchange for sex? Do I also need to explain hypothetical.. "'A sugar daddy is usually a generous older man who spends lavishly on his mistress, girlfriend or boyfriend.' Tell me where it says exchanging gifts for sex. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. I never said anything about sex so what would it be if I took someone shopping and that was it You’re the one that brought the subject up.. And your the one saying I am doing it for sex so i am asking you what it is call if I just took someone shopping and that's all Eh I didn’t, as you’re not a sugar daddy.. " So now your saying if you take someone shopping and dont get sex after it you ain't a sugar daddy | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. Are you trying to imply I've let a man buy me stuff in exchange for sex? Do I also need to explain hypothetical..
'A sugar daddy is usually a generous older man who spends lavishly on his mistress, girlfriend or boyfriend.'
Tell me where it says exchanging gifts for sex.
"a rich and usually older man who buys presents for or gives money to a younger person, especially a woman, usually so that the younger person will spend time with him and have a sexual relationship with him. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. Are you trying to imply I've let a man buy me stuff in exchange for sex? Do I also need to explain hypothetical..
'A sugar daddy is usually a generous older man who spends lavishly on his mistress, girlfriend or boyfriend.'
Tell me where it says exchanging gifts for sex.
"" mistress, girlfriend or boyfriend.'" These words indicate a sexual relationship of some sort. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"my partner jokes that if instead of meeting me he had gone with a prostitute it would of cost him less and he would have more sex "Now that made me laugh  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" pays for stuff, rent, goods, food ect. Therefore they are paying for sex Nope. They are paying for "stuff, rent, goods, food ect.[sic]" Nice contradiction. It’s an exchange for services, I suppose you can dress it up whatever way you want to suit a narrative but at the end of the day it boils back to the same transaction.. It's a form of relationship, by your logic every relationship is an exchange of services then. And picking up a woman on a street corner is also a form of relationship... Not really though is it? It's a business transaction. As I said, things can be dressed up but be the same out come.. But this isn't even the same thing lol. Not sure where the confusion is.. If a man took you shopping in exchange for sex, what is that? Putting any possible past experiences aside.. I never said anything about sex so what would it be if I took someone shopping and that was it You’re the one that brought the subject up.. And your the one saying I am doing it for sex so i am asking you what it is call if I just took someone shopping and that's all Eh I didn’t, as you’re not a sugar daddy.. So now your saying if you take someone shopping and dont get sex after it you ain't a sugar daddy" Are you a fish and forget everything you write.. YOU said you’re not.. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"op your 27 who would you be planning on being a sugar daddy for?" You can be a sugar daddy to anyone it's just a name for it | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person "Are you wealthy?  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What's peoples thoughts on it I cant say I wouldn't do it for the right person Are you wealthy? "There you go, OP. Snagged one already.... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
